Entertainment For Lively Minds
Why Are People On The Word Website So Grumpy?
Posted by Davy H on 16 December 2009 - 1:30am.
They are though, aren't they?
And everything seems to end in an argument.
I bet this does too.
Merry Christmas x
- More from Davy H.
- Login or register to post comments










Awww
Bless you.
And Merry Christmas, one and all.
And To You Fraser
and everyone else at The Word and on the forum. Have a good one. Love and Peace.
It's like the naughty children
in class at school getting all the attention even though they're the minority. There's lot's of us happy souls here who stand around and watch the big boys fighting.
Merry Christmas!
I don't detect much grumpiness...
..although your post is a little on the grumpy side :)
Arf !
Do you wanna take it outside?
If you think people here are grumpy...
...then you should look elsewhere on the web. I think this site is an oasis of good manners and sunshine.
What a rare triptych...
Oasis, good manners, and sunshine.
Surely that should be
"Oasis, good manners, and sun-sheeeeyine"
It's because
we appear to have been infiltrated by a handful of spammers, last night/this morning.
Either that, or a few new members are really enthusiastic about the things they love.
A broad range of subjects for discussion...
...usually leads to a good range of views and so people defend their positions and grumpiness occasionally ensues. But I've not seen too much rudeness or grumpiness on The Word site. The subjects are usually interesting (sometimes becoming even more so as the debate develops) and there are times where it's downright funny (as in Britney Spears being listed as one of the world's most influential people - bless!).
This is a lively site that reflects a lively and interesting magazine. The participants here strike me as being more in the Fezziwig camp, rather than that of Scrooge.
I'll now end with "Bah!", followed by the inevitable "Humbug!".
I think
Other websites should aspire to our level of politeness and good humour.
It's not that bad
There are many threads where we share our collective joy - The Word Guide To Babies being one shining example.
Despite the occasional big blowup (Did Rob Fitzpatrick read the FAQ?) we generally get along OK, clarifying differences and mostly respecting each others' views. There is a level of pedantry here (some would say "accuracy") but in the main I see that as people who really know & care a lot about the subject sharing their knowledge.
If you want proper grumpiness, try some of the other music magazine websites - I can't find the link right now but I had posted a link here to Uncut's messageboard for a piece of news and the level of swearing and offensiveness was very diferent to the banter here.
And if people want to tap into our collective experience, the people here are usually only too happy to help with advice on guitars, stereos, books, etc.
Curmudgeonly
in the nicest possible way. It's down to the age of the average poster isn't it? Things aren't what they used to be is a theme to be fair, though usually countered by some. As for arguments, it only takes one to make a personal remark - that can be enough to sour a thread and it's usually the political/religious type subjects that go that way. But then a daft punning topic will pop up soon enough to lighten things again. There's enough good vibes to keep most of us coming back for more.
Not all bad
Negative views always seem to seem more strident than positive views when written down. I'm not sure why that is, possibly because when someone says they like something they leave it at that but negativity feels like it requires justification which then emphasises the negativity.
Not Too Grumpy...
I think The Massive manages to avoid the anonymity-inspired nastiness that seems to be a feature in many other places.
Sticking to the rules helps (thanks Fraser)and generally, at the first sign of a really negative / personal comment, I just stop reading - if everyone does that those threads tend to go away, although there are notable exceptions, clearly.
I laugh out loud far more than I get annoyed.
Try the BBC MBs!
You should go on some of the BBC MB's. Mention Chris Evans, Sarah Kennedy and why don't Radio 2 play more Music for the over-50s on the Radio 2 MB then watch what happens! I know because I used to get involved until I realised it wasn't worth it and my Blood Pressure has improved since!
This is definitely one of the nicest places on the Net.
Ian
Oh yes
I did have a look in those BBC 'boards' once. Terrifying!
This is what
This is what they're talking about on the BBC have your say site at the moment
http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?forumID=7347&edition=1&ttl=2...
Terrifying is indeed the right description.
When the iPlayer was still in beta,
I used to help out a little with the forum for beta testers. Bear in mind that these are people who have volunteered to get early version software to play with, and have been given special access credentials to allow them to do so, effectively giving them rights to play with several million quid's worth of development infrastructure.
Though the vast majority of the community of beta testers did a splendid job and persevered through all sorts of hiccups, an unsettling number proved to be thoroughly ungrateful bastards, and grumpy as fuck with it. We put up with (most) of them because they gave us useful feedback along with the bile, but honestly, some of them were just unpleasant people.
The ratio of splendid to unpleasant here, by contrast, is WAY better than what my experience of a self-selecting cohort of geeks suggests it can be.
Haha! I was one of those beta testers!
(I'm a not-so-secret geek, I adore software testing)
I'd like to think I was one of the pleasant ones, rather than one of the grumpy-as-fuck ones...
spEak You're bRanes
I probably got this link on a prevous thread, but if you ever feel llike peering outside the educated, polite, intelligent discussions on the Word website then try this:
http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/
Perez Hilton
..wouldn't like it here. And that's why I do.
I actually don't know
who that is.
You have no idea
just how very lucky you are to have not had your cultural pool pissed in by that waster of oxygen :)
Who's getting the drinks in?
I liken this community to a conversation with my mates down the pub. We moan and might not agree, but matters usually iron themselves out in the end without any need for fighting (physically or verbally).
Well, most of the time!
Me too
By and large I think the site is good natured. Unfortunately when you can't hear a voice attached to a comment it can be difficult to ascertain whether the comments you are reacting to are said slightly tongue in cheek or whether they are serious. I think also most of us probably enjoy being Devils Advocate - as an earlier poster said, not a good idea if we are discussing Religion, Politics or The Beatles.
I also think it helps
that the standard of writing and articulation is, on the whole, rather better than some other places on the web. It's nice to care about those sort of things and even better to read posts on here that are well written, intelligent (or dumb in a good way) and funny. I even delude myself that I've helped the signal to noise ratio in my time here.
Merry Christmas one and all.
I'm only grumpy...
when the piles are giving me grief.
Preparation H...
... dear boy. It will soothe the "chalfonts"
not to be sniffed at
.
Strange
...how my piles give me grief every time someone tells me how wonderful The Clash were...
The Smiths have the same effect on my 'Emma Freuds'
We must have 'audiopiles'
Coat
sir?
It's charming here
I love the Word blog because it's full of thoroughly splendid people.
I don't mind the odd grumper at all (we all have grouchy days) and I ignore the occasional trolls that pop up.
As for me, I'm never grumpy. Never ever ever ever ever.
(don't ask my FPO to verify that one)
Hang on
I didn't realise FPO was non-gender specific. I'm now worried I could be one!
FPO
My thoughts precisely. Now I'm looking at my own fun preventing tendencies!
Interesting...
It never even occurred to me that FPO could be gender-specific...!
Clearly you've both been living in denial ;-)
FPO always makes me think of this fine lady...
Living in denial?
Me? Course not......... *fits girlfriend with electronic tracking device*
Hullo trees...
...hullo birds, hullo sky.
Brilliant - I'm reading that just now!
chiz chiz, as any fule kno, ect ect
Con Coleman is uterly wet
Con Coleman is uterly wet and a weed...
I'm only Grumpy
during Pantomime season.
Oh No I'm Not.
We're not falling for that one.
He's behind you!
bugger
I'm generally grumpy-ish
But I don't let that stand in the way of my happiness.
Quickly I'll go for:
Quickly I'll go for: Afghan/Iraqi War; Banks; Rio Ferdinand earning more in one week than Finney, Matthews, Lawton (all much better players) managed in a whole career; every facet of life being considerably worse than it was 40/50 years ago.
The only way to be positive in 2009 is, surely, to completely ignore/avoid it?
But principally, quoting Dora Bryan in 'A Taste Of Honey', because..... 'we enjoy it'.
Is this the right room for an argument?
?
I've told you once.
No you haven't.
..
This
isn't an arguement
Yes
it is
I'm sorry I'm not allowed to argue anymore
But I
just paid!
No
you didn't!
Blimey...
It's like the sixth-form common room circa 1973 in here :-)
It
is not!
you say that
as if it were a bad thing...
An oasis of peace and tranquility
Compared to newspaper boards on The Independent, Guardian and Times almost everyone here seems sane and reasonable, respecting that someone else can hold a different point of view WITHOUT SHOUTING THEM DOWN.
If I find I'm interested in a story I might read a post or two in those places and then give up in despair.
Children in Need?
they can stay in bloody need. Nyeeeeehhh!!
I'm in the kitchen
DROWNING KITTENS! Nyeeeeehhh!!
You just reminded me
how bloody funny Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse used to be...
Re: "And everything seems to end in an argument."
What are the criteria and when does a debate or an exchange of opinions become an argument?
To make things clear
The Argument Sketch
A man walks into an office.
Man: (Michael Palin)
Ah. I'd like to have an argument, please.
Receptionist:
Certainly sir. Have you been here before?
Man:
No, this is my first time.
Receptionist:
I see. Well, do you want to have the full argument, or were you thinking of taking a course?
Man:
Well, what would be the cost?
Receptionist:
Well, It's one pound for a five minute argument, but only eight pounds for a course of ten.
Man:
Well, I think it's probably best if I start with the one and then see how it goes from there, okay?
Receptionist:
Fine. I'll see who's free at the moment.
(Pause)
Receptionist:
Mr. DeBakey's free, but he's a little bit conciliatory.
Ahh yes, Try Mr. Barnard; room 12.
Man:
Thank you.
(Walks down the hall. Opens door.)
Angry man:
WHADDAYOU WANT?
Man:
Well, Well, I was told outside that...
Angry man:
DON'T GIVE ME THAT, YOU SNOTTY-FACED HEAP OF PARROT DROPPINGS!
Man:
What?
Angry man:
SHUT YOUR FESTERING GOB, YOU TIT! YOUR TYPE MAKES ME PUKE! YOU VACUOUS TOFFEE-NOSED MALODOROUS PERVERT!
Man:
Yes, but I came here for an argument!!
Angry man:
OH! Oh! I'm sorry! This is abuse!
Man:
Oh! Oh I see!
Angry man:
Aha! No, you want room 12A, next door.
M:
Oh...Sorry...
Angry man:
Not at all!
(under his breath) stupid git.
(The man goes into room 12A. Another man is sitting behind a desk.)
Man:
Is this the right room for an argument?
Other Man:(John Cleese)
I've told you once.
Man:
No you haven't!
Other Man:
Yes I have.
Man:
When?
Other Man:
Just now.
Man:
No you didn't!
Other Man: Yes I did!
Man:
You didn't!
Other Man:
I did!
Man:
You didn't!
Other Man:
I'm telling you, I did!
Man:
You did not!
Other Man:
Oh I'm sorry, is this a five minute argument, or the full half hour?
Man:
Ah!
(taking out his wallet and paying)
Just the five minutes.
Other Man:
Just the five minutes. Thank you. Anyway, I did.
Man:
You most certainly did not!
Other Man:
Now let's get one thing quite clear: I most definitely told you!
Man:
Oh no you didn't!
Other Man:
Oh yes I did!
Man:
Oh no you didn't!
Other Man:
Oh yes I did!
Man:
Oh no you didn't!
Other Man:
Oh yes I did!
Man:
Oh no you didn't!
Other Man:
Oh yes I did!
Man:
Oh no you didn't!
Other Man:
Oh yes I did!
Man:
Oh no you didn't!
Other Man:
Oh yes I did!
Man:
No you DIDN'T!
Other Man:
Oh yes I did!
Man:
No you DIDN'T!
Other Man:
Oh yes I did!
Man:
No you DIDN'T!
Other Man:
Oh yes I did!
Man:
Oh look, this isn't an argument!
(pause)
Other Man:
Yes it is!
Man:
No it isn't!
(pause)
Man:
It's just contradiction!
Other Man:
No it isn't!
Man:
It IS!
Other Man:
It is NOT!
Man:
You just contradicted me!
Other Man:
No I didn't!
Man:
You DID!
Other Man:
No no no!
Man:
You did just then!
Other Man:
Nonsense!
Man:
(exasperated) Oh, this is futile!!
(pause)
Other Man:
No it isn't!
Man:
Yes it is!
(pause)
Man:
I came here for a good argument!
Other Man:
AH, no you didn't, you came here for an argument!
Man:
An argument isn't just contradiction.
Other Man:
Well! it CAN be!
Man:
No it can't!
Man:
An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition.
Other Man:
No it isn't!
Man:
Yes it is! 'tisn't just contradiction.
Other Man:
Look, if I "argue" with you, I must take up a contrary position!
Man:
Yes but it isn't just saying 'no it isn't'.
Other Man:
Yes it is!
Man:
No it isn't!
Other Man:
Yes it is!
Man:
No it isn't!
Other Man:
Yes it is!
Man:
No it ISN'T! Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
Other Man:
It is NOT!
Man:
It is!
Other Man:
Not at all!
Man:
It is!
(The Arguer hits a bell on his desk and stops.)
Other Man:
Thank you, that's it.
Man:
(stunned) What?
Other Man:
That's it. Good morning.
Man:
But I was just getting interested!
Other Man:
I'm sorry, the five minutes is up.
Man:
That was never five minutes just now!!
Other Man:
I'm afraid it was.
Man:
(leading on) No it wasn't.....
Other Man:
I'm sorry, I'm not allowed to argue any more.
Man:
WHAT??
Other Man:
If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another five minutes.
Man:
But that was never five minutes just now!
Oh Come on!
Oh this is...
This is ridiculous!
Other Man:
I told you... I told you, I'm not allowed to argue unless you PAY!
Man:
Oh all right.
(takes out his wallet and pays again.)
There you are.
Other Man:
Thank you.
Man:
(clears throat) Well...
Other Man:
Well WHAT?
Man:
That was never five minutes just now.
Other Man:
I told you, I'm not allowed to argue unless you've paid!
Man:
Well I just paid!
Other Man:
No you didn't!
Man:
I DID!!!
Other Man:
YOU didn't!
Man:
I DID!!!
Other Man:
YOU didn't!
Man:
I DID!!!
Other Man:
YOU didn't!
Man:
I DID!!!
Other Man:
YOU didn't!
Man:
I don't want to argue about it!
Other Man:
Well I'm very sorry but you didn't pay!
Man:
Ah hah! Well if I didn't pay, why are you arguing???
Ah HAAAAAAHHH! Gotcha!
Other Man:
No you haven't!
Man:
Yes I have! If you're arguing, I must have paid.
Other Man:
Not necessarily. I could be arguing in my spare time.
Man:
I've had enough of this!
Other Man:
No you haven't.
Man:
Oh shut up!
Gosh!
I'd never mb'd before - until I discovered this site. I adore the mag more than I can say and I've always found the forum to be a fascinating arena of learned debate, passionate music fandom and general guide to all- round niceness. Having said that, I once, in my cups, got into an argument here and I've ever since regretted it. but like someone said above apologies were made, mutual understanding was both established and respected while the bonhomie of this great forum was never in danger. Top marks to Fraser for his Solomon-like moderation.
Solomon like moderation?
Tell that to my two and a half kids
Grumpy my arse...
I might moan about Elbow, Twitter, modern technology and the state of the youth today but I am certainly not grumpy in my real life persona.
It's just a good place to let off steam, far more healthy than going round shooting hoodies as Michael Caine will have us believe in his latest movie.
It's quite fun to have a rant now and then, release the tension and realize there are some people out there that might just feel the same way. Most of the moans and groans about modern life being rubbish etc are pretty much tongue in cheek anyway - errr...they are aren't they?
Anyway, a happy cheery Xmas to everyone with no irony or sarcasm intended!
I have to say
I have always found the Massive in general to be a shining example of erudition and good manners in the dirty world of the web.The occasional spats are normally quickly dealt with and forgotten.
Happy Christmas one and all.
grumpy / not grumpy
I don't think this is a grumpy place. After all, the number of people who enjoy Elbow and Tom Waits (especially for "Rain Dogs") is admirable. There's no faux-hipster drivel like on Pitchfork, no angry 12 year old Maccabees fans like on NME, there's no frustrated former music journos like on Uncut, there's no navel gazing attention to detail like on Mojo, there's no "flashmobs" like on a number of 18th rate "indie" bands' forums, there is simply a rakish intent to spread wit, opinions about Richard Thompson and the wisdom that the middle-aged like to share with others.
Nothing harmless in that is there?
Hooray for Tom Waits
Just seeing someone using his name makes me happy.
Seems like a nice place to me.
And about 120% more polite and enthusiastic than any other site I can think of.
Grumpy, Cynic, Curmudgeon
All titles I've dreamt of having, and now pleased to have (and I'm not 40 yet).
Maybe it something to do with living in a house surrounded by 5 women (1 wife, 4 teenage daughters) and a female dog
Anyway: Grumbel, grumble, moan, grumble, happy christmas if you must
On the Michael Caine front...
...I just did a phone interview with the legendary Phil 'Shiva' Jones, one-time frontman of Quintessence (just in case there's any confusion with all those Phil 'Shiva' Joneses out there), and he mentioned that he was once in a Michael Caine movie, as a passing hippy.
'And did he say 'My name is Michael Caine'?' I asked.
'No,' said Phil, 'I think everyone knew who he was'.
It was either a brilliant deadpan riposte or a cultural reference that went over Phil's head (who hasn't lived in the UK since the '70s, to be fair).
Still, I thought it was funny either way. :-D
Class.
Phil 'Shiva' Jones! Seeing references to bands such as Quintessence is one of the major reasons that I love this site.
At least the Word Blog
does not follow the annoying habit on other sites of commenters typing "first" to show that they are the first to comment.
Well, I hope I haven't started something.
I don't find it grumpy here, happiness challenged perhaps, but not grumpy!
As the first to reply
to your post, may I wish you a Merry Christmas
I would like to second that.
Seventeen thousand, five hundred and fourty fifth.
I couldn't agree more.
While there has been some grumpiness
Have you seen other blogs out there ? Some of them are vile,virulent , toxic screaming matches.
Besides, the grumpiness factor increases as you get older.
I'm still sulking
about losing the test series
But on a less serious note I do tire of the "why i hate" or "why X is overrated" topics
"I Hate Threads About 'Why I Hate ..' " too
I generally try to avoid them - they only angry up the blood. I greatly prefer people sharing their enthusiasms.
I could merrily vent my spleen about some of my least favourite bands, but that doesn't actually mean much to anyone else : my huge loathing for (insert random band here, because like I said it really doesn't matter who it is that I can't stand) is not going to change the mind of people who like some of their records. I may indulge if I can be funny while doing it, or if they illustrate a specific point.
Through nudges from others here, I have found that I quite like some of the Grateful Dead - "Touch Of Grey" at least is a tuuuuuuune - and Fairport Convention. My enthusiasm for Kevin Rowland's "My Beauty" has contributed to another member of the Massive buying a copy. That's what I like about this place - the sense of community and sharing ideas.
The point is...
Sometimes those about-faces of which you speak do occur in the midst of a "so-and-so is crap thread". That's why I look at nearly all the threads, and only make a point of steering clear of one if there's nothing in it I find interesting, or if it becomes genuinely unpleasant, which it rarely does.
I still find myself wishing - occasionally - that there was a down arrow...
I still read the threads
Curiousity leads me to read them - I don't always contribute.
I don't miss the down arrows at all - if someone disagrees with a post I prefer to know why. Sometimes it's a misunderstanding. The down arrows seemed to me to be out of keeping with the vibe here.
Speaking for myself...
I entered this sphere with a confrontational know it all attitude.I was swiftly put at ease by the more senior members here.Now I think it's great.