Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

They won the battle but lost the war?

daddyclark's picture

A couple of recent mentions of Oasis & Blur reminded me of that week one summer when two "indie" bands made the national news and not just the cover of the NME for once, when they "battled" for the number one spot in the charts. Even then as an early twentysomething I realised it was mostly hype & industry BS but it was quite exciting to see my music in the national media (this never happened to the mighty Carter the Unstoppable Sex Machine!) The gloss was taken off a little by the fact that the Oasis song was not their finest and the Blur one (possibly the side I was on) was certainly one of their worst songs. However once the dust settled recieved wisdom was that although Blur won the race to number one the following rise of Oasis eclipsed them hence winning the "war". And then Oasis started to become a little samey whilst Blur changed musical direction and became interesting again, the pendulum swung back and so on and so on. So my questions:-
1.For those who appreciate the finer points of Britpop is who was your winner (at the time or since) - if you're a Britpop denier no "they're both S**T" comments please.
2.For those of a different musical persuation are their any parallels where by bands / artists regularly had spats real or hyped at other points in the history of pop?
Over to you..

0

Damon Albarn

Damon won everything. Actually no, Paul Weller came out of Britpop better than anybody, although that may just be coincidence that he was entering a more productive phase at the same time.

But back to Damon, Blur did well, but I actually prefer Gorillaz and they probably wouldn't have been possible if Blur hadn't been successful.

1
SimonL | 25 January 2012 - 10:09pm

The Good, The Bad And The Queen

is a pretty damn fine album too.

3
Sting Ono | 25 January 2012 - 10:22pm

Appreciate the finer points of Britpop?

Pulp? Suede?

1
happy harry | 25 January 2012 - 10:27pm

Babies

is the best song of the 90s as far as I'm concerned.

1
SimonL | 25 January 2012 - 11:05pm

Short term Blur won -

they got the number 1.
Mid term Oasis won - they had a huge number 2 in Wonderwall and record-breaking album sales (and this after the weasely music press gave The Great Escape fantastic reviews)
Long term Blur won - better albums and reinventions to come, great career for Damon, decent career and sober respect for Graham, This Week etc for Dave, great reunion etc etc*

*Except for the cheese. Enough with the cheese already. The cheese is a terrible idea, tastes even worse and makes me close to disliking Mr James.

3
Mr Fade | 25 January 2012 - 10:28pm

You're absolutely on the money

Pretty good assessment. Oasis, for all their slavery to rock classicism forgot one salient point: You're a band, you should stay together (ie don't change the line up).

In 94 I preferred Parklife to DM, in 95 I listened to WTS(MG) an awful lot and found TGE very hard to love. In 97, blur trumped BHN.

Remember the rapturous Mojo article in the studio with blur recording TGE? Select magazine in a box? Oh 1995, if I'd only known how great you were at the time... (then again, Take That did split up, so it wasn't all roses)

1
DrJ | 26 January 2012 - 11:09am

Cliche Time

At the risk of trotting out a football cliche. I think it was actually us that were the winners. I think pop/rock music needs a focus every now and then and, with grunge and baggy just before, they seemed to be coming think and fast.
There will always be hangers on with record company execs scrambling over themselves to just sign someone (will that ever happen again?) but there will also be artists that hang on the "movement's" coat tails and get exposure that they otherwise might have trouble in getting. With punk I think Elvis Costello was a major beneficiary (and by extension we were) and with Britpop the atmosphere was ripe for Pulp who had been previously ignored by the masses.
I'd rather have the option to ignore a band that I don't really like than to never hear a band I may love just because they didn't quite fit so you never heard them.
I suppose these arguments are no longer relevant but they were during the Britpop years.

1
JohnW | 25 January 2012 - 11:10pm

It's funny

It was the moment when everything in that scene began to go downhill and for the first time where a consensus of 'Britpop' began to form in the wider culture, resulting in cartoon strips about Blur in The Sun and guides printed in the Daily Mail about how to 'talk Britpop'. At the time it was tremendously exciting, it did feel like a storming of the barricades, but it also ushered in an era of conformity when many of the cliches that people associate with Britpop - also ran indie bands in check shirts - began to take hold.

In effect the battle of Britpop marked the moment when an endless glut of brilliant records by extremely diverse and talented acts between April '94 and October '95 began to dry up and the imagination, verve, wit, stylishness and irreverance of the first wave was replaced by the cliched, single genre nonentities of the second wave. Between 94 and summer 95 barely a week went by without me queuing up outside the record shop on a Monday to buy a record by Oasis, Blur, Black Grape, Massive Attack, Tricky, the Prodigy, Pulp, Supergrass, Portishead, Radiohead, the Chemical Brothers, Coldcut, Goldie, Elastica, These Animal Men....There was so much energy, creativity and excitement around at that time - Weller certainly look inspiration from it. And everyone stopped dressing like the Levellers.

When Oasis got their first number one with 'Some Might Say', I walked to the school bus stop the next morning feeling like I'd scored the winning goal in a World Cup Final. It was a victory for me as much as them, or it felt like that. The battle of Britpop was the beginning of the end.

Anyway (ahem) more of this in my forthcoming book......hem hem....sorry.

3
Chimney Singing... | 25 January 2012 - 11:39pm

That post

Sums up almost exactly how I felt at the time and why I'm unlikely to ever write a book.

0
daddyclark | 26 January 2012 - 7:06pm

Weller

Ahead of the arc with Wild Wood then commercial Renaissance yet creatively going downhill when he started to believe the Modfather bullshit around the time of Stanley Road.

0
Six Dog | 25 January 2012 - 11:53pm

Weller

I love his music, but I own about 15 songs between 1995 and 2005. I really thought Weller had lost it.

0
SimonL | 26 January 2012 - 12:33am

Blur albums ...

... post Great Escape (which was pretty much Parklife 2) were all excellent - "Blur" had three cracking singles - Beetlebum, Song 2 and M.O.R. "13" is a real grower of an album but "Think Tank", for me, is the best of the lot - even without Coxon.

0
Formbyman | 26 January 2012 - 12:05am

I own

1 Oasis album
0 Blur albums

I bought the Oasis one a good three years after release.

To continue the battle/war theme, if Blur are Britain and Oasis Germany, then America, as in WW2, come out the winner.

Who's America? Pulp, maybe. Weller, maybe. Albarn the solo artist?

I look back on that era with a great deal of fondness, compared to today. At least then I bought new music by new artists, and loved it. Can't say that I do as much of that nowadays

0
sitheref2409 | 26 January 2012 - 1:27am

I'm trying to recall

what I was listening to at the time as I certainly wasn't digging the Britpop thing at all. Probably lots of Drum and Bass, something called Dream Pop which later morphed into 'Post Rock', lots of abstract, weird electronica like Future Sound of London. How ironic that they've now produced Noel's next waxing.

If I had to pick one of those acts it has to be The Blur, great Pop singles and some great melancholy and moody album tracks.

As for Rock and Pop rivalry, well I recall Take That and East 17 were pitched as rival bands but also had rival groups of fans who would regularly duff each other up over who was best, Little Marky Owen or Criminal Boy from ver 17. I seem to remember E17s fans in particular had a rather fearsome reputation. Much earler I also recall a bit of rivalry between The Spands and the Durans as well, but they never really exploited it for publicity like Oasis and Blur did. They did once go head to head on Mike Read's Pop Quiz though, that's about as serious as it got.

0
Dr Volume | 26 January 2012 - 4:15am

Well, Carter USM won the battle...

...with Pip Schofield by a rugby tackle knockout at the Smash Hits Poll Winners Party ... was that the one where Radiohead played My Iron Lung to a confused crowd of tweens?

Anyhoo ... Schofield arguably won the war by getting to spend so much time with, er, Holly Willoughby, er ... yes I see this is all so subjective isn't it?

0
alakurt | 26 January 2012 - 9:29am

The winners were........the Manic Street Preachers

Absolutely at the bottom of the barrell following Richey's disappearance, half empty gig descending into riotous carnage, The Holy Bible shifting less than 40,000 copies despite it's (relative)critical success.

The Manics came back with "Everything Must Go" - a comeback gig supporting The Stone Roses at Wembley Arena ('it's only us') and their future shifted entirely on one little couplet...

" We don't talk about love, we only want to get drunk "

That for all the wrong reasons tapped into Loaded psyche of the time, teaming up with Underworld's (lager, lager, lager, lager) lyric from Born Slippy.

When a butterfly flaps its wings and all that...

2
Six Dog | 26 January 2012 - 11:24am

I hated Blur.

In those days I was in full possession of, not so much a chip on my shoulder, as a full on boulder regarding London and the south. For all of my remembered life (this was the mid nineties) I had been living under a tory government which not one single human being of my acquaintance had ever voted for. Plainly this was entirely the fault of those wankers from London and the south and this therefore meant that Blur were simply evil. Plus they were Essex boys pretending to be from London! Even worse! Posh bastards pretending to be poor: I wanted to wring Damon Albarn's neck and as for that Alex James, appropriate torment for that arsehole I couldn't even conceive, I hated that prick so much.

I now fully accept that Oasis were one album wonders (and it wasn't Morning Glory), that Blur evolved and did interesting and superior things and that also in those days I had a hell of a lot of growing up to do. Living as I now do in London (trust me when I say no one is more shocked about this than me), it all seems rather silly how wrapped up in this thing I was.

But you know, perhaps I wasn't actually as wrong as I thought...

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/4068586/Why-fast-food-is-o...

1
ganglesprocket | 26 January 2012 - 11:56am

Was thinking of beginning a thread but thought again

- after much talk on a.n. other thread about the Apollo moon landings and Mr James Blast's recent powerful post WRT emerging from depression - about how much the song "Saturn 5" by Inspiral Carpets means to me. It was Morrissey who sang, with typical understatement, about "the songs that saved your life", and my first time hearing the optimism in that song was a tonic for me and the beginning of a climb out of a solid couple of years of dark fog. (There were other factors, obviously).
It may be hard to believe but a succession of great records of the Britpop period, commencing with Saturn 5 at the start of 94 played a huge part in my return to the world of people.

If this seems like a non sequitur don't forget Noel G was a roadie for the Carpets, possibly his best work IMHO.

1
STD | 26 January 2012 - 11:57am

Wasn't this just a re-run of the 60s?

For those of a different musical persuation are their any parallels where by bands / artists regularly had spats real or hyped at other points in the history of pop?

I realise that we are all far to young to remember but wasn't there a much hyped spat between The Beatles and The Stones? It was all media talk I believe (since the first Stones hit was written by Lennon/McCartney) but certainly appears to have been a precursor to Blur/Oasis.

I'll leave the Massive to decide who won the battle/war out of those two

0
Humphrey Plugg | 26 January 2012 - 12:09pm

There never was a spat between the two.

Andrew Loog Oldham (who started off working for the Beatles) certainly deliberately manipulated the Stones' image as that of 'the anti-Beatles', but there was never any animosity between the two groups.

0
Paolo Meccano | 26 January 2012 - 12:35pm

I did suggest it was a media invention

Ok - here's another one - Notorious B.I.G v 2Pac

Now that puts the handbags between Blur and Oasis into the shade

0
Humphrey Plugg | 26 January 2012 - 12:46pm

I'm saying that there wasn't...

...'a much-hyped spat between the two' to the best of my knowledge.

Now, Ray Davies - he seemed to be one to hold grudges...

0
Paolo Meccano | 26 January 2012 - 1:03pm

That's my memory too

There was rivalry, but never a spat.

In those days the rivalries were really productive. There were also rivalries between The Beatles and The Byrds and The Beatles and The Beach Boys, buth not AFAIK between the Beach Boys and The Byrds. As well as general rivalry between all the main bands including The Kinks, The Who The Animals and maybe a couple of others.

There was also that early / mid 70s rivalry between the Stones and thhe Who over the title "greatest rock n roll band in the world".

0
Carl Parker | 26 January 2012 - 1:24pm

The BIG rivalry was of course...

...between The Fabs and the Dave Clark Five.

The Mersey Beat vs. The Tottenham Sound.

I think we know who won that one (although to be fair, Mr Clark did well industry-wise once he gave up the tubthumping).

0
Paul Waring | 26 January 2012 - 8:31pm

The Number One battle

was a rather hollow affair due largely to the fact that both of the singles were pretty poor efforts. That said I always preferred Blur simply because they were more diverse and "edgy" musically and lyrically. There was a sense they had a more interesting record collection with plenty of contemporary stuff alongside the classics. Noel could write a belting tune but there was always the feeling that he was working simply from the vaunted Tablets of Rock rather than from any musical self-awareness or a desire to push either himself or the boundaries. The band's "image" didn't really help with this perception, Noel sounding like the one bright spark in a room of dim-bulbs. With Blur I was never quite sure what would come next even when they were in their Brit-pop phase. They'd already reinvented themselves before Brit-pop (The "post-baggy" Leisure giving way to "return to the 60s" Modern Life is Rubbish is where they started that process)so the groundwork had already been laid for them to do it again without fear of compromise or having to plough the same furrow. And unlike Oasis they went on to produce better singles AND albums and did so convincingly without having to look over their shoulder at past glories quite as much as Oasis did with subsequent output. In terms of the front-men Liam increasingly became the empty vessel making the loudest noise by living off his glory days while Damon simply carried on looking for new ones.

0
Ahh_Bisto | 26 January 2012 - 12:41pm

You know what though

Bonehead is hilarious. Seriously. That's not a joke. He is a very witty, funny man.

Not that it particularly illustrates it, but any excuse to post Bonehead's Bank Holiday

'She was with her mum who had a face like a nun in pain', indeed.

0
Chimney Singing... | 26 January 2012 - 12:58pm

I met Noel once in the

early days after a gig. I was pretty enthusiastic about his drummer. "You've got a great drummer there" I said, "He's shit I'm going to fire him" was his reply. I still think I was right and he was wrong...

0
Mr Fade | 26 January 2012 - 7:29pm

I absolutely agree

With that. I think Alan White changed their sound for the worse - they lost that thrilling wall of noise. Tony McCarroll's book is a very very interesting read

0
Chimney Singing... | 26 January 2012 - 8:02pm

Is it just me...

...who thinks Noel only got Alan White in because he's Paul Weller's drummer's brother..?

0
Paolo Meccano | 27 January 2012 - 12:39pm

Might be something in it

But I think it was to do with the fact that he felt the drums on 'Wonderwall' needed more ability than the more 'straightforward' approach of Mr McCarroll

0
Chimney Singing... | 27 January 2012 - 12:47pm

Robbie Williams?

It could be argued that Blur v Oasis and Britpop showed there was an audience for a UK pop act who were able to play the common people card. Blur and Oasis didn't go after this audience, and Robbie Williams quickly built a career by doing just that.

0
Hawkfall | 27 January 2012 - 6:16am

Here's how it's really done

In Norwegian Black Metal, at least.

I give you: Count Grishnackh vs Euronymous

Both were members of "Mayhem", who were kind of a big deal if you were Scandinavian, hard of hearing and death-obsessed in the early 90s. Other members included "Hellhammer", who used to wear a necklace made of skull fragments collected after the suicide of the band's first lead singer, and the charmingly-named bassist "Necrobutcher". They both looked and sounded as preposterous as you can probably imagine.

Over a period of months in 1993 intra-band tensions simmered, finally exploding in August of that year when Grishnackh went to visit his guitar player, ostensibly to discuss an unsigned contract.

Whether they ever got down to the nitty gritty of discussing indemnities and boilerplate provisions over tea and biscuits we shall never know, because a dispute broke out early in the meeting, and ended with the good Count stabbing Euronymous stabbing 23 times, 16 of them in the back.

The wounds were, of course, fatal. Grishnackh's defence was that he believed that Euronymous was planning to taser him, take him to a nearby woodland and torture him to death on camera. Unsurprisingly, the defence failed and Grishnackh was sentenced to 21 years for murder, and I believe they also tacked some church arsons onto the back of the charge for good measure (at the time of his arrest he had 150kg of dynamite in his house, stashed for future adventures).

There is a happy ending though - Grishnackh turned his back on satanism while in prison, and was released in 2009. I imagine he's probably a cardigan-wearing acoustic singer-songwriter today.

I'm still trying to work out who is Blur and who is Oasis in this scenario. Apparently Necrobutcher will never shut up about cheese, so that's at least Alex James taken care of.

0
eminentdan1978 | 26 January 2012 - 1:13pm

kind of a big deal if you

kind of a big deal if you were Scandinavian, hard of hearing and death-obsessed in the early 90s.

Typical members of the Massive then?

I was going to suggest that this was where posting a YouTube clip was warranted, but a quick search there reveals that among the many very loud and badly filmed clips of the band is one that claims to be the "actual footage" of the murder, so I didn't.

Still, puts Liam and Noel's feuding into perspective.

0
Humphrey Plugg | 26 January 2012 - 4:03pm

Oh go on then...

I think it's fair to conclude that the murder robbed music lovers worldwide of a real thing of beauty.

I also note the "none-more Youtube" comment on the above link:

"I really hate to say this because I have nothing against Euronymous and I'm certainly not homophobic, but... killing someone because you think they might be gay is pretty metal."

0
eminentdan1978 | 26 January 2012 - 4:19pm

None more YouTube indeed

Maybe this "I'm no homophobe" eejit should give a listen to British Steel by Judas Priest, featuring confirmed bachelor Rob Halford. Now that's pretty metal.

0
Hawkfall | 26 January 2012 - 4:46pm

As an old friend of mine said about the Blur vs Oasis thing

The difference is that Blur are musicians. Maybe a little harsh but in essence he was proved to be correct

1
johna_online | 26 January 2012 - 1:45pm

Speaking as a working class Northener,

I was always on Blur's side.
Oasis are alright for a laugh, okay to put on in the background at a party & the Liam 'n' Noel show's kept me entertained for years.

However, Blur are in a Different Class, which brings me to the true kings of Britpop: Pulp.

Music made by & for misfits which crossed over to the appreciative masses. And a true star in the shape of Jarvis Cocker.

1
andielou | 26 January 2012 - 8:14pm

And

if my increasingly unreliable memory serves me correctly the Country House/ Roll With It chart battle took place in the shadow of Pulp's triumphant (one might even say era defining) headline show at Glastonbury 1995.

0
STD | 27 January 2012 - 6:51pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd