Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

The Word Blog Guide to The Word Blog

Dave Amitri's picture

It is not unusual for newcomers to this wonderful place to cause a bit of a kerfuffle, in most instances it is not deliberate, they just get caught unawares. If you are newly arrived from one of the other millions of blog sites avaialable on the web the humour, tolerance and general camaraderie (occasional pedantry excepted) of this place is unusual and unexpected. Don't get me started on football blogs. Anyway, yes there is the FAQ and Frasers firm but fair hand but I think we should prepare our own users version of the do's and dont's that make this THE blog to belong and contribute to. Here's mine.

Even if you are obsessed with a moderately popular 80's / 90's band from Scotland you should not assume that by repeatedly mentioning them that other people will feel the same love. Learn when enough is enough and move on.

Over to you.

0

Be nice

but if you can't be nice, at least be entertainng.

0
illuminatus | 9 February 2010 - 12:27pm

Desist

from using the word "genius". It is the most overused (and inappropriate) word on this blog.

0
billyous | 9 February 2010 - 12:30pm

Beware of dissing prog rock.

Even though it's mostly rubbish.

5
ganglesprocket | 9 February 2010 - 12:32pm

For example...

I'm not rising to this!

Much prog rock is excellent, but let's leave that to another thread.

0
Baskerville Old Face | 9 February 2010 - 2:08pm

Don't pretend to be on a higher cultural plane than anyone else

And if you've genuinely not heard of Danny Dyer, EastEnders, Simon Cowell or Rhianna, Google them.

5
Five-Centres | 9 February 2010 - 12:33pm

"Google" them?

6
nicktf | 9 February 2010 - 8:16pm

It is unadvisable

To mention Heather Mills.

2
Spartacus Mills | 9 February 2010 - 12:44pm

Yes!

It makes Mr. Bounce hopping mad!

0
Billybob Dylan | 21 February 2010 - 4:33am

Careful with sarcasm

Inflections and intentions are often misinterpreted in plain text

2
Joe R | 9 February 2010 - 12:52pm

Remember that..

..just because you think Belle and Sebastien are shite, it doesn't mean that they are.

Or so others will have you believe.

1
Lenny Law | 9 February 2010 - 12:52pm

Oi!

B&S are a fantastic band. If you come over here and say that, I'll scratch you with a hair slide and hit you over the head with a satchel

6
Joe R | 9 February 2010 - 1:12pm

Don't announce your retirement

and then come back a month later, feeling slightly foolish.
(Hi everyone.)

11
Adman | 9 February 2010 - 12:59pm

I increasingly wonder...

...why people feel the need to contribute to threads merely to say they're not interested in the subject.

Rarely happens here, I'm pleased to say.

0
johnlyons121 | 9 February 2010 - 1:00pm

Annoyances

Oh that annoys me so much. Like people who reply to "help" posts on tech forums just to say "yes, I've got that problem too, but I don't know how to solve it either"

0
ainsley009 | 10 February 2010 - 10:29am

Please

try and keep your posts fairly short. We prefer The Great Gatsby to War and Peace.

0
Carl Parker | 9 February 2010 - 1:00pm

Write as though you have a beard

even if you're a girl.

1
Uncle Monty | 9 February 2010 - 1:05pm

That would work just as well the other way round

And the bathroom would be 'all nice'.

4
Richard Lowe | 9 February 2010 - 1:16pm

OK - write like you have a nice bathroom

...but not like you have a bidet

0
Uncle Monty | 9 February 2010 - 2:28pm

Never, ever use the "N" word

Nickelback .... there I said it ...

0
fortuneight | 9 February 2010 - 1:13pm

Don't worry too much if..

Don't get upset if you start what you think'll be a really interesting thread and it gets no comments. It's pretty random what gets picked up.

2
Lying Doggo | 9 February 2010 - 1:17pm

A corollary

Don't get upset if you post a thread that doesn't get picked up and then sometime later someone takes your idea, re-posts it and it then turns into a runner.

3
Carl Parker | 9 February 2010 - 1:42pm

Bonio IS a twat

and he doesn't NEED to wear the stupid sunglasses for spurious medical reasons.

Don't bother trying to convince the massive otherwise.

2
stimpy | 9 February 2010 - 1:20pm

We're not all in the media

It would be easy to get the impression that we're all involved in the media or music biz or something. When we had a 'reveal' thread, we turned out to have a good cross-section of jobs.

1
Lying Doggo | 9 February 2010 - 1:21pm

Some people do just like...

The Electric Light Orchestra however cheesy you think they are. Get over it and move on.

1
Trevor_Raggatt | 9 February 2010 - 1:24pm

I'm trying, honestly...

... it's just so difficult.

1
Formbyman | 9 February 2010 - 8:07pm

Ellen's Law (with apologies to Godwin)

"As a Word Blog discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Richard Thompson, Bob Dylan or Van Morrison approaches 1."

4
Trevor_Raggatt | 9 February 2010 - 1:27pm

HMHB

you can add half man half biscuit to that list.

1
paulwright | 9 February 2010 - 2:24pm

Except

I fancied that that should be Blackwell's Law

0
illuminatus | 9 February 2010 - 4:58pm

It's a thrill

to see your posting in the hot topics

1
Beany | 9 February 2010 - 1:30pm

But

don't overcook the goose

0
Beany | 9 February 2010 - 1:30pm

With

multiple postings...unless you have something meaningful to say

0
Beany | 9 February 2010 - 1:32pm

Don't forget you're talking to real people

Again, it's much better here than on other forums... but still bears repeating.

Imagine the Word blog as a conversation in a pub*. Join in, whether you agree or disagree... but remember it's good mannered & good natured here.

Sometimes the anonymity of the internet means people get a bit rude or aggressive when I'm sure they wouldn't "in real life".

So, whether it's about Bruce Springsteen's work or the use of another poster's grammar... don't say anything you wouldn't be happy to say directly to another person's face.

* Next Word London bloggers real life conversation in a pub: Friday 26th March. all welcome. (apols for threadjack)

5
Hannah | 9 February 2010 - 1:37pm

Threadjack?

Man, I love Threadjack - saw them live in '92 at The Borderline...

However, obscure or unknown you think the artist you love is - someone round these parts will not only love them too - but probably played bass with them.

4
Sheev | 10 February 2010 - 11:05pm

Like Fireworks

If you've pressed the 'post comment' button, do not return to the 'post comment' button. Otherwise, you'll multipost.

0
Spartacus Mills | 9 February 2010 - 1:39pm

The Word is just a great big opinion

Do not respond to an opinion with which you disagree by using either of the following phrases:
"Oh well, each to their own".
"If you don't like it, don't listen to/read/watch it" (delete as applicable).
These phrases are the enemies of this website and their proliferation could threaten its existence.

The correct approach is to fight your corner, even though all reason and the cumulative knowledge of the human race might indicate very clearly that you are wrong.

0
Nick White | 9 February 2010 - 2:03pm

The answer is quite often

David Bowie

0
moleye151 | 9 February 2010 - 2:16pm

Please Please Please

Post about punk/Industrial. No matter how many times you get told it's not "proper" music ignore the prog mafia.

0
Doug B | 9 February 2010 - 2:20pm

Andrew Collins

Any post about anything Andrew Collins has written will divide the massive. Tread carefully. And don't mention the squirrels...

0
Red Umpire | 9 February 2010 - 2:28pm

do you mean...

The Persuasionists Hitmaker?

3
Uncle Monty | 9 February 2010 - 2:30pm

But don't forget

the silent 's' kids!

1
illuminatus | 9 February 2010 - 5:01pm

Don't promote your own blog / website

Unless it's really funny or has one of those Downfall parodies on it.

0
Handsome.P.Wonderful | 9 February 2010 - 2:42pm

Blogs

Agreed. One or two of these have crept in recently - this should lead to instant rebuke and the e-equivalent of a big red marker from Mr Lewry.

I might be interested in a listing once in a while so I can have a look at a few Massive blogs, but let's keep them out of the forums day to day.

0
ainsley009 | 10 February 2010 - 10:34am

Blog promotion

Generally I will delete posts that self-promote, but I can't monitor 24/7, and sometimes I'll let something slide if there's been a healthy response to the original entry.

0
Fraser Lewry | 10 February 2010 - 10:38am

Advice from BobD

Don't criticise what you don't understand.

0
Captain Underpants | 9 February 2010 - 2:58pm

When you post a You Tube hosted video in a thread

Please include just a few words to say what it is. Remember that some members of the massive have slow or severely restricted Internet access and cannot/are not allowed to watch You Tube.*

Even if we can't watch the clip, we might want to know what is, in your opinion, the best ever bass solo/guitar break/hand-clapping/scary kids movie etc..

*(yes, we know all about VPNs, Tor and Foxy Proxy - try streaming using these 'solutions').

2
James EB | 9 February 2010 - 2:43pm

Seconded...!

I can't see photos or videos posted on the Blog during the day and it is very frustrating being teased by reading others enthusing about "the best ever song", "this great new band", "what a wonderful video" when you don't know what is being discussed.

You can imagine the rush to get home when I saw the thread about "Lady Ga-Ga's exploding nipples"!

0
Retro Man | 9 February 2010 - 2:51pm

Thirded

And limited access to Spotify too

0
fortuneight | 9 February 2010 - 4:03pm

<phew>

it's not just me then

1
James EB | 9 February 2010 - 5:06pm

1. Please don't be snobbish about Punk Rock...

or bands that "can't play their instruments very well", remember some of those bands might have had a very big impact on certain Blogger's lives (well, that's me then isn't it...?!).

1
Retro Man | 9 February 2010 - 2:45pm

And please don't be inversely snobbish about Prog

We all know it can be a bit daft and pompous at times, but many of us still have a small, warm place in our heart for Tales From Topographic Oceans.

1
Handsome.P.Wonderful | 9 February 2010 - 2:50pm

Seconded to both!

I was making the same point down below.

*inserts smiley*

0
el hombre malo | 9 February 2010 - 2:57pm

some of us aren't embarrassed to admit

owning and liking some Goth music

2
James Blast | 9 February 2010 - 4:01pm

By the same token

Some of us have spent years and years mastering our instrument and believe that those hard-earned chops have some value ;-)

2
stimpy | 9 February 2010 - 3:24pm

and I was going to get my guitar...

... out this morning for a bit of a strum - then I saw those Nils Lofgren video posts and thought what's the point - and the bugger can bloody play piano as well!

1
Formbyman | 9 February 2010 - 6:14pm

It's like a pub

I see this place as like a friendly pub, with a range of people in it - we don't all like the same music, but we are bound together by feeling strongly about music.

Sometimes things you say will be misinterpreted - sometimes you will misunderstand someone else. I have found the easiest thing to do is to ask for clarification in case I have picked someone up wrong, and also to apologise if I have upset or annoyed someone. This nearly always leads to a friendly reconciliation.

I prefer threads where we talk about things we like, as opposed to things we don't like. There are many bands who I cannot stand (for a range of reasons from pomposity to twiddliness to ... anyway) but I do try to resist the temptation to stick the boot into them when they are mentioned. Some of them are other people's favourite bands and I accept that my near irrational loathing of (it really doesn't matter who they are, it's a general point) is not going to change the opinion of a poster who has a fond memory soundtracked by that band.

Considering this is the internet, we do generally all rub along pretty well with each other, and that is a Good Thing.

0
el hombre malo | 9 February 2010 - 2:52pm

Kindly

Don't assume that because you reside within the confines of the M25 you are somehow more clued up than the majority of contributors from the remainder of the planet.

0
torrential1 | 9 February 2010 - 3:01pm

Does that really happen here?

I know the meedja at large is very London-centric and obviously The Word is based in London's glittering Islington, but I don't find this site following those trends.

There's a bit of gentle ribbing about the supposed North/South divide (personal bugbear that it ends up being the North/London divide, there are other places in the South, you know) and the meet-ups have been in London (though others are planned) but this isn't nme.com. Just because something's from Hoxton, doesn't mean it's good.

5
Joe R | 9 February 2010 - 3:14pm

As a Northerner

I don't think it does. There's been a bit of fairly good natured banter about it from time to time, but all given (and taken) in good part. We are grown-up to realise that, usually, we are living somewhere we like at least a bit and are likely to speak up for it if asked.

2
illuminatus | 9 February 2010 - 11:50pm

Islington

As someone who both lives and works in Islington, I love the idea that it glitters. At the last count I believe it was something like the 8th most deprived borough in the country, and it's right up there when crime is counted. About 18 months ago five people were stabbed in two separate instances outside a club a few hundred yards from where I live... in one evening. I'm not claiming it's Bunk & McNulty territory round my way, and sure, there are some nice streets with big posh houses and neighbourhood gastro-pubs, but most of Islington simply isn't like that.

0
Fraser Lewry | 10 February 2010 - 9:17am

Oi!

Did you spill my balsamic vinegar?

2
Spartacus Mills | 10 February 2010 - 9:58am

That is not the case at all

I'm a northener living in London and don't have an axe to grind one way or the other. This is a very open forum, pulling in contributors from around the world, and from what I've seen any such elitism, should it appear, is politely dismissed.

2
Carl Parker | 9 February 2010 - 6:20pm

If someone gives you advice...

...pass it on...avoiding corporate bollocks (see separate thread)

Read The Word regularly (a subscription helps).

0
Baskerville Old Face | 9 February 2010 - 3:12pm

Don't explain the concept of an FPO...

... to your FPO.

4
ganglesprocket | 9 February 2010 - 3:18pm

Why not? It's a compliment

I don't know if my GLW is familiar with the concept of the FPO, or that I refer to her as such from time to time, but I think if I explained it to her she wouldn't mind. She'd just tut, raise her eyes to the heavens and say something along the lines of 'yes dear, that's why we've got a central heating system that works rather than a Rickenbacker 330 Fireglow 12 string guitar. Now get your feet off the table.'
Men tend to be a bit dafter than women and wives/partners tend to rein in their silliness and act as a civilising influence. To the benefit of both in the long run. And, of course, it can work the other way - I can think of a fair few couples where it's the man suggesting that maybe that fifth bottle of Chianti and 'a bit of a bop' at 4am might not be such a bright idea. And they're usually right.

0
Richard Lowe | 9 February 2010 - 7:33pm

I tried

And I've got the bruises to prove it.

0
Rigid Digit | 9 February 2010 - 7:43pm

It goes both ways in our house

I'm my FPO's IIR

Idiot In Residence.

1
Beezer | 9 February 2010 - 8:19pm

I ended up my FPO's IIR...

... in the spare room when this subject came up.

0
ganglesprocket | 9 February 2010 - 8:53pm

But most of all....

....don't pretend that your opinion is really controversial when it isn't. I've lost count of the number of times somebody has said, oh, something like that "The Shadows did neat dance steps" and then followed it with "retreats to safe distance". It implies that everyone else is easily gulled.

1
David Hepworth | 9 February 2010 - 3:37pm

Please grow a beard...

I was shocked and surprised at the wholesome and clean-shaven look adopted by The Word Bloggers at the recent pub get-together.

I'm meant to be the resident punk rocker complaining about the beards on each front cover and the championing of bands that sound like The Carpenters and look like extras out of The Waltons - and yet I was the only one who had a bloody beard!!

0
Retro Man | 9 February 2010 - 3:52pm

I've never had a beard...

... until I started reading The Word. Coincidence?

0
Reno Dakota | 9 February 2010 - 4:14pm

Don't assume everyone has access to Spotify

If you want us to hear one song that rocks your world, offer at least one alternative to the standard spotify link.

A little while ago somebody put up a beautiful collection of "shoegazing" tunes. I was even more impressed he used a slightly more international option of putting his selection up through Grooveshark.

I know Spotify is the business for sharing music - IF you have access to it. For those of us living outside the UK it sometimes feels like your friends have that super cool new toy that you know your parents can't afford to get.

0
seamuspuebla | 9 February 2010 - 3:53pm

Or at least provide the artist/track name as a bit of plain text

...cos a cryptic Spotify link is completely useless.

0
Harold Holt | 10 February 2010 - 4:45am

we worship at the feet of

Roberta from Spotify™

0
James Blast | 9 February 2010 - 4:06pm

Try not to describe

anything as "seminal" (unless you're talking about semen), and do not describe every double album as a "sprawling masterwork", even if it is - it's not even appealing when Stuart Maconie does it.

Please remember that not all of us live in London, and that despite what some of you might assume, Apple have a 14% (and not a 100%) share in the smartphone market; there is no-one more punchable than an apple fanboy in geek-talk overdrive.

Please remember that it is quite possible to enjoy both Eater AND Supertramp (but only just), that not all of us have an FPO and massivelets at home, and above all else please be mindful that this is a site that is mostly used by men, rather than a men's site. I hate to be a great big PC monkey, but the occasional moment of casual sexism is annoying, not because it's "right off", but because it's lazy and presumptuous.

And it's not daring to suggest that Simply Red, Phil Collins and Dire Straits have had their moments; merely true.

0
Pax Romana | 9 February 2010 - 4:21pm

And presumably...

...that goes for "Seminole" too?

3
Baskerville Old Face | 9 February 2010 - 4:56pm

Bingo!

.

1
James EB | 10 February 2010 - 4:46am

The Edinburgh Book Festival...

...managed to describe Andrea Dworkin as a 'seminal writer' a few years back. Her reaction is unrecorded, sadly.

0
Lando Cakes | 7 March 2010 - 8:45pm

apple fanboys

"there is no-one more punchable than an apple fanboy in geek-talk overdrive"

Except a Richard Thomposn fan in full flow. ;)

0
illuminatus | 8 March 2010 - 3:52pm

Use the UP button

If you read something that tickles your fancy. It's polite.

It is advisable not to drink while reading the blog. Many a monitor has been sprayed by tea/coffee/coke/single malt whisky in the past. Occasionally some posts are that good.

3
Beany | 9 February 2010 - 5:18pm

post

Just simply post, even if you don't think anyone will reply.

They'll at least read it.

1
badger_king | 9 February 2010 - 5:28pm

Always Go Way Over The Top...

... in complimenting Word staff about a new format to the magazine. It makes them really happy - and none of them seem to realise that the implication is that the previous format must have been really shit :).

2
Formbyman | 9 February 2010 - 5:45pm

Well done

That's a really well-worded and succinct comment, Formbyman. Very well done indeed.

1
Lying Doggo | 10 February 2010 - 12:51pm

Why?

Why would a change imply the previous format wasn't that good? Surely the nature of print media is that it's always evolving and improving? I know you hate the 'football supporter' sycophancy you see around here, but you are perhaps overstating this one.

0
PaddyH | 11 February 2010 - 12:21am

You obviously...

...couldn't see the tongue in my cheek.

0
Formbyman | 12 February 2010 - 8:00am

In all fairness to him

it was buried so far in that it had actually tunnelled back down your throat and come to rest in your œsophagus. :)

1
illuminatus | 12 February 2010 - 11:05am

Tell me anything

Write about anything you damn well want, from Punk to ornamental wooden hippos from Benin (of which there is one in this room at my eye-line at the moment).

Just be concise, witty and enthusiastic. There are some eloquent ladies and gentlemen here who make my day on a regular basis with turns of phrase you simply will not find anywhere else in cyberspace.

Make me laugh if you're in the mood. Make me think if you're not. Inform me anyway.

It's great here.

2
Beezer | 9 February 2010 - 5:49pm

Tell us what you LIKE, not what you hate

Posts which tell me about stuff other posters love are a million times more enjoyable and rewarding than negative ones.
e.g. I think it was John Waite who put me on to Sound Opinions from Chicago Public Radio and I have been revelling in its podcast ever since.
I'd rather have that than a load of bile about how much Bono is a helmet. All right, already

0
PaddyH | 11 February 2010 - 12:29am

We're not total pedants here...

... but txt spk & emoticons are 2 b avoided ;-(

I personelly try to keep my spelling and grammer good and make good use of the edit fasillity to remove typoos as well.

It's by no means compulsory but it does give the place a nice tone.

3
ganglesprocket | 9 February 2010 - 6:23pm

Personally speaking

I find the use of proper English quite refreshing. makes me feel like I'm talking to equals rather than gibbering morons who can't be arsed to write a few extra letters.

0
el toro calvo grande | 10 February 2010 - 9:15am

OMG PROPER LOLZ!!!!!!

Apologies... I'll grab someone's hoodie at knifepoint...

0
badger_king | 10 February 2010 - 2:44pm

Excuse me..

Shouldn't that be "omg propa lolz"?

u gots 2be propa pdantik bout tingz if u wantz 2 hang wiv da massive

2
Lenny Law | 10 February 2010 - 11:11pm

We're not total pedants here,

but there's not really any such thing as a typo any more - they are literals - a typo relates to a mistake made when compositing text for old presses.
Actually, just listen to ganglesprocket because I'm a cnut. Sorry that was a typoo.
Note: Emoticon here to denote irony please typesetter

2
PaddyH | 11 February 2010 - 12:09am

Friday night forgiveness

David Hepworth mentioned a while back that he gets up early on saturday morning to clean up all the broken glasses on the floor from the night before. Thanks David.
I think that Friday night posts should be given a little slack. I'm sure I'm not the only one who has woken on saturday and had a litttle shudder thinking 'oh why did i post that?' Sorry for mine but it's the end of a working week and some of us let our hair down a bit and drink the odd bevy or whatever floats our boat.
Friday night 80's disco night was great fun though!

0
Lunaman | 9 February 2010 - 6:40pm

you still have

hair to let down!?

0
James Blast | 9 February 2010 - 7:14pm

Luckily yes not that long though

Getting a bit grey round the edges for sure but not quite the mature looks of the Brentford folk as yet James.

0
Lunaman | 9 February 2010 - 7:52pm

In times of extant media overload

...examples being Led Zep at the O2, the last new Dylan/U2 album, the Beatles reissues and so on, think before starting the 25th thread on the same topic that week. The Word is pretty good at avoiding hyperbole, sometimes at times of high excitement the blog less so.

2
Auntie Beryl | 9 February 2010 - 7:38pm

I've deliberated and cogitated ...

Be tolerant as we do not all share the same perspective, beliefs, humour or idea of what is appropriate behaviour. Maybe it's best just to ignore some things.

No one's in charge here other than The Word.

Just follow the FAQs. They're the only rules you need. No other restrictions should apply, no matter what anyone says.

Develop a bit of a thick skin - i.e. best not to be too sensitive.

1
Sven Garlic | 9 February 2010 - 8:20pm

Be honest when doing the Randomiser

Often the less cool, the more interesting.

0
Pilleus Jr | 9 February 2010 - 8:28pm

Randomiser?

Now there's a good idea...

0
Red Umpire | 9 February 2010 - 9:12pm

NWOBHM is still available...

and Paul Beard will be upset by that fact.

Patrick Crowther is a top chap and shares my love of Supertramp and we also both live in Oxford(ish).

And threads on Kate Bush and pedantic views on our mother tongue will be read!

1
Uncle Wheaty | 9 February 2010 - 8:38pm

Awwwwww...

How sweet of you! What are you doing on Valentine's Day?!

It's funny spending a lot of time on this site... I find I start to feel genuinely fond of certain bloggers from the things they write about and the way they come across, despite never having met them. You're one of them Uncle. I've enjoyed your contributions a great deal and particularly the fact that you are proud to write of your love for Praying Mantis.

0
Patrick Crowther | 9 February 2010 - 8:47pm

Make a search of your chosen topic

... before starting a new thread. The self same subject may have been posted yesterday to which your added comments would doubtless be invaluable

1
Steerpike | 9 February 2010 - 9:22pm

Don't be so fawningly sycophantic

to posts by David Hepworth

11
chabsy | 9 February 2010 - 9:51pm

Sorry Chabsy..

..God, you're so great...let me give you a foot massage.

1
shane pacey | 9 February 2010 - 9:55pm

Listen to me..

..and bloody learn.

0
shane pacey | 9 February 2010 - 9:54pm

Politeness, tolerance and brevity

The three 'P-'...er, the 'P, T and B'.

0
Specs_Beard | 9 February 2010 - 11:08pm

Don't Say "We've Already Done This One"

Apologies if somebody's already done this comment...

1
Stephen G | 10 February 2010 - 12:47am

Up to a point

There are times when topics are re-visited - I think it is helpful to
provide the link to the earlier discussion, but just because there has been an earlier discussion doesn't make that the Final Word on any subject.

But I agree that baldly stating "we've already done this" is unhelpful

0
el hombre malo | 10 February 2010 - 9:45am

Fraser is the boss

Accept that Master Lewry should be listened to at all times, for verily he is the Kofi Annan of Development Hell.

0
torrential1 | 10 February 2010 - 2:33am

Indeed

He has the effortless authority of a popular teacher. Anyway, that's enough fawning sycophancy for now...

0
Spartacus Mills | 10 February 2010 - 8:49am

Yes

That's quite enough.

1
Fraser Lewry | 10 February 2010 - 8:55am

If you say so, Fraser

0
Gatz | 10 February 2010 - 9:19am

That's

Sir

0
Beany | 10 February 2010 - 9:53am

I see Fraser more as the local sheriff

Walking the streets, keeping law and order.
He has freely admits he has 30 Ed Kuepper cds, that alone makes him a man to be feared.

0
Cookieboy | 11 February 2010 - 8:56am

It's you're own time your wasting...

Yes, wrong spellings and misplaced apostrophes are irritating. Don't let it consume you.

0
skirky | 10 February 2010 - 10:37am

Choose a silly name

and don't worry because Fraser will let you change it to something less embarassing someday, maybe.

0
On The Fence | 10 February 2010 - 11:30am

Try not to make

grand sweeping gernalisations about a place you may have had a fortnight's fly-drive in and your company sent you to twice.

0
MyAmericanMate | 10 February 2010 - 11:33am

Aw, come on

If we didn't occasionally comment on the US, we wouldn't have the pleasure of your "You don't know 'cause YOU WEREN'T THERE, MAN!" replies.

1
Captain Underpants | 10 February 2010 - 1:22pm

True enough, Dav

although for some it's more "even if you were there, YOU WOULDN'T KNOW, MAN".

0
MyAmericanMate | 11 February 2010 - 5:24am

Word Blogs....help other bloggers please!

I`m a bit of a newcomer to all this but did pose a question last week to which no-one replied or even made up an answer and it`s a question thats been bugging me for years......someone "out there" must have a theory..

Why is the 10CC drummer Paul Burgess introduced on a live album as "the man responsible for the windscale disaster"?

Help me help me help me.....

0
johnsimpson1965 | 10 February 2010 - 1:41pm

Sounds to me...

...like a private joke.

0
Fraser Lewry | 10 February 2010 - 1:45pm

I've heard a similar reference to it

in, of all places, The Goon Show. Eccles is described as "The brains behind the Windscale Disaster" which was a fire in a nuclear reactor in Windscale (funny, that). It happened in the fifties, so it was a good topical joke for the Goons, I guess...

0
Sam Fiddian | 11 February 2010 - 5:35am

The man responsible for the windscale disaster

It could be couldn`t it? But I recall there is some laughter from the audience so could be a big private joke.
I`ll have to go and listen to it now.....oh, and it was Andy Peebles making the announcement.

0
johnsimpson1965 | 10 February 2010 - 2:06pm

1976 wasn't Year Zero

It was one of many year zeros, all of which co-incide with someones discovery of the music that speaks to them.

Noteable year zeros include 1956, 1962, 1966, 1976, 1988 and probably many more besides.

2
stimpy | 10 February 2010 - 5:00pm

Try to come up with

a more imaginative word for those common slang terms that seem to pepper most blogs. Y'know, the f-bomb, the c-word, ecky th*mp and the like.

Having said all that, my favourite censorship on this blog in the past has to be "f**uck". Still trying to fathom that one out.

0
Beany | 10 February 2010 - 7:30pm

Was that me...

... and another typoo error by any chance?

0
ganglesprocket | 10 February 2010 - 7:42pm

Genesis were

only any good with PG on the vocals, some say otherwise but they're meringue

*meringue means wrong

0
James Blast | 10 February 2010 - 7:38pm

You're not

meringue there James.

0
Doug B | 11 February 2010 - 11:56am

Pie

...I mean "Aye"

0
nicktf | 21 February 2010 - 9:38am

some people here rate the Daily Mail as a newspaper -

but then every internet forum has its nutjobs.

2
badartdog | 10 February 2010 - 10:37pm

I rate the Daily Mail

just not very highly, that's all.

Coat, etc.

1
illuminatus | 12 February 2010 - 12:00pm

Glastonbury is better here...

The best craic I had last year, online, was the Glastonbury weekend at the Word blog. Not to be missed.

3
PaddyH | 11 February 2010 - 12:31am

Bang to rights

I'm cringing reading all of these DONT'S and ticking off the ones I've done without realising it. Please forgive me!

0
Stephen Merrick | 11 February 2010 - 12:55am

Only God can give you forgiveness my son...

or failing that, Eric Clapton.

0
Patrick Crowther | 11 February 2010 - 11:08pm

This blog discriminates against poor mathematicians

You could write a brilliantly witty and erudite post, but your inability to perform simple sums will prevent you from posting.

1
Bigsby | 11 February 2010 - 10:36pm

if there is a north south divide

it would be of hemispheres

a number of times I have thought aboutputting pen to paper to object to various slights

references to bruce or sheila or crocodile dundee when a review is of an australian band, nay anything australian

one review, a few editions ago, suggested a band's retro style was because it took a long time for new music to reach australia

I didn't

but I have now

0
Junior Wells | 11 February 2010 - 11:36pm

You have to realize, Tony..

..that yer average Englishman's antipathy to Australia is born of jealousy.

0
shane pacey | 13 February 2010 - 3:50am

You may be able to clarify something for me

I'm Scottish. When we were in Australia (about 15 years ago), we were a little surprised to be called "Poms" while we were in Melbourne. This was done in a friendly way, not as a heated insult. I had previously regarded Poms as English - but my Australian friends told me that while they were vaguely aware of the epithet "Jock", they regarded Jocks as a subdivision of Poms.

Is this your understanding ? (Unlike some of my tribe, I do not strain every fibre of my being in loathing the English, so I wasn't that bothered, just curious.)

0
el hombre malo | 20 February 2010 - 9:45pm

Most Australians..

..aren't good at British Isles accents..I've often been called a Scot or an Irishman (I'n from Yorkshire)
Poms covers everyone, usually.

0
shane pacey | 21 February 2010 - 12:10am

We had explained that we were from Glasgow

But it didn't seem to make much difference - the view was that we were Poms. It was an inclusive thing - as long as they had a tag for us, that was fine. We had just never thought of ourselves as Poms, mainly because I'd mainly heard it in a cricketing context.

A great holiday, and a great place. In 3 weeks travelling (Cairns - Daintree - Alice Springs / Uluru - Sydney - Melbourne) we only met one asshole. (He was from Canberra) That's a fantastic hit-rate!

0
el hombre malo | 21 February 2010 - 12:51am

As a pom myself

were there not 'prisoners of her majesty' despatched to Oz from all over the UK, including Scotland, Wales, and NI, not just England ? Wiki reckons this isn't the etymology of the word pom, but since it doesn't even offer a reasonable guess at where it came from they can suck eggs.

0
Harold Holt | 21 February 2010 - 2:57am

Bit addictive, isn't it?

Probably the first thing many of us do after logging on to the internet is to check out this blog.

Let's keep it that way!

0
Declan | 20 February 2010 - 9:14pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd