Entertainment For Lively Minds
Thatcher?
Posted by Rab100 on 19 October 2010 - 11:47pm.
Margaret Thatcher is in hospital, a frail old lady. Is it okay to laugh at her demise or should we feel sorry for someone coming to the end of their life and forgive? I for one will be happy to play "Tramp the Dirt Down" on the day she dies. She destroyed the lives of so many people in this country and persued policies that openly supported cruel and repressive regimes across the globe, never giving it a second thought. She was/is a thoroughly detestable person and deserves every last cruel joke.
- More from Rab100.
- Login or register to post comments










If she fails to make it through Wednesday
then she'll steal headlines from the publication of the Public Spending Review result and she will have had one last evil laugh.
You may want to join in here
http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/content/political-threads
Whatever you think of her
This is not the place for such bile, vitriol and nastiness.
Shame on you.
Yes, quite right
Whatever we do, we mustn't show a cold, uncaring, callous disregard for those less fortunate than ourselves, must we?
After all, that particular brand of crass "devil take the hindmost" attitude is best left to those who were born to it, such as - oh, I don't know - Maggie herself?
Wrong
Thatcher may have been many things, but your insinuation that she was 'born to it' is wrong. She didn't have a privileged background - lower middle class and parochial would be more accurate. Her (misguided) social and political instincts were born out of following her father's narrow-minded principles. She actually disdained the traditional advantages of wealth and class embodied by the Tory wets and grandees.
Not really
I do realise she was 'only' a grocer's daughter from Grantham.
By "born to it" I didn't mean wealth, but the traditional Tory uncaring, 'I'm alright Jack' attitude she displayed so often as Prime Minster.
And by the way, while I have nothing but contempt for Maggie, I'd never wish death on her, or anyone else. It's a bit crass, innit?
Her father
was a milionaire, if I remember rightly. His supermarket wasn't quite the village grocery often portrayed.
And the current fad for attributing egalitarian tendencies to her needs soem challenging too. She, single-handedly, reintroduced the creation of hereditary peerages.
A Grantham Resident Writes
Thatcher grew up in the flat over the shop and it's not very large. It's now an alt-med shop peddling Reiki and Hopi Ear Candling among other things. Apparently that shop attracts dodgy ideas...
Alf Roberts was a pretty successful businessman though not, I suspect, a millionaire, owning two grocery shops and was an alderman and a lay preacher for many years.
And fond of molesting his shop girls apparently: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/thatchers-dad-mayor-preacher-groper-12...
Why not?
The OP expresses some pretty strong sentiments but that's OK.
Unlike the proliferation of banal 'You're shit ha ha' style of reportage that appears dispiritingly often (The Word, occasionally... sadly, included), the OP at least has thought about it and has reason to go with it.
New battles
I am trying really hard to be fair lately, against the instincts of a lifetime. My very bones know the jokes, a la Stalin, about going to her funeral just to make damned sure she is dead, and when Costello wrote his song, I thought it bang on the money. A great part of me still does. However the implication from so many press reports is that she is already gaga, and now I find that sad, even for someone I have hated, loathed and detested with a passion all my adult life.
On the other hand, I read today that Thatcher to be be portrayed on film by Meryl Streep and that the portrayal will be "sympathetic".
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5hXBzxWvwBf5jB6K33...
Not that is still worth taking fierce exception to, not least because we have seen even shallow movies for the international market have a habit of cementing the narrative about a public figure. A sycophantic portrait of Thatcher released to coincide with her demise would be toxic, in my view.
"Forgive" is the wrong word. Thatcher in her person is long gone.
However her heirs are in power and in their pomp, and the real battle now is with them about her legacy and whether what we need is more of the same. I will argue with anyone who claims her legacy has worth and honour. But as for the person of Thatcher herself, I am trying to let it go.
She was a horrible old bag and I will laugh at the jokes
But that's about it.
I can see a version of the Four Yorkshiremen sketch developing here with people out-trumping each other with increasingly creative ways of showing disprespect.
Well we had it tough
we had to go to pit at 4 in morning. Til she closed it down so I made a mint with me own taxi firm thru t' enterprise allowance scheme
Bugger....
Ding Dong
I shall be playing Ghost Town in her honour.
Death
Is it now OK to celebrate the deaths of our chosen hate figures?
I for one intend to get pissed as a fart when Brother Scargill pops his clogs. In the nicest possible way, of course.
Back in the late eighties, I had stocked up on Lambrusco, peanuts and light ale with a view to celebrate the impending doom of a particularly nasty singer-songwriter who was, at the time, losing his (totally unpublicised) battle with substance addiction.
Unfortunately he survived and went on to make even more useless records. Oh how I wept.
Running the risk of a 'collateral damage' demise of your own
.. with that menu - a messy end indeed - and bitterly ironic
I'm doing a 'Jackson'
.....the day she dies.
Avoid the high street, avoid newspapers, tune all radios to BBC 7, have all CD players and vinyl turntables at the ready with rock 'n' roll (something her and Jackson know nothing about) and keep yer head down for a month or two.
It'll soon pass.
She didn't care for most of the people of this country so
fuck her, I've got the champagne on ice.
Champagne?
That's a bit Tory, isn't it? Or are you being ironic?
why's drinking champagne
why's drinking champagne Tory? please explain. Should 'we' only drink water and eat bread
'champagne' and its equalivent round the world drunk by peasants too you know.
Is it?
Well 'you' should know.
haven't had a drink in 8 years
but will crack open a bottle the day she goes.
I hope she
lives forever. I've seen Highlander, it's no picnic apparently. And you have to listen to Queen for all eternity. There's punishment.
if i recall correctly, the 'immortals' could only be killed
by having their heads chopped off. Which makes me think that somebody's been anticipating your wish, young Molesworth...
I posted the Costello
song on here in response to Murdoch's recent tribute to Thatcher. It's a brilliant slice of vitriol, spot on for its time, but the time has passed. As Doods says, she's just a frail old woman now, and there are new battles to fight. I celebrated when she was ousted from office, that was good enough for me. The rest is silence.
Usually
I will at least make a case for some respect by saying, 'she is someone's mother you know.'
But look at the offspring.
Case closed, bring on the gags.
The depth of loathing I feel for this creature
cannot be expressed briefly in words,so to save you all from an extended and abusive rant I'll simply say that the real pity is not that the creature is dying but that IT was ever born in the first place.
Well said sir
have an up arrow
'the lives she destroyed'
Presumably some of the 'destroyed lives' referred to in these kinds of comments include those of the miners, following the 1984-85 dispute?
As I did not set the vitriolic tone of this debate, I make no apology for pointing out the rich irony in many of the most vehement defenders of the strike now wanting every coal fired power station shut down by yesterday if not sooner in the name of saving the planet / enriching Sam Cam's dad and other aristocrats with space for a wind turbine or 100 (delete as appropriate).
Seriously, you'd think by some of the comments here and elsewhere that we were discussing the imminent demise of Josef Mengele. Embarrassing, tbh.
I'm surprised
I'm far from a fan of the woman, but I don't think I could ever celebrate or gain any happiness from the death of a fellow human being.
Indeed... This is already being discussed on at least
two other threads.
All I will say is that anyone wishing death on another human being - any human being - is beneath contempt.
I'll then invoke Stimpy's Law (q.v.) and gracefully withdraw from this thread.
All I'm saying here...
...is that I'm with Stimpy and Joe, one hundred percent, on this issue. And one more thing: did this really need its own thread, given that the "debate" is alive and well on the other ones?
I'm with the above fellows
I really dislike Thatcher and a lot of what she did and stood for. But I cannot, for one second, celebrate or find any cause for cheer in someone's death.
I'm glad it's not just me
and, I'll admit, there are plenty of people with more reason to despise her than me. It looks to me some people see Maggie as a free pass to stop being humane and compassionate.
As humane...
and compassionate as she was to the neediest?
Different levels
I'm not suggesting she was particularly humane and compassionate to the needy in any way, but this is a different matter. Though, as I've said before, I'm no fan, but I doubt she actively wished for the death of any of her subjects or would have celebrated their demise.
Perhaps not her subjects
but she was pretty chuffed about the sinking of the Belgrano.
I'm slightly torn about this. Emotionally I find the idea of the evil old swine popping her cogs worthy of a hearty cheer and I'm willing to bet those in the thread who are being particuarly sanctimonious are from the South East and were well shielded from what was going on in Scotland and the North of England.
Intellectually and ethically though, I recognise that its wrong to celebrate anyones death regardless of their heinous lives and that the emotional desire for revenge reduces us to the level of lynch mobs or the supporters of capital punishment.
She was utterly heinous though. And almost certainly certifiably insane in the latter years of her reign - TV footage viewed now makes her appear completely demented - particuarly when she started talking about herself as "we".
Ah the dilemma. A youth shorn of hope and optimism by her policies versus the desire to be a decent human being in adulthood.
What to do?
I just tutted. Audibly.
An otherwise reasonable post undermined by lazy locational stereotyping. The South East is not wall-to-wall landed gentry and stockbrokers.
I'm well aware of that
I worked in a psychiatric unit in Hackney for two years in the early nineties.
However, the Thatcherite miracle some pretend was so desperately required almost exclusively benefited the South East. Thats not sterotyping, its a fact. When I moved there from the west of Scotland I could scarcely believe the comparative levels of prosperity. It felt like I'd came to a very different, much richer country.
It's hard to believe anyone would waste much time on defending her had they been directly exposed to the horrors she created. Therefore, it was a reasonable shout that her more voiciferous fans are likely to reside in the area which benefited from her policies.
I'm not being nasty about South-Easteners- I'm good friends with many of them - but assuming that Thatcherites tend to come from there is hardly illogical, lazy or pandering to stereotypes.
I suppose I'm a bit touchy about this kind of thing
Throughout the Thatcher years, we lived in Surrey. My family was funded by my parents who worked in the public sector (education and nursing). When my mum became seriously ill, the NHS took three years to get the necessary heart operation organised.
Several times she nearly died while she was waiting, as more complications piled up to exacerbate her condition. On two occasions, she was prepared for surgery - only for it to be postponed without explanation for another indefinite period. Overall, it took 8 years to get her back to a reasonable state of health following a second bit of bypass surgery in 1987.
I take issue with opinions being undermined or even deemed sanctimonious just because it might come from someone in the South East who seemingly had a lovely time in the 80s. That's just ignorant. Sorry.
Nope
I'm really sorry for your personal experiences during the period but it's not really an argument.
Individual anecdotes don't really tell any kind of wider story. The South East benefitted economically from the Thatcher years when the rest of the country was in a state of collapse. The Tory Parties policies were designed to make this happen.
Again, I'm sorry about what happened with your mum, but I'm struggling to see the relevance to be honest.
You're not a Thatcher apologist. Quite the reverse. I have no idea why you responded in the first place.
Yep, it is
Using personal experience is something that generally should be avoided in political arguments I agree, but in this case it did help to illustrate the wider story i.e. what it was actually like to live in the South East for all of the Thatcher years.
I responded because despite my loathing of the woman, I am stopping short organising a mass wiping of arses with Maggie tea towels in front of her house on the day she dies. I think the damage is done and we need to move on. She's an irrelevant old bag. I would approve of Ivor Biggun singing a special song at the end of the news, but other than that, ideally I would like the event to be ignored.
She created a deeper economic north/south divide than was there before, there's no doubt about that. I suppose it all boils down to me not liking the broadness of your statement about the mindset of the people in the area that I come from.
If only she were irrelevant
Personally, I believe that the work a government or PM does is not simply restricted to their period of office. The way in which Thatcherism and Reaganomics changed things is still being felt today - it was their obsession with deregulation and total freedom for markets that subsequent leaders failed to rein in that led to the financial crash of a few years ago. Others will read recent history differently of course, but my feeling is that they set us on a course that was inevitably going to end in a crash.
I also feel she changed the national character. I was fortunate enough to interview John Peel at Peel Acres once and after we'd addressed the job in hand, I had a couple of hours in his company, during which time we came on to politics. We were talking about Thatcher and the north / south divide oddly enough, and I was boring him with some of the experiences of my family in the midlands - a slew of redundancies, forced early retirements, lengthy spells looking for work etc.
He talked about the personal tragedies of all of that and then said that the worst thing about her wasn't the straight economic cost. The real damage was that she coarsened the national character, made us less open, less sympathetic, less forgiving, more strident, and much more selfish. It's a comment that I've come back to again and again over the years as I sometimes find this country hard to recognise, and I think it's one of the best summings up of the lasting damage that she did that I've heard.
Would that she were an irrelevant old bag but she changed the course of the country, and that echoes down the years even now. Whether you were for her or against her, she was surely the most divisive PM since the war and as I posted somewhere else, that surely precludes her being considered a successful one.
I can almost hear his voice
Thanks for sharing that story.
Pleasure
I think I've still got the tape somewhere, but doubtless I switched it off before we got to the interesting stuff!
Don't agree
Sorry Moley, she didn't "make" "us" anything. I agree she heralded in a decade where ostentatious wealth in the City reigned supreme. But if people demonstrated a greedy grasping vile side it was there already. A politician can't "make" people behave against their wishes any more than they can "make" the greedy and selfish become nicer. See current banking management. People are people. Some are lovely and some are wankers. IMHO this is one of those lazy comments people make about the 80s along the lines of the 70s were all grey, music was terrible till punk etc etc. typically accompanied by TV clips with footage of braying herberts in braces drinking champagne. There were people like that - I worked with them - but they were like that already.
Agreed
She didn't directly "do" any of those things.
You could refine the statement to say that she helped fashion a cultural environment where those characteristics could flourish
Simple principle for me is
why would a rationale, sensible person want to sink to the level of someone they despised?
I agree
I would hope no-one would celebrate someones suffering or death, however, I would heartily celebrate the demise of her principles, her actions and their impact today...sadly it seems they will greatly out live her.
That’s not to say I don't hope that before her passing her conscience finally rises its head to show her what she did to the lives of hundreds.
Humane and compassionate...
... means actually doing something - not just posting an entry on a blog. If you haven't sent her a "get well soon" card or rang up the family to ask how she's doing, your humanity and compassion towards Thatcher (coz that's who we're talking about) counts for nothing.
Much as I hate to be pedantic
Humane: characterised by tenderness, compassion, and sympathy for people and animals, esp. for the suffering or distressed
Compassionate: having or showing compassion
Nothing in there that says I have to ring up Thatcher Towers to see if she found her breakfast palatable this morning.
I don't want to sound like I'm taking the moral high ground to act smug, but my original point still stands: if a fellow human being is suffering and/or dies, I'm not going to get an iota of pleasure from it, regardless of who it is.
Good work on...
... the pedantry - although I'm sure you realised the term "humane and compassion" was a link to your post. Just like you, I stand by my post - "humanity and compassion" means fuck all if the person who it is directed at doesn't know you're doing it.
25 years is a whole generation
Don't you think it might be time to just let it go?
Probably...
... but I'm a bit bored.
Me too
I don't usually read old Conservative Party manifestos in my spare time, honest.
So we've defined humane and compassionate
as verbs now? And a verb that seems to mean send a card. Oxfam must be delighted as it plays right to their strengths - a humane and compassionate charity with a full range of greetings cards.
As I see it, there are people hell bent on having a specific celebratory view on Thatcher and some that are saying this level of joy at someone dying lacks humanity and compassion.
And also
some that are using the 'humanity and compassion' angle as a way of deflecting criticism of the old bat. No, I don't mean you, specifically.
For what it's worth, though I loathe Thatcher and all her works, the fact is that she is already dead. The slow descent into dementia is not something I'd wish on anyone (I'm sure that most, if not all, of us will have seen it closer to home).
The sad, confused husk that remains is not the person responsible for the destruction of much that was decent in our society; that person is gone.
Stimpy Joe
Choked on vomit, didn't he?
I'm not 'wishing' death on anyone.
The woman's dying. I'm simply going to celebrate the fact she's dead once she HAS died. I think theres a difference.
Dying?
She's ill and apparently it's not too serious. The reports could be wrong but that's what they're saying currently.
And I don't think there is too much difference in wishing for someone to die and waiting for someone to die in order to celebrate her death.
Your opinion fella,
however I disagree. But I will add that this thread is slightly worrying. It seems you can be a right **** during your life but come your time of dying we must all show some respect. Sorry, if you want respect then don't be a **** in the first place! The world will be the better without her or her kind.
I'm not going to show her any respect
when she dies. But I'm not going to disrespect her either.
Wow...
... very effective.
Whereas opening a bottle,
dancing a jig and tramping down the dirt on a dead womans grave will make it all better?
Surely...
... it's "woman's". And I'd prefer a stomp to a jig.
Yep you're right.
but your argument seems to have diminished to grammar which says something.
I only got pedantic...
... because of your "verb" pedantry earlier on. Let's just agree to differ - you think it's wrong to celebrate someone's imminent death - whatever they've done in life - I don't.
OK
Shameful!
I have the same contempt for Gordon Brown and Tony Blair that many posters on this blog have for Margaret Thatcher. However, never ever would I celebrate their death.
We are better than this.
You think she shed a tear
for miner's family's and their communities? Or the wider working class? THATS why I'll be celebrating if its ok with you.
As A Person and PM...
...she showed total disregard for so many but as many have said It is never nice to see the decline of anyone going "gaga". Its the symbolism of what she and her like stand for that we should look forward to the death of.
As for the miners - I for one would never have gone down the pits but they served the communities that were decimated when nothing was put in their place.
If you want vitriol this is really up there!!
Didn't Hefner
do something very similar about 10 years ago?
Thatcher
Thanks to many of you for reinforcing my decision to avoid the internet for a fortnight in the aftermath of her death.
Death comes to us all.
And she's 85 and in poor health. I don't see any distaste in discussing her impending demise. As there was talk of a state funeral a while back, frankly I don't see how it can be avoided.
I can't help wondering....
...if the same extent of vitriol would be evident were we talking about the potential demise of 'Lord' Thatcher, i.e. if the same policies had been carried out by a man. Is part of the unique reaction that she elicits because we find it unsettling that a woman should 'snatch' milk from children, initiate (and see through) her economic policies, make the decision to retake the Falklands, sink the Belgrano etc?
Like others, I'm no fan, but I think that wishing someone dead says as much about me as the object of my wrath.
If the economic policies of a male prime minister...
...has resulted in the towns in the area where I was brought up ending up as desolate as they are now I'd say yes. Definately.
And in twenty years time, I'd suggest that Dave and Gid will most likely occupy exactly the same place in many people's hearts. Depends on the desolation which will result from today though. I have low hopes.
But were those changes
purely the result of Thatcher's policies?
Let's look at one example: shipbuilding (perhaps pertinent, given the Costello references above). Britain, and the Clyde above all, once led the world in this industry. Due to the devastation of much of mainland Europe after WWll, this continued up to the mid-1960s, as the UK yards remained in a serviceable condition. But this post-war boom was illusory. Once other areas of the world started to rebuild their industries, they did so with new technologies and without the same background of entrenched union/management disputes.
My point is, stuff happens. Glasgow was once the 'second city of the Empire' due to its massive manufacturing base, but nothing lasts forever. On the positive side, its sustained period as an economic powerhouse left it with some of the most impressive Victorian architecture anywhere, which has led to new opportunities through tourism and the creative industries. Some may sneer, but guess what - life ain't perfect, and it's sometimes a case of making the best of the circumstances we happen to find ourselves in.
For social democrats, Scandinavia is often seen as the role model, but comparisons are not as clear as they might at first seem. These countries had no massive industrial base like the UK had, so have not had to deal with the resulting social problems caused when those industries went into decline. Similarly, not having had empires to speak of, they are vastly more racially homogeneous. I should say immediately that I would much rather live (with certain caveats) with the diversity of the UK than in the blander, if more cohesive, world of Scandinavia. I'm just saying they have found the building of a so-called 'good society' infinitely easier, due to large historical forces rather than the actions of a particular prime minister.
Anyway, this was my attempt to move the debate on to less personal territory. Time will tell if it succeeds.
Even Norman Tebbit...
... has gone on record saying that he regrets the damage caused by the miners strike (even if fundamentally he still blames it on Scargill). That strikes me as an admission that tory policy in the 80's had a hand in the subsequent misery.
We remain the sixth largest economy in the world. We do not need to shaft the poor. Stuff does happen, but that's not an excuse to wreck lives deliberately. Particularly when the government has not been given a mandate to do so.
I am now off to fume somewhere. Possibly at lunchtime my ears will be popping with anger.
Manufacturing in the UK got wiped out by Geoffery Howe
- at least that was the first wave - but he isn't a hate figure any more because he started the process of her downfall with his resignation
There was doubtless a lot of inefficiency and waste in industry and industrial relations were shocking in the 70s - a great deal of blame on both sides of course but anyone who works in private industry as I do will know how diabolically poor British managers are as a breed.
But the Thatcherites had set themselves headlong to overturn the cosy post war consensus regardless - if you think they hated the working classes it was nothing compared to how much they hated One Nation Tories and MacMillan especially with his 'sentimental' ideas about the British working man and the responsibilities owed to them for their sacrifice (gained in SuperMac's case from the trenches in the First War).
All that 'homes for heroes' nonsense had to go... Thatcher HATED all that - and it was that she obviously just didn't care which has generated all this vitriol (I agree with the posts saying that any death is a tragedy and I won''t celebrate her death - I certainly won't be in mourning though)
And I keep raving on about this but the very worst thing - and which may actually have fucked us alogether - is that Thatcher government smashed the padlocks off the state in Big Bang and since then its been non-stop shameless looting. There's hardly a damn thing left to flog except some core state services - whcih ARE going to be sold off too. Everything is more expensive and less efficient and more highly subsidised as a result of privatisation and PFI.
The Thatcher economic miracle is bollock too - this country hasn't had three decades of prosperity its been a 30 year yard sale, at the end of which we're £1.2 trillion in debt, our manufacturing and all the associated intellectual property and control broken up , flogged cheap, shut down or shipped overseas - and the banks are completely in control of the money supply. Whitehall 'picked a winner' in the financial services sector which DOES NOT CREATE WEALTH - it generates money but it does this by taking a cut of money moving around. The banks take money right out of the productive economy and that's precisely what is going to happen with all the money the government will stop spending on services and divert to paying the banks on the debt - to a very large degree the same banks and institutions that we dug out of the shite with hundreds of billions of pounds of our money.
It wasn't inevitable that all the wealth creation should leave the UK. Manufacturers in this country are targets for the banks with debt used as the battering ram - even if the firms can get funding. British companies are run by accountants who understand nothing other than glorified asset stripping - that list of industry leaders who supported the cuts was instructive - almost every single one exporters of jobs, importers of cheap shite and debt
Why Blair and Brown went along with this god alone knows - though Blair's personal wealth might be a clue
I've been to Stockholm
And I suppose as a capital city, it may not be representative of an entire region. But its spread of ethnicity looked pretty diverse to me.
I can't speak for all of Scandinavia
but as a swede I have to say that your comments are rooted in stereotypical misconceptions.
I'm not that interested in political discussions, and wouldn't have posted on this thread on the subject of Thatcher, because I don't know anything about her first hand as an outsider looking in on british politics.
But since you brought up my country, I feel obligated to correct some of your statements.
a) Plenty of examples of declining industries and the problems caused by that here too over the years. Of course not on the scale of british industries, but then there's only around nine million of us.
b) Racially homogeneous ? That was a long time ago, since WW2 a steady stream of refugees have been given a new home in Sweden, and people like my grandparents and my mother came to Sweden to work in the industries that created the countrys post-war wealth.
This election a bunch of neanderthals calling themselves "Sweden Democrats" ( now that's just language abuse! ) got enough votes to sneak into the swedish parliament, through racist propaganda combining islamophobia ( they made an election commercial where a bunch of burka clad women was following an OAP clutching her zimmerframe in fear! ) and the classic "they're taking your jobs"-rhetoric, obviously working well with the unemployed ex-industry workers...among others. Anyway, bland is not the word.
c) It wasn't as easy to build the `good society´ as you seem to think ( the workers in Ådalen would tell you so if they hadn't been shot down ), and it took a very long time and a couple of clever leaders to get there. And for the past four years the conservative alliance have been working to tear down a lot of it, selling out everything not nailed down and dismantling just about every safety net in place; all of course in the name of "freedom".
But in every article ( in the foreign press )we are still referred to as a "socialist" country. Don't get me wrong, I don't view them as the devil and can appreciate some of the things they have done ( and the Socialdemocrats are not the party that they once were so they're not necessarily the good guys either ). But I grieve for the society I grew up in, if not 100% `good´ at least with ambitions to get there.
Now it's every man and woman for themselves, no solidarity, no pity for less fortunate ( well they're probably lazy sods eh ? )
Oh dear. I really hate talking politics. And I'm sure you're not that interested in swedish politics so I wasn't going to write a long thesis about it ( I don't really know enough in detail anyway ) but I guess I got a little carried away...sorry!
As you were...
Oh- kay...
now I feel like the guy in the queue behind Woody Allen...
Sorry
I didn't mean to bash you over the head and give you a pompous lecture in front of the Massive...:)
Cheer up, I'm sure you'll get the opportunity to show me up on some other subject soon enough!
Oh not this again
*huge Bagpuss-style yawn*
Maybe once upon a time
there would be some merit in this vitriol. Lord knows, for personal reasons, I could very easily justify such a response, but the lady is very old, frail and, judging from news reports, confused. Surely, this response is just undignified and below us? Surely, to quote the metaphysical poet George Herbert (and REM) "Living well is the best revenge"
Yep
Put it this way. If Thatcher thought the working classes were scum, why prove her right?
Put a bit more
succinctly than me LS, but I'm not arguing with your sentiment
It's revenge for all of the football threads!
;-)
Football
The iron lady didn't have much time for football supporters. See, there's some common ground for you.
There Is No Such Thing As Society
really ?
No fan of Thatcher
and understand the bile people feel towards her, though the irony of rich musicians and comedians manning the barricades never fails to amuse (The Specials and The Beat are excused for the brilliance of their tunes though). It wasn't them that suffered, they actually did rather well and the communities that did suffer from her harshness haven't exactly thrived under subsequent governments, have they ?
So many Thatcher apologists
on possibly the best music forum in the land.
It's official: Punk really is dead :-(
Really?
It's a big leap from 'people who think it's wrong to revel in the death of a human being' to 'Thatcher apologist'.
Of course it is
But on this thread (and the other similar one) there are more than a few who have attempted to fight her corner (which they are perfectly entitled to do, of course).
You've got confused
Reading what you've said above, it sounds like you're saying you're upset to find people who disagree with your views. Music (and media in general) has a fairly high proportion of lefties, but there'll be Tories and right-wing people posting here too you know
And a few well balanced ones!
You don't have to be a Tory or a right winger (and I am neither) to disagree with the bile spewing contingent. Just read a bit of history of the late 60s and 70s to see that Thatcher became an inevitability following the years of industrial conflict and genuine attempts to bring down the government, even when the Unions were invited in to dictate priorities. Shirly Williams' failed attempt to find a better way of resolving conflict than mass striking means Thatcher or someone like her was inevitable. A bit of humanity and realism in this discussion would be good but highly unlikely I think as the positions and emotions are too firmly entrenched.
Point of pedantry
It was Barbara Castle with "In Place of Strife" that I think you're refering to, not Shirley Williams. And yes, it was a missed opportunity.
Fair cop
You're quite right! Rushed response.
Missed opportunity
Barbara Castle - in place of strife.
It was the rejection of this that meant Thatcherism was always going to happen.
The union leaders of the day should have been pelted with rotten fruit.
Absolutely.
It should not come as a shock that a creature with such extreme views should engender an equally extreme and opposite reaction.I do not take any pleasure at all in the suffering of any living thing but I have to admit that my compassionate nature is brought under duress when I am expected to show tenderness towards a person who through their actions has laid low so many of my fellow citizens.I really am trying not to let fly on this one because I believe I am better than that,I detest the woman and everything she stands for,but I do not wish suffering upon her because I believe I am better than THAT as well.
Good Lord!
Tories? Here?
Is there a dedicated Phil Collins, Dire Straits and Three Tenors section just for them? ;-)
Didn't you see the latest issue
A Phil Collins piece, just for you ;-)
Torys
Yeah we're allowed as well here ain't we?
Heartwarming to see
Thatcher's education cuts are still paying dividends after all these years. ;-)
Punk is dead?
Finally! Thank fuck for that. I'm just off to dance on its...
Oh.
I've got a bottle
of glue in the fridge. Coming round for a celebratory snifter?
I'm
trying to work out how being a "Thatcher apologist" equates to punk being dead. Thatcher came to power in '79. Never seen it written that 1979 was The Year Punk Broke.
Talking of punk,
it shouldn't be forgotten that said phenomenon (such as it was) occurred during a time of now unimaginable state generosity towards the lazy and feckless / economically disenfranchised (again, delete according to taste). Not quite suggesting that the Lydons and Strummers et al were ungrateful bastards...well alright I am suggesting just that ;-)
Celebrating death
Celebrating death (in this way) = bad karma. Surely?
Then again, perhaps you should never trust a hippy.
Bien-pensant-ery: a win-win situation
One gets to feel the warm glow of righteousness that comes from Thatcher-bashing, while simultaneously enjoying the lifestyle that her policies helped to bring about. Nice one. The Red Wedge fraternity exhibit this tendency as much as anyone.
Lest my comments may be misconstrued as me trying to hold on to my privileged lifestyle, let me state for the record that I'm from a very ordinary council house upbringing in West Central Scotland. Worked for many years in low-ish paid jobs and have now attained the dizzy heights of bang on the average wage. Willing to bet that more than a few Thatch-bashers are 'considerably richer than me'. Just saying.
Maybe there are some hypocrites about...maybe
I posted lower down that I don't think Conservatism is essentially an evil or indefensible approach to the world - not in the slightest.
Equally, just because you aren't actually stuck at home on the bones of your arse doesn't disqualify you from having strong opinions on the antics of the moneyed classes - that's a logical fallacy surely?
(Though I do agree with a few posts recently pointing out how ferociously capitalist the music industry is - obviously you can separate the experience of listening to music from its purchase but for something so dependent on image, "rock'n'roll outlaws" is by an large a contradiction in terms)
I really don't think we have experienced 'prosperity' anyway - we've spent 30 years furiously flogging off everything not nailed down and at the same time run up colossal debts and filled our houses with shite
John Donne said....
“Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in Mankind; And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”
Even he may have thought twice about that tyrant lover Maggie though.
Since you mention tyrant-lovers...
how about recent Word cover star, national treasure blah blah blah Robert Wyatt, with his 1980 cover of Stalin Wasn't Stallin'?
When this song was written in the 1940s, it may have had some merit as an acknowledgement of a 'marriage of convenience', but to repeat it decades later, when it was perfectly obvious that Stalin had overseen one of the most repressive and murderous regimes in history...
Still, he had his heart in the right place, uncle Joe, eh? As ex-communist, now fully cured, Alexei Sayle said recently, 'you can't make an omelette without killing 20m people in the gulags'. Indeed.
But...
This is a thread about Maggie isn't it? I quite agree that Stalin was a murderous thug but that doesn't excuse Maggies support for other monsters does it?
No, it just gives it more context.
You and others make a fair point that, in your opinion, Thatcher's support for Pinochet puts her beyond the pale. I just think if we're working to these exacting moral standards where international relations are concerned we need to see the whole picture. But in a world where it's acceptable for 'progressive' people to make statements like 'we're all Hamas now', all bets are off.
But in what might be called "our democratic compact"...
...Margaret Hilda represented all of us, as the duly elected Prime Minister ... the Tory voters across Britain, the Labour and Alliance voters who didn't want her, the Nationalists in Scotland and Wales, the people who believed in the programmes of the leftist fringe parties and even both sides of the divide in Northern Ireland...
Given the rules, she was the representative leader for everyone on the electoral register, whether you voted SDLP in Derry or Conservative in Worthing ... Consequently everything she did, she did in our name (just as Blair did in his ten year tenure) ... whereas Uncle Joe, General Pinochet and all the other [music reference ahoy, Ed] "glitterati" from the Fletcher Memorial Home for "incurable tyrants and kings" were acting under different compacts - their validity open to question of course - with different peoples ...
She was a radical with a loyalty not to the broad constituency of "the British people" but only to "people like us" and she bugged the hell out of the rest of the country who weren't "people like us" ...
PS: my spark of dislike for the person has long died ... I sometimes even wonder if Britain wouldn't have gone through some similar change in the '80s, as globalisation took hold, the structure of international financial services developed and the Cold War stuttered to its conclusion ... I'll reserve my ire at the moment for the likes of Blunkett and Straw writing in the Guardian, Eric Joyce MP dissing Iain Banks in the Guardian, and the intellectual deficiencies of Cameron & Osbourne ...
Conservatism ...
... is not morally or intellectualy indefensible at all. Before the Spectator turned into a lifestyle accessory for thick nasty Sloane Londoners I used to really enjoy reading it. Ditto the 'old' Telegraph.
I do think that there is a difference though in dressing up massive wholesale theft with talk of 'honest working folk who just want to be left to get on with their lives'. Thatcher & co did precisely that.
The banks have driven up in pantechnicons and are expecting us to pay the meter, hold the door for them and applaud them as they drive off with our stuff. She set it all in motion. But like the man said a few posts up, living well is probably the best revenge -
Have you heard yourself?
Your generalisations are ludicrous.
It's so black and white
Working class = good
Middle class = evil
FFS
I'm not saying that at all
Not sure who you mean is saying it either? I'm pretty much middle class - whtever that means. I've been banging on about wealth creation and manufacturing and the banks, not the dictatorship of the proletariat.
the Thatcher government was on an idelogical crusade and one of their key aims was to get revenge for the Ted Heath years. I think they did have it in for the working class.
don't know what that would mean now but we're all going to be poorer for a long time - unless we work in the City
Hang on
Thatcher and Heath loathed each other and indeed Heath was treated with contempt by the later Tory grandees. I think they thought Heath was part of the 1970s problem.
Yes - and indeed no
In a very real sense.
I know what you mean but Heath said - 'Who Runs The Country' in the first 74 election - the answer appeared to be - the miners. Its that which I think the Thatherites were out to revenge, though you're right they did indeed hate Heath (mind you they also hated Churchill for giving in to the railway workers in the 1950s, a lot of hate to go around from that crowd)
Hang on, I'm confused
These are the 1983 election results:
So the Dark Lady of the Sith's votes must be those little pockets of red, right?
In my defence
I wasn't born in 1983 :-)
Though more people voted Labour
We live under a system of representative government not a democracy.
It was similarly uneven in 1997 but the other way.
I was a lot happier in 97 than 83! - though I feel very dubious about NuLabur now..
Eh?
1983 General Election
Tories: 13,012,316 (42.4% vote share)
Labour: 8,456,934 (27.6% vote share)
I call that a walloping. Labour got pwned, as I hear the kids say.
Oops sorry wrong election
And another oops sorry here too
Point of order Mr Speaker
The third party - Lib/SDP alliance - got 7,780,949 (25.4%), which following the Great Patriotic War and with Labour a shambles still means 53% of those who voted for the 3 main parties didn't want her.
If only Labour and the Alliance could have formed a coalition....except they hated each other more than the Tories.
How do you pronounce pwned by the way?
Political Alliances?
Would never work, just get two lots of c#nts running the country.
oops.
I know - I'm buggered if I know
how to vote in the PR referendum either.
Ta for that Joe
she's still alive and now I feel flippin old
sorry
Archie, I'm a little slow. what point does this make?
Simply that...
thirteen million twelve thousand three hundred and sixteen graves is going to be an awful lot of dirt to tramp down, not to mention the three years' worth of the entire production of Moët et Chandon that you'll have to keep on ice to toast their presumably long-awaited demise.
Or do you think she did it all on her tod?
I can't talk for others, but
if you look at my post here, you will see I am not gong to be dancing on her grave. She never got my support, but I would never say that those who did vote for her were culpable for the choices she made in power. Actually, truth be told I still don't see the logic in the argument.
She made very few choices...
that hadn't been announced up front in the corresponding election manifesto. Castrating the unions, increased defence spending, control of inflation even if it was at the expense of employment, widespread privatisation, slashing top-tier tax rates, kick-starting a property boom (including council-house sales), a "competitive and efficient" coal industry... they're all in there.*
Of course, it's more comforting - it makes it easier for us to live with ourselves and our neighbours - to point a finger at The Greate Lacquer'd Beaste and claim that an ingenuous nation was betrayed, had the wool pulled over its eyes and didn't cotton on to what it was in for. Comforting, but unfortunately not true.
Britain reaped what she sowed, yes, but only after we had willingly bought her the packet of properly labelled seeds. She put forward a clear set of policies, the electorate voted her in to put them into practice and that's exactly what she did. With no flip-flopping (or, as she put it, no turning ladies) and with all the attendant consequences that she and she alone is not only blamed for, but reviled to the extent that - 25 years on - quite a lot of otherwise perfectly nice, reasonable people have no compunction about wishing a doolally old lady dead.
(*Even things like the War of Wapping were flagged well in advance: "We[...] will resist further moves towards [the closed shop] in the newspaper industry" - 1979 manifesto.)
Actually, Archie
If you look here , You will see that the Conservatives became more and more unpopular until the game changing Falklands crisis in April 1982 - at one point MT was the most unpopular PM up to that point ever. So, I still don't buy this "we are to blame" argument: as pointed out above, lots of people didn't vote for her in 1979 (55% of those who voted according to MORI).
On another point
It was those two governments of the early 1980s who sowed the seeds for the spiralling numbers on sickness benefits that the current government are trying to tackle now.
On several occasions her government changed the way in which the unemployment figures were counted simply because the real number - ie the way they used to count them at the time of those "Labour Isn't Working" posters - was too horrific to countenance, which was why she was the most unpopular PM ever somerwhere around 1981. One of the key methods of doing it was to shuffle people across from dole to sickness benefit.
I'm not saying that the issue of people claiming invalidity benefit when they can work shouldn't be addressed - in a considered fashion rather than with a machete mind - but it's worth remembering just how it was that the numbers started steepling.
if folks feel so horrid
if folks feel so horrid about Thatch, they must really be batey about Blair. And as for Mugabe, the leaders of China of North Korea - crikey, they are in for a hard time from cross lefties given how those leftish leaders hurt their people.
Thatch liberated many working class Brits. What the left passionately hate about her is that she pulled the carpet from their complacent certainties about who 'their' people were, and cracked much of the previous tribalism of politics, Union bombast, etc.
Telling people of a socialist of leftish disposition..
.. to sod off back to Harare, North Korea, Moscow - might weed out some 'useful idiots' as Stalin called them but it seems worth saying it was a socialist that wrote 1984. Only a fool supports a tyrant, xenophobe or crook who mouths a couple of platitudes about a left or right wing ideology. Or should I be tarring all right wingers with the Tea Party Nutter label? I don't think that for a second and the reverse isn't true either.
The Thatcherites certainly smashed the 'Crsy Post War Consensus (TMFTL) - as they set out to do - they also initiated the huge plunder of the UK state that is going to result in some form of massive depression/crisis in the coming year or two. That's worth having strong feelings about either way and its hardly knee jerk frustration at all the former tame left wing votes waking up to the pure truth of free market capitalism.
Blair attracts real hatred because of the way the Iraq war was started and prosecuted - and for grovelling to the banks
And if you want to know who 'your' people are, unless you are a wealthy banker I would suggest that's everyone pretty much in the country - I hope the banks can struggle by with parting with 0.04% tax on the money that they have gouged from the rest of us, or that one or two of them sign up to a code of conduct whereby they promise to have a think about not colluding in massive systematic tax evasion
80s throwback
Takes me back. "You on the left ? At least to the left of me ? See that Kim Jong-il, hereditary dictator ? That's you that is.". I await evidence of the non-gibbering left's support of Zimbabwe or the laughingly-named Democratic People's Republic of Korea with great interest. There is such a thing as moderation in debate : it is absurd to align your opponents with extremists and murderers as if they are somehow representative examples. Even Morrissey doesn't compare meat-eaters with Jeffrey Dahmer (unless the Massive tell me differently).
As for Mrs Thatcher liberating many of the working classes, then yes, perhaps, but she liberated many others from actually working, freed them from the tiresome fripperies of self-respect, dignity and comfort. I was signing on during the mid-80s as industries were ravaged and still remember seeing all these family men in their forties with no hope at all. Fathers of some of my contemporaries never got a comparable job again. Yesterday when Mr. Osbourne was going on about getting rid of half a million jobs but how the private sector would fill in the gap. Like it did last time. Aye, right. Later, when I did become employed, inevitably heading south, it was salutary to see recovery in the south-east but this recovery only slowly heading north. It was another ten years before Scotland had anything like recovery.
Still, if I declined to crow over Mrs Thatcher in the earlier post before it is because, like Helena Handcart, I have skipped down the street bellowing "Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead " when she booted out, and while I can still remember the 80s and get sniffy of Blairesque cries to Move On, it has been twenty years, and there are new fish to fry. There is scary stuff again, right now, and so reliving the battles of the past instead of the now and fetishising Thatch is going to appear increasingly to be an indulgence.
I don't understand
the vitriol.
'Thatcher' died on the ding-dong-the-witch-is-dead night that she was driven out of Downing Street.
There's something sad about celebrating the death of the old, ailing granny she is now.
I'm directing my negative thoughts at the 6th form debating society that's currently in charge.
Thatcher
We used to be an Empire & we had an Emporour
Then we were a kingdom, & we had a king,
Then we were a country..... & we had Thatcher
I do not wish her dead, but I won't shed a tear.
I was a student in Belfast during the early 1980s, probably the last generation to enjoy free third level education, and for a while I suppose I could gladly have seen her swinging from a lamp post. Certainly I collected money for the miners, filled my student flat with CND posters and decried the siting of US nuclear weapons in the UK, but even at the time those things all happened somewhere else.
In Northern Ireland Thatcher was and remains a contentious figure for different reasons. She was a hate figure for the nationalist / republican students on campus because of her handling of the hunger strike. Later she became the bete noir of the unionists as she side-lined them and pressed on with the Anglo-Irish Agreement despite massive popular opposition.
What should not be overlooked is that that latter act - which I suspect was entirely contrary to her instincts in that it gave another state a nominal role in internal UK affairs - was an early and necessary first step towards the peace settlement that now exists here. Ironically it is perhaps the one thing that in my eyes should be entered in the plus column. Either way, it all seems a very long time ago.
As for her broader, longer term legacy, well ... all grown up and sitting in my own house with broadband, Sky+, and the various other trappings of the early 21st century I am not sure I am either qualified or objective enough to judge.
Iron Lady Gaga?
I have nothing to add to the thread, but I just wanted to type that.
Does this mean
that we get to poke her face?
Coat.
I like Jo Brand's line
that once Thatcher became 'Lady Thatcher', she couldn't be taken seriously because she sounded like a device for removing unwanted pubic hair.
Maggie did lots of good things.
And also a lot of very bad ones. A great deal of the bad ones came about because she didn't know when to stop with one of the good things and sacked anyone who disagreed with her.
She also seemed to be completely lacking in empathy. For anyone.
A strange, strange lady.
I hated milk at school
it was always left on the window sill in the sun and got hot. She got rid of that milk therefore she's a saint in my eyes, I really, really hated that milk.
Dave Amitri
Political Correspondent
The Word
It was always,
as you say, hot, and also in pyramidal cartons iirc...
Nope we had the
little 1\3 pint glass bottles in my day. Eee, it were grand, rowing boat cross lake etc
Yes, one third of a pint
bottles and we had to collect the foil bottle tops for guide dogs for the blind, as I recall.
Certain kids with a craving for power, but no real leadership skills, were invariably given the important job of Milk Monitor.
I was a milk monitor
I only lobbied for the position so that I could abuse my power by missing out my desk when I distributed the cartons foul luke-warm cow excretion. I was also open to bribes from others to do the same when I got to them.
Glass bottles? They would never have been allowed
where I came from...
Keith Joseph
smiles and a baby dies in a box on Beasley Street....
Just want to say
she was a Odious old hag with equally obnoxious offspring. I recall the interview that Carol Thatcher had with the mothers of the Argentinian sailors lost when the Belgrano was sunk. Yes we can all justify actions in war but her disdain for these people several years after the event was mind boggling. So, yes I can easily understand the rejoicing at her passing when it occurs although I equally understand these emotions are neither clever nor commendable. The one i really felt sorry for was Denis - fancy being married to that old cow.
Why...
do you use only age- and sex-specific epithets ("old hag" and "old cow") to express your disapproval of her policies?
If it's not a sign of underlying and perhaps unwitting sexism but just an unthinking manner of speaking, would you consider it equally acceptable to unthinkingly refer to Leon Brittan as a "fat Jew".
(Shakes head in amazement, not for the first time in this thread.)
Sorry Archie but
I bloody hated that milk and felt something had to be said.
is
Demented Bint nmore fitting
As Peter Cook once said
When I say that ghastly woman, i don't call her ghastly just cos she's a woman, and I don't call her a woman, just because she is ghastly. But she IS a woman and she IS ghastly
Personality
Whatever you think of her politics, the main reason so many people despise is that she came over as such a horrible person; intolerant and contemptuous of anybody who didn't agree with her, and always looking to demonise any group of people she believed were not 'One of us'.
It's fair enough to argue with those who worship her, but I'm inclined to say that we shouldn't gloat over her demise, as it's in bad taste.
That being said, I remember when Robert Maxwell - another thoroughly odious megalomaniac - fell of his yacht, and 99% of the country didn't stop laughing for a week.
For those who
like to keep their finger on the pulse (so to speak):
http://www.isthatcherdeadyet.co.uk/
To paraphrase or mangle...
...David Baerwald's dedication on Triage (I think it was) "to Reagan, Thatcher [and the rest], in the sincere hope there is a god, and He is vengeful beyond all comprehension".
For me, she's just a cipher of a mind-set that is still there, and the world seems to lurch to ever more Murdoch-inspired extremes. Him and those tea party-funding drongos.
As Usual...
The Daily Mash etc.
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/thatcher-gaining-strength-from-nation's-misery-201010223185/
Thatcher 'death' website condemned as vulgar
claims Daily Mail
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1323596/Margaret-Thatcher-death-...
And they are wearing it like a badge of honour
I'd like to wear one of them
Magaret Thatcher
I know I will offend some, but here goes. Mrs Thatcher, bless her, was a great Prime Minister who saved the UK from itself after the two governments preceding her failed in their attempts to govern in the teeth of union opposition. I do not agree with all things Thatcher and will happily admit that she became a bit batty by the end, but she did us all a great service and deserves our gratitude and respect. Even socialist commentators like Andrew Marr rate her as an outstanding prime minister. To all those who deride her, please ask themselves what great service they have done for their country and whether it compares to hers!
Happy Days
If I do absolutely nothing
for my country, ever, I'll still be ahead of the game when compared to Thatcher.
Thatcher - again!
She created an economy where there was a lack of investment in the people of this country. A difficulty that is still so prevalent today in our education and health services - without mentioning our road networks.
She did create a safe economy for the financial institutions though as communities were destroyed in one fell swoop. Then that which she was responsible for such as the mis- selling of endowment mortgages and disrupting of Company Pension schemes were all found to be in need of correction several years later. Meanwhile, certain financial institution heads were able to leave their posts on the back of the newly accrued wealth. All of this without mentioning the privatisation programmes that have been shown to create short term wealth on only an initial scale to those in the know.
The classic weapon to the working class was the sale of council houses. In one fell swoop those very people who could take the bulk of industrial action were committed to their mortgage providers that were always ready to kick you out of your home when payments were missed. Something that local councils were more flexible in their attitude to.
She also invested heavily in the Territorial Army in case they were needed to supplement Police Forces as they suppressed potential strikers. Great that would have been the working class versus working class.
Her attitude for government spread through industry and where there had previously been constructive negotiation and consultation with the trade unions, this was replaced by management structures based on exclusion. This ultimately led to a lack of productivity issues that were never resolved resulting in many firms 'going to the wall'.
All of this and no mention of the Poll Tax. Just remember it wasn't the voters who got rid of her, but her own political party.
Well said sir
and in response to harrogate andrew, the one great thing I have done for my country was never voting for Thatcher.
thatcher was
a rubbish defender who was never worth 5mil.