Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

RT OBE

Gatz's picture

This made me smile. I'm no fan of the royal rigmarole, but I couldn't help but smile when I saw this photo from yesterday at the Palace.

18

Shame

Why would any 'folk' or alternative musician want to be a member of the british empire? Or any decent person for that matter? What exactly does it mean, apart from maintaining the class system in this country?

I love RT but this just looks shameful.

3
Jorrox | 29 June 2011 - 9:56am

I kind of agree

But when there was a thread here when the award was made I wrote something along the lines of, 'I would hope that anyone I admire enough to deserve the award would refuse it, but that's probably just me being precious.'
As I said above, I'm no fan of the monarchy or honours system, but I wouldn't presume to know Richard's opinions, though I am sure they would be detailed and nuanced, or his reasons for accepting the honour.

0
Gatz | 29 June 2011 - 10:03am

To interject a brief factual note:

The MBE makes someone a Member of the Order of the British Empire. It's a subtle but important distinction.

0
Mark JF | 29 June 2011 - 11:55am

To the barracades!...

Jorrox, you go first.
(Congratulations RT)

0
shane pacey | 29 June 2011 - 12:17pm

Beard and no sandals

He does rock a top hat though doesn't he?

Q: what will Slash wear when he gets HIS?

1
LastRoseofSummer | 29 June 2011 - 7:47pm

Beard and no sandals

He does rock a top hat though doesn't he?

Q: what will Slash wear when he gets HIS?

0
LastRoseofSummer | 29 June 2011 - 7:47pm

Martin Carthy accepted an MBE

I have to say I agree with you though. Accepting honours from the queen is just not right. I believe David Bowie and Alan Bennett (and John Osborne) turned them down. There's a club to be in!

1
ganglesprocket | 29 June 2011 - 10:02am

Honours refuseniks

IIRC Benjamin Zepheniah refused an honour then made a TV documentary about the whole rotten honours system.

Very brave of him I thought.

0
jackthebiscuit | 29 June 2011 - 11:51am

At the risk of rising to the bait here...

... the titular head of his homeland, on being made aware of his work by her trusty team of advisors, chooses to publicly recognise his past and ongoing contribution to the culture of his country and the world - is he really taking on all of the country/empire's past and present ills by accepting? Really?

Yes, "the personal is political", but blimey, let him have his moment, and I'd also imagine his family are enormously proud of him. Good.

21
Metal Mickey | 29 June 2011 - 10:57am

Well its about time

i LOVE Birdseye's Fish Fingers

6
DogFacedBoy | 29 June 2011 - 10:59am

Well done RT

Shameful. Ha! What nonsense.

He looks thrilled to have been recognised for doing he does and doing it well.

Why ruin his moment?

9
Five-Centres | 29 June 2011 - 11:22am

"doing what he does and doing it well"

...he undoubtedly plays the best Richard Thompson-style guitar in the world!

The great Alastair Sim, incidentally, turned down a knighthood. As had his father, apparently.

But then, unlike RT, Sim almost never gave interviews or autographs - preferring to sit down with his fans for several minutes and explain to them why it was that he wasn't going to give an autograph and how it was demeaning to their self-respect to ask for such.

I'm sure he wasted a lot of time there.

1
Colin H | 29 June 2011 - 11:36am

If it's not OK to accept honours from the Queen....

....is it OK to accept them from other Heads Of State, as happens in, say, France or the United States?

1
David Hepworth | 29 June 2011 - 11:39am

I don't really understand...

what's supposed to be wrong with the honours system, other than the massive skewing of the recipient pool in favour of the civil service compared with other walks of life. I'm as anti-monarchist as the next right-on cat, but what's the connection? It's a national honours system, of which the head of state is the figurehead.

Refusing these gongs is fine. I'm sure people have all sorts of reasons for doing so. But refusing one on the grounds that accepting would somehow make you a royalist shill seems to me like refusing to go to a certain hospital because the Queen opened it.

4
Archie Valparaiso | 29 June 2011 - 7:43pm

Yes

but returning it because Cold Turkey was slipping down the charts was a good idea!

0
Bingham | 29 June 2011 - 8:48pm

Have you something to tell us, then, David...?

...an imminent Chevallier de Legion D'Honeur, perhaps, for services to international pop harmony? :-D

0
Colin H | 29 June 2011 - 11:43am

In the very unlikely event that I was to be given an honour...

...I would far rather get it from the sovereign than some passing politician or Michael Palin - or whoever's the favourite notional President figure at the moment.

0
David Hepworth | 29 June 2011 - 12:04pm

The point to note, surely,

being that the honour is bestowed by an office and not a person. I wonder if anyone who received an honour from, say, Richard Nixon or Silvio Berlusconi would feel inclined to refuse or hand it back simply because of their views about the office-holder, rather than the office?

0
Mark JF | 29 June 2011 - 12:50pm

I don't think you'd be "very unlikely".................

In fact 5 English pounds on you getting an MBE in the next 10 years for contribution to popular culture. (Providing you don't retire or worse).

The question is:

1. Would you accept it ?

and

2. How would Ellen feel ?

I reckon you could both get one at the same time.

0
marsonator | 29 June 2011 - 1:35pm

In my dreams....

.....I would get to the palace, queue up in my top hat and morning coat, make my way into the presence, shuffle my way to the front and Her Maj would be just about to pin the honour on me and then some Chamberlain would leap in and say "sorry, we thought you were the tall one with the big laugh."

18
David Hepworth | 29 June 2011 - 2:55pm

I'd love to be there with a hidden microphone...

"Oh Mr Hepworth, yes... one did so enjoy the anecdote about the anal cleft."

0
Patrick Crowther | 30 June 2011 - 11:54am

Ah but...

a second one would then say " No your maj, this is the right one - you know, your favourite parlour game?"

"Oh yes, I believe it's Pheelip's turn to play Geldof tonight - 'Give us your fockin' money!' Most amusing - enough to make one rattle one's jewellery!"

0
Lando Cakes | 2 July 2011 - 1:36pm

First time for everything

I've been reading your stuff, David, since at least Q3 and I can't remember disagreeing with you more than I do on this point.

A 'notional' president has the slight advantage of being democratically elected (Dubya not withstanding).

The monarchy in this country is the thread that holds the whole upper class/ establishment together.

I'd rather have Michael Palin anyday rather than that Prisoner Of Zenda wedding farce of a couple of months back.

1
Jorrox | 30 June 2011 - 11:50am

Do you think...

...getting rid of the royals would have any effect on the class system? Seriously?

0
Bob | 30 June 2011 - 12:33pm

I can't see it

America has a class system despite no monarchy.

0
Spartacus Mills | 30 June 2011 - 12:40pm

Exactly.

Everywhere has an aristocracy. Everywhere. It's just that not all countries call it that.

0
Bob | 30 June 2011 - 1:38pm

Try France

They executed their royalty and aristos hundreds of years ago and it is riddled with class and status, far more so than here. Love France though I do, "Liberté, égalité, fraternité" largely hinges upon being rich, white, old French, and ideally male.

0
Twangothan | 30 June 2011 - 2:40pm

Indeed

Class does seem to be a human need, or human failing.

But the monarchy and the house of lords and the honours system institutionalises it.

I can't say I know France as well as some but I'd much rather sing their anthem than ours. I don't want anyone reigning over me, thanks all the same.

The very thought of someone using 'your majesty' makes me chuckle. Point to something majestic about that shower please.

2
Jorrox | 30 June 2011 - 6:36pm

Too right

I totallly agree. The whole idea of "lords", monarchy, us commoners etc is totally outdated. That's what saddened me about the royal wedding - the idea that we define ourselves by such ridiculous pageantry underpinned by the idea that these are our future rulers to whom we genuflect sickens me. Not that I watched a second of it.

1
Twangothan | 1 July 2011 - 2:08pm

I din't come here

for a lecture on communism, young lady....

0
DogFacedBoy | 1 July 2011 - 3:30pm

Watching

My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding recently, it suddenly became very clear why we still have a class system.

0
mojoworking | 1 July 2011 - 11:33pm

Its that honarary degree

from the University of Please Yourself, California

0
DogFacedBoy | 29 June 2011 - 11:46am

Incidentally

RT is also receiving an honorary doctorate from the University of Aberdeen this week.

0
Gatz | 29 June 2011 - 11:47am

now that's

an evil bunch i wouldn't accept an award from.

2
Sour Crout | 29 June 2011 - 12:57pm

Pah!

An excellent University (why, I have one of their degrees myself) and a much better honour than anything from Liz Windsor.

0
Lando Cakes | 29 June 2011 - 8:35pm

I really, really...

...want someone to use the word "lickspittle". That'd make my day.

0
Bob | 29 June 2011 - 11:46am

One day,

Terry Wogan, Ken Bruce and Jo Whiley were having a cup of coffee in the BBC canteen. Wogan went to get an extra sachet of sugar from the counter and while he was away, Bruce confessed to Whiley that he had a fetish for sucking the sweat from under the arms of athletes. Whiley recoiled in horror, but couldn't say anything else because at that moment, Wogan came back with his sachet of sugar (and a naughty cream bun he'd also purchased).

The trio finished their coffee and Bruce had to head off to begin his Radio 2 show. Wogan and Whiley sat there for a while longer with Whiley visibly distressed. Wogan picked up on this:

"What's wrong, Jo?" he asked.

"I've just found out something disturbing about Ken," she replied.

"What?" said Wogan, perplexed.

"He licks 'pit, Tel."

4
Joe R | 29 June 2011 - 12:05pm

Get out.

1
Bob | 29 June 2011 - 12:11pm

That took me AGES

you unappreciative wretch.

0
Joe R | 29 June 2011 - 12:30pm

Give Bob a break.

He'll be gutted the royals have come out as puritan rockists.

0
Mr Fade | 29 June 2011 - 12:41pm

Hmmm...

Nah, I won't.

I believe LS Lowry holds the record for refused honours, turning down everything from an MBE to a peerage.

Top bloke.

0
Paolo Meccano | 29 June 2011 - 12:38pm

Lickspittle

I aim to please.

1
JoLean | 29 June 2011 - 11:49am

Toady..

0
Lenny Law | 29 June 2011 - 12:42pm

Milquetoast...

 

1
Dr.Pill | 29 June 2011 - 12:50pm

Quisling.

0
Bob | 29 June 2011 - 1:44pm

...Cuthbert, Dibble, Grub!

.

6
skirky | 29 June 2011 - 2:05pm

Even the Nobel Prize...

... has dubious origins, Alfred Nobel was a weapons manufacturer.

I'm not going to pretend my dislike of the royals is rational, as far as I'm concerned they are a mediocre shower of tax parasites whose luxurious lifestyle I truly object to funding. I'd rather my taxes allowed bin men and teachers a half decent pension.

However accepting a prize from a head of state who has been elected at least has the appearance of being a vaguely democratic and meritocratic decision so I dont object to that.

4
ganglesprocket | 29 June 2011 - 11:53am

Mediocre shower of tax parasites

Another way to look at this: they get £40,000,000 per year from the civil list. In return, government coffers are swelled by £200,000,000 annual rental income from crown lands that the royal family still own. It's an actual swap, one you can blame George III and the then-government for. Take away the civil list, they take back the rental money, and your taxes go up, not down. I'm no royalist, but the tax argument really only stacks up if you ignore half the equation.

1
Bela Legosis Dad | 29 June 2011 - 12:21pm

Judging by your sums...

... we don't need to pay them from the civil list at all then if rent from land ownership provides them with another annual fortune. If government coffers are swollen by £200,000,000 then how much are royal family coffers swollen?

These figures make them look worse frankly.

0
ganglesprocket | 29 June 2011 - 12:35pm

They get no rent from Crown lands

The government gets it all.

When George III was short of cash, he made a deal with parliament: you give me an annual sum, and in return you have have ALL of the rental money from crown lands. Parliament gambled that this would work out in their favour, and it did. Every subsequent monarch has been subject to the same deal.

0
Bela Legosis Dad | 29 June 2011 - 12:44pm

Then I stand corrected.

But one mad king making a deal which was less good for his stupendously wealthy family does not make them value for money in the greater scheme of things. Doesn't Prince Charles get a private income from the duchy of Cornwall? This weeks news reports on his income seem to suggest so.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10447300

Maybe the monarch makes less money than she might via the civil list but her family are far from breadline. Let them pay for her.

0
ganglesprocket | 29 June 2011 - 1:20pm

I don't seem to be able to find ...

...the down arrow - is my computer broken? ;-)

0
Topjukes | 29 June 2011 - 2:04pm

Private Income

Yes, he takes a private income from the Duchy, but again it works in favour of the tax payer, as he voluntarily pays more in income tax than he receives from the civil list.

0
Bela Legosis Dad | 29 June 2011 - 3:02pm

Amazing when you think he also

coaches kids football teams in LA.

1
Mr Fade | 29 June 2011 - 3:11pm

But my point is...

... one family make a ton of money from both the civil list and private income. That is a disgrace IMO.

2
ganglesprocket | 29 June 2011 - 4:11pm

And that's a perfectly valid viewpoint

It's also perfectly valid to argue that a true democracy shouldn't feature any kind of power granted by exclusive privilege or hereditary public office, etc. But the "burden on the taxpayer" argument simply doesn't stand up to scrutiny. At the moment, it costs you 65p per year to fund the royals. Revert back to the old system, and for the Government to balance the books - the retention of the civil list money versus the loss of the crown rental income - your tax obligation would need to increase by about £2.50.

0
Bela Legosis Dad | 29 June 2011 - 4:25pm

Why would the state lose any crown rental income...

... if the civil list was cancelled?

I'm now confused. Can I get this straight in case I have misunderstood?

Your argument is that The Queen is worth the civil list money tax payers give her because if we didn't pay her that, we as a country would lose crown rental income? Do you think for one minute I am suggesting that we cancel the civil list and revert back to pre George III methods of funding them? I am suggesting we dont fund them at all, partly due (and I do admit this freely) to a personal dislike of the whole notion of the institution of royalty and all that it stands for, but also because the private revenues made by the Prince Of Wales alone are more than enough to support that lot with no taxpayer help at all.

There are many iniquities in the tax system and I'm no economist or accountant. But it rankles with me that as a nation we still fund that shower. It's an argument which is pure emotion with me.

Still, I do cheer myself up with the thought that when King Charles is up there, republican feelings will spread. The Queen is held in too much affection for us to have much of a chance. I'm not convinced that that is the case with Prince Charles though.

2
ganglesprocket | 29 June 2011 - 5:22pm

Because that income would stop

We get the crown income in exchange for the civil list. It's a straight swap. If you were to take away the civil list and make them private citizens, they'd no longer be under any obligation to give the Government the rental income on their land, just the tax due on it. They'd be a lot better off, financially speaking, and we'd all be very slightly worse off, financially speaking.

0
Bela Legosis Dad | 29 June 2011 - 5:38pm

So I'm still confused.

Where does Prince Charles and his £17 million income from the Duchy of Cornwall come into this? Was that a straight swap? Some Royals get tax payer money, others get income from land? Sorry, this still strikes me as wrong in every way.

0
ganglesprocket | 29 June 2011 - 5:54pm

Sorry

I was addressing the "tax parasites" comment, and assumed you were referring just to the civil list, which is what most people think of when they think of the cost to "us". The Duchy question is something else altogether, and I wouldn't argue for a moment that his entitlement is by any means fair in a true democracy. And yes, you could simply confiscate the land, as suggested below, in which case they would no longer cost you anything. But the fact remains that under the current rule of law, the civil list - because of the trade-off made all those years ago when creating it - does not hit you in the pocket. Indeed, it's the opposite.

0
Bela Legosis Dad | 29 June 2011 - 6:44pm

We could, of course,

take the land from them.

We'd be much better off.

4
nigelthebald | 29 June 2011 - 5:58pm

That...

... is what I should have said.

0
ganglesprocket | 29 June 2011 - 6:04pm
nigelthebald | 29 June 2011 - 6:07pm

(Available for work

as a prompt.)

:-)

0
nigelthebald | 29 June 2011 - 6:09pm

I've been reading down this thread

wishing someone would say exactly that.

0
Lando Cakes | 29 June 2011 - 8:39pm

My piss poor arguments...

... are seldom worth reading.

0
ganglesprocket | 29 June 2011 - 9:14pm

And yet

I read them all.

Though that may not be a good metric for quality control purposes:-)

0
Lando Cakes | 29 June 2011 - 10:30pm

The Queen is 85.

The late Queen Mum lasted to 101. Even if Lizzie packs it in before senescence sets in, Charles III's turn on the throne - he's already 62 - might be pretty brief before William V takes over...

0
Glenbervie | 29 June 2011 - 11:08pm

Whatever anyone thinks about

the honours system that's a fantastic photograph and he suits the topper much more than his beret.

5
Mr Fade | 29 June 2011 - 11:55am

Where's DG when you need her?

The only thing that photo is missing is a monocle. And possibly some spats.

0
skirky | 29 June 2011 - 1:16pm

You're right...

...he should chuck beret.

8
Colin H | 29 June 2011 - 12:04pm

Reminds me of an old Hancock line

Bill: I'm an O.B.E - Order Of The British Empire
Tony: Bill, you were ordered out of the British Empire

2
DogFacedBoy | 29 June 2011 - 12:12pm

he certainly looks pretty chuffed

good on him

1
Junior Wells | 29 June 2011 - 12:38pm
Lenny Law | 29 June 2011 - 12:44pm

Thats EXACTLY what I thought

And just to run over it quickly - Lovely bloke, enormous talent, doubtless agonised over it all, fair play to him he should be far more famous and successful than he is etc - but hate the whole parasitic Hanoverian hireling-of-the-English-ruling-class royal shower (though not as individuals necessarily Liz and Phil genuinely deserve respect - I mean apart from Andrew obviously. Oh and Edward - prat. And their wives seem pretty ghastly - still, just so long as they're where they are on merit eh?)

1
FakeGeordie | 30 June 2011 - 9:50pm

I wonder

what RT would think if he read this thread?

0
Ahh_Bisto | 29 June 2011 - 12:49pm

I hope he'd be delighted to see a variety of opinion,

some for, some against and mainly quite well put.

0
Mark JF | 29 June 2011 - 12:53pm

He probably posts,

enjoys arguing the toss with Danny Baker so I hear.

0
Mr Fade | 29 June 2011 - 1:05pm

I have a theory

That everyone on here is a media celebrity posting under a pseudonym.

0
Spartacus Mills | 29 June 2011 - 1:09pm

Except for David Hepworth...

...who is a media celebrity posting as, well, a media celebrity.

Unless of course 'David Hepworth' is by now but a shabby pseudonym for Chevallier Lord Sir David of WhistleTest, holder of the Congressional Medal for Springsteen Studies and several honorary degreeships and University Chancellorships.*

(* I mean all this affectionately: I'm sure we'd all be delifghted to see David and/or Mark rewarded in some honorary fashion for their myriad contributions to - as the local dignitary says of Alec Guinness at the end of 'The Card' - "cheering us all up"!)

0
Colin H | 29 June 2011 - 1:30pm

YDFMD

I'm actually Brian Sewell. I just like trolling.

0
ganglesprocket | 29 June 2011 - 1:22pm

*splutters*

Ahem!

0
Paolo Meccano | 29 June 2011 - 2:05pm

I'm actually

Michael McIntyre (shoots self in moment of sudden self-realisation)

0
FakeGeordie | 30 June 2011 - 9:52pm
Beany | 29 June 2011 - 1:38pm

Do you subscribe to the view

that their acceptance of a gong constituted a momentary lapse of reason?

0
Ahh_Bisto | 29 June 2011 - 1:48pm

Acceptance of a Gong?

I wouldn't dare to second-guess what the members of The Floyd make of Daevid Allen's oevre.

0
Lenny Law | 29 June 2011 - 1:57pm

I think RT...

has found his new stage outfit.

Well done that man. Couldn't be more deserved.

0
Patrick Crowther | 29 June 2011 - 4:49pm

It's a shame that...

Alec Guinness' character in Star Wars wasn't a real person. Obi-Wan Kenobi OBE would have had a nice ring to it.

4
Patrick Crowther | 29 June 2011 - 6:23pm

Crap star wars joke.

Which member of the Star Wars cast has the smallest bathroom ?

Only One Can Dhobi

I'll get my light sabre.

1
jackthebiscuit | 29 June 2011 - 7:13pm

Is that why he smells?

B-Obi Wan Kenobi

1
nicktf | 29 June 2011 - 9:02pm

But it's not from the Queen

It's a recognition by the state handed out by the head of state. Whether you think that the way we select our head of state is correct or not (I don't) she is nominally representing all of us in presenting honours to those who deserve them (and, unfortunately, a great many who probably don't but that's not her fault). Accepting an honour doesn't make you either a monarchist or an apologist for whatever Britain did over the last 600 years in the name of empire.

Well done RT.

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 29 June 2011 - 7:54pm

While no royalist

I'm happy he got an award.

In the grand scheme of things, accepting an award from the queen is certainly not as bad as his advocacy of homeopathy.

0
Lando Cakes | 29 June 2011 - 8:42pm

Well

done Richard Thompson....well overdue! hip hip hooray!

0
Bingham | 29 June 2011 - 8:50pm

Sorry

but who is he?

4
Dave Amitri | 29 June 2011 - 9:04pm

I wonder

.. if Gerry Rafferty will get one next year.

0
McLongWhiteCloud | 29 June 2011 - 10:02pm

Good for him

I'm not a fan of the honours system as it too often seem to be closely associated with political patronage, but if anyone's going to get one it might as well be RT.

0
Twangothan | 29 June 2011 - 10:19pm

One can't help but wonder, though...

...how it was decided that Martin Carthy should get an MBE and Richard T an OBE. Did the committee prefer 'Calvary Cross' to 'Famous Flower Of Serving Men'? Did they dock a point off Carthy for occasionally putting a finger in his ear? Or were there simply extra kudos for RT because he was happy to take his chances on the wall of death?

0
Colin H | 29 June 2011 - 10:51pm

I think we're getting a bit precious about this

Good luck to him. It's none of our business if he accepts the award or not.
After all John Peel accepted his gong because he asked the family and they all agreed why not?
And if The Dame turned down his alleged knighthood that's his business.
I personally rejoice he got his medal and look forward to seeing him in his topper and medal in the near future

3
Gordon Kerr | 29 June 2011 - 11:07pm
Beany | 30 June 2011 - 10:32am

What portentous tosh here I read.......

Or, at least, those "cool dudes" who feel that accepting an honour for services to music is a somehow an acceptance of all that is wrong with the monarchy (maan) and it's convoluted history with the country. As already stated, Nobel prizes carry also some not inconsiderable baggage. But, to stretch this point, as the giver of the gong is merely the (accepted) conduit of the gift, is there a feel that one should turn down any award on the basis of whomsoever is giving it? They have some mighty dubious presenters at the Oscars*, Brits etc etc. Does this stop acceptance?
BTW, Benjamin Zephaniah turned down on the somewhat different principle of having a problem with the concept of the "British Empire", a point he made well and sensitively, given his heritage. I am uncertain whether RT would feel the same to that level, or has the background to carry it off.
Just remembered, Marlon Brando turned down an Oscar because of the USAs treatment of its native peoples. Uncertain whether that makes or destroys my point!

3
Retropath2 | 30 June 2011 - 10:14am

Dodgy company

I can't understand why most musicians would want to be in company of those who already place the crown before of after their name (thanks Proclaimers).

0
Jorrox | 30 June 2011 - 11:45am

To reply to your point

"Is there a feel that one should turn down any award on the basis of whomsoever is giving it?"

The answer is mind shatteringly obvious - yes.

By the way its not just civil servants etc by and large who get festooned with gongs - its donors to the political parties, arms dealers, City luminaries, PFI gurus ....

0
FakeGeordie | 30 June 2011 - 9:57pm

Just for the record...

...I don't have views one way or the other on the honours system vis a vis people accepting honours or not.

My only view is that a great deal of people seem to be given honours who don't seem to 'deserve' them (pompous civil servants, bumptious bureaucrats etc) while a great deal of what you or I may feel are more 'deserving' people - whether creative arts people in some degree of the public eye or simply people who make huge contributions on a low key community level - get routinely passed over. The system isn't perfect, but that shouldn't be a deal-breaker in itself for people accepting.

I think Martin Carthy had problems with the 'British Empire' baggage aspect but accepted on the basis that, as far as he was concerned, he was accepting it on behalf of the whole oral folk tradition/his forebears. If that works for him, fair enough.

1
Colin H | 30 June 2011 - 10:42am

In my dreams

the ceremony begins as her Maj leans over to pin the OBE on and whispers to RT:

"One has always been a huge admirer of your work Mr. Thompson, especially that tune about the chap who rummages through his lady friend's unmentionables looking for evidence of her past dalliances. Although Prince Philip has long expressed a preference for the more uptempo ditty with the line about the 'half-naked women with her tongue down my throat'. Jolly well done and keep up the good work."

0
mojoworking | 30 June 2011 - 11:22am

Of course, there may be a simpler explanation

Dark Hand Over My Heart
Written by Richard Thompson.

Becky loved me and I let her
Wish I could have loved her better
On the day we pulled apart
She primed a time-bomb in my heart
Now there's a shadow hiding
Now there's a horseman riding
Lover of all broken things
Standing waiting in the wings

Sometimes I wonder why I love and let it die
Can't give, can't live just to hold back, hold back

There's a dark hand, there's a dark hand
There's a dark hand over my heart

There's a dark hand, there's a dark hand
There's a dark hand over my heart

You call me fraud and faker
You call me user, taker
You say I throw you scraps
Prove my strength by holding back
But I shine my honour brightly
Swear my allegiance nightly
But through my hands it slips
The same old demons paint their lips

Sometimes I wonder why I love and let it die
I can't give, I can't live just to hold back, hold back

There's a dark hand, there's a dark hand
There's a dark hand over my heart

There's a dark hand, there's a dark hand
There's a dark hand over my heart

There's a dark hand etc etc

1
Retropath2 | 30 June 2011 - 11:38am

When's The Royal Rigmarole

released?

0
Mr Fade | 30 June 2011 - 11:50am

...

Welease the Woyal Wigmawole!

(PS - Congrats RT!)

2
Adman | 30 June 2011 - 8:01pm

A Grand Day Out!

In many cases the criteria for the award to public sector people is recognition of charitable work or something that benefits the community in addition to the normal job.

Anyway I went along to watch my big brother receive a gong at the Palace and the whole day was certainly special.One of the treats for those observing is that throughout the occasion a rather splendid military brass band is playing music. Now as the whole thing takes a few hours they go through a rather varied repertoire which included some medleys of songs from the show. This meant that one person received their gong to the strains of Hand Me Down That Can O Beans from Paint Your Wagon and another to the tune of Bless Your Beautiful Hide from Seven Brides For Seven Brothers

0
Ralph | 2 July 2011 - 1:57pm

Genius at work

Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn. RT deserves every plaudit available. He is the man. And her Madge's OBE was just an acknowledgement that someone shared her appreciation of the 1952 Vincent Black Lightning.

2
stevedickychap | 6 July 2011 - 2:24am

It's actually a dishonour..

..to receive anything in the name of a 'British Empire' that kept 'Order' at the point of a bayonet, gun & cannon.

We've come a hell of a long way since the 1960s.

1
DeanDwl | 6 July 2011 - 7:43am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd