Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

The Allman Brothers in 1970. Can anyone play as well as this anymore?

David Hepworth's picture

So here's the thing. I've just found this not very pin-sharp footage of the Allman Brothers Band playing live at the Fillmore East in September 1970, presumably during the same week they recorded their famous live album. Now I know it's probably true that nobody would want to hear this kind of thing nowadays and it's certainly not the kind of thing that gets you a session on night time Radio One but, look, Duane Allman is twenty-three. Twenty-three. The average age of the band can't be much more. He's already played on "Layla" and recorded with Aretha Franklin. He's the age most people are trying to get some work experience. There are no click-tracks, no pre-recorded samples in use, you don't even get the sense that it's actually a performance. It's just a bunch of blokes playing, pretty much as they would in a rehearsal room. Now as I say I know it's ancient and dated and all that but what I want to know is this. Now that we've got Rock Schools on every corner and you can probably do a university course in Rock, is it conceivable that you could find a bunch of musicians in their early twenties nowadays who could play anything like as well as this?

4

I don't know what it was exactly...

but a typical musician back then seemed to have compressed a lifetime's experiences into a few short years and perhaps this is why that generation developed as players so quickly. And some started ridiculously young, like Robbie Robertson for instance. And I'm not necessarily talking about being 'King Widdly', rather that they understood the importance of listening to their fellow musicians and playing sympathetically. So bands of that era really sounded like bands; The Band being a perfect example.

1
Patrick Crowther | 26 January 2010 - 4:06pm

I suppose

you'd have to look to young jazz musicians to get anywhere near to anything like this today. But could they "perform" as well as play by which I mean could they make their way through a track with other musicians to be greater than the sum of their parts?

My father-in-law is in his 70s but took up drum lessons a few years ago. His thing is jazz and he plays drums with teenagers who amaze him with their virtuosity. He's astounded when some 15 year old name checks Harry Allen or an old drummer like Buddy Rich.

0
Ahh_Bisto | 26 January 2010 - 4:04pm

good point

There are plenty of talented musicians out there, but rock music today doesn't have room to accommodate people who want to play extended blues numbers. Or at least not in the sense of music that shifts units. They are out there though, playing small clubs and festivals. I agree that the young jazz players have the technigue and the expressive ability to make music that is greater than the sum of its parts. An example would be the young Australian bassist Tal Wilkenfeld, who I think is only in her mid 20s and has played with Jeff Beck and Chick Corea.

0
Nick Duvet | 26 January 2010 - 9:23pm

Agreed

Tal Wilkenfeld is one of the most talented bassists out there, and it is amazing how much she has achieved at such a young age!

0
marthasp6s (not verified) | 26 January 2010 - 11:03pm

Maybe

I think the point is he was a prodigy and probably better at that kind of super long jamming thang - than almost anyone other than the obvious - maybe Clapton in Cream, Rory Gallagher in Taste - I doubt many beyond them could play like that then. I wouldn't be surprised if there are young guitarists out there who aspire to play like that but noone would be remotely interested in them, more is the pity. Personally I adore the Allman Brothers and in fact was amiably debating Duane's 21 minute guitar solo on "You don't love me" off the Filmore album with Azzeem on Friday night. It is a magical thing, melodic, full of invention, ever changing, and if someone transposed onto manuscript it a concert violinist would probably play it thinking it was a lost masterpiece by Paganini.

0
Twangothan | 26 January 2010 - 5:10pm

Well, here's two for starters

Not all of todays yoof are emo's or devoted soley to indie landfill. But they remain beneath the gaze of the media (and probably therefore the "rock schools") because they play that most unfashionable of genres - blues music.

The clip below was recorded when I think Krissy Matthews was 17 or 18 - the vocals aren't great but the guitar makes up for it


Olli Brown can't be much older


I agree - neither will ever be on Radio 1 (just like the Allman's wouldn't be today either). But you're wrong about nobody wanting to hear this kind of thing. Not many may want to hear it - we may be a distinct minority but I still love this kind of stuff. Luckily there are a few kids that do too.

0
fortuneight | 26 January 2010 - 6:13pm

Sorry to say that

while I agree they can both play the blues with dexterity and aplomb, neither of these guys have anything like the soul, swing or sheer musicality that Duane Allman and Dickie Betts bring to the strings.

1
Vulpes Vulpes | 26 January 2010 - 7:04pm

Well, I see things a little differently

I wouldn't suggest that either are going to be another Duane but having seen both Krissy and Oli live they put on a great show, and who knows how much further they will develop? They've still got another 4 or 5 years of gigging before they get to the point that the Allmans were in the clip above.

My suggestion is simply that people give them a look and see if there's anything there that they like.

0
fortuneight | 26 January 2010 - 9:03pm

I'm with you

I think it's not impossible that there are young players who can ape what people like Duane Allman were doing to some degree but the point is that people like him and Eric Clapton *invented* this way of playing and at the same time perfected it. In 1965 Eric Clapton was playing beat numbers with Yardbirds and a few short years later he had been through Cream and Blind Faith and was doing "Little Wing" with Derek and the Dominos. That's a rate of change and development that, it seems to me, nobody today can match.

1
David Hepworth | 26 January 2010 - 10:40pm

well, you're right

that is a period of rock's evolution that can never be repeated and as such, musicians coming through now exist in a different environment. Some of them may go back to the roots of popular music, but for most of them it's ancient history. There isn't that connection to the roots that Eric and Duane and Jimmy and Jeff all felt.

1
Nick Duvet | 26 January 2010 - 10:50pm

The Derek Trucks Band are good


(nephew of Allman Brothers drummer Butch Trucks, too.)

0
lisbon | 26 January 2010 - 6:03pm

Derek now regulalry plays

in the current version of the Allman Brothers Band

0
fortuneight | 26 January 2010 - 6:16pm

They wanted it

David, you know what you were saying on the podcast about success being a result of wanting it hard enough? Legend has it that Duane Allman got the gig(s) as a session player at FAME by camping outside the studio and repeatedly badgering Rick Hall to let him work there.

Once he was in for his first Wilson Pickett session, then he made his mark and of course graced further recordings by Aretha Franklin, Clarence Carter, Johnny Jenkins, King Curtis, Arthur Conley and even Lulu.
By 1970, I guess you could say that sheer determination with a talent to match had got him that far, and I think you can hear it in his playing.

1
Lucas Hare | 26 January 2010 - 6:47pm

Arctic Monkeys

Musically this young lot are pretty hot, especially the drummer. And lyrically, he is way ahead of his peers.


0
kb | 26 January 2010 - 7:20pm

YOU

are having a laff... right?

0
geacher53 | 26 January 2010 - 10:25pm

Nope

He is a brilliant drummer, brings the songs alive and plays unexpected fills and patterns. And the couplets Alex uses, especially on the 1st album, are exceptional. I can't comment on the guitar playing so wasn't comparing to the Allman fella.

0
kb | 27 January 2010 - 10:43am

Buddy Rich...

can rest easy tonight.

0
Patrick Crowther | 27 January 2010 - 10:44am

What was it Dylan said?

"Nothing but force"

0
Pax Romana | 29 January 2010 - 3:12pm

"Nothing But Force"

Which could be taken either way, no? This is the man who said about the book 'Invisible Republic': "Greil Marcus has done it again"...

0
Lucas Hare | 29 January 2010 - 7:31pm

Was there an ambiguity

I didn't notice

0
Pax Romana | 30 January 2010 - 10:28am

Matter of opinion

I was never sure which way it was meant. Barney Hoskyns always assumed that Dylan's description was derogatory:

"Dylan himself was to complain that Tour '74 consisted of "nothing but force", but often that force (on Before The Flood's 'All Along the Watchtower', for example) was pretty awesome." (Mojo, January 1994, reproduced on The Band's website,

http://theband.hiof.no/articles/hoskyns_mojo_january_1994.html

)

but I remain undecided.

0
Lucas Hare | 30 January 2010 - 10:43am

Lamacq was talking about this on a recent podcast.

His point being that plenty of bands can "play" really well, members strumming away since their early teens is pretty common. What's uncommon is having anything to say.

My own opinion here is that if people want to play as well as that and are lucky enough to meet like minded souls then they will. But do the kids want to play like Allman? Perhaps not now, but perhaps in a few years. What's valued musically seems to change an awful lot.

1
ganglesprocket | 26 January 2010 - 7:30pm

Nice clip and all that..

But, let's be honest, it's not very now, is it? I mean.. the guitars are OK but I bet Duane Allman wouldn't have a clue at programming a sequencer. Get with it, Daddy-O..

1
Lenny Law | 26 January 2010 - 8:09pm

Weapons grade widdly widdly

Players today are frighteningly accomplished thanks to VHS/DVD/Youtube & many other ways of learning skills. The styles of music around currently don't allow much room for self-expression though and people can master technique without musical feel anyhow.

There is a tendency to go for 'weapons grade widdly widdly' when playing the guitar, showing off your bag of tricks without playing a song. This dates back to the influence of Joe Satriani's Surfing With The Alien, which ironically is jam-packed with hooks and is effectively the work of a one-man shred-Shadows. Unfortunately people only heard the manual dexterity and took it from there. I bet Joe wakes up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat wondering what he has created.

Surfing with the Alien came out in 1987, 20 years after Are You Experienced. That was 23 years ago.

0
Mavis Diles | 27 January 2010 - 10:52am

I think your assessment

of Joe's work is spot on, but I thought you could trace the school of widdly widdly back even further - Alvin Lee springs to mind.

0
fortuneight | 27 January 2010 - 1:20pm

I blame Yngwie Malmsteen.

For everything. Do listen to him unleashing "the fucking fury"

http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/BLABBERMOUTH.net/news.aspx?mode=Article...

0
nicktf | 27 January 2010 - 11:41pm

A great Yngwie story...

was told to me by the DJ Bob Harris some years back. Bob had been asked to compere a guitarists awards show but had got stuck in traffic and turned up just as it was starting. He had no time to prepare anything. So he gets up on stage and reads the name of the first winner... David Gilmour. Fine. Next winner... Hank Marvin. Fine. Then things start to unravel - Bob looks down at his cue card and sees that an award is going to a guitar player he has never heard of whose name he has no idea how to pronounce.

So he just goes for it - "And for best widdly album of the year - Yungwee Marmstane."

At this point a rather narked gentleman sporting poodle rawk hair and a leather waistcoat over an exposed beer belly takes to the stage. He grabs the microphone: "My name is Y-N-G-W-I-E! YYNGWIE MALMSTEEN!" Cue much hilarity in the audience and Bob Harris' realizing that he has introduced a complete twat.

0
Patrick Crowther | 28 January 2010 - 9:26am

thankyou

I'd forgotten about him (and Uli Jon Roth). That story is brilliant!

0
Mavis Diles | 28 January 2010 - 11:22am

Leave it, as ever, to The Onion

I'm sure I've posted this before. So what. It's still good.

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/34676

0
Lenny Law | 28 January 2010 - 10:33pm

Do you also say Frodorick?...

0
bricameron | 29 January 2010 - 10:35pm

The world is full of hothouse..

..trained young "virtuosos" (the blues scene seems to attract them like flies), along with the regulatory "stage dad". These kids can play every lick under the sun, but the idea that any of them know the first thing about true improvisaton (i.e. working in concert and sympathy with the other players) is, frankly laughable.
The two UK examples above? Sorry, but they both seem to have sprung neat as ninepence from the same cloning machine.They shouldn't be anywhere near a profile gig until they have something real to play.
I have nothing against young people playing this style of music (look at the mighty Free, average age 17 when they made "Tons Of Sobs")but they really should stay in the shed until they're good and ready.
(..and yes Dave, Derek Trucks can play like that)

0
shane pacey | 27 January 2010 - 12:08pm

Hmm.... young people of today ....

should be seen but not heard .....

Sorry Shane, I don't mean to be antgonistic but that's a bit damming. It's also pretty nigh impossible. Rehearse in a locked room for 10 years and then spring out as the fully complete article?

These guys are doing it the traditional way - gigging solidly, getting all the experience they can. They certainly aren't doing it for the money or the media attention. They are doing it because its a form of music they love. And I say more power to their plectrums. It's true, there are a number of acts where the ratio of insight and feel is out of proportion to technical chops, but that's not confined to just young acts

Lets face it if gigs were limited to bands who have something "real" to say, be very little live music at all.

0
fortuneight | 27 January 2010 - 1:18pm

Sorry Fortune..

..I'm just very cynical about this. I work in the blues scene, and I've seen it too many times, young kid with some talent is pushed heavily (usually by a parent) tours like mad and then burns out by the age of 20, realising they're not a prodigy any more.
Never given a chance to develop properly, never learn to write songs properly and never really learn how to work a stage.
I'm 52 and feel that only now, am I starting to hit it.
I'm sure they are doing it because they love it, but that's surely not enough..is it?

0
shane pacey | 27 January 2010 - 10:15pm

Just a thought, Shane..

Your words remind me so much of the film Crossroads, with the young hotshot who can play like a bastard but has to be taught the heart of the blues by his experiences with an old mentor. A jolly fine little film. It is always ironic when blues, a genre with roots in poverty, the Deep South, slavery and exploitation is adopted by middle-class white kids with a custom Tele and a decent music teacher.

0
Lenny Law | 27 January 2010 - 10:50pm

Middle class white kids..

..have been playing blues almost as long as the music has existed (if you go back to Jimmy Rogers "Blue Yodel" that is) ain't nothing wrong with that, but since the advent of Stevie Ray Vaughan, blues seems to be defined by one young hotshot on guitar backed by a rhythm section desperately trying to keep it together, as opposed to something like the aforesaid Allmans or even Cream, for whom the fireworks of improvisation were a collective thing.
I've seen master rhythm sections counseled by stage dads for overplaying, therefore taking the spotlight off youg Amadeus, who can't cope with a song being played slightly differently from the night before.
None of these kids, it seems, listen to the real McCoy..the great Chicago blues combos or even past masters like Albert King or Johnny Shines, which is the thing that REALLY separates them from their blueswailin' British predecessors.

0
shane pacey | 27 January 2010 - 11:16pm

Fair point

Rather than just add an up arrow - to add to what Toby said your posts add a perspective I hadn’t considered. Overall I’ve been pleased to just see some kids get up and have a go. This is partly because as an utterly crap blues loving guitarist myself, I admire anyone who is doing what I neither have the nerve nor the ability to do. It’s also because without some younger people taking an interest, live blues music – hardly prospering here in the UK in any form - would be in danger of dying out. But it’s a fair point you make – none of the above necessarily makes them any good.

I can see what you mean about kids being unduly pushed and not really being able to separate technique and feel. Case in point is one of Krissy Matthews early CD’s – the playing is fine, but his pre-pubescent vocals pretty much render the whole thing unlistenable. It got me wondering if there are any pros out there now who have an early catalogue they would rather forget – apart from Bowie and the Laughing Gnome. John “Cougar” Mellencamp maybe?

Anyway, if you’re ever gigging in the UK, let me know.

0
fortuneight | 29 January 2010 - 2:29pm

Fair point

Rather than just add an up arrow - to add to what Toby said your posts add a perspective I hadn’t considered. Overall I’ve been pleased to just see some kids get up and have a go. This is partly because as an utterly crap blues loving guitarist myself, I admire anyone who is doing what I neither have the nerve nor the ability to do. It’s also because without some younger people taking an interest, live blues music – hardly prospering here in the UK in any form - would be in danger of dying out. But it’s a fair point you make – none of the above necessarily makes them any good.

I can see what you mean about kids being unduly pushed and not really being able to separate technique and feel. Case in point is one of Krissy Matthews early CD’s – the playing is fine, but his pre-pubescent vocals pretty much render the whole thing unlistenable. It got me wondering if there are any pros out there now who have an early catalogue they would rather forget – apart from Bowie and the Laughing Gnome. John “Cougar” Mellencamp maybe?

Anyway, if you’re ever gigging in the UK, let me know.

0
fortuneight | 29 January 2010 - 2:29pm

Of course..

..every great artist, blues or not, has an early catalogue that may embarrass them, certainly Clapton's work with the Yardbirds isn't anyone's idea of classy blues playing (although I kind of like it anyway)
Perhaps there now isn't the natural order of progress that those artists had (small clubs, colleges, concerts etc)that enabled them to develop naturally and to create an original approach into the bargain.
I'm certainly pleased to see young people play anything that requires something other than the manipulation of turntables and software, but I'll be over the moon when one of them comes up with something special and original which takes the music to their own generation rather than a bunch of slightly grumpy old men.(I'm including me here, of course)

So here's a 12 year old Norwegian..he's almost as god as Stevie Ray.

0
shane pacey | 29 January 2010 - 9:56pm

good observations shane

so when are you touring melbourne ?

0
Junior Wells | 28 January 2010 - 9:28pm

Cheers T

Hopefully in the middle of the year.

0
shane pacey | 28 January 2010 - 9:37pm

Betchadupa

They don't exist any more, but the backing band to Vedder were about 15 at the time. It's the drummer who does it for me.


0
Nigell | 27 January 2010 - 1:14pm

off topic but interesting anecdote

the allamns were reputedly a taciturn bunch, especially when it came to photoshoots.

The cover of live at the filmore shows them displaying unbridled mirth.

why?

apparently Duane's dealer arrived during the shoot and the small bag he is holding in the photo was a bag of just acquired coke.

0
Junior Wells | 27 January 2010 - 11:28pm

It's not all just about technique

Sorry if I'm retreading previous comments here, but it's a point worth dwelling on I think:

An immediate difference I can see between the Allmans and the more modern blues clips above is that with the Allmans the ensemble playing is at least as important as the individual virtuosity.

Just about every great (rock) virtuoso of the past had a great band behind him (or her!). Hendrix is the obvious example: seems to be the very model of a twiddly diddly show-off soloist but on the whole he was part of a tight and muscular power trio which is a big part of his impact.

And the Arctic Monkeys: no, not virtuosos, but they have a solid ensemble sound where everyone knows their place. I think that's more important.

1
Stephen Merrick | 27 January 2010 - 11:48pm

The sound of a guitar player taking off

At 4.13:


0
Lucas Hare | 28 January 2010 - 9:49am

Niiiice

Need to dig out this album again. Every so often I need a white-man's-blues amnesty before I go off the whole genre again in disgust!

0
Stephen Merrick | 28 January 2010 - 10:59pm
bricameron | 30 January 2010 - 3:55am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2010 Development Hell Ltd