Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

That George Michael True Faith "reimagining" in part

Cadabra's picture

It's... err... different!

0

If by different

you mean awful I'd agree. I couldn't get past the first 45 seconds

0
Humphrey Plugg | 9 March 2011 - 1:45pm

Cobblers

0
Brookster | 9 March 2011 - 1:56pm

Ghastly

Death by Auto-Tune

2
Simon Ford | 9 March 2011 - 1:56pm

Two words

Craig David

0
Leedsboy | 9 March 2011 - 2:18pm

can

i get a remand

2
DogFacedBoy | 9 March 2011 - 3:52pm

Y'know what....

I quite like it in a james Blake kind of way

'runs for cover'

1
art vanderlay | 9 March 2011 - 2:27pm

It's certainly interesting

I'm not sure about it, but I admire anyone willing to do something so different so far into their career.

What I would say, however, is that this single is for Comic Relief. Surely, the best thing you can do then, is to make a song which is going to appeal to the largest number of people and sell the most amount of records. If George Michael wants to explore this new avenue, then that's fine, but I think he's being a bit selfish here by not giving the people what they want.

3
Joe R | 9 March 2011 - 2:32pm

Leaves me cold....literally

Autotune....ugh.

1
Dr Volume | 9 March 2011 - 2:44pm

Slow,

dull, weird.

0
sirbriancannonhunter | 9 March 2011 - 2:44pm

It does sound like it is the work

of someone who enjoys a toke or two.

0
Leedsboy | 9 March 2011 - 3:56pm

you'd have to smoke a shedload

enough to make you crash your car into your local shops. I dare say at that moment it might sound good

0
Nick Duvet | 10 March 2011 - 4:36am

May I be the first to announce....

dear oh dear that's just wrongity wrong. No excuses just plain dull and sad. Shame really because he's done some cracking stuff in the past but most of his output after "Outside" has been plodding and unfun ( don't think this is a word but you get the meaning I hope ).

0
fopeyducker | 9 March 2011 - 4:02pm
Pax Romana | 9 March 2011 - 4:34pm

Well...

Kudos for doing something different with it; there's nothing more pointless than a straight cover of a well known song.

The auto-tune is not only horrible but redundant.

And it makes me think of this:

0
Fraser M | 9 March 2011 - 4:41pm

Autotune isn't always bad

0
DogFacedBoy | 9 March 2011 - 4:58pm

Actually reminds me

mostly of this:

0
Cadabra | 9 March 2011 - 5:49pm

Dreadful, dreadful, dreadful

It actually makes me want to punch my own ears off. I would donate to Comic Relief not to have to ever hear it again.

1
hazeyjane | 9 March 2011 - 6:04pm

I'd heard rumours of this tunes grimness

and people weren't wrong. Not only is the voice manipulation annoying the whole things just a bit dull. Also I'm not a big fan but isn't the main part of George's attraction his voice? Shame because a laid back ibza friendly version of the song could be good .
No doubt it will sell by the shed load just to prove us all wrong which seeing as it's for comic relief I wouldn't mind too much.

0
Chris G | 9 March 2011 - 6:07pm

I actually really quite like it

...once I can actually hear the tune. But then I think the original is one of New Order's most irritating tunes, never liked it all that much, and I'm particularly fond of them.

It could have been saved by not using the effect vocal too much and mixing it with a normally recorded vocal, especially on the choruses.

It reminds me a little of some of the more out there moments by the Super Furries....

2
SimonL | 9 March 2011 - 8:40pm

Super Furries

I presume you mean something like Juxtaposed With U?
The thing about that is Gruff doesn't use the Vocoder all the way through, he lets his real voice through on the chorus and it resolves itself, plus he did that track ten years ago before Robo-voices were as ubiquitous and cliched as they are now.

I suppose I'll say one thing for the track, it is relentlessly cold and gloomy, far more so than anything New Order ever did...that's an achievement of sorts.

0
Dr Volume | 9 March 2011 - 11:52pm

I don't know what they were feeding him...

in the nick, but whatever it was has made his voice go well funny.

I lasted 33 seconds. It is unlistenable bullshit.

0
Patrick Crowther | 9 March 2011 - 8:46pm

Actually not as bad as I was expecting...

I quite like the slow arrangement, and I don't even mind the effect on the voice. All his other records have his normal voice, and there's plenty of those.

What spoilt it for me was his 'soulful' mucking about with the tune. I think if he'd actually sung the real melody, at least most of the time, it would have been more successful.

1
Specs_Beard | 9 March 2011 - 9:11pm

On first listening, I thought it was a load of old wank.

But, having given it another earing or two, I've changed my mind. I now think it's a load of fucking old wank.

And is that Autotune/Melodyne, a Vocoder or something else entirely?

1
Lenny Law | 9 March 2011 - 10:58pm

My version is better.

(And my version is well shit.)

I still like George, though.

0
Adman | 9 March 2011 - 11:20pm

i can't stand it...

and it needs more cowbell.

1
ivan | 9 March 2011 - 11:44pm

Sparko's Magic Piano...

There might be an interesting cover buried under the ridiculous autotune, I quite like his phrasing for instance and the harmony bit at the start.

But it's obviously an odd production. It sounds like something you might do if you'd found an effect and were testing it out. I've also seen it attributed to late-night-not-entirely-sober mucking about (which wouldn't be unimaginable in his case). These are experiments not things you release to much fanfare as a comeback single.
Also, whether you like his work or not, one thing George Michael is capable of doing is singing. In tune. So why this?

I don't know but it made me think two things.
One is that his well publicised drug hijinks might not be kind to a man's pipes. I sort of doubt he's damaged his voice but it might have become rougher and he may not want to draw attention to this on a comeback single.

The other thought occured while I pondered what a missed opportunity this was - it could have been a very emotional, loaded response to the WMUBYG-GH's recent misfortunes. just look at the first verse:

"I feel so extraordinary
Something's got a hold on me
I get this feeling I'm in motion
A sudden sense of liberty
I don't care 'cause I'm not there
And I don't care if I'm here tomorrow"

(apologies, this is probably going to go very sub-Michael Gray and pretentious, but I'm no writer)

So something's made the singer feel all funny and nice and 'liberated' - so much so that he feels removed from the rest of the world ('I'm not there') and isn't concerned with the future or consequences. Resonance?

I'd never given them much thought before, but hearing them sung by an extremely famous man with an extremely well-publicised drug habit/problem who has done some quite self-destructive (and front-bumper-destructive) things and has recently separated from a long-term partner...gives one pause. There are more interesting and possibly relevent lines later in the song but you get the idea.

In this light the decision to 'hide' the vocal intrigues me more. 'New' or unconfident singers often like to put effects (double-tracking or distortion etc) on recorded vocals, it makes it sound less like 'themselves' (almost everyone hates the way their voice sounds the first time they hear it recorded). Possibly, having chosen a song which is (or could be interpreted as being) so confessional, he's got cold feet and the autotune is way of distancing himself from the sentiments. It's not 'him' singing them. It's Sparky's Magic Piano.

1
sam and janet e... | 9 March 2011 - 11:48pm

I wouldn't read to much

into Bernard Sumner's lyrics.

This is the man who wrote "Love is the cure for every evil, love is the air that supports the eagle"

and

"...To buy a drink there is so much more reasonable, I think I'll go there when it gets seasonable"

and the none-more Spinal Tap:

"But out there the world is a beautiful place
With mountains, lakes and the human race"

I could go on.

(I am a fan by the way)

1
Dr Volume | 10 March 2011 - 3:56am

Theives Like Us

That song is a brilliant instrumental but Barney poos all over it with a god-awful vocal and terrible lyrics. It sounds like he made up the words as he went along. My favourite bit (if that's the word) is:

"...and it cuts your life
Like a broken knife"

0
Austin | 10 March 2011 - 4:13am

And lest we forget:

Every second counts, when I am with you,
I think you are a pig, you should be in a zoo

Which is such a nuanced disquisition on relationship entropy that it wouldn't look out of place on Blood On The Tacks.

0
Pax Romana | 10 March 2011 - 12:37pm

To be fair

he does crack up laughing at the crapness of his own lyric. They didn't bother to re-record another take.

0
Dr Volume | 11 March 2011 - 1:02am

Indeed he's not much of a

Indeed he's not much of a lyricist (although I do think True Faith is quite a decent stab) but again, that's why I think this is a missed opportunity. The K/PWARSH's 'substance abuse turmoil' could have given substance (heh) to the lyric.

It may sound fanciful, but handled the right way it could have been like Johnny Cash's 'Hurt' cover (although I think True Faith's lyric is actually better source material).

0
sam and janet e... | 10 March 2011 - 7:29pm

You may have a point

about the current vocal ability of the IWYSH. I saw one of his gigs on Sky last year and he was constantly holding the microphone towards the audience to sing-along, most noticeably at the tricky bits.

As with Robbie Williams, I wouldn't be too chuffed if I'd paid through the nose to watch someone perform their hits and they expected me to do half the singing. I think Lee Mack touched on this once:

"Come on Glastonbury, you know the words!"
"You're right, Robbie, we do, and we also paid £130 to see you. Would you mind perhaps singing them for us?"

0
Joe R | 10 March 2011 - 10:29am

Oh. Dear

Much as it is to be applauded that someone is trying something new and a bit different for them, it shouldn't blind us to the fact that this is really not very good. A miserable, auto tuned deathly noise made by a man whose mojo is seemingly rapidly vanishing in his rear view mirror (and not because he's reversed over it)

A pity, as I kind of like him, and he's done things of merit in the past. But there you go

0
illuminatus | 10 March 2011 - 11:46am

Sadly...

...George Michael hasn't done anything decent for years. I adored Listen Without Prejudice.

I think he is trying to do a 'Mad World' with True Faith and it hasn't worked.

0
kb | 10 March 2011 - 1:06pm

my my

Someone's obviously just heard "808s And Heartbreak" then. Unfortunately, when Kanye did it, he made the autotune weep. When George Michael does it, he makes people with ears weep.

As proof:

Say You Will

(Although I think a Mr A Harrison wouldn't be happy about me showing continual love for 808s on here...)

0
badger_king | 10 March 2011 - 6:48pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd