Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

What was the first CD you ripped?

LOUDspeaker's picture

February 2005. My Creative Zen Touch arrived. I installed the MediaSource software that came with it. The first album to be ripped had to be a good one that could withstand a lot of plays as it was going to be quite lonely until I could rip more than the initial ten or so albums. I chose Black Cherry by Goldfrapp. I ripped it as an MP3 at 192kbps CBR as recommended by Classic Rock magazine (Brain Salad Surgery article also inside which opened my eyes and made me like Emerson Lake and Palmer (ie. no one understands it either so stop trying to "get it" and just accept it for what it is)).

A few years later I started ripping at 320kbps VBR as the file sizes were only fractionally bigger by about a thousand megabits per song. Personally I can't hear the difference between the two bit rates.

0

The Jayhawks

'Rainy Day Music' May 2003
I remember it well. I had just got my first iMac [G4 anglepoise style] and this cd was my most recent purchase and was on top of the pile so went in first. Great album, great computer, great times spent ripping my whole collection! [got 20 or so albums in before I realised that if I had my internet connection switched on, iTunes would find the album info for me - D'oh!]

0
ChaosandMorphine | 31 March 2009 - 12:50pm

Capt Fantastic And The Brown Dirt Cowboy

It was onto my 1st generation 5gb iPod so I guess that dates it to early 2002.

Since it's release Capt Fantastic has been my 'test record' that has been the first play on every new bit of kit I buy.

0
stimpy | 31 March 2009 - 1:00pm

I've no idea.

I simply can't remember. I had iTunes installed on my iBook for several months before I acquired my first iPod, so I had a significant library already set up.

0
JQW | 31 March 2009 - 1:11pm

The Best Northern Soul All-Nighter... Ever

I had a big pile of soul CDs and a party coming up so was just going to compile a big playlist and hook the computer up to the stereo.

Let me see, that was the shared house with the two teachers so it must have been the summer of 2002, because that was when I got the computer in lieu of repayment of a 70 quid loan. 70 quid for a computer wasn't bad!

Was another 4 years until I got an iPod.

0
SimonL | 31 March 2009 - 1:32pm

Be Here Now

in 1999. I was limited to somebody else's choices in an electronics lab. The irony that the album could be squished down to a ninth of it's actual size was not lost on me at all.

0
TedLoaf | 31 March 2009 - 1:43pm

I can't remember

Although I'll never forget the day I bought my first spoon it was with my first proper pay check I wandered down......

0
Chris G | 31 March 2009 - 1:55pm

cont. p 94...

0
Reno Dakota | 31 March 2009 - 2:50pm

It's not unusual

I had my CD's in alphabetical order by artist - so it was ADULT. Anxiety Always

Oddly enough, I get slightly irked by those who have their collection in any High Fidelity-ish way. It's not big and it's not clever - and it suggests you have nothing better to do with your time.

I'll stick to my A, B, C's folks (not ABC...)

0
Reno Dakota | 31 March 2009 - 2:59pm

I gave up on the ABCs a couple of years ago...

..it's too much effort when you come home with the new Air or Ryan Adams album.

0
kidpresentable | 1 April 2009 - 1:22pm

?

A few years later I started ripping at 320kbps VBR as the file sizes were only fractionally bigger by about a thousand megabits per song. Personally I can't hear the difference between the two bit rates.

If you can't tell any difference between 192 and 320kps, why persist with the larger bitrate (you'll get a lot more tracks on your player, obviously)?

The first CD I ripped was The Stone Roses' Beggin' You single which wouldn't play properly in my standalone CD player - the extracted audio worked fine, though.

0
Paolo Meccano | 31 March 2009 - 3:14pm

Why persist?

Paranoia is the answer. I have a fear, a dread, an existential anguish, that one day I will suddenly become an audiophile. Unlikely I know, but why take the risk (not that I'd be satisfied anymore with MP3 and would have to go lossless anyway)?

0
LOUDspeaker | 31 March 2009 - 3:21pm

Aaah...

...I understand you: for similar reasons I'm currently ripping my CDs to WAVs, archiving those on DVD and then converting those files to (192kps VBR) MP3 so I can put them on my player. If, in the future, I get a player which can support FLAC, or is large enough to play the uncompressed WAVs, I'll simply dig the appropriate DVD out and make some new files.

0
Paolo Meccano | 1 April 2009 - 10:14am

errr....

Why not just keep the original CDs (1411kbps WAV) as your archive rather than ripping then reburning?

(puzzled)

0
stimpy | 1 April 2009 - 10:21am

Well...

DVDs are six times the size of CDs (4.2GB as opposed to 700MB) so it's just more convenient to go to a stack of DVDs rather than having to search through thousands of CDs for the particular track I want.

0
Paolo Meccano | 1 April 2009 - 11:37am

Like an earlier poster I had i-tunes up 'n' ready long before

I had an i-pod: I knew one was coming at Christmas, so I started ripping all my CDs in handfuls from the shelf. I don't recall the first, but I recall that for days random gave me little but Jethro Tull, who I don't especially like, but one of their greatest hits was inthe first few ripped. Strangely, don't think I've had 'em crop up again for yonks.

0
Retropath2 | 31 March 2009 - 6:32pm

Delays' Faded Seaside Glamour

So it was. I must've just bought it, May 2004ish.

I was ripping everything to .ogg at the time - a tremendous faux pas, it turned out. I bought an iPod a year ago and have had to re-rip everything; up to New Order now, in my alphabetical marathon.

0
Matthew Horton | 1 April 2009 - 1:27pm

What made you think .ogg was a good idea at the time?

And what format are you now using?

0
LOUDspeaker | 2 April 2009 - 10:12am

I took advice from one of those...

... audiophiles, who said it'd sound better than mp3. Oh - and at the time, .ogg was the only thing that would allow gapless playback (of mixed/segued albums), which was dear to my heart.

I'm mp3 now, now that it works properly. It's just easier; it being a Hoover-like standard.

0
Matthew Horton | 2 April 2009 - 1:56pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd