What was the last album you played in sequence and in its entirety?

The invention of the random button probably more than other change in technology or format has fractured the way we listen to music and brought about pick n' mix mentality and a system of simple self editing so unique it would have been unthinkable before CD players were available.

It's become almost mandatory to have an out of context experience with albums and album tracks. This loss of locked in listening is ironic at a time when artists are playing complete albums in the correct running order live, while we can compose our own selective setlists anywhere. So my question, is apart from new or 'new to you' albums and compilations - what was the last favourite or familiar album you listened to as it was made to be played? Mine were....

Ziggy Stardust - to see if it was as good as I remembered ( it wasn't)

Beggars banquet - 'Prodigal Son' popped up while my player was on random, and inspired this posting.

Exile on Main Street - It's just not the same out sequence

I nearly always

play albums in their entirety and in sequence, that's what they were made for. Despite having iTunes and an mp3 player, the only time I use the 'random' function is when I don't have time for a full album.

Anyway, to answer your question, my last 3 were:
Victory for the Comic Muse - The Divine Comedy (though I streamed that from last.fm, does that still count?)
The Holy Bible - Manic Street Preachers
Tigermilk - Belle and Sebastian

feelingsinister | 24 January 2008 - 12:21pm

"In sequence" is one thing,

while "in its entirety" is another.

Surely the sequencing of the songs on an album is part of the artistic endeavour? Shouldn't the songs have a flow and a structure across the piece, even when it isn't a "concept" album?

Granted there were space limitations to the vinyl format that probably affected the sequencing of some albums, but for the most part, as has been alluded to here in other threads, the track sequence plays a part in the whole listening experience.

I never listen to vinyl in anything other than its original sequence; apart from anything else it's just too much faff to chop and change. Getting off the sofa more than once every 20 minutes or so isn't natural anyway. So, once side 2 starts rotating, it gets played to the end, every time.

As far as CDs go, that's where we get to the important distinction between sequence and entirety: with all the remastered albums I have on CD, I still want to hear the songs in their original sequence, but I rarely if ever listen to the "bonus" material more than once or twice when I first purchase it; it's not usually good enough material to bother with.

I'm not sure if it's the result of decades of vinyl based listening having conditioned me, but I rarely want to hear a full CD's worth of stuff from the same artist anyway, 45 minutes or so seems to be about right!

Vulpes Vulpes | 24 January 2008 - 12:32pm

Thats' the thing...

Regardless of format CD or Vinyl, shouldn't the album be played as sequenced? Certainly albums made in the pre 'CD/extras/fill 'em up to 70+ minutes' era.

But the random/shuffle button is a shortcut to making the overly familiar fresh again, and becomes an easy convenience to abuse.

Dave C | 24 January 2008 - 12:50pm

40 minutes or so

I'm with you on the length of album.

A CD like the re-released Sweetheart Of The Rodeo allows for a slightly different sort of experience - substituting the Gram Parsons vocal versions of songs like Christian Life for the McGuinn versions. Then you listen to the songs as sequenced on the original album. Its neither better nor worse, but it is a different perspective.
Off the top of my head I can't think of any other CD's you could do that with, from the point of view that Parsons brought about the fundamental change in the Byrds musical style.

CarlP | 24 January 2008 - 1:55pm

New albums I do

I listen to new or new to me albums as intended..

Fountains of Wayne
The Bongolian
Dennishopperschoppers (6 times on the bounce in fact)

But I'm a terror for 'randomizing' albums I already know.

Dave C | 24 January 2008 - 12:35pm

I am Kloot

by I am Kloot. see post elsewhere!

Jim Thomas | 24 January 2008 - 12:37pm

Astral Weeks, Born to Run and Blood on The Tracks

They're just wrongity-wrong any other way.

Archie Valparaiso | 24 January 2008 - 12:38pm

Totally agree.

Along with anything else I hammered between 1967 (the dawn of pocket money) and 1985 (ie anything I bought pre-digital).

Don't you find your brain plays the first chords of the next track in your mind's ears before it actually arrives anyway?

Heck, I even know how long the real gaps are!

It's a medical fact; changing the sequence is physically and pyschologically discombobulating.

Vulpes Vulpes | 24 January 2008 - 1:38pm

In reverse order:

Radiohead - In Rainbows
The Smiths - The Queen Is Dead
Sigur Ros - ( )

I flit between using shuffle and playing full albums. One of the very best things about the shuffle function, as mentioned by Dave C in the original entry, is that it throws tracks up that you haven't heard in ages and you think "I really should check that album out again".

But Dave, you're just SO wrong about Ziggy Stardust!!

David Ellcock | 24 January 2008 - 1:17pm

I nearly always...

play albums from start to finish. I have found myself getting more obsessional about records as I get older. When Kate Bush's 'Aerial' came out, I literally did not play anything else for 3 months. It's great getting that familiar with an album... when you feel you know every note, every nuance in the music.

'Rock Bottom' by Robert Wyatt has been getting some serious airplay round mine recently... not the sort of album you want to dip in and out of.

Patrick Crowther | 24 January 2008 - 1:19pm

I think Dave C has it about

I think Dave C has it about right; new to my ears have always to be all the way thru', once or twice, immediately. Thrice if stunning.
The whole then digital transfer can take place, but, and here is the rub, only of the tracks that are worth the returned visit, purely for the random enjoyment aspect, WHEN that is the format required. Thus I listen to cds and LPs as nature intended, albeit often agreeing that the former are often certainly too long, either for the time available or for my patience with 'em. Random i-poddery is another delight entirely and I never use the i-pod in any other way, apart from the "have you heard this scenario". Plus, says the smug git, i-pods aren't big enough to hold all the content, to include the fillers and the clunkers, which, another strand reminds, are so necessary to the CD/LP whole. Last 3 all thru? "Between darkness and dawn": Mary Gaulthier (a thrice listened, at that), "Basquiat Strings" : eponymous and "Mark O'Connors Hot Swing" : eponymous trio.

Retropath2 | 24 January 2008 - 1:23pm

Shuffle albums not songs

I always listen to albums in order if I can. I mostly have iTunes set to Shuffle Albums rather than songs so that I get the full album but the selection of which albums to play is random.

My last three:
Vienna Teng - Waking Hour
Air - Talkie Walkie
Rilo Kiley - Talk Offs & Landings

matt_cochr | 24 January 2008 - 1:25pm

Best of Both Worlds

Exactly.

Album shuffle is your friend.

When I first got my iPod I shuffled songs, like just about everyone else, but that always felt too 'bitty'. Album shuffling just feels right, especially on a long car/train journey.

Anyway, the last three:

Wild Wood - Paul Weller
Teenage Depression - Eddie and the Hot Rods
Willy and the Poor Boys - Creedence Clearwater Revival

Paul Waring | 24 January 2008 - 2:35pm

Tired of the shuffle

I'm a relative newcomer to the ipod world but have already started to lose interest in the shuffle. As other posters have said, listening to some tracks out of context is brilliant for reminding you of how tremendous something is but I find that the novelty of it has already worn off and I'm back to listening to albums all the way through and in sequence.

Last albums in order:

Raconteurs - Broken boy Soldiers
Divine Comedy - Victory for the Comic Muse (no, really)
Richard Hawley - Lady's Bridge

Con_Coleman | 24 January 2008 - 2:55pm

Shuffling one band's work

I can't remember how I have set it up on my iPod, but I really like having all the tracks I have by a band on one 'album' or 'playlist'. Shuffling on this can take me through from a track on album 1 to album 3 etc and it revitalises them all somehow.

I have only done this with groups who haven't had many albums and are fairly similar in style and all top quality. So for me it works magnificently with The Strokes, Kings of Leon, Interpol, The Smiths.

kb | 24 January 2008 - 2:59pm

One artist on random

Yes, I like to just play the seven Steely Dan albums on random for about 4 hours over a few days until I've heard every track. And it's the way I usually listen to The Rolling Stones.

LOUDspeaker | 29 March 2008 - 11:08am

Backfiring irony

I am a serial shuffler and happily randomize all by a selected artist IE John Martyn, so the irony wasn't lost on me - while attending a show on the 'Solid Air' tour - that I was one of the first to huff, puff and raise an eybrow when 'Solid Air' was played out of sequence. A live requirement due to JM's unusual tunings.

Dave C | 24 January 2008 - 4:00pm

Unfortunately

There are very few albums that you can play anymore as "nature intended". Usually they are too long with too much filler which is why Radiohead In Rainbows is so good. I have lived with it for 2 weeks now and it still gives me a shiver. 10 tracks in 43 mins. Its along time since I bought into such a complete album.

However to your main point
Led Zep IV
AC/DC Black in Black
Rolling Stones Sticky Fingers
Joni Mitchell Blue
Marvin Gaye Whats Going On.

I can't hear anyone of these apart from the way they were intended.

And try Abbey Road on Shuffle. Cripes.

Springer | 24 January 2008 - 5:03pm

Depends on the Journey

I normally play albums in sequence but since I usually only play them in the car it depends on the length of the journey (and the length of the album obviously) if I get to hear it in its entirety. Last one I played was Nebraska - half way through Used Cars I'd reached my destination.

Stephen G | 24 January 2008 - 5:40pm

All the time at the moment

Because I've got a new car where the iPod sounds crap and CDs sound great.

Lucas Hare | 24 January 2008 - 6:57pm

Always in order...

Only ever in order, I only ever use random on my Zen for the Word Randomiser thread. I'm more of an album than a song man.

kidpresentable | 25 January 2008 - 1:31am

I have yet to...

...succumb to the charms of the portable mp3 player. Currently my listening is split between a PC and the Hi-fi in my bedroom. While in front of the computer I am usually working on something and have music playing in the background. I generally stick i-tunes on shuffle and see what it throws at me.

On my Hi-fi, I play albums, although sometimes not all the way through. I make a point of setting aside some time each day when I can give my full attention to music.

The last album I listened to in its entirety was the new Black Mountain disc - In The Future. I don't know how you would even begin to make sense of something so sprawling, other than by listening to it as a complete entity.

backwards7 | 25 January 2008 - 7:12am

It's all in the ear of the beholder......

I was musing to this strand as I drove into work today, listening, for the first time, all the way thru' as nature intended, to "Title and Idols", by Beth Hirsch. This I had recently downloaded from the excellent E music site, that sells me 40 tracks a month for $10 (old rate: more for new subscribers)Somewhat bland and anodyne, inoffensive at best, singer-songwritership with more beeps and peeps than Madge/Ray of Light to make it "modern", so I had time to realise that what I assumed was the "right" order was actually not. The problem with E music is that I seem unable to then "burn" in the right order: onto i-tunes and it comes out in reverse, a dead giveaway if there is a hidden track, and not a little unsettling. If I use my roxio burner, they seem to all appear a little shuffled. But do I care and have I noticed, pace the hidden track nonsense? Well, no, 'cos is it not only (over) familiarity that insists in the "correct" order? Yes, yes I agree about Abbey Road, and probably many "concept albums", but it, side 2 at least, and most of them are rubbish (oooooooo!) anyway. Seldom have I felt shortchanged by the order, even if more frequently by the content.
P.S. What exactly is a Ring Modulator? Is there a related reason why Dikmik was never seen sitting down?

Retropath2 | 25 January 2008 - 9:00am

I think they sell them in...

Ann Summers shops.

Patrick Crowther | 25 January 2008 - 7:27pm

I've had a couple of drinks...

...and I accidentally read that as Andy Summers shops. I thought he'd gone into business selling telecasters..Oh well...My vote is for Diamond Dogs. Any albums with reprises HAS to be listened to in order.

stuart robin | 27 January 2008 - 1:27am

Is Ann Summers still with us?

If so, she could go into partnership with Andy... telecasters and ring modulators a-go-go.

Patrick Crowther | 27 January 2008 - 10:22pm

Perhaps...

...they're the same person like Walter/Wendy Carlos..erm...I think I've gone too far. Sorry Andy and I really liked your book.

stuart robin | 28 January 2008 - 12:21am

What exactly is a Ring Modulator?

It modulates one sound with a different sound - the output is the sum and the difference between the two sounds, which often has an overtone a bit like a bell (which puts the "ring" into "ring modulator). Wikipedia has audio examples and a long explanation.

Often one of these sounds is a constant synthesized wave - that's how you can sound like a Dalek.

matt_cochr | 3 February 2008 - 2:15am

Easily influenced

On the way into work today, I listened to Portishead by Portishead. This was inspired by the pop on trial episode I saw on BBC4 last night.

Paul Chandler | 26 January 2008 - 12:05am

I'm dreadfully anal about this kind of thing...

...I tend to always play albums right the way through. I'm a bit of a Luddite in spite of my age! Now I'm playing Japan's 'Quiet Life' right through (first time hearing it, like what I'm hearing so far), before that it was David Bowie's 'Stage' remaster and yesterday, The Groundhogs' 'Split'.

Bizarrely, though, I was in a music shop recently and they were playing 'Dark Side Of The Moon' out of sequence, as if someone had played it on shuffle. An album like that to be played out of sequence is something like a cardinal sin!

JJ | 26 January 2008 - 5:24pm

Where's the rest of it?

I played Revolver recently - and it's all over so soon.
I've become conditioned to mentally prep' for 70ish minutes listening time when a CD goes on, so playing a 40 minute album felt like having the table cleared while you're still eating your main course.

Dave C | 29 January 2008 - 4:25pm

Short Beatle Songs

I'm always taken aback by how short the songs are! As soon as they start they end. I'm just so used to 5 - 8 minute Gothic Cathedrals of ROCK that a 2 minute song completely shocks me.

LOUDspeaker | 29 March 2008 - 11:12am

Arrange and Process Basic Channel tracks...

... by Scion. Going through a minimalistic-ambient-techno phase at the moment.

rokketeer | 29 January 2008 - 6:57pm

The albums I played in their entirity yesterday are:

Lambchop - Is A Woman
Curtis Mayfield - Best Of
Anthony & The Johnsons - I Am A Bird Now
Grandaddy - Sumday
Flaming Lips - Yoshimi Battles The Pink Robots
Art Brut - It's A Bit Complicated

nick | 30 January 2008 - 5:11am

Hate the Shuffle function

I hate the shuffle function....it always brings up songs that I am not in the mood for. It also destroys the medley in Abbey Road quite nicely...

Latest albums played all the way through:
The National - Alligator
Van Morrison - Veedon Fleece
Grandaddy - Just like the Fambly Cat
Dennis Wilson - Pacific Ocean Blue

CHARLIE GORDON | 30 January 2008 - 12:11pm

Not got an Mp3 player so...

Generally listen to CDs, mainly in the car and generally in the order they were recorded. As I can only justify going to one of the Sparks spring residency gigs where they will play every album in its entirety, I am currently entertaining myself by playing each album in order - so recently listened to Angst in My Pants. Also recently listened to in sequence: Green Day's American Idiot, the Icicle Works Small Price of a Bicycle and the new live album from the Ukrainians.

Janice | 30 January 2008 - 2:48pm

Ignore me

I posted something and I've now removed it.

LOUDspeaker | 30 March 2008 - 12:56pm