Entertainment For Lively Minds
Sometimes Pitchfork is beyond satire.
If Maggoty Lamb went down with a really bad fever while watching Nathan Barley, and grew delirious, he might write something like this little gem which my friend Ted just unearthed from Pitchfork.
The classics kid in me craves noble grandeur-- craft-happy shit with more than meets the rods and cones, less is always more (except with clothes), suggestive-seductive vs. the once-off gunfuck. Full-on body music's great, sure, but so is porno, and with that shit I'd much rather wax new flesh than drag my stylus off the same old 10-second loop. Same time, Intelligent Body Music's as much a nightmare as Intelligent Anal, both a prefab excuse for pleasure-lack. So we're stuck in this immediacy=better rut, when really the best stuff cross-genre-- cross-platform, cross-media-- has instant funk, but with enough tricks for prolonged appeal.
Liking We Are Monster is easy. Isolée aren't bangers but they groove hard enough; melodies are pretty but most times we have to look for them (no lead vox or riff jihad per se). Tracks aren't afraid to be songs ("Face B"), and songs aren't afraid to be tracks ("Jelly Baby / Fish"). Everything's pleasant in other words, non-threatening like the cutesy-est Morr Music lullaby, but physical enough that you could get away with some great normal-person dancing. There are guitar sounds on a few tracks too, if that's important ("Today" sounds like "Do You Realize?"), and traceable horizontal A-->B trajectory in songs with actual movements and quantifiable progress. No need for all the "it's about size! it's about expansion!" apologies people make for their favorite loops.
As for loving this record-- letting it problematize itself with spins and learning to let it offend-- well, We Are Monster has the depth if you have the time. Yep, here's a fun record that's a work-for-it, in-the-details record, too. Behind the choked-vocals groove of, say, "Enrico" are countless micro-surprises (check how the kicks break down differently each turnaround, or how the downbeat finally drops deceptively mid-bar instead of on the loop's head), structured flips with chess-like anticipation (the guitar-like scratches function percussively at first, their color stuck in overtones until the song needs them in full), and avalanching momentum not from Isolée stuffing ideas half-baked, but from letting the seeds of lines grow, branch out, and tangle. Not sure we can talk of "Golden Age IDM" or even "Golden Age Techno" yet, but something like the Copeland-does-Glam gem "Schrapnell" seems so effortless, breathes so carefree, years from now crits might accuse it of sounding timeless-- maybe even of being so.
The rest of the tracks have their own self-revealing logic, obeying the beat but never in dependency to it. Honestly, you could drop the drum sounds off "Madchen mit Hase" and the song would still kill a floor, the rhythms of its composite parts boasting good spine, serving the melody before decorating the dancefloor. No gesture's incidental; the simplest blip plays for both a greater purpose and its own passing punchline. Even the second-trackiest number, "Do Re Mi", fronts a perplexing guitar jingle so it can alley-oop with drones of the same progression and a goofy italo-disco melody of 180-degree mood change, then the polar-opposite timbre. These songs are well-poised and well-developed and terrifyingly autonomous-- so much so I'm afraid they're no longer Isolée's anymore. On that note: Yeah, while I wish We Are Monster was an Album w/Overarching Concerns and Worldview, not just a Bunch Of Sweet Similar-Sounding Stand-Alone Tracks, I'm also convinced that in fact, a worldview is there, and probably an exciting one at that. I just haven't cracked one yet-- or just won't be able to.
Does anyone have the slightest fucking idea what this chap's on about? Is it a joke?
Either way, it's well Jackson. Keep it dusty.
- More from Bob.
- Login or register to post comments










I'm sure all the right words are in there
Possibly just not in the right order.
At least with Lester Bangs...
one always basically knew what the hell he was banging on about, even at his most "out there".
I read one sentence of the above, felt the life draining out of me and decided that was quite enough.
Methinks that I am perhaps not part of Pitchfork's target demographic.
Always go back to Bangs
for (often) well written and forthright reviewing and commentry.
Nick Sylvester
is the guy who wrote that. A quick Google also reveals that 5 years ago he was asked to leave Village Voice and Pitchfork for fabricating an article.
Honestly, you couldn't make it up.
Er...
Isn't this
just one of those Fry & Laurie sketches where Fry was wanking on about language and Laurie was utterly perplexed?
I do like
a micro-suprise
Tracks aren't afraid to be songs.
and songs aren't afraid to be tracks either!
Well, I'm sold.
Pitchfork...
... is the most "up itself" music website I've seen, and I've seen a few.
Awesome fucking Wells!
Keep it dense yeah?
To be fair that article was written 6 years ago so hardly the voice of today's yoof.
And, I do own that record! It's well weapon!
Call me naive, but I rather thought
that the point of writing was to communicate something. This piece really doesn't. It's self-indulgent poppycock. The Emperor, ladies and gentlemen, is bereft of clothing.
Another poor bugger who can't
stop himself dancing to architecture.
I heard about this guy getting kicked off
I think he's pretty much persona non grata in that uber-cool, Pavement-worshipping, hipster clique now.
Anyway, I think that article's totally Mexico.
This does give me an excuse to link to my favourite ever Onion article though: Pitchfork Gives Music 6.8
Hahahahahahahahaha *lolz forever*
That article's amazing. "In the end, though music can be brilliant at times, the whole medium comes off as derivative of Pavement."
Bob asks the important question. "Is it a joke?"
Please, in the name of all we hold sacred, let the answer be "YES!!"
you can take the boy out of editorial ...
The classicist in me craves grandeur - well crafted work with more to it than meets the eye. Put another way: less is more rather than instant gratification (the fashion business notwithstanding). Dance music is great but so is pornography (where I would rather be pressing new flesh than 'dragging my stylus off the same old 10-second loop', if you see what I mean). All the same, Intelligent Body Music is as much of a nightmare as Intelligent Anal and both are very dull. That means we are stuck in a rut where the immediate is supposed to be better, whereas the very best cross-genre material actually has instant funkiness with enough trickery for prolonged appeal.
It still doesn't make sense because I'm clueless about the context.
Um...
I am almost afraid to admit that I like it. Makes perfect sense to me.
Melody Maker
Reminds me of MM, circa 1985-1993. Could almost be Chris Roberts at his finest.
Keep feelin' fascination:
lookin', learnin', movin' on.
I found it impossible to read without Nathan Barley's voice in my head.
I loved reading it, no matter if it's sincere or a piss-take.
Surely he/she intended it to be funny?
Surely?!
Opining string braids and hushed sepia trimmings
This is from my favourite press release ever - please note this is just one sentence.
"fahks sakes...
I try a new sound, and a new PR person and you fahckers just laugh at me..."
RIFF JIHAD
I want that on a T Shirt.
Whassup, my nigga?
Writing
In my experience, the best writing is also very easy to read. I find styles such as this give me the same sort of swooning nausea you get from reading in a car.
I like Isolee
but this review does them no favours even if was meaning to. I started skimming by the thrid sentence and glazed over totally by the third paragraph.
So, was it any good according to him?
No idea.