Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Surviving Beatles, head to head in the album charts

Martin Simmonds's picture

Both have albums out within a few days of each other.

Both records loaded with covers and novelties

Why didn’t they get together and save us all some bother?

I suspect a combined Ringo and Paul album would have some mileage in the supermarkets and similar outlets.

0

The Beatles are like the Spice Girls

Great band spawns several irredeamably awful solo careers.

1
Spartacus Mills | 2 February 2012 - 12:02pm

Try these ...

McCartney
Plastic Ono Band
All Things Must Pass
Ram
Imagine
Ringo
Band on the Run
Back to the Egg
George Harrison
Tug of War
Cloud 9
Flaming Pie
Chaos and Creation in the Back Yard

7
dai | 2 February 2012 - 4:08pm

Wot?

No "Electronic Sounds", "Ocean's Kingdom", "Life With The Lions" or "The Wedding Album"?

That's the Best of the Beatles, surely?

0
badger_king | 2 February 2012 - 8:23pm

I'd have Beatles' solo over Stones' solo any day....

....with the honourable exception of Brian's LP, of course.
Oh, and 'Performance'.

0
ranger | 2 February 2012 - 9:02pm

maybe not ...

,... but add Red Rose Speedway, possibly the mosr underrated solo album. Oh, Mind Games too ...

0
dai | 2 February 2012 - 10:12pm

Wrong on two counts

The Spice Girls a great band!? And The Beatles solo careers were not irredemiably awful. BUT good try.

0
wezz | 2 February 2012 - 10:16pm

Eeh

You Beatles devotees are so touchy! I haven't heard a peep out of the Spice Girls fans - they're obviously more broadminded.

0
Spartacus Mills | 2 February 2012 - 11:57pm

Spiceworld

Was a pretty decent film as I recall. Contained a cameo from a certain Mr Costello.
If we were judging Beatles and Spicegirls purely on their cinematic output, it would be a close run thing indeed. (Accepting that a Hard Day's Night is a wonderful film)

0
Martin Simmonds | 3 February 2012 - 10:47am

I know....

i'm probably guilty of heresy but does a Ringo Starr record have any relevance to anyone beyond the Beatles completists.
His output is pretty awful isn't it?

0
Doug B | 2 February 2012 - 1:08pm

I suspect even among Beatles completists...

...there's a 10th Dan hard-core who are the only people to religiously acquire Ringo albums.

I once read a review of a Ringo album in a very earnest Beatles fanzine which said 'This will probably only be of interest to Ringo completists'. That, I thought, is surely a very small percentage of the population indeed....

1
Colin H | 2 February 2012 - 1:14pm

McCartney Solo

Brilliant.

That is all.

4
kidpresentable | 2 February 2012 - 2:44pm

Press to Play

As a teenager, I bought this album.

It is not "brilliant".

2
Sinj | 2 February 2012 - 3:58pm

I'm just so put off

...by the title of Paul's one. It really is witless. Still, i know I'll give it a listen as im interested in anything the man does. Anyone heard it yet?
I won't bother making any snarky remarks about Ringo's but nor do I intend to listen to it.

0
Vorgongod | 2 February 2012 - 4:11pm

It's available to stream online

I flicked through a couple of tracks. It was kind of interesting but not the sort of thing you can imagine playing more than once. Dare say it’s the precursor to various TV appearances. Quite who the target audience is, I really cannot say.

I heard the 1 minute bursts of preview on iTunes of Ringo's thing. Perfectly harmless, bit of a pub band feel to it. Heard all I need to hear.

0
Martin Simmonds | 2 February 2012 - 4:32pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd