Entertainment For Lively Minds
The Moment a Band Lost You
Have you ever loved an act deeply, bought their records, defended them to your friends, learned how to sing the harmonies on their records and then.....
Something bad happened. Suddenly you fell out of love and into reality.
I had one the other night with my previously beloved Teenage Fanclub. The Wickerman Festival in Dumfrieshire on Friday. They were so "meh" it was unbeleiveble. Just dull beyond belief, alright song after alright song and just no oomph whatsoever. I feel like the scales have fallen from my eyes and I can no longer understand what I saw in them in the first place.
Has anyone else had this experience? A sudden shattering realisation that a band you previously idolised isnt actually all that great?
Please help me in my mourning.
- More from goatboyuk69.
- Login or register to post comments









Surprised to hear that
Surprised to hear that goatboy ... the new album is their best for a while, I think, and looking forward to seeing them live.
How was the Wickerman festival otherwise?
I've never been a huge fan
but went along to the Manchester show with friends who were thrilled to bits with the performance.
What I did find, as an innocent bystander, was that not unsurprisingly, they had moved toward the more pipe-n-slippers/cosier aspect of their sound (which had always been there). Consequently I found it was all just a bit too polite and a bit too bloomin "nice" for my liking. When they did 'rock out' a bit, it was tempered somewhat, as if there were some babies asleep in the audience.. probably were actually. It was good and the new songs were very pretty but I still hanker after something a bit more vital and...relevant. It was like visiting an old friend and realising you have nothing in common any more.
A more serious let down for me was the last couple of New Order shows I saw before the split which were lacklustre at best. I was a massive fan as a teenager.
NO have always been famously inconsistent, but usually because they were off their faces, playing a set decided half an hour before the gig, playing unrehearsed new songs, or all of the above. The last couple of times they were playing the same set every night, and clearly going through the motions. We'd have welcomed an on-stage strop or a sequencer breakdown...a malfunction..anything to add some spontaneity.
They lost their magic when Gillian Gilbert left. By her own admission she was not the greatest guitarist and a two-finger keyboard prodder at best. However, she took with her the slightly amateurish charm and a welcome feminine touch which was so integral to the appeal of what would otherwise be a rather laddish band. Worse, she was replaced by a session blokey who did all sorts of unnecessary fancy trills on the guitar (criminal, especially on Joy Division songs), and played the keyboards with *two hands*. Wrong wrong wrong.
They will be back, and of course I'll go and see them.
Couldn't agree more...
...During their imperial phase (PCL to Technique), they were often a bit "inconsistent" live, but were still the best band in the world. New Order at Birmingham Tower Ballroom 1986, still the best gig I've ever been at.
Good call...
...I was there too. Started with Sooner Than You Think if my memory serves me well!
Collaborations
I said somewhere else on here before that the moment New Order lost it for me wasn't so much when they brought the "session blokey" (Phil Cunningham) in, but when they started doing collaborations, at around the same time.
There were two on the poor Get Ready album: one with Bobby Gillespie and another with (*shudder*) Billy Corgan. Despite that I stuck with them for Waiting For The Sirens' Call, to find another terrible joint effort with Ana Matronic from Scissor Sisters hanging around stinking up an already pretty poor album, title track aside.
Despite all that, if (when?) they do reform I'm sure I'll buy the new album on the day of release...
Tiger Suit
I know it's not even out yet but I'm distinctly unimpressed by the songs from KT Tunstall's new album, I've Still Got A Loop Pedal (And I'm Gonna Use It With Synths). After exhausting most of her pre-record deal material on her previous three albums is this KT's Difficult Fourth Album? It might have been recorded at the famous Hansa Studios but frankly, I wouldn't care if it had been done at Abbey Road or in her bathroom.
Lambchop
First saw them in 2000 at the Royal Festival Hall and was blown away by the texture, originality and sheer beauty of the music, the humility and humanity of Kurt Wagner and the inclusiveness and friendliness of the crowd.
Saw them several times thereafter including a couple of Kurt's solo shows and every time a little bit of the sheen had gone until the performances were dominated by Mark Nevers lounge jazz piano and the gradual stripping down of the once lush sound. Kurt Wagner lost the previous awe he once exhibited and appeared to be a bit aloof and "rock star".
I still buy their albums, probably out out of loyalty than anything, but they are no longer in the top ten, it's difficult to pinpoint the exact moment, more of just a drifting apart.
Lost 'em after Damaged. It
Lost 'em after Damaged. It was just boring. (Sorry Kurt!)
Are we asking too much?
99.9% of acts make their best music early on in their career. They then repeat themselves, break up and reform at the point their fans are beginning to miss them. The reformed act are usually more polished but less inspired. At the same time the audience are older and wiser. It can never be the way it was before.
F. Scott Fitzgerald
F. Scott Fitzgerald put it best' "There are all kinds of love in this world, but never the same love twice." He was refering to The Jesus And Mary Chain reforming, I believe.
To a degree David
But my love for the music Elvis Costello has endured (North apart), Leonard Cohen and all things Squeeze to name but 3.
your thesis
I agree-name me a band who've been brill for more than 5-6 years, allowing for maybe a single turkey along the way? Hard innit? OK I'll hazard a few-Led Zep, REM, the Fabs. Not too many others I reckon, although there are sycophants who follow every one of their band's releases with equal adoration. I know you loathe The Fall but anyone who claims that their output of the past decade comes close to the dazzling first quartet has been drinking paint.
My three suggestions
Sparks, XTC & Fountains of Wayne all immediately come to mind. A combined active age of about 75 with only rare lapses in quality.
Johnny Cash
is surely the master of a late flourish!!
How about
Half Man Half Biscuit?
Seriously.
Brill for more than six years
I agree. Very few bands in the pop/rock sphere manage to be magic for more than 5-6 years.
But it's easy to think of jazz artists who've been brilliant for that length of time and much longer: Miles, Trane, Monk, Mingus, Charlie Haden, John Surman, Keith Jarrett - maybe even Lee Morgan.
Rod Stewart
Do you think I'm Sexy - No - now get thee behind me.
Good one... Up until Atlantic Crossing he could do no wrong
Post-Atlantic Crossing he could do very little right
Film
It happened for me with David Lynch. I walked out of Lost Highway swearing that he'd never get another penny from me. My wife persuaded me to watch his next film, The Straight Story, and it turns out it was one of the best things he'd ever done. He's not made another film since that I'm interested in seeing, mind.
Same Here
I agree completely, David Lynch used to be unmissable, and then I just kind of couldn't be arsed after Lost Highway. I actually have a Lynch film from Lovefilm, that I can't even remember the title of, and I've had it sitting on the mantlepiece waiting to be watched for about 3 months, that's how interested I am!
Teenage Fanclub
It pains me to say it, but I kind of agree with goatboyuk above. I've seen Teenage Fanclub live at least once (often 4 or 5 times) a year since 1990. They are my favourite band on the planet, can do no wrong and continually release tip-top albums to lttle fanfare or celebration beyond the walls of their own very staunch and supportive fanbase. When they played Glasgow a month or so ago I left feeling it was my least favourite TFC show ever, for the same reasons mentioned above - cosy, relaxed, 'nice' rocking out etc etc. I was a bit deflated and disappointed. Funnily enough though, the last time I'd seen them before this was in Motherwell about a year ago, when they debuted some of the new album, and they were fucking brilliant!TFC might have evolved into niceness and predictability as they've got older (a bit like their fanbase) but don't give up on them just yet.
I saw Teenage Fanclub at
I saw Teenage Fanclub at Truck on Sunday, about the seventh or eightth time I’ve seen them, and thought they were just tremendous. The bucolic setting, balmy summer evening and adoring blissed out audience probably helped their mood, but they seemed totally into it. It’s true that it’s been a long time since they were edgy. The thing with TFC is what you see - middle-aged family guys who love guitar music and sweet harmonies - is what you get, for them to contrive anything other than that would be just ridiculous.
Simple Minds
The Ballad Of The Streets ep, the Street Fighting Years album, the subsequent tour.
I loved that band. Defended them vociferously against the plebs at my school who thought U2 were better. Even though I was well aware that Live In The City Of Light was dodgy, my considered opinion was that, on the evidence of the only other live album I had ever heard at the time (U2's crappy Under A Blood Red Sky) live albums didn't count.
But oh my God. Belfast Child. A song so dreary it makes Mull Of Kintyre sound like Born Slippy. Never mind! I cried, the album will be good. It wasn't. Who cares! I cried, they will be great live. They weren't. The gig was around two and half hours long, with epic noodling and a Jesus Christ pose from Jim Kerr every two minutes.
For many years it was all heavy metal round my way I was so traumatized.
Ha!
A song so dreary it makes Mull Of Kintyre sound like Born Slippy. Absolutely brilliant.
In defence of SFY......
It has Lou Reed "rapping" on This Is Your Land....
That is the only defence. Biko. Oh dear Jim. What were you thinking.
Live In The City of Light - liked the medley of Sun City/Love Song etc.....
Bombast and self importance will come back into fashion one day.
I can't think of another band who I loved so much
and then absolutely couldn't stand, and it all happened so quickly.
I Travel, The American, Love Song ... brilliant. Barrowlands gig, 83-ish I think, fantastic.
And then what happened? I blame that hit single they had in the States. It was all downhill from there.
I think it was when they decided to become
U3 around the time of "Once Upon A Time".
A mate of mine
who was a BIG SM fan said that it all went wrong on Sparkle In The Rain. The opening chords of Waterfront were a death knell. I kind of agree, at that point they went all "stadium", which was a shame as I though the early stuff up to New Gold Dream was great.
Once upon a mind
Indeed, once a huge fan, now never admit it to anyone. Belfast Child was the turning point for me, as an All About Eve fan, I found it embarrassing that both support and headline act on the Street Fighting Years (or whatver) tour were basically playing the same folk song and claiming it as their own. Couldn't really reconcile after that. Having said that, SM at Wembley Stadium 1988ish was probably one of my most desperately anticipated gigs, having missed the legendary Milton Keynes bowl gig. I suffered Texas and Gun pretty much on the front row during the support slots, only for my mate to faint the moment Simple Minds started. I had to sit at the side in the stands nursing him after that, and was really quite uncharitable about it. But I suppose it just shows he had better taste than me at the time.
Thick Minds
Simple minds - self satisfied, commercial, management driven twaddle. Why no-one seemed to realise this at the time, was beyond me. There's a reason no-one plays Simple Minds any more. Because it sounds like what it is - fake, pompous music.
"For many years it was all heavy metal round my way I was so traumatized." Well glad to hear you grew up then.
I'm detecting a certain aggression in your last line.
Let me make it clear I was about ten when I got into Simple Minds. They didn't record the first single I ever bought but they were the first band I loved. This meant they were they first band to turn crap on me, when I was about 13. Because I was so young, this was a big deal at the time, while obviously not a big deal in the larger scheme of things. Which I am hoping my post conveyed. There's no need to get snippy on me.
I Have To Say
I still love the song "Street Fighting Years", I'm not crazy about the rest of the album mind. "New Gold Dream" remains great.
.
you don't like Simple Minds, fair enough. But to refer to their music as fake is a bit much considering Jim and Charlie have been at it for over 30 years, if it was fake then i'm sure they'd have retired with their cash around 1987.
The bad rep they get is laughable against some other critics darlings - for sons and fascination, new gold dream and sparkle in the rain alone they deserve utmost respect.
Fake is always
one of the words people are going for with music they don´t like or appreciate.
- Ola, what do you think about Sex Pistols?
- Fake!
See?
ok
Yeah fair enough observation. I guess when we have a real dislike of some aspect of the personality of music - its easy to assume that it sounds contrived. I guess fake or contrived means that you assume there have been decisions made which are dishonest and commercial, rather than coming from a more genuine place.
An album of three halves
So it's just me then... I hate the clattering 80s bluster rock of Once Upon a Time. Street Fighting Years is always lumped along with 'Once...', but I contend it is a rather more complex beast.
Sure, it is an album that they have overstuffed with sonic twists and turns (like fellow 1989 sonic casualty Seeds of Love - remember that?), but at least they are trying to add a little bit of depth rather than extra layers of ear-bleeding bluster. A significant portion of the album is pleasingly dense and rather introverted (Title track, Soul Crying Out, This is Your Land and Let it All Come Down - these are not stadium anthems). And face it Mandela Day *isn't* the embarrassment that a late 80s SM song written at the last minute for a Mandela benefit ought to be - I mean it's got a nice tune and all!
And the album stiffed after purchasers quickly realised how little it resembled the awful Belfast Child - surely a good sign...
But Biko... why?!
Because
because, Biro
sorry, the drink made me do it
Primal Scream
Without a doubt one of my favourite groups throughout the 90s - Screamadelica was the obvious high point but I really enjoyed the preceding two albums and I never really understood the criticism of Give Out But Don't Give Up which still regularly gets an outing on the Monty stereo.
Things started to go awry with Vanishing Point which came across like Screamadelica with the E replaced by smack. Some of it was fascinating but some was just too dark to be enjoyable. Then came XTRMTR and some other unlistenable garbage which I bought but mentally glossed over when flicking through the cds.
The final straw was Glastonbury 2004 - the one with the floods. Primal Scream were second on the bill on the Pyramid stage. The day had been sunny - finally! - and I thought they would be a great way of rounding off the weekend. Shambolic doesn't do the dismal performance I saw justice. I lasted 5 songs before heading off to the car-park; my once favourite live act now leading me to end the festival early in a somewhat less buoyant mood. I heard later that the only way to get a ranting Gillespie off stage was to turn the power off completely. A sad day indeed...
It's all about opinions but
Vanishing point and Xtrmtr are Primal Screams best two albums. And are up thier with the very best albums of the 90's. The tours for these albums were some of the best rock 'n' roll shows i've ever witnessed. Including the Glastonbuty show.
The following albums were shite though.
Wholeheartedly agree
The Hammersmith Palais show around XTRMTR was one of the best I've seen, as was the headlining performance on the Other Stage Glastonbury in '03 (not the one mentioned above).
Really?
Well, like you say it's down to personal taste. Vanishing Point had its moments but I really struggled with XTRMNTR. I never saw them live during this period though, so have no idea what that was like.
If you enjoyed the Glasto performance that year then... well, I've genuinely got no idea why, but I'm happy somebody got something out of it. Perhaps it was more of a disappointment because I was excited about seeing them, perhaps I was also dragged down by my friends (including some long-standing PS fans) who were clearly not enjoying it. But to me it sounded like a howl of drug-addled desperation, not a second-on-the-bill tour de rock'n'roll. Didn't they end up slagging off Kylie as well? Not normally a problem, but she had just undergone a cancer-scare, so not the most diplomatic of moves...
I'd be very interested to hear why you liked them so much around this time, anyway...
Give Out
I actually prefer the Scream's more head down Faces/Stones pastiches than Vanishing Point and Screamadelica. Some great tunes on there - Jailbird and Country Girl are just fantastic songs.
Personally, I'd go with 'Give Out' as the best PS album
with Screamdelica second. The rest seems a dirge.
XTRMNTR
is the album that go me back into PS after a while away as I danced like a twat when they played Reading in 2000
plus the vowelless title helps me out when I'm playing along with the final roungd of BBC4 posh quiz 'Only Connect'
Saw that tour in Sheffield
It remains to this day the loudest noise I have ever heard.
Diminishing returns
XTerminator onwards: Evil Heat, Riot,. Their albums were bought and played little. Beautiful Future was the nadeer and may well have ceased my love affair with the Scream. Awful tunes with even worse lyrics all wrapped up in a pseudo poppy production.
I'm going to the Screamadelica concerts with a sense of foreboding with the hope that I'll become a born again fan....but these run throughs of classic albums do seem like desperate throws of the dice for ageing rockers. I can't believe the artists ever do them with any great enthusiasm.
Faces/Stones
Couldn't agree more. Dolls, Rocks, great songs, better than anything the Stones have done for decades.
I did rate the last album too, by the way, much poppier than anything else they've done. Loved this track, Glory of Love:
*sits back and waits for Carty to spot this thread*
...get it out of your system Pat...
You asked for it
sigh, the appeal of Primal Scream to normally sensible people has always escaped me. I've never met him, nor do I wish to, but Gillespie comes across, to me at least, as an awful ejit. He reminds me of the guy you used to meet in college who was constantly trying to out cool everyone else with the records he had (hmmm, perhaps that was me). Every interview includes the same old tired cliches about rawk n roll (insert name of cult act here - Flying Burrito Brothers/MC5/Neu/blah, blah, blah), he records with the likes of (genetically fortunate but hardly god's gift to music) Kate Moss, every record I've heard by them has been a pale reflection of a classic that we all already own. I've said it before, I'll say it again, just because you have a great record collection does not mean you make great records.
Rant over (but they really are shite)
Spot on Mr Carty
It's that whole if I've got the right look, say the right thing, hang out with the right people in the right kind of places it'll be, like, really right, yeah?
No. All wrong.
I Might Add
that I have seen them live, the Electric Picnic a few years back, and that was shite and all. Throwing all the shapes and poses that everyone else got out of their system with their first band when they were teenagers. The absolute nadir of rock, even the likes of Westlife aren't as fake as this lot. Gillespie, I do not like you.
I have to say
Carty will never lose me with his spot on take on Primal Scream.
One brilliant album with songs remixed by other people and the rest are photocopies of photocopies of critically lauded albums which I'm not convinced were not that good on the first place - Iggy, Stones et al.
It's all about context
I was vaguely aware of Primal Scream but didn't really fall in love with them until Screamadelica came along. As an 18 year old who wasn't too familiar with the dance scene and didn't fancy trying E, it was a revelation: I suddenly got it, all of it. Yes I guess it was effectively a remix album, but what a set of remixes; and live it was stupendous - nothing could beat the mix of rock posturing and rave rapture. And if you didn't like the remix, there was always 'I'm losing More Than I'll Ever Have', the original Loaded, which is still one of my favourite songs today.
Give Out... knocked me out because it was so different from anything that had gone before. Scream-wise that is: obviously there were clear 'influences', but that didn't matter when the songs were this funky. Again, live, they managed to make it and Screamadelica all fit together in a way that made sense. I didn't care that they looked or sounded like the Stones or whoever; in fact I loved the fact that Bobby was 'doing' Mick.
Where they lost me was when everything they did - everything - suddenly became dark, skuzzy and smacked up. Maybe it was a new sound, maybe they were finally being original, but they didn't have the joy I once associated with them.
...
I don't think any band has endured such a honeymoon period of extended critical adulation on such a flimsy reheated pretext as Primal Scream. After all, isn't their only great album, Screamadelica, 21 years old and soon to get the keys to the house? It can't be far off it.
"isn't their only great album, Screamadelica"
No but thanks for playing
And don't get me wrong
I have tried to perservere with PS, I have Give Out, Vanishing Point and XTRMNTR, but under no circumstances could they defined as great albums. Some excellent tracks scattered across the three.
My point is that the Primal Scream premise is wafer thin homage to their classic influences, only once did they stray from that template.
My work here
is done.
Now go and do
something about that pink away kit
Arf!
At least the home shirt is looking very classy this year.
Stockings should be white, mind...
The Rolling Stoned played in Monmouth marketplace
last weekend. A damn fine 'PS circa Give Out' tribute band to be sure :-)
As an impressionable teenager
in the early 80s, my first pop love was Howard Jones.
I still maintain that 'Human's Lib' is a cracking album by any standards, and it stood out in '83, '84. The lyrics were weird and dark at times, co-authored by mysterious, reclusive hippy William Bryant. Great tunes and arrangements too. I saw HJ on a tour to promote an album of remixes in '84, and loved every minute of it. (Hovever, even then I wondered if he'd already run out of ideas...)
The following year he released his second album 'Dream Into Action' - no co-authored lyrics on this one, and it showed, just twee hippy positivity (Life In One Day), ill conceived clunkers (Hunger For The Flesh) and songs no man in his thirties should be singing (Look Mama). I wanted to like it, I bought it, I saw the gig, I dutifully sang along (and endured him scolding us for not singing properly...)
But it wasn't the same - something had gone badly wrong with my hero's mojo, and I couldn't name a single HJ record since 1985.
I think that the bad mood I got into post-HJ fueled my subsequent love for The Cure, a love which endures to this day. So, I've got something to thank him for.
Gomez
They had me at album 1.
They lost me at album 2.
Kings of Leon
I adored their first two albums but from album 3 onwards I cannot bear to hear their music let alone go and see them again. In fairness to me, they changed from a country-punk band to a rawk band.
About the time they started writing their own songs then?
There's a lot to be said for producer/svengali figures in the right situation.
Good call
I'm with you on this, except I lost them even earlier - after the first album. Some brilliant stuff there, like the hook- and riff-heavy 'Red Morning Light' and 'Joe's Head' and the slower 'Trani' and 'Dusty'. Those quality hooks were replaced by half a good album for the second one (I'll take the first two tracks, plus 'The Bucket' and 'Milk' and leave the rest), and a couple of interesting singles I've heard on the radio since then, but nothing I'd want to splash out €13.99 on.
Pink Floyd & Genesis
Pink Floyd - no decent songs since The Wall
Genesis - no decent records since And Then There Were Three
I'd agree but slipping the both one album
Pink Floyd - no decent records since The Final Cut
Genesis - no decent records since Duke
They lost me at Duke
I always thought that sounded like it should have been the first Phil Collins solo Album.
Duke would make a cracking Genesis EP
Behind The Lines
Duchess
Guide Vocal
Duke's Travels
Duke's End
I'll agree the rest sounds like a Phil Collins album, although Please Don't Ask would have been a shoo-in for Face Value.
Speaking of which, wasn't In The Air Tonight originally intended to be on Duke?
Howabout
Pink Floyd - no decent records
Genesis - no decent records
*resumes pogoing to the lurkers*
:-)
U2 - Unforgettable Fire
From jailhouse rockers to bloated, white sequinned jumpsuit excess in one easy step.
U2 - The Joshua Tree/Rattle and Hum
I quite liked Unforgettable Fire but it was the American-inspired Joshua Tree/Rattle and Hum era that put me off. I've not really kept tabs with them since.
Later for me...
I still find Joshua Tree and Rattle And Hum "anthemic" in the most complimentary sense. And I think they did the right thing by ditching this sound and confounding everyone's expectations with Achtung Baby. Stayed with them until Zooropa (I thought it was a great little album: very confident and effortless) and it seemed they were settling into a nice long varied interesting career.
And then... lost them with the disco stuff and Batman thing a couple of years later. Not really paid any attention since then.
Still, they had a good 12/13 year run. Better than most bands.
Zooropa is a
cruelly overlooked record. It is effortless and has the wonderful Stay (Far Away So Close) which heralded a potential to make interesting, arty music.
Instead they decided to make music for TEFL students in Spanish football stadiums to take pictures of on their smart phones.
Seven million sales and a Grammy?
Is hardly 'overlooked', is it?
(No sign of a revival) On the Horizon?
Because each album contained at least one or two cracking songs, I kind of stuck with U2 all the way through to No Line... which was a large, dull and boring piece of filler. Time for an Achtung Baby seismic shift I think. Next album should be a psyche folk affair featuring Richard Thomson, Alela Diane and the ghost of Sandy Denny (please)
RT as lead vocalist?
Gotta be better than Bonio.
Oasis
Album #1 - This is great! Classic rock/guitar pop, nodding its head to the Beatles, Who etc with a Sex Pitols-y edge.
Album #2 - Another dose of attitude and great tunes!
Album #3 - A one trick pony (band) even if it is a really good trick. Saying you're as good as the Beatles??? You've some good tunes but you can't match their creativity and diversification.
Album #4 onwards - Please stop.
Don't forget
the b-sides album The Masterplan. Better than any of the albums after the first two.
Muse.
First time I heard them.
Thank gawd – I thought I
Thank gawd – I thought I was the only one.
me too
How and why oh why oh why does he do that sharp intake of breath thing before each utterance.
I rarely do this....
I tend to doggedly stick by bands and never admit they have gone bad, in much the same way as my hopes and dreams are constantly abused by the England football team but I still keep going back for more. My well documented love of Oasis may be a testament to this.
Keep the faith. Even if it's blind.
Funnily enough...
I watched Lord, Don't Slow Me Down on Sunday. Optical dirge.
Made me dig out the first two albums again, though - classics both.
Ian McNabb
On the 2nd tour that he did as the 'reformed' Icicle Works when he was so out of it that he could barely plug in his guitar. The first tour a year or so earlier had gone okay but maybe he was just sick of it by the 2nd. He's usually a great live performer but this time he was blown offstage by the support band, Amsterdam. It really made the scales fall from my eyes, especially when combined with the recent autobiography, which although a good read reveals a somewhat flawed, spoilt character. Still love the music and have been back to solo gigs, but not as often as I used to !
Amsterdam would blow most bands offstage, to be fair...
One of the most underrated, under-appreciated bands in the country.
"Reformed Icicle Works"
That was funny - McNabb plus no other original members!
You lost me at "Let me hear you sing..."
When I saw McNabb play a solo support to the mighty Dan Baird (who was appearing with a full electric band). A small, but happy band of acolytes indulged him by singing the chorus to "Evangeline" endlessly while he basked in their adoration. Meanwhile the rest of us who'd actually paid to hear him sing a few numbers wandered off to the bar. Reading his autobiography, notably the last paragraph, simply nailed the coffin lid shut on our long, happy relationship. I understand he's still not over it, even now.
Coldplay
I thought Yellow was really good when it came out, everybody seemed to be enthusing about them so the album was duly bought. I've disliked them ever since (and I think I've given them a fair chance now), I don't even like Yellow anymore because it sounds like Coldplay!
I don't like it
...because it's so wet.
Put me right off them, although I did like 'Politik'
THAT prml scrm gig
me and my mate were booing as loudly as we could. Basement Jaxx were ace afterwards.
Ah the wonderful Edith
Ah the wonderful Edith Bowperson, she of the "everything is just fantastically brilliant" and the, um, Comet adverts. Where's my taser when I need it?
'me and my mate were booing as loudly as we could'
nothing else to do at Glastonbury then?
The Waterboys..
from the titanic, windswept majesty of This Is The Sea, to the disappointing catch that is Fisherman's Blues. They never recovered - personally I blame Karl Wallinger for jumping ship.
Fisherman's Blues
was and is brill. The one after though, Dream Harder, was a severe disappointment.
dream harder
Was better than Room to Roam,which was the one after Fisherman's Blues.
Room to Roam is where they lost me, although sadly, l keep listening to their new stuff, hoping for a repeat of the Big Music or Fisherman's Blues magic.
How could I forget
Room To Roam? Very under-rated, IMO.
Have to disagree I'm afraid
To me, it's their worst album. Never mind, each to their own etc..
The Clash
They totally lost me at the time with Sandanista. 30 years on I think a lot of it is pretty good.
Elvis Costello has lost me more times than I can remember, starting with Goodbye Cruel World. Somehow he always gets me back though.
R.E.M.
From Up, coincidentally (not) when Bill Berry left the band. Saw a few distinctly lacklustre live performances also, notably when support act Wilco blew them off the stage.
My love for the early albums is still there, but it's not the same.
Totally agree, Dai
Murmur and Reckoning were fantastic, all dark and mysterious. I think they've gone downhill ever since with one or two exceptions.
Up
I still think that this and New Adventures In Hi-Fi are superlative albums.
Up
For another thread, I had a quick look at the Automatic FTP tracklisting, and then the Up tracklisting. It's a very close run thing.
People who say REM turned shite post-Berry can't have heard A Sad Professor or Falls to Climb.
Agree about New Adventures
but Automatic pisses all over Up
Too long
Up is just too long. And who thought it was a good idea to make the very dull Airportman the first track?
Yes and no...
Their albums from the IRS era (everything up to and including "Document") are definitely their best, but the ones since then definitely have their moments, with "New Adventures in Hi-Fi" the strongest of their later albums. They're still excellent live though.
Stirling Castle - 1999
r.e.m. lost me after this gig.It was sold as an unforgettable show in the grounds of historic Stirling Castle.Drove from North Wales with the good lady and found the gig was in the car park.No view,poor sound and it pissed down all night.Oh,and Feeder were the support.We left early and went to pub.If memory serves me,I'm sure I remember Stipe saying they would not tour this album but suddenly announcing a tour after the album struggled.Record company pressure perhaps?Anyway,it feels like it's been down hill from then.And once Stipe started to disappear up his own backside and Mills seem to become a bit of a dick,I finally fell out with them.( and a double live album didn't help either )Still listen to plenty of their stuff though.It just feels different.
EatB
that Tube performance of Thorn of Crowns from Ocean Rain. Jeez Mac yer startin' to believe yer own myth.
OC is held up as their finest work, but it's where I parted company, the first two albums are still in my top 10 with Porcupine hovering somewhere in the mid teens. Evergreen was bearable but everything else I've heard is two guys on auto pilot. The What Are You Going To Do With Your Life album sounds as bad as Travis, I picked it up for £1.99, I was done.
Prince
I became a huge fan in about 1984 when I first heard "When Doves Cry" on "Top of the Pops" one Thursday night (it was a "top 40 breaker") and became almost fanatical almost immediately. Bought every album from then on, including all of his back catalogue, and numerous import 12" singles and bootlegs. Saw him live for the first time on the "Nude" tour in 1990 at the NEC the day before my 19th birthday. Happy, happy times.
As he entered the 90s he became very, very iffy indeed, and the albums became patchy beyond belief. "Graffiti Bridge" and "Batman" were all over the place, "Diamonds & Pearls" mostly toss, and a few years later in 1996 there came the dismal "Emancipation" - a 36-track 3 CD set costing £19.99 (oh how I laughed) and if it had been a flexidisk with two tracks it would still have been overlong. On the day it came out I dashed to the shop to buy it, rushed back to work, and plonked myself down in the server room with a CD player and my lunch to have a listen. An hour later I emerged, ashen faced, and told my boss I wasn't a Prince fan anymore.
To this day, in my opinion "Emancipation" remains his absolute worst album, but "20Ten" - the one he gave away with the Daily Mirror the other week - gives it a run for its money.
On record he's now almost embarrassing. On stage, however, he's still unbelievably good.
I would respectfully disagree
All the albums you mention have some great songs on them; none of his albums, even in his 'imperial' phase, are entirely flawless, but then whose are? And are you seriously suggesting that all 36 songs on Emancipation are that bad? There are enough quality songs on there to make a very decent single album.
I also notice you've not mentioned The Gold Experience, generally acknowledged to be right up there with the 'greats' of the 80s. And the most recent trilogy (3121, Planet Earth and, yes, 20Ten) contain some of his most enjoyable tunes in ages.
As I've said before, Prince has nothing to prove; he's not going to Revolutionise the musical landscape with every new release. But it does seem mighty strange that people seem to dismiss his more recent work after one cursory listen.
Mmmmm
Gold...
I've no idea what the album is like, but for my money, that's in my top-five-never-fails-to-cheer-me-and-i've-never-skipped-it-when-it-comes-up-on-shuffle list
I'm not so sure...
Nasalhair's tale above preety much fits with my view. Stunning through the 80s (lots of travelling to see him) but truly come the 90s it was all downhill in terms of recorded materail.
I've own both 3121 and 20Ten, and apart form Black Sweat could live without them all.
But to end on happier times, if only he would do another album along the lines of The Truth then I think he may still have it.
Sheena part two
The Arms of Orion from the deeply patchy (actually there is only one good-ish song so that's not really patchy is it?) Batman LP was the precise moment when I feel out of love with Prince.
I've still not listened to the new LP (how do we know it's called Twenty10 by the way? I can't make out the title) but got the next week off work so will listen while cleaning out the kitchen cupboards. Or something.
In response...
Firstly you suggest that I "dismiss(ed) his more recent work after one cursory listen." Not at all. Believe me I've tried to like "Emancipation", "Musicology", "20Ten", "3121" and so on - plus others - but have failed. I listened to "Emancipation" many, many times, trying to find something to love in there, but only settled on two tracks (I won't name them - you'll probably dismiss them as the weakest ones) as being decent. I found "3121" to be very poor largely due to its R&B leanings (I despise R&B), but "Planet Earth" did have some good stuff, notably "Chelsea Rodgers", amongst the filler. "20Ten" is, despite what you say, utter dross.
"The Gold Experience" does have its moments - the title track, "Dolphin", "Shhh", "Shy" and the "more cowbell!"-channelling "Endorphinemachine", but it is killed by the segues plus such dismal tracks as "Now", "Billy Jack Bitch", "I Hate You" and "Pussy Control".
My personal feeling is that judging by his past output - mainly in his imperial period from "1999" to and including "Lovesexy" (and I also include "The Black Album" and "Dirty Mind") he rarely put a foot wrong, but since then it seems to me that he's *trying* too hard, apparently determined to ape trends and attempt to "sound like Prince" rather than just *being* Prince. His post-1990 output comes across as being frankly lazy, each album seemingly coming with a "will this do?" scribbled on the front, and we know that he not only *can* do better than this, but that he *is* better than this. I used to be proud to call myself a Prince fan back in the day, but these days I find it more embarrassing than anything.
Not getting into a long debate
but your original comment about giving Emancipation one hour before dismissing it rather implied 'a cursory listen', particularly considering it's three hours long in total.
I also find it odd that you criticise 3121 for its r 'n' b content, expressing dislike of same, when surely that style of music is as essential as all the others(pop, rock, funk, folk etc) he has incorporated into the Prince sound from the off.
Still, no big :-)
Cue the long debate!
Yes, "Emancipation" is three hours long (and my word, it feels it) and during that lunch break - an extended one actually - I listened to about half of each track so I could at least get a feel for how the album was. After that first, admittedly not full, listen I hadn't liked what I'd heard, and was frankly rather gutted as this was the first time I'd bought a Prince album and not liked a single track at the first listen. As patchy as the others had been there were at least a handful of tracks I liked, but on this one there was nothing (later I found two I liked, as I mentioned previously).
As for "3121" it sounds more heavily R&B (as in "modern" R&B rather than "old" / traditional R&B") inspired than anything he'd previously done, and as I'm not a fan of that particular genre of music it left me cold. The tracks I did like (e.g. "Fury", "Get On The Boat", "Love") had seemingly been bludgeoned to death in the studio so that all of their passion, fire and rawness had been buffed out and replaced by plasticky pap. As good as "Fury" sounded when he performed it live on TV, on record it sounds muted, flaccid and toothless.
Apologies if my dislike of most of Prince's recorded output since 1990 has upset you in some way (seems it has) but these days I frankly wish he'd leave the studio alone and concentrate on playing live as he seems to be intent on destroying his legacy by releasing weak album after weak album. Failing that, he should recruit a producer who will relight the fire in his belly and has then strength to tell him when something is crap, and to push him as his band apparently did circa the Revolution.
You've not upset me!
I'm obviously a Prince apologist, but I'm well aware of his faults. Thanks for elucidating your opinions; I get more fed up with people who just resort to the lazy critical shorthand of assuming he had a great 80s and has done nothing of note since. I personally don't subscribe to that point of view, but can appreciate your differing views.
I don't really agree with you on the 'legacy' bit - surely listening to an allegedly poor album wouldn't change your opinion of the 'better' material (if it was good, it will remain good whatever).
I do agree with you about the producer/band observations; although he has produced himself throughout his career, the 'imperial' period included, I concur that he does perhaps need a new perspective. However, control freak that he is, we know that's not going to happen. Overall, I just think he's in a different place both temporally and spiritually compared to his young tyro days - but isn't this the case with all artists of his longevity?
I still conclude that he has nothing to prove.
The Residents / David Sylvian
For a band with a worrying degree of scrapes / flirtations with their fanbases's tolerance levels I stuck with them (conveniently glossing over the Mole Trilogy)for them to reach their peak with the breathtakingly emotional(for these arch pranksters)"Demons Dance Alone", but "Tweedles", "The Voice of Midnight" and "Animal Lover" all left me cold- no tunes, just noodles with muttered "Good Ole Boy" asides intending to invoke menace. They at last seem to have run out of steam - hardly touring hasn't helped (Their "Demons" Royal Festival Hall show was just fantastic).
Sylvian's willfulness in following the muse since "Blemish", phah! I could weep-for a man whose musical arrangements have moved me to tears and whose choice of collaborators has been second to none, to go down the free-jazz route with Derek Bailey was not wise. I know there are some who worship his every move, but for me, I've found all his solo works since( except Nine Horses when he was in a band) to be works of endurance that are just too dour..cheer up David! Tell you what, come and have a pint with me and I'll book you in for a quickie with Big Sally round the back of the Brookland's Pub - that'll cheer you up, morose motherf***er.
Manofon
One of the only CDs I have bought in recent years that I deliberately made a point of bringing back for a refund, due to its complete un-listenability. Utterly self-indulgent twaddle.
I hope he got my message!
I'm going to sound ancient...
Elvis after Elvis is Back! The 70s comeback isn't bad but not in the same league.
The Velvet Underground after their second.
The Stones after Goat's Head Soup.
10cc after Original Soundtrack.
T. Rex after Tanx.
Pink Floyd after Piper At The Gates Of Dawn.
Incidentally, I think Chaos and Disorder is Prince's most under-rated album. And I love XTRMNTR. (That was just to make me feel younger).
T.Rex
They lost me when l took the day off school to go and buy the Teenage Dream single, rushed home to listen to it, and decided to head down the Staus Quo and Deep Purple path instead.
The Sweet
when they did a van advert.
Mud - when they went disco.
Morrissey - probably around Vauxhall And I.
Morrissey ...
... at Kill Uncle. Though Vauxhall and I is good. Never bothered since, what with me being older and a clever swine.
Haircut 100 lost me
when Nick left.
Nanci Griffith
I adored Nanci Griffith in the late 80s. She started to lose me with 'Storms', and after 'Late Night Grande Hotel' I just kind of drifted away.
I really must give One Fair Summer Evening a play soon, though.
And to continue on the semi-country tip
Emmylou Harris' last one wasn't up to much. A shame after such a sterling run from Wrecking Ball. A very uncharismatic performance in Dublin didn't help me much either. :(
Bowie
lost me at Let's Dance
Macca lost me at Press To Play (he got me back again since, mind)
Stones lost me at Tattoo You
Rod Stewart lost me at Blondes Have More Fun
Lennon lost me as early as Mind Games
Bowie
lost me at Let's Dance too. It took me until Hours... to be a then somewhat intermittent Bowie fan for the next ten years or so.
My Bowie 'wilderness years' were filled with catching up with the music of Rockpile members Nick Lowe and Dave Edmunds. Dave Edmunds lost me with Information especially with the Jeff Lynne collaboration but I chose to ignore the odd clunker from Nick Lowe, and first discovered the Word magazine reading about At My Age.
Yes
Trevor bloody Rabin.
You made it past
the Yeggles at least!
I did
And Drama is a very, very good Yes record, albeit that Trevor Horn struggled with some of the old material when they played live. At least he tried to stay faithful to it, unlike Rabin who turned every Steve Howe guitar line into another bloody squawking solo.
It seemed to me that...
Horn was a fan who wanted to be the lead vocalist of a band he loved.
Rabin was a freelance musician who saw the chance to 'take-over' the band and piggy-back on their name and ready-made audience.
90125 was a good album and it still gets occasional plays here but it wasn't a Yes album; it was an album by The Trevor Rabin Band with the name scibbled out and a Yes logo quickly drawn on in crayon.
Yes and no
I was clearing out some old bootlegs the other day and happened upon a cd of early demos for 90125. Christ on a bike they're awful, Rabin all over it, the kind of stuff even Foreigner would reject.
So yes, while I agree that 90125 is the Trevor Rabin Band, it could have been a lot worse.
Rush - Stafford Bingley Hall 1981
There was a crowd stampede at the front of the stage. People falling and struggling to get back up. One of the few times have felt very scared in a crowd.
All I recall is Geddy Lee looking down with a grin on his face - he could clearly see what was happening in front of him.
Neil Young. Not so much a moment as a decade.
Why did it take so long? Mirror Ball. Argh. Broken Arrow. Aargh. Silver and Gold. Aaargh. Are you Passionate. Aaaaargh. Greendale. Aaaaaargh. Prairie Wind. Aaaaaaargh. Living With War. Aaaaaaaaargh. Only then did I see the light.
I've said it before
I think Greendale is a really good album. Living With War was pretty good too. All of the others had their moments, but no consistency.
Mirror Ball
Has aged really well.
I love ...
... Prairie Wind, a beautiful reflective near masterpiece. Are you Passionate may be his worst album, Greendale and S and G have their moments. The others are pants as you say.
The Zutons and their downward slide.
First album: Ah, this is quite good. Some boss tunes (as I think they say in Liverpool) and the saxophone player's a bit hot- that always helps (c.f. What Floats your Boat?)
Second Album: A few good tracks here, but what's this Dave McCabe has rhymed 'language' with 'sandwich'. Bloody hell, these lyrics are terrible. The album ends very poorly too.
Third album: Heard it once, thought it was shite, never bought it.
Emerson Lake & bloody Palmer
Gutted when Emerson ditched The Nice, whose every moment of existence I had followed as closely as you could in the days prior t'interweb thingie.
Saw one of the early ELP gigs and went home broken-hearted at the waste of all that talent on the shear arrogant, bombastic, indulgent, dick (or theramin) waggling grossness of it all.
Mind you, in retrospect The Nice were a bunch of posers - but I was only 16......
The Nice
never equalled this...
Fiery Furnaces/ ATV
'Gallowsbird's Bark' is one of my favourite US albums of the 2000s-catchy, sassy folk/pop. But the FF were determined to be neo-prog band, and while the symphonic 'Blueberry Boat' had its moments, the biographical concept album 'Rehearsing My Choir' was a recondite sequence of tone poems and really rather boring. Their moment had passed...
And that reminds me...much as I admire the ambition of Mark Perry and ATV, everything after 'The Image has Cracked' works better as a concept than a listening experience.
My big brother
lost interest in The Smiths when Shakespeare's Sister came out. At the time it was terrible but looking back, title track of Queen is Dead aside, I don't think they got any better.
Sweet
and Tender Hooligan..Moz got angrier, the words got nastier and the guitars got heavier. Who knows what might have been..
I do quite like
Sheila and Shoplifters, I must say.
Radiohead.
Lost me, but for a handful of songs, at Kid A. Regained me at In Rainbows. Now that's not an easy trick to pull off.
And yeah, I know, we've had the "Hail To The Kid Amnesiac" argument before. I still don't like 'em.
Oasis
I was a couple of months short of my 20th birthday when Be Here Now was released and I was doing my military service. Oasis had helped me get through high school (or upper secondary school or whatever it´s called in Britain, I´m going American for one word- sorry). When Be Here Now arrived I remember a feeling of the party being over. But while it lasted it was one hell of a binge. Every single song knocked me over, both albums and single. D´You Know What I Mean felt like a song that would grow on you if you gave it some time, and it actually did. But then it was goodbye for me.
When I relationship ended at the same time I opted for Bob Dylan´s Time Out Of Mind instead. It´s still one of the most powerful albums I´ve heard. It started with Love Sick if nothing else. He had me at hello.
Iron Maiden
Loyal support ended at the release of No Prayer For The Dying.
Particularly the 'Bring Your Daughter To The Slaughter' single.
Seen live a couple of times after, but never liked the later albums (I have tried).
Early albums still get (fairly) regular plays
Van Morrison
lost me at 'Hymns To The Silence' in 1991, a bloated self parody of a double album.
I gave away my ticket for the third and final night of his Belfast shows that year having sat through the two previous nights with my head in my hands. I went back the next year and from time to time subsequently just to check but even live, despite the occasional flash of brilliance, it became a rapidly diminishing return. I'll not be back.
Give him enough rope or Dope On A Rope
The Rolling Stones lost me and I've never really re-engaged with them since, back in 1976.
It was on the Black and Blue tour. This tour was the first UK outing for new boy Ronnie Wood.
We went to see them at the country cowshed known as Bingley Hall, Stafford. It's a grim venue. To say the facilities are stark is probably an overstatement.
Support was provided by The Meters. They did their set, which seemed pretty short, and then went off. Then we waited. And we waited and waited a bit more.
Eventually they strolled on stage. For all the effort they were putting in, for the attempts to engage the audience, to look as though they gave a flying f**k about us, they might as well as been playing a rehearsal.
After a while Mick decides to speak between songs. He starts off on a "Hello Stafford, we love this place..." then realises, as we're in the middle of the countryside, no-one actually lives here. So he backtracks and tells us he knows we don't come from Stafford. Have we come from Manchester? That LSE education didn't totally go to waste then.
And so things plod on. But the nadir comes when a stirrup is lowered from the roof. Step forward Billy Preston. He walks up to the mike "Do you want to see Mick swing out?" he hollers. The response is muted. "I can't hear you, do you want to see Mick swing out?". "Noooo" I yell as loudly as I can, but am unfortunately outnumbered by those who no longer want to see a rock and roll show from the supposedly greatest rock and roll band in the world, but want to see Mick Jagger swinging from a cable out over our heads. Billy exhorts us to beg even more for Mick to do his mighty swing thing.
In the US they got all sorts of giant size inflatable phalluses (not that I particular want to see that) and other visual enhancements. We get Mick on a rope. I have to say a rather nervous looking Mick on a rope, but that's it. Mick Jagger Swinging On A Rope. It's Only Rock 'n Roll and it is totally f**king useless. Didn't give a flying f**k I thought, when instead we get a flying f**ker.
When we were kids and we'd swing on a rope in the woods, little did we know we were setting a precedent for the prancing ninny we'd seen on Top of the Pops. Little did I realise that one day I'd pay good money to see someone do what we were doing for free.
Rock 'n Roll - Phew!
so many nadirs
"Afterglow" and "And then they were crap" lost Genesis for me.
Peter Gabriel likewise after "So".
Clash after "Combat Rock".
Eric Clapton after about 1968.
ELP after "Love Beach".
The Stranglers after "The Raven".
Rod Stewart after "Sailing", Macca after "Mull of Kintyre", John Lennon aftyer "imagine".
ELP *after* Love Beach?
Love Beach itself was the point when they lost me. Dreadful record - and worse sleeve.
MANIC STREET PREACHERS
after Everything Must Go
AND am I wrong in thinking that EVERY MSP song has the same drum pattern?
Roxy Music post Manifesto
Brilliant through to Country Life. A bit of a break for Ferry to get his ego under control then Manifesto. OK....but then Avalon and the other MOR albums. Dull coffee table stuff which sold by their millions. Recent tours have seen them ditch this stuff in favour of gems from For Your Pleasure/Stranded/Siren but I gather that they'll be doing more from their later period to fill the likes of the 02 with the furry dice mob. Shame.
No, don't agree
with regard to Avalon. Radically different to the earlier stuff yes, but a masterpiece on its own terms.
For me the dip
came with Siren, which was patchy and seemed aimed at the US market.
Manifesto was a striking return - the title track is superb - and I agree that Avalon is a masterpiece.
The runt of the late period litter is surely Flesh & Blood. A couple of singles and a smattering of covers, it sounds more like a Ferry solo project.
It does
have "Running Wild" on it though
And
Oh Yeah
And
In The Midnight Hour ... terrible, terrible cover version.
The Clash lost me with "London Calling"
hard to believe it now but at the time they did indeed lose me, along with most of my hard-line year zero no selling-out Joe Strummer worshipping teeny Punk Rockers. It was just hard to accept, it wasn't Punk Rock, it was a big cop-out and we all went off and listened to Crass "Yes that's right Punk is dead, just another cheap product for the consumer...blah blah and boring blah".
Took me a year or two to finally appreciate just what a masterpiece of eclectic classic rock that album actually was.
Hawkwind..
their very first album (1970) was an original piece of space rock combining good rhythm section with whooshing electronics, nice guitar wig-outs, even melodies. I was smitten. Then album two, In Search Of Space. Guitarist and inspiration gone, they just ploughed along on a few very basic chord changes, utter tosh. Nicely packaged though. Lost me completely with that one.
Arcade Fire
I can't get past track 5 of the new album, so disappointingly dull.
oooh, I dunno.
I wasn't a fan of Neon Bible but this one seems to be settling in nicely.
I've had an interesting experience
with this album myself.
I've gone from "Jesus, this is dull pish" to "this is an extraordinary masterpiece of great profundity" over maybe 12 listens.
Its marvellous. As good as we were all told Funeral was. Dripping with great wee moments, references to other, earlier songs on the record and the ability to create a world within a record which has largely been lost in the MP3 now-world. It's also dripping with clever musical references as the music of the suburbs moves from 70's West Coast to 80's electro rock all in service to the ongoing story of the albums protaganist.
It's the first album I've listened to whilst reading the lyrics in many years and I'm 41.
Magical stuff. Get it.
The Beatles
...Lost it with Let it Be. Overproduced. Too much filler. Gave up on them after that...