Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Sometimes Pitchfork is beyond satire.

Bob's picture

If Maggoty Lamb went down with a really bad fever while watching Nathan Barley, and grew delirious, he might write something like this little gem which my friend Ted just unearthed from Pitchfork.

The classics kid in me craves noble grandeur-- craft-happy shit with more than meets the rods and cones, less is always more (except with clothes), suggestive-seductive vs. the once-off gunfuck. Full-on body music's great, sure, but so is porno, and with that shit I'd much rather wax new flesh than drag my stylus off the same old 10-second loop. Same time, Intelligent Body Music's as much a nightmare as Intelligent Anal, both a prefab excuse for pleasure-lack. So we're stuck in this immediacy=better rut, when really the best stuff cross-genre-- cross-platform, cross-media-- has instant funk, but with enough tricks for prolonged appeal.

Liking We Are Monster is easy. Isolée aren't bangers but they groove hard enough; melodies are pretty but most times we have to look for them (no lead vox or riff jihad per se). Tracks aren't afraid to be songs ("Face B"), and songs aren't afraid to be tracks ("Jelly Baby / Fish"). Everything's pleasant in other words, non-threatening like the cutesy-est Morr Music lullaby, but physical enough that you could get away with some great normal-person dancing. There are guitar sounds on a few tracks too, if that's important ("Today" sounds like "Do You Realize?"), and traceable horizontal A-->B trajectory in songs with actual movements and quantifiable progress. No need for all the "it's about size! it's about expansion!" apologies people make for their favorite loops.

As for loving this record-- letting it problematize itself with spins and learning to let it offend-- well, We Are Monster has the depth if you have the time. Yep, here's a fun record that's a work-for-it, in-the-details record, too. Behind the choked-vocals groove of, say, "Enrico" are countless micro-surprises (check how the kicks break down differently each turnaround, or how the downbeat finally drops deceptively mid-bar instead of on the loop's head), structured flips with chess-like anticipation (the guitar-like scratches function percussively at first, their color stuck in overtones until the song needs them in full), and avalanching momentum not from Isolée stuffing ideas half-baked, but from letting the seeds of lines grow, branch out, and tangle. Not sure we can talk of "Golden Age IDM" or even "Golden Age Techno" yet, but something like the Copeland-does-Glam gem "Schrapnell" seems so effortless, breathes so carefree, years from now crits might accuse it of sounding timeless-- maybe even of being so.

The rest of the tracks have their own self-revealing logic, obeying the beat but never in dependency to it. Honestly, you could drop the drum sounds off "Madchen mit Hase" and the song would still kill a floor, the rhythms of its composite parts boasting good spine, serving the melody before decorating the dancefloor. No gesture's incidental; the simplest blip plays for both a greater purpose and its own passing punchline. Even the second-trackiest number, "Do Re Mi", fronts a perplexing guitar jingle so it can alley-oop with drones of the same progression and a goofy italo-disco melody of 180-degree mood change, then the polar-opposite timbre. These songs are well-poised and well-developed and terrifyingly autonomous-- so much so I'm afraid they're no longer Isolée's anymore. On that note: Yeah, while I wish We Are Monster was an Album w/Overarching Concerns and Worldview, not just a Bunch Of Sweet Similar-Sounding Stand-Alone Tracks, I'm also convinced that in fact, a worldview is there, and probably an exciting one at that. I just haven't cracked one yet-- or just won't be able to.

Does anyone have the slightest fucking idea what this chap's on about? Is it a joke?

Either way, it's well Jackson. Keep it dusty.

11

I'm sure all the right words are in there

Possibly just not in the right order.

6
Resting Place | 23 November 2011 - 9:07pm

At least with Lester Bangs...

one always basically knew what the hell he was banging on about, even at his most "out there".

I read one sentence of the above, felt the life draining out of me and decided that was quite enough.

Methinks that I am perhaps not part of Pitchfork's target demographic.

1
Patrick Crowther | 23 November 2011 - 9:10pm

Always go back to Bangs

for (often) well written and forthright reviewing and commentry.

0
Slick | 24 November 2011 - 1:39pm

Nick Sylvester

is the guy who wrote that. A quick Google also reveals that 5 years ago he was asked to leave Village Voice and Pitchfork for fabricating an article.

Honestly, you couldn't make it up.

Er...

0
Ahh_Bisto | 23 November 2011 - 9:40pm

Isn't this

just one of those Fry & Laurie sketches where Fry was wanking on about language and Laurie was utterly perplexed?

0
Molesworth | 23 November 2011 - 9:49pm

I do like

a micro-suprise

0
James EB | 23 November 2011 - 10:07pm

Tracks aren't afraid to be songs.

and songs aren't afraid to be tracks either!

Well, I'm sold.

0
sam and janet e... | 23 November 2011 - 10:21pm

Pitchfork...

... is the most "up itself" music website I've seen, and I've seen a few.

1
Formbyman | 23 November 2011 - 10:27pm

Awesome fucking Wells!

Keep it dense yeah?

To be fair that article was written 6 years ago so hardly the voice of today's yoof.

And, I do own that record! It's well weapon!

0
Dr Volume | 23 November 2011 - 10:37pm

Call me naive, but I rather thought

that the point of writing was to communicate something. This piece really doesn't. It's self-indulgent poppycock. The Emperor, ladies and gentlemen, is bereft of clothing.

1
Mark JF | 23 November 2011 - 10:42pm

Another poor bugger who can't

stop himself dancing to architecture.

3
Mr Fade | 23 November 2011 - 10:46pm

I heard about this guy getting kicked off

I think he's pretty much persona non grata in that uber-cool, Pavement-worshipping, hipster clique now.

Anyway, I think that article's totally Mexico.

This does give me an excuse to link to my favourite ever Onion article though: Pitchfork Gives Music 6.8

2
Joe R | 23 November 2011 - 11:35pm

Hahahahahahahahaha *lolz forever*

That article's amazing. "In the end, though music can be brilliant at times, the whole medium comes off as derivative of Pavement."

0
Bob | 23 November 2011 - 11:53pm

Bob asks the important question. "Is it a joke?"

Please, in the name of all we hold sacred, let the answer be "YES!!"

0
Lenny Law | 24 November 2011 - 1:05am

you can take the boy out of editorial ...

The classicist in me craves grandeur - well crafted work with more to it than meets the eye. Put another way: less is more rather than instant gratification (the fashion business notwithstanding). Dance music is great but so is pornography (where I would rather be pressing new flesh than 'dragging my stylus off the same old 10-second loop', if you see what I mean). All the same, Intelligent Body Music is as much of a nightmare as Intelligent Anal and both are very dull. That means we are stuck in a rut where the immediate is supposed to be better, whereas the very best cross-genre material actually has instant funkiness with enough trickery for prolonged appeal.

It still doesn't make sense because I'm clueless about the context.

0
Glenbervie | 24 November 2011 - 1:34am

Um...

I am almost afraid to admit that I like it. Makes perfect sense to me.

0
SimonL | 24 November 2011 - 12:10pm

Melody Maker

Reminds me of MM, circa 1985-1993. Could almost be Chris Roberts at his finest.

0
SimonL | 24 November 2011 - 12:11pm

Keep feelin' fascination:

lookin', learnin', movin' on.

I found it impossible to read without Nathan Barley's voice in my head.

I loved reading it, no matter if it's sincere or a piss-take.

Surely he/she intended it to be funny?
Surely?!

0
andielou | 24 November 2011 - 12:40pm

Opining string braids and hushed sepia trimmings

This is from my favourite press release ever - please note this is just one sentence.

The feint and fragile ‘xxx xxxx’ is a gorgeously dimpled and wistfully retiring folk nugget, understated and touching and sounding as though aside being meticulously crafted in a woodshed it also appears to have partaken in a tot or two of moonshine its unearthed hidden there given its rosy glow and its slight though detectable off centred teeter, the blending of opining strings braids and the delicate brass beading eke out tender heart rushed flutters that dapple the overall effect with a hushed sepia trimming the type of which should see it endearing itself to admirers of the Heartstrings.

0
Captain Underpants | 24 November 2011 - 12:44pm

"fahks sakes...

I try a new sound, and a new PR person and you fahckers just laugh at me..."

1
ivan | 24 November 2011 - 1:29pm

RIFF JIHAD

I want that on a T Shirt.

Whassup, my nigga?

0
man.of.soup | 24 November 2011 - 1:17pm

Writing

In my experience, the best writing is also very easy to read. I find styles such as this give me the same sort of swooning nausea you get from reading in a car.

1
Spartacus Mills | 24 November 2011 - 1:29pm

I like Isolee

but this review does them no favours even if was meaning to. I started skimming by the thrid sentence and glazed over totally by the third paragraph.

So, was it any good according to him?

0
jimmyshoes01 | 24 November 2011 - 1:41pm

No idea.

0
Bob | 24 November 2011 - 1:49pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd