Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

The Rolling Stone who is stony broke - Mick Taylor

el hombre malo's picture

Mick Taylor interviewed in The Mail On Sunday : The Rolling Stones stopped paying him in 1982 when they changed record labels.

So although he was in the band from the golden period from Let It Bleed, through Sticky Fingers, Exile on Main St, Goat's Head Soup and It's Only Rock & Roll, he doesn't get any money for it any more.

How can they get away with it ?

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1213013/The-Rolling-Ston...

2

Dunno

But I would guess it's very complicated.

0
David Hepworth | 13 September 2009 - 11:10am

Complicated.....

The amount of money going into the Stones camp, it's not like they have hundreds of ex members is it? They could donate without having any legal backfires surely??

0
Lunaman | 13 September 2009 - 6:51pm

It's only rock'nroll...

...but I feel sure he doesn't like it.

0
Colin H | 13 September 2009 - 11:13am

That has made me feel really sad...

That is no way for such a wonderful musician to have ended up.

If everyone who had bought a Stones album with him on gave him a quid he'd be sorted for life. A better man than me should start a fund.

0
Patrick Crowther | 13 September 2009 - 11:20am

The Stones are a business first, a group second.

Indeed, Ron Wood didn't become a full 'partner' until the 90s (or even later), so I imagine Taylor was just a session musician during his tenure and was paid accordingly.

0
Paolo Meccano | 13 September 2009 - 11:30am

I don't disagree that they are a business first

But the article says he was paid up to 82 - 6 years after he left. Since then nothing.

0
el hombre malo | 13 September 2009 - 11:42am

Apart from the obvious

suspects did any musician make any money out of rock and pop? Or does bad news just travel fastest?

0
Chris G | 13 September 2009 - 11:49am

Royalties

I'd have thought he was due at least a co-credit on Time Waits For No One as it's his guitar work that makes the song.

0
Carl Parker | 13 September 2009 - 12:12pm

"The Rolling Stones are ruthless people" shock

Not. Sometimes they hid behind Allen Klein but sometimes they don't bother.

Just ask Richard Ashcroft.

0
Doods | 13 September 2009 - 12:57pm

Rolling Stones Ltd

Sounds like they need a HR dept.

0
Lunaman | 13 September 2009 - 3:16pm

Aww

This remind me how I felt when I discovered Neil Innes didn't get any money from me buying all The Rutles stuff I had over the years.

Boo!!! to 'Sir' Mick Jughead!

0
DogFacedBoy | 13 September 2009 - 6:08pm

I'm tempted to say

that if he hadn't blown all the money he did get on drugs and pies he could afford a lawyer and an accountant to sort the issue.

If he signed some oppressive contract back in the day, and Jagger/Richards are being assholes then speak to a lawyer, not the Mail on Sunday, and refer that lawyer to the recently revised composer credits for 'Whiter Shade of Pale', and to Pete Best's pay out on the HIHJ's 'Anthology 1'.

Next!

0
Steven C | 13 September 2009 - 7:59pm

this just in

Mick Taylor Rubbishes Stones Story
16th September 2009

Mick Taylor has angrily rejected suggestions that he is poor and is planning to sue the Rolling Stones.

Speaking to the NME, Mick Taylor’s manager Jeff Allen revealed that not only is the story that appeared in the Mail On Sunday not true but that Mick still has a very good relationship with his former bandmates.

Allen tells the NME that the guitarist was “horrified” to read the report and that he had no plans to take legal action.

"He certainly didn't say that he was going to sue the Stones. Mick's got a very good relationship with the Stones," Allen explained.

"In fact, the last time we met up with them, him and Keith [Richards, guitarist] were like long-lost lovers – hugging each other and happy to see each other. When Mick was ill either six or eight weeks ago with some kind of chest complaint, Mick Jagger had his office phone up to see what was going on, and then he phoned up the hospital just to check on Mick because they were worried about him. So there's absolutely no animosity between Mick and the Stones."

And to drive a nail into the Mail On Sunday’s report, not only is Mick still friendly with the Stones but he is definitely not destitute.

"You can imagine the shock, horror and disbelief when that article came out in the Daily Mail. The emphasis of the article was that Mick was some kind of run-down, down-and-out tramp living in Suffolk. The reality is Mick's having the house done up," he said. "Mick is living in Holland at the moment with his girlfriend."

Mick Taylor is due to tour with the Mick Taylor Band later this year, with dates in Germany and France already scheduled and others to be announced.

(NME)

0
James Blast | 19 September 2009 - 3:00pm

Blimey! Knock me down with a feather etc.

A story in Britain's best selling has a few inaccuracies! Who would have thought it!

(See Flat Earth News for more revelations).

Well spotted Mr Blast.

0
soapdodger | 19 September 2009 - 3:38pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2010 Development Hell Ltd