Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

When should you stop wearing jeans? If ever.

Uncle Wheaty's picture

I was walking behind a teenager the other day in Oxford who seemed to take pleasure in wearing a pair of jeans that would never cover his arse and he was clearly proud to show off his underwear.

These were skinny bottom jeans ala The Ramones and would probably have fitted a 10 year old perfectly.

It got me wondering when do you stop wearing jeans? I will admit to some early 1980s horrors such as "stretch jeans" that left nothing to the imagination in the nether regions but it seemed fine at the time.

So jeans are a permanent young persons mode of attire, but when should you stop wearing them, if ever?

I still wear them and have no plans to stop. But then again 36 inch waist, skinny bottoms should have a limited market!

2

52 in August

still on black jeans, okay they're Cotton Traders™ extra gusset capacious style rather than the old FU's "left nothing to the imagination they did" ones, but a chap's got to find any port in a storm

0
James Blast | 23 March 2010 - 9:58pm

53 in August

and purchased my first pair about 18 months ago. I refused to wear them as a teenager or student (as a 'rebellion' against uniforms) and only got this pair after mucho nagging from Mrs. F. I've worn them a few times and they're.... OK-ish.

1
Mark JF | 23 March 2010 - 10:01pm

53 in August

and purchased my first pair about 18 months ago. I refused to wear them as a teenager or student (as a 'rebellion' against uniforms) and only got this pair after mucho nagging from Mrs. F. I've worn them a few times and they're.... well, just not me.

0
Mark JF | 23 March 2010 - 10:02pm

51 soon

Will be 51 next month, and still wearing jeans. Odd, but ones that fit seem to be getting harder and harder to find. Where I live you can be looked at as a snob for "dressing up" in khakis.

0
Curtis from Ohio | 23 March 2010 - 10:19pm

try

Cotton Traders, I don't work for them BTW I just find they cater for a man of my age and 'proportions'

0
James Blast | 23 March 2010 - 11:56pm

Or Lands End (45 and a half and no sign of giving up yet...)

...which also sensibly restrained and properly proportioned jeans of good quality at a reasonable price. My personal denim of choice.

http://www.landsend.co.uk/

0
Trevor_Raggatt | 30 March 2010 - 5:32pm

At 40 I still wear jeans

but find they play increasing havoc with my nether regions when I sit down.

0
Adman | 23 March 2010 - 10:24pm
Uncle Wheaty | 24 March 2010 - 9:08pm

At 54

I would wear jeans if only I could remember where I put them.

1
Axekeith | 23 March 2010 - 10:53pm

Jeans are WORK CLOTHES

they're hard wearing, useful trousers. Obviously pandering to fashion looks sillier the older you get, but why you should stop wearing a particular fabric out of a sense of embarassment is beyond me...

Having said that, I might knock the gingham frocks on the head when I hit 40.

1
Joe Muggs | 23 March 2010 - 10:53pm

You're right there

My Grandad wore baggy jeans into his late '80s (I doubt he wore them as a young person), held up by a combination of braces and string tied round the waist. They were great for gardening, cooking etc - all the things he did regularly. They started as work clothes before becoming fashion items.

0
Janice | 24 March 2010 - 2:09pm

46 tomorrow!

And will be wearing jeans.

They're timeless. Just make sure they fit and you feel comfortable in them.

I don't think I'll stop wearing them, I've never considered it.

0
Beezer | 23 March 2010 - 10:57pm

Happy Birthday.

:-)

0
Adman | 23 March 2010 - 11:32pm

How very kind

Thank you.

0
Beezer | 23 March 2010 - 11:36pm

Happy Birthday too ya!

and many of 'em.

0
Pencilsqueezer | 24 March 2010 - 8:18am

Happy Birthday

Did you get any denim based trouserware as a present?

0
Uncle Wheaty | 24 March 2010 - 9:09pm

Thanks to all for the birthday wishes

No denim-wear, Uncle Wheaty, but amongst the haul a fine pair of M&S lounging-about-in strides which I'm modelling at the moment.

Along with a £15 Amazon voucher, a £20 Fat Face one and Mr Funny and Mr Cool bookmarks. Those last from my daughter who can't seem to decide what I am.

0
Beezer | 24 March 2010 - 9:18pm

If they're comfortable

It's clothes isn't it? Surely you should wear whatever you feel most comfortable in. I hate wearing anything other than jeans (except shorts in the summer) so I'm going to keep wearing them. I guess there is a time when they start to look a bit odd but as long as they're a classic cut and not too scruffy I think they're fine.

0
JohnW | 23 March 2010 - 10:59pm

Just about given up on them

48 here.

I have two pairs, one used solely in the garden these days and a pair that haven't been out for many weeks.I think there is a time in a man's life when certain items of clothing need to be ditched and it's time to move on to something a little more appropriate. I'm definitely at that stage.

0
Sebastian Beach | 23 March 2010 - 11:51pm

my body

rejects flannel, shirt shirts, ties, anything beige, non trainers and knitted anythings

0
James Blast | 23 March 2010 - 11:58pm

Hmm.

43 and still weaing 501's like the sad 80's relic I am.

When should one stop wearing jeans? Probably it's a function of waist and inside-leg measurement.

I have noticed that middle-class chaps of a Certain Age now seem to have adopted brick-red or mustard-yellow sort of canvas jeans as a uniform of choice. With a checked shirt. And a cashmere jumper draped over shoulders.

None of us have yet made this jump, have we? Mr Hepworth..?

0
Lenny Law | 24 March 2010 - 12:22am

I know the look you mean

Not pleasant and the start of a slippery slide to a life of tweed and monocles!

0
Uncle Wheaty | 24 March 2010 - 9:10pm

Holy moly,

kill me if I ever stoop to this - which I've seen btw - 'brick-red or mustard-yellow sort of canvas jeans'
I believe that you should wear what makes you happy, but that's not a good look.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 24 March 2010 - 12:29am

something to consider...

The FPO used to work for house of Fraser (other retailers are available) and she has informed me that once 'jeans' get above size 36" waist they should be considered as 'denim pants'.

0
Bob the dog | 24 March 2010 - 4:23am

Mr High & Mighty

A friend of mine worked in "Mr High & Mighty", a shop which caters for the larger gentleman. His notions of scale were re-set on his first day there when he saw a customer browsing in the shop who had the Daily Record shoved in the back pocket of his jeans. Traditionally to make this work, the paper needs to be folded in half then in half again. Not this chap - just folded the once and it fitted in neatly to the patch pocket on the back of the jeans.

1
el hombre malo | 24 March 2010 - 7:51am

This is a side point...

But having found my footwear of choice: DMs in the winter, Converse in the summer, I can't see myself shifting from that... Which suggests that I will stick with jeans.
However, once my kids reach teenage, and my clothes start to shame them in some unintended way, perhaps I will adapt in order to create minimum embarrassment.

Or I might just plough on regardless.

0
Adman | 24 March 2010 - 7:50am

Still in Jeans.

Apart from the occasional foray into Combats.As a Chap who can't abide a Suit(will only don one under sufferance)can't see that ever changing.Have told the GLW to send me off to the Great Gig in the Sky wearing me trusty Levis'.Remember "Neck ties strangle clear thinking."Chairman Mao.

0
Pencilsqueezer | 24 March 2010 - 8:29am

when should you stop wearing jeans?

I take mine off when I go to bed.
Usually.

1
badartdog | 24 March 2010 - 9:52am

Excellent

That really made me smile at the beginning of another boring day at work.

0
Axekeith | 24 March 2010 - 9:55am

Jeans are fine at any age, but ....

... what style to go for. When I first starting wearing Levis' there were few styles to choose from and you had to wear them for years before they faded. Now the question is straight leg or boot cut, tapered or flared? Surely not the skinny jean? Low Rise or comfort fit? and which style wash?

Personally I think gentleman of a certain age should plumb for a straight leg or boot cut (if you can carry off the latter). A darker colour and go easy on the distressing there fella.

On no account should there be any exposed underpant.

'Suits You!"

0
Steerpike | 24 March 2010 - 10:01am

Clothing choices have a lot to do with confidence and culture...

Whilst I was living in Florence last year I saw a man of around 65 riding a Vespa. This in itself is not extraordinary. What struck me was the way he was dressed. He was wearing those loose fitting trousers with loads of pockets (cargo pants?), very trendy trainers, a tight-fitting designer shirt and an extremely expensive pair of shades. It was immediately apparent to me that he would have seemed ludicrous sporting this get up in England; but in Italy he just looked fashionable and cool.

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 March 2010 - 10:53am

It's the whole look isn't it?

There are jeans and jeans, and waists and waists. Some men of a certain age look ridiculous in jeans if they are pulled over the waist and makes the backside look huge; other men (OACA) look ridiculous in skinny jeans meant for students.

With jeans, shoes present a problem cos shiny ones or ones that are meant for a suit look silly and trainers make the wearer look like an eighties rock fan.

Colour is important too. IMHO there is no place other than working on the garden or visiting the dump, for pale blue denim (however 'now' it is). Dark blue is the one.

The look du jour for the 40+ seems to be The Clarkson - jeans and "sports jacket" - but this presents a shoe dilemma.

0
kb | 24 March 2010 - 11:34am

Ah! The Shoe Dilemma.

I generally 'team' the jean with a caterpillar boot or Doc Martin - of a somewhat matt appearance. However, I recently invested in a pair of long wing tip brogues of the sort that skinheads wore in the seventies. My GLW tells me they are WAAAAAY too shiny to wear with jeans - which is a bit of a blow to be honest.

Perhaps I can start a new trend.

0
Steerpike | 24 March 2010 - 1:23pm

Shoes are an issue

Go barefooot and rediscover your inner hippy!

0
Uncle Wheaty | 24 March 2010 - 9:15pm

By coincidence...

I posed this very question to Mrs P at the weekend while out for my five-yearly visit to a clothing emporium, to whit, should a gentleman aged 45 still be purchasing jeans, or should I now be buying other forms of trouser? Both she and my 15 year-old daughter felt that it would be entirely appropriate to continue to wear jeans, although sticking to a straight leg and darker colour, as Steerpike suggests, would be preferable to a more a la mode cut.

I still find jeans comfortable and am assured that I look ok in them. I am not ready yet for SLACKS, although the day will surely come. Until then, I will continue with the denim.

0
MichaelP | 24 March 2010 - 12:16pm

Luckily my job allows me to maintain just the one suit...

for Weddings, Funerals, and, uh, Court appearances...

Although, for my own funeral I intend to wear jeans.

0
latenitetellyvision | 24 March 2010 - 12:44pm

A casual approach

I'm a jeans wearer most of the time as well - Nobody really cares what you look like while you're writing software - and I think I'll follow your lead and wear them to my funeral as well (unless I live so long that they just don't suit me anymore!). I think I may request a casual dress code for everyone else as well. Funerals are bad enough without wearing uncomfortable clothes and once a year shoes as well.

0
JohnW | 24 March 2010 - 2:22pm

The thing about jeans...

is they can be worn by anyone, regardless of age, gender, status, class or cultural background. A good quality, well-cut pair of jeans that fit properly can look fine on anyone. Having taken a great many fashion risks down the years, I've since learnt what suits me (both in terms of fit and appearance) as well as what's comfortable. If I stop wearing jeans, it certainly won't have anything to do with what somebody else thinks a man of my age should be wearing, because I know that better than anyone, thanks. Furthermore, I would never dream of wearing a pair of those low-waisted, super-skinny affairs that make the wearer look as if he's attending a Max Wall impersonator's convention, anymore than I'd let my partner choose my clothes for me as a matter of routine. I'd hope both would be sensible choices for any adult male.

As for The Clarkson Effect, consider this. Jeremy Clarkson is almost certainly the sort of person who holds (and would vocalise) the sincere belief that for a man to give more than the slightest passing thought to his attire, if not his appearance generally, is indicative of grave moral turpitude. This is clearly borne out by the way he dresses. I'd imagine his idea of a dandy is someone who irons his t-shirts. It's perfectly possible to wear jeans well into middle age without ever looking like Jeremy Clarkson.

1
Joey Jones | 24 March 2010 - 2:28pm

Thank God

The day I fear I'm beginning to look like Jeremy Clarkson is the day I end it all.

I'm only 44, FFS. I intend to continue in denim for the foreseeable future.

1
Five-Centres | 24 March 2010 - 3:13pm

I'm 55 and it's 501s for me …

… and has been for decades. I can't see me ever wearing anything else except for shorts in expectation of a summer worth the name.

They're me. They're what I wear.

I'm a big lad but blessed with a 34 waist. I suppose in the event of my belly ballooning to grotesque proportions I might have to have a rethink.

0
Silas Lang | 24 March 2010 - 3:46pm

Forever in Blue Jeans

Would appear to e the mantra of The Massive.

Enjoy this..

0
Uncle Wheaty | 24 March 2010 - 9:13pm

I usually sing

"the reverend Blue Jeans" I know it's wrong but I like it

0
James Blast | 24 March 2010 - 9:18pm

It depends on the jeans

I'm 45 and still wear jeans. I think "comfort fit" is the key to not making young people gag as you pass by.
I spent the 80's in stone-washed denim atrocities. As with my colossal mullet, I'm not proud of that, but everyone was at it (like Bono, who had a severe case of "Can-you-leave-it-long-at-the-back?).
Then I spent years in denial, buying waist-sizes smaller than I needed, convinced I'd get back to the 28 inches I'd been as a lad. So now I've come to terms with the fact that no-one wants to see my curves, I keep them 'roomy' and a dark shade of blue. The colour is important unless you're in Status Quo and want to offset them with a big pair of white trainers.
If you are in Status Quo; rock on, and the day you start wearing pleat-front chinos is the day it's over for all of us.

0
Mac45 | 24 March 2010 - 11:24pm

On the basis of dressing slightly better than your clients..

I will very occasionally wear a suit, mostly though it's a jacket/ decent shirt/jeans combination, often with loose tie. Suits me well, never even considered the question of too old for jeans before.

I'm 55.

0
Declan | 25 March 2010 - 12:49am

Dressing your age is important.

This has become a big issue for me.
I am 38.
I have always worn jeans and t-shirts.

I no longer feel comfortable wearing a t-shirt and prefer a shirt.
Jeans are fine.
Trainers are not.

I notice men of a certain age who are not dressing their age and they look ridiculous.

0
Blue Sky | 25 March 2010 - 1:12am

The trainers stay

I can see me at some stage (not now, I'm only 51) trading in my jeans for something else but I can't see me stopping wearing trainers. I don't care what they look like, they're comfortable, and that's the number one priority for my feet - actually I do care what they look like but you get the point. The only shoes that I've ever had that I would call comfortable was a nice red pair of Kickers from the early 80's and I don't think I could, or would want to, get away with them anymore.

0
JohnW | 25 March 2010 - 2:00pm

jeans

Sitting here at 51 in me Lees as I write - my wife looking over my shoulder tells me our daughter says 'double denim' will be the cool look this spring/summer. Definitely too old for that one - you just end up looking like Status Quo

0
mick50 | 25 March 2010 - 12:36pm

Yummy Mummies in their 30s/40s look really good in jeans

Not sure their menfolk do though.
Always preferred corduroy myself, because I'm Walter Softie and denim is too stiff and harsh.

0
Richard Lowe | 25 March 2010 - 1:13pm

Been mainly wearing a couple of pairs of cords

for the last year. I see it as a holiday from jeans, a denim gap year if you will.

0
Mr Fade | 26 March 2010 - 12:48pm

My Dad

My dad only started wearing jeans for casual when he reached his seventies and remarked he wished he'd started earlier. He never wore t-shirts to my recollection but did own a pair of trainers.

I'm just turned 59 and I still shamelessly wear jeans. They're essential wear for work, as it gets very dirty in my line of business.

I still wear t-shirts as well and have only just forsaken trainers for baseball boots for when I'm out and about.

I have a good suit, a few white shirts, a selection of ties and a couple of pairs of shoes etc. for formal occasions but I seldom seem to need them.

0
Mike_H | 28 March 2010 - 10:57pm

The Tights Man

A local celebrity in Kristiansand, Norway. This is what an unhealthy interest in German skin-tight jeans from the 80's can lead to. If you don't understand Norwegian start watching from 1:50. A picture is worth a thousand words.


0
Norwegian Blue | 29 March 2010 - 2:55pm

old folks in jeans

The look i hate; is the old man in jeans with the suit jacket; and to top it off; trainers.just looks like the oldest teenger in town.

Older people (over 25)should never,ever,ever ,wear drainpipe jeans.

If i wear jeans i've got to have my truty suede boots on(Clarks-on?),Classic!

0
stevie p | 30 March 2010 - 11:44am

1-2-3-4

Joey Ramone would turn in his grave if he could read that!

0
JohnW | 30 March 2010 - 1:30pm

I'll stop wearing jeans...

...when they prise them from my cold, dead arse.

1
Guitarbug | 30 March 2010 - 6:29pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd