Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

unconditional love

niscum's picture

Does this really exist?

One hears a lot about it but I don't see many examples of it and at what point does it cease or is that an oxymoron?

I think it must be rather like assigning rights to eg children, the mentally infirm and furry animals - you do it whilst they are in that state but if things change then you review it.

What's your take?

0

Love at first sight

I'm certain that it happens all the time.

0
Alan Dente | 22 December 2011 - 6:19pm

It was unconditional for me.

She had other plans

3
Ozmium | 22 December 2011 - 6:29pm

When I first held my kids, I felt unconditional love for them

Surely there's no parent who'd disagree with that?

10
stimpy | 22 December 2011 - 6:55pm

Indeed not.

My girls could literally do anything: nothing could stop me loving every cell of them until the day I die.

But I think parental love is the only unconditional kind.

1
Bob | 22 December 2011 - 8:34pm

Agreed

.

0
daddyclark | 22 December 2011 - 8:41pm

Agreed also

Don't most parents have unconditional love for their children? Bit surprised its existence is being questioned.

0
Stephen G | 22 December 2011 - 9:59pm

Sadly

I don't think every parent does...

0
man.of.soup | 23 December 2011 - 1:13pm

Agreed once again

You never realise until you've had a child.

0
wezz | 23 December 2011 - 1:23pm

I think you can

have moments of it. But it's transient like happiness.

1
Ahh_Bisto | 22 December 2011 - 8:17pm

As Alan alludes to..

it's important they love you back.

Otherwise it's unconditional surrender.

0
TreyRoque | 22 December 2011 - 8:21pm

good point

.

0
niscum | 23 December 2011 - 12:33am

I unconditionally love ...

My children, my wife, my immediate family and, now I've started thinking about it, my friends as well. By this I mean that they need do nothing whatsoever for me to love them, in whatever form that word takes.

If love is, in fact, conditional, then it's not really love at all, is it?

1
matthew | 22 December 2011 - 9:06pm

The flipside of that is...

...could any of those people do anything to make you STOP loving them? I love my wife, but there are definitely things she could do that would make me stop loving her, and vice versa. We've talked about it. We're devoted to each other, but there are betrayals and hurts that would be irreparable.

1
Bob | 22 December 2011 - 9:39pm

True

I've said to my wife that there's nothing that could stop me loving my children (liking them is occasionally up for discussion), but then equally, given that nothing could stop me loving them, it's arguably a less... what's the word? Pure, maybe? Not right, but let's go with that for the moment. It's a less pure sort of love than that I have for my wife, by dint of the very fact that I *could* stop loving her yet still do.

Ultimately, you can't qualitiatively compare different kinds of love, but those differences do count for something.

I haven't expressed myself terribly clearly there (plus ça change), but I hope you can see what I'm trying to get at.

1
Fraser M | 23 December 2011 - 3:01pm

Of course

But, as my mum used to say (and she knew a thing or two), not liking someone is very different to not loving them. I can concieve of circumstances in which I don't like one of those people, but stop loving them? I can't see it.

0
matthew | 22 December 2011 - 9:51pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd