Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Up Arrows

Spartacus Mills's picture

Anyone else find them unnecessary? They can be a bit cliquey and nasty, I feel.

18

Nasty??

I'm really trying, but I just can't see any way in which the ability to give an up arrow can be construed as "nasty". How? It was certainly possible when there were down arrows. I'm not exactly sure about the "cliquey" charge either. How can you tell?

5
Rosbif | 3 October 2010 - 1:41pm

How?

Occasionally one of the established, popular members will get into a verbal joust with a lesser mortal, and will imediately be bestowed with numerous up arrows.

It reminds me of the playground, where cowards stand behind the school bully.

8
Spartacus Mills | 3 October 2010 - 1:45pm

Now it's about bullying?

It may not be a fair question to ask you (you may not want to pick on anyone, which is a perfectly honorable position to take), but an example might be useful. I don't fully understand what the practice is that you are objecting to.

3
Rosbif | 3 October 2010 - 1:49pm

Franzen

The Jonathan Franzen thread is what prompted this thread by the way but it is by no means the only example. Just what benefit is there to the up arrow?

5
Spartacus Mills | 3 October 2010 - 1:49pm

Simultaneous postings

OK, I've looked at that thread again. There was a bit of needle developing, for sure. Was anyone being "bullied"? Not to my eyes. Giving an up arrow because you think someone's made a good point isn't nasty. Perhaps a number of people all thought someone had made a good point, and "upped" accordingly. I honestly don't see where bullying and nastiness come into it.

2
Rosbif | 3 October 2010 - 1:55pm

Maybe it's just me

But I think that up arrows are often used in the same way as down arrows. ie - "I don't like Member A, but can't down arrow him anymore, so I'll just up arrow his opponent."

That thread looked for all the world like one man and his 'gang' against another man.

5
Spartacus Mills | 3 October 2010 - 2:00pm

That's a shame

I try extremely hard to avoid that. There were two people on that thread who I pulled up for their approach - it's not like I'm taking sides.

Regarding the arrows, I think they'd certainly lead to cliquey behaviour if they weren't anonymous - people's natural inclination would be check to see precisely who had "upped" them, and once that kind of information is available it can lead to all sorts of issues. Why does X vote for Y but never for me? And so on. That's where cliques develop.

As for "popular" conributors getting more up arrows, I guess that's only natural. I know there are posters I "up" regularly, and it's because I'm consistently entertained by their contributions. If others feel the same way, that will reflect itself in a degree of visible popularity.

Having said that, the small amount of research I've done really shows only one certain thing: the overwhelming majority of "ups" are contributed by readers who tend to comment very infrequently - i.e. it's a way of getting involved for those who don't want to dive in at the deep end.

11
Fraser Lewry | 3 October 2010 - 2:47pm

I used to lurk...

...but have now graduated to thread killing.

I think Fraser has a point. I certainly found that by "upping", I felt I was participating and, whilst often in awe of the erudition, wit and wisdom on this board, I am now happier to throw my 2p's worth into the mix.

There are some other websites that I frequent where the use of "uppies' could do wonders for removing the repetitive posting of violent agreement. To me they are part of what makes this the most civilised and amongst the best on-line communities that I know of.

Have an "up" Massive!

8
Gavin Adam | 3 October 2010 - 4:29pm

You'd probably have to ask

the poster involved whether they felt they were being bullied. As for a preponderance of ups, it's unlikely anyone would either own up to piling into a mob or even be conscious they were doing so, if that is what was occurring.

4
MyAmericanMate | 3 October 2010 - 2:03pm

I like them

I agree with Rosbif - things here seemed grumpier when there were down arrows too.

I'm sure Fraser will be able to confirm how they are actually used, but they are useful if someone has made a point that I agree with : if I have nothing to add other than "I agree", then I click on the up arrow. They're also useful when someone has posted an entertaining link.

I think Fraser had said before that they were used quite a bit by people who don't post much, which seems to be encouraging wider interaction.

I'm interested to know why you see them as nasty.

5
el hombre malo | 3 October 2010 - 1:50pm

Nasty

Not all usage is nasty of course. I've used 'em myself to give praise to a funny post. Some usage can be nasty, however, and I don't think the positives outweigh the negatives.

Maybe it would be better if they weren't anonymous? ie - You hover over the up arrow total and it reveals a list. I've seen that done with polls on other sites.

5
Spartacus Mills | 3 October 2010 - 1:53pm

Hmmm

What would that prove? I've never given an up arrow on the basis that nobody could see I'd done so (except a couple of times when - a bit sad, this - I've upped a posting I've made, when some glitch in the system has allowed this).

3
Rosbif | 3 October 2010 - 1:59pm

Haha

I admire your chutzpah! As I've said, maybe it's just me seeing things that aren't there. Still, I can't be alone in this as someone has up arrowed me.

It's like rai-ee-ain...

4
Spartacus Mills | 3 October 2010 - 2:04pm
stimpy | 3 October 2010 - 2:06pm

I wouldn't mind that

But as they started without being publicly visible, the change might be awkward to implement. Would everyone want all their previous up-arrows visible ?

I've read the Franzen thread - I decided not to get involved because one of the main attributes of this place is that we generally all get along pretty well, and threads with bickering don't interest me. I don't read the arrows as there as cliqueish or bulling - it could just be that people agree with one or other of the cases put. (I'm not saying you are wrong in how you see it, that's just how I see it)

1
el hombre malo | 3 October 2010 - 2:07pm

Clique

Surely revealing the names of people giving an up arrow will encourage the view that there are clique's on this board? Perhaps there are people here who slavishly give an up to everything by certain posters, but who really needs to know? If it's funny, or I'm in agreement with something I'll give it an up, doesn't matter who it's by.

3
Andy Mackenzie | 3 October 2010 - 2:56pm

To me, they're a way of saying

"I haven't got anything to add, but that was a good post." without cluttering the thread up by actually saying it. It means no more or less than that. No hidden agendas, no favouritism, no bullying.

17
stimpy | 3 October 2010 - 2:03pm

The alternative...

...would be endless posts of "+1", or "me too", or "good point".

I struggle to see how the arrows could be anything to get aerated about either way. Sometimes I get them, sometimes I don't. Sometimes I'll post something that results in the internetual equivalent of a whistling wind and tumbleweed. If I let any of that get to me in any sense - positive or negative - I think that would be nature's way of telling me to get out more.

I'm glad there aren't down arrows. But the ups are fine - maybe a lot of the same people get them because they always write really well and make good points. I'm thinking of people like Bisto here - I up nearly everything the man writes. And on the entertaining side, Underpants and Backwards make me laugh with almost every post. I'm not about to embark on affirmative action upping of other posters just to even the balance. I just up it when I like it.

3
Bob | 3 October 2010 - 2:10pm

I was about to up arrow that

It honestly never occurred to me that they were about anything other than showing agreement - I would have up arrowed Stimpy because what he said perfectly reflects my view. In fact I will anyway. It saves me having to type and in no way am I ganging up on Lucifer Sam though I don't agree with him on this occasion, which is fine.

2
Twangothan | 3 October 2010 - 3:29pm

I have never started a thread

To be honest I feel a bit intimidated as the standard of writing on this site is superb.
However, I do comment on threads and using the up arrows allows me to feel like I'm an active part of this great community.
I may be invisible but I bet I'm one of the most frequent visitors to this site.

5
Mrxsg | 4 October 2010 - 9:34am

Exactly how I feel

was going to post something along these lines yesterday, but was in a drunken state, so decided against it.

0
heshofcheese | 4 October 2010 - 6:10pm

Totally necessary

I always thought there were points awarded. Points meaning prizes, the lucky posters accumulating the most points would get something like a free subscription or Fraser would come to your house and cook you dinner.

You got to, as Tom Waits reminds us, think in terms of that patio furniture.

2
MyAmericanMate | 3 October 2010 - 2:09pm

A useful barometer

Surely the up arrows are a perfect example of online democracy at work? Whether it's simply giving a nod of approval for a witty or wise post, or more seriously, showing disapproval by proxy if someone is acting like a total arse, I feel they do serve some sort of useful purpose.

2
mojoworking | 3 October 2010 - 2:45pm

Which way the wind blows

"Online democracy"? Really?

2
MyAmericanMate | 3 October 2010 - 2:55pm

Yes...

...I think that's true. Perhaps you'd care to expand on why you disagree?

2
mojoworking | 3 October 2010 - 2:59pm

Happy to

I mean firstly there's a slight suspicion in the integrity of what I guess, for the purposes of this conversation, we'd have to call "offline democracy". You know, I grew up in the Ford years (Ford as in post-Nixon) so I see conspiracies everywhere.

Be that as it may, I do not think that anonymity engenders honesty or honour. The fact that many of the 'popular posters' have met could lead to mutual backslapping for the sake of it. So no, I do not think that every arrow is simply a nod of approval.

I'm not sure I get disapproval by proxy. Are you saying no up arrows means the poster is acting, as you say, like a total arse?

3
MyAmericanMate | 3 October 2010 - 3:11pm

Mutual backslapping

I'm sure that's true, but I don't think it's necessarily sinister - it's a reflection of the fact that people who get on in the real world are likely to feel a degree of kinship when they meet online.

But as I mentioned earlier, it does seem that the majority of "ups" come from a different group altogether - those who don't generally comment, and presumably don't get together in the real world either. Of all the Word meet-ups I've been to, I've only met two "lurkers".

1
Fraser Lewry | 3 October 2010 - 3:23pm

I did not intend

to imply anything sinister in mutual backslappage. I'm sure it's got most of us where we are today. The term "lurker", however, that just sounds creepy.

1
MyAmericanMate | 3 October 2010 - 3:32pm

It's a standard term

It doesn't mean anything creepy - it means someone who watches a message board without joining in the discussion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lurker

But as we are on the topic, here is my favourite single by the punk band that Howard Wall fronted - The Lurkers.

(for avoidance of doubt, I like this song - it is not aimed at anyone)

0
el hombre malo | 3 October 2010 - 4:11pm

Every time...

... I receive an up arrow on this website a mysterious hooded archer attacks me with a longbow.

12
backwards7 | 3 October 2010 - 2:49pm
el hombre malo | 3 October 2010 - 3:28pm

Every time...

...I receive an up arrow, a bloke in the stalls at the Glasgow Empire pipes up, "Well, stop bloody doing it then!"

8
Archie Valparaiso | 3 October 2010 - 3:36pm

"aw naw, there's two of them!"

6
el hombre malo | 3 October 2010 - 4:11pm

I just gave all the posts an "up"

are we all happy now ?

4
latenitetellyvision | 3 October 2010 - 3:53pm

I couldn't agree more

Alan Merrill was my favourite.

1
Abergavenny Thursday | 3 October 2010 - 4:07pm

Just out of interest

it's be interesting to see the posts that have generated the most up arrows ever. :-)

0
stimpy | 3 October 2010 - 4:25pm

At this point

I would like to point out I hold the record for the most downs. No one is going to take that away from me.

2
Leedsboy | 3 October 2010 - 4:50pm

What did you say?

"Richard Thompson is a child murderer" or something?

0
Bob | 3 October 2010 - 4:54pm

I asked for it

It's true. Quite literally. During the Arrow Debate years I specifically asked for a load of down arrows to see how low it went before it broke. I recall -49 (but I might be dreaming). It would have been more but Fraser turned the down arrows off. If's and but's......

0
Leedsboy | 3 October 2010 - 5:03pm

Captain Underpants

and his fuckwits has got to be a contender, surely?

1
Tom | 3 October 2010 - 11:41pm

Here's you answer

Mr Wells' heartfelt joy knocks my weary misanthropy into a cocked hat, as it always should and always will. A complete vindication of the up arrow, by the way.

0
Captain Underpants | 4 October 2010 - 3:56pm

I never 'Up'

always 'Karma Error'

1
James Blast | 3 October 2010 - 5:13pm

Which makes me wonder what you must have done

in a previous life to get so much faulty karma.

0
stimpy | 3 October 2010 - 5:16pm

Perspective from a recent arrival

1. I was impressed that there were no 'down' arrows - if you want to disagree, then you have to apply some brain cells to coming up with a response if you wish.

2. With the 'up' being above the name, I tend to click in response to what I've just read, rather than who wrote it.

3. My assumption was that the idea was to recognise erudition or wit or originality etc rather than to reward someone for sharing my impeccable taste.

4. As a newcomer, I have (rather pathetically) been chuffed by getting 'ups' and it has certainly encouraged me to contribute more.

5. It's t'internet. It's not important enough to get fired up over.

But I still don't like Richard Thompson, so there ;)

12
Helena Handcart | 3 October 2010 - 5:21pm

I just got you

into double figures

0
Mousey | 3 October 2010 - 11:28pm

Scandal

Does Mr Handcart know about this?!!!

1
Tom | 3 October 2010 - 11:34pm

The

fiver's in the post ;)

0
Helena Handcart | 3 October 2010 - 11:40pm

Post? How quaint

all the cool people accept PayPal these days

0
mojoworking | 4 October 2010 - 1:05pm

Ah but...

I haven't been here long enough to attain the dizzy heights of Massive Cool.

I'm still just shivering in the wings, but if it helps, I could send a pal round with a fiver for you too.

0
Helena Handcart | 4 October 2010 - 5:22pm

Me too

I arrived around the same time as you and like Jona Lewie, I'm so uncool you'll always find me in the kitchen at parties.

0
mojoworking | 4 October 2010 - 11:33pm

Perspective from a second divisioner...

... As someone who posts and often rereads the next day and equally often thinks "I am the worst writer of all time. My grammer is rubbish, my spelling is appalling, my argument construction is non existent, I have killed this thread stone dead and where the hell do you start with Richard Blooming Thompson anyway?" I find the occasional up arrow a cheery sight. There are individuals here who are a genuine pleasure to read and others (like me), who really appreciate the encouragement when it comes.

4
ganglesprocket | 3 October 2010 - 6:12pm

That's pretty much how I feel

when I read the Captain, Bisto or Backwards7.

1
stimpy | 3 October 2010 - 6:25pm

.up

an deserves That ?backwards read can You

1
Helena Handcart | 3 October 2010 - 6:45pm

The Massive hath spoken

It seems up arrows are quite popular. I'll bow to the majority.

16
Spartacus Mills | 3 October 2010 - 6:15pm

I often seem to get one single up arrow.

I like to imagine I have a huge fan who is a gorgeous, millionaire, princess in her mid thirties who is plucking up the courage to ask for my hand and take me away from all this. *sigh*

2
Mr Fade | 3 October 2010 - 8:11pm

No

Its me and another middle aged bloke but we normally alternate.

4
Leedsboy | 3 October 2010 - 10:24pm

hello

*waves*

1
badartdog | 3 October 2010 - 10:30pm

Goodness, this could be awkward

I didn't know there were so many of us

0
el hombre malo | 3 October 2010 - 10:36pm

Me too

I've managed to convince myself it's Kelly Brook.

0
Beezer | 3 October 2010 - 10:34pm

More likely her

fat, incontinent Australian cousin Belly Krook.

Thank God the down arrows have gone...

1
Molesworth | 4 October 2010 - 7:42am

well, that made me chuckle

have an up!

0
el hombre malo | 4 October 2010 - 10:07am

The up arrow

for me is the chance to thank someone for making me smile or making a point that perhaps changes my view or perspective on something. The receiving of an up arrow for some of the rubbish I write is highly rewarding and as a slightly sad, miserable bugger can make a big difference to my day. I've been ignored, disagreed with, questioned, praised and on the odd occasion where I've got it right reached double digits in up arrows I can't even begin to tell you how happy that makes me. I work on the principle if I throw enough shit some is bound to stick and might strike a chord. If any forum can operate a simple system of acknowledgement then one of this level of intelligence, candour, humour, understanding and politeness should be able to. I had never even considered the use of an arrow as a method of ganging up, even when I got a gentle shoeing over the moon landings the up arrows were in agreement of what was said trying to convince me not a dig at me, or at least that's how I saw it.

7
Dave Amitri | 3 October 2010 - 8:48pm

A sideways arrow

Can we not have a sideways arrow for me to register my complete disinterest in anything anybody may have said

1
Larry Bee | 4 October 2010 - 12:06am

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Only joking!

1
ChaosandMorphine | 4 October 2010 - 6:50am

I may be wrong

But I think this thread may hold the record for the biggest total of up arrows.
I can't decide what this means.

0
drakeygirl | 4 October 2010 - 8:38am

It may mean that...

..the Massive has an - all too - predictable sense of humour!

1
Gavin Adam | 4 October 2010 - 9:28am

What we need

... apart from a Great Big Melting Pot, big enough, big enough etc, is to tackle what them on QI might call The Elephant In The Room: the patently phallic and, frankly, warlike arrow device.
I'm thinkin instead of those toy ones that in place of the usual poison-tipped arrowhead have a suction cup on the end. Puttin rubber on the end of one's pointy thing is bound to make the consequences much easier to bear, I've, er, come to learn..

0
Donald McTroosers | 4 October 2010 - 10:42am

I like 'em

Personally, I don't get out of bed for less than 5 Up arrows

3
Joe R | 4 October 2010 - 10:48am

Personally,

I don't get into bed for anything less than...

2
Gauntlet | 4 October 2010 - 4:19pm

Can I be first

to give you one?

2
Captain Underpants | 4 October 2010 - 4:25pm

Oh Captain,

my Captain...

0
Gauntlet | 4 October 2010 - 5:34pm

Good heavens girl

Surely you've been upped before?

0
Captain Underpants | 4 October 2010 - 6:07pm

A demure, well-bred young lady like myself

would never discuss the number of ups she's had.

0
Gauntlet | 4 October 2010 - 6:30pm

Girl-on-girl...

upping from me.

3
JoLean | 4 October 2010 - 6:43pm

I'm always

up for that.

2
Adman | 4 October 2010 - 7:06pm

The more, the merrier...

1
Gauntlet | 4 October 2010 - 7:10pm

Gauntlet and JoLean

2 girls, 1 up

3
Joe R | 4 October 2010 - 7:56pm

JOSEPH RIVERS!

Wash your mouth out!

Wait...

NOT THAT CUP!

3
Bob | 4 October 2010 - 9:16pm

Are they...

Up curious?

1
Doug B | 6 October 2010 - 1:22pm

I have been a user

of this blog arena for a little over a month and I definitely got off on the wrong foot by proposing that Steely Dan and Madness either mystified me or maybe weren't that great in certain areas.
For my efforts I received no up arrows.
I have shied away from abusing such sacred Word cows as the lack of ups had me weeping into my Cheerios.
I will stay on safer ground until I infiltrate a Massive meet up or go to blog school and study under the ever popular Captain or his ilk.

1
jimmyshoes01 | 4 October 2010 - 11:35am
el hombre malo | 4 October 2010 - 11:52am

Can we replace the up arrows

with a jaunty graphic of an up-raised thumb? Much more matey.

3
ceepee | 4 October 2010 - 2:53pm

Great post

Have a 'Macca'

0
Spartacus Mills | 4 October 2010 - 2:56pm

Ta.

Never had two before.

0
ceepee | 4 October 2010 - 3:06pm

Have three!

Encouragement is good ;-)

0
ganglesprocket | 4 October 2010 - 3:25pm

Pants!

I'd like to see pants instead of what you guys call 'arras' and I see as 'Bad Karma Beckoning'

0
James Blast | 4 October 2010 - 7:31pm

Ever since

this thread started, I've had this bouncing round my head. I was caught humming it in the supermarket yesterday.

So I thought I'd share

3
Helena Handcart | 6 October 2010 - 1:40pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd