Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

The worst reviewer on Amazon?

LOUDspeaker's picture

I don't mean to be cruel but this is a comedy goldmine.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A2PYA53EN6UB7L/ref=cm_pdp_...

The shocking thing is, she's part of the Vine programme which means she gets free books etc from time to time to review.

2

That's just sad

Don't Amazon monitor those reviews? Clearly not.

It seems she doesn't have a spell checker on whatever it is she uses to write those reviews (predictive text on her phone, by looks of it).

0
mojoworking | 11 August 2011 - 10:05am

FYI

In one review from this year she said she was 25 and mentions being a student.

0
LOUDspeaker | 11 August 2011 - 10:07am

It would appear that the reviews

were written by a 10 year old, so in that case the person should be applauded for reading and reviewing at such a young age. Might grow up to be a fine critic one day, who knows.

0
Retro Man | 11 August 2011 - 10:07am

@dmuper

So this is what he does in his spare time...

1
Paul Waring | 11 August 2011 - 10:10am

Some things to note:

She firmly believes, "that all childrens art should be sustainable and incorporate recycled materials where possible" GROLIES alert!

She's a student. I wonder of what.

She's learning French. Oh good.

She now at least knows what erotic capital is, even if she doesn't know how to get it. She clearly doesn't wanna destroy passer by.

Which is nice

And the "best book I have ever read" is New Moon (Twilight Saga).

Best of all: "...and speaking as someone who has been in a coma". Where would you ever need to say that?

What interests me is, given the low numbers of "people found the following review helpful" stats attached to these things, how did she get onto the Vine programme? I'm in it but had to put a fair bit more effort in than this.

1
illuminatus | 11 August 2011 - 10:23am

The answer to this may be "go look it up on Amazon"

but I hadn't heard of it until this thread. What's it all about? How did you get in?

0
fortuneight | 11 August 2011 - 10:24am

I just wrote lots of reviews for stuff

Luckily, people seemed to comment on them and were generally positive (at the moment I've reviewed 109 items and have just over 1000 helpful votes - around 83% or so of the votes I've had). I didn't apply: they mailed me and asked if I wanted in.

It may also be that I buy a fair amount of stuff from there. My last purchases were the two Doctor Phibes movies and Filthy English, which will all be getting reviewed soon, I think.

1
illuminatus | 11 August 2011 - 10:31am

GROLIES...

I had to go and look up what that meant but, rest assured, I'll now use it at every opportunity!

0
stimpy | 11 August 2011 - 10:31am

At least she's reading and enjoying it

We should applaud rather than mock.

We can't all be Matthew Arnold.

3
Five-Centres | 11 August 2011 - 10:29am

None of us

are Matthew Arnold around here.

Thank God. Not sure I could take that.

0
illuminatus | 11 August 2011 - 11:28am

A small detail,

but I like that she ends her two line review of some cardboard boxes with a kiss.

2
kidpresentable | 11 August 2011 - 10:47am
fortuneight | 11 August 2011 - 10:50am

You know what I love about the internet?

Anyone can do it. Anyone at all.

Mind you, that's also what I hate about the internet.

2
mojoworking | 11 August 2011 - 10:53am

Her views on the oeuvre of Anal Cunt...

are notable by their absence.

1
Patrick Crowther | 11 August 2011 - 11:03am

We are all Frankies

Jason A Parkes appears to have written hundreds of reviews on Amazon. He knows his stuff, but is a bit earnest, and in fact makes me think of my own worst aspects when I read his reviews. It makes me want to lighten up and take things less seriously.

Fair play to him though.

0
Devadip Cliff R... | 11 August 2011 - 11:19am

he's also on head heritage

and probably here. the guy has very good taste, in my etc.
also has the same surname as me.

0
drilltime | 11 August 2011 - 1:50pm

Maybe when she says she *has* been in a coma,

she really means she *still is* in a coma. Which would make her output a) fogivable and b) extraordinary.

I love the bit where she says, "It read so well it could have been a memoire..." Eh?

Mind you, it didn't half remind me of the old line about eating alphabet soup and crapping better work.

1
Mark JF | 11 August 2011 - 11:27am

There's this chap

that does reviews on Isle Of Wight local news blog Ventnorblog

http://ventnorblog.com/topic/review/film-reviews-review/

They are so amazingly badly written as to be unintelligible:

"Accentuating the positive factors of a heavily biased film that keeps to the formula that anything connected to the subject of Bagdad must therefore be filmed with cinema-verite style is just one of the points accentuated by ‘The Hurt Locker’."

Er - what?

2
Jason Carter | 11 August 2011 - 11:39am

The Dorain Gray review

"The adaptation of Oscar Wildes’ most recognised work ‘The Portrait of Dorian Gray’, could easily have kept so accurately to the book that it would have become as difficult to tune to what is at times a difficult level of writing to accept."

is so strangulated that it's just popped out of its own abdominal wall.

0
illuminatus | 11 August 2011 - 11:44am

In The Heat Of The Night

His review states:

In essence, the opposed performances of Sidney Poitier and George Seagal manage to clash in such melodramatic levels of acting, that the question of Sidney Poitier’s character of Mr Tibbs (a police officer working in homicide who is journeying through the south of America), at certain points becomes a case of questioning how innocent his character really is.

George Segal?

0
Ahh_Bisto | 11 August 2011 - 12:25pm

Or George Seagull

considering the reviewer's location.

*Proudly grabs coat and saunters off to lunch*

1
milkybarnick | 11 August 2011 - 12:31pm

Worse than that

George Seagal/Segal/Seagull wasn't even in the film.

0
Ahh_Bisto | 11 August 2011 - 1:37pm

I know

it was Steven Seagal.

0
jimmyshoes01 | 11 August 2011 - 2:10pm

??!??

"In a staggering two hours approximation there are two impressive scenes of approximately a few minutes of anything remotely worthy of any consideration. The futile efforts are magnified by such scenes of immense boorish-ness such as two characters punching each other in the stomach, while in one room."

Sourced from: http://ventnorblog.com/2011/07/15/liam-maddens-film-review-the-hurt-lock...
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Share Alike

It reads like it was written in a different language and then translated with a free internet tool, with grammar and meaning scattered all over the place.

0
LOUDspeaker | 11 August 2011 - 12:30pm

Repo Man

However alarming the career path of the various actors and actresses within ‘Repo Man’ continued or stalled, the simple demonstrated fact that this was an independent film made with such quotable and nearly missed dialogue, that there is never a beat or frame missed throughout such an admirable work.

For a moment I wondered what "nearly missed dialogue" was.

Then I realised I was actually reading some.

0
Ahh_Bisto | 11 August 2011 - 12:55pm
tkdmart | 11 August 2011 - 1:39pm

Brilliant

At £1.18, how can you say no!

0
kidpresentable | 11 August 2011 - 1:50pm

you can review

items yet to be released, or certainly re-issues. i have been sorely tempted to make this a form of gratification. but not for the artists involved obviously.

0
drilltime | 11 August 2011 - 1:53pm

in fact!!

Can someone please tell me the difference between a credible, worthless, funny or plain nasty review.
(clue - rhymes with hero)

0
drilltime | 11 August 2011 - 1:55pm

see also

trip advisor

0
drilltime | 11 August 2011 - 1:56pm

I wish

I was as positive as Ms L, Bolton.

0
Bruised Mike | 11 August 2011 - 2:23pm

As Coral Browne said

"Listen, dear, you couldn't write 'fuck' on a dusty Venetian blind."

0
hubertrawlinson | 13 August 2011 - 1:30pm
itfc1959 | 13 August 2011 - 1:55pm

More comedy with Amazon reviews

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B003NE4V4G/ref=s9_cartx_co_g74_ir02?p...

Never heard of this film, My Last Five Girlfriends, that was recommended to me after I bought something on Amazon.

So I clicked on it and saw that it had three reviews, all of them five stars.

There was something fishy about the wording. They were all rather similar and oddly preoccupied with the state of the British film industry.

I clicked on the names to see their reviews. One of them only reviewed this one film. Another has a few other reviews, but also a review for a book about acting - which is suspicious. And the third one only reviewed this film and a book by Tim Harford (a person with connections to Alain de Botton who wrote the novel this film is based upon).

0
LOUDspeaker | 15 August 2011 - 2:22pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd