Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Why Are People On The Word Website So Grumpy?

Davy H's picture

They are though, aren't they?

And everything seems to end in an argument.

I bet this does too.

Merry Christmas x

4

Awww

Bless you.

And Merry Christmas, one and all.

1
Fraser Lewry | 16 December 2009 - 1:35am

And To You Fraser

and everyone else at The Word and on the forum. Have a good one. Love and Peace.

0
RobertC | 16 December 2009 - 11:44am

It's like the naughty children

in class at school getting all the attention even though they're the minority. There's lot's of us happy souls here who stand around and watch the big boys fighting.
Merry Christmas!

0
Dave Amitri | 16 December 2009 - 1:45am

I don't detect much grumpiness...

..although your post is a little on the grumpy side :)

0
shane pacey | 16 December 2009 - 2:05am

Arf !

Do you wanna take it outside?

0
Davy H | 16 December 2009 - 9:17am

If you think people here are grumpy...

...then you should look elsewhere on the web. I think this site is an oasis of good manners and sunshine.

9
David Hepworth | 16 December 2009 - 7:09am

What a rare triptych...

Oasis, good manners, and sunshine.

2
Vulpes Vulpes | 16 December 2009 - 6:15pm

Surely that should be

"Oasis, good manners, and sun-sheeeeyine"

8
stimpy | 16 December 2009 - 6:27pm

It's because

we appear to have been infiltrated by a handful of spammers, last night/this morning.

Either that, or a few new members are really enthusiastic about the things they love.

0
Tom | 16 December 2009 - 7:40am

A broad range of subjects for discussion...

...usually leads to a good range of views and so people defend their positions and grumpiness occasionally ensues. But I've not seen too much rudeness or grumpiness on The Word site. The subjects are usually interesting (sometimes becoming even more so as the debate develops) and there are times where it's downright funny (as in Britney Spears being listed as one of the world's most influential people - bless!).

This is a lively site that reflects a lively and interesting magazine. The participants here strike me as being more in the Fezziwig camp, rather than that of Scrooge.

I'll now end with "Bah!", followed by the inevitable "Humbug!".

0
Baskerville Old Face | 16 December 2009 - 8:03am

I think

Other websites should aspire to our level of politeness and good humour.

0
Lucas Hare | 16 December 2009 - 8:06am

It's not that bad

There are many threads where we share our collective joy - The Word Guide To Babies being one shining example.

Despite the occasional big blowup (Did Rob Fitzpatrick read the FAQ?) we generally get along OK, clarifying differences and mostly respecting each others' views. There is a level of pedantry here (some would say "accuracy") but in the main I see that as people who really know & care a lot about the subject sharing their knowledge.

If you want proper grumpiness, try some of the other music magazine websites - I can't find the link right now but I had posted a link here to Uncut's messageboard for a piece of news and the level of swearing and offensiveness was very diferent to the banter here.

And if people want to tap into our collective experience, the people here are usually only too happy to help with advice on guitars, stereos, books, etc.

2
el hombre malo | 16 December 2009 - 8:21am

Curmudgeonly

in the nicest possible way. It's down to the age of the average poster isn't it? Things aren't what they used to be is a theme to be fair, though usually countered by some. As for arguments, it only takes one to make a personal remark - that can be enough to sour a thread and it's usually the political/religious type subjects that go that way. But then a daft punning topic will pop up soon enough to lighten things again. There's enough good vibes to keep most of us coming back for more.

0
Sven Garlic | 16 December 2009 - 8:30am

Not all bad

Negative views always seem to seem more strident than positive views when written down. I'm not sure why that is, possibly because when someone says they like something they leave it at that but negativity feels like it requires justification which then emphasises the negativity.

0
JohnW | 16 December 2009 - 8:33am

Not Too Grumpy...

I think The Massive manages to avoid the anonymity-inspired nastiness that seems to be a feature in many other places.

Sticking to the rules helps (thanks Fraser)and generally, at the first sign of a really negative / personal comment, I just stop reading - if everyone does that those threads tend to go away, although there are notable exceptions, clearly.

I laugh out loud far more than I get annoyed.

0
ainsley009 | 16 December 2009 - 9:05am

Try the BBC MBs!

You should go on some of the BBC MB's. Mention Chris Evans, Sarah Kennedy and why don't Radio 2 play more Music for the over-50s on the Radio 2 MB then watch what happens! I know because I used to get involved until I realised it wasn't worth it and my Blood Pressure has improved since!

This is definitely one of the nicest places on the Net.

Ian

0
ip29 | 16 December 2009 - 9:45am

Oh yes

I did have a look in those BBC 'boards' once. Terrifying!

0
Davy H | 16 December 2009 - 11:22am

This is what

This is what they're talking about on the BBC have your say site at the moment
http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?forumID=7347&edition=1&ttl=2...

Terrifying is indeed the right description.

0
Andy Mackenzie | 16 December 2009 - 3:36pm

When the iPlayer was still in beta,

I used to help out a little with the forum for beta testers. Bear in mind that these are people who have volunteered to get early version software to play with, and have been given special access credentials to allow them to do so, effectively giving them rights to play with several million quid's worth of development infrastructure.

Though the vast majority of the community of beta testers did a splendid job and persevered through all sorts of hiccups, an unsettling number proved to be thoroughly ungrateful bastards, and grumpy as fuck with it. We put up with (most) of them because they gave us useful feedback along with the bile, but honestly, some of them were just unpleasant people.

The ratio of splendid to unpleasant here, by contrast, is WAY better than what my experience of a self-selecting cohort of geeks suggests it can be.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 16 December 2009 - 6:25pm

Haha! I was one of those beta testers!

(I'm a not-so-secret geek, I adore software testing)

I'd like to think I was one of the pleasant ones, rather than one of the grumpy-as-fuck ones...

0
Hannah | 16 December 2009 - 11:12pm

spEak You're bRanes

I probably got this link on a prevous thread, but if you ever feel llike peering outside the educated, polite, intelligent discussions on the Word website then try this:

http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/

0
Douglas | 16 December 2009 - 6:33pm

Perez Hilton

..wouldn't like it here. And that's why I do.

0
Prestonia | 16 December 2009 - 9:44am

I actually don't know

who that is.

0
Davy H | 16 December 2009 - 11:25am

You have no idea

just how very lucky you are to have not had your cultural pool pissed in by that waster of oxygen :)

0
illuminatus | 16 December 2009 - 1:17pm

Who's getting the drinks in?

I liken this community to a conversation with my mates down the pub. We moan and might not agree, but matters usually iron themselves out in the end without any need for fighting (physically or verbally).

Well, most of the time!

1
Uncle Sil | 16 December 2009 - 9:45am

Me too

By and large I think the site is good natured. Unfortunately when you can't hear a voice attached to a comment it can be difficult to ascertain whether the comments you are reacting to are said slightly tongue in cheek or whether they are serious. I think also most of us probably enjoy being Devils Advocate - as an earlier poster said, not a good idea if we are discussing Religion, Politics or The Beatles.

0
Steve Turner | 16 December 2009 - 9:46am

I also think it helps

that the standard of writing and articulation is, on the whole, rather better than some other places on the web. It's nice to care about those sort of things and even better to read posts on here that are well written, intelligent (or dumb in a good way) and funny. I even delude myself that I've helped the signal to noise ratio in my time here.

Merry Christmas one and all.

3
illuminatus | 16 December 2009 - 1:22pm

I'm only grumpy...

when the piles are giving me grief.

1
Patrick Crowther | 16 December 2009 - 11:29am

Preparation H...

... dear boy. It will soothe the "chalfonts"

1
man.of.soup | 16 December 2009 - 1:30pm

not to be sniffed at

.

0
Mavis Diles | 17 December 2009 - 1:35pm

Strange

...how my piles give me grief every time someone tells me how wonderful The Clash were...

0
Mike_H | 20 December 2009 - 6:23pm

The Smiths have the same effect on my 'Emma Freuds'

We must have 'audiopiles'

1
stimpy | 20 December 2009 - 6:44pm

Coat

sir?

1
DogFacedBoy | 20 December 2009 - 6:53pm

It's charming here

I love the Word blog because it's full of thoroughly splendid people.
I don't mind the odd grumper at all (we all have grouchy days) and I ignore the occasional trolls that pop up.

As for me, I'm never grumpy. Never ever ever ever ever.
(don't ask my FPO to verify that one)

4
Hannah | 16 December 2009 - 11:32am

Hang on

I didn't realise FPO was non-gender specific. I'm now worried I could be one!

1
Joe R | 16 December 2009 - 12:58pm

FPO

My thoughts precisely. Now I'm looking at my own fun preventing tendencies!

0
Lucas Hare | 16 December 2009 - 1:15pm

Interesting...

It never even occurred to me that FPO could be gender-specific...!
Clearly you've both been living in denial ;-)

3
Hannah | 16 December 2009 - 11:15pm
Patrick Crowther | 17 December 2009 - 9:36am

Living in denial?

Me? Course not......... *fits girlfriend with electronic tracking device*

0
Joe R | 17 December 2009 - 9:48am

Hullo trees...

...hullo birds, hullo sky.

0
Con Coleman | 16 December 2009 - 11:52am

Brilliant - I'm reading that just now!

chiz chiz, as any fule kno, ect ect

0
Douglas | 16 December 2009 - 6:30pm

Con Coleman is uterly wet

Con Coleman is uterly wet and a weed...

0
man.of.soup | 17 December 2009 - 1:16pm

I'm only Grumpy

during Pantomime season.

Oh No I'm Not.

0
Beezer | 16 December 2009 - 11:53am

We're not falling for that one.

He's behind you!

bugger

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 16 December 2009 - 6:27pm

I'm generally grumpy-ish

But I don't let that stand in the way of my happiness.

0
Five-Centres | 16 December 2009 - 12:01pm

Quickly I'll go for:

Quickly I'll go for: Afghan/Iraqi War; Banks; Rio Ferdinand earning more in one week than Finney, Matthews, Lawton (all much better players) managed in a whole career; every facet of life being considerably worse than it was 40/50 years ago.

The only way to be positive in 2009 is, surely, to completely ignore/avoid it?

But principally, quoting Dora Bryan in 'A Taste Of Honey', because..... 'we enjoy it'.

0
ranger | 16 December 2009 - 12:05pm
Neil Dyson | 16 December 2009 - 12:21pm

I've told you once.

0
Beezer | 16 December 2009 - 1:04pm

No you haven't.

..

0
Black Type | 16 December 2009 - 1:56pm

This

isn't an arguement

0
DogFacedBoy | 16 December 2009 - 3:10pm

Yes

it is

0
Black Type | 16 December 2009 - 4:15pm
Beezer | 16 December 2009 - 5:16pm

But I

just paid!

0
DogFacedBoy | 16 December 2009 - 5:23pm

No

you didn't!

0
Black Type | 16 December 2009 - 5:56pm

Blimey...

It's like the sixth-form common room circa 1973 in here :-)

0
stimpy | 16 December 2009 - 5:59pm

It

is not!

0
DogFacedBoy | 16 December 2009 - 6:04pm

you say that

as if it were a bad thing...

1
paulwright | 16 December 2009 - 9:55pm

An oasis of peace and tranquility

Compared to newspaper boards on The Independent, Guardian and Times almost everyone here seems sane and reasonable, respecting that someone else can hold a different point of view WITHOUT SHOUTING THEM DOWN.
If I find I'm interested in a story I might read a post or two in those places and then give up in despair.

0
Carl Parker | 16 December 2009 - 1:31pm

Children in Need?

they can stay in bloody need. Nyeeeeehhh!!

0
DogFacedBoy | 16 December 2009 - 3:09pm

I'm in the kitchen

DROWNING KITTENS! Nyeeeeehhh!!

1
Joe Muggs | 16 December 2009 - 4:06pm

You just reminded me

how bloody funny Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse used to be...

0
Retro Man | 16 December 2009 - 6:16pm

Re: "And everything seems to end in an argument."

What are the criteria and when does a debate or an exchange of opinions become an argument?

0
Mark JF | 16 December 2009 - 4:47pm

To make things clear

The Argument Sketch

A man walks into an office.

Man: (Michael Palin)
Ah. I'd like to have an argument, please.

Receptionist:
Certainly sir. Have you been here before?

Man:
No, this is my first time.

Receptionist:
I see. Well, do you want to have the full argument, or were you thinking of taking a course?

Man:
Well, what would be the cost?

Receptionist:
Well, It's one pound for a five minute argument, but only eight pounds for a course of ten.

Man:
Well, I think it's probably best if I start with the one and then see how it goes from there, okay?

Receptionist:
Fine. I'll see who's free at the moment.

(Pause)

Receptionist:
Mr. DeBakey's free, but he's a little bit conciliatory.
Ahh yes, Try Mr. Barnard; room 12.

Man:
Thank you.
(Walks down the hall. Opens door.)

Angry man:
WHADDAYOU WANT?

Man:
Well, Well, I was told outside that...

Angry man:
DON'T GIVE ME THAT, YOU SNOTTY-FACED HEAP OF PARROT DROPPINGS!

Man:
What?

Angry man:
SHUT YOUR FESTERING GOB, YOU TIT! YOUR TYPE MAKES ME PUKE! YOU VACUOUS TOFFEE-NOSED MALODOROUS PERVERT!

Man:
Yes, but I came here for an argument!!

Angry man:
OH! Oh! I'm sorry! This is abuse!

Man:
Oh! Oh I see!

Angry man:
Aha! No, you want room 12A, next door.

M:
Oh...Sorry...

Angry man:
Not at all!
(under his breath) stupid git.

(The man goes into room 12A. Another man is sitting behind a desk.)

Man:
Is this the right room for an argument?

Other Man:(John Cleese)
I've told you once.

Man:
No you haven't!

Other Man:
Yes I have.

Man:
When?

Other Man:
Just now.

Man:
No you didn't!

Other Man: Yes I did!

Man:
You didn't!

Other Man:
I did!

Man:
You didn't!

Other Man:
I'm telling you, I did!

Man:
You did not!

Other Man:
Oh I'm sorry, is this a five minute argument, or the full half hour?

Man:
Ah!
(taking out his wallet and paying)
Just the five minutes.

Other Man:
Just the five minutes. Thank you. Anyway, I did.

Man:
You most certainly did not!

Other Man:
Now let's get one thing quite clear: I most definitely told you!

Man:
Oh no you didn't!

Other Man:
Oh yes I did!

Man:
Oh no you didn't!

Other Man:
Oh yes I did!

Man:
Oh no you didn't!

Other Man:
Oh yes I did!

Man:
Oh no you didn't!

Other Man:
Oh yes I did!

Man:
Oh no you didn't!

Other Man:
Oh yes I did!

Man:
Oh no you didn't!

Other Man:
Oh yes I did!

Man:
No you DIDN'T!

Other Man:
Oh yes I did!

Man:
No you DIDN'T!

Other Man:
Oh yes I did!

Man:
No you DIDN'T!

Other Man:
Oh yes I did!

Man:
Oh look, this isn't an argument!

(pause)

Other Man:
Yes it is!

Man:
No it isn't!

(pause)

Man:
It's just contradiction!

Other Man:
No it isn't!

Man:
It IS!

Other Man:
It is NOT!

Man:
You just contradicted me!

Other Man:
No I didn't!

Man:
You DID!

Other Man:
No no no!

Man:
You did just then!

Other Man:
Nonsense!

Man:
(exasperated) Oh, this is futile!!

(pause)

Other Man:
No it isn't!

Man:
Yes it is!

(pause)

Man:
I came here for a good argument!

Other Man:
AH, no you didn't, you came here for an argument!

Man:
An argument isn't just contradiction.

Other Man:
Well! it CAN be!

Man:
No it can't!

Man:
An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition.

Other Man:
No it isn't!

Man:
Yes it is! 'tisn't just contradiction.

Other Man:
Look, if I "argue" with you, I must take up a contrary position!

Man:
Yes but it isn't just saying 'no it isn't'.

Other Man:
Yes it is!

Man:
No it isn't!

Other Man:
Yes it is!

Man:
No it isn't!

Other Man:
Yes it is!

Man:
No it ISN'T! Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.

Other Man:
It is NOT!

Man:
It is!

Other Man:
Not at all!

Man:
It is!

(The Arguer hits a bell on his desk and stops.)

Other Man:
Thank you, that's it.

Man:
(stunned) What?

Other Man:
That's it. Good morning.

Man:
But I was just getting interested!

Other Man:
I'm sorry, the five minutes is up.

Man:
That was never five minutes just now!!

Other Man:
I'm afraid it was.

Man:
(leading on) No it wasn't.....

Other Man:
I'm sorry, I'm not allowed to argue any more.

Man:
WHAT??

Other Man:
If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another five minutes.

Man:
But that was never five minutes just now!
Oh Come on!
Oh this is...
This is ridiculous!

Other Man:
I told you... I told you, I'm not allowed to argue unless you PAY!

Man:
Oh all right.
(takes out his wallet and pays again.)
There you are.

Other Man:
Thank you.

Man:
(clears throat) Well...

Other Man:
Well WHAT?

Man:
That was never five minutes just now.

Other Man:
I told you, I'm not allowed to argue unless you've paid!

Man:
Well I just paid!

Other Man:
No you didn't!

Man:
I DID!!!

Other Man:
YOU didn't!

Man:
I DID!!!

Other Man:
YOU didn't!

Man:
I DID!!!

Other Man:
YOU didn't!

Man:
I DID!!!

Other Man:
YOU didn't!

Man:
I don't want to argue about it!

Other Man:
Well I'm very sorry but you didn't pay!

Man:
Ah hah! Well if I didn't pay, why are you arguing???
Ah HAAAAAAHHH! Gotcha!

Other Man:
No you haven't!

Man:
Yes I have! If you're arguing, I must have paid.

Other Man:
Not necessarily. I could be arguing in my spare time.

Man:
I've had enough of this!

Other Man:
No you haven't.

Man:
Oh shut up!

2
Ola Claesson | 17 December 2009 - 12:14pm

Gosh!

I'd never mb'd before - until I discovered this site. I adore the mag more than I can say and I've always found the forum to be a fascinating arena of learned debate, passionate music fandom and general guide to all- round niceness. Having said that, I once, in my cups, got into an argument here and I've ever since regretted it. but like someone said above apologies were made, mutual understanding was both established and respected while the bonhomie of this great forum was never in danger. Top marks to Fraser for his Solomon-like moderation.

0
Vorgongod | 16 December 2009 - 4:56pm

Solomon like moderation?

Tell that to my two and a half kids

4
DogFacedBoy | 16 December 2009 - 6:06pm

Grumpy my arse...

I might moan about Elbow, Twitter, modern technology and the state of the youth today but I am certainly not grumpy in my real life persona.

It's just a good place to let off steam, far more healthy than going round shooting hoodies as Michael Caine will have us believe in his latest movie.

It's quite fun to have a rant now and then, release the tension and realize there are some people out there that might just feel the same way. Most of the moans and groans about modern life being rubbish etc are pretty much tongue in cheek anyway - errr...they are aren't they?

Anyway, a happy cheery Xmas to everyone with no irony or sarcasm intended!

0
Retro Man | 16 December 2009 - 6:14pm

I have to say

I have always found the Massive in general to be a shining example of erudition and good manners in the dirty world of the web.The occasional spats are normally quickly dealt with and forgotten.
Happy Christmas one and all.

0
Chris Young | 16 December 2009 - 6:30pm

grumpy / not grumpy

I don't think this is a grumpy place. After all, the number of people who enjoy Elbow and Tom Waits (especially for "Rain Dogs") is admirable. There's no faux-hipster drivel like on Pitchfork, no angry 12 year old Maccabees fans like on NME, there's no frustrated former music journos like on Uncut, there's no navel gazing attention to detail like on Mojo, there's no "flashmobs" like on a number of 18th rate "indie" bands' forums, there is simply a rakish intent to spread wit, opinions about Richard Thompson and the wisdom that the middle-aged like to share with others.

Nothing harmless in that is there?

0
badger_king | 16 December 2009 - 6:36pm

Hooray for Tom Waits

Just seeing someone using his name makes me happy.

1
Stephen Merrick | 16 December 2009 - 11:01pm

Seems like a nice place to me.

And about 120% more polite and enthusiastic than any other site I can think of.

0
Mr Fade | 16 December 2009 - 6:39pm

Grumpy, Cynic, Curmudgeon

All titles I've dreamt of having, and now pleased to have (and I'm not 40 yet).
Maybe it something to do with living in a house surrounded by 5 women (1 wife, 4 teenage daughters) and a female dog

Anyway: Grumbel, grumble, moan, grumble, happy christmas if you must

0
Rigid Digit | 16 December 2009 - 7:38pm

On the Michael Caine front...

...I just did a phone interview with the legendary Phil 'Shiva' Jones, one-time frontman of Quintessence (just in case there's any confusion with all those Phil 'Shiva' Joneses out there), and he mentioned that he was once in a Michael Caine movie, as a passing hippy.

'And did he say 'My name is Michael Caine'?' I asked.

'No,' said Phil, 'I think everyone knew who he was'.

It was either a brilliant deadpan riposte or a cultural reference that went over Phil's head (who hasn't lived in the UK since the '70s, to be fair).

Still, I thought it was funny either way. :-D

1
Colin H | 16 December 2009 - 8:22pm

Class.

Phil 'Shiva' Jones! Seeing references to bands such as Quintessence is one of the major reasons that I love this site.

0
RobertC | 17 December 2009 - 12:07pm

At least the Word Blog

does not follow the annoying habit on other sites of commenters typing "first" to show that they are the first to comment.

Well, I hope I haven't started something.

I don't find it grumpy here, happiness challenged perhaps, but not grumpy!

0
David Sutherland | 16 December 2009 - 9:37pm

As the first to reply

to your post, may I wish you a Merry Christmas

0
Los Aromas | 16 December 2009 - 11:11pm

I would like to second that.

0
Ola Claesson | 17 December 2009 - 12:16pm

Seventeen thousand, five hundred and fourty fifth.

I couldn't agree more.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 17 December 2009 - 2:46pm

While there has been some grumpiness

Have you seen other blogs out there ? Some of them are vile,virulent , toxic screaming matches.
Besides, the grumpiness factor increases as you get older.

0
On The Fence | 17 December 2009 - 6:02am

I'm still sulking

about losing the test series

But on a less serious note I do tire of the "why i hate" or "why X is overrated" topics

0
Junior Wells | 17 December 2009 - 6:23am

"I Hate Threads About 'Why I Hate ..' " too

I generally try to avoid them - they only angry up the blood. I greatly prefer people sharing their enthusiasms.

I could merrily vent my spleen about some of my least favourite bands, but that doesn't actually mean much to anyone else : my huge loathing for (insert random band here, because like I said it really doesn't matter who it is that I can't stand) is not going to change the mind of people who like some of their records. I may indulge if I can be funny while doing it, or if they illustrate a specific point.

Through nudges from others here, I have found that I quite like some of the Grateful Dead - "Touch Of Grey" at least is a tuuuuuuune - and Fairport Convention. My enthusiasm for Kevin Rowland's "My Beauty" has contributed to another member of the Massive buying a copy. That's what I like about this place - the sense of community and sharing ideas.

1
el hombre malo | 17 December 2009 - 8:05am

The point is...

Sometimes those about-faces of which you speak do occur in the midst of a "so-and-so is crap thread". That's why I look at nearly all the threads, and only make a point of steering clear of one if there's nothing in it I find interesting, or if it becomes genuinely unpleasant, which it rarely does.

I still find myself wishing - occasionally - that there was a down arrow...

0
Theo Zoffrok | 17 December 2009 - 11:55am

I still read the threads

Curiousity leads me to read them - I don't always contribute.

I don't miss the down arrows at all - if someone disagrees with a post I prefer to know why. Sometimes it's a misunderstanding. The down arrows seemed to me to be out of keeping with the vibe here.

0
el hombre malo | 17 December 2009 - 1:57pm

Speaking for myself...

I entered this sphere with a confrontational know it all attitude.I was swiftly put at ease by the more senior members here.Now I think it's great.

0
bricameron | 17 December 2009 - 6:49am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd