Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

The name of artists under 30 you like?

BigJimBob's picture

There has been a lot of grumpiness about musicians today compared to [insert your favourite date here] and I am at fault as anyone else here. Even the artist that generally seem to be of interest herein are not exactly spring chickens - this was brought into focus when my 12 year old was talking to her friend in the back of my car. As I forced them (their phrase) to listen to some of my music, her friend said; "why do all dads like sad oldsters like Elbow?"

At this point this set me thinking: I like to think I have a wide range in music - Keith Jarret (did you here that Jo?) to MF Doom - but is there anyone under 30 that I like? Mmmm. I quite like what I have heard of Ed Sheeran (pathetic I know). I think I should like Adele - but I find her (metaphorically) too major chord for my liking.

Anyone got any recommendations?

0

The question has made me realise

that I don't know the ages or age group of most of the musicians that I like. I enjoy a lot of the stuff I hear on the radio, stuff my 13 yr old brings to the table and I guess most of them are under thirty, but they don't count as I don't own any songs nor would I go to see them live.
Popping into my head as I write this are the XX, so I'll have them for my list!
Bon Iver's Justin Vernon was 30 this year and Robin Pecknold of Fleet Foxes is even younger (both according to Wikipedia) but most of my collection was made by the over thirties.

0
Georgedivided | 26 October 2011 - 9:53am

How old is Burial?

He's probably about 28.

Or 4,000. Nothing inbetween.

0
Moose the Mooche | 26 October 2011 - 9:59am

Maybe it is

a question of not checking ages, as I have albums by both Bon Iver and Fleet Foxes. Not sure about Burial - always suspected he was older.

0
BigJimBob | 26 October 2011 - 10:02am

Anna Calvi

- her album is my fave this year, Blackout is the most played track in my iTunes even though I only got it in August of this year.
The Horrors are all under 30, I think and I even went to see them live a couple of weeks ago.
(It was very loud)

0
badartdog | 26 October 2011 - 3:35pm

Scrolling through my Spotify list, I found these two...


Emmy The Great is, er, great.


Au Revoir Simone - have made some really gorgeous records, too.

I am 41. Mostly I play 'old,' but good music is good music.

1
Adman | 26 October 2011 - 10:05am

Nope...

...can't think of a single one...

0
Colin H | 26 October 2011 - 10:05am

Zach Condon

The man behind Beirut is remarkably still only 25.

0
Sebastian Beach | 26 October 2011 - 10:08am

Thank christ for that!

I've got one then.

How old is Fionn Regan?

How old are Tunng?

If I can get three I can be happy and go back to listening to music by old, beardy, dead/nearly dead geezers.

0
Moose the Mooche | 26 October 2011 - 10:19am

The magnificent

Big Deal.

Miles Kane.

Girls Aloud.

Arctic Monkeys.

The Sand Band.

Devon Sproule.

Laura Marling.

1
Chimney Singing... | 26 October 2011 - 10:16am

Laura Marling

yeah, got it. Miles Kane ..haven't, etc

An observation : are Girls Aloud still under 30. Wow, they have been around for ages!

0
BigJimBob | 26 October 2011 - 10:23am

Have an up

for Miles Kane, add The Vaccines (just) and Two Door Cinema Club

0
Dave Amitri | 26 October 2011 - 8:21pm

Predictably....

...loads. Off the top of my head:

GaGa
James Blake
Nicola Roberts
Lykke Li
The Horrors
Rihanna
Laura Marling
Katy B
Janelle Monáe
Anna Calvi
Eliza Doolittle
Gemma Ray
Sugababes (although not for a while: I'll be interested to see if the original line-up gets back together and does something fun.)
Lauren O'Connell
Dan Deacon (he's 30)
Beyoncé (she's 30)

I suppose the only thing notable about that list is that it doesn't include any skinny boys with guitars.

0
Bob | 26 October 2011 - 10:28am

The Horrors

Are frighteningly skinny and definitely wield axes

1
Chimney Singing... | 26 October 2011 - 10:30am

Oops! True!

They're a bit of an exception, though!

0
Bob | 26 October 2011 - 10:41am

Respectfully...

a lot of these artists are not very much under thirty.

If you're a teenager the difference between someone who's 28 and someone who's 35 is pretty meaningless.

A better challenge would be "artists under 25".

And, in response to the OP, kids don't *want* you listening to their music, or music by/for people their age, no matter what they say. Do you remember that? I do.

0
Moose the Mooche | 26 October 2011 - 10:41am

I fully appreciate that

and I wouldn't want it any different. I just felt that the kids had a point. That said I do listen to a lot of stuff that has been mentioned, so maybe it's just a question of people here NOT worrying too much about age.

But your 25 challenge is quite right: tweenies/teenagers would still see most of the artists suggested here as oldsters product.

0
BigJimBob | 26 October 2011 - 1:12pm

Matthew Halsall

The brilliant Matthew Halsall, trumpet maestro of Manchester, is only 28.

0
duco01 | 26 October 2011 - 10:46am

My two most listened to albums

That were made in the last ten years have been Kings & Queens by Jamie T, 25 and Made Of Bricks by Kate Nash 24.

The Jamie T album sounds like Joe Strummer's solo work, The Clash, Big Audio Dynamite and Weller, with a large dose of hip hop mixed in.

Kate Nash got slagged at the time for being a Lily Allen copyist, but to my ears she sounds like she should be on Stiff Records circa 1979. There's more than a touch of Madness to her first album, musically and lyrically.

So...they might be 25 and under, but there's a certain amount of they could be from 1979 to their work!

0
SimonL | 26 October 2011 - 12:52pm

Nash

Yes! I hadn't quite made that leap, but you're spot on.

0
Alan Dente | 26 October 2011 - 9:07pm

the villages are i think all under 14??

and i think Michael Kiwananuka is in his early twenties

2
simontyler | 26 October 2011 - 10:53am

'The Villagers' is really just one bloke,

Conor O'Brien, he's seriously talented and yes, seems to be about 12 years old. His self-produced/performed album 'Becoming a Jackal' is a minor classic. He's recently given his band more license in arranging songs and it hasn't been such a good move. Elsewhere, The Arctic Monkeys are simply miles ahead of their contemporaries and the Young Knives continually delight. If Girls Aloud are all still under 30 I'd be happy to include them in the Pantheon as well.

0
Hippo | 26 October 2011 - 11:18am

I was about to write Villagers

but found you have beaten me to it so let me just agree whole heartedly.

0
daddyclark | 26 October 2011 - 3:14pm

Villagers

He/they were on the second stage at Cambridge this year. He expressed concern that we were very quiet for a festival crowd. I think he honestly didn't realise that the whole place was rapt. Very impressed.

0
thecheshirecat | 26 October 2011 - 11:41pm

Age Shoudln't Be An Issue

I'm in my mid fifties - I've assumed that a lot of the people I listen to are "young" or younger than me, at least.
Folk seems to be a fertile ground for producing some amazingly talented singers and musicians. I've seen several performers over the last year or so who are under or just over thirty. (I'm too lazy to look up their actual ages): Jackie Oates, Jonny Kearny & Lucy Farrell, The Unthanks, Jason Steel, Kris Drever; There is a lot of good new music being produced by young people.

Edit: I'm going to see Karine Polwart tonight in Market Harborough and Carrie Rodriguez on Friday in Buckingham. Both are in their thiries, both were in their twenties when I first saw them.

0
wayfarer | 26 October 2011 - 11:00am

It shouldn't, definitely.

It isn't, I don't think, for most people. But I think there are a reasonable, though not majority, contingent of the Massive for whom anything by younger artists who aren't consciously playing "some old" is a bit suspect.

0
Bob | 26 October 2011 - 11:06am

Good Point

I probably fall right into that category - I'm very concious of the fact that the above mentioned performers are normally the youngest people in the venue on the night by some way. I wonder how that makes them feel?

0
wayfarer | 26 October 2011 - 11:24am

Karine Polwart

Saw her a couple of years ago and was hugely impressed. Something endearingly quirky about her.

0
ianess | 27 October 2011 - 11:48pm

Damn.

I was going to say Miu Sakamoto but she is an elderly 31. The daughter of musicians Ryuichi Sakamoto and Akiko Yano, I have downloads of most of recordings. The song Child Of Snow below was released when she was 19 and is based on a piece composed by her old man. I've just learned she is to be the voice of the new Japanese Vocaloid software named Mew.

If I can't have Miu then I shall plump for Connie Talbot from Britain's Got Talent.

1
Beany | 26 October 2011 - 11:10am

Made when in their 20s

Every note recorded by the Beatles was played by a person in their twenties, same generally goes for the "classic period" of most bands in my experience. Does that count? I do like lots of bands/ artists who are in their 20s, but if they're still together and producing quality stuff into their 30s and above; that's when I'll start to love them. Not many do though; there's always a cull

0
The Muswell Hil... | 26 October 2011 - 12:47pm

George Harrison was only 19

when "Please Please Me" was recorded.
(Harrison born 25 Feb 1943. Please Please Me Recorded 11 Sept and 26 Nov 1962, and 11 and 20 Feb 1963).

0
duco01 | 26 October 2011 - 1:09pm

George H

Didn't they celebrate his 20th birthday after they'd cracked America?

0
ianess | 27 October 2011 - 11:50pm

Jimi Hendrix

Does that count?

Seriously...

Most of Bob's list above
Miles Kane
Arctic Monkeys
Dry the River
Emmy the Great
Tame Impala (who are at most 12)

etc...

0
Paul Waring | 26 October 2011 - 12:49pm

Elbow

Regarding Elbow, is it that they're old, or is it that they 'sound' old? Elbow have always sounded a bit worn out and tired, even when they're big and belting.

Whereas music from the past that was being bought by youngsters but being made by older folks:

Blondie (Debbie Harry was in her 30s when Heart Of Glass was a single); Pulp (Jarvis was also in his 30s when Common People was out); Oasis (Noel was nearly 30, although Liam was a lot younger); The Police (two members around 30 when Message In A Bottle was out, one other nearly 40!).

Punk made it an issue about musicians being older, but it's not always the case that music consumed by a teenager is actually made by youngsters.

0
SimonL | 26 October 2011 - 12:50pm

Debbie Harry

Incidentally, Debbie Harry is only 3 years younger than Paul McCartney....

0
SimonL | 26 October 2011 - 2:14pm

Quite a few

Lykke Li
Hello Saferide
Professor Green
Katy Perry
Noah & the Whale
La Roux
DEV
Lissie
The Vaccines
Ariel Pink
Cults
Yuck
Beach House
husky Rescue

2
Mr Fade | 26 October 2011 - 1:00pm

Beach House!

How could I forget? Also Beirut. Also Best Coast. All the Bs.

1
Bob | 26 October 2011 - 1:08pm

Only the old die young

What a strange post! Why on Earth should age matter? If I like something I don't check the arist's age before I download it!

My recent/current stuff includes Glen Campbell, Doris Day, Josh Rouse, David Mead, the Pierces and the Secret Sisters. I would hazard a guess that the last two are under 30 and, generally I'd think most artists I like are over 30 ,but I never give it any thought!

0
daff | 26 October 2011 - 1:31pm

Here are some on my ipod

Arctic Monkeys
Devon Sproule
The Vaccines
Slow Club
Caitlin Rose
The Voluntary Butler Scheme

I'm going to guess that fun. are also under 30 so should be on my list but I had to look all the above up as I didn't know (or previously care, how old they all are)

0
JohnW | 26 October 2011 - 1:32pm

Lady GaGa..

a bit OTT obviously but knows how to construct a decent pop song, so that's her sorted. Well under 30 I would imagine.

0
Declan | 26 October 2011 - 2:01pm

She's 25.

Which, given that in "Just Dance", "Poker Face" and "Bad Romance" she's written and performed the three greatest songs of the 21st century so far, is pretty amazing.

By the way, the above is a simple fact. There's no point in anyone arguing. ;-)

2
Bob | 26 October 2011 - 2:07pm

No argument here!

No argument here! She's an amazing songwriter, all right.

0
burncoat | 26 October 2011 - 2:37pm

New Orleans

Being my favourite musical bag, I know of quite a few from that very fertile musical ground.

Trombone Shorty is about 24 and has been a pro muso for 15 years. Glen David Andrews is his cousin and is possibly even better than Shorty.

1
Jorrox | 26 October 2011 - 2:10pm

My young favorites have gotten old

I've been trying (and failing) to think of under-30 artists I truly like. At first I thought of Bon Iver, Fiona Appel, and Robyn but it turns out they're all over 30. I was going to say The National but it turns out the lead singer is 40. All of my once young favorites have somehow gotten old.

All I'm left with is: Janelle Monae, MGMT, and Amy Winehouse (who'll always be under 30). I did like some of Gaga's and Adele's songs but now that they're played to death every time I turn on the car radio I'm feeling done with both of them. And Gaga's new album is weak.

The over-30 oldies seem to be getting most of the attention in the music press too these days (Noel Gallagher, Waits, Radiohead, Coldplay, etc. etc.). Maybe they're crowding out the newcomers?

0
Lott | 26 October 2011 - 2:13pm

Gaga's new one.

About half of it is pretty weak, I'm afraid to have to admit. I wanted to love it so badly, but it's really only OK. But the bits that are good are better than almost anything else around.

0
Bob | 26 October 2011 - 2:17pm

Quite a letdown

Some good tracks here and there I agree but overall it was quite a letdown for me. None of it is as good as Bad Romance or Paparazzi etc. And it's partly her fault for overhyping it: When you go around announcing that your next album is going to be the album of the decade, you should probably have the goods to back it up.

0
Lott | 26 October 2011 - 2:28pm

I was a Gaga fan

but with that You & I song she's managed to record a song I intensely dislike. Coming after the Meh/Ace of Base -ness of Alejandro,Judas,Telephone, Born This Way...well, let's just say she's made more average stuff than amazing stuff. It's all starting to look a little tired. Doubt she's bothered mind as she's set for life. Bad Romance and the early singles are still splendid.

0
Mr Fade | 26 October 2011 - 5:06pm

Your 12-year-old's question...

...might be more about the 'sad' bit than the 'oldster' bit. I'm with the other posters who haven't got much of a clue about artists' ages but I'm sure a lot of stuff made by the over-30s crowd doesn't at all fall into the melancholic category.

Some favourite bouncy Oldsters (and I'm guessing at age here, obviously):
Quantic
Gogol Bordello
Battles
Chilly Gonzales
Bonobo (OK, it's a little wistful at times)
Mr Scruff
DJ Shadow
Death in Vegas
LCD Soundsystem (?)
Orkestra del Sol (...actually they are probably about 17)

Equally, it would be stupid to suggest that music made by The Young must be 'happy'.

But to answer her whole question - why do all dads listen to sad oldsters? - using a line from Tibor Fischer, it's because life's been kicking the shit out of us for 40 years.

0
murrance | 26 October 2011 - 2:34pm

I think the use of SAD

was modern youngsters' argot for anything that is Shit.

0
BigJimBob | 26 October 2011 - 2:51pm

Aaah.

Yes that's really shown me up to be an old codger. Shamefully, I think it was my generation that started to use the term.

0
murrance | 26 October 2011 - 3:01pm

Age

Most of the artists I like were under 30 when they did their best work. Current favorite is Laura Marling, also Emmy The Great seems young and is doing good work. There's a gospel artist called Josh Garrells who makes great music, would guess he's young. Don't really know ages of most artists.

0
Alan Dente | 26 October 2011 - 3:47pm

No one even mentioning the mighty Mumfords then?

I'm shocked. I quite like them...

0
ganglesprocket | 26 October 2011 - 3:54pm

My Dad is eighty

and when we watched an old clip of the Sex Pistols on TV recently, he remarked, "They were actually quite good, really."

3
Zanti Misfit | 26 October 2011 - 4:06pm

Pogo

Aka Nick Bertke, the 23 year-old Australian electronics whizz behind this, and others like it. I'd call it a Mash-up, but it's more of an 'implosion' really. Of all his stuff, I find this one particularly beautiful.

2
Stick | 26 October 2011 - 4:17pm

Age? Don't Know

Don't really know the ages of most of the new(ish) acts I like; but certainly Adele and Laura Marling. I am, however, rather surprised at the acts mentioned by some Word readers e.g. Sugarbabes, Beyonce, Katy Perry,Rihanna - but each to their own!!

0
wezz | 26 October 2011 - 5:32pm

Don't worry.

Those of us responsible are relatively small in number, so the Massive's realmusic:pretendmusic ratio remains reassuringly high.

2
Bob | 26 October 2011 - 6:38pm

Katy Perry pops out some

marvellous singles. Laura Marling seems to be on a 'letspretendI'mJoniMitchell' vibe with little to say. I'm suspicious of her.

0
Mr Fade | 26 October 2011 - 7:20pm

I'm really glad someone else feels that way.

I could only enjoy her 'Later...' performances by shutting my eyes because her face was totally emotionless. Like the ghost of an owl.

2
murrance | 28 October 2011 - 9:22am

Ghost of an Owl

...TMFTL, I'm afraid.

0
Moose the Mooche | 28 October 2011 - 9:26am

Ignore the slightly "wacky" name

We Were Promised Jetpackss were the first band that came to mind when I saw the question

0
sjp808 | 26 October 2011 - 5:44pm

Scrolling through the Ipod in my head

Arctic Monkeys
Lykke Li
Laura Marling
Rihanna
Girls Aloud
The Saturdays
Best Coast
Vampire Weekend
Frank Turner
Eliza Doolittle
Everything Everything
Florence and the Machine
Marina and the Diamonds
Goldheart Assembly
Frightened Rabbitt
Local Natives
Hot Club De Paris
Tinieh Tempah
Jamie T
Janelle Monae
Little Boots
My Latest Novel
Two Door Cinema Club

etc

*Some may be slightly older than 30. I'm guessing their ages.

Of course it helps that I'm still five years away from the big three zero milestone myself.

0
Tom | 26 October 2011 - 6:09pm

That's cheating.

If you were 25 and were listening to music made exclusively by the over 30s you'd have to be some sort of pervert, surely....?

1
Moose the Mooche | 26 October 2011 - 6:44pm

Sorry Grandad

Sir

0
Tom | 27 October 2011 - 1:11am

[gesturing with pipe] Quite right young feller.

Now go and find your own thread on, I don't know, skateboards or something.

1
Moose the Mooche | 27 October 2011 - 9:11am

Quite right too

he comes on here flaunting his youth, now where are my slippers? :)

0
daddyclark | 27 October 2011 - 3:56pm

The Ipod in Your Head

Anything like the Windmills of Your Mind?

0
wayfarer | 27 October 2011 - 10:11am

The Rifles and The Crookes

both under 30. The former finally made it in/on to The Word; the latter deserve to be massive - I went to see them last week with my 16 year old daughter so age doesn't always divide things (although she was embarrassed, obviously).

0
Peter E | 26 October 2011 - 6:39pm

Saw The Crookes play a live gig

in the street outside Record Collector, Sheffield on Record Store day this year. They are good - surprised there hasn't been even more of a buzz around them.

0
BigJimBob | 26 October 2011 - 7:15pm

Saw them at Tramlines

They were good - like something between the Housemartins and the Smiths.

0
Mr Sparks | 30 October 2011 - 7:17pm

When you're young

Haven't the majority of the best pop/rock records been made by under 30s? The thirties seem to be when it all starts turning bad - usually. Something about the attitude, energy, getting away with wild dress sense/hairsyles/behaviour, subject matter of songs etc. that suits <30 best. Hence we need the young blood. Anyway Anna Calvi, The Horrors, a bit of Rhianna, Gaga re musique de nos jours I am thinking.

0
Sven Garlic | 26 October 2011 - 7:06pm

Sven that is

wy I asked the question. For example, The Beatles were over by the time they were 30. Ergo, the under-thirties of today surely must be producing their best music now?

0
BigJimBob | 26 October 2011 - 7:17pm

Yeah

I am sure they are. But they're all rather overshadowed by the past in a way that didn't used to be the case. Is there a scene of now? Doesn't seem to be the same focus on certain key performers perhaps. The impact of it all is somehow less. I guess the Arctic Monkeys were the last lot to cause a big stir. Gaga's faded a bit. Not sure what's new young and big now.

0
Sven Garlic | 26 October 2011 - 9:00pm

To quote Weller

'The kids know where it's at'

0
Tom | 27 October 2011 - 1:13am

60s stars

Dylan - Blonde on Blonde before 25; Brian W - Pet Sounds before 25. George Harrison - Revolver by 23.

0
ianess | 27 October 2011 - 11:58pm

How come

Nobody's mentioned Julia Johnson yet?? Oh, ok then...

0
Rosbif | 26 October 2011 - 7:11pm

65 days of static

As I understand it, not an overly popular band around these parts.

I quite like them, they fill up the gaps between Mogwai albums and their reimagined 'soundtrack' to Silent Running is suprisingly affective.

0
James EB | 26 October 2011 - 8:17pm

Kasabian

is Pete Doherty still under 30?

The Rifles
Tinie Tempah
Vampire Weekend

0
Six Dog | 27 October 2011 - 9:41am

Doherty is 32

and his lost teenage waif persona is becoming increasingly untenable.

0
Slick | 2 November 2011 - 2:44am

The DuPree sisters

Collectively known as Eisley

1
roryks | 28 October 2011 - 7:50am

A few

Laura Marling/Noah & The Whale/Mumford & Sons/Bombay Bicycle Club/Arctic Monkeys/Vampire Weekend

probably some more too, but unsure of their ages!

0
Mr Sparks | 30 October 2011 - 7:21pm

These New Puritans

Look about twelve and are absurdly talented.

0
Futurenoir | 2 November 2011 - 9:00am

Bob Dylan

he's forever young.

As is Neil.

0
Slick | 2 November 2011 - 1:44pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd