Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Robbie Earle fired for his part in "ambush marketing" at the World Cup

David Hepworth's picture

Jim White's piece in the new issue ("The World Cup You Won't See") talked about the organisers' greatest nightmare - "ambush marketing" by companies who are not among the handful who've paid fortunes to be official "partners". Looks like there was a case of this at yesterday's Holland-Denmark game where a rival brewer got 35 blond models in orange mini-dresses into the ground to promote their brand. Turns out that they got some of their tickets from the allocation of Robbie Earle who is there working for ITV. They're embarrassed enough to have fired him. Which begs the question, why are ITV giving Robbie Earle tickets for "family and friends"?

0

To fill the empty seats

presumably. I saw swathes of them on the highlights last night. There are clearly teams who should not be there at all. By expanding the finals to 32 teams and easing the passage of teams from certain regions in qualifying for the finals, the world cup is devalued somewhat. Who on earth would want to sit through that Algeria v Slovenia match, even without the benefit of hindsight?

1
Steerpike | 15 June 2010 - 5:26pm

Perhaps

the fans in the stadia get full ITV commentary and punditary. Poor sods. Would also explain away the vuvuzela horns, there to mask Edgar Davids pearls of wisdom.

0
TedLoaf | 15 June 2010 - 5:32pm

tv companies

seem to think that the best way of showing their coverage is better is by aimlessly throwing huge sums of money at it.

This can be the only explanation for Gary et al being in SA, when they could just as easily sit in a studio in London. The pointless bus. The BBC having several hundred staff in SA when about 50 would probably suffice.

I can't see any reason for any of their excesses, other than it's a mindset that's well set within both institutions.

0
Simon Ford | 15 June 2010 - 5:40pm

I don't think it can be to fill the empty seats

If that was the case the drinks company wouldn't have been buying them off the people who had them. I don't think TV companies throw money at events like these to make an impression but it is a fact of life that if a company - any company - has a relationship with a high-profile event that a lot of people really want to go to, then the number of people from that company who decide that they simply *have* to be there will just grow and grow.

0
David Hepworth | 15 June 2010 - 6:02pm

I assume any company putting money into the tournament

may get a complimentary allocation of seats, particulalry for the smaller games. It may be a spurious comparison, but when I worked for Bass, as sponsors of the Carling Premiership, Bass had comped tickets for every fixture. The top games were held back for customers, but there were always tickets free if you weren't fussy - I recall being begged to attend a mid-week match at Norwich as the entire allocation hadn't shifted.

No-one told a collague of mine that tickets came with full wine and dine. He went to see his beloved Everton wearing a replica shirt thinking he'd be out on the terraces. It was a long old afternoon sat in an exec box with a bunch of suits from the local cash and carry chain, none of whom seemed to know anything about football.

Quite why Robbie had so many tickets is hard to imagine. Maybe it's ITV's entire allocation?

0
fortuneight | 15 June 2010 - 6:05pm

Not sure about the tickets

but last time (sorry if this in the piece not read it yet) the dutch fans were stripped of their promotional lederhosen and had to attend the game in their underclothes. When I first saw this story did wonder if that was part for the ploy of brewery I mean 35 semiclad young women would never get any tv coverage would it now.

ps: we'll hear loads more about this sponsorship pressure nonsensse when the Olympics hit London as every kebab house and beer off is sued for cashing in the games

0
Chris G | 15 June 2010 - 6:16pm

I was at England v Argentina in Japan

And my (non transferable) ticket was stamped 'His Excellency The President of Nigeria'. No-one stopped me at the turnstiles. Perhaps the Japanese think we all look the same?

4
clivetemple | 15 June 2010 - 6:18pm

I want to see a picture of you....

...with that ticket. Please.

2
David Hepworth | 15 June 2010 - 6:38pm

Sorry

It was on the ticket and they just gave me the stub back. Pity I didn't think at the time.

0
clivetemple | 16 June 2010 - 9:10am

If Idi Amin ever went to the World Cup...

do you think his ticket was stamped "His Excellency President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Idi Amin, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Sea, and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular"?

7
Patrick Crowther | 15 June 2010 - 6:58pm

and

king of Scotland?

1
milesc | 15 June 2010 - 7:08pm

Hail

Big Massa!

1
James Blast | 15 June 2010 - 9:34pm

Lord Mandelson

Wouldn't be able to fit all his titles on it unless they made A3 size tickets. At least they're prefaced "ex" now!

0
Mark JF | 15 June 2010 - 10:08pm

strange but true

for all the security precautions, 'names on tickets' etc etc, the sheer fact of 60,000 or so people turning up at a stadium in the 30-45 mins before kick off means that local staff are not going to be too fussy as long as you have a valid ticket

i worried about getting into the 2005 Champs League final with a ticket that had an Italian name on it, but the Turkish security people didn't bat an eyelid (my only words of Italian are si, no, grazie, gol! and things relating to pasta) ... ditto a game at France '98 when i went to see a Colombia game with one of the Colombian FA's allocation which i'd bought in Lyon that day ... although all the dark-haired, olive-skinned dudes with yellow shirts did look slightly nonplussed that a freckled scotsman was sitting among them in their 'tribune'...

1
Glenbervie | 16 June 2010 - 11:38am

Pedant's Corner

My eyesight may not be what it once was but I could swear they're blonde rather than blond ... sorry

1
Kevin Woolard | 15 June 2010 - 9:42pm

Un

Believable. It is so obvious that wearing orange would make them stand out. At a Holland game.

I could have sworn I saw someone waving the current edition of The Word at the England game. That's Mark Ellen for the Bloody Tower then.

0
Beany | 15 June 2010 - 10:31pm

Faced with 35 blonde models in mini-dresses

...what would you do?

0
David Sutherland | 16 June 2010 - 9:04am

Faint.

.

0
Patrick Crowther | 16 June 2010 - 10:16am

Some day Patrick...

...I must talk you through the correct answer to that question!!

0
Iainso | 16 June 2010 - 10:49am

I know what the correct answer is!

But I'd still faint.

2
Patrick Crowther | 16 June 2010 - 4:01pm

Fair point.

!

0
Iainso | 16 June 2010 - 7:13pm

I was going to berate you, Mr Hepworth,

..for posting a total non story. Then I realised, its not that, its a bloody scandal.

Driven by fear, and the mighty dollar (rand, pound, euro, whatever), FIFA and their advertising partners (Official Drill Bit Suppliers to The World Cup, anyone?) are prepared, yet again to line the pockets of the legal profession because an "unauthorised" company has had the nerve to pull a stunt.

Oh, much wailing and gnashing of teeth must surely follow, as Budweiser (other beers are available) realise that this may cost them 1/10000000th of their potential revenue from this corporate orgy of advertising, due to 35 ladies in orange at a Dutch match.

Utterly ridiculous, and scandalous. Chris G hits the nail on the head above:

ps: we'll hear loads more about this sponsorship pressure nonsensse when the Olympics hit London as every kebab house and beer off is sued for cashing in the games

God help any onion ring vendor who inadvertently hands out a plate of 5 rings in "that" shape.

Grr...etc..etc...where are my slippers....?

0
Iainso | 16 June 2010 - 10:47am

actually...

isn't this the best outcome for the beer brand advertised by the guerrilla marketeers? Had the lassies turned up at the game, been seen by a proportion of people in or around the stadium for Netherlands v Denmark, then the impac would have been minimal. Had they even appeared on TV as camera operators panned round the crowd looking for babes, how many people would have twigged they were advertising 'the wrong beer'? But if they get kicked out, Earle gets sacked and it all becomes A Story, then we all get to hear about the beer. (Bavaria, now mentioned in all media outlets, and here in this sentence.)

Winners: Bavaria beer and its marketing dept
Losers: Earle and any of the dress-wearing women who actually wanted to see the game

0
Glenbervie | 16 June 2010 - 11:14am

Agreed.

The fuss being made will obviously help the Bavaria brand.

My gripe is that Fifa are even going to the bother of considering legal action, which will be expensive (is there any money left for grass roots development?) and counter productive (have you ever drank Bavaria? I haven't, but hey, I'll maybe try it now!).

0
Iainso | 16 June 2010 - 11:23am

Didn't they do this before?

I thought this same company did this before, was it at the Euros?

0
clivetemple | 16 June 2010 - 11:50am

yes they did

it was the World Cup in Germany. The unbelievable thing is that FIFA fell for it again - kicked up a fuss that gave Bavaria huge publicity and a picture in every newspaper. It'll be interesting to see what Budweiser has to say about that.

0
Captain Underpants | 16 June 2010 - 1:22pm

Robbie Earle

Given the success of this campaign it might not be all bad news for Robbie. Bavaria might put him on a retainer. But I'm a bit unsure about his actual level of involvement in all of this. Was he aware a stunt was being planned when he sold the tickets on? Because if he wasn't then his sacking was grossly unfair. I mean, if he's not going to use the tickets, why not pass 'em on?

0
Martin | 16 June 2010 - 12:06pm

Ker-ching.....

Ex pro in "touting tickets" shocker.

All of em have a bizarre sense of entitlement and outrage when caught.

0
Six Dog | 16 June 2010 - 1:57pm

Cant and hypocrisy

'Fifa states that tickets supplied to sponsors and partners can only be passed to family and friends and cannot be handed to third parties or resold'.

I come from a long line of seriously breeding Irish Catholics but even I would struggle to find 50, still less 50 you would schlepp to remote Rustenberg for a freebie ticket.

So of course Robbie Earle was going to move the tickets on, what else would he do ? This is pure cant, and it is disgraceful that ITV have gone along with it, just because Fifa are embarrassed.

It is more scandalous that he was given 50 tickets in the first place. Is anyone in Fifa going to have their head roll for that ? To use the famous Scottish double positive : aye, right.

3
Doods | 16 June 2010 - 12:04pm

For the first time in my life

I just visited a beer website. I didn't get the connection between the models and the beer - still don't really - have they appeared in a commercial and would be instantly recognisable to Dutch viewers (or a more widespread audience)? They do a blonde beer - is that the point?
I don't get it ... but I'm feeling a little thirsty.

0
badartdog | 16 June 2010 - 7:37pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd