Entertainment For Lively Minds
Random lazy journalist cliches that annoy the middle aged me when grumpy....
Posted by BernkastelCues on 30 August 2011 - 10:28am.
When I read the phrase "taken the London art world/Broadway/Glynebourne/Edinburgh festival by storm"
No they didn't. Soldiers, besiegers and revolutionaries take things by storm, usually involving much blood, snotters, unpleasantness and desctruction.
People who draw/dance/sing/prentend to be someone else do those things quite well sometimes, but it's not in the same league. It's all quite poncy and inconsequential actually, and attempting to make it seem otherwise by using dramatic and powerful language just makes you look like a twat. So stop doing it.
There, got that off me chest then.
- More from BernkastelCues.
- Login or register to post comments










I hope you have Spotify
The comedian Louis CK talks about this: "When did we start taking our words from the top shelf?"
http://open.spotify.com/track/5xQmQDCbyZCwXttJtrNj4j
There's some effin' an jeffin' and all that. It's NSFW, some might be offended, viewers of a weaker disposition etc, etc.
Thank you for that.
One of the reasons I like this blog is you get pointed to stuff like this.
Make no apologies for swearing either, it's an integral part of British culture and I'll brooke no attempts to gentrify it.
Feck em all. Bowdlerising b'stards.
don't you mean
Fuck em all. Bowdlerising bastards?
Being polite James
The "management" doesny like it when we swear.
Taken by storm
I don't think it's lazy. It's just a military term that's found common use as a metaphor in other idioms - sports, music, fashion, etc. No-one would claim it's being used in it's original, literal sense. If anything, these other uses have become the norm in English - and you certainly won't find the military version of the term used much in 2011, if at all, even in an era where Tripoli might be said to have been "taken by storm". Language moves on.
Don't disagree with your point..
that language moves on, Dad. However,the expectation that the language should eventually just catch up with hacks' misuse, just because it is frequent, is anathema to me. Decimate has already gone, see below, and presently and literally are tottering on the brink. The specific meanings of these words are quite simply being sacrificed for..
..what exactly?
Easy, Dec.
You don't need a license to abuse words, you just need to be lazy.
No , I'm not having this linguistic relativism
It's poncy and innapropriate for the activity it describes.
It's ascribing heroism and the projection of will to fecking dance and charcoal drawing.
Sorry. But we'll have to disagree on this.
It's like Wimbledon
A fancied player never simply "loses" to a lesser opponent in an early round.
They are always "bundled out".
When someone dies, tributes never "arrive", they always come "flooding in".
There must be a name for this kind of hyperbole.
Other than hyperbole, that is.
does the Hyperbole
come before or after the Superbowl... bole.... Super..
sorry
How about "taken out"...
This egregious euphemism for the assassination of Osama.
"Taken out"? Really? Was it a treat, or did they split the bill?
Our bins are done on a Tuesday.
I've just had to take them back in again.
Surprised you havent had
a deluge of replies on this. Surely your controversial opinions must have caused a level of disagreement of seismic proportions.
I detect the sneer of sarcasm..
Not sure why? Maybe its just your default setting?
It's really not that attractive.
Don't give me that,
you snotty-faced heap of parrot droppings!
The full half hour?
Now go away or I will taunt you a second time, so called Arthur King and your silly keeerrr-niggits!
And no swear words.
I'm impressed. (a bit...)
Wasn't sarcasm
just having a little bit of fun by replying to your post with phrases that apparently get your goat.
I thought the post was negative but rather than ignoring it thought I would try and turn it into something more humourous. There is enough shite going on in the world without listening to people moan about things that really aren't important.
Lighten up mate - it ain't the crime of the century. Oops sorry wrong post.
My goat is ungotten by those phrases.
Not bovvered by this generally, just the "take tearoom by storm" nonsense.
What have I started?
You could argue
that using the phrase 'taking by storm' is a bit lazy but to imply that it is somehow disrespectful to soldiers etc is a bit daft.
How about "glassed the face of the London art world/Broadway, Glynebourne, Edinburgh Festival, AA Gill with a dirty tankard?'
I don't think I said It was disrespectful to soldiers
Just that it was an arsey thing to say in the context of "arts". Rather like "I bludgeoned and slashed my way towards the the finish of my cake decoration.
Neither did I
I said you 'implied' it.
There are quite literally, thousands of phrases like this in journalism. It's just an expression.
If a show 'blows you away' it is not suggested there might be a giant wind machine involved in the production. Likewise, if a comedian 'bombs' at the Chuckle club, he won't be tried for war crimes.
The Beatles ARE bigger than Jesus though.
That's true
and here's conclusive proof
Cool!
A "Buddy Christ"!
This is most strange...
George, John and Ringo seem to have been done some serious "benchwork" judging from their muscular development, but Paul looks normal. I demand an explanation.
'is 'ands
are a bit well, yer know like...
Well, there are four of them for a start
Your right, it's just an expression. But a fecking annoying one to me.
'Everyones talking about..'
as used by the idiot India Knight and sundry other Polly Fillers about whatever bit of inconsequential nonsense has momentarily flittered across a few restaurant tables in Fulham. 'The whole countries talking about Stella MacCartney's new Fish-skin winter boot collection' 'The question of qualifications for Polo instructors is currently obsessing the nation'. etc, etc. .
India Knight....
...once tweeted me objecting to an opinion I volunteered. I'd never heard of her and said so. Didn't hear from her again.
This year's 'must have'
All of which I have survived very happily without.
New players
Football club's new signings are always 'unveiled'. No they're not. Sky Sports do not cut to a shrouded figure on a plinth in front of the sponsors' wall with the smug manager's hand on the cord ready to trill "ta-da!!". They should. But they don't.
And players who want a transfer.....
....are always 'want-away'.
'Local bragging rights' (a phrase never ever used or even heard of five years ago) is the one that irks me.
Often doesn't make any sense.
If, for example, a Man. City fan wound up a Man. Utd. fan after a 1-0 win, I still think the Man. Utd. fan would have a considerable 'local bragging rights' advantage over him or her!
It's called winning 40 trophies in 35 years or whatever the statistic is.
Ah but would they be in the same pub?
Surely the Man City fan would be in a Manchester pub whereas the Man U fan would be somewhere else between here and Singapore.
That's the one - "Bragging Rights"
has always annoyed the bejaysus out of me. Firstly, it sounds clumsy, and seconds, it's decidedly unsportsmanlike, isn't it?
Want-away players
They are all "penning" contracts now as the window is about to shut.???..??
What I hate is..
'Just sayin'...'' and 'Is it me?'* and the most hateful of all, 'Are you thinking what's she's thinking'? that accompanies Jan Moir's columns in The Daily Mail.
*As does Andrew Harrisson in his amusing piece in Word a few issues back.
Simple mispunctation
It should read: "Jan Moir. Are you thinking, 'What? She's... THINKING?!'"
"WE..."
as in '10 things WE love about the great British fry-up' or 'Why WE're all twats for Twitter' or whatever. Popularised by Heat in the late 90s and adopted by everyone from The Times to Saga Magazine to the Argos catalogue to The Word.
Fuck. Off. YOU don't speak for ME.
Decimated
which means to remove 10%, when used for something much worse.
"The population of the village below the volcano was decimated" - accompanied by pictures of lava passing through said village at roof top height.
"That's bad", I think to myself, "but I'm amazed they got off so lightly...".
This was the one I was thinking of and always flinch at....
but, to be honest, just like the example set by the OP, the original use has moved on. Language continues to evolve, grow and develop. Saying 'decimate' when they don't mean precisely one in ten doesn't strike me as particularly trite, or lazy: it just reflects current usage.
For me, it's like getting arsey about split infinitives: surely there are better things to get het up about?
(And there I go again. Het? Is that even a real word?)
It is - the definite article in Dutch
Het = The
meh
I just thought the Dutch didn't use spellcheck, and were particularly bad typists. I stand corrected.
It's an old form of the past tense
of heat, as in heated, I think. So 'het up' simply means heated up.
And of course there is
X is like Y .... on Acid!
Sketch says it all
Quality exception:
I remember David Cavanagh once describing some Fellini movie as "like LSD on acid".
Algebra is like acid?
I always found it more like Mogadon.
'Wrong on soooo many different levels"
'Ok, define at least eight of these different levels then'. --- writer, Dan Maier
These days
crime is rife in multi storey car parks
That's wrong on so many levels.
(c) Tim Vine
Credit your sources, fella. Credit your sources. ;-)
Also Canadian Stand-Up Stuart Francis's version
'I farted in a full lift'
'That's just wrong on so many levels'
I've said it before and I'll say it again
I can't bear what I call the pseudonym-reveal. The Guardian in particular can't bear to not tell you someone's real name in the opening sentences.
Just to take a few random reviews from their webpage:
"Stephen Bruner loves the intergalactic cartoon felines Thundercats so much, he took their name as his own."
"Texas trio Ringo Deathstarr aren't just fans of British shoegaze royalty such as the Jesus and Mary Chain and My Bloody Valentine, they've basically created a "How To" guide in their debut album, Colour Trip. Guitars are drenched in reverb and effects, the duel vocals of Elliott Frazier and Alex Gehring coalesce into an unintelligible mass throughout, "
"Stockholm's Maria Lindén and Fredrik Balck make heady, sumptuously textured soundscapes that pulse with feeling." (I Break Horses Hearts)
"It's hard to believe that Yuck, a London band fronted by 20-year-old Daniel Blumberg (formerly of the effervescent Cajun Dance Party, who burned brightly but faded away after one album in 2008) are so young."
It's like there's no point in having a band name anyway as they'll just pick up on the singer's full name and run with it. We'd be living in a more Zimmerman world these days if the Grauniad had it's way. Romance? Mystery? They hates it they do!
Boffins
Boffins like Barnes Wallis helped shorten the war, but then they died out until tabloids rediscovered the word.
Now any scientist or engineer with a new invention is a boffin. Indeed anyone with any sort of science degree is a boffin. It probably extends down to anyone passing GCSE science courses.
drummer for
Mott the Hoople
Or perhaps ...
... anybody (not just a rock star) breaking wind.
Buildings being "Razed to the Ground"
how the fuck else would you raze a building? Not just a cliche but bad usage too.
Grr
Sky Sports News have promised to
"keep me across" all the transfer deadline dealings...where the effing hell did THAT come from???
That's because
they're 'All over it'
'robust'
How many times have you heard that word on the news in the past month? Why has this rather old fashioned adjective suddenly become popular?
nup
I used to use it all the time when describing the music I listened to (Anthrax/Megadeth/Ministry/RevCo) to my peers at work, damn fine word!
I used "robust"
in my recent thread about King's X.
I didn't realise it was old-fashioned.
A warning
its a short step from here to being Rufus Hound on Channel 4 complaining about the ineffectiveness of staplers.
Let it go....
Yes.
Except were not on TV getting paid for our observations
And shame on you for watching 100 Greatest Gits in the first place.
I only saw that bit
and I thought it was the nadir of TV. I'm sure someone was about to gaffaw
"Still using PAPER and wanting it TOGETHER. But HEY, not too MUCH Paper, I can't cope! I mean, what's THAT all ABOUT?
You will become this
What? Become a reactionary Daily Mail reading twat?
Bit harsh, for people merely posting a few innocuous observations on a messageboard (when they should be getting on with something important).
'A raft...'
of policies
of compromises
of ideas
of proposals
...of nonsense!
a slew...
of just about anything
Much beloved
by American music mags on the denim and studs side of rock is the unlovely expression "balls to the wall", or sometimes, simply, "balls out".
I think I know what they mean, but they come (oo-er) with distinctly unpleasant connotations all the same.
aaaaargh
Please, not 'beloved'. Famous people can no longer just support their local team, it has to be their beloved Burnley/Darlington/Witton Albion/whatever.
It hardly needs mentioning that this is worse still if said famous people are National Treasures.
aaaargh again
It rankles with me too.
I noticed it last night when watching on BBC2, The Woman Who Swims With Killer Whales which spoke of her beloved Orca.
A very good documentary by the way, about a somewhat crazy, but brave, scientist.
Dearly beloved
we are gathered here today to remember this band:
'Beloved', of course.
Bloke last saw an Everton (other northern teams are available) home game ten years ago.
Bloke becomes a celebrity and flees to Richmond/Greenwich/Hampstead (could be called Gallagher or Ashcroft) at the earliest possible opportunity.
Alan Brazil/Richard Keys/Andy Gray interviews said celebrity about 'their beloved Everton'.
Newspaper headlines
that start with the word 'Now' as in 'Now they want to tax our children'
Like we were midway through a conversation.
I hate newspapers.
I think the OP is fair enough comment
There are phrases which the journalist has just lifted off a shelf, or because they assume (rightly?) that their readers won't "get it" if they try to use more original language. This doesn't piss me off, it's just patronising when people whose job is to write stuff for your benefit, can't seem to do it without resorting to oodles of cliches.
Some more examples;
- no-one gets made redundant, they're always "axed"
- disagreements are always "fury"
- an accident is always a "horror"
- MPs are always referred to in military/violent terms ("the Praetorian Guard of Tory HQ", "X has been un-muzzled and set loose on the LibDems", "mopping up the opposition" etc etc) - it just sounds like w*nk-fantasy for the journalist and the MP alike, which is why they continue to do it
- someone who has had a bad experience talks about their "agony".
As CJ once said, "a cliche to me is like a red rag to a bull".
The Right CJ
I didn't get where I am today by using cliches.
As a writer/journalist
of no great consequence, two of the phrases which unfailingly piss me off are "lazy journalism" and "badly written."
On most occasions they are trotted out (there's another one!) it's by people who have no concept of working in an under-pressure newspaper or magazine office environment attempting to make deadlines, write to length, come up with a story in the first place, with subs, news editors, sports editors, features eds, editors screaming at you to hurry up with your copy.
Not all writers are fortunate enough to be jetted out to LA and put up in luxury to interview Tom Waits or someone in some swanky suite and have days to file their copy.
For most of us it's not about coming up with exquisitely-sculpted, never-before-used phrases or metaphors/similes but like most other people it's about doing what needs to be done as well as it needs to get done to keep getting paid.
While I'd love to be ground-breaking and original at all times what I care most about is getting sufficient freelance work done to feed my family, if it's not "Ulysses" or early Bob Dylan, so be it.
Winners will continue to be "rammed home," batsmen "bowled neck and crop" and, no doubt, "sonic cathedrals of sound" erected until the day I am told I have endless time on my hands to fanny about coming up with Gerard Manley Hopkins style neologisms or comparisons as yet undrawn by any other writer or hack in the history of the printed word.
"Lazy Journalism" often means "the writer has a different view than I have" and in 20-odd years I have never had a sub or an editor or anyone knock anything back to me on account of it being "badly written" although plenty of people on comment threads or football/music/cricket forums have labelled my stuff so!
That made me think a bit,
That made me think a bit, Preston, and I think you've clarified something I occasionally feel about my own writing. The struggle to avoid cliche can communicate itself to the style, so that it becomes a pain to read. It gets effortful.
It's one of the things I like about country music, or Dylan's early '70s stuff. It's content to let some feelings be expressed the way they've always been expressed, because that's what they feel like. But the writer's vanity can get in the way of it. It tries to make every phrase sing, which is like a band using every instrument they have on every song. Sometimes a cliche is the truest phrase, and it takes a bit of courage to use it - deadline or not.
Rolled-Out. Ring-Fenced.
And any of a billion other examples of management wank-speak. Grrr.
On the other hand, they also gave rise to Wank Words Bingo, which at least makes having to listen to this unutterable nonsense bearable.
What's
Wank word bingo?
same as Bullshit Bingo
sit in a management meeting - first person to cross off all the words on this list wins
Synergy / Strategic Fit / Gap Analysis / Best Practice / Bandwidth / In the Loop / Benchmark / Value-Added / Proactive / Win-Win / Think Outside The Box / Fast Track / Knowledge Base / Mindset / Client Focused / Leverage
Stakeholder/
Blue Sky Thinking/Heads Up/