Entertainment For Lively Minds
Removing the Correctness Filter
Following on from the Carpenters thread below, where Patrick and Dougie make some interesting points about reaching a place where we can look at music on its merits, and not, as Dougie says, after running it through any sort of 'correctness filter'.
Over the years I have been guilty of applying any number of arbitrary filters that instantly classed certain types of music as inherently worthless. In the early '70s, to my shame, I had a 'soul filter' that immediately closed my ears to any 'music of black origin'. In the late '70s, my 'Year Zero' filter stopped me listening to, or appreciating, anything released outside of a narrow set of criteria (where the artists were narrow of trouser and spiky of hair, essentially).
Subsequently, and I think it's down to maturity rather than age, I think (hope) I have managed to shake off the shackles of the filters, and listen to all music on its merits and to find something to enjoy in most music that is out there, new or old. Some might argue that in doing so I've lost all my crtitical faculties and will in fact listen to any old shite.
Anyway.
I think the principle of the 'guilty pleasure' has been often and rightly derided on this site, and that's not what I'm talking about here. I'm thinking more about music which might have been commercially successful but never received an equivalent amount of critical acclaim, or where the quality of the music transcends the preconceptions of the labels put upon it. I'm not talking MOR or Pop specifically, although I would hazard that most examples would wear those labels.
I suggest to the Massive that once the requisite filters are removed, the following acts (as an example) have self-evidently produced music of lasting value and worth. Maybe not consistently, but often enough for them to be awarded the critical kudos they have perhaps been denied for too long.
Carpenters
Take That
Wet Wet Wet
Bread
Billy Joel
Emerson, Lake & Palmer
Stock, Aitken & Waterman
Green Day
So - I ask the Massive - who else deserves to be heard with the correctness filters removed? Conversely, are there any popular artists out there that have absolutely no inherent value, however open our ears and minds may be?
Or am I, as so often in the past, talking complete bollocks?
I need to know.
- More from Paul Waring.
- Login or register to post comments










Going out on a limb here
but I have a fondness for some of Andrew Lloyd Webbers's stuff, particularly Jesus Christ Superstar (seen it performed twice, once starring the bloke from This Life as Judas - the film version is pish though) and Evita (particularly Julie Covingtons's performances). Admittedly most of his other stuff is rubbish but I would defend these two to the death. I suspect the reasons he is despised so much are not always musical ones (ultra-establishment figure, posho, rubber-faced, terminally uncool etc etc). I may be alone in thinking this.
For the "no inherent value" I would nominate Westlife - so many hits, all instantly forgettable.
Lloyd Webber
I absolutely adore his Variations album, which is full of wonderful ideas, playful pastiche and just a genuine love of music. I also think that he still intermittently produces stuff that that I may not like but which is, at least, interesting.
The Westlife thing is bang on too. Music has little to do with it, but the ability to shift profitable 'product' does. See also Boyzone and Ronan Keating, a man I always think sounds like he could be singing about his tax returns for all the soul he injects
ALW
is a national treasure and should be cherished, not vilified. He has given immeasurable pleasure to the nation as a whole.
I really hope ALW
is not a "national treasure" in quite the same way as Cheryl Cole apparently is.
I've heard this bizarre and, let's face it, empty claim at least 100 times this week alone and now it appears to be feeding on itself.
Not at all
whether you like his work or not, ALW is hugely talented, and from what I've seen and heard, delightfully eccentric. Reportedly a perfectionist and control freak, but how many successful artists aren't?
Cheryl Cole...can't think of anything to say.
By Jeeves...
...with an absolutely magical set of lyrics by Alan Ayckbourn, perfectly in tune with the Wodehouse style, is a delight from start to finish and easily the best Lloyd Webber collaboration.
I love Andrew Lloyd Webber
He's done a lot of howlingly bad cheesy stuff, but the best of his compositions are within a hairsbreadth of genius.
The Phantom Of The Opera, in particular, is full of achingly poignant melodies. And I even love that Time To Say Goodbye song that he did for the World Cup or something. Oh, and Cats is pretty good as well.
He's often mentioned here
but Gilbert O'Sullivan's early work is brilliant.
Two I'd suggest...
Slade, particularly the early stuff
Electric Light Orchestra - who have had a bit of a revisiting in light of the Guilty Pleasures genre.
Not expecting the "See through the correctness, and Gary Glitter's music...." comment
ELO
Anyone taking against would be advised to go and pick up a copy of something like Light Years and, of the 40 songs or so, see how many of them they can remember and with what ease. I'm betting a lot. Even though I've listened to them many many times, I still find interesting things with I listen to ELO albums; even now.
Lynne got bashed because he liked the Beatles and because, like his old mate Roy Wood, had an impeccable ear for a melody. There is no denying just how talented a songwriter the man is. And he's got a decent voice too when you listen to the Wilburys stuff for example. It seemed to work a treat with the Big O's.
Everything comes around again eventually if its any good, you just have to wait until opinion catches up.
Oh I Love This And About 70 Others
Slipping into Guilty Pleasures territory, perhaps
Many great suggestions. David Gates is a truly great singer and songwriter, and I'm still very fond of WWW's second album, "Holding Back The River".
I would also go with:
Donovan
The Stranglers
The Damned
The Moody Blues
Stock, Aitken & Waterman
a lot of Hi-NRG
and I will hold a torch for "Hotel California", "Face Value" "Christopher Cross" and "Brothers In Arms" until my dying day.
Surely
it's carry a torch (or hold a candle) ;-)
I'm too uncool to know what's cool any more.
I agree with you, I'm also far more accommodating now.
Can I nominate a big stack of disco 45's, or are they already a part of the great canon?
For example Tavares, Chic, Odyssey, Kool and the Gang (not disco? - dunno), The Jacksons ("can you feel it" is surely one of the best singles ever), Donna Summer.
Kool and the Gang
Straight Ahead is the greatest disco record ever.
I'd argue that we'd be better off if the correctness filter.....
.....was more rigorously applied.
We live in a Cheryl Cole/Michael Jackson/Madonna fixated world.....and you want people to 'lower' their standards!!!!
That said, I suspect that Cliff's 50s 45s are still sorely neglected, and if the same man's 'In The Country' replaced 'Good Day Sunshine' on 'Revolver' or 'The Day I Met Marie' had been the Floyd's follow-up to 'See Emily Play' they'd be revered.
It's not about lowering standards
It's about appreciating quality wherever you might find it, irrespective of preconceptions or prejudices.
If I'd not applied my 'soul filter' in the '70s, I might have realised just how wonderful Stevie Wonder and Aretha Franklin were a lot sooner, and enriched my life accordingly. And to take an example from your post, MJ and his brothers were responsible for some of the greatest pop music ever recorded.
Similarly, anyone who dismisses Take That without a thought, is missing out on (probably) four or five absolutely peerless examples of pop music at its best.
In my humble, obviously.
That said, I did admit in the OP to listening to 'any old shite'...
And you are spot on with your Cliff examples.
Living Doll
however must be the only one of Cliff's hits that still sounds a bit dodgy even when the correctness filter is removed.
"Gonna lock her up in a trunk
so no big hunk can steal her away from me"
er, that's probably not exactly legal, Cliff.
To be fair to Cliff, he didn't write Living Doll
That was Lionel Bart, a man who (cough) 'knew how to have a good time'.
As the original Lyrics
of "Fings ain't wot they used t'be" will confirm.
Get Down!
Sorry ;)
I think
it's just an ageing thing..when you get to "that" age you just dont give a crap anymore..whatever sounds good etc Oh and that David Gates is some writer his first solo album is ALMOST as good as his Bread stuff...the Guilty Pleasure tag is a pain in the arse..as though we are only allowed to like it because Nudge Nudge it was once naff..cast off the goggles and filters, float free and enjoy what the hell you want to enjoy... like this:
We're Going To Change The World
is undeniably just magnificent. Last verse especially guaranteed to give me a lump in the the throat and something in my eye when I listen to it.
Matt Monro - Yesterday
That reads like a Viz photo caption
Take that
Broadly in agreement, I think Back for good is up there with the best of british pop.
I think TT the 'Man Band' are excellent, love the last album, & am really pissed off that I couldnt get tickets.
My work oppo reluctantly (as in his FPO insisted) saw them last night (& he is Mister "Landfill indie") & he said they were fantastic.
Erasure...
...seem to be seen as pure pop fluff (not that there's anything wrong with pure pop fluff) but they also had weird and wacky singles like Chorus and Drama and arguably were the first example of an unambiguous, sexualised gay sensibility in the mainstream charts.
Well...
Surely Bronski Beat would take that accolade? And their first single Small Town Boy remains a stone classic in any age.
Yes, you're probably right...
...and I'd forgotten how good Small Town Boy was.
Anyway, here's Drama by Erasure. Sounds so eighties but still sounds good which is rare!
Don't get me started
on bloody Somerville. Fucker nearly crashed into me two days ago on the Brighton seafront, him no hands on his bike, wind swirling all around. Tell Me Why is a cracking song, ditto Smalltown Boy, but until he does his cycling proficiency he's getting no praise from me.
Oh yes
Great pop band. Surely "A Little Respect" or "Ship Of Fools" must rank with some of the best pop of the 80s?
And don't forget
Sometimes and Oh L'Amour. Brilliant pop records.
It's Vince Clarke isn't it....
Little celebrated English pop genuis.
New Life, Just Can't Get Enough, Only You, Don't Go, Nobody's Diary, Never Never, A Little Respect, Chorus, Drama, Love To Hate You.
One of our best pop songwriters?
Funnily enough
I was thinking about this on the way in this morning.
A couple of Big Country tracks came on the iPod - live tracks. It started me on a track of thought about "are they a guilty pleasure" "they're actually rather good" and "they really could do their stuff live".
It started me thinking about how 'good' artists are assessed, and music that I 'love' on an emotional level, as opposed to 'like' and 'respect'.
I don't know that I reached any firm conclusions in my head, other than "well, I know good when I hear it', which didn't really advance my thoughts very much. Of the others, I think I can admire the craft rather than want to listen to it. ELP and Joel may get the occasional spin, but other than that....
Of the people you listed, I don't know that Green Day didn't get their moment in the sun. "American Idiot"still stands, politically and musically.
Green Day's an interesting one
I agree with you that 'American Idiot' is a marvellous piece of work and obviously it sold squillions, but I still think that there is a tendency in many quarters to dismissively lump them in with all the other American post-punk bands who are long on tattoo and short on trouser.
I am nothing if not predictable...
I'm hoping it's not just me who doesn't recognize them
but who are these handsome chaps?
Take a look at my girlfriend...
she's the only one I've got.
She's got a lovely beard
And I am sure you'l be very happy together :-)
I think Supertramp got it in the neck during the punk wars because they really gave the impression of hating the punks in interviews -and as I recall the two songwriters then extended this hatred to each other? If they had been less forthright and even more than that if they'd been able to stand the sight of each other and hang around for a bit, then they'd not be so overlooked. Discuss
I hadn't heard that before...
but my take on things is simpler - I think it's more the case that Roger Hodgson's "nads caught in a mangle" voice is off-putting to some (the vast majority of?) people. I, however, am most partial to nads in a mangle voices... Geddy Lee, Neil Young...
Nadless ...
... Pavlovs Dog
Nadless, Nadless, Naaaad-less
Haha!
Aah Supertramp
You're bloody well right.
Blimey Take That look rough...
.
Howard Donald on the other hand (far right)
looks in peak physical condition.
The world's gone all topsy-turvy.
If this means I have to re-evaluate my perfectly reasonably held belief that BoNo is an annoying yodelling twonk of the first water then I resign. You'll be expecting me to lavish praise on The Stereophonics next. Tut and indeed splutter!
Trust me...
nobody in their* right mind would expect you to lavish praise on The Stereophonics.
* I've just thought long and hard about whether to use his, his or her or their in this sentence. Use his and you could sound (ulp) sexist; use his or her and you sound like a bit of a twat; use their and it's grammatically incorrect. But it reads best so I'm sticking with that. Confusing at times, the English language.
'Maybe Tomorrow'
is a bit of a tune from Jones and co, is it not?
I'm afraid that pop nugget...
has thus far eluded me.
Not really.
It sounds like someone moaning for a bit then falling asleep.
Not correcting Grammar
Honest.
Responding to the "their" point.
\
Sin't that an epicene plural? (And therefore correct)
Gawd knows...
I looked it up on the site 'Grammar Girl' and was led to believe it is incorrect to say "their". But I think there's a bit of slack allowed here... it does seem to be one of the many peculiarities of the language.
I would have probably
avoided the issue and rewritten it as 'no right-thinking person'
There is good in everyone and everything Peter
But there are indeed some 'artists' who are beyond the pale.
[cough]Lighthouse Family[/cough]
[splutter]Keane[/splutter]
*ahem*
Coldplay?
Not a Coldplay fan
but there were a couple of things on Viva La Vida that I thought were actually rather good.
Were they the ones
(allegedly) written by someone else?
My good friend Paul.
I would dearly love to believe that there is good in everyone and everything but I defy you to convince me of that. For the prosecution I cite the following:-
Jedward.
The Brotherhood Of Man.
Musak.
The Mike Sammes Singers.
Tight Fit.
Amongst many, many others.
No Mike Sammes Singers,
no backing vocals on much British Pop of the 1960s. Most significantly, they elevated "I Am The Walrus" from something that was trying too hard to be "wacky" to being a psychedelic masterpiece.
No Pinky & Perky (and therefore a somewhat more boring childhood for myself and many others. Plus it sparked my interest in recording technology.)
And, most significantly in my opinion, the sound of the first 30 years of British television advertising would have been VERY different. Including many of the Kellogg's commercials of the era, without one of which we wouldn't have "Good Morning, Good Morning," thus coming full circle.
Altogether now, "All around the house, spring clean with Flash..."
"Objection, you honour ...
I would like to remind the court that the original incarnation of Brotherhood Of Man was a half-decent blue-eyed soul outfit.
For some inexplicable reason
I can't see the picture/video/ whatever-it-is in this message, but I can confirm that the original Brotherhood of Man had Roger Greenaway (one half of hit-songwriting team Greenaway and Cook), Tony Burrows extremely good session singer featuring elsewhere on this blog, and Sunny Leslie and Sue Weetman (Sue and Sunny) amazingly soulful singers (as on Mr Cocker's "With A Little Help From My Friends") who sang on some great records and were certainly more than 'half-decent'.
"Objection, you honour ...
I would like to remind the court that the original incarnation of Brotherhood Of Man was a half-decent blue-eyed soul outfit.
with the finest
of Britains writers, arrangers, songwriters, singers and session musos on hand..really..what is not to like?
The prosecution may rest.
But to extend the argument a bit, to know what is 'good' you need to have 'bad' so there is something to measure 'good' against.
A bit like God and the Devil.
So by being unutterably awful, Jedward (for instance) perform a valuable service by reminding us just how much better Etta James (for example) is.
And so Jedward are, in their own way, also good.
There's a famous musical quote that illustrates this perfectly but I'm buggered if I can remember what it is.
Dualities.
I fully understand the concept of loud/soft, positive/negative but I don't need my mind infected with dross to remind me of the many fine pieces of music I have been lucky enough to pluck from the maelstrom of life.
A turd is still a turd no matter how much polish and elbow grease is applied.
You cant put a shine...
... on a Richard.
According to the Mythbusters you can
Tight Fit's Fantasy Island was a great pop record.
There, I've said it.
Keanes First Album Is Great Pop
agree about the lighthouse family though
Lighthouse Family
The first four or five singles contained acoustic (i.e. guitar and voice only) recordings of the hit/lead track. Ocean Drive when performed as such is just fabulous. Goose bumps, chilled spine, the lot. Listen Without Prejudice. As George once said.
Elsewhere on this page someone has a go at The Brotherhood of Man. It should be noted that the outfit responsible for Reach Out Your Hand & United We Stand were a different band altogether - except for the name and management company.
Figaro and Angelo (by the cheesy BOM) were, however quite good (in my humble opinion) and on a personal note, I would sooner listen to these bits of fluff than anything that Abba did.
Well...
I'm saying "Local Boy In The Photograph" & "Bartender & Thief" are both rollocking good tunes.
So sue me.
Sweet and Gary Numan
Sweet - unfortunately they tend to be lazily described as brickies with eyeliner or some such nonsense. Fantastic pop singles, great rock b-sides and some top quality albums.
Gary Numan - Replicas, The Pleasure Principle and Telekon albums. All three released within 18 months, and they have aged beautifully.
I think Gary Numan has been unfairly chastised...
over the years by people who can't get over the fact that he voiced his support of the Conservative Party. OK, he's released some pretty tragic records in his time (as well as some very good ones), but that doesn't warrant the degree of scorn he's had to face.
Agree
The Pleasure Principle is a terrific record, and Replicas is pretty good too. It went downhill afterwards, but he was probably the first artist (in the UK at least) to make something pop out of electronica.
Numan 79- 81
I'm adding "Dance" to the earlier list making a run of four outstanding albums, all released by the the time he was 23. I have to say that I think Telekon is best album ever recorded.
I have always found that
the "Brickies with Eyeliner" thing was more of an affectionate handle than one of ridicule..great singles band..in the mid-seveties I used to go to a club in Manchester called the Stoneground ..I have never forgotten the crowd dancing to the DJ playing Floyd's "One Of These Days" followed by The Sweet's "Little Willy" ..inspirational!
Oops
Double post
I nominate Simply Red.
I like 'em. MH is a truly fantastic singer. The 25 greatest hits album is a fantastic collection. Great band.
Ella Fitzgerald
I am a big man. I am 6'3" tall, size 13 feet, and tipped the scales at something like 24 stone at the time I'm about to relate (thankfully I've shed a quarter of this weight since, but that's another story.) I've also been faithfully hitched to the same woman since I was 19 years old - some 16 years now.
The reason I mention all of this is because I was once asked what I was listening to on my Walkman.
"Ella Fitzgerald," I replied.
My inquisitor - a highly-educated woman (which is why it still puzzles me) - then said, "Oh. I thought you were married?"
"Yes, I am."
"Oh, okay..."
A pause.
I replied, "Sorry, Kath, I don't get the connection."
"It doesn't really go with your image, that's all."
"Why? What is 'my image?' Go on - I'm intrigued."
"I thought it was only gay men who listened to Ella Fitzgerald."
So, I learned two things that day:
1. That, to be homosexual, one has to be presumably shorter / thinner / less four-eyed than me; and
2. Ella Fitzgerald is presumably code for homosexuality in South Africa (where Kath came from.)
I didn't bother to disclose that I also have practically every note recorded by Billie Holiday lest she made me wear a pink star at work.
Ah, but where do you stand...
...on Judy Garland?
In spiked running shoes,
preferably.
There are magazines
that specialize in that sort of thing...so I hear.
Where do you stand on Billy Holliday?
On her throat ?
I stand here
The Man That Got Away is imperishable, and please don't put on Have Yourself A Merry Little Christmas, at Christmas, when drink has been taken (**blubs**).
Tales from the technical drawing class
Thinking, incorrectly as it turned out, that it would help my future, I did a Technical Drawing "O" Grade during my last year at secondary school. I passed the exam but what I remember is an argument between me and teech which lasted the entire year about the relevant merits of Ella Fitzgerald and Billie Holiday. He was Ella, I was Billie. Goodness knows what the rest of the class thought about it.
Responding to the thread generally, I have always been aware that some of the music I adore to distraction will be stuff I didn't like at first : this feeds into the feeling that as I come back to certain music I am in a dialogue with my prejudices. Sometimes the prejudices stand up, but the other night the brother convinced me that Grease by Frankie Valli is a pretty good record, even if everything else on the soundtrack is rank.
Ahem.
Sarah Vaughan.
Excuse me, Mr Percival...
...chap here wants to take us both on.
;->
Presumably,
she was getting Ella confused with Babs. Now that may have warranted a raised eyebrow...
But Babs is a great singer (also strangely attractive imho) who has released some fantastic records. There - to coin a phrase - I've said it.
Few come to mind....
Def Leppard
Supertramp
10cc
Eurythmics
Few of these are well loved by members of the massive, but for Joe Public I would imagine they are considered oh so uncool
10cc
Pretty universally admired aren't they? The British Steely Dan and all that?
If only for a few moments...
Renaissance
Cars
Cheap Trick
Sammy Hagar (solo)
Harpo
Visage
King
The Members
Angelwitch
Peter Skellern
Whilst on the other side, I shall gladly never again hear any of the following music press faves
Jesus Jones
The Redskins
March Violets, Blood & Roses, Brigandage et al
Any fucker banging bits of metal (NB that's not a cue for Jerry Sadowitz's gag about Norman Tebbit and his wife)
I've just finished reading Sammy Hagar's autobiography 'Red'
A good fun read written by a man who still believes in the redemptive power of rock and roll (and tequila).
I still spin his live 'Loud And Clear' album from time to time.
Whoah
Largely right. But I may need to invite you outside to reconsider your opinion of J Jones. I supoose you don't like Carter USM either!
I didn't mind Last Living Boy In New Cross, but..
I preferred them when they were Jamie Wednesday. Yeah?
Lindisfarne derided
Fleet Foxes revered.
How does that work? Their records are identical.
.
I've never heard a Lindisfarne record
that was mixed through the John Denver Echo Plate Of Doom turned all the way to eleven. Everything I've ever heard from Fleet Foxes sounds to me like something rejected from "Rocky Mountain High."
Yep.....
.....Lindisfarne were a terrific group.
Probably didn't help their credibility with the Gazza hit or all those Disco Party LPs that seemed to come out every Christmas.
The first three LPs are great though and in a compilation of the Old Grey Whistle Test programme on BBC Four a few years ago they stole the show.
Lindisfarne
First band I ever saw, excellent live, love them to bits.
Still are - the surviving members still play together
Perhaps its that they tell so many jokes and give every impression of having a really good time that makes them uncool
Lindisfarne derided?
I'm not sure they are.
I like them a lot, but am not aware of much in the way of negatvity. I think Alan Hull is generally considered to have been a fine songwriter and his premature death a sad loss to British music. The band themselves always gave rollicking good performances.
To be honest I've seen much more negativity expressed about Fleet Foxes.
Looking at all
of the above artists I like to think that I have always appreciated a song for its merits and have never let anything else influence my decisions.
The only filter I have had is when I was a DJ. My best mate was also a DJ and if he discovered a record before I did I hated it unreservedly, and he found several excellent tunes. I was never going to admit that to him though.
That can also be filed under Bob's Deadly Sins thread as pure envy.
The answer is to just like what you like
and not to care what anyone else thinks. It's always worked for me.
Undoubtedly true.
I just wish I'd understood that when I was 15. Or 18. Or 25.
No way you´re older than 25
Uncle Paul.
If only that were the case
Nephew Ola!
But having said that, I'm happier in my skin now than I was when I was twenty five - or throughout my thirties, come to that.
In part because I've given up worrying about what is cool or what other people think.
That´s one of the things about getting older/less young
You reach a point where you don´t have to embrace every single trend.
In your teens, of course, you were judged on what kind of music you liked.
Listening to stupid old music like The Beatles and Bob Dylan when Bon Jovi and Skid Row was totally, like, the best thing ever was something of a failure.
How come the kids in charge of deciding what´s cool are always idiots?
As the old guy on the porch
says in It's A Wonderful Life:
According to Skid Row
we were the youth gone wild, sir
Age
It's an age thing, isn't it?
There's a time in your life where you'll worry about what is cool.
Then one day you reach a point where you can confidently say: 'fuck it, I either like this or I don't like it'.
The Monkees
Some retrospective credibility for Head, but otherwise critically ignored. The top ten Monkees tunes can go toe-to-toe with the top tens of the Beach Boys or Creedence CR or The Doors in my book.
Wet Wet Wet
Saw them at Manchester Boardwalk during their "warm up club tour" for, I think, the Holding Back The River tour. I still rate it as one of the best concerts I have ever been to.
They were a good live band full stop. Saw them again here in Singapore when they toured the Greatest Hits album. This time in a bigger venue, but still enjoyable. My wife's comment was how come Marti Pellow's voice was so clear when singing but she could not understand a word of his Glasgow accent in the bits between songs......
Sweet Little Mystery
came on the radio recently and I really really really enjoyed it. It's a little cracker of a song.
Yup
As is Wishin' I Was Lucky.
That's the other part - denial in public
I always thought they were both great songs, however, I never admitted to it.
I remember the NME stepped out of character
when it lambasted Van the Man for insisting the original lyrics which 'referenced' Sense of Wonder were replaced. John Martyn was apparently fine with the more obvious tribute / steal.
Anyway - great record. Unfair that they are often now lumped in with the Westlifes of this world. Probably due to that omnipresent number 1...
Oasis - hurrah! Celine Dion - boo!
Yes, bits of Oasis' songs sound like the Beatles, Rutles, New Seekers etc, but no-one complains about The Jam's Start or 10cc's I'm Mandy Fly Me (to name but two) for filching from The Fabs
Oasis are greater than the sum of their parts. They have produced at least a dozen instantly recognisable pop-rock classics that have never dated and could only have been made by that particular band.
On the other hand, Celine Dion and other Foghorn Leghorn-esque ballad singers who bawl over tinny synth drums and a couple of chords always sound awful.
Start!
Are you old enough to remember when Start! was released? Weller got it from all sides for stealing Taxman. One can only assume the George Harrison was too bruised by Fabs and My Sweet Lord litigation to bother suing.
Lindsey Buckingham-era Fleetwood Mac
Sold a shitload of albums. How are their critical status?
Fleetwood Mac
I *love* Buckingham-era, big-selling Fleetwood Mac. This upsets my cool mates, who love Peter Green, but I don't care.
I like both eras
But the Green lead Fleetwood have always been cooler, right? Not sure why. Maybe because what happened to the poor man. Things like that have always been good for credibility.
I don't feel that...
the Mac's "bugle n' bedswap" years need rehabilitating. At some point over the past 30 years they became quite cool again. The trouble is, I've nothing to back that up and I might be wrong.
Interesting one, The 'Mac.
Now bear in mind my memory may be playing tricks with me here.
The first Buckingham-Nicks album (Fleetwood Mac, the one with Rhiannon on) was a bit of a slow burn, underground, critically-acclaimed piece of work...
...which of course paved the way for stega-platinum, hugely commercially successful, Rumours. Which was hugely successful because it was, whisper it, very very good (of its type) indeed.
Of course, it came out in 1977, which instantly made it a target of the Year Zero enthusiasts (of which I was one) who derided it mercilessly.
Fast forward two years or so, and we have Tusk. Which the world took a listen to, and decided it was bonkers. Over the years, it remained bonkers. But became bonkers 'in a good way'.
Finally we got to Tango in the Night, when the drugs and the money and the constant sex had begun to take its toll, and they sounded tired and bored. But still sold shedloads.
So overall, probably - apart from Rumours - more critically acclaimed at the time than you might think.
And there are some real gems scattered across those albums.
I think Tusk is my Buckingham-era favourite
It was the one that took me the longest to get into and was, as you say, bonkers. I like a bit of what the h**l is this?
Rumours is still one of the all time best sellers, isn´t it? I´m guessing with the current (and what is most likely also the future) status of the record industry not many albums released now will reach those heights.
How 'alternative' was it to follow up one of the biggest selling
albums of all time with something guaranteed to baffle and alienate 75% of your audience. Even now I still can't decide if that was a stroke of insanity or of genius.
Either way, Tusk is a masterpiece.
When you have to follow-up a massive seller
It´s clever to go weird. Because no matter what you do it´ll come up short, commercially speaking. If you do something that sounds different you can point that out in interviews as a defence, because you´ll of course be asked why it didn´t sell as much.
- Well, we were trying to do something different. We knew it would alienate people, but why do the same album twice?
Very clever if you´re in it for the long run and has a certain amount of talent. You´ll even manage to make an artistic statement, which is a nice way to attract people like The Massive.
I get the impression that, post Rumours, most of the band
struggled to get started on the follow-up and left Buckingham to get on with doing what he wanted. What he wanted to do was Tusk :-)
I've never really understood why 'Tusk'...
has garnered this reputation for being a "difficult" or "challenging" record. OK, it's not packed with radio-friendly AOR smashes like Rumours, but it's hardly Trout Mask Replica, is it?
No, but Trout Mask Replica wasn't the double platinum follow-up
to a globe-rogering trillion seller.
I think that Tusk's reputation for being 'difficult' is largely down to the reactions of many of those two million US buyers who were expecting Rumours II.
There were some hit singles on Tusk - I seem to recall hearing Sara and Not That Funny on the radio in the US.
Nick Kent reviewed Fleetwood Mac Live in the NME
1980? he said - rightly - if you are too cool for Fleetwood Mac you are too cool full stop. I think everyone I knew had Rumours regardless of tribe - and Parallel Lines too - they were somehow untouchable or maybe just sui generis. Both still sound tremendous too.
Not sure I agree about TITN Paul.
Tango in the night is the best FM album by a long way IMHO.
I can't remember David Hepworth's full review in Q,
but I do remember the words 'somehow young'.
Always stuck with me for some reason, probably because it's, like, true.
Q Review of TITN
My memory is generally OK, good in some respects and lousy in others. I have no idea why, but I can remember whole chunks of the Q review of TITN by heart. I'm almost certain it was reviewed by Paul Du Noyer, and included the following gem:
"As a British Blues band composed almost entirely of ex John Mayall's Bluesbreakers, they redefined the limits to how many times Elmore James's Dust My Broom guitar lick could be shoehorned into songs with different titles."
I was young, then.
Well remembered
but the Elmore James slur is unfair and really only relates to the very early Mac line-up featuring Jeremy Spencer.
Spencer was an Elmore James student/obsessive and virtually all he ever contributed to the band was, as the review says, variations on the theme of Dust My Broom.
However, it was the massively talented Peter Green's band and it was he who called the shots (and wrote most of the songs). Spencer's limitations meant that he was gradually marginalised and by the time of the third LP Then Play On, he was nowhere to be seen, his contributions eventually ending up on a solo album.
Guess who
Worked with Pierre Schaeffer at GRM composing proper, hardcore Musique Concrète (see some of his work at the start of the 1970s), composed some pretty epochal albums that are still played and listened to now, over 30 years after. Releases an album with only 1 copy in existence and auctions it, telling fans to pirate it on Radio Luxembourg on the one occasion it will be played in public. Then releases an album that pretty much pushes the envelope with the use of sampling, harking back to those GRM roots.
He managed to redefine some of the parameters of the performance of electronic music, experiments with the way music is recorded, mastered and listened to and generally still tries to things which are true to himself. Indeed, electronic music might sound very different without his presence.
Jean Michel Jarre.
But to listen to some, he's just a guy who produces dull, aural wallpaper. Meanwhile, partly because of their krautrock associations, Kraftwerk are fêted (which is no problem for me 'cos I love them as well). The inventiveness and the craft, the love of melody and the desire to do something new are shared, but one lionised and the other derided in this country. Not really fair.
With you there
I think the flashy live shows of the 90s spoiled his "brand", so to speak. To the public, he came across as a techno Liberace as a result of those shows.
JMJ
My favourite artist of all time. A 100% Absolute genius.
Last time
I mentioned my liking for SAW's output on the site, I was treated as a heretic. Okay this is going to make it worse. I have the first two Stereophonics albums, I think they are good. I also have all Keane's albums and like them too - much better than Cold Play.
The Feeling
I Love The Feeling's First Album
All chattering Supertramp pianos and XTC backing vocals and great pop tunes I liked the second album too
Twelve Stops From Home:
great record. Not so keen on the second one, myself, but there you go.
great song, great album
and I saw them play Hammersmith Apollo when it was still riding high in the charts. I've never experienced such an exuberant atmosphere in that venue.
Great OP
I too faffed around for many years trying to chime with the musical In Crowd, erecting aural barriers to anything that didn't come with the right critical credentials or suitably hip levels of self-awareness on the part of the acts themselves. Having kids has been a key factor in loosening the tourniquet around my listening filters. Hearing your own daughter sing Lady Gaga or Tinie Tempah releases music from its media/PR-centric moorings. I've increasingly found myself willing to take whatever comes my way at face value but as others have said on here, some music and acts remain tarred and feathered, despite the clear evidence of feted achievements.
Cliff Richard is a good example of someone who, I feel, has made some pretty decent records but is also someone who, in musical terms, is treated like a perma-tanned Jehovah's Witness knocking at your front door. Spitting Image probably had a lot to do with his reassignment from popular singer to popular target as did his own egotistical simpering antics, primarily derived from his God bothering pronouncements and self-canonisation references (e.g. his "Big fish, small fish, Christ on the Cross" shape throwing in more recent videos). In truth I suspect he's a probably a bit of a vain div, someone who lives these days in a world where he's always confusing Harry Webb with Cliff Richard and can't really cope without a daily dose of fawning adulation from someone.
That said, stuff like Devil Woman, Carrie and We Don't Talk Anymore are great MOR pop songs.
they are good
but not as good as his early pop singles
I consciously
didn't choose his early stuff as that remains largely admired or at least acknowledged but there has been a tendency to look at "Cliff in Colour" solely from the perspective of his Christmas singles.
But doesn't he look great with The Shadows? As Paul says, take off the Correctness Filter, blank out Daddy's Home and there is Britain's answer to Elvis.
We Don't Talk...
On the backing vocals...
"Sheee-eee-eee-eee-eeep!"
Oh yes, worth it for that alone
Is it just me?
But reading through all this thread, apart from Ella Fitzgerald, two 10cc & two Fleetwood Mac albums (maybe the odd song here & there - New Rose springs to mind) I could happily live without the lot of them!
Each to their own, I guess but shame on you for neglecting soul music for so long.
Shame on me indeed.
But I got there in the end.
For a person who grew up in the 50s and 60s....
.....to sideline black music would have been ridiculous and, of course, Elvis, Dylan, The Stones, Dusty, The Beatles etc. all championed blues and soul to the hilt.
However, I'd suggest (and I'm ducking as I write this) that to dismiss black music in, say, the Philly Soul dirge of the 1970s, the dire 1980s and beyond is a mark of very, very good taste.
(Mind you, it's not a bad time to dismiss white music, either!)
That's remarkable
There was so much great soul music in the 70s and 80s. I don't know where to start.
Ranger does.
Or, more accurately, he thinks he knows where to finish. His view is - and correct me if I'm being unfair - that in thousands of years of human musical endeavour, the only bit worth bothering with is the fifteen or twenty years ending in 1969.
An idiosyncratic view, but he's commendably consistent if nothing else.
In this case he's nearly right
The last true soul record was Johnnie Taylor's Taylored in Silk in 1973, scientists have recently confirmed.
Philly Soul dirge!
I loved the Philly sound of the 70's.
Surely you can't be including bands like Harold Melvin and the Blue notes or the O Jays in that category?
You didn't duck low enough ;-)
Here's The O Jays singing Back Stabbers
I will however concede that they dance like your Dad at a wedding...
Maybe its Top Of The Pops to blame
In the midst of IRA bombing, Rhodesia crisis, 3 day week, general malaise after the Fabs breakup, imminent nuclear holocaust, strikes, failure of national teams to do well or even qualify for major tournaments (Liverpool & Forest did OK as I recall but I didn't care about them) - all that wide lapelled soul vitality seemed to be mocking us. And being introduced by Diddy David Hamilton. Often experienced in black and white as well which removed even more of the glamour.
And there was pity too - the poor bastards would then have to go and play some awful ballroom in Dunstable or on the fringes of some US airbase and share a dressing room with one of the many touring versions of the Drifters
Philly soul!
Not too much of that around here.
Recommended: The Philly Sound - Kenny Gumble, Leon Huff & The Story Of Brotherly Love (1966-1976). Three CDs, never knowingly over arranged.
Or this? Can the whites sing the Philly?
Just check out the C.L.O.T.H.E.S.
.....and compare to Marvin Gaye circa Ready Steady Go 1965.
Or The Miracles.
Go on.
Compare the clothes.
What are they wearing?
They look like contestants in the 'Generation Game'!
Philly.....dire music and even worse clothes.
But, hey, it's just my take on it.
American early '80s pop rock
I'm not quite sure what the genre was called, but it was very big when I was a young whippersnapper and I loathed it, not least because it was deeply unfashionable: REO Speedwagon, Styx, Toto, Chicago, Journey that sort of thing. Big choruses, big hair, vests, histrionic guitar solos, chunky synth chords etc. I've become rather partial to things like "Rosanna", "Take It On The Run" etc. when they crop up on the radio. May even put together a spotify playlist one of these days and have a good long wallow in the stuff. I'd also lump in some of the British pop metal that was around at the time: Rainbow, Whitesnake.
Ok,.......i may as well show
Ok,.......i may as well show my hand too, REO Speedwagon, there i've said it, if anyone starts anything Richard, i've got your back!
Also agree with people on Bread, King and ELO.
Wrongly bashed on this thread in my opinion, for what it's worth are The Redskins, i love that album.
Anyway horses for courses and all that,.......time to put some of the above on and unleash the Friday "liveners"
Kansas
Carry On Wayward Son. Brilliant. In a kinda overblown kinda way.
Carry On Up My Wayward Son
Oo'er, missus
'I'm not quite sure what the genre was called'
AOR
That'll be AOR
Adult Oriented Rock.
The very name tells you all you need to know.
But as you say, a few gems in the dross. Ace for singing in the car and drawing smirks from passers-by.
I call it Merkin Raak
as it's the phonetic rendition of what a be-mulleted bozo I met in a bar in Arkansas ( don't ask) called it as he sank his Bud and proclaimed "I juz lurve Merkin Raak!!" as Foreigner's unimpeachable "Hold The Line" did its thing on the jukebox.
Let's hear it for...
Yacht Rock
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yacht_Rock
Look what you made me do. I was avoiding this topic as Uncle Paul knows what a sucker I am for the Easy-On-The-Ears as well as the So-Bad-It's-Good genre of popular music. My Massive Mingle CDs are full of the darn stuff. I really want to be cool but at my age I've missed the yacht.
Now this guy is cool and was 20 years my senior when I saw him in 1976. I have this LP.
There's always hope.
JOHNNY GUITAR WATSON -I NEED IT
he may have been cool once
but then he was championed by Dave Lee Travis?
He couldn't help it
if the Hairy Gobshite liked him. I will, however, consider the following vocal performance for Frank Zappa in the plus column.
Johnny "Guitar" Watson was one of Zappa's boyhood heroes
along with Guitar Slim and a few others.
Here's an old version of his "Gangster Of Love",
which he recorded a few times, starting in 1957. The '70's funky remake is truly a thing of beauty.
He had an amazingly long career, starting in the '50s with blues and Rock 'n' Roll, into the '60s as guitarist and featured singer with The Johnny Otis Show. He recorded with David Axelrod in the '70s and then reinvented himself as a super-slick but tongue-in-cheek '70s-'80s funky disco dude. He died on stage in Yokohama in 1996, still touring.
Here he is again playing some classy blues-funk from his dude era:
"A Real Mother For Ya"
Stock, Aitken and Waterman..
As far as I can remember, (you hardly ever hear any SAW product played these days, even on Steve Wright), all those records featured a characteristic hollow knocking sound where the beat should have been, whilst the rest was all flimsy, insubstantial synths fronted by either Kylie, Jason or Rick Astley. Then there was the ghastly Yell or the ironically named Big Fun. Filters or no, surely SAW generated only dreadful rubbish :
Lots of dross
fo' shizzle, like The Reynolds girls,for example.
But, lest we forget, they did manage to come up with I Should Be So Lucky, Never Gonna Give you Up and Roadblock which, quibbling aside, are all just damn fine pop songs.
Fair point...
..on the tunes front. But that production stamp just ruined everything they did. To the point where I'm struggling to think of any latter day covers.
That production stamp
was sonically designed to make the lights, and therefore the punters, go crazy in discos. Pete Waterman measured which frequencies tended to trigger the lights and tailored those records to make most use of those frequencies. Listen to any SAW single - there's no real low end on any of them. In fact, I seem to recall the latest Kylie or whoever being described in the press at the time as "the usual tinny SAW sound, and we're sure it'll go to number 1."
Waterman once said in an interview that his proudest achievement was discovering a particular drum fill which made the lights do a full sequence in the course of two bars - he used it on practically every record after that.
The music leaves me cold, but as an engineer I can't help admiring Pete Waterman for this feat.
How about this Prestie?
if this doesn't put a bit of water in your eye, your more hard-hearted than me:
[Jose Gonzalez - Hand on Your Heart]
*splutter!*
"I'd Rather Jack" is the closest thing I have to a personal anthem! I was genuinely taken aback when I heard it on the radio, particularly the direct references to other bands. Far more impact in 3 minutes than all of punk.
Status Quo
Often derided, but a career of genuine highlights and worth
True... here's 'Paper Plane'.
Another vote for Matt Monro
He had a great voice and produced some great singles that stand the test of time.
And also, how about Leo Sayer?
Yes! Moonlighting
is the greatest elopement song of 'em all. 'We're only ten miles to Gretna, they're three hundred behind', and all to a jaunty, Paul Simon kinda melody. And he used to live at Shoreham Beach, now known as Share 'em Beach on account of the swinging scene that way.
I really love this
Sugar Baby Love
One of the great "pastiche" records. Works far better without the visuals - this is a radio record. (Weren't they all session musicians, and a band had to be created to ride the single success?)
Anyway, when I hear:
People
Take my advice
If you love someone
Don't think twice
LOVE YOUR BABY LOVE
- I don't hear parody, I hear "pop sincerity", and I am ready to lay down my life.
I think my filter
was turned off at birth. I enjoyed Barry Manilow when I was a teenager, I thought Bros were great. Simply Red and especially Level 42 made brilliant pop records. Gilbert O'Sullivan and even my beloved DA seem to be blocked by manys correctness filters. Through my sons I have chosen to listen to Razorlight, Editors and Stereophonics. Keanes "Hopes and Fears" would register very high on my list of favourite albums. Kajagoogoos "Too Shy" came on my iPod tonight from an 80's electronica compilation and I had my air slap bass, full overbite turned up to 11. Great, great thread.
Have an up, Sir,
apart from the period in the eighties when I shut myself off to anything without a synthesiser on it, I have been open to almost anything. There is very little music I can't listen to and appreciate on some level.
The Real Thing
Unfortunately nowadays set in some kind of kitschy Butlins 70s nostalgia weekend bracket.
I think they should be seen as one of Britain's finest soul bands.
Uppitty up
Paddy
Get your lugs around this
Dave, 4 From 8 is a tremendous album.
And another up from me.
You could also add Heatwave, Hi Tension and Light of the World.
We had some great British soul in the 70's and early 80's with it's own unique sound.
An up for Heatwave
and in particular Rod Temperton who was more than a helping hand at the start of Michael Jackson's solo career.
There must have been something in the water in Grimsby
in the early 50s... Rod Temperton and Bernie Taupin.
Claims to fame
I love that song too (am I imagining it or did it debut on New Faces?). And I'm almost certain that Chris Amoo from the band is the only soul singer to have taken Best In Show at Crufts, for his Afghan hound Gable.
Boots No7 makeup sales soared...
Japan were cursed by early bad decisions
Even their ropey early discs feature some solid ideas, but their image and marketing always seemed out-of-sync. Here in Toronto, they were a radio staple on local FM station CFNY-FM in the late 70s and had (have?) a large and supportive audience ('Quiet Life' charted at around 80 on the lp charts in early 1980).
I love Japan
and David Sylvian. Every wave of pop has an outsider version and I remember Japan as the outsiders of the synth-pop/new romantic era.
As you say they always seemed out of step with what was acutely hip and popular but in walking that line they were able to produce something different to the more popular acts at the time who ostensibly were working with the same tools and influences as them.
When Ghosts came out it seemed to be validation that their working in the margins gave them the space to generate something genuinely different for the time. As a track it sits both within and without the pop music of the time. I suppose that by never being centre of attention they never felt pressured to maintain that level of popularity by producing music to other people's expectations; they never repeated themselves, their music across each album always had different textures and ideas to what had gone before. I also suspect that Sylvian wouldn't have gone on to be such a maverick either if Japan had enjoyed a greater level of success and popularity.
Sylvian already had his coat on by 'Tin Drum'
The ouster of the old guitarist ('no guitars needed' one minute, a new and actual Japanese guitarist the next) indicated that the group was becoming something else entirely. I remember the Sylvian interviews right after TD and he seemed already to be looking past Japan as a musical vehicle. I'm not certain even mega-sales would have kept him in the group.
Someone should probably mention Iron Maiden
When I started to listen to them when I was ten or eleven I thought they were the coolest ever. The music, Eddie, the noise they made.
Now I realise they are probably not so cool, to be honest. Still love the music though. It makes me happy, it moves me and it fills me with energy.
Phantom of the Opera
Great song.
Maiden had quite a few of them, when you look back.
Good pick
That´s a great song. An early stab at something more progressive. It´s better on Live After Death with Bruce singing than on their debut album Iron Maiden with Paul. Haven´t got anything against Paul, but that kind of song is better with Bruce.
Karen Carpenter
It's a dry, dusty afternoon. You roll the hire car into an obscure village off the main road, looking for a coffee, even a Fanta. You drive past a cafe that may or may not be open, find the first available parking space a few hundred yards further on, then walk back. The streets are empty apart from one disinterested cat. You've forgotten what time it is, then suddenly you hear a medieval bell toll three times with a gravity and timbre that stops you dead in your tracks.
That's Karen Carpenter's voice that is.
Give Michael Jackson a break..
so the wacko years and the innumerable nose jobs played havoc with his reputation, but that run of albums Off the Wall/Thriller/Bad still sound mostly) terrific, performance-wise and sonically.
Worthless? I suspect people like 50Cent and Kanye West are only in it for the money.
Off The Wall
is pure genius
I rate the records he made...
with The Jackson 5 over and above anything he did as a solo artist with the possible exception of Off the Wall.
I listened to Bad recently
and it's a lot better than I thought. Far better than Thriller and, I'd say, more consistent than Off The Wall. It works really well as a whole. Give it another go.
Agreed.
"Bad" contains at least five songs which any other artist with working ears would kill for. The only real stinker on it is "Speed Demon".
Re. Kanye - don't lump him in with 50 Cent. He's a bit bonkers, but he's a genuine talent. Like almost all hip-hop artists, he has NO idea how to make a coherent, consistent album, but he's the real deal. Fiddy is a hack - always has been, always will be.
In defence of "guilty pleasures"
Am I alone in appreciating the notion of "guilty pleasures"? The consensus here seems to always be that there are no such things are guilty pleasures, just music you like and music you don't, but that's just not what it's like in practice, is it? Music, pop music in particular, isn't just a floating sound with no relation to real life: it's all about the context and the fashion and the message.
Let's take a comparison:
Do you like picking your nose? Everyone does it sometimes, don't they? So why don't you do it in public all the time? Because some things are best left private. You inherently understand that it would be an affront to public social mores to go around picking your nose all the time. So you do when no-one's looking. You would feel guilty if someone caught you at it. Ta da! It's a "guilty pleasure".
Well, I quite like picking my nose. And I also quite like The Only Way Is Up by Yazz And The Plastic Population. But I wouldn't walk around in public with a Yazz And The Plastic Population tshirt, or with a ghetto blaster blaring out The Only Way Is Up. Because I understand that this would bewilder and confuse people and they would think I was a moron.
But: I would discuss the merits of The Only Way Is Up with like-minded friends who were attuned to the nuances of great pop composition. Or I would bring it up in a place like the Word blog.
So what's wrong with calling that a "guilty pleasure"?
Furthermore, I think it's a really handy shortcut of a term and you know exactly what someone means when they say it (which is why it works so well as a concept for a compilation or a club night). I bet the vast majority of people I asked would be able to instantly identify what I mean by picking out the "guilty pleasures" from these five songs with little or no further explanation:
- What's Goin On - Marvin Gaye
- The Cha Cha Slide - DJ Casper
- This Ole House - Shakin Stevens
- Rhapsody In Blue - Gershwin
- Two Little Boys - Rolf Harris
Of course there are guilty pleasures
I am with you on this Stephen.
Many pleasures are guilty
Seriously..this idea that we operate in a judgement-free zone here on this blog, or in our lives, is rubbish. Anyone here who did not 'contextualize', for sake of argument, a passion for Bros would be whipped mercilessly by the commentariat. Does anyone doubt there exists somewhere a pro-feminist male academic who does not also secretly (very secretly) enjoy the odd 'Carry On' film, with Sid leering openly at Barbara, knowing fully that his intellect is not in play? The gap between our 'selves' and our desires often results in contradictions that can only be resolved by positioning those desires outside of our daily lives, and that includes trivial matters of taste such as pop music.
Which is a long and tortuous way of saying, I think 'SOS' by Abba is brilliant but wouldn't dream of trying to defend it to someone waving John Coltrane in my face.
I bloody would.
Defend SOS to someone waving John Coltrane in my face, that is.
They're for different things. El Hombre and Pencilsqueezer have kindly sorted me out with some jazz on CD this week, and I'm giving it a good old try, having previously been a paid-up denier.
But even the most brothel-creeper-wearing, beret-sporting, Gitanes-dangling hepcat would surely at least have to admit that ABBA and "Kind Of Blue" are for different things, wouldn't he?
Jazz - especially post-trad jazz - is a cerebral thing, a challenge, a hill to be climbed, a view to be enjoyed. I hope I'll get to the place where I can enjoy the view; right now I'm wheezing through the foothills.
Pop isn't. Pop is a funfair. Pop is a peach, or a steak, or a kiss: here's the desire - boom! - here's the payoff. Pop is seeing The Princess Bride, or Die Hard, or Ghostbusters at the cinema and leaving with a massive grin on your face because you might not have had to make an effort but you've still been amply rewarded. And because those films - and "SOS", for that matter - are works of the most staggering artistry. They just wear it lightly is all. I genuinely feel bad for people who can't or won't see that.
Which isn't to say that shit is good, or that good is shit. It's just that good doesn't have to mean hard. Easy doesn't have to mean worthless. "SOS" is up there with the best of human achievement, and Coltrane would probably tell you that too if he were alive and had working ears and no prejudices.
I fucking love pop music.
Daddio.
I agree completely with the sentiment Bob
But I would take issue with one thing.
Producing something as perfect as 'SOS' is by no means 'easy'. It is as much a work of art - and as much a product of graft, intelligence and sheer bloody brilliance - as 'Kind of Blue' or any other 'difficult' music that's out there (not that Kind of Blue is difficult - that's a whole other argument).
Exquisite pop is as difficult to produce - if not more so - than exquisite Jazz, or Rock, or whatever. Precisely because it has hurdles of prejudice to overcome before it can be accepted as 'art', which other, more cerebral forms of music, don't have to overcome.
And, as an aside, this is why pleasure in good pop music should never be guilty. There is nothing to be guilty about in accepting, enjoying and appreciating something that combines artistic merit with the ability to bring smiles and joy to millions.
Understandable misconstruction...
...Paul: I can see how you would've thought I was saying *making* SOS was easy. My fault. I wasn't. I was saying *consuming* it is easy. No effort required.
Ah gotcha
In which case we are in complete agreement.
I hope I'm not Daddio
I totally agree with the sentiments in response to my post, and did not mean to suggest that Coltrane trumps Abba. I merely meant that arguing the point can be a senseless waste of breath - and I've fought many popcult wars. Roxy Music (me) vs. Floyd. 'Never mind the Bollocks' (me) vs. 'In through the Out Door'. B-52's debut (me) vs. 'The Wall' (Floyd again!..and I actually like the Floyd). Anything recorded after 1970 (me) vs CSNY's 'Deja Vu'....I completely concur that we all 'consume' music differently. But not everyone gets that, they believe it's a failure of intelligence to prefer 'SOS' to 'A Love Supreme', or even to have any knowledge of 'SOS' in the first place.
.
No, that was a general Daddio! I wasnt directing that post at you so much as at the (plenty of) folk around who would be very comfortable dismissing pop music as worthless. We even have a handful on here.
Fantastic post, Bob.
Have another up.
The only thing I would quibble with is your connection of 'SOS' to 'Ghostbusters' and the like. That would be a fair comparison for something like 'Sugar Baby Love' but SOS? Even at the time I recognised its fathomless Scandinavian melancholy. To me, it's that juxtaposition between autumnal verses and a euphoric chorus that makes it one of the truly great pop records.
.
.
DJ casper - Cha Cha slide
It sounds like The Okey Cokey meets Hip hop to my uneducated ears.
i still think
the "guilty pleasures" tag has it's roots in the old Rock Snob school of thinking..to me it's still like what you like....I think S.O.S sounds perfect following "So What" on a compilation tape...
Bad Manners
Written off as a gauche, novelty ska band (which they were and so what?) and always unfairly compared to Madness. The bands were quite different really. I loved their first four albums as a kid and most of their singles were great goodtime pop! Lip Up Fatty, Special Brew, Lorraine, Just A Feeling, Walking In The Sunshine to name just four originals.
I've just learnt Buster Bloodvessel played his final ever UK gig in January. Shame, they were a superb live act.
Saw 'em playing at Stonehenge Free Festival
Certainly can't imagine "a gauche, novelty ska band" doing that. You're right they were better than that.
Jeez
you people who care about being cool
Vermin's Hermits
Pretty grim much of the time. But No Milk Today is great pop, and My Sentimental Friend has a "that's it, the sixties are over" feel - good instant nostalgia.
No Milk Today
was one of the first singles I ever bought. Don't still own it (or any of the others), but still enjoy it when I hear it. Seems visual. I can imagine a promo video for it, but don't know if one was ever made.
Adam and the Ants
Too often hurled in with the teeny bob New Romantic detritus of the early 80's, however they were much much better than that.
Interesting both musically (some of Pirroni's guitar lines are still quite brilliant - esp around Kings of the Wild Frontier) and visually. Ant providing Michael Jackson's uniform for the following decade.
Adam & the Ants
Great example. Back in 81 he was all over the charts. At the time I despised Prince Charming, but in hindsight, only because to admit liking A&TA was to invite mockery.
I know better now, Prince Charming is a fabulous song. (good video as well).
Never any such quibbles from me
I remember buying both Stand and Deliver on 7" and Kings of the Wild Frontier at a German hypermarket when I was 11 (Ratio in Bielefeld, a it happens). Adam went through a period where everything just kind of 'clicked'. The visuals managed to chime exactly with the music and it all worked perfectly. Kings has some absolutely storming album tracks on it: Making History, Don't Be Square, Los Rancheros, Jolly Roger.
Goody Two Shoes is still one of my favourite songs ever, and makes me feel old when it mentions writing something on a pound note. We should be able, in our dotage, to remember that just because 13 year old girls liked it didn't mean it wasn't any good.
But Ant Rap was a bit shit.
In defence of Ant Rap...
Marco, Merrick, Terry-Lee, Gary Tibbs and yours truly...take the trite lyrics out and that is one memorable and pretty ground breaking groove when nothing similar was coming out of the UK.
Cherished childhood memory of making my Mum read the lyrics over the dinner table (printed on the reverse of the 7" picture sleeve - the front had like advent calendar windows you could pop open - they don't make 'em like that for MP3's kids) and watching her uncomfortably squirm when she got to the "sexy south" bit!
You're dead right about Kings. Killer in the Home is a very dark and bewitching tune.
"To admit liking A&TA was to invite mockery."
Ridicule is nothing to be scared of.
(Sorry.)
Radiohead
I have long considered Radiohead to be the worst band in the world ever. David Gates crashes into Van der Graaf Generator with some awful songs. That just about covers it.
So I took Paul's advice and removed the Correctness Filter and listened again to OK Computer.
It's not all that bad.
Fuck.
I have long felt the same about The Smiths
but in the interests of open-mindedness, I periodically give them a try again.
So far, my opinion has remained unchanged.
It's good to have something you don't like :-)
Cliff's
"Sunny Honey Girl" - can someone please link to the video on You Tube?
Now I don't know which came first but what much-feted classic of uber-cool suburban shades and black-leather avant garde rock does it share its chorus melody note-for-note with?
here you go
sounds nothing like Upside Down by the Jesus and Mary Chain though.
In my 6th Form
years, my mates and I would alienate legions of our comtemporaries by playing stuff like "Metal Machine Music" (admittedly briefly) or Fripp Eno albums on the Common Room record player.
"Horses" and "Marquee Moon" were among the more palatable selections as we would suck on our Embassy Regal striking self-congratultory poses,convinced we were superior in our musical orientation to anyone whose tastes included anything unapproved by CSM or Nick Kent in that week's NME.
Woe betide any of our male counterparts who brought in "Hotel California" or their Peter Frampton, Yes or Supertramp albums.
Scorn unabated would be cast their way should anyone suggest we remove Bowie's frightful "David Live" in favour of ELP for a lunchtime airing.
As it was a boys' Grammar School up to Form Five, an even greater and more withering contempt had we for anything brought to bear by the newest recruits to our seat of education, the girls.
While pleasant to behold and rather more fragrant than us spotty, sweaty oiks, these individuals listened, would you believe, to singles!
How we guffawed as they asked if they could play their Diana Ross or Bee Gees 45's! "If You Leave Me Now" by Chicago - please ladies, go and tune in to the Radio One Roadshow in your rest room, we have the new one by The Dictators to spin to here!
These days I'd far sooner listen to a scratchy vinyl KC and The Sunshine Band or Kool & The Gang compilation than any remastered reissue of "No Pussyfooting" or "Radio Ethiopia"
How do they say, the men don't know but the little girls understand?
I present the ultimate uncool act
The Seekers
but by crikey those songs have longevity
The Seekers
I think they probably have a certain cachet.
If you'd said The New Seekers on the other hand…
Additionally I reckon that in the Word pantheon of stinky names where The Beatles and U2 stand proud (sic) that The New Seekers are squeezing onto that pedestal.
Judith Durham is...
....Danny Kelly's favourite singer. He mists up every time he hears her.
I'll get me coat
I present for your consideration
Duran Duran
Pre Lady In Red Chris De Burgh
My choices
Petula Clark and The Carpenters.
Chevy Chase is (or at least was) brilliant
Fletch is one of my favourite movies.
Dr Rosenpenis, Dr Rosenrosen, Mr Sinlinden, Fletch F Fletch and Dorf "The Dorf" Dorfman make me laugh as I type.
I love your legs, Larry.
- Are you a cop?
- As far as you know.
For my sins...
For my sins, I love this (& every other version of Elizabethan Serenade I have ever heard)
Please disconnect all taste sensors before watching this clip.
http://youtu.be/Rthj1nqfzgI
Bobby Goldsboro
I have just posted this on the summer songs thread, but I think this thread is perhaps a more natural home.
I absolutely love this.