Entertainment For Lively Minds
That George Michael True Faith "reimagining" in part
Posted by Cadabra on 9 March 2011 - 1:32pm.
It's... err... different!
- More from Cadabra.
- Login or register to post comments
Entertainment For Lively Minds
It's... err... different!
If by different
you mean awful I'd agree. I couldn't get past the first 45 seconds
Cobblers
Ghastly
Death by Auto-Tune
Two words
Craig David
can
i get a remand
Y'know what....
I quite like it in a james Blake kind of way
'runs for cover'
It's certainly interesting
I'm not sure about it, but I admire anyone willing to do something so different so far into their career.
What I would say, however, is that this single is for Comic Relief. Surely, the best thing you can do then, is to make a song which is going to appeal to the largest number of people and sell the most amount of records. If George Michael wants to explore this new avenue, then that's fine, but I think he's being a bit selfish here by not giving the people what they want.
Leaves me cold....literally
Autotune....ugh.
Slow,
dull, weird.
It does sound like it is the work
of someone who enjoys a toke or two.
you'd have to smoke a shedload
enough to make you crash your car into your local shops. I dare say at that moment it might sound good
May I be the first to announce....
dear oh dear that's just wrongity wrong. No excuses just plain dull and sad. Shame really because he's done some cracking stuff in the past but most of his output after "Outside" has been plodding and unfun ( don't think this is a word but you get the meaning I hope ).
"I'm iiin the caaar paaaark...."
Well...
Kudos for doing something different with it; there's nothing more pointless than a straight cover of a well known song.
The auto-tune is not only horrible but redundant.
And it makes me think of this:
Autotune isn't always bad
Actually reminds me
mostly of this:
Dreadful, dreadful, dreadful
It actually makes me want to punch my own ears off. I would donate to Comic Relief not to have to ever hear it again.
I'd heard rumours of this tunes grimness
and people weren't wrong. Not only is the voice manipulation annoying the whole things just a bit dull. Also I'm not a big fan but isn't the main part of George's attraction his voice? Shame because a laid back ibza friendly version of the song could be good .
No doubt it will sell by the shed load just to prove us all wrong which seeing as it's for comic relief I wouldn't mind too much.
I actually really quite like it
...once I can actually hear the tune. But then I think the original is one of New Order's most irritating tunes, never liked it all that much, and I'm particularly fond of them.
It could have been saved by not using the effect vocal too much and mixing it with a normally recorded vocal, especially on the choruses.
It reminds me a little of some of the more out there moments by the Super Furries....
Super Furries
I presume you mean something like Juxtaposed With U?
The thing about that is Gruff doesn't use the Vocoder all the way through, he lets his real voice through on the chorus and it resolves itself, plus he did that track ten years ago before Robo-voices were as ubiquitous and cliched as they are now.
I suppose I'll say one thing for the track, it is relentlessly cold and gloomy, far more so than anything New Order ever did...that's an achievement of sorts.
I don't know what they were feeding him...
in the nick, but whatever it was has made his voice go well funny.
I lasted 33 seconds. It is unlistenable bullshit.
Actually not as bad as I was expecting...
I quite like the slow arrangement, and I don't even mind the effect on the voice. All his other records have his normal voice, and there's plenty of those.
What spoilt it for me was his 'soulful' mucking about with the tune. I think if he'd actually sung the real melody, at least most of the time, it would have been more successful.
On first listening, I thought it was a load of old wank.
But, having given it another earing or two, I've changed my mind. I now think it's a load of fucking old wank.
And is that Autotune/Melodyne, a Vocoder or something else entirely?
My version is better.
(And my version is well shit.)
I still like George, though.
i can't stand it...
and it needs more cowbell.
Sparko's Magic Piano...
There might be an interesting cover buried under the ridiculous autotune, I quite like his phrasing for instance and the harmony bit at the start.
But it's obviously an odd production. It sounds like something you might do if you'd found an effect and were testing it out. I've also seen it attributed to late-night-not-entirely-sober mucking about (which wouldn't be unimaginable in his case). These are experiments not things you release to much fanfare as a comeback single.
Also, whether you like his work or not, one thing George Michael is capable of doing is singing. In tune. So why this?
I don't know but it made me think two things.
One is that his well publicised drug hijinks might not be kind to a man's pipes. I sort of doubt he's damaged his voice but it might have become rougher and he may not want to draw attention to this on a comeback single.
The other thought occured while I pondered what a missed opportunity this was - it could have been a very emotional, loaded response to the WMUBYG-GH's recent misfortunes. just look at the first verse:
"I feel so extraordinary
Something's got a hold on me
I get this feeling I'm in motion
A sudden sense of liberty
I don't care 'cause I'm not there
And I don't care if I'm here tomorrow"
(apologies, this is probably going to go very sub-Michael Gray and pretentious, but I'm no writer)
So something's made the singer feel all funny and nice and 'liberated' - so much so that he feels removed from the rest of the world ('I'm not there') and isn't concerned with the future or consequences. Resonance?
I'd never given them much thought before, but hearing them sung by an extremely famous man with an extremely well-publicised drug habit/problem who has done some quite self-destructive (and front-bumper-destructive) things and has recently separated from a long-term partner...gives one pause. There are more interesting and possibly relevent lines later in the song but you get the idea.
In this light the decision to 'hide' the vocal intrigues me more. 'New' or unconfident singers often like to put effects (double-tracking or distortion etc) on recorded vocals, it makes it sound less like 'themselves' (almost everyone hates the way their voice sounds the first time they hear it recorded). Possibly, having chosen a song which is (or could be interpreted as being) so confessional, he's got cold feet and the autotune is way of distancing himself from the sentiments. It's not 'him' singing them. It's Sparky's Magic Piano.
I wouldn't read to much
into Bernard Sumner's lyrics.
This is the man who wrote "Love is the cure for every evil, love is the air that supports the eagle"
and
"...To buy a drink there is so much more reasonable, I think I'll go there when it gets seasonable"
and the none-more Spinal Tap:
"But out there the world is a beautiful place
With mountains, lakes and the human race"
I could go on.
(I am a fan by the way)
Theives Like Us
That song is a brilliant instrumental but Barney poos all over it with a god-awful vocal and terrible lyrics. It sounds like he made up the words as he went along. My favourite bit (if that's the word) is:
"...and it cuts your life
Like a broken knife"
And lest we forget:
Every second counts, when I am with you,
I think you are a pig, you should be in a zoo
Which is such a nuanced disquisition on relationship entropy that it wouldn't look out of place on Blood On The Tacks.
To be fair
he does crack up laughing at the crapness of his own lyric. They didn't bother to re-record another take.
Indeed he's not much of a
Indeed he's not much of a lyricist (although I do think True Faith is quite a decent stab) but again, that's why I think this is a missed opportunity. The K/PWARSH's 'substance abuse turmoil' could have given substance (heh) to the lyric.
It may sound fanciful, but handled the right way it could have been like Johnny Cash's 'Hurt' cover (although I think True Faith's lyric is actually better source material).
You may have a point
about the current vocal ability of the IWYSH. I saw one of his gigs on Sky last year and he was constantly holding the microphone towards the audience to sing-along, most noticeably at the tricky bits.
As with Robbie Williams, I wouldn't be too chuffed if I'd paid through the nose to watch someone perform their hits and they expected me to do half the singing. I think Lee Mack touched on this once:
"Come on Glastonbury, you know the words!"
"You're right, Robbie, we do, and we also paid £130 to see you. Would you mind perhaps singing them for us?"
Oh. Dear
Much as it is to be applauded that someone is trying something new and a bit different for them, it shouldn't blind us to the fact that this is really not very good. A miserable, auto tuned deathly noise made by a man whose mojo is seemingly rapidly vanishing in his rear view mirror (and not because he's reversed over it)
A pity, as I kind of like him, and he's done things of merit in the past. But there you go
Sadly...
...George Michael hasn't done anything decent for years. I adored Listen Without Prejudice.
I think he is trying to do a 'Mad World' with True Faith and it hasn't worked.
my my
Someone's obviously just heard "808s And Heartbreak" then. Unfortunately, when Kanye did it, he made the autotune weep. When George Michael does it, he makes people with ears weep.
As proof:
Say You Will
(Although I think a Mr A Harrison wouldn't be happy about me showing continual love for 808s on here...)