Entertainment For Lively Minds
What would Jesus have done?
It was my daughter's (Junior)school sports day yesterday, and not for the first time in recent weeks, I uttered the words 'What would Jesus have done?'
Some backstory: the school is C of E, nominally so until recently, but the new-ish headteacher works the religious angle big-style, because that way she can bring in more funding and appeal to the middle-class middle Brighton parents who want their kids to go to the 'best' local secondary school which also happens to be a faith school. I may have mentioned in previous blogs that many parents have suddenly started attending church, and have even got their children confirmed to enhance their chances of getting into that secondary school. Pray or Pay, I think it's called. For those who genuinely are of the Christian faith, this must be galling.
After last year's Nativity play, the head leapt onto the stage, and with a Henman-esque punch of the air, shouted 'Ofsted's just told us we're AN OUTSTANDING SCHOOL!' She then drove home. In her car that has personalised number plates.
The MUST-WIN culture hung over the sports day like a cloud full of shit. Some of my work is as a Personal Trainer, and a large swathe of clients are people who associate fitness and health with that school ethos of winning. Simple equation: since there's generally one winner, there's a bunch of losers who're put off exercising for many years if not life. The winners are often in no better a place: the pressure to keep winning is such that there's no joy in the activities, and/or they end up crocked through over-exertion. Joy is the key here. The joy of movement is what's being missed out on; the mind and body become increasingly estranged, and the body simply becomes a heavy sack that has to be manipulated in order to 'win' respect for the person. I suspect the roots of the mind/body split lie not in Descartes' focus on the thinking self, but more on the old-school Christian shame around the body-as-locus-of-desire.
So why's my daughter at this school? Her brother and sister were pupils there in the mid-90s, and it was a ramshackle, all-inclusive place with the Christian element more an ethical framework than a business plan.
I'd also like to add that I'm really not opposed to competitive sport. Again, though, it's the joy of the process, poetry in motion if you will, that makes it all worthwhile, rather than the win-at-all-costs, blame everyone else ethos that increasingly prevails. Watching Mo Farah flow around the track last weekend was a majestic sight; Mark Cavendish sprinting in the Tour De France is an awesome spectacle, too. So I'm not suggesting 'all have won, and all shall have prizes', but I am saying that the next parent who asks their child whether they won, rather than whether they enjoyed the process, should be given a five second start and then have the starting pistol turned on them.
- More from Mensi.
- Login or register to post comments










Agreed
I enjoy sport, but not the win at all costs mentality. Especially in youth football, where working with the ball and enjoyment should be priorities, not charging up and down the pitch with a load of angry Dads screaming at you to 'get stuck in'.
Even at my weekly 5-a-side games, there are always a couple of lads who take it far too seriously and get on everyones tits.
A parent at my daughter's sports day said of her 5 year old son "I want him to win, because it's a tough world out there, and if you can't compete you'll get nowhere."
I think the poor little sod will end up on The Apprentice.
Kids' football
My son's team has just got a new coach, because of the last one's appalling attitude. When the team lost 12-0 to the unbeaten-for-four-years League Champions towards the end of last season he told them they should all be ashamed of themselves. That's to a bunch of 11 & 12 year olds, including his own son. Classy. He's not coaching in our club this coming season.
The new coach's first words to the assembled parents were along the lines of: "I don't care about winning or losing. Obviously winning is better than losing, but losing is part of sport. My priority is for the lads to have fun and develop friendships that will last for life. I also promise you that every boy will get roughly the same pitch time across the whole season no matter what his ability. If you don't like that approach then I'm sure there are plenty of other teams in the city [Liverpool] where you and your son will be made very welcome." A few kids haven't been back since, but I could have hugged him.
Having been at his first two training sessions, I have every reason to believe that he will live up to his words. Here's hoping...
Coaching Kid's football
Seems to be an arena for dad's to relive their alleged former glories. Friends got their kid into an under 7(!) football team as a goalie, who absolutely loved the whole bit of being in a team. They recommended it to mutual friends - who then sent their boy there as a striker. The team consistently played badly and got relegated - not that the team cared. The goalie still loved it for the camaraderie and team spirit . Anyway, after the team got relegated, the old coach moved on. So Striker's dad volunteered to take on coaching and announced that the team needed to pull up its socks and take things more seriously. His first move? To phone up Goalie's parents to tell them that since their son didn't cut the mustard he'd "had to let him go." They still haven't summoned up the bravery to tell the lad he has been sacked and they are no longer friends with the Striker family.
What are we teaching our kids? "if you can't win it's pointless?"
Relegation at U7?
That is truly, truly appalling. The County FA shouldn't be letting U7s play competitive football, let alone sanctioning leagues with promotion and relegation.
What are we teaching our kids? "if you can't win it's pointless?"
Or as Jose Mourinho put it, "In England you teach your kids how to win. In Portugal and Spain they teach their kids how to play."
I Like The Ethos..
..of the big marathons like London - start the ones first who are competitive then start the rest a bit later do do what they want - personal bests, just had a go or turned up dressed as a tortoise cos that's how fast they're going to go.
My serial incompetence at any sport...
... soured me of any enjoyment of it, to the point that I started to actively run away when balls came near me before, at the age of 14, deciding just never to take part. However I have recently taken up jogging, in the hope of shifting some belly (lost a stone in the past year, so it works fine). Not sure if hauling my wheezing carcass through a park causes me any joy as such, but my less wobbly belly gives me a warm inner glow, so I guess I concur.
No children as of yet, but rampaging atheist lapsed catholic bastards like me will find pay or pray difficult...
Excellent post
which brought back horrible memories of games lessons at my own comp in a small town not far from where you are now.
I hated every minute of it and it put me of taking part in sport for life. Even now, I absolutely detest the whole ethos of team sports, specially since my Dad was constantly bullying me to take part as it would (of course) make a "man" of me. (Reader: it failed).
I don't just hate the win-at-all-costs mentality, but even more than that, the attitude that this is the most appropriate approach for boys in particular, and the appalling macho bullshit that flows from that set of attitudes.
I can't post Youtube links from work, but I'm hoping someone will post "Sport (The Odd Boy)" by the Bonzo's. I was that boy!
I hated
school sports days. I just wasn't that great at athletics and some of the other stuff they made us do. And I wasn't really built for it. However, I did discover that I was an OK cricketer and went off and joined a club instead.
I loved it. It helped that it was a good club and that the junior (and later senior) teams I played in were actually pretty good and we won more often than we lost. But the key part about it all, especially in the junior games , was the parents and coaches wanting us to just enjoy it. There were people there I enjoyed great friendships with, and still do in some cases. I had to stop in my late twenties because of a shoulder injury (I was a bowler), otherwise I might still be playing.
Team sports and competition are a preparation for life, but the OP has it bang on. What's the point of winning when there's no joy to be had in it? Without a sense of fun there's just no point.
Bonzo's..
bitte schoen..
http://youtu.be/L2Jn1UvS8GM
What would Jesus have done?
Based on past form, he would have just hung around.
(Sorry, apologies etc etc)
You want to be careful. He
You want to be careful. He may get a little cross at that!
Watch It, You Two!
I hear Jesus has finally returned.
He pitched last night up at a Travelodge, put some nails on the desk and asked, "Can you put me up for the night?"
Nature vs Nurture
We are all competitive, only to differing degrees.
Parents are a nightmare for kids. I know, I am one. You want them to do well at everything they do so that they learn to value what they do in as many different ways as possible: joy being an especially good way of valuing your achievements.
But you constantly have to check yourself that you're not warping them with your own bullshit or the bullshit of others that you co-opt from elsewhere to impose on your kids: it can make you look and sound like a fraud. My honest opinion is that telling your child they need to be the best and to win at all costs is not instilling in them the tools they need to compete in life. It is telling them that there is only one way to succeed in life which is a simplistic and linear narrative that reduces life to the accumulation of trinkets, baubles and applause.
The mantra of winning and being the best is only a target in sport or in life: it tells you far less about who you are as a person than the process of trying to do your best. It's lazy and reductionist parenting in my opinion, applying a very narrow and adult-oriented objective that is more about creating an appearance for the outside world than about preparing your child for the outside world. Life and sport is not all about crossing the finishing line first. God help us if it was.
That said, I firmly believe that kids need to know where you, as a parent, set limits. But as a parent it is your duty to use those limits to free your kids, not enclose them. Sport is great for this. Telling your kids they have to be the best is setting a limit that is limiting to them, to your relationship with them and to their relationship with other people. I've seen the kids in team games whose parents expect them to be the best on the pitch rather than do their best for the team. The root value of competition is to improve yourself to do better for yourself and by others, not to be better than everyone else.
I realise this possibly sounds like some kind of horrible list of motivation techniques but it's not, honestly. I'm just writing in short-hand something that is both highly personal with multiple strands of off the cuff parenting involved. It's mostly intuitive, based on trial and error, flying by the seat of your pants parenting that occasionally uncovers a rich vein that helps bring long periods of joy. Sport is good for this.
I quite like the notion of competition in schools
After all, it's a competitive world. And it ain't gonny stop being so.
Realise this is probably a minority view on here. But heyho.
Competition is good
but so is participating AND learning to lose. You can't win unless you learn these other two skills.
Absolutely True
We used to be known as a country who lost with some grace. But I think the primary message should be it's even better to win (with good manners of course) as well.
In what way
is this not being taught at the moment?
I find this a tricky one
I'm the parent of a 6 year old kid who enjoys sport, and plays a wide range of them at the local YMCA - baseball, basketball and soccer. The entire league is organized by the Y, so all the teams, coaches and parents have signed up for the same ethos.
It's nice - all the kids get game time, and there are no "winners" or "losers". They learn to play the right way and a lot of good values.
And yet.... and yet.... Chris keeps score. He knows exactly who won and didn't.
There are kids out there who are not ever going to enjoy or be good at sport. You can see it now. There is alack of joie de jeu about them that has nothing to do with the coaching (which is generally excellent)
When I was growing up, I reveled in sport. I took delight in playing, in and of itself. I took great delight in beating the opposition; I didn't like losing, but that made sure I tried harder the next time so it didn't happen again. I played principally team sports, rather than individual athletics, and I can say a lot of what I use well on a day to day basis at work I honed on the playing field.
Win at all costs, for young kids, is wrong. But we should never lose sight of the fact that kids ARE competitive, and that winning or losing is part of life's cycle. If you want to exercise without competition, there's a place for that. But I do believe that sport is, and should be, competitive.
*dismounts soapbox and tries to exercise mind not muscle*
It's not the winning that matters...
it's knowing how to win, and lose, with good grace, I reckon. Once the joy of participating goes out of sport for the winners and the losers, so it disappears for the spectator, too, and we wind up with idiotic tribes who measure their lives by the performance of their team. I was watching a documentary about Bobby Charlton the other week, and came to the conclusion that my passion for top-level football began to wane when he, and players like him, began to disappear from the game.
What would Jesus have done, Mensi? Not that I hold any candle for organised (or disorganised) religion, but he probably would have turned the other cheek, rather than turning a gun on anyone. Know what you mean, though!
One word answer
wept
Do the best you can
That's one of the only really useful bits of advice we can give our kids when it comes to sport. There's a fine line between encouraging them to try hard (which will usually mean trying to win), which I think is good and positive [assuming the child doesn't actively hate the sport], and hectoring them to WIN, DAMMIT, KILL THE LITTLE BASTARD. If/when my daughter starts doing any sport with a competitive element, I'd want her (and me) to both rejoice in her triumphs AND make it clear that her defeats don't matter in the great scheme of things. Clearly, I'll never make a tennis parent!
Seconded
"Try your best" is our mantra. Twang Jr age 7 is keen to try lots of things and our constant message is you might not be the best at things but as long as you've tried your best, that's all we ask. Some of the footy Dads at school horrify me though. Some of the other kids are already diving, pulling shirts and having a little poke with the elbow, and I have never seen the Dad's look anything other than chuffed about it. Being a good sport and playing for the team is another value I try to instill. Happily the coach is pretty good and doesn't miss much.
As an U12 (soon to be U13) Manager
I would like to say it's bloody complex trying to get everything right. My personal ethos is that I do it to provide some kids with an opportunity to play an organised team game, learn the benefits of playing as a team and taking responsibility and having fun. And in no particular order.
It gets difficult because some players are more committed - they train every week and organise (or their parents do) their lives around the fact that they play football on a Sunday morning. Others will miss training, not be available for every 3rd match and yet still expect to be treated the same as everyone else.
One other thing I think is important. That they learn to win and lose properly. They shake hands, they don't gloat or sulk whatever the provocation (and, truth be told, there is very little). But then we're not in the top couple of divisions - playing in Division 5 has its benefits. At the top, I suspect it's a little different.
Coaching
Leedsboy, we've discussed kids' footy on here before and I know you're coming from pretty much the same place as me on this.
I agree with you about the importance of attending training. But the coach/manager needs to make training fun (as I'm sure you do). Starting ten minutes late because the coach is standing around talking to one or two of the parents about the great drinking session they had on Saturday night; making the kids run their b*ll*cks off for 40 minutes while you stand around talking; and then playing a 10 minute free-for-all game in which one or two of the adults show off their skills to the kids is not the kind of thing that's going to enthuse any 12 year old; nor, for that matter, improve his skills.
And, yes, the commitment thing is difficult. I appreciate that every kids' football manager gives up loads of time to help kids enjoy their football. I am hugely grateful for that. I also expect my son to go to every single training session and match for which he is available. "I'm a bit tired tonight, dad" does not cut it as an excuse for missing training. However, he's 12. He has many, many other things in his life that are as important to him as his football: tennis, cricket, seeing his non-football-playing mates and, most importantly for my lad, membership of a very active Scout group. Sometimes those things have to come before football.
Tonight is a case in point: he's doing Part 2 of his British Canoe Union 1-Star award with Scouts. As a result he's missing football training. Our new coach totally understands this and has no problem with it. Out of respect for him we gave him as much notice as we could. We'd have done - we did - the same thing for the old coach, but he would have told me that Joe lacked commitment... That's crazy. He's a kid playing football for fun, not a pro going through rigorous pre-season training.
Anyway, as I say, I know our views are broadly similar on this. I'm sure you're a great manager; I hope you'd think I was the sort of parent you'd want around your team!
I agree more than broadly
Football is not the be all and end all of an U12 boy. So they have different interests that will clash at times - thats good. It was more those that choose when to and when not attend and yet still moan that they aren't getting a full game when they do come. Actually, its normally the parents who have arranged something social on a Saturday night and won't make it the following morning who then moan the following week when their son is sub. It makes it a little more frustrating than I would like.
And I hope he does well on his canoe test - canoeing is my fondest memory of scouts. Great fun.
Canoeing
"And I hope he does well on his canoe test"
He did brilliantly. Top marks in the group... ;)
Nah, not really. He passed the test after two fantastic evenings paddling around in Queen's Dock with his mates. I was jealous: it looked ace.
Jesus would have been
doing the catering with his rip-off fish sandwiches again
This is a toughie for me.
It was my little girl's first sports day yesterday, and I felt the school got the balance just about right. Kids got "medal" stickers for 1st, 2nd and 3rd place, and there were six kids in each race. So half the kids in the school got a "medal". And the emphasis was so obviously on having fun, teamwork, cheering each other on and so on that the half who were stickerless by three o'clock didn't seem to mind at all.
I think it's nice to learn to win graciously, and for it to be obvious that some people do win sometimes, and for it to be made clear that not everyone gets to win.
But it's also important to fail. That's how we learn almost anything worth learning: we fail at it, then get better. It's such a big part of how we learn to take responsibility for ourselves.
I suppose it's all about the atmosphere in which this happens. Win or lose, if the atmosphere is supportive and kind and discourages triumphalism and gloating, you'll be onto something good.
School sports in general
are still a subject where you're allowed to ignore the no-hopers - and get praised for it.
Get a good performance in inter-school / county sports - well done the PE staff.
Say "I'm not bothering to teach young Ellen maths any more, he's crap at it, I'm going to concentrate on the good ones" doesn't go down so well.
Yeah
I wasn't much cop at football, but I still played with cubs and at school. And I never received any football coaching. Not once. It was presumably for the kids who were good at it.
The key is to try
I wouldnt want either of my kids to do anything without trying their best. I firmly believe in most walks of life you only get out of something what you put into it. On that basis I fail to see how any of us would want our children to go into something in a half hearted way. If they dont win in a competition there is nothing at all wrong with trying harder next time. However ,and this is where I agree with the essence of what Mensi is saying ,there should be absolutely no shame in failure. Equally there should be no triumphalism in winning. Magnanimity is an attractive trait that very few possess. Encouragement to do better is not a crime. My daughter had her end of term report yesterday which was largely excellent. What I really appreciated though was that every subject gave her tips on areas where she should concentrate even more to improve her performance. Don't recall seeing that on my school reports and I thought it was a good way of getting the kids to try even harder.
Try your best
I'm not sure I would want my kids trying their best at everything all the time. Obviously, I'd like them to have interests which they can enjoy and do well at (my daughter enjoys reading and art), but would I want to deny them the life-affirming pleasure of a good skive?
I did quite well at school, but I also used to enjoy gazing out of the window and scribbling band logos in my exercise book.
Life isn't all about striving and competition. A lot of pleasure is to be found in masterly inactivity, sitting back and watching the wheels go round.
My attitude is probably a reaction to my father, who was very much of the 'always give your all' school of thought.
Let's hope America never elects
a "Hockey Mom".
worse than that..
a "soccer mom"
Worse than that...
...a "mama grizzly".
elephant in the room
Personalised number plates? Oh please.
Is there anything more pointless
than personalised number plates?
Yes
I mentioned before that I saw a bright red big pseudo military vehicle on the M1, number plate BIG RED with a big fat bloke with red hair at the wheel.
When I see these
personalised number plates, only one thought passes through my mind. "What a knob!"
There's a great, cheap way of getting personalised plates.
Change your name by deedpoll each time you get a new car.
You may refer to me as HK05FSG Law from now on.
He would probably have said...
"So the last in the sack race shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen."
Or something equally cryptic.
Funny guy, JC.
Hilarious.
I work in a church school. It isn't sitting well with my secular humanism, but it pays the mortgage.
To quote Captain Jean Luc Picard, "Engage."
(Huge 'I'm not a parent' caveat up front, so feel free to disregard.)
Maybe the thing about sport, and all the rest of it, is engagement then trust. Get them into a position where they actually do stuff (educational, recreational, sport) then trust them to find their own particular channel. Having seen my peers bring up kids, i know that what i'd be worried about would be horizons, engagement, confidence and enthusiasm rather than specific subjects, sports or hobbies. I just imagine that if the kid has faith in him/herself and sees the planet as a big interesting thing to experience - rather than a big scary thing to hide from - then that attitude will mesh with something external at some point. (Yeah, i know, i'm not a parent.)
Where's Dave Amitri when you need him?
One of his lads is a fine footy player and Dave's previously made some good points about the coaching ethos.
For me, I play a few sports. I'm good at some and shit at others. I've never been that bothered about winning or losing. I do, however, get very aerated if I don't play to the standards I set myself.
I'm here Len
and this subject raises it's head here almost as much as RT and HJH but this is a little closer to my heart. You're right I've stated my opinion before, teach the kids to play and enjoy first. The good ones will come to the top and if they're really good they will need to learn to win at some point. Sunday morning park football is a vipers nest of failed adults and shellshocked children who wonder what happened to the game they used to love, it breaks my heart and I will be glad when next season is over as it will be my last as a volunteer coach, it is a thankless task. Children develop differently and at different ages, a good biggun will beat a good littlun at a young age but the good biggun will turn into Emile Heskey (apologies Emile) not Andres Iniesta or Xavi Hernandez, coaches in this country just don't see it. I love the Mourinho quote up there a bit.
I always loved school sports day as a child and adult, I miss them now they're gone, a brilliant piece of writing from the heart again Mensi.
'Failed adults and shellshocked children'
Bang on the money, Dave! Interesting that the vast bulk of the replies here are from men talking about boys; there's a whole lot to be discussed about girls. But it's school run (walk, actually) time, so, um, l8rs etc.
Good point Mensi
For the record, my daughter is an excellent horse rider. She's 15 and has been riding with an adult group for a couple of years now. Her only competition is with herself: to jump a little higher each week; to be more and more confident on the difficult horses; to dust herself down and get back on when she falls off. Her teachers are excellent, showing a good mix of empathy and persuasion. She absolutely loves it and it's completely non-competitive. I'd never thought about the correlation before, but I have now...
My daughter is seven
and does gymnastics at the weekend. She enjoys it, and they reach proficiency badges so she can see how well she's doing. Plus there's a little bit of informal competition between the kids to see how they're all doing but it's not a hothouse.
The whole "try your best" thing is something my parents instilled in me, not "you must achieve". I was lucky, as I was pretty strong academically so the achieve bit just kind of happened for me. I had friends who weren't so lucky and got immense amounts of pressure put on them; one springs to mind in particular, who went through utter hell during his A Levels.
But I'm trying to have a relaxed attitude with my daughter, not hung up on how she does, just that she gives whatever she chooses to do her best go and enjoys it in the process. Like your daughter's experience it seems to be very beneficial.
My FPO is a lifesaver for this.
She has a much more relaxed attitude towards achievement, and really reins in my competitive side. We concentrate on "try your best" too, and I really think our girls won't feel like we need them to be crazy overachievers.
She says, and I think she's right, that we're both pretty bright - FPO in particular - so the chances are that if we're supportive and helpful to our girls, they'll do fine at school. We're not the types to let them get away with undone homework or shirked practice sessions, but I also think we're never going to be horrendously pushy.
We see the pushy parents already. Boblet #1 is five, and already our neighbour - whose little boy is in her class at school - is asking "how was Boblet's report? What level is she in her reading?" and taking the little lad to extra classes after school. Gah.
Pushy parents
The worst example of pushy parenting I've ever seen was on TV show about young tennis players. There was a young girl of about 7 or 8 who was forced to hit tennis balls for two hours every night after school.
It wasn't a case of the girl liking tennis and being encouraged to practice by her parents. It was a conscious decision on the part of the parents to create a professional tennis player. The father made the chilling remark "When my wife got pregnant with our fourth child, we decided with this one to really make a go of it with the tennis."
Chilling...
...is right. Do people not realise that living out your own dreams vicariously through your kids is a BAD thing?
oh i think it is quite a good thing
i have just bought my 8 year old twins John and Paul matching suits. They have lovely bowl haircuts and they've both taken up musical instruments. I have had to scold Paul for playing his violin bass right handed, but HE WILL LEARN.
Reading
the most important skill to have gained by the end of primary school. It's worth a litle extra effort early on. Join that library, "read" the picture books with no words (develops cognative skills - and the page turning dexterity), read to your child, read in front of your child ("see - daddy loves reading too"), buy books (second hand is fine so lets have no "they are so expensive" excuses) help and support in any way you can.
Anything to avoid them being the kid at secondary school with a reading age 2 or 3 years behind their actual age. Yeah, they may catch up eventually, but all that time spent on remedial reading is time not spent on the rest of the curriculum.
That's my little rant over.
Perhaps
Bob's neighbours are already making the poor kid fearful. all the extra classes are likely to do is make it even more of an issue when, like you say, it may be enough just to read to him and be seen reading by him. That way reading is seen as a normal and fun thing to do, instead of a chore which is then pounced upon when he doesn't do it to expectations.
My little'un loved first me, then her, reading Dr Seuss like Green Eggs and Ham and The Cat In The Hat.
He's five.
His reading is fine. He gets read to.
The extra stuff is just his nervy mum and dad being fixated on him being top. At five. The "extras" Slick mentions come as standard as far as we're concerned - as an English teacher I'm only too aware of what happens to kids with low literacy - but there's a difference between making sure your kids have the best start in life and pushing them until they're resentful and exhausted.
Seems
we are of one accord there then.
It does
look that way !
Interesting point.
Competitive Parent / Win At All Costs Syndrome is generally discussed with respect to male offspring and sporting achievement.
We tend to forget that CPWAACS can also be academic. And seems to be particularly prevalent amongst parents of girls, who are happier to apply themselves more dilligently to academic study. It, as a syndrome, is also seen a lot in Oriental and Indian parents who demand high academic standards of their children - the Tiger Parents.
"blessed are the losers"
for they shall always outnumber the winners
..allowing them a numerical superiority which guarantees victory should they choose to crush the winners...
they cut that bit out, y'know
Rugby
My son plays youth rugby at one of the professional London clubs, he'll be in the U17s in the autumn, and I always think they have the win-enjoyment balance just about right.
It's a competitive, physical sport and they play in a league, but they have always been taught that you don't win at all costs - you win by training hard and playing your best.
They celebrate their successes and accept their defeats with good grace. The training is fun and engaging with emphasis on skills rather than brute force.
There is a premium on good behaviour on and off the pitch and in five years of watching I have only ever seen half a dozen punches thrown. Mind you, one of those was by my son the day after his girlfriend gave him the elbow, and he was promptly subbed by the coach.
And parents are left with no illusions by the coaches that touchline warriors will not be tolerated. I have never witnessed the kind of horror stories that I read about youth football.
After every game the teams do a handshake line up, and they often have a meal together as well, which is a good way of diffusing tension after a bruising encounter.
Whether all this changes as they get older remains to be seen, but I hope not. Most of the team having been playing together for a number of years now and they are pretty self-regulating now.
And football could learn an awful lot about play acting and respect for the ref from rugby.
The football can learn from rugby view
depends on which aspects.
In 5 years of boys football, I have never seen a punch thrown. Nor any eyes gouged.
There is definitely more backchat to the ref in football but my role, as a manager, is to set an example so I can stop them as soon as I see or hear it. And if it doesn't stop, they come off. My team are pretty respectful to referees, I think, as a consequence of this. But its all part of that win at any cost mentality thing that some managers have I think - someone needs to be responsible and the ref is the easiest target.
Rugby and respect for the ref.
I've had some howling arguments with people about this.
Rugby is a game which is, fundamentally, about cheating. How much can you get away with? Are you offside? Was that pass forward? Did that lad release? Did he roll away? What can you do when the ref is unsighted?
I will wager that there is not a scrum, maul or ruck at the upper levels of rugby in which, unseen, there is something illegal being done. This is not a criticism. This is just an observation on the way the game is played. Hence, when you get caught out, you have to shrug your shoulders and say "Fair enough.."
Unless you're Matt Dawson, of course.
Flexes shoulder
I can address the rugby refereeing thing. I've refereed at a lot of levels, to just short of semi-pro. A pretty decent standard, all the way down to Ghetto rugby.
Eye gouging is so rare as to be a statistical anomaly. I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I have seen a rugby player try to take a dive. Or claim a throw in when it clearly came off him. And I don't remember the last time I saw anyone spitting at the opposition. We can cast aspersions on both codes based on what we see at the top level.
At the lower levels? The ethos of the game seems very different. The mutual respect - to the opposition, as well as to the referee. Yes, there is 'cheating' - try to find the offside line I'm calling today, for example - but everyone knows which side of the line to stay. There is usually a degree of sympathy and concern for the fellow man if there's an injury. I'm afraid to say that (as a sweeping generalization) these are things that seem to be absent from soccer. This is based on highly scientific research based on watching the game and talking to my round ball counterparts.
The game has cleaned up - a lot. When I grew up playing in the mid, late 80s, there could be an undercurrent of physical confrontation. Things could - and would - get a bit tasty. I'll be honest - I never had a problem with that.
Soccer is a great game, and I watch a lot of it, and there are some great people involved in it. I'd be happy for any of you-all to coach my boy. But I really hope he grows up playing rugby
Hockey
I'm a national league hockey umpire. Our game is far closer in attitude to rugby than football.
As an example of this, I've been umpiring for over 20 years now and in all that time I've only shown three red cards myself and seen my colleague (there are two umpires controlling a game of hockey) give four. They're so rare that if there's a red card in the national league over a weekend, everyone 'on the circuit' knows about it within minutes.
Like Si I love football and watch as much as I can. I'm happy that my son plays football; but I wish he'd give hockey a go...
Finite and infinite games
is a favourite book of mine:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_and_Infinite_Games
You might enjoy it, Mensi
I have read it twice Mensi,
and I still don't know what your point is.
Something about the atmosphere at Church schools? Church schools in relation to sports?
The relative importance of participation and success in sports more generally? What take Jesus might have on some/all of the above?
I suppose
I'm musing about the use of Christianity by some parents to 'win' coveted secondary school places for their kids, and the use of it by some headteachers to 'win' status (and funding) for themselves and their schools. The message of winning is further inculcated at the sports day. Hardly what we're told Jesus was all about.
Paul 456: 45-67
And, Lo, it was said that it is righteous that those of the classes of middle with elbows of sharpness shall claim to knoweth of The Lord so that the fruit of their loins shall have access to places of learning. And those who heard did sayeth unto one another "Ooh that's great. Love the skirt, Ellie. Is it Boden?"