Entertainment For Lively Minds
Queen - Now there was a "Marmite" band
Posted by Uncle Wheaty on 20 November 2009 - 9:14pm.
I've just seen the Queen medley on Children in Need
Do you love or hate them?
I have to admit I fall in both camps - I loved everything up until the Flash soundtrack and after that I really couldn't stand them.
Live Killers is a great live album and their 1970s output is wonderful classic rock. The 1980s smug persona left me cold, yet live they were still marvellous.
- More from Uncle Wheaty.
- Login or register to post comments










If 'Queen's Greatest Hits' had 'Under Pressure' on it...
it would be a flawless compilation. They did the odd good tune after that but really that best of is all I need. I think there should be a term to describe their albums: 'Mostly filler, some killer'.
Before I discovered the power of discernment I loved everything they did up until 'The Works'. I even rated 'Hot Space'. Blimey...
I am convinced I have seen such a thing
but have never really got to the bottom if it is fact, or just an aberration on my part.
Some investigation reveals that there exists a Japanese import version that includes Under Pressure, so maybe I wasn't making it up.
They were the first band...
...I got into as a wee lad. Cash being scarce in those days, I had to save to buy a cassette, which I would then play to death. I can still remember the order I got them in - The Works first, then Queen II, Queen I, Night at the Opera, Day at the Races, The Game, Sheer Heart Attack, Flash
, then Hot Space. The latter was a huge WTF? moment, and by this point, I was saving up for David Bowie albums - the rather less than stellar "David Live" being my first choice, though luckily, I persevered (it had more songs on it for the same money)I haven't played a Queen album in years, though I'm sure I'd still enjoy Queen II (a huge influence on Kurt Cobain, apparently)
Favourites at the time were The Prophet Song, Great King Rat and March of the Black Queen. I was also fascinated by Brian May's guitar orchestrations (surely he's got one of the finest arranging abilities in rock?)
Oh, and Freddie was probably the greatest frontman ever.
As a lad in the mid-80s they were regarded by me as 'the enemy'
and represented everything that was wrong with the embarrassing 70s survivors still hanging around in the pop charts. I loathed them.
I'm still not keen. But "Don't Stop Me Now" is brilliant.
'Don't Stop Me Now'...
best record they ever made.
Gives me an excuse to post this...
I literally love
that video!
Thanks.
Second ot third time I've seen this
still fantastically funny.
As is the opinion of just about everyone I've told about it, or sent the link to.
Same here
Hated them - there was too much going on. I have mellowed a little and Don't Stop Me Now is fabulous and I have a soft spot for One Vision (because I am convinced they sing "Fried Chicken" at the end and the riff is splendid).
Feel free to be convinced!
They do indeed sing 'fried chicken' at the end. From Wikipedia:
The final line of the song (in both the studio and live versions) is "fried chicken", although the lyrics say "one vision". This was a result of a prank that Freddie Mercury played in the studio, as the band had fried chicken for dinner that day. Jim Hutton, Freddie Mercury's lover, says in his book, that the singer was not sure, whether to include it in the final cut or not. Hutton encouraged him, saying "You are big enough" (to get away with this).
I hate myself for hating them
but along with Annie Lennox, Freddies voice is the one that makes me reach for the off button if they ever come on the radio. "I Want To Break Free" is very possibly my least favourite record of all time.
This is the Queen song
for people who don't like Queen:
Forget the novelty stuff like I Want to Break Free (although personally, I think that's a great pop song) - this is the heart of their appeal, and I 'heart' this song!
Actually
the greatest moment in the history of rock happens at around 0.28 when Brian May's peerless riff kicks in. Fact!
In all seriousness, I think that is the greatest rock record of all time. Smoke on the Water? Meh!
Less Marmite just inconsistent
I think there are good and bad Queen songs. Most of the later ones are bad but there was some shocking stuff on the early albums along with the hits and a fair few others that could just have easily been singles too.
I would agree with
Uncle Wheaty completely, my sentiments entirely.
The 'three years at the peak' thing?
Leaving Queen and Queen II out of it, the run of albums from Sheer Heart Attack (1974) to News of the World (1977) was pretty damn good and although quality dropped off after that, they could still pull out at least one killer tune per album for many years, as someone noted above (Fat Bottomed Girls, Bicycle Race, Don't Stop Me Now, Another One Bites the Dust, Crazy Little Thing Called Love, Under Pressure, Radio Gaga, I Want to Break Free, Hammer to Fall, One Vision, I Want It All ... all released 1978-89) ... then the Innuendo album (1991) was really a Freddie benediction - he died in November that year ...
Confession - I had a look at this thread then got lost on Spotify and Wikipedia, because - nostalgia - Queen were hitting their peak when I was starting secondary school and in those pre-punk days, a lot of Queen tunes were hard-wired into my pubescent brain ... Infatuations don't last of course and it was hard to be seen to like Queen after punk arrived. Aside from smiling at the videos, I more or less ignored them after News of the World ... their Live Aid performance jogged some happy memories, but the next thing to truly penetrate my consciousness was Fred's death ...
So much for me - and your point caller? Looking back now, they were a hairy-arsed rock band fronted by the campest man in showbiz, they could make your ears bleed (Tie Your Mother Down) or toss off a little music hall number (Seaside Rendezvous), release the most overblown faerie myth nonsense (most of Queen II) or regularly storm the pop charts (roughly 15 years of hit singles). I think that pretty much qualifies them as a band of interest, irrespective of the Marmite thing.
Finally, I know a poster above shrank at the idea of I Want to Break Free, but according to Brian May the video screwed up the American market for the group (too gay) - and it was initially banned by MTV. Banned by MTV - how cool is that?
Glad you mentioned Live Aid...
I watched it again recently and they really were right on the money that day. Brilliant stuff. I was a Smash Hits reader at the time & remember the review - something along the lines of 'and what's this? I can hardly believe it but the kids at Wembley all appear to be wigging out to Queen!'
Might even have been written by Mark Ellen.
I think
that like most talented artists, they have had many fallow periods but always had the potential to come up with something surprising or of quality. Like most, I think their Seventies singles are unimpeachable, although the albums were variable with the exception of Night at the Opera (all good). In the Eighties they still made some great singles although not as many (AOBTD, Under Pressure). Unlike some, I think there are some outstanding songs on The Works: Radio Gaga is elegant and expresses a great sentiment; Hammer to Fall is a rousing rocker. Some of their best work was on the last 'proper' album Innuendo. The title track is one of my all-time fave Queen songs, a fantastic portmanteau redolent of their early themes. The response to other songs on the album (I'm Going Slightly Mad; These Are The Days Of Our Lives)is inevitably coloured by the context of Freddie's condition, but they are great songs nonetheless; the latter in particular never fails to move me.
So, Queen - a lot of good stuff, a lot of average by-numbers stuff, some utter dross; probably on a par with most artists of their longevity. But I wish Brian and Roger would retire the name with dignity, and not trawl it around like some two-bob whore.
Totally agree
I've been a Queen fan since Bohemian Rhapsody came out as a single - it was the first one I ever bought in 1975 - Boots in Birmingham.
I still marvel at 'Night at the Opera' and 'Day at the Races' but as they became more commercial and popular - they sold out and my interest in them waned.
Two recent things come to mind. Firstly - I though they were dreadful on X-Factor - Queen has become a brand and as Mikhail says they need to put the group to bed. Brian and Roger will never be a replacement for Freddie and signing up a replacement singer for each tour does not cut it for me. I will not go and see Queen play with Paul Rogers because I know I will be really disappointed.
Secondly - all this fuss about a new greatest hits album - Queen were a rock group and all their great stuff is being forgotten in the name of flogging the 'brand' to a new generation who love 'Radio ga-ga' but have probably never heard of 'Seaside Rendezvous' or 'Love of my life'
I have the first 6 or so albums on my ipod and have gone back to Night at the Opera once more with some really good earphones. Its still fantastic. Last album is pretty special too.
Also ...
Coronation Street imagery, cross-dressing, Fred as a Nijinskian faun, mad ballet, dry ice and transgression-a-go-go ... one of the best pop videos in the history of the world ever? And isn't Roger Taylor *pretty*?
I loved Queen back in the day
Funnily enough, I just mentioned on another board about seeing Mott The Hoople at the Hammersmith Odeon in 1973. I am not ashamed to admit I went specifically to see the support act who were promoting their 5 month old debut album - 'Queen.' I loved them right through 'A Day At The Races.' I got 'News Of The World' for my 18th birthday and was, for the first time, disappointed with a Queen LP. That's where the love affair ended. Probably no coincidence that punk had reared its spiky head in the west country by then.
Shamless punk cash in Sheer
Shamless punk cash in Sheer Heart Attack still sounds great though
even Steve Hillage...
... did a "shameless punk cash in" - 1988 Aktivator?
More straightforward
They made some records I liked, some I didn't. Then they played Sun City , so I thought they were shits. End of.
I had a problem.
I liked a few Queen songs. But my Auntie Hilary, the staunch, church-going, uptight holier-than-thou one, was a huge Queen fan. I couldn't like Queen for that reason.
One day there was a problem. You remember those moments? You heard something said in a certain way by a certain person in a certain place which, as with Proust and his Madeline, burns itself into the psyche? This was such a moment. John "Eddie" Edwards, foul-mouthed sage of class 2E, late 1980, in the changing-rooms, post gym-class, having regaled us with a particularly ripe interpretation of Ottawan's D.I.S.C.O. passed on his opinions as regards one Frederic Bulsara. "Freddie fuckin' Mercury.. 'e's a fuckin' bender, innee? 'S why vey's cawed fuckin' Queen, innit? 'Cos 'e's a fuckin' poofter, innee?"
We, of course, begged to differ and asked for a reasoned debate to be opened on the matter. Eddie informed us that his older brother had told him so and that his brother would be delighted to join the debate in a somewhat physical manner.
We decided to adjourn. Eddie's Big Bruv being a noted nutter.
I did wonder, however, how Auntie Hilary would react if Eddie's brother's words proved true.
Ten years along, she shat purple bricks.
The main riff from Now I'm Here is still a proper killer, though. The first tune I heard on a serious bit of hi-fi. It sounded great.
Queen
are unutterable tosh. Piffle raised to grandiosity by rococo flourish and and innumerable layers of lacquer.
They for me form a triumvirate of tosh - along with ELO and Abba.
The one quality that informs almost any music I truly care for is a quality of soul.
Even Kraftwerk have soul. Queen and the others above do not. It's that simple really.
Seems bizarre to me that anyone would accuse Abba
of having 'no soul'. Have you heard The Name Of The Game or Winner Takes It All?
yes
Must agree with dannyboy.
Frankly staggered by your post, Sheev! Queen and ELO - ok, definite guilty pleasures territory. But Abba? No soul? There's more soul in SOS, to name but one, than in the entire output of countless more 'critically lauded' acts. To me, smartarses like Armando Iannucci and Steve Coogan taking the piss out of Abba and Kate Bush just demonstrate they are not music fans. Tiresome, tbh.
er, you are entitled to your opinion, of course!
The soul of Abba
They certainly cover "soulful" topics - primarily love and it's disintegration - and yet they address it in ways all too mannered and arch
Of course, they are not writing or singing in their native tongue - which may be part of the issue. For me they exhibit at times the all-too perfect diction of a brilliant EFL student or alternatively a slight lyrical clunkiness. This is perfectly exhibited by "The Day Before You Came". Often held up as their masterpiece - for me the paradigm of their all-not-quite-rightness. Their musical arrangements lack the subtlety of, say, The Bee Gees - let alone The Beatles - to whom they are sometimes compared.
They remind me of Saab cars - well engineered, nicely equipped - and with an allegedly beguiling quirkiness. But actually not quite as good as a common or garden Ford and certainly not in the Mercedes class
Let's agree to disagree.
Personally, I find that a mix of gorgeous melodies and melancholic sentiment is always a winner (see also - The Carpenters), and they were the ultimate expression of this, certainly for a multi-million selling pop phenomenon. But you've given a fair reply, one I still disagree with, but it's good to know you've based it on something deeper than the usual 'they wore silly clothes'.
Love The Carpenters too.
Great songs by great singers...what's not too love?
Carpemters?
Now you're talking. Their take on Leon Russell's "A Song for You" is one of mankind's greatest greatest achievement snd "Superstar" is equally sublime.
Thanks
for alerting me to Leon Russell, Sheev. I have to admit to not being aware of him before, but I see he wrote another song I love which The Carpenters also covered as well as George Benson - 'This Masquerade'.
His biog page on Spotify has some fantastic photos of his (quite literally, apparently) godlike appearance. So good they used them twice!
I must say though, I think his voice might take some getting used to:
http://open.spotify.com/track/2l9UM2IVGSulrohfekmKdr (Leon)
http://open.spotify.com/track/7hMK0MRa9X5NzUd4cSFsWn (Karen)
But to be fair, anyone alongside Karen Carpenter is going to suffer by comparison...
Leon Russell
is a god-like genius - with beard to match.
Personally, I love his voice - but then I like Dr John's or Randy Newman's.
Russell also wrote "Superstar" which is the second best Carpenters track.
And then there's "Delta Lady" - which sung by Joe Cocker - with piano, backing vocals and arrangement by Russell on the Mad Dogs and Englishmen tour - is - "Tumbling Dice" aside - the best bit of chooglie-booglie-oogliness ever
piffle
Sorry - I lived through the great days of Queen before they went awfully commercial in the 80's - they certaintly had soul then.
You have to listen to Night at the Opera 35 years on and appreciate the talent of the band in those days.
I never understood ELO - popular as they were in the 70's.
Saw them three times in the early days; 75, 77 & 80
All at the Glasgow Apollo. The last album I bought of theirs was the Game and it was all downhill from there for me. Seeing May & Taylor on X Factor last week even surpassed their collaboration with 5ive for sheer desperation. At least John Deacon had the good grace to retire before things got too bad.
The best Queen album I've heard since A Day At The Races is A Night At the Hip Hopera by The Kleptones. Check it out at http://www.kleptones.com/pages/downloads_hiphopera.html
Interesting how their trip
Interesting how their trip to Sun City is never mentioned these days
i had a letter published in the NME
enquiring as to whether the MU could impose any form of sanction on them for that.
In the last week or so someone posted a photo of Nelson Mandela and Brian May together implying Mandela had forgiven him. I must say I wasn't wholly convinced by the body language!
Queen headlined his 90th birthday concert - boo - ITV cut most of their set -hurrah! May was reportedly devastated upon hearing that most of the band's set was cut out.
What does their playing at Sun City actually mean?
That Queen were rascists? That they approved of the Apartheid regime in South Africa? They were certainly not the only Western musicians to play there - if Wikipedia is to trusted, then Linda Ronstadt and Ray Charles also performed there.
I'm not saying that it was right, but was it SO wrong, just because Silvio Dante said it was?
They mean or may not have been racists
...but they took the racist shilling. At the time Queen gave it the whole "we don't care about politics" line, but that was not credible even then, as they had carried on regardless despite being warned in advance they were breaking the UN cultural boycott.
Then, shamelessly, they came out with (wait for it) "One Vision", which was really taking the piss.
But so many others
did the same thing, yet it's Queen who come in for the flak. I'm curious as to why.
Well, if memory serves...
...when the Queen case came up, with the exception of Linda Ronstadt, it was mainly cabaret artists were going these lucrative gigs in the "homelands", and here I include Ray Charles,
who was not in his finest period, though his going still seemed inexplicable. True, by the historical record Rod Stewart and Elton John might been there before (arguably cabaret artists too by then) , but they are better at keeping this stuff quiet, in the same way they might play exclusive gigs for billionaires now. Or maybe the press just missed it. (And no-one here gave a stuff about Linda Ronstadt, though the Americans felt differently, and she duly caught flak.)
But Queen did get caught and it was a story. They were British, they were rock, they were (despite the image) not a joke, they were still huge and they were not past it. They didn't need this particular dirty money. They were warned, but still they took it, and what's more brazened it out, and what was more seemed to do in their particular hedonistic way, which to some of us was pretty revolting.
Just heard 'Another One Bites The Dust' playing in HMV...
what a great record that is. Chic with a handlebar moustache and leather strides.
John Deacon - top bloke
wrote a couple of million sellers and disappeared into dignified retirement while the other two built a bouncy castle on Fred's grave.
I agree
I saw Roger trying to justify the latest reissue on the BBC Breakfast programme recently.
Even he looked awkward.
They just need to let it go and retire gracefully as Mr Deacon did many years ago.
But as long as the stage
But as long as the stage show does well and they can appear on x-factor - Roger and Brian will milk it for all its worth - its their pension. Its a pity that the records being rehashed for xmas aren't the best ones - just the popular ones.
Dusty
No excuse for 'Sun City'.
Just look at all the flack Dusty Springfield went through in the 60s over refusing to play to segregated audiences in South Africa, and then in the dire 1980s they go down that route. Poor.
Also, they always looked awful......didn't they?
And to make your first, and not your last, record in 1973 is simply climbing the big mountain after everyone has already stuck a flag in it.
Still prefer them to the Clash though.
I'm listening to Graceland at the moment.
Didn't Paul Simon get stick for recording with South African artists? Even though they were black South Africans from the townships..
A great, great album.
Coincidence
Just came up as album of the day on my zen, agree great album.
I judge the music first
And worry about the personal life later. Most of my musical heros have behaved like pillocks at some point in their lives and many of them made it a large part of their career.
I'm not the world's greatest Queen fan, never saw them live though I'd have liked to. But Killer Queen is one of the best pop records of all time and back in the early 80s their Greatest Hits was my housework tape of choice. I have very fond memories of my daughter pedaling about the garden on her little tricycle and singing "I want to ride my bicycle" etc. at the top of her voice. For that alone, they're great.
PS I also like marmite (but prefer vegemite)
Terrible
group. although the "nothing really matters to me" end of that song they did is good.
Sun City
To be forgiven? Not really ... but as someone mentioned above, it's interesting what we expect of our rock stars ...
Flirting with fascist iconography? Acceptable, by and large - think punk swastikas, or new wave band names. Supporting a pernicious and violent worldwide drugs trade by hoovering up vast amounts of coke? Yeah, fine. Acting disgracefully towards young female groupies? Bit of a lad. Behaving like an adolescent git and ending up in A&E where the taxpayer picks up the bill? Woo, rock'n'roll. Self-centred to the point of suicide, causing immense grief to friends and family? Part of the myth. Breaking a cultural boycott on apartheid South Africa? Oh hey now, wait a minute, that's *terrible* ... (Of course, it is terrible, but it's funny how 'rock stars' are still expected to be left wing and progressive.)
The NME
at the time was politically 'worthy' to the point of self-parody, particularly the late Steven Wells. I found it tiresome after a while. Queen made themselves legitimate targets by going to Sun City, but even Paul Simon came in for huge criticism, despite him putting black South African music on the map as no other single figure did. To me, the NME's stance on that was completely wrong-headed. It seemed obvious to me that the huge attention that this would attract could only bring benefits, but the SWP types weren't really interested in engaging with the real, messy, contradictory world, only in maintaining their ideologically perfect 'cultural boycott' stance, in the manner of the Benn-ite Labour Party of 1983.*
And you're right to spotlight the double standards that allowed serial offenders Joy Division / New Order to get away with nary a murmur of criticism, while the far more wide-reaching cultural impact of Graceland was smeared or dismissed.
*(EDIT): on (ahem) a certain other thread, Roy Levy posted a link to an interesting article which is very pertinent to this discussion, I feel. This point in particular:
Queen
They were a singles band weren't they ? they shouldn't have played Sun City, they probably had the best frontman vocalist ever, they wore embarrassing clothes,their legacy is slim but strong.
to accuse ELO and ABBA and Queen of having no soul is to misunderstand soul in music, I think all three had soul especially when you compare them to most of todays music.
most of today's music?
really? Surely you mean 'some' of today's music.
Queen: great, but I can’t stand them
Queen records are brilliant: great songs, well performed, well made. But I can’t stand them. Makes perfect sense to me.
Exactly
...couldn't agree more
Not really Marmite to me
I neither love nor hate them. Their songs are subjected to gross over-exposure, but Boh Rhap, 7 Seas, Fat BG and one or two others are top quality.
I can well imagine Jamie Afro/Archer becoming ther new lead singer. If they want to bring Queen to a new audience, he's probably a good choice.
I love them
Kind Of Magic was "my" era, coming out just as I was getting into secondary school and pop music. And I still think it sounds wonderful.
Sun City, unfortunate - bad, even - but as I've said on another topic, the Catholic church is responsible for incredible quantities of human suffering but I'm happy to listen to a nice Palestrina mass!
I must take issue with MrRadio's "slim legacy" comment though. Their influence on some of the biggest bands of the 1990s and 2000s - I'm thinking Faith No More, Smashing Pumpkins, Muse, Foo Fighters - was deep and strong. I'll bet supposedly cooler bands like Radiohead and Metallica have a few Queen albums stashed away too....
There's only one band I hate more
and that is the Beatles
Queen had a unique talent
for being able to create music in a tone - both the vocals and the guitar - that exactly, with 100% accuracy, every time, made my ears curl in such a way that I would do almost anything to make it stop. I loathe them. They had no redeeming features whatsoever. I wish they'd go away and no one would ever mention them or play their music on radio or TV ever again.
But apart from that...
you thought they were ok?
Oh Yeah.
Obviously - in all other respects apart from their continued, previous and future (musical) existence on the planet, they're fine by me. Wouldn't want anyone getting the wrong idea, or 'owt.