Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Putting the effort in...

Patrick Crowther's picture

I've been studying Italian for a couple of years now, and it really has been one of the most enjoyable things I've done in my life. I don't think I have any natural aptitude for learning languages... I scraped a 'B' in my French O Level, but I've no idea how. My progress in Italian has involved a lot of hard work; pouring over verb tables and commiting to memory the myriad complexities of the grammar. Lying in bed before going to sleep and trying to roll my Rs. Hour upon hour of good, solid effort.

I had a conversation yesterday with my new teacher, and he paid me a great compliment by saying I spoke good Italian for the amount of time I'd been learning. When I heard him say that I forgot about all the times I used to think I was getting nowhere, when the whole business seemed impossible. I know that it's a slow process learning a language and that one just has to be patient.

This reminds me of how frustrated I used to get when I was trying to learn to play the guitar. I just didn't have the patience to learn all the scales, to really dedicate myself to it. And yet I loved music, I loved guitars. I have the dedication required to learn Italian, but I didn't have it with regards to playing music. I can't work it out... I had no great love for all things Italian when I began going to classes, I just thought it would be a fun thing to do. But I was obsessed with music and yet I could never see myself getting to be a really good guitar player. Maybe deep down I believed that one is born with talent and that one can't get to be a really good musician simply by putting the hard graft in... I really don't know.

Do you have your own examples of this? Putting great effort into something and then feeling really good when it starts to pay off? Or plenty of dedication but little reward?

0

Perspective & experience

I have been playing guitar for 32 years now. I was really lucky that I started young and had endless time to play. I've always thought of it as playing, even when it was technically practising - learning scales, modes, chords, different fingerings, timings. I've always encouraged anyone else learning an instrument to have the same idea : you are more likely to make time for 15 minutes play than for 15 minutes practice.

Having said that, I spent most of the first 2 years battering away at the guitar without many underlying concepts, having fun, playing in bands with friends and doing some gigs. Once I learned some music theory, that all became simpler. (If you've still got your guitar, I'd recommend that as an approach - batter away and have some fun!)

On language - getting older has made it easier, in that one thing that held me back when I was younger was the fear of saying the wrong thing. Now I know that if I am in Italy and I can manage to say (in Italian) "Hello, I am Scottish. I am sorry that I do not speak Italian well" before I then ask for whatever it is in Italian, people will generally try hard to understand and help. Same experience in France and Spain - once I have got over my initial fear , there is great warmth for having tried a bit.

That tourist-point-and-smile-with-a-little-"grazie" is obviously a different level from yours, but I speak enough Italian now to be able to get the coffee I want without assistance or upset, and next time we go back I'll have learned more.

So I'd encourage everyone to learn at least enough of the local language where they're going on holiday to be able to ask for "aqua sin gaz" or "cafe con leche" - once you've taken that first step it's a big encouragement to try some more.

0
el hombre malo | 5 July 2009 - 8:23pm

You´re right

I´ve played guitar for 15 years and I never sat down and felt I need to practice. I just play. If you feel like you "practice" and that it´s a "must", maybe it´s just not your thing. I enjoy to just strum for a bit while watching telly. It helps me relax. My fingers can get nervous if I haven´t played for a while. It really is like a drug.

As far as languages go I speak Swedish, English and can pretend to understand Danish and Norweigan. Wish I knew German or French as well.

0
Ola Claesson | 5 July 2009 - 11:12pm

For what it's worth

I think you are either born with a facility for art/music/writing (insert creative discipline of choice) or not, and if not then all the graft in the world will not lift you above journeyman.

In my case I have often felt that I could have been a photographer - in much the same way Peter Cook felt he could have been a judge except he didn't have the Latin. I think I have a reasonably good eye, but actually translating that to the screen or the print is frustratingly overwhelming, or maybe overwhelmingly frustrating.

Oh, and if it's any consolation (to you, obviously not to me!) I never got much further than 'Knocking On Heaven's Door' on the guitar either!

0
Steven C | 5 July 2009 - 8:43pm

I basically agree with you...

but then I think of Hendrix who was supposed to have practised for up to 12 hours a day and took his guitar to bed with him. So how much of his extraordinary talent was down to 'something in the genes' and how much was down to working his arse off?

0
Patrick Crowther | 5 July 2009 - 9:25pm

Interesting

I think most of the "something in the genes" is really-working-your-arse-off-for-years-result. Look at The Beatles schedule in Hamburg. Was it any wonder they were really good once they made it big? And how many crap songs did it take to write Please Please Me?

But then again Brian Wilson claims that Surfer Girl was the first song he ever wrote. Still I would say the hard way is more common.

Even if someone makes it with their debut novel seemingly over night they´ve probably got years and years of writing, reading and honing.

0
Ola Claesson | 5 July 2009 - 11:21pm

Putting yourself down...

Well done on sticking in at the Italian as it does show dedication learning something new. I tried piano and guitar lessons when a child but it was just a chore and I gave up. As I was about to be 40 this year I decided to try something new as I felt I would be more dedicated and started saxophone lessons 9 months ago and have thoroughly enjoyed the experience.

I do however think I have hit a plateau and don't think I am improving yet my teacher tells me and anyone else that will listen that he can't believe how far I have come in a short space of time.

I now think we can be too hard on ourselves and should just enjoy what we can do and I agree with elhombremalo above that a 15 minute play is more productive than an hours "practice"

0
Otis J Watermelon | 5 July 2009 - 9:24pm

well done!

Great to hear you've taken up a new instrument - the plateau is a regular experience. At first you'll have been delighted to get any note out at all. While you're playing on the plateau, you are consolidating a lot of what you have learned and building that for the next rise.

Everyone learning an instrument has the experience - don't let it get you down. As long as you are playing regularly you are making little improvements all the time which will all help build towards the next steep rise when you next crack a new technique.

0
el hombre malo | 5 July 2009 - 10:03pm

Ten thousand hours

Is, apparently, the length of time it takes to get good at something. To what degree natural aptitude gets involved is another thing. Playing the guitar is a strange one. I always found it easy because I'm very musical but this has only taken me to a pretty basic level of strummery, even after twenty five years, because I couldn't be arsed to practice the tricky stuff which actually takes a little dedication. I suppose the key to any of these things is to start early when the aptitude for learning is there and the potential to clock up the 10,000 hours isn't offset by the prospect of retirement looming before competence is gained.

0
Lenny Law | 5 July 2009 - 10:20pm

10,000 hours

is what it takes to get great. Mere goodness takes an as yet unquantified period.

0
Carl Parker | 10 July 2009 - 5:15pm

You have plenty of time to learn

I worked in a hotel bar 17 years ago where a folk session would happen of a Thursday evening. I was just starting guitar and would sneak a go on the great acoustics that the various members of the band had, battering out shite versions of Alternative Ulster and Needle and the Damage Done.
The session leader, Dick Lavery (RIP) came to me one night and in between ordering pints of stout and whiskey and orange (yes W&O) said: 'Dont be in a rush son, you have all your life to learn.'
He's right. It's not how good you get, but what good you get from it.
Mind, I'm still shite, (assumes Vic & Bob voice) but happy.
Keep at it.

0
PaddyH | 5 July 2009 - 10:27pm

Me and you both

You could have well been writing about me Patrick

0
Sour Crout | 5 July 2009 - 10:39pm

There was a very good piece in The Guardian last year

about the idea that genius doesn't reallly exist and that it's hard work in many/all cases that matters rather than some inherent gift or whatever.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/nov/15/malcolm-gladwell-outliers-ex...

Actually that extract has 'expired' oddly. Hmm well it's from a book called OUTLIERS by Malcolm Gladwell. There are extracts knocking about.

0
sandamiano | 5 July 2009 - 11:39pm

Studying a language

50% of my job is language teaching and because i had to learn Spanish from scratch i feel the pain of the Students. The one thing that helped me a lot,when learning Spanish, was knowning how a language worked. At first it was really hard but my initial knowledge of English grammar was poor. When that improved,my understanding of Spanish improved dramatically.
The problem with learing the guitar for me was "The Language and grammar" what the hell is the difference between a major chord and a minor chord ? what's a quarter note ? in Open C ? might have well as been nuclear physics for all i knew. I felt like i'd have way too much to learn to get good.
Did all this terminology put anyone off ?

0
Sour Crout | 6 July 2009 - 8:08am

How To Speak Guitar

Depending on what level of expertise you aspire to, it's possible to make a highly satisfactory guitar-ish noise knowing virtually nothing about the language - short of the names of the chords, which is essential. You only need to know that putting 'these' fingers 'here' makes A minor - you don't need to know why it's a minor or what, technically, stops it being a major. And that it sounds a bit sad and is the vital first step to playing In The House Of The Rising Sun. I know the square root of sod all about music theory, but if I played you a song, you'd recognise it - and that's good enough for me. However, if you're thinking of ascending the higher slopes of the neck (where I rarely venture) into solo land, some technical nous might be invaluable. Any lead-lick players care to comment further?

0
Vernier Caliper | 6 July 2009 - 8:43am

Good analogy : Grammar / Music Theory

As I said above, you can have a lot of fun battering about on the guitar with a few chords. (I certainly did).

Music theory is actually fairly straightforward but I agree it looks imposing. Once I learned a bit of theory (majors/minors as a start) lots of previously cloudy aspects of the guitar came into focus. But by that point I had played half a dozen gigs.

Understanding the relationships of notes and chords at a theoretical level does help you to articulate your playing better.

Exactly the same as grammar (above) - if you understand subject/verb/object, and verb tenses, then that will help you to learn a new language. But you can also batter on, learning phrases as you go, picking up the grammar later.

0
el hombre malo | 6 July 2009 - 9:02am

all i want to see is

"put middle finger on third string from the top on fret number 2" or something simpler. Actually Guitar pro on the computer is pretty cool. I've learned to play "Smoke on the Water" on one string

0
Sour Crout | 6 July 2009 - 4:29pm

Number two on your set list...

Have a go at Wild Thing. It's the Stairway To Heaven/Sweet Child O' Mine piece de resistance of the one-string virtuoso and the first thing I ever picked out on a guitar. Which, fortuitously enough, only had one string.

0
Vernier Caliper | 6 July 2009 - 4:47pm

Thanks to Danny Baker

I can play "Smoke on the Water" on a touch tone phone

0
Sour Crout | 6 July 2009 - 6:45pm

Can I help?

Basic music theory is quite simple. First you need to know how to work out the major scale in any key.

All notes on most instruments are seperated by semi-tones. Hit any note on a piano or guitar and the note below or above is a semi-tone apart. Therefore 2 notes apart is a tone.

Hit any note on the guitar or piano and then go tone tone semitone tone tone tone semitone. This will give you the major scale (most commonly known as doh, rei, me, fah, soh etc etc).

For example let's take the key of C Major as it's the simplest to explain as there are no sharps or flats in it.

Hit C then tone tone semitone tone tone tone semitone and you will have C Major which is C D E F G A B C.

A major chord always consists of notes 1 3 and 5 of the scale so C major consists of C E and G.

A minor chord always consists of the same three notes but you flatten the third note so a C minor chord consists of C Eflat and G.

For a seventh, you flatten the seventh note, then add it so C7 will have a Bflat in it.

A quarter note is a crotchet, a half note is a minim and a full note is a semi-brieve.

Don't know what open C is but tuning a guitar in open D you simply tune the string to D A D F# A D. Tuning down another full step (tone) would give you open C but the strings would be too slack to play.

0
bigsteviecook | 6 July 2009 - 12:24pm

Test

on Friday.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 6 July 2009 - 1:37pm

Sorry Stevie

but i got lost at Semi-Tones but i'm going to stick with it. thanks for the explanation.

0
Sour Crout | 6 July 2009 - 4:27pm

Hehehe....

...the fret next to the one you are playing is a semitone above(or below)....two frets is a tone.

I've been playing (at) guitar for round about 35 years. I'm still hopeless, but I do love playing.

I only learned all this music theory stuff when my son started playing keyboards/piano and saxophone about 4 years ago. I still sit with him most nights when he practises and because he has to learn the theory for his exams, we can bumble through it together with my basic knowledge of the guitar and the fact that I know how all the tunes go.

He did jazz saxophone for a couple of years....I was (am) totally lost with these scales....but I could find out if I wanted to. I don't have the inclination or the time really.

0
bigsteviecook | 6 July 2009 - 4:55pm

There's no need to be a virtuoso....

...as said above, to be able to play like SRV or BB King you're going to need 10,000 hours of practise.

Listen to Johnny Cash recorded in Rick Rubin's living room. American Recordings is the name of the album. Just Cash with an acoustic guitar. Some of it actually sounds like it is being played by a beginner.

I'm assuming you're a frustrated beginner Patrick....please forgive me if I've assumed wrong!

0
bigsteviecook | 6 July 2009 - 12:32pm

Actually, no...

I've played guitar for... let me see... 27 years! Actually make that 24 years as I haven't picked one up for the last 3. I got to a reasonable standard... I suppose I could have been in a band if I'd wanted to. Now I have no desire to play anymore... I'd rather listen to people who are really good doing it.

0
Patrick Crowther | 6 July 2009 - 1:14pm

I feel that away

...about Italian - much rather hear that most romantic of languages breathily enunciated by a dark haired beauty than mangle it meself. (insert image of Monica Bellucci here).

0
Steerpike | 6 July 2009 - 2:17pm

I hate hearing myself speak Italian... che brutto!

La lingua italiana è bella, ma non quando sono io ad usarla.

Il mio accento italiano fa cacare...

0
Patrick Crowther | 6 July 2009 - 4:53pm

Prego!

(Seems to be the answer for most things when understanding is limited)

0
Steerpike | 6 July 2009 - 5:07pm

Yes, prego is useful... but you should have said 'boh'.

I wrote 'The Italian language is beautiful, but not when I use it. My Italian accent is shite.'

0
Patrick Crowther | 6 July 2009 - 5:43pm

A few years ago

I was passing through Turin Airport and the girl behind the cafe cash register asked me for 5 Euros and 55 cents. (ie. 5.55)

I actually asked her to say it again. Never have I heard something so mundane sound so wonderful.

0
Steerpike | 6 July 2009 - 8:07pm

Cinque cinquantacinque...

molto, molto sexy.

0
Patrick Crowther | 10 July 2009 - 5:10pm

6.66 Euro...

sei sessantasei... diabolicamente sexy.

0
Patrick Crowther | 10 July 2009 - 5:11pm

Scuse!

Scuse, sono escosezze, non parliamo italiano bene, mi dispiacci.

0
el hombre malo | 6 July 2009 - 5:52pm

You ain't wrong

I wrote 'The Italian language is beautiful, but not when I use it. My Italian accent is shite.'
Substitute Spanish for Italian and it's welcome to my world.
¿Y tu tambien Archie ?

0
Sour Crout | 6 July 2009 - 6:49pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2010 Development Hell Ltd