Entertainment For Lively Minds
Question Time.
Posted by Pinmonkey on 16 September 2010 - 10:55am.
Going back to the banking crisis we have been told that the cash points in the UK were within hours of not working. If this had happened how long would it have taken before total anarchy ensued?
I don't think we are out of the woods economically by a long way and the current round of spending cuts will impose extreme economic hardship on society. With union leaders calling for "civil disobedience" what would it take for people to take to the streets and do the Massive think this could happen in our "civilised society"?
- More from Pinmonkey.
- Login or register to post comments










Any excuse for a flashmob
The Facebook crowd would be all over it, stirring it up. That's what people do now. It sends a shiver down my spine.
Facebook is the biggest social networking site
That counts for something. Get used to it and get over it.
Ooooh-oooooh!
Glad to see you've not been boiling with resentment over the past few days then.
Not really
But I was annoyed that you attacked me in such an aggressive, unprovoked manner then proceed to ignore my response.
Strikes me as bad manners.
It wasn't an attack
just my opinion.
Don't be over-sensitive.
Fair enough
Apologies to Pinkmonkey for this digression.
I think
we've got our answer as to how quickly "civil disobedience" can erupt.
;)
More considered, non smart-arse opinion will appear below.
I'm not so sure
I'm not sure we'll see huge, disruptive strikes of the likes we've seen before.
The miners, the transport workers, the printers...etc were all unionised and organised. Workers seem a little more disparate now
However,
as Alan Davies's 80s programme reminded us tonight, whilst the biggest industrial conflict was ultimately lost by the miners, a subsequent campaign of civil disobedience and protest (against the Poll Tax) was rather more successful - so there does remain some hope that the force of mass rejection can have a significant impact on changing policy.
I read
a stat somewhere that 25% of the UK's workforce is in a Union, that seems plenty to me to cause problems if they get their act together.
Are their potential strike actions justifiable? Damn straight they are. You're going to lose your public sector job and you still don't understand why your money was used to prop up banks who now seem to be sitting on their hands when it comes to making money available in the wider economy. Public sector employment has been the biggest employment growth area in the UK in recent years, more than the private sector. Here's the simple line of action:
1. Banks have been bailed and many are part-owned by us
2. Deep public sector cuts are to be made
3. Private sector SMEs can't get credit for love or money and yet SMEs employ over 50% of the working private sector. Credit is an integral part of business growth.
Someone really needs to start explaining to me how the actions proposed by the Government that are on the table stimulate a return to a growth economy. I want to see it, I want to believe it but I can't.
Will I be cheering them on if they strike? Nope, because it will be a nightmare if they commit numbers across all sectors to a strike. My business will suffer undoubtedly some way or other. But I won't be blaming strikers for the actions they take, they're just banging their heads more noticeably against the brick wall of corporatism and croneyism. Having said that the likes of Bob Crowe can f**k off as far as I'm concerned, odious little man that he is. He's as much a fat cat as all of them in the City.
And relax.
How important are they?
Surely most people can survive for quite a while before they actually need cash. I reckon that, once I'd raided the piggy bank, I could last a good month before I have to go to a cash machine.
Jesus on a Tamworth!
My piggy bank is so light it just blew away in the breeze...
Bob Crow
'Odious' doesn't quite do him justice. A nasty thug, basically, setting trade unionism back thirty years. Loathe though I am to reference the Daily M**l for anything, here are Bob's true colours shining through...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1279035/RMT-union-boss-Bob-Crow-...
Mind you
if my union subs were being used to sponsor a football team and getting the full time officials decent seats (and probably lunch), I'd be pretty cross and go out on strike as well.
"if they get their act together"
...I think that's the killer question. I've had to try and avail myself of union support (NIPSA) for a couple of work issues ongoing since August 2009. I found my initial (volunteer) rep very supportive but inexperienced to handle the level of HR games-playing being used; the higher-level official (employed by the union) I was soon passed on to could talk the talk in the pointless meeting but was the worst person I've ever had to deal with in terms of communications and organisation. You'd have more chance getting a phone call returned by Lord Lucan.
A month ago, issues dragging on with literally nothing progressing, I had enough. I reported him to another union official who seemed sympathetic, asked her in person and in writing to take on the case and for God's sake run with it, do SOMETHING, while I took my doctor's advice and stepped back from it.
Things were grand for a couple of weeks until I phoned to check and it became clear that NOTHING was being done. And still no word from Lord Lucan. I doorstepped the union's top guy in his HQ a couple of weeks back. He assured me he'd deal with it, have a word with Mr Elusive. A week later, still no contact. I sent Top Guy an email saying I'm resigning from NIPSA and going to Unison: if this was the kind of guy he was happy to work with, good luck to him - but I'd put up with the crap for months on end and if it had been any other situation (like hiring a plumber) I'd have simply gone elsewhere after the second unreturned phone call.
I haven't yet signed up to Unison (I need to be sure they can and will move on an existing case first), but at least the official I'm dealing with is returning phone calls. It's a start.
But my general feeling? These people - unions - couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery let alone a campaign of civil disobedience. Scargill was a self-aggrandising moron who could somehow mobilise the masses with hand-written placards; today's union bosses are either backroom politicians with glossy brochures or throwback idiots like Bob Crow. No matter how crap Britain becomes I don't believe anyone - short of a situation where cash-machines don't work - has the appetite for serious strikes/disobedience. we're all too jaded: we know it doesn't work, it just causes pain in the long run and the country's buggered no matter what.
Unions should stick to doing their best for members in workplace disputes and stop involving themselves in politics on a national level.
My wife
is a union member and has voiced similar disgruntlement about her reps. She works for a Trust and is a Team Leader, a role that bridges management and the people at the coal-face. Or the cynic in me says it's the role that gets her paid less than managers but has her doing more.
Anyway, her department is facing cuts and she has worked with her managers over the past few weeks to look at savings that won't lead to job cuts. They couldn't quite make it and one person, effectively a trainee, has been told their job will not be made permanent. All very upsetting but I believe her when she said that they couldn't make the savings needed without that post going.
What happens? The reps decide that a fuss needs to be made to save this person's job, that the cut is unnecessary, that action needs to be taken against "management" etc. etc. My wife tells me that this rep. has never been involved in any of the discussions about the savings exercise despite being cc'd on all reports and invited to all meetings. Only once the decision was taken did the rep. decide to become active.
If that isn't the definition of - to use your term Colin H - a self-aggrandising moron I don't know what is. Purely an act of political manoeuvering rather than of being a representative of the personnel in my wife's department.
Don't Get Me Started.
See previous blog entries for background: but, I was, and am, so concerned at what was happening in my part of the NHS that I contacted my Union Rep and asked to be put forward as Shop Steward for our bit of it.
Result: absolutely sod all.
Conclusion: They can go fuck themselves.
Two quick points:
1) The, "Putting public sector workers on the dole will cost you money as you have to pay their dole money" argument. Err, isn't the point that as public sector workers I'm already paying for them? So if they can't do a job that demonstrates some kind of real public value (i.e. a policeman, fireman, binman etc as opposed to the Racial Minorities Equality Monitor or someone doing a mundane admin job that could be computerised) then frankly it's a no-brainer.
2) The, "Banks have a duty to lend money" argument. No they don't. They're profit-making businesses that got us into this mess largely because they lent / invested / funded too much without bothering to make sure those decisions were without undue risk. Why repeat the same mistake?
I think the "bash the bankers" approach is as dumb as the "all benefit claimants are layabouts" approach. It's too big a problem for generalisations and requires far more thought than simplistic slogan wielding idealogues would have us believe.
Amen to that (both points)
And I would add to the oft-used "WE OWN the banks" mantra. Indeed we do and they are worth something, a fuck of a lot. We (UK plc) will make a tidy sum when we sell our share of Lloyds Banking Group and Northern Rock and RBS. Joe Public Sector won't complain about bankers then, especially if they do a BT share issue thing and everyone's hard-earned pay make them few quid for basically nothing.
The tax take from the City is an absolutely VITAL component to the nation's economy. I hope banks make billions and billions and billions of profit and stay in this country, we will all be better off whatever we do and wherever we live.
That depends what happens
to the cash that's raised from those sales. If it's just used to clear up the mess he bankers left behind, and not used to try and help out the wider economy, then I think the outlook could be grim. nd remember, because the banks were over-inflating their worth and things have sunk back, we as tax payers won't be recovering much of the money needed for the bail out.
I actually think that things may hinge on how bad the winter is. A season of public sector slash n burn, together with job losses and a bad winter could create something of a perfect storm. By next May, if things roll along that long, the results of the AV referendum could tip the coalition one way or the other. Clegg is trying to say he'll hold the line and keep the coalition going, but if all those who say they'll campaign against carry the day, a lot of LibDems will take a long hard look at whether they need to hold the coalition together, and worse for Clegg, whether his own position is tenable. I'm thinking the next 9 months or so is going to be fairly bumpy.
Yes, I think we all know...
...that cuts - serious cuts - need to be made for the good of the country, Bisto. I think a lot of people are happy to nod in agreement but express outrage when it looks like its coming too close to them/their friends/their departments. I'm sure your wife would much rather the trainee could be kept on, but sometimes the best will in the world can't deliver sentiment from stricture.
Truth is, aside from the current impasse with HR scumbags, I know my own job - public sector - could easily be cut, or at least made part-time. I couldn't honestly mount much of a defence in the current climate - I WANT the public sector to reduce in size and for waste to be curtailed (after decades of monstrous carnage on the public purse), and I accept that my job could well be seen as non essential. Yes, there would be certain longer-term consequences for my workplace but nothing of any immediate significance and nothing of any great importance even in the long term. Museums still exist withour curators; they just change into increasingly mothballed rooms of old stuff. Such is life.
Apparently my wife's job (management, different public sector place) and indeed her whole department is under threat. The consequences for cutting all of her department would have much greater middle-to-long term consequences for that organisation (a health trust) and for getting best use out of public money, but these seem to be desperate times. People wielding axes may well go for what seem short term solutions.
And leaving unions aside, an even GREATER shower of unschooled, in-fighting, posturing, public-purse-powered, self-aggrandising soap-box merchants is the Northern Ireland Assembly. These are the clowns who actually have that axe in this part of the world.
Bob Crow is a clown parading around his circus ring till the public get bored and boo him off the front pages; the NI axe-weilders, alas, are the people who've somehow inherited the circus - a load of half-baked strong-men acts, bearded ladies and loonies with uncaged lions - and they've set up their tent in everyone's front garden and there's bugger all we can do about it.
Could be a frugal Christmas round here...
This thread
This thread has thrown up so much informed comment. I dont think my situation will add to it.
I work in the private sector, & my contract has less than 2 years to run, when it is up, I will be 56, not an attractive catch. I have worked in a power station for a long time, I dont know anything else, & I am shit scared for the future.
It isnt just the public sector feeling the heat.
My advice
would be: it's easier to find a job when you have a job. Don't wait 2 years, look now. Also, ask to speak to your boss. Can you get an extension, can you negotiate a new deal now?
How transferable are your skills? You work in the enery sector, can you look for work in renewables, nuclear etc?
Cheers bisto
cheers, I am trying to look for another position, but found out just yesterday, that the position I interviewed for last week went to the other candidate.
I am feeling a bit sorry for myself, thats all.
Understood
That's a kick in the teeth. But at least you're doing something and feeling sorry for a reason that is based upon you doing something! It would be a different story if you were feeling sorry for yourself for not creating opportunities for yourself. Nothing worse than feeling you've missed out by not trying.
As Arnold Palmer the golfer said:
That sentiment is true in my experience no matter how good or bad the times are.
One other thing
and apologies if you have already done this. Find out the good recruitment agencies in the profession and sign up to them. Also, do the employers your looking to work for use a recruitment company (as opposed to an agency). If so, send them you CV as well as they will always look to recruit from their own collection of CV's rather than go out to another agency.
Good luck.
The total breakdown of civilised society
is only days away. Look at recent events such as the Christchurch earthquake (curfew to stop looting) and Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans (mob rule, law and order gone) and you see a snapshot of what would happen if the money stopped flowing.
Most people don't have piggy banks or mattresses stuffed with cash. If cashpoints stop working, credit cards, shops etc all grind to a halt. It will only take the first idiot to smash a window and walk home with a nice TV for disobedience to spread like wildfire.
I've long held the view that our so called civilisation is little more than a brittle veneer and that underneath tribal savagery lies, awaiting its opportunity to drag us all down.
Cheerful eh?
Tribal Savagery there....
...three more from them later.
I actually physically
laughed out loud. I don't think I shall ever tire of that one popping up.
Oh, and....
;-)
Are we that close?
In both instances you cite, there was a pretty huge destruction of infrastructure and I think that survival of the fittest instincts will take over quite soon in these circumstances. That's not really what we're talking about here is it? I know people don't have money stuffed in mattresses but surely the vast majority of people have enough cash to get them through a week or so of essential purchases where using credit or debit cards isn't an option - and there really aren't that many of them around these days are there? There can't be many people these days that rely on getting their cash from ATMs that don't have debit cards. Yes, it will be different but I would have thought that the relatively recent occasions where it looked like people weren't going to be able to get fuel to get to work was likely to cause bigger problems and even they take some time to kick in.
I have a nasty feeling that your overall view on civilisation is all too accurate though.
Christchurch
The curfew was there to stop people roaming around at night during aftershocks and then putting themselves at risk around some very big and very wobbly buildings. There were reports of looting, but it was certainly not widespread at all.
I thinks it's time to mention...
...the underdiscussed fact that Phil Collins has released an album of Motown covers. Let's bring this fight to the streets!
You reckless bastard.
Are you trying to cause looting?
Although in this case, it'll be reverse looting: thousands of people smashing the windows of HMV in a scramble to replace Phil's meisterwerk on the shelves.
Oh that was Phil Collins
I thought it was Bob Crowe on Later with Jools last night as he was so out of tune. And didn't sound much like 'The Internationale' to me either
Doc, are you saying you can feel it...
...coming in the air tonight?
Oh Lord!
Where can I join this angry mob?
We could call ourselves 'Landfill for Phil'.
Or...
...just Philistines...?
Either way, we've clearly all Had Our Phil. There's the first placard slogan already...
Floodgates open, over to you, etc...
As Phil
has done so badly with his Motown Mauling he is presumably now a Rum Collins
As usual the answer is
Die Hard 4.
Emergency!
I once read that any civilised society is supposed to be just three days from anarchy. I forget whether that means three days without food, or three without electricity, or water, but you get the drift.
If things are looking bleak (Phil's Motown album could definitely be one of the harbingers of the end times), you might do worse than read Emergency by Neil Strauss. It's a real eye-opener full of tips of what to do in preparation for the final days (e.g., become a volunteer fireman because you'll get a badge, light and hi-vis jacket that will enable you to get through the inevitable traffic chaos). You might want to skip the bit when he learns to gut an animal he's killed, mind...
An expat living in Canada, I'm a bit removed from what's happening in the UK, but it sounds pretty tense and I wish everybody luck with their situations. For those at risk of losing their jobs, fingers crossed for you.
I thought it was three...
...hot meals from Anarchy. Three somethings, anyway.
My advice
is to fill your garage with jerry cans of diesel, stock up on Calor gas, logs and candles, withdraw ALL your cash now and do a MASSIVE run to Sainsburys, make sure the shotgun is in good working order, and buy an extra thousand shells just in case.
One more thing
Check your car runs on diesel!
My hope for the End of Days
is that its not as crap as the film
Detroit
Frankly, I'm always amazed there isn't more social disorder than there is.
I do fear what will happen to many of the UK's towns and cities in the next few years.
We could see their near extinction and desertion. Can't imagine a deserted Liverpool, Newcastle, Bradford?
Witness what's happened to Detroit. That's Detroit, Motor City USA. The American Capitalist Dream personified
Wild animals roam and savannah grass grows around skyscrapers. Trees grow from the windows of the monolithic former headquarters of major organisations.
America's a big place. People can always find somewhere to go. The UK isn't. Where will they go? London?
How many can that city hold before they close the gates?
See Below: Julien Temple's extraordinary Requiem For Detroit
False impression
I wonder if this could actually happen in Britain, as you say, the US is a big place and traditionally people have been very mobile, in the case of Detroit, they have just left all at once. However, I've been there since the documentary was shot and although I was surprised to see tractors on the streets (the documentary hadn't been shown at that stage), I didn't get the impression of a deserted city. There were a lot of abandoned buildings but you get those wherever you go in the US but in the areas around the Ford headquarters it seemed like a relatively affluent city. I'm not saying that anything on the film was false and I know that a lot of jobs have been lost and a lot of people have left but it is has not been abandoned in the way the film gave the impression that it has.