Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Turning rebellion into money? Limited edition Converse/ Clash trainers: Discuss

PaddyH's picture

THIS just in on a press release from Sony about the commercial cluster f@ck that is the 30th anniversary of London Calling.
'Converse have collaborated with the Clash to produce a new range of limited edition shoes set to hit stores in January. More details to follow.'
Reminds me of the Linda McCartney steak knife of nearly 20 years ago, but at least that was made up.

1

Good luck to them...

I would suggest they expand their operations into...

toasters
flippers
oven gloves
dusters
attaché cases for the rebellious diplomat

1
Patrick Crowther | 2 December 2009 - 10:24am

what does

the little blue arrow do in the bottom left corner

3
Shells | 2 December 2009 - 10:47am

I don't understand

a t-shirt is good a pair of shoes is bad. Also Clash fans are partly to blame their reverential uncritical worship towards Joe and the lads initiated the process that Sony et al have just picked up on. A large amount of the Clash tat will be bought by ageing "yeah we was always darn the 100 club back in the day, punks not dead..." types.
That or you can just think of them as pop art and not worry too much.

2
Chris G | 2 December 2009 - 11:02am

We shall see

If it sells they'll do more. If it doesn't they won't. It's in the hands of the fans.

0
David Hepworth | 2 December 2009 - 10:50am

shurely

shurely it's on the feet of the fans.

They'll at least vote with said body parts.

1
LuxExterior | 2 December 2009 - 11:27am

Joy division oven gloves

As always, HMHB got their comments in first

0
paulwright | 2 December 2009 - 10:57am
Formbyman | 2 December 2009 - 11:52am

I think it would be great if somebody

actually manufactured Fuck Buttons fuck buttons.

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 2 December 2009 - 12:21pm

I've made a private

and completely arbitrary decision to never listen to F*ckbutton's music on the basis of their rotten and tedious name.

0
Chris G | 2 December 2009 - 12:26pm

But would you ever

stop yourself from using fuck buttons (whatever they might be) for the same reason?

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 2 December 2009 - 12:32pm

On the other hand, maybe

"fuck buttons" is an instruction rather than a thing. I just hope, however, that said instruction refers to squidgy, mountable shirt fasteners rather than a squidgy mountable pet rabbit of the same name.

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 2 December 2009 - 12:35pm

Indeed

still a rotten name.

0
Chris G | 2 December 2009 - 12:39pm

Could I not tempt you

with some Vanilla Fudge vanilla fudge?

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 2 December 2009 - 12:41pm

or would you sooner

roger Roger Roger?

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 2 December 2009 - 12:43pm

Fuck Buttons

....make a sound that I literally imagine the world will sound like when it dies...

0
Oscar Patterson | 2 December 2009 - 1:27pm

are they any thing

like "Peter, Paul & Mary" then? Not sure from your post whether you consider this a good thing . I think I have spent far too long considering the FB's than they deserve.

0
Chris G | 2 December 2009 - 1:35pm

I think I'm going to make you

some "Fuck 'Fuck Buttons' fuck buttons" buttons, Chris.

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 2 December 2009 - 1:38pm

with frank from Blue velvet on them

You F*cking f*ck buttons , f*cking f*ckers you f*ck buttons f*ckers etc and fade

0
Chris G | 2 December 2009 - 1:49pm

Baby wants to

fuck buttons?

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 2 December 2009 - 1:52pm

that's one messed up

pantomime dirty dancing blue velvet mash up!

1
Chris G | 2 December 2009 - 1:55pm

Well, you say 'private'...

.
Isn't the 'fuck' button shortcut Ctrl, Alt, ^,( ?

0
skirky | 2 December 2009 - 1:36pm

Sadly I couldn't find a link

to the 'Kiss Kasket' (TM) so this will have to do ...

Surely there must be one in the Word office?

http://www.fanfire.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Store.woa/wa/product?sourceCod...

Anyway, re the original post, The Clash were always 30% about the clothes, and 30% about the pose. No?

0
Steven C | 2 December 2009 - 12:40pm

Love The Clash

but never 'got' London Calling. Think it's an embarrassment. And I already have a pair of Converse. Dunno why I posted really.

0
chabsy | 2 December 2009 - 12:42pm

What a shame.

Their intellectually rigorous poli'icul stance (not at all just that they thought ‘Sandinista’ was a cool name and that poster of Ché was the dogs knackers) has been ruined by this tawdry commerciality.

You’ll be telling me that anti-globalisation heart-throb Damon Albarn has flogged his music to planet-destroying British Gas next…

1
DougieJ | 2 December 2009 - 1:57pm

Not Damon Albarn

..he really loves sticking it to the man.
I think from now on I'll just stick with the albums and not worry about all the other stuff that should grate.
BTW: What was the last 'London Calling' reissue with the Guy Stevens home videos all about then if a new one is coming out?

0
PaddyH | 2 December 2009 - 2:27pm

this is a half remembered

memory (see my recent secret affair tv thing) but in 1979/80 we used to go to "Halfpennys" spice shop* next to our secondary school as well as "jawbreakers" and these little 2p home made flavourless lollies I remember that for a brief period you could get tiny replica lp sleeves with a pink disc of dryish "choddy" (some say "chuddy", some say "Chungy" some say well boring southerners "chewing gum") in the shape of a little record. One of the sleeves was Neil Diamonds OST "Jazz singer" and another I'n sure was Mr Simonon smashing up his strat** so it's been going on for a while. Sorry can't get internet proof anyone else remember these?

*in our enclave of medieval south yorkshire sweets were called "spice".
** cue deluge of guitar spoddery correcting me!

0
Chris G | 2 December 2009 - 2:43pm

Fender P-Bass wasn't it?

0
stimpy | 2 December 2009 - 3:55pm

What a great memory

I would love some London Calling chewing gum - thus I am rendered an unwilling and illogical hypocrite...

0
PaddyH | 2 December 2009 - 3:17pm

Turning rebellion into

footwear just doesn't have the same ring(tone) to it but people will vote with their feet. I'm abstaining. By the way, the Clash split up a long time ago. One of them's dead, one's incapacitated, one's lovely but a bit damaged and the other's a painter. They had their vital time but, like Bowie or Mikhail Gorbachev, it passed. History repeats itself, wait and see - it has to: no one listens.

0
Paul Bernays | 3 December 2009 - 1:15am

Strikes me as the same as ever...

Strikes me it's the same as a Che Guevara tee shirt - the wearer advertising their loyalties (or the loyalties they wish people to think/believe they have), serviced by the fine upstanding altruistic capitalist vendors of same. Political or otherwise.
Now, I'll just put on my vintage Del Amitri "Change Everything" tee and all will be well.

0
Harold Holt | 3 December 2009 - 5:53am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2010 Development Hell Ltd