Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Speccy four eyes double glazing bin lids

Captain Underpants's picture

Photobucket I've recently acquired my first ever pair of glasses. When I put them on I look elderly and bewildered, but I look like that anyway, so it's okay.

Despite the fact that most friends of my age went quadocular years ago, I still feel like I'm going to get beaten up in the playground for this. It's my close vision that's gone, and if my arms were six inches longer I could have carried on reading without specs for another five years. But it turns out arm extensions are prohibitively expensive, so the bins it is.

With them on, everything within two feet of my face is billion-pixel, Vistavision, angels-on-a-pinhead HUGE, but they turn everything beyond that range to mist, so things tend to lurch towards me out of the clouds at the last minute. I think I prefered it when it was the other way round. My hands freak me out every time I scratch my nose. To see who's talking to you, you either have to look over the top of the frames, which you hope is vaguely professorial but actually makes you look like Scrooge McBloodyDuck, or you can peel them off with a my-god-miss-jones-you're-beautiful flourish which frankly is a bit rich when you're a squinting middle-aged blimp. And whereas you'd expect my fading memory to mean I'd occasionally forget where I'd left the things, in fact most days so far I've forgotten I own them in the first place.

I've noticed there's a certain amount of 'speculation' among the London Massive (although Lenny Law has bizarrely escaped, so that whole thing's just a myth, then) - but tell me, how do you cope with these? Does it get any less weird?

3

Bda news

It will get worse. My first pair were 3 years ago, and I need to upgrade rather urgently. My GLW, who is now officially partially sighted, tells me to stop being a big girl's blouse about it though.

0
paulwright | 21 October 2010 - 8:31pm

It does

I hardly notice I've got them on.
The worst thing is when for instance I've been having a wash, maybe been distracted by a cat, and then I start searching for them. Where the f*** did I put them?
Only to find I'd already put them on.

0
Carl Parker | 21 October 2010 - 8:35pm

Specs

Welcome to the wonderful world of face furniture. The best people wear them. And those that don't, scrabble around on the floor looking for their contacts like Velma out of Scooby Doo. If she wore contacts and not glasses.

1
piglu | 22 October 2010 - 12:22pm

here here

Originally I only needed them for driving and would sink into my seat and slip them on as though committing a criminal act - was painfully self-aware with them on. Then it dawned on me the specs were keepers (and I was never going to go for contacts) and so began buying a really decent pair that suited my big northern head, and now I love them and feel quite odd without them. Hooray.

0
sleepytigercub | 22 October 2010 - 1:44pm

Welcome aboard

I've had them since Primary 5, back when Joe 90 was the role model.

One tip, Captain - if you are someone who takes them off and puts them down, be careful : it can be tense treading softly around a room, patting down surfaces hoping to touch the glasses rather than hear them crunch under your feet. One of my colleagues, a burly civil engineer, looks hilarious with his glasses perched on top of his head, in the same way that Victoria Beckham often wears sunglasses, but he puts them there so he doesn't lose them when he isn't using them.

They are handy, but there are days when seeing things so clearly is not actually a benefit. And the last hilarity from the optician was that now my myopia is wearing off, I should get varifocals. First price quoted around £900. I'm wondering about laser eye surgery as I don't think I can deal with two pairs of glasses.

0
el hombre malo | 21 October 2010 - 8:54pm

A non-expert speaks

If you need varifocals, forget about laser surgery. It may sort out your 'long' vision, but you'll still need readers (on a string around your neck, probably, Norris-stylee) for close up work. (But check with your own optician, YMMV etc)

Been on varifocals for a good few years now, and they're probably my best option, although I do use contacts (daily ones) when I'm going to the footy or driving long distances. With the contacts I need the readers handy for 'close up' stuff.

That said, I went to the opticians yesterday, who have offered me varifocal contact lenses on a trial basis - currently waiting for them to turn up and am stupidly excited about the prospect. Don't know why - I am of an age when I am hardly likely to turn a fair maiden's head by suddenly being back to two eyes rather than four.

Oh, and on the 'four eyes vs two' debate - every so often I confuse my workmates by turning up in lenses rather than giglamps. I would suggest that 90% don't notice the difference at all, 5% might look at me a bit askance as if there is something different they can't quite put their finger on, and 5% will actually realise what I've done. And not give a bugger anyway.

0
Paul Waring | 21 October 2010 - 9:16pm

I'll be interested to hear

how you get on with the varifocal contacts. My experience was like permanent travel sickness so I went back to monovision.

The nice thing about failing eyesight is that there is a brief moment in the morning when I can look in the mirror and not see my mother looking back at me.

1
Helena Handcart | 22 October 2010 - 1:28am

Will report back

...when I've given them a go. Watch this space (no doubt with a slight squint...)

0
Paul Waring | 22 October 2010 - 12:17pm

Worn mine for 30 years..

and still occasionally accidentally wash my face with them on!

0
iggypop | 21 October 2010 - 9:06pm

Worn them since I was 6

Not the same pair, obviously.

Refused at first to wear them in school. My Mum sent a note in and the teacher just stood up and asked me to put them on in the middle of a lesson. My body temperature double in less than a second.

I'm short sighted so I don't suffer from the things coming in from the mist. I just can't see without them. My last eye test bought the remark that I had the near vision of a teenager so I hope to get another 10 years before the bifocals hit.

And if you like nice, cool glasses at reasonable prices, try Iris Optical online (and they have shops in the metropolis & Richmond). Have fun with them and think of picking glasses as just like buying a suit.

0
Leedsboy | 21 October 2010 - 9:12pm

On the basis of that experience at school

Are you Roger Waters and did you write "The Wall" all about it?

I salute your youthful bravery. I just about managed to get through school before I needed glasses - by which I mean I spent the last 2 years copying things off the blackboard from my mate who sat next to me so I didn't have to get specs.

I finally decided it was time to do the deed when I shelled out a year's savings to go and see Genesis in Brussels and decided I was damned if I was going all that way and spending all that money only to see a vague blur in the distance.

Pathetic isn't it?

0
Molesworth | 21 October 2010 - 10:36pm

After the initial horror

I didn't really think about it as harsh. It wasn't until I mentioned it to a colleague (a lawyer as it happens) about 15 years ago, that he commented about how cruel that seems.

And I think The Wall is more torturous than anything that happened to me at school, so no, I am not Roger Waters.

0
Leedsboy | 22 October 2010 - 2:41pm

If you mentioned it to a

lawyer now, he'd probably start talking about getting you some compensation.

0
Molesworth | 22 October 2010 - 3:00pm

The trouble is

I only need them for reading and not always then if the light's bright and the font is a reasonable size. So I quite often forget them when out socially only to find I can't read the menu in dimly-lit restaurants or the Manager's Notes in a football programme (which may be a blessing).

And, being an amateur thesp, when I'm still at the reading from the script or singing from the score stage in rehearsals, it's a question of glasses on to read the words/notes and off again to do the moves.

I guess as I get even older, my eyesight will eventually deteriorate enough to need glasses full time. Then, of course, I'll need my glasses to find my glasses.

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 21 October 2010 - 9:14pm

It's a slippery slope my friend...

Here's a delightful 3 minute film that tells it how it is.

http://johnmedd.blogspot.com/search/label/Danny%20Gregory

0
John Medd | 21 October 2010 - 10:05pm

A specs wearer for 20 years and proud

(...although, thinking about it, I normally wear my contact lenses if I'm going out for the night, meaning that I probably haven't worn them to any of the Word dos.)

Anyway. Being able to see is ace. My glasses don't bother me at all, I never notice I'm wearing them (I have jumped into swimming pools wearing them, having forgotten that I was wearing them).

My husband on the other hand, has been a glasses wearer for 30 years and still can't get used to them...

actually, that reminds me, if we're talking eyes, then permit me to share this with you. It's the story of my eyes and how I see the world (or used to see the world). Click on each picture to see the story.

19
Hannah | 21 October 2010 - 9:21pm

Great story

Have an up!

A song for all the speccies among us, myself include.

1
StuartReeves | 21 October 2010 - 9:41pm

Wow!

You're one BRAVE lady Hannah!

1
Steerpike | 21 October 2010 - 9:44pm

Who was that specs wearing woman?

That was no bespectacled woman, that was Kate Winslet!

Having said I couldn't see the resemblance I opened that link and lo and behold, Ms W looking back at me.

2
Carl Parker | 21 October 2010 - 10:07pm

Crikey!

well done - what a story!

1
el hombre malo | 21 October 2010 - 10:20pm

My mum...

...spent her time on earth with a similar problem - she was operated on (back in the early 50s when she was 7 or 8) for a lazy eye or squint - and despite her protests that it really itched for a couple of months afterward, they eventually acknowledged that yes, they had accidentally left the stitches in. Her eyesight from then onward was double, but one image was at a 30 degree angle on top of the other one. Strangely she was quite happy to drive and said she'd lived with it for so long that it was her "normal" - it's so strange to think that she always saw two of me.

0
nicktf | 22 October 2010 - 6:48am

Splendid

Great stuff, though I wonder how many folk were confused when you said you'd be coming home with an eye-pad and then turned up looking like a very hygenic pirate rather than clutching the latest gizmo.

3
Con Coleman | 22 October 2010 - 8:20am

Dammit, Con!

You beat me to it. I was going to make a hilarious joke about how Hannah had said she didn't have iPad envy on the Kindle thread...

Although, now I think about it, it's lucky you did beat me to it.

Hannah, that's a great little photo story. I don't know if I'd have had the guts to let them take a knife and fork to my peepers, so congratulations for officially being My Bravest Friend™. And I'm very glad you're not seeing double, especially on Word nights out. One of me is quite enough, I'd imagine. And as for that Underpants character...

2
Bob | 22 October 2010 - 9:10am

Apologies, my ursine friend...

It's not often that I'm in the right place at the right time on this here blog but I saw an open goal and clumsily booted one in.

1
Con Coleman | 22 October 2010 - 9:37am

Any op is stressful

But one on your eyes doubly so, Hannah (no pun intended). Glad it went well and life has balanced out for you now.
Two questions pertaining to your days of multiple vision:
1) Were you convinced that you held the record for the most double posts on this blog?
2) Every time you baked one of your scrumptious cakes, who exactly did you think had scoffed its twin?

1
drakeygirl | 22 October 2010 - 8:26am

Growing up with glasses

I was a speccy twat from the age of 4 to 15 which is how long my lazy eye took to cure. The only thing that annoyed me was as a cub scout footballer I was banging them in every Saturday whilst the sport teacher at school wouldn't pick me because I wore bins. Even though his team couldn't score and half of them played with me in the cubs and told him. Needless to say I didn't have to wear them on the pitch.
Of course, nowadays, most parents would take the school to court for this kind of discrimination ;-).
And yes, I was the boy wearing the NHS specs with the eyepatch. A glamorous look which combined with the day-to-day fashion "style" of 1975 gave me the air of a miniature escaped lunatic.
I played cricket against a bloke who had the laser surgery this season. He considered it an absolute success.

2
Richie B | 22 October 2010 - 9:59am

Crikey, what a lovely response!

Thank you, splendid Word chums for all the ups and comments. You're all very lovely.

You might be interested in knowing something about the somewhat unusual operation benefits (aside from the obvious niceties of having single vision and being able to enjoy a 3D film for the first time (AMAZING!))

1) no more neck or shoulder pain, after years of costly physio and osteo treatments. now I've fixed my eyes, my head is naturally straighter.

2) as my head and neck are much straighter, my singing voice has much improved.

3) my driving's much better, apparently I overtake people at a decent distance now, rather than being right up their bum (had no concept of how close I was to the other car before).

and some replies to your qs and comments:

Carl: these days, I'm definitely a fat Kate Winslet look-a-like. I shall dig out some photos from the early 90s when I was somewhat skinnier and definitely more Kate-esque...

Nicktf: Yes, that's absolutely it, my "normal" for 30 years would do anyone else's head in. I had to have two operations - one to partially correct, the other to finish the job, and it was an absolute nightmare after the first op. My double vision was "better" than it was before, but because it was different double vision, my brain couldn't cope with it. I had trouble walking around my own house even, I'd have to pat my way along the walls because I couldn't be sure where the doors or even the floor was!

Con: "a very hygienic pirate". love it.

Idiotbear: get out your glitter glue and scissors, I want an "I'm Idiotbear's Bravest Friend" certificate

Drakeygirl: cake scoffing can always be blamed on my husband.

and that's it for now. thanks again. xxx

1
Hannah | 22 October 2010 - 6:03pm

I'm with you Captain

I'm 49, pushing 50 and find that small print, low light, cooking instructions on tins - all have me reaching for my new Tesco readers (£6 including protective 'cigar' case). Actually, these are my 4th pair in as many months - I have trodden on or lost the others.

After all these years of 20/20 vision I really can't get the hang of them, but BOY! with them on I can read the date on my watch in forensic detail.

Serious question though - Should I get proper prescription lenses ?? Or am I just paying for the teeny tiny logo on the frame??

0
Steerpike | 21 October 2010 - 9:25pm

a proper prescription

has nothing to designer bins. Get a proper eye test and you can get cheap frames. I'd avoid all the lenses coatings etc and just get decent pair to fit your face. Your work may pay for eye test if you work at pc all day.

0
Chris G | 21 October 2010 - 10:10pm

Thank you

I have quite a long face

Photobucket

What style best suits?

0
Steerpike | 21 October 2010 - 10:34pm

So Steerpike walks into a bar

and the barman goes "Why the long face?"

Before I fetch my coat, have a serious answer.

Stay away from the short, narrow style frames, they'll make your face look even longer. Go for a wider (taller), squarer style frame to balance things out.

1
Hannah | 22 October 2010 - 4:18pm

Thanks Hannah

Are we talking Michael Caine/Jarvis Cocker stylee?

0
Steerpike | 22 October 2010 - 4:42pm

Yes, we are.

oh, Jarvis Cocker! *swoons*

I looooooooooove Jarvis

*swoons again for good measure*

0
Hannah | 22 October 2010 - 6:17pm

Spectacularly short sighted

since the age of 6 or so. Wore glasses from that age until my late 20's when I switched to contacts.

Without any visual aid my world is an entirely fuzzy mass of colour. Nothing becomes pin sharp until its about 15cm from my face.

My prescription for each eye is ~8. Not the worst there is. Its been constant now for about 10 years. My optician seems convinced that as I get older long sight will manifest. I've taken this to mean I'll become less and less short sighted over time and am looking forward to about 10 days worth of pure unaided 20-20 vision at the age of 86 before I have to wear glasses for long sight.

I wear my glasses at night at home. When a single man and sharing a house with like-minded bell ends some time ago, a good game for them was to try my admittedly jam jar bottomed lensed glasses on whilst drunk. I think the record was 40 seconds before they were flung off - their wussily perfect retinas seared by the magnification.

Edit: Inspired by Hannah - here's me in spectacle wearing action

4
Beezer | 21 October 2010 - 9:46pm

Sorry to break this to you...

While you will get long-sighted as you get older, that won't mean your short-sight will get better. The former is caused by the muscles in your eyes working less well, the latter by defects in the lenses.
You'll just be long-sighted AND short-sighted. Or so my optician says with a grin.

0
David Cooper | 22 October 2010 - 12:55am

HOORAY!

Great pic.

0
Hannah | 22 October 2010 - 6:55pm

He hasn't changed

a bit...!

0
Retro Man | 22 October 2010 - 9:34pm

errr...

forgot to add one of these ;-)

0
Retro Man | 22 October 2010 - 9:36pm

Yowsah

Mrs Pants must have been mad to miss out on you all those years ago, Andy. Your loss my gain, though, I guess.

2
Captain Underpants | 22 October 2010 - 10:54pm

Fighting them off with a shitty stick

That photo was taken before the move up the High School. Can you believe I became even more handsome than that?

Frankly I've never understood why I remained a virgin till I was 29.

I've said too much...

2
Beezer | 22 October 2010 - 11:28pm

Worn mine for about 40 years

Went in for an exam today... eyesight improving over the last exam! Apparently this is quite normal.

You may still get beaten up on the playground, but not for wearing glasses... ;)

0
MyAmericanMate | 21 October 2010 - 9:48pm

Yep bins wearer and proud

they're great. Most people who say they have good eye sight don't they just don't know how bad it's got.

0
Chris G | 21 October 2010 - 10:14pm

Speccy four eyes

and always have been. I've worn glasses since the age of 5 or 6, but I've always been very short-sighted, it just took my parents a few years to notice.

It's a pain, I wish I wasn't, but 95% of the time, I don't notice. To be honest, the expense of buying glasses is more irritating than wearing them. I've bought new ones fairly recently, and quite worryingly, I've learnt from Word meet-ups that they're very similar to idiotbear's, I look a bit like I'm a fanboy of his.

If it bothers you, though, I'd recommend contacts. I've been wearing them now and then since I was 15 and they're fine. You also somehow gain the ability to take them out whilst completely inebriated, which is always a good thing.

0
Joe R | 21 October 2010 - 10:29pm

but gebs win hands down

on the "3 sheets wind test" you just take them off no potions or poltices or spare sets of lens etc and no poking yourself in the eye (well not deliberately anyway)

0
Chris G | 21 October 2010 - 11:08pm

worn them for 10 years now

Boy has time flown...

Apparently I now look weird without them. It takes all sorts I suppose.

All the best to you, Captain, no doubt you will get used to them, but it will take time. :)

0
badger_king | 21 October 2010 - 10:41pm

A couple of thoughts..

Much as I hate to upset the Good Captain, I do wear glasses, but normally only when my eyes are tired, generally after a day at work.

My time at work is spent with a pair of these beauties straped to my face. You want glasses? THESE are glasses.

And, on a serious note..

My mate Sat is shockingly short-sighted. The degree of distortion of his eyeball which causes such extreme myopia triggers spontaneous retinal detachment which can be repaired initially but, thereafter, can't. He has lost the sight in one eye already and the other is heading the same way. He will, one day soon, become suddenly blind. Every time he looks at his wife and kids, he knows that it might be the last time he sees them.

0
Lenny Law | 21 October 2010 - 11:00pm

You Bugger

So few words. Such a large impact. I cannot imagine. I don't want to. But I can. And do.

0
bamthwok | 21 October 2010 - 11:13pm

I need glasses for distance vision.

It started off as just for driving, about 12 years at ago at age 40. No big deal. I kept them in the car and as soon as the weather turned hot, I found out that this is an extremely dumb thing to do. The optician was very nice and put the lenses back in for me, though. A few years later, either cars were being made with a focus distortion field or my eyes had deteriorated so a new pair were purchased. Then I noticed that I needed them to watch the TV, to watch a film. Hmmm... I'm on my third prescription now.

I used to think that wearing them would make my eyes lazy so I should make an effort NOT to wear them and "exercise" my eyes. Doesn't work. I find the world is getting more blurred without my specs and snaps back into focus when I put them on. And when I take them off after a 2 hour drive, everything looks a bit blurred until my eyes get used to working solo.

C'est la vie.

0
Mark JF | 21 October 2010 - 11:14pm

They sit in a case

next to me, purchased from Boots just a couple of weeks ago. I can see the lap top and my work PC but reading books, newspapers, or mobile phones is impossible without them. My wife who is always a great support can't look at me while I have them on as apparently I turn into my sister. I have to wear them, I know I do because pulling THAT face while holding things at arms length just doesn't work any more. I will take them to work tomorrow as a sign of solidarity to The Captain and all other spectacle wearers.

1
Dave Amitri | 21 October 2010 - 11:59pm

People thought I was rude and arrogant

for years, when in reality I couldn't see them properly and would easily pass them in the street without knowing it.
I don't know why I waited so long to get my eyes checked out. Part of it perhaps was due to being shy. It always felt as if I was invisible ( "if I can't see them, they can't see me" ) and that I was inside my own cosy bubble where noone could bother me.
Now I can't understand how I could survive for that many years walking around half blind!
I use lenses ( daily ) when I leave my home, and change into glasses when I come back. But I have to wear these ultra-light glasses that a mild gust of wind would send sailing two blocks in half a second ( and I would never ever find them again ). "Have to" as in anything more substantial sends me into a fit of rage ( "my ears hurt! both sides of my nose hurts! everything I look at has a bloody frame around it! get me out of this torture device - aaaargh!" )
Also you never realise that one of your ears is placed much lower than the other until you get your first pair of glasses.

0
Locust | 22 October 2010 - 2:30am

My Handle

Has everything to do with wearing specs (and a bit to do with having fair hair).

I've worn them since I was 10 - if you start as a kid they become part of you really, and I often feel like something's missing when I don't have them on. Contacts are great, but it's amazing how much more comfortable it is having the lenses floating round on the outside of your face rather than sticking to your eyes. At least you know they're still there, and they don't roll up to to the top of your eyeballs.

0
milkybarnick | 22 October 2010 - 8:30am

The long and the short of it

Apparently I'm long-sighted in one eye and short-sighted in the other.

For years, they worked shifts - my optician said when I was reading or sewing, the long-sighted eye just downed tools and said "Yeah, whateva..." and let the short-sighted one get on with it, and vice versa.

As I've got older though, the brain and eye muscles now struggle to compensate, so I opted for varifocals last year (v. lightweight, no frames). Had the usual "they've got the prescription wrong, I'm taking them back" reaction at first, but got used to them and they're fine.

I put them on when I leave the house, and take them off as soon as I get home (until I need to read or sew...) - going sans-specs is now a treat, like relaxing into a comfy fuzzy pair of slippers.

0
millymollymandy | 22 October 2010 - 8:34am

It started out as whimsical dabbling

a curious flirtation with a pair of Ready-Spex now ten years on from that fateful day I'm hooked on the hard stuff,Varifocals.I like wearing glasses which may seem odd but I've never been a vain person about my looks,in fact anything which helps too conceal my utter blandness is more than welcome.

1
Pencilsqueezer | 22 October 2010 - 8:44am

I've wanted glasses all my life....

...so the episode of Peppa Pig when Pedro tells Peppa she needs glasses, but the optician says she doesn't, is particularly moving for me.

Fortunately, last year I started suffering with crippling headaches (yay!) and went to the optician for the first time since the heartbreaking glasses rejection episode of 1992. When it became apparent that the combination of short sight in my right eye and astigmatism in the left was causing me to strain my eyes when reading and using the computer - thus causing the headaches - I thought to myself, "What glasses might Joe R, who I've not met yet, be buying in the not too distant future?" It seemed obvious: slightly nerdy black-rimmed ones, of course!

Sadly, I came up short and bought the "cool" nerd kind, the ones affected by twats who have pined to be glasses-wearers their whole lives and are trying just a bit too hard.

However, I am now happy and fulfilled. I knew I was a glasses-wearer, deep down, and now my dream is realised.

3
Bob | 22 October 2010 - 9:18am
Chris G | 22 October 2010 - 9:17am

Takes a lot of getting used to

When I got my varifocals, if I lay down on the sofa to watch the telly I couldn't see anything. And I could only read if I sat bolt upright.

So I went back and told them I couldn't get on with these varifocals as they didn't suit my lifestyle. When they asked me what my lifestyle was I began with the lying on the sofa bit and they looked at me like I was Jim Royle.

Still can't do varifocals though, and have two different pairs. One makes me look like Michael Douglas in Wonder Boys, the other a Nazi guard at Belsen.

1
Five-Centres | 22 October 2010 - 10:14am

Specs for 30+ years

and varifocals for the past 5. I found glasses gave me a confidence I never had without them - crazy, I know - a bit like a defence mechanism, I guess. I can't imagine not wearing them and the thought of an op scares the beejeebers out of me. The varifocals took a lot of getting used to but, again, I don't notice that I'm adjusting my vision to find the 'sweet spot'. Stick with it, Captain.

0
niallb | 22 October 2010 - 12:47pm

"Who scored?"

"I don't bloody know, I can't see a bloody thing"

Me to my dad about half way through an evening kick-off match at Reading FC about 10 years ago, that was the exact time we both realised we had to go and get our eyes checked.

Just need them for driving, watching the footie and TV, luckily don't need them for reading or writing on the Blog.

Have recently been told off by the FPO for developing a habit of moving glasses onto my forehead as if they are sunglasses if changing from watching TV to read something or talk to someone. Apparently this does not look cool.

0
Retro Man | 22 October 2010 - 3:01pm

"Who scored?"

If you were watching Reading, the correct answer was, of course, "the opposition" :)

2
Joe R | 22 October 2010 - 3:46pm

I set you up nicely for that punch-line...

I'm just your very own Syd Little...

0
Retro Man | 22 October 2010 - 4:02pm

Bugger

I got my eyes tested yesterday and decided to stick with the old specs as my prescription was much the same and they're only a year old and were expesnive varifocals. I spent lunchtime today reading this thread and marvelling at so many speccy Word readers like myself. Just settling down to watch the telly now, I took them off to give them a polish and snapped the buggers in half. So now I can't see the tv, have to squint at the computer screen and will only be able to read if I hold a book within 10cm of my nose. Forget about driving or cycling anywhere too. I'm off to Brum for work on Monday by train and in importnat meetings on Tue and Wed and I'm going to be squinting, bewildered, clueless and permanently startled looking. Does any optician still do those lenses in an hour offers...??

Oh well, mddle age...

1
toiras34 | 22 October 2010 - 9:24pm

My typos are testament to my

My typos are testament to my suffering!

0
toiras34 | 22 October 2010 - 9:28pm

I love my glasses...

and take great enjoyment from their tendency to steam up when I'm drinking an espresso.

0
Patrick Crowther | 22 October 2010 - 10:15pm

Postscript

I got the 5:15 train back from Manchester to Euston today. "Hey, it's the 5:15, let's get out of our brains!" I said to my colleagues, who, from the looks they gave me, clearly aren't fans of Quadrophenia. So instead I decided to check on the progess of this thread on my fruit-based handheld irritant, and guess what? I couldn't read a bloody word of it.

There's probably a lesson in this somewhere, but I've no idea what it is.

0
Captain Underpants | 22 October 2010 - 10:44pm

Get an iPad?

Bigger fonts all round.

0
Leedsboy | 23 October 2010 - 5:18pm

I've gone from zero to three pairs

in virtually no time at all. Need them for staring at a computer, which is my job, and my hobby, apparently. Sadly, a combination of kids and terminal forgetfulness necessitated a work pair and a home pair. One of these, mysteriously, is varifocals, despite my only wearing them for the aforementioned pc staring. The third pair arrived after a work-sponsored eye test this year. Effectively free, and handy to know I have backup. Ugly backup, like an extra in Taggart, but backup nonetheless.

0
Big Pants | 22 October 2010 - 10:58pm

I do / don't need glasses normally.

Depends on what I'm watching or doing. I have very, very pale blue eyes so I need to wear sunglasses pretty much all the time when I'm outside. It seems bright to me even when it's overcast. If the sun's out, I have to have a brimmed hat on as well.

My relationship with glasses keeps me fit. My specs will either be on my face, my forehead, the chest of drawers by the front door or the bedside cabinet. I live in a three-storey house. Bedroom on th top floor. The chasing up and down stairs in search of glasses is a constant travail.

1
Lenny Law | 22 October 2010 - 11:56pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd