Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Size of iTunes library

John_Innes's picture

A report came out today saying that the average user has 7,106 tracks in their iTunes library. So, The Massive, how big is yours?

0

Groaning with an unwieldy

19,716

It's absurd, and I really have tried to prune it - it was over the 20,000 mark. But even removing 300 makes hardly a dent.

I've got to be brutal, but there's so much music in the world, and so much I don't want to be without, even if I don't listen to it.

0
Five-Centres | 5 January 2011 - 3:29pm

WHO has?

Please tell me. I can't handle the suspense!

3
STD | 5 January 2011 - 4:21pm

16,598

Or just under 80Gb of music. Stupid really. There's so much stuff I don't listen to. My iPad contains 30gb of music, and even that's too much.

0
Bob | 5 January 2011 - 3:38pm

After pruning and compressing...

...it's still 13,387 tracks or 33.3 days. I blame those damn Word CDs!

*looks up 'discriminating palate'...hmm...'showing careful judgement or fine taste'*

I think I'd better think it out again!

0
Gavin Adam | 5 January 2011 - 3:43pm

iTunes

I have put everything I have on iTunes (both music and DVD) for the purposes of streaming from the computer rather than using physical media.

Current totals are...
Music : 32523 items / 2707 albums (includes some music video material)
Movies : 624 items
TV Shows ; 4587 items (combination of TV series from DVD and BBC iPlayer downloads).

According to the timings it would take me just more than 300 days to listen / view it all. Probably too much.

Good job I have shortage of drive storage (4 x 2TB set up as a RAID5)

0
chrisf | 5 January 2011 - 3:44pm

Shortage?

Was "...shortage of drive storage (4 x 2TB ..." ironic or missing a "no" at the beginning?

0
Old_Nick | 7 January 2011 - 4:31am

typo

... it was actually a typo, but I'm now at 70% full so maybe not for much longer...... I think some 3TB are in order....

0
chrisf | 7 January 2011 - 11:52am

Too Big

Currently 49,929 Items - 150.1 days - 225 Gb.

But - someday I'll want to listen to all of "Tree With Roots" again or "The Complete American Sessions" or some of that I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue archive ...

0
el hombre malo | 5 January 2011 - 3:46pm

Way too much

At last check I had over 50000 tracks stored digitally, but I've still got over a 1000 CDs to convert to digital that I've never gotten around to sitting down with.

I only really use ITunes to maintain my Ipod (currently sitting around 22000 tracks). I've half a gig of space left on it, so I do tend to prune it every so often.

Which means I've got 1000s of tracks that never get listened to currently. I don't know why I'm keeping some of it.

0
SimonL | 5 January 2011 - 3:52pm

But I need it all.

Even though I may never listen to a lot of it.
I start going through it and think of really good reasons to keep an album I have not listened to for five years. Weird.

19206 songs, 1454 albums, 52.3 days, 464.64 GB (they're all ripped at lossless quality onto a external network drive).

Oh shit, and of course, there's also the VINYL to consider...

0
drakeygirl | 5 January 2011 - 3:57pm

*counts on fingers and toes*

51,729 tracks.

So, that's everything I love... but when I stick it on shuffle, I realise that there's also a lot of stuff I'd cheerfully never listen to again.

0
Hannah | 5 January 2011 - 4:58pm

How often

do you have to take a peek at what the track is thats playing because you don't recognise it? Happens to me all the time.

0
el toro calvo grande | 5 January 2011 - 6:38pm

Yes, ALL the time!

0
Hannah | 5 January 2011 - 9:05pm

Mine

Mine is just shy of 18,000 tracks. I think there's value in keeping most tracks, who know's when you might want to hear John Gordon Sinclair's Scotland World Cup song again?

With the Word and other freebies I drop everything into a "samples" playlist and then prune out the tracks that aren't to my taste leaving 6 or 7 then I'll follow up on sooner or later.

When I first started dropping albums into iTunes I only picked the tracks I liked but have gone back and filled in the gaps since.

0
John_Innes | 5 January 2011 - 4:58pm

Too much

59,209 tracks on 4,686 albums.

339.33GB that would take 175.5 days to listen to.

In my defence the figures for my Elvis Costello collection is only:

2,363 tracks on 196 albums

10.93 GB that would take just 6 days to listen to. Pretty average I suppose.

0
Neil Dyson | 5 January 2011 - 4:59pm

196 Costello albums?

Presumably a lot of bootlegs and live stuff - but presumably a lot of repeat tracks and versions. I am a Costello fan but that does seem incredible?

0
Andrew2 | 5 January 2011 - 8:41pm

Who doesn't need...

...37 versions of "Alison"?

0
Neil Dyson | 6 January 2011 - 12:46pm

12624 Tracks

60.28 GB 34 days 13 Hours 12 minutes
Have I listened to them all no

0
MrRadio | 5 January 2011 - 5:52pm

okay - next question...

those of you who think you've got silly amounts of music...post

a) the number of tracks in the bog standard 'music' list AND THEN
b) the number of tracks in a smart playlist which is the contents of 'music' and where 'playcount=0'.

Just for the larf, like...

0
ivan | 5 January 2011 - 6:47pm

Problem with that is

It would produce a skewed result. I keep all my music on a NAS drive and use iTunes to organise it, but I play most of my music through a SONOS system which doesn't record the number of plays.

Prior to that I used an imerge server which again I organised via iTunes and used Xiva to transfer from hard drive to server.

I've also had 2 or 3 different iTunes libraries due to new computers and previous hard drive failures, the last of which was only 18 months ago.

So there are many many tracks with a zero play count on iTunes that have been played a lot. Case in point is Nixon by Lambchop, must be one of my most played albums of the past decade, iTunes says I've played it once!

0
Neil Dyson | 6 January 2011 - 12:44pm

*head implodes*

wibble.

point taken; to put it another way, you don't use one iPod to handle all your music listening?

0
ivan | 6 January 2011 - 1:06pm

Problem Shared

I've just recently reorganised my music library folders to make it easier to back it all up to an NAS and in the process found I've lost 99% of my playing data. Almost everything has now started from scratch at zero plays. I too have also had all my play data erased after hard disk failures in the past.
I have over 50,000 tracks in my library and loads of CDs/Vinyl/Cassetes/Minidisks that haven't been digitised yet. I'd have to double my storage to get everything digitised. I'd also need a lot more spare time than I've got.
I don't use iTunes because I don't want all the iTunes Store crap that comes with it (and besides the download size is -huge-), I use Media Monkey Gold (paid for-lifetime licence currently £33.64) which handles ripping, tagging, levelling and album art for large libraries beautifully and - in a rather more limited way - podcast subscriptions and internet radio too.
The only thing I might possibly need iTunes for is to update the firmware on my Classic iPod, but as it ain't broke yet, the usual caveat applies.

0
Mike_H | 9 January 2011 - 7:22pm

Oh dear

45,558 tracks
230.13GB

And there are a fair few audio books, radio plays (and like someone above, lots of ISIHACs) - I guess at low resolutions.

263 days, 9 hours, 19 minutes and 14 seconds.

So, I'd better enable crossfade while listening - that should save a few minutes here and there. The rest is, er, easy...

0
tquinlan | 5 January 2011 - 6:48pm

I am clearly

not trying hard enough. I have a measly 286 albums, 3642 tracks, 17.30gigs, and 10.1 days. Puny effort, compared to the rest of you. Where do you find the time to rip it all, never mind listening to it!

0
policybloke1 | 5 January 2011 - 7:46pm

23510 Tracks

115.21 GB

It took many years to rip most (not all yet) of my CDs. Mostly I buy downloads now so they go straight on there. I need to do an inventory and rip all the CDs I haven't gotten around to. Then I might just sell them all!

0
GunsOfBrixton | 5 January 2011 - 8:10pm

I never want to rip them all again....

57,460 songs - 239gb

wilco -just over 1,000 tracks including live, I would think is the biggest collection

0
mdavies27 | 5 January 2011 - 8:50pm

A terrible lack of effort

Until reading the above replies I thought my collection (2704 albums, 118GB, 64 days' running time) was on the large side. I'm clearly just not taking this business seriously.

1
Cadabra | 5 January 2011 - 10:47pm

Funny you should ask

Because I got a lovely shiny new 160gb ipod for Christmas, as the FPO got fed up of hearing me complaining about having to take things off my old one to put new albums on.

I'm up to 32,058 tracks at 123.15gb, with 2,376 of those tracks being Beatles ones (and probably a similar amount of Beatles solo ones, once I've finished putting all the Lost Lennon Tapes on there).

How much would I get for an 80gb ipod with 21,000 tracks on it?

More to the point, how come my 80gb ipod could only fit 73gb of songs on it and the 160gb one can only fit 148gb on?

0
Paul Wad | 5 January 2011 - 11:23pm

it's a binary thing...

not sure about the sums exactly but i think that 1Mb, whilst you'd think that it's 1000 bytes, is actually 1024 bytes, so the capacity of the drive is 80,000,000,000, if you divide that by 1024 you get less than the expected capacity. Actually, I've just done the division there, and i'm coming in at somewhere around 78, but I reckon i'm right on the theory, even if i'm wrong on the numbers...

0
ivan | 6 January 2011 - 12:05am

2,376 is the size of my d*ck

…with 2,376 of those tracks being Beatles ones

That would interesting, since The Beatles only recorded 213. (Wonders how he's going to try and get out of that one.)

0
Marky | 6 January 2011 - 12:23am

Very interesting actually

They did a lot of practising before deciding on the 213.

2
Paul Wad | 6 January 2011 - 1:40pm

And..

I've got 1287 of those 213.

1
Neil Dyson | 6 January 2011 - 1:46pm

Ah was wondering how you were going to …

Oh really - and where exactly is this 'practicing' available? If you 'show duplicates', how many versions of Penny Lane do you have?

0
Marky | 6 January 2011 - 10:12pm

You seem very tense tonight, dear.

Back rub?

3
Bob | 6 January 2011 - 10:28pm

Yes I'm tense, was mugged on New Years Day

And thanks for the offer of a back rub Bob, although I admit its upsetting me a little. "Oh God. You haven't got one of those belly buttons that sticks outward, have you Bob?"

1
Marky | 9 January 2011 - 3:56pm

You need to look a bit harder

Showing duplicates isn't going to tell me that, because there is additional information (such as the take number) in brackets after the name of the song, but seeing as you're so interested I've just totted them up and there seems to be 17 different versions of Penny Lane. By and large though, the best versions of the songs are the ones in the 213 you mentioned, so fear not if you can't find the others. I must admit I am quite partial to the John Barrett mono mix of Penny Lane though...

2
Paul Wad | 7 January 2011 - 10:09am

Windows Media Player 11

No restrictive Apple library here...

22,380 tracks 1577 hours (just over 2 months worth)

303 hours are from Various Artist cds - Thanks mainly to Word and Uncut magazines.

0
craig42blue | 5 January 2011 - 11:29pm

Music only for me

Just under 40,000 tracks.

0
Billybob Dylan | 5 January 2011 - 11:26pm

Oh my gosh!

99492 items 265.5 days 585.70GB

0
John_K | 5 January 2011 - 11:35pm

Nowhere near those levels

I doubt whether I reach 1,000 tracks. Yet I still consider myself a music fan. What a fraud.

0
Austin | 5 January 2011 - 11:35pm

Not at all

Quality, not quantity. I've got one of the larger collections on this thread, but the number of tracks that I really enjoy listening to is much smaller! I could do with deleting some of the music off the drive, but I'm a bit of an obsessive hoarder.

0
Hannah | 6 January 2011 - 3:55pm

Only 12613 in Rock and Pop

and 26647 in Classical - but since I only ever listen to whole classical works, they're ripped as a single track, or single act of an opera, say. So a 4 hour, 3 act opera is three tracks. 931GB. 220 days. Rock and Pop form 11% of my collection.

0
PeteWingrave | 5 January 2011 - 11:54pm

One of the most ridiculous blogs ever seen on this site.

The days were when people used to compare the prices of their car, or the size of their manhoods were much more healthy ones if you ask me.

Me? 1304 and proud. Descriminating see.

2
Marky | 6 January 2011 - 12:27am

I disagree

Some of us have got sprawling daft music collections.

The OP asked - we responded.

It's not a dick-waving contest. Size doesn't matter in this case, either.

2
el hombre malo | 6 January 2011 - 1:30am

I haven't got a dick

But I'll wave at you anyway. "Yoo hoo!"

2
drakeygirl | 6 January 2011 - 1:41am

Yoo Hoo!

*waves back at drakeygirl*

2
el hombre malo | 6 January 2011 - 9:24am

40,940, but how to keep a track of it?

Which approximates to over 113 days and 227 GB, all kept on an external hard drive.

It is a never ceasing wonder to me that I can store this amount of music, but I do find it slightly dispiriting that every piece of music is now reduced to just another line entry in the great iTunes directory of my life.

What I want to know is - have any of you out there discovered a way to keep a track (visual,print out, whatever) of everything which is in a library this size, for easy reference remotely? Something like an app or similar which I could take with me anywhere on my phone or laptop, which would provide remote access to my iTunes library at any point.

This would save me buying yet another copy of Contra by Vampire Weekend, which I discovered last night I have now purchased 3 times over for no obvious reason. Any suggestions?

0
russellh | 6 January 2011 - 12:43am

I use Music Collector

I use a product called Music Collector that I first got to catalogue my CDs and vinyl. You can now import your MP3 library and have a database that you can store/print out/search on etc. They do iPhone/Andriod and web versions so you can check when you're in the record shop/browsing during the lunchtime at work.
They have a free trial version (http://www.collectorz.com/). I don't work for them BTW.

As for me, 30863 tracks, 87 days and 184.75Gb. I still have hundreds of CDs to import as well as the vinyl. And where I have imported CDs a while back I need (want)to import them at a higher bit rate.

128kbs is OK for listening on the train to work but as soon as you want something a bit louder, it sounds rubbish.

On thing I would ask as an IT professional is how (or indeed do) you back up all your precious music. If you get your CDs nicked then you can claim on insurance. If your HDD fails, you're stuffed...

0
Hairy_Smelly_Wet_Dog | 8 January 2011 - 6:54pm

Possibly over the top but...

1. The original library on my main HDD
2. A copy on an external HDD which I back up weekly
3. An online back up with Carbonite . This took friggin' WEEKS to finish (it's 220 gb, and I checked with my ISP that it wouldnt break any rules) but I think it's a great insurance policy. Now it's there it just backs up whatever is new. I leave it on all thetime and never notice it.
4. I keep a final copy on another HDD which is kept at my Mother-in- Law's house and I update every couple of months when I remember.

Call it obsessive if you like, but the though of ripping it all again is horrific, and there are fair chunks I no longer have the physical product for.

0
ainsley009 | 8 January 2011 - 9:20pm

Much obliged

Much obliged Mr Hairy Smelly Wet Dog. I shall get me hence to Music Collector as you suggest - sounds just up my street.

Re Backup, I am very pleased with my Musicm8 NAS music server, which rips CDs and also has an automatic back up to an external hard drive. Overpriced as a NAS solution, but it also streams perfectly and has been seamless in practice so far.

Occurs to me I'm still buggered if the house is razed to the ground, so I may consider an additional Cloud backup - I have heard of Carbonite as mentioned below, but I back up my other data via Mozy and may extend this to my music library also.

0
russellh | 10 January 2011 - 3:04pm

Interested

to hear someone has got a Musicm8-one of several products that have caught my eye, RipNAS http://www.ripnas.com/ being another. I am more small time at the moment, having about 110 Gb on a portable drive that I use with the laptop that has the CD drive (my older one doesn't).

We are just starting to use NAS over at the FPO's larger place, with one of these http://go.iomega.com/en/products/network-storage-desktop/wireless-data-s...
which has worked well for me though obviously not all its users are happy-though i am not pushing it v hard.

Would be curious to know what those of you who use NAS drives feel one should look for in a proper one ?

0
SpaceBoy | 10 January 2011 - 8:28pm

One thing struck me...

...the difference in quality that must be in use, just looking at the ratio between the number of tracks and the disk space taken up.

Is this a personal choice or not realising what Itunes can do in terms of encoding ?

Try this test. The same HJH sample 4 times (A,B,C,D) at different bitrates (128, 192, 320, WAV). Which is which ?

http://www.divshare.com/download/13699176-e7e

0
ainsley009 | 6 January 2011 - 11:31am

Honestly

They all sounded the same to me. I listen to the notes, not the encoding.

0
badger_king | 6 January 2011 - 6:02pm

Which was sort of my point...

...lots of stuff gets thrown around about quality but the truth is, most people can't tell the difference, especially after it goes up to 192k and onwards.

Of course, there is an argument for the higher rates -there's no going back once you put something at 128k unless you have the original and rip it again.

0
ainsley009 | 6 January 2011 - 8:30pm

originals

I always keep them. I assumed everyone else did. If I want quality of bass I'll crank the CD out of my good player - not listen on an iPod.

But ripping everything again fills me with a dread I cannot describe. I'll just wait until they invent the iBackpack with several TB of space like everyone else.

0
badger_king | 7 January 2011 - 4:55pm

The AVERAGE user...

...has 7000-odd tracks in their iTunes library? In High Fidelity, Rob and Barry reckon that you can't be "a serious person" without owning a minimum of five hundred albums. Given that they're music nerds created by a music nerd, that makes 7000 an awful lot for an average. I mean, admittedly, El Hombre Malo is probably dragging the mean up by quite a bit on his own, but still, I'd be very surprised if there were enough people with large music collections to get the average that high. Most people are pretty casual and unbothered about music, really. I know plenty of people whose iTunes libraries would be in double and triple digits only, and I'd have thought they were much more typical.

(Also suggests a massive amount of illegal downloading going on, too. But then we knew that.)

I'd love to see the distribution curve for the numbers this report's based on. I suspect the mean isn't the most germane figure here.

0
Bob | 6 January 2011 - 11:47am

Although, now I think of it...

...maybe the "average" music listener doesn't even have an iTunes library at all - probably just a handful of Michael Bublé and Take That CDs - so perhaps a survey of iTunes users is already sampling the more committed end of the music-buying public anyway.

0
Bob | 6 January 2011 - 11:50am

I seem to have quite a small one...

Around 11,000 songs - I could probably lose about 1000 with some pruning. I currently have them on my pc hard drive and backed up on an external one. My PC is about to die any minute - I just have a feeling. It struggles to even load iTunes these days...

0
Native | 6 January 2011 - 12:10pm

8607 songs

I think this is about right for me: I sometimes get bored of what's there and sometimes find gems I'd forgotten about. Looking at other figures I suspect a purge now might be a good idea...

I wonder, does anyone else bother with rating their tracks?

0
murrance | 6 January 2011 - 2:17pm

Of course

how else would I find my favourite tracks ?
Song titles ? My brain refuse to have anything to do with them.

0
Locust | 6 January 2011 - 2:28pm

34374

Going through a process of shrinking down to 128 from 160. Yes I know in some people's eyes this makes me a bad person, but I don't care. The difference in quality is so minimal to my ears, I may as well get more for my money as it were.

0
badger_king | 6 January 2011 - 6:04pm

Size does matter

I'm with you on that one. Until I'd read this thread I'd never paid attention to the size of the downloads, but I did a little experiment and downloaded the same song from a remastered Stones CD (Sympathy For The Devil, if you're interested!) in all the different formats and conducted my own hearing test. I couldn't tell the difference between the 128 version, the 256 version or even the lossless version, so I have now happily change my settings to revert to 128. I suppose I must point out that my ears aren't what they used to be and I have tinnitus in the right ear, but still, I mainly use my ipod on trains and listen to my itunes on the PC through tiny speakers, so I don't expect perfect sound.

It seems that everything I downloaded since June last year (when I had to reload my itunes after it went kaputt) has been in 256, so if space becomes an issue I'll be copying you and shrinking down. At least this justifies keeping hold of the 2,000+ CDs!

0
Paul Wad | 7 January 2011 - 11:57am

I was precious...

...about the quality, and spent far too long managing what did and didn't go onto my Classic when the library got too big for it. Then I ran a blind test (similar to the HJH one further up, but another track)and found that with most stuff I couldn't differentiate between the different qualities, so now I keep the library at 320k but anything that's on a portable I use the automatic "change to 128k" setting in iTunes, which keeps the library file the same but re-encodes the device copy.

Best of both worlds, I think, and now everything I have fits on a 160gb Classic and will do for some time, with almost 50gb to spare.

I've forced several people to take the blind test and have yet to find anyone who could definitively pick out the higher quality rips.

0
ainsley009 | 7 January 2011 - 9:00pm

Too many

80207 tracks

0
GregN | 6 January 2011 - 11:11pm

Perhaps

people here should get out more?

0
Prunesquallor | 7 January 2011 - 5:06pm

an mp3 player

does tend to allow that, being portable.

And anyway:
http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/content/help-me-i-need-a-riposte

2
murrance | 7 January 2011 - 6:30pm

Fair comment

Stand corrected, facing corner with lower lip sticking out. It does all seem a bit anorak-ish to me but that is probably the nature of the board.

0
Prunesquallor | 10 January 2011 - 4:00pm

You're right

it is anorak-y and it is probably the nature of forums in general. The other thing is that there's shit I never knew I'd have to learn about to have a music collection, where the most technically difficult bit about my old-school CD albums was getting the sellophane wrapper off the cases after buying.

Sorry about the sarky response anyway.

1
murrance | 10 January 2011 - 7:06pm

and anyway

http://www.wikio.co.uk/sources/www.wordmagazine.co.uk/blog-ulgU/contents

shows it is only 16.78% to do with high tech ...

0
SpaceBoy | 13 January 2011 - 8:49pm

And I thought I was bad...

A puny 25,795 items or 165GB.

I try to replace the stuff I originally encoded at 128 whenever I can as I do notice the difference - it's just a bit [adopt Cheryl Cole voice] dull and lifeless. No biggie when out and about in traffic as it were but when using tracks to make Dj mixes or for playing through decent speakers, the difference is enough to irk me!

0
daddyorchipsblog | 7 January 2011 - 5:12pm

I'm more average than I thought...

7945 songs, 18.8 days, 30.93 GB.

0
Andrew F | 7 January 2011 - 8:30pm

61,205

And I wouldn't do without a single one of them.

They are my little, tuneful babies.

0
Paul Waring | 7 January 2011 - 9:02pm

I did what everybody else does

and filled my ipod up with everything I could. As such at least half of the content was "filler" from free magazine CDs, or stuff that I'd taken a punt on, didn't like but thought I'd give it another try later. Somebody could have handed me the new Westlife album and I'd have put the bloody thing on.

A couple of months ago I took a leap of faith. I got an 8 gig mp3 player, and due to its size, only put things on it that I have heard and like.

I find now that by flicking through 50 or 60 albums I'm actually listening to a more varied selection than before.

0
mark0510 | 7 January 2011 - 9:58pm

A mere...

35,188.

No biggie. If meeting you lovely people has taught me anything , it is that if I thought I was deranged about something or other, there is someone round the corner who can see my derangement and raise me into stark-staring bonkers. But as el hombre malo says, it ain't a willie-waving contest. (Just as well...cough...).

Mind you, an awful lot of those are radio programmes, due for a purge. Though they are not doing any harm.

On the other hand, 1.75% of a disk left...

Of course, none of us are The Average Person. It used to be said The Average Person bought two CDs a year, the poor things.

0
Doods | 8 January 2011 - 11:03pm

Oh balls

Pesky duplicates....

0
Doods | 11 January 2011 - 12:29pm

Currently...

16,942 tracks, or 105.56 GBs. The Word blog is the only place where this is probably not regarded as excessive.

However, over 20 GBs of this is dance music of the progressive house variety which could really be edited to about 2 GBs, but I just don't have the time to edit it (or listen to it).

The artist with the most tracks is Joni Mitchell, clocking up 237, or 17 hours, 45 minutes and 25 seconds of listening pleasure.

0
Dan E Steel | 9 January 2011 - 5:54pm

A tiny

68029 items, 401 GB

Any 'heavy' users got any tips as to increasing speed and stopping that bleeding beachball?

0
tim tunes | 9 January 2011 - 10:30pm

Smart playlists?

My performance increased significantly when I made most of my Smart playlists non-dynamic

Click on name -> Edit Smart Playlist -> uncheck Live Updating

I had 20 or so that were looking for updates every time I imported or something changed in iTunes

1
el hombre malo | 10 January 2011 - 8:13am

Nice idea

Thanks

0
tim tunes | 10 January 2011 - 3:39pm

sounds a lot

16762. Sounds a lot. So does 105.5gb.

But iTunes informs me, and I'm sure it knows what it's talking about, that it will take 52.4 days to listen to that lot. Which given that I listen to music every day doesn't sound that much. Then interesting that tells me is that I actually "hear" music everyday but do I really listen? Probably not.

0
cradlerock | 10 January 2011 - 4:16pm

15,143 Tracks plus podcasts

I make playlists of stuff I've never played so for the past few months everything's new (to me).

0
clivetemple | 11 January 2011 - 3:54am

Thank you

I thought I was a sad person with 21,032 tracks* all correctly genre-ized and no duplicates. Thank you for restoring my faith in myself, I'm not as much of a nerd as I thought I was, although I not so sure about one or two posters on here.

* includes 459 I Haven't a Clue and 640 Just a Minute. Does anyone else listen to classic comedies when exercising in the Gym?

1
Glynne22 | 13 January 2011 - 6:03pm

the classic comedies are a grand idea.

I think I'll give them a go in the gym.

0
Hannah | 13 January 2011 - 6:24pm

Comedies Gym

Classic comedies are great when running, cycling, rowing and using the Cross Trainer, but beware as I found out laughing when lifting weights can be dangerous and people give you funny looks.

0
Glynne22 | 13 January 2011 - 8:04pm

21,870 tracks

How many Smiths Compilations does one man need?

0
doubleyoubee | 13 January 2011 - 6:14pm

As of 13/11/2011 @ 19.06...

19554 (or 58.5 days worth of listening...)

0
Reno Dakota | 13 January 2011 - 8:07pm

6408 tracks

as of today. So a bit below average, even on a 120 Gb Classic ...

... perhaps it's lots of long tracks.

0
SpaceBoy | 13 January 2011 - 9:11pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd