Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Songs of faint praise

David Hepworth's picture

I am indebted to Five Centres (or "Five" as he is known to his friends) for his observation on the Wiki Prog thread that Farshad Bahadoran were "very much of their time".
This is the kind of damnation via faint praise with which we refer to music that is or has been critically lauded but is clinically unlistenable.
In the same bracket we can also place the adjective "challenging", the compound "brave stab" and the clearest instruction to keep well clear, "intriguing."
There must be a list in this.

0

rubbish bands are often

"brave" because, as far as pop music's concerned, "brave" means "unlistenable"

0
Rob Fitzpatrick | 14 December 2007 - 4:23pm

"One for the completist"

A "cult" act can sometimes mean one that's only caught the attention of an enlightened and lucky few. But more often than not it's a synonym for useless.
And, it goes without saying, it is imperative that you don protective clothing, swiftly remove from the premises and thoroughly dispose of any track or album that is "one for the completist"

0
Richard Lowe | 14 December 2007 - 4:34pm

Uncommercial.......

I'm always wary of a track that someone tells me is uncommercial. It can mean two things either a possible grower or more usually utter tuneless garbage.

0
Steve Hill | 14 December 2007 - 4:49pm

faint praise

Can we add "quirky" to the list especially when associated with "humour". It's code for not funny (unless you're a pissed student)
"on a jazz tip" usually sends a chill down my spine.
"Popular live attraction" ie rubbish on record.

Also being contary I usually take against a band if I hear a hollywood star is "big Fan" or the words "Geldof" and "Peaches" are mentioned in the article.

0
Chris G | 14 December 2007 - 5:03pm

A classic....

"Going in a new direction"...abandoning what made them so successful in the first place, ie. commercial suicide

0
David Sutherland | 14 December 2007 - 5:18pm

'Seminal'

...in the real world means 'it sounds a bit rubbish these days'.

0
eddie g | 14 December 2007 - 8:32pm

"Visceral"

Either 'out of tune' or 'first take, couldn't be arsed to either rehearse or do it again properly'

0
skirky | 14 December 2007 - 8:39pm

Nice!

In a jazz context:

free = tuneless

harmolodic = tuneless

explorations = tuneless

avant-garde = tuneless

0
Johan | 14 December 2007 - 9:31pm

it's a bit esque

I believe this to be on the Word reviewers banned list [ from a dim & distant shed cast ] its never a good synomym for "sounds like" cos more often than not, they wont...oh and the suffix "ish"

0
yankeeragu | 14 December 2007 - 9:52pm

Antibiosis

Can there be a more career damaging tool in the reviewer's lexicon than the phrase: ‘Championed by Noel Gallagher.' Applied to illegal firearms, this tagline would ensure overnight that handguns lost their outlawish cool forever. If only DEMOS, or any of the other government think tanks, would reply to my many emails on this subject.

It doesn't have to be Noel Gallagher. It can be anyone who, upon reaching elder statesman of rock status, finds their drive and creativity sinking into a terminal rut, as their wealth and self-importance increases. What better way to recapture their lost youth than by offering a leg-up to some dreadful indy no-marks, who in a true meritocracy would play the biggest gig of their career in the back room of a pub in Salford.

0
backwards7 | 15 December 2007 - 12:26pm

Can there ever be...

Yes.

'Championed by Liam Gallagher.

You always hope the elder statesmonkey had drive and creativity to start with.

0
Oeufman | 15 December 2007 - 1:32pm

Faint praise indeed

Under-rated - means no-one likes them!!

Acquired taste - means you are not likely to enjoy them

Overblown - lengthy, tuneless solos

One for the diehards - Means you will only like it if you are the mother of the lead singer.

0
Steve Turner | 15 December 2007 - 3:36pm

Gig reviews: a translator's guide

a new/interesting/fascinating take on - they forgot the chords of
audacious - laughably misguided
awash in - ruined by
blues-tinged - everything was in E
bold - see audacious
call and response - the keyboard player kept showing the guitarist what to play
committed to their craft (esp. "admirably") - huddled around the drum riser with their backs to the audience
coruscating - anything the writer wants it to mean, except what it really means: bright and glittering (Michael Stipe could equally have sung about "coruscating happy people"; in fact, it might have been a slightly better song if he had)
crystalline - "Weren't loud enough!"
dark and edgy - surly and miserable
defiant - trudged on regardless as the Stella cans rained down
eclectic - a covers band
established empathy with the audience immediately - ran on and said "Hello, Lee-sester!", to which the audience responded in unison: "Wanker!"
flowing - interminable
full-bodied - too bassy
funky - a bunch of white blokes with sequencers
fusion - neither one thing nor the other
immediate - under-rehearsed
inchoate - messy
influential (esp. "hugely") - dropped by their record label after two albums
intense - humourless
intimate - the bar staff outnumbered the audience 3-to-1
intricate - the band thought they were playing one song, the drummer another
loose (esp. "refreshingly") - out of tune and out of time
primal - crass
pulsating - chest-heavingly, lunch-losingly loud
raw - inept
redolent of (esp. "somehow") - shamelessly ripped off from
soulful - tuneless
soundscape (esp. "vibrant") - Goddod-awfulful acousticsics
sparkling - too trebly
tight (esp. "impressively") - ooh, look who got a drum machine for Christmas
uncompromising - unsignable
unhurriedly paced - inter-song tune-ups lasted twice as long as the songs themselves
warm and rich - muddy
wired - they hate each other

0
Archie Valparaiso | 15 December 2007 - 4:13pm

Step forward, John Duncan...

"naked and apologetic"
"grimacing passion"
"mix and match version of his old bandmates"
"jaw dropping concert"
"strange, typically enigmatic set"
"a few truly rare gems"

Can you tell who it is yet?

0
skirky | 16 December 2007 - 1:56pm

It's a review of ...

Neil Young! From today's Observer.

0
Johan | 16 December 2007 - 9:14pm

Post Punk

clever: sounds like XTC
jangly: they've heard the Byrds
post punk: can mean virtually anything
post/sub-rock: guitar based and sounds like a 45 playing at 16rpm
proto punk: short, fast, shoutey
techno flash: although I haven't seen this one since the 70s, it was usually included in a review of anything by the Mahavishnu Orchestra

0
James Blast | 18 December 2007 - 4:04pm

Post punk

Surely Post Punk means "far more interested in posing around than making the effort to learn to play, leeching off off other more worthy forms which required little more that a decent hired engineer - c/f dub (originally a clever remix of a reggae song for the DJ to toast over), Krautrock (originally an interesting take on euro disco - post puknk version lets the synthesier and sequencer take the strain). Silly haircut necessary, ideally with Jesus sandles, ankle socks and stupid khaki shorts.

0
Twangothan | 20 December 2007 - 6:52pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd