Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Word - Guardian Musicblog

mdavies27's picture

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2010/oct/28/inky-fingers-maggo...

just noticed on the Guardian website, thought it was interesting.

0

I'm not sure what the 'august' Mr Hep thinks of that.

And I'm also not quite sure what to make of the description of these here blogs as 'bewilderingly active'.
An odd piece of writing, in both tone and theme.

0
drakeygirl | 28 October 2010 - 3:57pm

I look forward to Mr. Hepworth's considered opinion, if any.

"...if future cultural historians are ever looking for a sentence that encapsulates the way supposedly democratising trends in electronic communication have magnified the bogus sense of entitlement of pre-existing UK media elites, this one will do nicely."

0
skirky | 28 October 2010 - 4:18pm

If he's an august critc

what does he do for the other 11 months of the year?

1
Molesworth | 29 October 2010 - 8:21am

My sentiments exactly,

especially the bit about about being 'bewilderingly active'. Snide I would call it. Perhaps if we all had earnest & ill-thought out discussions a la Polly Twaddle, they might 'respect' us more.

0
Francis Barry-Walsh | 28 October 2010 - 4:16pm

Bewilderingly active...

Blimey, I'm still in my Peejams.

0
Helena Handcart | 28 October 2010 - 4:17pm

Good to see the old maxim...

... "Why use one word when a thousand will do" being tested to the limit.

Must have got a thesaurus for his/her birthday.

0
Reno Dakota | 28 October 2010 - 4:33pm

But not, alas

any advice on the correct use of the word "latter"

0
STD | 28 October 2010 - 6:26pm

Makes Morley

look like Swells.

0
Pax Romana | 28 October 2010 - 4:40pm

I'm bewildered by all this activity

Actually, I'm more bewildered by the above-quoted phrase:

"...if future cultural historians are ever looking for a sentence that encapsulates the way supposedly democratising trends in electronic communication have magnified the bogus sense of entitlement of pre-existing UK media elites, this one will do nicely."

What does this actually mean? I'm pretty sure DH and Mayo are allowed to have the same opinion without it being in some way elitist or bogus, aren't they?

0
Uncle Monty | 28 October 2010 - 5:31pm

I think you'll find that

the bewilderingly comatose Guardian Musicblog is suffering from a dose of anal retentive cockery, or "iBuggery" as it will become known.

Somebody turn that into A Serbian Film quick.

Little bit of self-referential metabloggery. My name's Ben Elton, thank you, goodnight...

0
Molesworth | 29 October 2010 - 8:30am

The least compelling of

The least compelling of these involved a quest for the identity of the venerable authority concerned.

As an experiment, I've just Googled "Le Noise unlistenable" and the first result was to a Word blog thread where, in the first paragraph it explains that David Hepworth thought the album was unlistenable.

Hardly much of a quest really.

2
stimpy | 28 October 2010 - 5:47pm

As an aside...

Why isn't there a 'close quotes' on a block quote tag (see example above)? It looks 'untidy' to have just the open quote.

0
stimpy | 29 October 2010 - 8:14am

I have noticed that too

It seems to be how they are rendered - anything I've blockquoted here has been the same presentation.

0
el hombre malo | 29 October 2010 - 9:13am

It's a graphical element

Not an accurate representation of the proper punctuation. It's there to remind people that what follows is quoted from elsewhere, and it's a pretty common way of doing it.

This is especially true on community websites, because adding the closing quote generally requires the writer to insert some extra HTML. I'm not going to demand that everyone learn how to use <div> or <span> tags just so things look tidier.

0
Fraser Lewry | 29 October 2010 - 9:28am

Coo... You live and learn

I suppose I assumed it would 'just happen' when it encountered the

tag.

Note: I know less than bugger all about HTML :-)

0
stimpy | 29 October 2010 - 12:23pm

There was 'nowt wrong with your assumption

It's a completely logical to expect that the closing quote tag would appear automatically. If only HTML was as consistent.

0
Fraser Lewry | 29 October 2010 - 12:28pm

I'm just

actively bewildered, even more so after reading that pile of tripe.

0
Adman | 28 October 2010 - 7:24pm

In the accompanying photo

- is that an enlarged Lenny cover...?

0
badartdog | 28 October 2010 - 10:35pm

What a load of old guff.

That is all. This person cannot write for toffee.

0
ganglesprocket | 28 October 2010 - 10:39pm

The clues are there

Look, it's very simple.

It's either Backwards7 or the Captain writing brilliantly contrived spoof claptrap solely for our amusement. They knew someone would spot it eventually.

I love those guys.

It's not real. Really, it can't be.

0
Beezer | 29 October 2010 - 9:25am

I'd like to make it…

...absolutely clear that whoever wrote it, it wasn't me.

0
Inky Fingers | 29 October 2010 - 9:38am

Ouch

I hate writing like that. It reminds me of when you've got a fever and your mind races, making no sense and giving you a headache.

Less is more.

0
Spartacus Mills | 29 October 2010 - 9:46am

Should I have known

that the John Grant album was "gay" in some way? I have no idea what the writer is on about, genuinely.

0
ceepee | 29 October 2010 - 1:57pm

I'm genuinely not sure...

.. but I think I was amused by that.

0
daddyorchipsblog | 29 October 2010 - 2:34pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd