Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Which non-Word journalists do you like?

Barry Womm's picture

This may not be the most appropriate place to ask this question, but I'd be interested to know which non-Word journalists are enjoyed by The Massive. Music-wise, I've always liked John Harris in print, although he seems to be terribly smug whenever I've seen him on TV. As far as columnists go, I used to buy The Independent purely to read Deborah Orr, but had to stop eventually because James Lawton's ramblings towards the back of the same paper were so anger-inducingly tedious that I begrudged handing over my money.

Any other suggestions?

0

Alexis Petridis

Guardian on a Friday. I find myself reading stuff about artists I don't even like and normally have little interest in, just for the quality of his writing.

0
Joe Robert | 13 August 2009 - 4:27pm

Marina Hyde

and Charlie Brooker. They make the grauniad worthwhile along with the political funnyman...forgot his name.

0
Mr Fade | 13 August 2009 - 4:27pm

Political funnyman

The excellent Simon Hoggart.

0
Carl Parker | 13 August 2009 - 6:47pm

The New Yorker trinity

of Anthony Lane, Adam Gopnik and Malcolm Gladwell. Not only is Lane laugh-out-loud funny as a film reviewer ("what is the point of Demi Moore?"), he really knows his stuff and has an extremely wide frame of reference. Even though it was published a while back "Nobody's Perfect" is a great collection of his work. And his taste is almost entirely congruent with mine.

Gopnik is an elegant, thoughtful writer on just about anything. His book about living in Paris ("From Paris to the Moon") is insightful and moving.

Gladwell's ability to demystify science/psychology and sociology has made him a star through his books. His regular New Yorker pieces are compelling and always thought-provoking. And he's an oddly charismatic speaker.

0
Rufus T Firefly | 13 August 2009 - 4:31pm

quartet

you missed David Sedaris

0
James Blast | 13 August 2009 - 5:08pm

American journalism

is a cut above British - imho. Although Lane is a Brit I know.

For balanced, informed, well researched comment I go to New Yorker, NY Times, Washington Post - in which David Ignatius is an urbane and perceptive voice

Also Jeff Jarvis - brilliant on the changing face of media. Sad news revealed this week that he has prostate cancer.

Closer to home - it's the girls who do it for me - Barabara Ellen, India Knight, Kathryn Flett, Nancy Banks-Smith, Marina Hyde...

0
Sheev | 14 August 2009 - 10:10am

Non-Word journalist

You mean there are other magazines/papers?

(I could mention some Swedish names that wouldn´t mean much to anyone else around here.)

0
Ola Claesson | 13 August 2009 - 4:35pm

Indeed

I do not 'like' jounalists, in the same way that I do not 'like'
fishcounters at a supermarket. If I I have a happy experience with someone in the process and maybe them with me, it's a good thing. It depends entirely on what I get and they get. It's not about like. However, I think that Stuart Maconie's cutesy photos in the Radio Times i.e. same smiling face as loveable mouse, weather reporter, flower arranger for the stars, are better than any over the counter laxative that I could possibly find legally in the EU. What happened Stuart ?

0
RobertC | 13 August 2009 - 4:55pm

Svenska journalister

Jan Gradvall är en bra skribent, tycker jag. Och jag brukar också läsa Nils Hansson musikartiklar i DN.

0
duco01 | 13 August 2009 - 6:16pm

Hej!

Jag "följer" dessutom Mats Olsson (även om jag inte är intresserad av sport), Malena Rydell, Andres Lokko och Fredrik Strage samt saknar Lennart Persson.

0
Ola Claesson | 13 August 2009 - 8:11pm

Two Words

Ben. And Goldacre.

0
Caerys | 13 August 2009 - 4:40pm

Absolutely.

Seconded. And thirded as well, if possible.

0
Lenny Law | 13 August 2009 - 6:35pm

Fifthed

Funny and important. A good combination

0
sjc1970 | 13 August 2009 - 8:26pm

Sorry

Forget to mention that Giles Coren is a bollocks.

0
RobertC | 13 August 2009 - 4:59pm

Seconded

He certainly is.

0
Four Eyes | 13 August 2009 - 5:11pm

Thirded

So true. Piggish table manners too.

0
Rufus T Firefly | 13 August 2009 - 5:59pm

Clive James

I sometimes imagine a monthly column from him in't Word

0
James Blast | 13 August 2009 - 5:02pm

For God's Sake Man !

Is it via a mirror, backwards, after the Lord's Prayer has been said in reverse three times !

0
RobertC | 13 August 2009 - 5:21pm

Sorry Jamso

where exactly did I go meringue?

0
James Blast | 13 August 2009 - 8:36pm

Sorry There Old Boy

Just something nabout the bugger gives me the vapours. Did he sire Dara O' Breeeeyanne in some eilicit backstairs wrestle ? Can't stand him either.

0
RobertC | 14 August 2009 - 10:12am

I would love it if Clive James...

could feature on the weekly podcast one time. It would be brilliant.

0
Patrick Crowther | 13 August 2009 - 6:38pm

Don't tempt so!

Fantastic plan, already no doubt has passed across the Hepworth/Ellen synapses.

According to his website Mr James has uploaded swathes of his Radio Four 'A Point of View' talks. But I can't be completely certain because I haven't clicked on to listen yet.

Have a look anyway. There are also full downloads of a few of his 'Postcard' tv documentaries on there too. It's becoming an absolute gold mine of a site.

0
Beezer | 14 August 2009 - 10:14am

Nancy Banks-Smith

I rarely watch TV but always find time to read NB-S, the Guadian's irregular TV critic. She possesses an enviably beautiful style and a genuinely lovely way with words.

0
Four Eyes | 13 August 2009 - 5:07pm

Well said

It's a pity that so many of her rare reviews these days are about soaps, which I don't watch. I didn't see My Street either; I wish I had but I doubt that I would have enjoyed it more than her review: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/feb/22/television.tvandradioarts

0
Gatz | 13 August 2009 - 9:51pm

Yeah

whenever I see her occasional columns in the Grauniad I make a beeline for them. Wonderful.

Votes also for :

Ben Goldacre
Simon Hoggart
Brooker
I used to love Martin Johnson's acerbic cricket writing. Haven't seen any for a while.

0
illuminatus | 13 August 2009 - 10:57pm

That's because Martin Johnson writes for The Sunday Times

He probably writes for The Times during the rest of the week. I haven't looked.

Boris Johnson, at a Spectator editorial meeting, criticised an absent colleague for deserting The Daily Telegraph for The Times. Someone mentioned the 100% pay increase he had received for doing so. Boris shut up and dreamt a little.

0
Robin Clarke | 15 August 2009 - 5:32pm

I wondered

where he is these days. It's terible but I don't even remember which paper I used to read him in. It was irrelevant really as I only read it for his writing...

0
illuminatus | 16 August 2009 - 7:35pm

Caitlin Moran

She has a column in the Times on Mondays where she writes about whatever she wants and also does the TV review on Saturdays plus some occasional pieces. She's usually entertaining, funny and spot-on. (I think she has occasionally contributed to Word however, which may disqualify her from this topic!).

0
Stephen G | 13 August 2009 - 5:22pm

The word smug was invented for her

I'm not a fan. She's still precocious.

0
Five-Centres | 14 August 2009 - 9:52am

Yep.

Indeed.

0
Adman | 14 August 2009 - 10:00am

Precocious, Elle?

Can someone still be considered precocious when they're in their mid-thirties?

0
Stephen G | 14 August 2009 - 10:17am

Precociousness

I've no particular view on Ms Moran, whose writing I sometimes enjoy, but this reminds me a line from Haruki Murakami's Kafka on the Shore, where the mysterious librarian tells the protagonist that his boss was precocious as a girl, and like a lot of precocious young people she had a lot of trouble becoming an adult.
It's an insight I have found useful to apply frequently since.

0
Gatz | 14 August 2009 - 10:36am

That's what I mean

0
Five-Centres | 14 August 2009 - 12:09pm

Taylor Parkes

Who you never read in print anywhere much these days more's the pity. He does bits in Quietus once in a while. Easily the best Maker/NME journalist from 'my era' (pre- and post-Britpop i guess you could call it).
No offence to the rest!

0
sandamiano | 13 August 2009 - 5:41pm

I might well have liked his writing

if I hadn't gone to school with him.
Bitter, frustrated, failed rock musician. Like many others. (Me included...)

Must add that I'm sure he is a perfectly decent chap & that his talent for writing was evident at an early stage.
These school days things run deep.

0
Adman | 13 August 2009 - 7:55pm
SpaceBoy | 13 August 2009 - 5:50pm

MacUser

he used to have the closing column at the end of MacUser, then he and the late great Tony Tyler did alternative issues. When Bywater went elsewhere CSM filled the slot... goes all misty eyed and remembers having an whole 16k of RAM in my work's Mac and colleagues asking why I needed so much...

0
James Blast | 13 August 2009 - 8:52pm

Frank Gardner

Earned his stripes the hard way, courageous, extremely knowledge and proper RP voice.

0
Steerpike | 13 August 2009 - 5:50pm

The Observer

I really like Andrew Rawnsley on politics, Nick Cohen on general columnly stuff and Victoria Coren for some smart humour. I always like David Aronovitch (?) and Alexi Sayle's Indy columns are frequently excellent.

Oh, and it is nice to see CSM in Word at last. Whoops, I went off piste.

0
Twangothan | 13 August 2009 - 6:05pm

Peter Bradshaw

Also writes in Guardian on a Friday (along with Alexis Petridis mentioned in the first post). Intelligent and witty film reviews - I always end up reading every one rather than skimming.

0
dilbert01 | 13 August 2009 - 6:06pm

Bradshaw's review of Guy Ritchie's

last fim (Gotcha?) was utterly hilarious. Had me in stitches...can't find it on the web.

0
Mr Fade | 13 August 2009 - 6:23pm
dilbert01 | 13 August 2009 - 6:32pm

That's it!

He should have got an award for that, one of the best reviews I've ever read.

0
Mr Fade | 13 August 2009 - 6:38pm

Brilliant!

I imagine he'll have watched these events with interest:

0
DougieJ | 13 August 2009 - 9:19pm

That is

brilliant - proppa supa!

0
Sheev | 14 August 2009 - 2:10pm

Matthew Norman

is good on sport and politics in various papers. His media column in the Indie on Mondays is particularly good and usually raises a laugh, especially when he railing against "Mad Mel" Phillips or John "Gaunty" Gaunt.

I usually read David Aronovitch even though his pomposity can sometimes get in the way. Ditto for Ben Goldacre. Like Mr Wonn I really like Deborah Orr. But occasionally just for the sheer rubber necking fun of it, I dig out Michael Winner and his Sunday Times column Winner's Dinners.

0
BigJimBob | 13 August 2009 - 6:26pm

Hugo Rifkind

In The Thunderer is amusing when the mood takes him. Giles Coren gets on my tits. The Telegraph's art critic Richard Dorment is always compelling - explains things beautifully and simply, points out lots of bits you'd never normally pick up on and is, at the same, gloriously pompous in an inoffensive old-school-tie, smells-faintly-of-good-claret-and-cigars type of way. Sort of like Henry Blofeld.

0
Lenny Law | 13 August 2009 - 6:40pm

Giles Coren

If I were a sub-editor I would wilfully defenestrate his copy, just to piss him off and enjoy winding him up. He's not a bad writer when the mood takes him but his dad was in a different league altogether; he possibly wasn't even playing the same game. I miss the old duffer on The News Quiz and in print

0
illuminatus | 18 August 2009 - 8:35pm

Robert Fisk

Probably the most knowledgeable journalist on Middle East Affairs. His commentary pieces in The Independent are always worth reading.

Jason Burke, who is also good on the Middle East and well informed on terrorism. He writes for The Guardian and the Observer. His book on Al-Qaeda is very relevatory.

From the above I'm another Ben Goldacre fan.

Has anyone mentioned David Lacey, football writer from The Guardian? Always measured and unhysterical.

0
Carl Parker | 13 August 2009 - 6:46pm

Hear Hear Robert Fisk

I have only heard him on the BBC World Service but he takes the trouble to find out what's actually going on. A Proper Journalist.

Wonder what he listens to?

0
Mousey | 14 August 2009 - 9:28am

Bob and Ben

Another vote for Robert Fisk. His books are brilliant but too long - can be very off putting. He promises the next one will be shorter.

Ben Goldacre is doing the world a favour by putting the boot into the con artists and snake oil salesmen who plague our times.

0
paulwright | 14 August 2009 - 11:07am

Ben again...

Yes, a fascinating piece on his blog about how the peer review process can be undermined and errors or deliberate misinformation can spread virally through a network:

http://www.badscience.net/2009/08/how-myths-are-made/

0
DougieJ | 14 August 2009 - 11:27am

Fisk

Re what he listens to, he did actually do an episode of Private Passions on R3 a few months ago, playlist is here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio3/privatepassions/pip/85cac/

0
SpaceBoy | 14 August 2009 - 12:40pm

A Fisk sceptic writes

Based on the recommendations above, I sought out some pieces by Fisk as I hadn't read any of his work before. Have to say I was disappointed to read it was just more of the same colonial guilt-tripping that's de rigeur these days.

Above all, his indulging of the Islamist fantasy that all would be right with the world if Israel was (to quote that nice Mr. Ahmedinijad) wiped off the face of the earth. To point out how absurd that notion is, you only have to think of a parallel situation in which a small European country (Luxembourg perhaps) was in territorial conflict with an Islamic state who were felt to be the aggressors. By the logic of this argument, 'we' (white European Christians) would then have justification to launch attacks on 'them' (random Muslims anywhere in the world) to avenge this territorial outrage.

Seems to me his perceived strength (he has lived in the Middle East for many years) could be his downfall as virulent anti-Semitism is probably bound to seep in after a while. Knowing a society's views well (as, sadly, I've no doubt he does) does not necessitate supporting them and propogating them on their behalf. As if the above wasn't bad enough, I see he's also a '9/11 truther'. Enough said.

Then again, to quote another Word poster (sorry, name escapes me), I could be wrong about this. I don't actually know what I'm talking about.

0
DougieJ | 18 August 2009 - 7:58pm

If you can quote

anything where Robert Fisk suggests that Israel should be wiped off the face of the earth I'll ask Fraser to delete my recommendation.
I find Fisk even handed in his criticism. He's certainly no Islamist. He voices opinions that both sides find uncomfortable, that's for sure.
I was unaware he was a 9/11 truther. However to what degree? Is he one of those who says the USA itself destroyed the towers or someone who states that there are still aspects, especially on the intelligence side, that remain unexplained?

0
Carl Parker | 18 August 2009 - 11:01pm

Don't want to indulge in 'Fisking'*

*the cutting and pasting of selective quotes, with inserted criticism

It's not that he himself believes that Israel should be wiped off the face of the earth, it's that (as I said) he indulges the fantasies of those who do believe this, by broadening this specific (and at least partly genuine) grievance of the Palestinians into a general Muslim cause that can be used to some extent to justify acts of terrorism / insurgency / radicalism, call it what you will.

He uses phrases like 'we have no business occupying Muslim lands' but again, you only have to invert that to see how it sounds - 'Christian lands' instead of 'Muslim lands'. That's far too general a stance for me - that there are *no* circumstances in which 'our' forces should set foot in 'their' lands. Is the US 'occupying' Germany? They have bases there after all.

0
DougieJ | 18 August 2009 - 11:24pm

Fisk on 9/11

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-even-...

sounds like he's been in the Middle East too long, if you ask me ... but really, what do I know ...

0
SpaceBoy | 19 August 2009 - 12:01am

Slightly worrying

use of the third person in the article. Funny how you never see him and Bargepole together isn't it? ;-)

0
DougieJ | 19 August 2009 - 12:14am

Fisk on 9/11

From that article: "Let me repeat. I am not a conspiracy theorist. Spare me the ravers. Spare me the plots. But like everyone else, I would like to know the full story of 9/11, not least because it was the trigger for the whole lunatic, meretricious "war on terror" which has led us to disaster in Iraq and Afghanistan and in much of the Middle East."
Clearly he's asking questions about the gaps in the intelligence. Don't try and smear him by lumping him in with the lunatics.
There are gaps in the July 7th narrative (as Charles Clarke chose to label it) as well. That doesn't make me a 7/7 "truther". I have no doubts that Mohammed Siddique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Hussain and Germaine Lindsay were the bombers, but there are gaps in that narrative that haven't been explained. It may be that they can't be explained, because the people who should know don't know. Being sceptical about the completeness of the official version is just that, scepticism.

0
Carl Parker | 19 August 2009 - 8:48am

Sorry

just for clarity-I wouldn't "lump him in", I just wasn't that impressed with that piece compared to some of his best. I am sure he has an independent mind.

0
SpaceBoy | 19 August 2009 - 8:56am

It's just that

you can take any event (car crash, whatever) and retrospectively find anomalies, patterns, coincidences or things which 'just don't add up'. To use a frivolous example, more in mainstream Word territory - the 'Paul is Dead' rumours. If you were of a mind (and many people were) you could find a wealth of apparently convincing signs pointing to a sinister cover up. I'm not suggesting Fisk is a 'raver' but by aligning his hefty journalistic reputation with those who are, he doesn't do us or them any favours imho. The empathising with suicide bombers is another example - 'I of course condemn this outrage, but on the other hand I can see where they're coming from'.

0
DougieJ | 19 August 2009 - 9:28am

"the whole lunatic, meretricious

"war on terror" which has led us to disaster in Iraq and Afghanistan and in much of the Middle East."

I can see little that's arguable in that statement

I was struck by the podcast recently with Patrick Hennessey who came across as resourceful, intelligent, considered and undoubtedly brave. I knew another similar who died in Afghanistan.

I have no doubt that Islamic fundamentalism is a dire threat. That we must seek to eradicate it is unquestionable. However, attempting to do so by alienating almost the entire Muslim world does not seem productive.

Whilst I do find some of Fisk's analysis untenable, I know from having lived and worked in the Middle East and Indonesia, that he is,broadly speaking, right about the imgage of the West that is being engendered in the Middle East and the broader Islamic world.

If any war has a point - it must have a purpose, a remit, an outcome and an exit strategy. I can see none of these visible in the "war on terror".

If this is an argument about taking sides, I am on the side of freedom and democracy and the free market - I cannot see how our actions currently are furthering any of these.

0
Sheev | 19 August 2009 - 9:39am

Fair enough

I just find the prevailing 'war is, like, a bad scene, man' view a bit too comfortable. As if 'peace' is a walk in the park (despite Michael Moore's best efforts to portray this in his seminal work of 'truthtelling' Fahrenheit 9/11).

Positive news stories from Iraq or Afghanistan (like the huge election turnouts) are always portrayed as 'outliers' to the general 'we're all doomed' consensus, which is taken as accepted fact. Of course things have been extremely difficult since 2001, but apparently some people need a gentle reminder that 9/11 was planned during the cuddly Clinton/Gore years.

0
DougieJ | 19 August 2009 - 9:50am

Quite reasonably

Fisk will sue anyone who calls him anti-semitic. He is not - though some people try to lable him as such to discredit him. He identifies Israel as a grievence with Islamic people - which it is. And Israelis can quite reasonably fee aggrevied with the people attacking them. I've never read anything in suggests that there is a solution apart from finding a way to get along together - but he strongly doubts this will happen.

I think Fisk's most interesting question on 9/11 is "why did these people want to do this to the West?". Just saying they are evil is not a sufficient answer. (and no I am not suffering neo-colonial guilt, or excusing terrorists).

Off to listen to music now - more Word territory.

0
paulwright | 19 August 2009 - 10:50am

But that's my point

'Israel is a grievance with Islamic people'. Why? Palestinians, yes, but all Muslims? Makes no more sense than my Luxembourgian scenario.

0
DougieJ | 19 August 2009 - 11:40am

Rod Liddle

is usually worth reading.

0
Mark JF | 13 August 2009 - 6:48pm

Marina Hyde

Another vote for the wonderful Marina. Her Friday celeb pages are so funny. The likes of Lady Macca and Trudy Styler must really despise her, so she must be doing something right.

0
Johan | 13 August 2009 - 9:11pm

She's funny

But sometimes I haven't got a clue what she's on about. Her style is meandering. But her targets are spot on. She knows how to burst a bubble.

0
Five-Centres | 14 August 2009 - 9:54am

Laura Barton

Her Hail Hail Rock n Roll columns for The Guardian are delightfully well written.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/sep/12/popandrock.laurabarton

0
McLongWhiteCloud | 13 August 2009 - 10:48pm

Quite right

and I'm pleased to see she's also a Word journalist this month

0
Paul Thompson | 14 August 2009 - 12:32am

thanks for the link

great piece

0
Mousey | 14 August 2009 - 9:26am

Yes!

Glad to see that I am not the only fan of Laura. Her Guardian columns are my favourite pieces of music writing - so much better than the usual ladschool rock journalism. She is much more subtle and insightful about music than most, and has had me scurrying to Spotify on many occasions to find some new delights. Worth her weight in gold.

0
ian | 14 August 2009 - 11:18am

John Pilger...

whoever he's writing for. Wonderful.

0
Patrick Crowther | 14 August 2009 - 9:18am

Absolutley Patrick

I had somehow not thought of John Pilger in all this because, for me, he exists on an altogther different level of excellence and integrity. Best recommendation of the lot.

0
RobertC | 14 August 2009 - 11:03am

His work is of the utmost importance...

and I respect him immensely. I've been watching all his documentaries over the last few months and I have learnt so much from them. Truly a top bloke.

0
Patrick Crowther | 14 August 2009 - 11:07am

That Is Why

his work is often sidelined and scheduled according to the whims of the corrupt. He educates and tells the truth. This doesn't go down well. The man is priceless.

0
RobertC | 14 August 2009 - 11:17am

We should cherish the fact that we can still read and watch...

what he has to say, because I doubt very much that the mainstream media (especially televison producers) will encourage anyone else to carry on his line of journalism when he finally calls it a day. A Michael Moore, perhaps... but let's not get started on him.

0
Patrick Crowther | 14 August 2009 - 11:34am

No, lets

You don't see Pilger and Moore as polemicists then? You may still think they play a valuable role, but to present them as 'truthtellers' is highly debatable imho...

I have several reservations about Pilger but even I can see he is in a different league to Moore. Don't you agree?

0
DougieJ | 14 August 2009 - 11:53am

Chris Ayres

Times reporter.
His books, 'Death by Leisure' and 'War Reporting for Cowards' are fantastic

0
tkdmart | 14 August 2009 - 11:40am

Seconded

Death by Leisure is terrific - not read the other one you mention.

Does he still write regularly for The Times?

0
Sheev | 14 August 2009 - 2:02pm

Yes

Plenty on Times website about Jackson, Hefner's recent house sale etc

0
tkdmart | 14 August 2009 - 9:16pm

thanks - and also may I recommend Geoff Dyer

author of the quite brilliant "But Beautiful" - a Guardian contributor

0
Sheev | 14 August 2009 - 11:27pm

Giles Coren

is a double bollocks. Nepotism or Necromancy ?

0
RobertC | 15 August 2009 - 6:31pm

Justification re. necromancy

Although his father could be amusing, he had a more than accidental ability to stumble into other peoples jokes. He was also in the New Yardbirds, briefly. on Moog. Percy did not get his way and began to deveop an unhealthy fascinaion with relative normality vis a vis gnomes . ( I am considering seeking treatment, I promise, but too so many steps.. f'narr )

0
RobertC | 15 August 2009 - 6:42pm
Doods | 20 August 2009 - 12:20am

I wonder

if he excoriated a sub for 'vandalising' his work.

However, on this occasion, the review is so good that I'll forgive him. That's a great review, which is unusual for a restaurant critic.

Thinking of such things, for an all too short period in 2004-2005 Victor Lewis Smith did some restaurant reviews for the Guardian. He reviewed an East End pie and mash shop utterly unironically and gave it a great review.

Reviews:
Roka: http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2005/feb/26/foodanddrink.shopping

Little Chef - A65 near Clapham, Lancs.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2005/apr/02/foodanddrink.shopping...

Audrey's Fish And Chip Shop, Bridlington, East Yorkshire
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2005/apr/23/foodanddrink.shopping...

Manze's Pie & Mash Shop London SE1
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2004/sep/25/foodanddrink.shopping...

0
illuminatus | 20 August 2009 - 8:56pm

A good writer in a crap paper

- to, wit London giveway Metro - is Marina O'Loughliin.

Articulate, acerbic and - above all - anonymous. A great asset in a restaurant reviewer

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2006/feb/27/pressandpublishing.food

0
Sheev | 20 August 2009 - 9:59pm

Has no one mentioned Matthew Parris yet?

I find his column in the Times on Saturdays compulsive reading - erudite, polite, razor sharp, penetrating, informed... the velvet gloved hand of pomposity's destruction, no less.

Last year, on hols, I bought and read a second hand copy of Clive James' 'The Crystal Bucket' - mid 70s TV review columns for the Observer; uncannily, my pal - and fellow Word reader - Uncle Spike did exactly the same thing on his hols this summer. I think we both agree, CJ is a genius. Is anyone re-reading volumes of, say, Piers Morgan's columns these days? I rest my case...

0
Colin H | 16 August 2009 - 7:47pm

Lucy Mangan

I just find her various Guardian columns funnier and funnier.

And there's not enough Charles Shaar Murray in The Word.

0
Lando Cakes | 18 August 2009 - 7:23pm

CSM...

a bloody legend.

0
Patrick Crowther | 18 August 2009 - 7:34pm

Boogie Man

I've just finished CSM's biography of John Lee Hooker. It's superb; weaves all sorts of threads together.

He is the living proof that Frank Zappa's dictum about music journalists is, if not wrong, then not always right.

0
Lando Cakes | 18 August 2009 - 7:46pm

'there's not enough Charles Shaar Murray in The Word'

...although I'd say there were probably enough words in 'Charles Shaar Murray'. Indeed, possibly erring on the one-too-many side...

0
Colin H | 18 August 2009 - 7:32pm

there's not enough CSM

in MacUser any more, there's hee-haw CSM

0
James Blast | 18 August 2009 - 8:23pm

I agree...

with most of the above, especially Marina Hyde and Peter Bradshaw, but one of the best writers around has to be David Thomson who writes about film for the oft-mentioned-herein Guardian. He has an amazing, fluid way with language and has insight that other writers can only dream of, meaning that even if the subject is of no interest, the article always is. He also has exquisite taste.

0
martyk | 19 August 2009 - 10:10pm

David Thomson

Fantastic shout

Although primarily a critic and journalist, he also wrote a great novel called Suspects featuring characters from some great movies from the 30s through the 70s and woven into a dark and compelling tale

Silver Light is good too as is Warren Beatty and Desert Eyes - an extraordinary blend of fact and fiction using a biography of Warren B as its starting point

His A Biographical Dictionary of Film (various editions)is indispensable - and you're right about his taste and writing style

0
Sheev | 19 August 2009 - 10:20pm

and...

at the risk of turning this into a Thomson love-in, last year's 'Have You Seen..?' is the single best guide to films I've ever read. You can just work your way through the thing.

0
martyk | 19 August 2009 - 10:33pm

The Grand Fromage of sports journalism

Hugh McIlvanney surely deserves a mention. I always savour his writing, like a fine malt, even if the subject matter is often of little interest to me (horse racing, for example).

His attention to detail is such that he is famous for 'getting off a train to change a comma'. Giles Coren eat your heart out.

Also from the Thunderer, I enjoy reading Daniel Finkelstein (his
Comment Central
blog is a very handy commentariat roundup), David Aaronovitch and Matthew Parris.

0
DougieJ | 19 August 2009 - 11:33pm

I have to say

that Hugh McIlvanney's prose is little purple-ish for my taste - similarly James Lawton

0
Sheev | 20 August 2009 - 12:17am

A pale lilac

perhaps ;-)

0
DougieJ | 20 August 2009 - 7:35am

A quick word for the weekend FT

John Lloyd's TV column is always interesting, and contrarian- though not for the sake of it (in my opinion); and Peter Aspden is a graceful arts writer.

I find their weekend magazine is superb, and only regret that Lloyd isn't editing it any more as that was an even more extraordinarily concentrated high quality read.

We also used to read Hamish McRae but I don't get the Sindy as much as I did now that Bywater's column is gone.

0
SpaceBoy | 20 August 2009 - 8:33am
SpaceBoy | 21 August 2009 - 11:27am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd