Entertainment For Lively Minds
Professional writers posting on here...
Posted by BernkastelCues on 11 August 2011 - 10:56am.
Definitely not an attempt to resurrect the "Clique" schism again, but after reading this blog for a number of years ("recent caller, but long time listener Tim") I'm of the opinion that there is a bit of a difference between the - if you like - amateur posters, and a goodly number who I suspect write for a living?
Anyone willing to fess up to being a professional scribe?
- More from BernkastelCues.
- Login or register to post comments










What sort of difference
and does it matter?
Writing for a living
I write technical documentation for a living so I suppose I'm a professional writer but I'm guessing that's not what you mean.
It's pretty well paid but ultimately rather worthless as most of my output ends up in user guides and contracts where (hopefully) it is never actually read.
Anything I write here is for pleasure as it's a great place to talk about stuff that really captures my interest.
Oh, I used to do technical documentation too.
Really enjoyed it. also worked as a radio producer too.
Me too
IBM CICS VSE V2.1 System Definition and Operations Guide. My finest work*.
(*actually I only updated it)
I have a saturday morning radio show
write bits and pieces, did a few Daz ads, I... *s**t* you've rumbled me. very cunning!
YDFMD
I am actually Martin Amis.
Don't tell
Julian Barnes ...
Julian Barnes actually posts here...
Under the name BernkastelCues I hear.
That's him
snookered then. ..
Thanks for making me look up
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernkastel-Kues ... what turns out to be a famous wine-growing area ...
It's a total coincidence
According to my uncle Bob Gewurztraminer
I am
and the reason I ended up here, in fact, is because someone told me that one of my books was mentioned on the podcast.
Which podcast
was that?
I've been a professional writer
and I hope to be again, because I can't really do anything else.
I hadn't noticed any huge disparity in writing quality here - I wouldn't know who was professional and who wasn't. Never thought about it.
This is one of the few blogs I use because the writing is consistently good. I avoid most internet discussions because the level of spelling, grammar, etc is dire (quick spellcheck to see I haven't made any howlers while being pompous) but apart from that, 99% of discussions elsewhere develop into
death-threats around the fifth comment.
Anyway, better get back to resurrecting my "career."
I is
prufeshenul riter and luv revueing on amazone. lol
Thats like
That ad on the tube in the 70's.
If yu cn rd this.....
"I can't really do anything else"
...I share that feeling, Mac! I used to be a professional writer for newspapers/magazines (1994-2001) and then made the mistake - for reasons that seemed valid at the time - of taking a nondescript public sector job. Anything useful or interesting I've been fortunate enough to have been involved in over the past 10 years has had more to do with music/art/writing in spare time than what I do for a living - which has, frankly, been a colossal waste of time. But like you, I'm moving slowly but surely towards a new phase.
I do agree, though, that there's a lot of hugely engaging - funny, informed, wry, intelligent, etc - writing on this forum from all sorts of people, and I'm delighted the hierarchy is completely 'flat' and open to all. It's empowering and it's generally good fun. Only once did I get the impression a professional writer was being judgemental about non-professional writers on this forum. But it's so rare it's not worth getting into a row over.
I am...
...Georgette Heyer.
Welcome Georgette !
And can I say you are looking very well at 108. An inspiration to us all.
And as Martin's dad, Kingsley
can *I* say we've missed you in the land beyond lately-I can see why the place attracts you though.
Heyer today...
Donne tomorrow!
I am...
...Stephen King.
BOO!
Ha, gotcha!
I used to get paid to write
Now I don't.
Not sure why...
Someone who can't even spell, writes ...
that its fairly ridiculous to compare most of what goes on on this blog as "professional writing." Unless I missed something. sheesh
What do you mean?
There are a good few contributors to this site that I feel are of a professional standard, and not all of them are professional writers.
Marky
I didn't read your comment before I posted my reply to the original post.
But it left me feeling a bit deflated.
I know you were self-deprecating about your own spelling, so you weren't trying to sound superior or anything, and maybe I misread the tone. But it came across as somewhat mean.
Perhaps I've got my rose-tinted specs on again, but I thought about the OP, and my immediate response was to say: 'yes, there are some great writers on here', but also to stress that we don't have to be great writers to contribute. Your response was to denigrate 'most of what goes on on this blog'.
I think this is usually a friendly and welcoming place - recently less so. Perhaps because of comments that come across as lacking any generosity of spirit. Sheesh.
Agreed...
...it's not a competition, it's a conversation. No Pulitzer prizes required nor sought. The minute that mentality takes hold - where the only people posting are people trying to impress others with their sentence formation, use of language and structure of content - I'll be waving cheerio, and I'm sure many, many others would do likewise. It's just a bit of fun, isn't it - and the world really needs that kind of thing...
the giving of Awards might have been a mistake though
I agree with what you say Colin, it's just a bit of fun and not to be taken seriously. Which is why I think the reader awards idea was misguided, because suddenly it is a competition.
Personally...
... I don't post here thinking "at last the Word bloggers award is in my grasp" and I'd feel sorry for anyone who did that.
But then again, speaking as Martin Amis (who I am), I've not even won the booker...
To be fair
I think the awards were also just a bit of fun and not to be taken seriously.
You could well have a point, Nick...
...and I agree with the post below that suggests its possible to have a good effect in the 'real world' (ie awards bash, feelgood vibes all round etc) and simultaneously perhaps a not so good effect in the 'virtual world' (er, that'd be here. Specifically, on the latter, a back-of-the-mind feeling that you have to raise your game somehow or make every post an entry in a blog-post-writing competition.
I know this isn't Backwards7's fault, but this creeping notion - I've sensed it and I know others have - that we're somehow all in the shadow of Backwards as blog posters is not a good thing. I say that with absolutely no disrespect to Backwards - he does his thing, which often involves quite substantial, well-prepared short-storyesque postings of surrealist wit and observation which give a lot of pleasure to a lot of people, but others do OTHER things - according to available time or temperament or preference, I guess: some perhaps specialising in very brief witticisms or double-entendres, others in Victor Meldrew-ish splurges of exasperation at life's absurdities, others in slam-dunks of pure musical enthusiasm, and so on and so forth. All of it good!
The variety of BOTH style and content is what makes this place so enriching, all made possible by the general goodwill and general lack of any 'pointscoring' mentality.
If the reader awards are held again this year I'd hope very much - in keeping with their spirit - that nobody is given the same award as they were last year, otherwise I suspect it really will edge, however subliminally, closer to being a year-round competition in terms of the on-blog atmosphere.
I know I'm probably in a minority,
but Backwards7 is one of the writers I tend to avoid. Not to my taste - a little too Upper VIth form for me. Though I can see why others might be impressed. Each to their own!
Brevity rules
Likewise I seldom read those interminable (and intimidating) 5,000 word essays that regularly show up on the blog.
I mean, they're probably really well written and everything but, hey, there simply aren't enough hours in the day.
Length
A lot of the long pieces are worth reading but yes, some of them are obviously long for the sake of being long. Verbosity masquerading as insight.
It's not a competition
I don’t think that anyone who received a WORD award last year thought to themselves “bloody hell I’ve made it.” I attached my rosettes to the artificial Christmas tree that I bought from ASDA when I was eight. When Christmas was over they went in the cardboard box with the rest of my decorations. Now they’re in an airing cupboard behind a big stack of folded towels that nobody ever uses.
I am not a professional writer. I’m a hospital temp. I don’t have much ambition in terms of climbing the career ladder but I do believe in doing a good job and engaging in the minutiae of life. This afternoon I filed paperwork and answered the phone. I put as much effort into doing that as I will put into whatever I write next.
I am not in competition with anyone. Nothing that I’ve written here is intended to impress the editorial staff on the WORD. Most of these people have met me in person. They know firsthand that I am an idiot who can barely function in a social setting. I am not using this site get a foot in the door.
This blog is a joint effort. It is only as good as we make it. I try to write worthwhile posts out of respect for the other contributors and readers. It's depressing that some people here will single out a piece of writing in which some care and effort has been taken and ascribe the most base, self-interested motives to its author.
let me just say this
as the person who opened this hornet's nest: I voted for you. Love your stuff.
From our point of view
The awards were simply a way of saying thank you to those people who'd invested their time in the website, and to those organising events in the real world - it's not something that magazines generally do. We hired a room, everyone was invited, a bunch of people came along, a few of them were presented with cheap rosettes, and I'd be horrified if anyone begrudged those people such baubles. As for whether we'll do it again, we haven't decided yet, but the grumpiness surrounding what was meant to be a thank you from us has obviously made us think twice. The awards were also just a bit of fun and not to be taken seriously.
Amen to that.
Can I make a plea? Could some people please STOP BEING SO THIN SKINNED... please.
Absolutely...
...totally agree on the 'joint effort' and 'bit of fun' stuff chaps (Backwards and Fraser). In case there's any misunderstanding, I'm happy to clarify that I'm not criticising Backwards's postings or the awards notion in any way, shape or form. I thought the awards was a fabulous idea and - personally - I thought lots of well deserving people got noticed. Unlike Hughie Green I really DO mean that most sincerely!
Despite the Paula Yates connection
I suspect you might have to explain who Hughie Green is to many of the young whippersnappers who post here.
Amazed
I'm amazed that anyone would get the arse about an event which was great fun, nowt more, nowt less. The whole thing, rosettes and all, was for a laugh, no more no less. And I got a kiss off Drakeygirl so nah.
How could I resist that
splendid moustache?
November approacheth
I'm growing another one!
I never noticed
Drakeygirls moustache.
And yeah, shurrup, it was a laugh. If you were there you would have known how tongue firmly in cheek it was and the general monhomie. As Danny Kelly often says when he heard the whining voice of the cynical "Belt up miseryguts, you're spoiling it for the rest of us"
Guilty as charged
I do that! Well, not trying to impress people as such, but trying to write as well as I can. I don't think that's out of place in the online offshoot of a magazine called Word which prides itself on the quality of its contributors.
But I also think good writing is about making the reader not notice the building blocks (sentence construction, vocabulary, structure) and enjoy the content, rather than showing off the scaffolding. Most people here can do that. Not sure I always manage it ('online offshoot' is a bit wanky, isn't it?) but it's fun trying.
Ex-pro, by the way.
But then again...
... you are actually Peter Carey, with a house built from booker prizes and word blogger awards.
I must admit my heart sank when the 'awards' idea
was mooted last year. But the whole thing seemed to be handled quite well. Judging by the reports and pics it seemed more like a 'big night out' for the Word community with the awards as just something to hang the night on..
Mine did too
I think it's entirely possible for an idea to have good consequences in the "real" world and not-so-good consequences in the "virtual" world simultaneously.
[edit: To clarify, my heart did not sink (slightly) because I felt people didn't deserve the awards, the people who won clearly did. It's the action and reaction illustrated in this blog thread that I thought would be the downside. But the tensioning of real and virtual lives is a work in progress for us all, anyway.]
I got a nice letter and a rosette
for organising meetings in the North-West.
It wasn't asked for, I wasn't glory-hunting, I only found out after the event as I couldn't make it down to the actual meeting.
I post occasionally, am not funny or erudite.
It was nice for them to take the time and effort to thank me. I was touched.
They're giving something back. I can't complain about that.
Well yes
that's true.
I even have a Pull-it Surprise:
I'm a sucker for a fart gag
edit: OK, everyone calm down, I wasn't intending to denigrate anyone's efforts or the validity of the awards given, I was just expressing a view. I am not one of those who frets about cliques. I think we are an inclusive lot and I consider some of you as friends, even though I may not have met you.
Peace & Love, Peace & Love, but no autographs, I'm far too busy...
Duvet
That's a kind of cover isn't it, Good heavens man, you're not a Russki are you?
Relaxes back out of 50's mode..............
Thank you for your always mild and reasonable response
...Drakeygirl. Seeing as you seem to be one of the regular participants in this blog who actually don't resort to defensive put-downs and occasional insults, I will respond..
MY DEFINITION OF PROFESSIONAL WRITING: someone who considers what they write carefully. And has a range of acquired and considered technical skills in order to do this. And the definition of "professional" incidentally, is that they are paid a living wage for their efforts.
My reason for even posting this opinion in this thread? Why would anyone even bother to ask the question about "professional writers" posting on a web blog, attached to a magazine that exists mainly on the quality of its writing ? - I don't get it, it seems ridiculous and a little presumptuous to me.
Was I mean? yes probably a little, with my tongue in my cheek. Did I have a good reason for being mean - yes. Possibly motivated partly because, with one or two exceptions, I have not personally found this blog either "friendly" or "welcoming."
"lacking any generosity of spirit" - eek. I seriously hope you wouldn't find me that way if we met Drakeygirl.
eek
Thanks for responding, Marky.
I'm a little saddened that you would say that you hadn't found with blog friendly or welcoming apart from one or two exceptions. My experience is the reverse of that: the vast majority of people are generous and friendly, with maybe the odd exception.
Part of that friendliness and generosity probably comes from most people deciding to ignore threads they think are a waste of their time because they don't interest them. Or because they find them 'ridiculous' or 'presumptuous'.
If you think about it, every thread is presumptuous, because it presumes someone else will want to read it.
There are many occasions I've hummed and ha-ed about posting something, wondering whether anyone else will be remotely interested. (Like my latest post, about how a song reminded me of a pig, for God's sake!)
But I think when it comes down to it, all I could see that Bernkastel was saying was: "Does anyone out there on the blog write for a living?" because he was genuinely interested to know.
If, like me, you spend way too much time here, you might find yourself sometimes idly wondering what other posters do for a living. You might say this was presumptuous, but I would say it was curiosity.
I just think we need to be careful not to be too judgemental about what people post. If you don't like it, move on. If every post was analysed for its 'worth' then no bugger would post here for fear of being shot down with scorn. (Please understand, I'm not pleading for a blog where no-one argues. The cut and thrust of people sharing their wildly different opinions can be a joy. Or a horror, if it descends into personal insults. Besides, what would I do with Kid A, our collective goat?).
Maybe we could discuss this over a beer one day. But maybe, in the meantime, you might want to take me up on a genuine suggestion. Start a post about something close to your heart. Maybe your favourite song, or something that's tickled you, or impressed you. I'd read it, and perhaps comment on it, if it stirred me, amused me, or if I liked it.
I used to work in newspapers
but then the chippy started using different wrapping.
I think there are people here who write for a living. There are also people here who should write for a living. It all adds to the mix. But I don't think it means anything in particular.
I admire some posts on here because they are exquisitely written, with real style and panache. Some I like because they brilliantly express complex arguments in a lucid and clear manner. And some I love because they are rambling, emotive streams of consciousness blurted out after a night spent on the pop.
If I see poor spelling and punctuation on signs in shops or in the official literature from a big company, it annoys me to an absurd degree. But on here? Nope. If someone is making an original point, expressing a sincere emotion, or making a silly gag, an apostrophe in the wrong place doesn't make their opinion any less valid or enjoyable.
It's a bit like the argument about how you can't truly appreciate music if you haven't played an instrument. Just because you can't spell for toffphey* (*joke) doesn't mean you can't start a fantastic thread. (I still reserve the right to gently poke fun if anyone makes a 'rude word' typo. I just c*nt help myself).
Rude typos
My girlfriend is half-French and was sent an email by a colleague recently which included the phrase, "c'est horrible!"
Well, at least, he thought it did. My girlfriend was very bemused and slightly offended to receive a message which said, "chest horrible!"
In my time
I've written reports that have advised product managers of the readiness for launch of new telephones AND have written user guides for manpower recruitment strategy software. I'd like to think this comes across in my selection of bon mots and witty remarks.
Once upon a time
I holed myself up in an Amsterdam BnB for the weekend to write a mobile phone user manual. It wasn't quite 'staying up for days in the Chelsea Hotel.'
God, I hope it's true that nobody reads the instructions.
That's the best excuse ever...
"No, darling, it's a work trip. I'll be stuck in a B+B all weekend writing a mobile phone user manual."
Hang on
You're not THE James EB from the Nokia 5110 UK manual 1999, are you? That's my favourite user guide EVAH! *faints though being star-struck*
Of course it's true
Or to be more precise (and make a sweeping sexist generalization while I'm at it), men don't. Male engineers in particular don't read manuals on principle - if they can't work it out, they're clearly not much cop.
but it *was*
a lost weekend in a hotel in Amsterdam?
Shitehouse poets...
...not me I'm afraid.
Though there are plenty here I'm glad to say.
iM' KaTiE_ pRiCe
HEaR mE RoAR. mE WRiT gOoD iNNiT.
I am...
Bruce Dickinson.
And there was me thinking
you're Geddy Lee!
If...
only. :-)
No! I am Bruce Dickicus!
No! I am Bruce Dickicus!
Do we have a Bwooce? What about Wod?
Does Wod Stewart post?
I didn't want to come across all showy but...
I'm actually Julie Burchill & even though I've lost my looks I can still write, right guys?
i read that post in a very squeaky voice
... (in my head)
Strictly amateur hour over here
I created, wrote, and distributed a short-lived series of science fiction fanzines back in the Eighties (when "science fiction" still generally meant books rather than films and TV shows), but these had a tiny print run of about 100 copies per issue, and were distributed free-of-charge at UK SF conventions in exchange for "the usual" (i.e. contribution, letter of comment, show of interest or editorial whim).
Other than that, as a Project Manager I write more than enough Business Cases, Project Briefs, Highlight Reports and so stultifyingly forth. It's writing, Jim, but not as you probably mean it.
ditto
Reports, reviews, courses. What I do but not what I think of as writing. More typing.
I do have a book coming out this summer (if the publisher ever gets round to it) which is my first stab at a management text book. And not something anyone would regard as "writing". Funnily enough I fancied being a writer when I was a kid, but never fancied the actual effort involved.
Well, not everyone can be a professional writer...
Although I'm sure it is an aspiration for a good few amateurs here, myself included.
I agree that the quality of the written word is high amongst the Massive, which is what keeps me coming back - it sure isn't the (infrequent) stirring, bitching and whining.
I have a great deal of respect for anyone who writes for a living, I'm certain that it is hard work, and requires true commitment. I just wish I'd had a bit more foresight, maybe been better organised, and I might be doing it myself by now. All power to your PCs, typewriters, quills and wrists.
I'm not a professional writer
but I am sleeping with one
Heh
I married one!
As a soap writer
... my first thought was that you are both taking about the same person.
Duf duf duhduhduh, etc.
feel the quality
This is the only forum I visit as it meets all my needs blog-wise. When I lived in Madrid I was a features writer for InMadrid magazine. It didn't pay as many bills as teaching though. Now, as ( a very small) part of my job, I have to produce 5 newsletters a month, but it's kinda salesy and very samey. I'm also involved in editing a friend's magnum opus. I love the writing here for many reasons, most of which have been beautifully put in a post above by the good vibe power station that is Drakeygirl.
And while singling people out for praise is often counter-productive as others feel excluded, I'll happily take that risk and say that I would have no hesitation whatsoever in parting with my hard-earned cash to buy anything published by backwards7.
feel the quality
Yes sir, so good he posted twice. *blushes*
postman
.make mine a triple...
I am a published writer.
And a lot of my stuff is broadcast on national radio.
Or to phrase it slightly differently.. I once had a bit published in FHM. I was paid £200. The subs made it readable. And Simon Mayo has read out some of my emails. Mark Radcliffe read out one as well. And so did Ken Bruce.
And I should probably mention that the thing in FHM was about wanking.
Making money hand over fist.
...
I'll get my grubby old coat.
You'll have to ask
Lenny to give it back...
Lenny, I may have a job for you
on my new magazine:
Pah.
These superficial rags are an insult to those of us who work at the coalface of onanism. I have suffered for my art. Away with you, Mr Duvet, and your shabby pamphlets. Those of us who shave their palms on a daily basis shall have no truck with your tawdry publications.m
Now. Where was I? Oh yes.. Put the melon in the microwave..
I am
It's no secret. Unlike my tireless work for charity.
Do you get free crisps?
I wish
I could sell them on, and make more money than I've ever made from writing. Very few people (including me) earn nearly enough for a living wage these days, without supplementing it with non-writing jobs / the dole.
Reminds me of
popping into my favourite second hand shop once a week to pick up pristeen copies of promo cds obviously offloaded by some off my city's finest music writers for cash. Result for them, for the shop and especially for me..
Samuel Johnson
And, of course, this blockhead had to use HTML 'blockquotes' to format that.
I write melodramas for a living.
I'd absolutely die if I couldn't write.
Coulda been somebody...
Three years local news, 20 years newsstand mags, 11 years telly production... *sigh*
Instead of a bum.
I am Bertie Wooster..
..and would contribute more to this b. if only Jeeves would surrender that blasted mustard checked writing vest he seems to have spirited away to g. knows where.
I said to him yesterday, "Jeeves, do not treat me as a child," as he helped me on with my dinner j.
..and I meant it to sting!
I endeavour
to give satisfaction, Sir.
Sort of
I used to be a local newspaper reporter and sub-editor - probably the worst paid "career" in the country. Still, had fun with words...my favourite headline was:
Man in
death
plunge
riddle
I used to use it as frequently as possible - front page, right hand single column story, four deck headline - even if the actual story wasn't relevant. It just used to fit so neatly...and we had a car park in Lincoln from which people used to "plunge."
Now I write marketing/PR guff - stringing cliches together about "flexible solutions meeting customers' precise needs." Can think of worse ways to earn a living.
Can you offer
"precise solutions meeting customers' flexible needs"?
I warn you. It is a deal breaker.
Yes. Yes we can.
Mainly because we have a "global ecosystem of system integrators."
Or "an ecosystem of global system integrators" - plus of course we can meet your needs "today and tomorrow in this fast-changing world."
Shut up!
Just shut up!
You had me at "global".
Today and tomorrow?
That no use - i wanted to have my needs met by your global ecosystem of system integrators *yesterday*. And 110%.
(Incidentally, given the repeat use of 'system' in 'global ecosystem of system integrators' wouldn't 'planetary biome of system integrators' be better?)
Oooh, did you used
to work at the Echo? I'm trying to think which car park you might mean now (although I haven't lived there for over 20 years)...
Me! Me!
I write advertorials for a popular magazine. I guess that makes me a pro of sorts.
In the words of Ian Hislop
Advertorial - that cunning blend of advert and advert
Oh - sincere apologies
if "I am - It's no secret" sounded impossibly bloody pompous back there. I just meant, I've already mentioned in previous posts that's what I do.
Still doesn't pay the bills though, sadly.
I'm a professional writer turned editor
Still do the odd bit of writing for the magazines I run, but I'm too busy editing them.
I love writing, which is why I keep my own blog and spend far too much time on here.
I'm a professional amateur.
I've worked at it and dammit, I'm still no good at it.
No, I just post on here when something rattles my cage/wakes me up/when I have time/work (or life) is driving me mad.
Press Releases and Letters
Does that count?
I'm not a pro
I'm not convinced anyone could believe otherwise. They certainly wouldn't think I were a sub-editor if they could be arsed to look at all the typos that find their way into my blatherings.
I don't really care one way or another if the people who post in here are pros or not. They choose to write here because they like it, I suppose, and not because of the dangling carrot of publication.
And what could be nicer than that?
Can't you tell?
I wish I had tried harder at school, I wish I knew where commas are supposed to go, I am so greatful to speel checker and I wish I could do this for a living but as with many things in my life it's never gonna happen. This place gives me the opportunity to get a response which is one of my greatest wishes. I started a blog which was like shouting into an empty room, this blog among grown ups with their own minds and opinions who sometimes like what I wrote is a constant joy. I know in the last two years I've started too many threads but it is a drug I can't replace anywhere else.
With you all the way Dave...
...if this were a pub I'd ask what you're having (but then probably realise I didn't have enough in my pocket to stand a round!)
Right there in
your comment is exactly the reason why I post here. Mine would be a pint of the ale of the day and I would happily return the favour, but you'll never get me too a mingle cos I'm funny like that.
I was actually going to start (another) thread on whether it matters HOW a post is written or is it more about WHAT is written before this one started. Professional or amateur it don't matter to me, it's all about the vibe man.
Personally
if I'm posting I tend to spend quite a long time tinkering with it, re-reading it, editing, fact checking, spell checking and trying to write as well as I can, not because I want to show off but because I enjoy the process. I often junk things if I think it's not very interesting or I can't do the topic justice.. I'm not a pro writer, but I enjoy writing about something that interests me or something I find funny and I enjoy the mental exercise of trying to put that across as best I can and share it with the Massive. I like doing it and I find it relaxing, and it's nice to get feedback from others. Each to his own I say.
I think the vast majority of people write really well, I certainly can't tell who are the Pro's and who aren't. I'm not always interested in the topics that people raise but that's where the scroll wheel comes in handy, and I don't think it matters what style people use as long as it's polite and comprehensible and reasonably succinct...and yeah..it's just gotta have that Word vibe!
You write well Dave, I don't always agree with you, but you usually give food for thought.
When self-doubt creeps in...
...the thread goes out the window.
I often have what I initially think are brilliant ideas for interesting/insightful/witty new threads and leap onto the computer with boundless enthusiasm.
Then, halfway through composing said thread, I'm invariably struck with crushing self-doubt and the awful realisation that, nah, who in their right mind would want to read this shit?
And into the bin it goes.
It's a familiar scenario.
I, for one, would read that shit
and as someone once observed, you never really know which threads are going to fly.
Oh no... not another thread where we analyse the Blog!!!
I'm no professional. Plenty of professionals aren't very good though of course.
Here's some topical music.
well
The obvious mark of an professional writer is they get paid for their work.
Like a whore (of any determinate gender or derivitive thereof).
French or scuff, love?
In common (I suspect) with a lot of Word posters,
I have written dozens, if not hundreds of design, technical and analytical documents during my working life (mostly relating to computer systems, policy, procedure etc.).
Here's the contradiction - I am extremely verbose in my speech, but at work am concise and occasionally pedantic in my written output.
However, when it comes to music, my focus goes out of the window. I start a topic, and then all sorts of side topics filter in.
My mind often works by analogy and makes jumps. My son is the same, he has Aspergers, (maybe I do too).
When I look at the result, I often think - can anyone else make sense of that. I may be under the mistaken impression that other readers will 'get' my allusions and references.
A pro writer would (Maggoty Lamb apart) ensure that his/her audience would get the point.
Oh dear, I'm rambling - again.
I once wrote a review
of an Indian restaurant for a local magazine. So, I may be a professional raita.
That's not going to curry any favours here
.
NIce of them to tikka chance on you, though.
.
These puns just make my spirits saag.
Still, all work and no play makes us daal boys...
Aloo, Aloo
here we go again.
I'm having Naan of it.
I could tell you were a professional...
... thanks to your fine turn of jalfrezi.
I wonder if anyone will get a korma error?
.
Did you get you talent
Off your Naan?
Must have been...
...a welcome Bhuna to your ego.
I once wrote a column about Indian Breads
You know, just a couple of Paratha-graphs.
In Glasgow
that comment would be described as puri dead brilliant
You roti a column on Indian breads?
Which paper? The Daily Dosa?
I can't remember now...
...I just put a few thoughts together and poppodum on the page.
I read...
...your reviews at night. Before my head hits the pilau.
Me too
My spirits saag otherwise
Quite agree.
Makes all my troubles seem halva world away.
My gosht...
what a lot of curry puns.
It was quite a fashionable restaurant
For example, one of the starters was Chic Kebab
Just spotted
that someone else made the same pun. Sorry to be such a cheeky chapati.
yes, someone
might mutter paneer
Oh Bisto
I didn't notice, it kind of Pasandered me by
That's good
I feel much korma now about my own oversight.
Thank goodness that's settled.
All the tension was making me want to shrikhand shout.
I had an argument
with a South American gentleman in an Indian restaurant once.
It was right old Argy bhaji, too
Never a dahl moment, eh?
.
I love all these puns
They make me chuckle with ghee
Ghee?
Isn't that the show set in a high school which features singing and dhansak?
Is thatthe one that's staged
on Dopiaza ?
That's enough you lot...
You know you're trying to curry favour with the Massive but it's just not going to work. Now I've got to Goa...
Two of my friends say that I'm Ed Reardon
This is actually starting to worry me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Reardon%27s_Week
I once wrote a tiny piece for The Word
but I did not get paid. Does that make me an amateur writer or a gullible slut?
I did write a newsletter called Fresh Today in my student days. I must admit that more time was spent on puntastic headlines than the stories themselves. Like the time Clement Freud was competing against Fiona Richmond for the position of student rector at some Scottish university. You will have to ask an old person to explain the logic behind the headline: Chunky Clement Comes On Top Of Tasty Morsel. It took us hours to come up with that.
If any of you read
The new Triumph Bonneville T100 manual in Spanish I can only work with the material given to me. Please blame Triumph not the translator.
At a slight tangent
my step daughter is about to start a degree in journalism and has got her first (unpaid) contract to publish on a website. Anyone have any tips they could pass on in terms of other places that she might be able to get work published?
The best piece of advice I can pass onto her
is specialise.
Actually, I have three pieces of advice:
specialise,
specialise,
specialise.
Whatever her interest, there'll be a market for it. And she ought to aim squarely at it, long before she graduates.
In terms of other places to get work published - frankly, anywhere that pays (newspapers and magazines still take freelance submissions).
Also - really important, try and persuade her to stop writing for free. There are too many unscrupulous sites and publications out there, that consider they're doing graduates a favour. They are not. People should be paid for their work.
We all know the state of the industry right now is bad. I've been a journalist and author for over 15 years, and write little bits for a broadsheet every week, but am finding it absolutely hellish out there at the moment since being made redundant from a previous job - and am also signing on. The Recession (along with the Blogosphere and a dip in advertising) has blown huge holes in the media. Yeah, I know, boo-hoo, nobody asked us to do this job. But, seriously: we're screwed.
On the other hand, it's also the best job in the world, and is preferable to working for a living. Free sandwiches too sometimes. And a warm glass of Asti Spumante.
What I will say is, journalism, like acting, is something that's in you, regardless, that one is compelled to do, whatever the situation. If she's of that kind of mindset, she'll be okay!
I wish her the absolute best of luck, and hope any of this (apart from the negative bits!) helped.
Thanks, appreciated
.
I slightly disagree
with Stick's point about insisting on being paid. I worked for years on consumer magazines where competition for work experience places was fierce. You'd get plenty of workies who came in expecting to write the cover feature, but they were the ones who pissed people off and were never seen again. Those who made a list of how the staff liked their coffee and got friendly with the editor's PA were the ones who stayed, started writing the odd bit for the mag and even in one or two cases were taken on as writers.
Recently I helped hire a writer for a website, and by far the best applicants were those who had shown sufficient commitment to build up a decent-sized portfolio. When you're starting out the most important thing to demonstrate is that you're not a time-waster, and the only way you can really do that is by being able to produce examples of published copy -- clean and accurate published copy. If someone's willing to publish your stuff when you're an unproven writer, well, then they *are* doing you a favour.
It's also worth bearing in mind that most people doing the taking-on will have started off writing unpaid one way or another. To them enthusiasm and willingness, accuracy and punctuality are the qualities that really matter. Nail those and then maybe you get to worry about the word-rate later.
I'm slightly more with stick on this...
.....but there's got to be a quid for the pro quo. The same thing came up when I was looking at photography, and especially because of the material costs of film, paper, chemicals and so on involved (at the time). If you give anything away you've set an expectation. And even if you set a low entry price you're still making them put their money on the table.
In software low priced/no priced competitors were often derided as 'value pricing', as in how much could it be worth if it's free. But then that was Oracle, which has always charged like a wounded bull.
One professional writer
who will apparently no longer be posting here is Andrew Collins...
Andrew Collins
That's a shame. He's a good writer and a decent sort. Like everyone, he'll be irritating to someone, but I can't understand why he generates such bile.
Bucks Fizz scenario.
He couldn't stand the heat and all that.
Or, put another way, he was unable to defend his rhetorical position.
Lightweight.
Andrew has a point
there are those here who delight in posting personal abuse simply because they can.
Yeah. Right.
You can fuck off as well.
I know you're only saying that
because you secretly love me and admire my work!
Equivocator !
Get down off that fence and say what you really mean !
Andrew Collins
He wishes.
Was once a wannabe
Realised my shortcomings, having achieved "Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 2,541,962 in Books".
Now employed, as per the last eight hundred years, as a computer nerd. A not very good one that doesn't know much about computers. Actually, like a less important version of Dilbert's pointy-haired manager.
Oh, okay ... (*sigh*)
I'm a novelist. In that I've had three published, a few years ago now. One of them ("Helium" - you'd like it!) got optioned for a movie, so I moved out to Hollywood and worked on the screenplay (insert barely credible but all-too-true Tinseltown anecdotes here).
I haven't done any other paying work since, and now I'm broke. I'm still writing, though but. Had a couple of near-misses, but - rubs pipe thoughtfully against nose - the book trade isn't what it was. Now it's run by MBAs in the marketing departments. I was lucky to have a Real Publisher, one of the last, who went by gut feeling and not an eye for immediate profit.
I gave a shameless plug for Helium in another thread. It's perfectly safe for you to buy it - I won't see any royalties. You can go some way to alleviating my financial distress by making a gratifyingly large international bank transfer to my account - details on request.
I'm almost sorry to say...
...that I'll probably buy a copy of Helium. It's painfully cheap on amazon, and you're one of the Massive - what more reason to invest could anyone need? But I'm sorry to say it because clearly it will benefit you in no way! All I can say is that Erik Satie and James Joyce were pretty hard-up most of their lives and still produced ground-breaking work. Of course it would be no fun being those sort of people...
Helium
.. was Esquire (K) Magazine's book o' the month, with a blushmaking review from Steve Wright (in the afternoon). It was optioned by Warner Brothers (FX: KER-CHING!!), and went through several screenwriters (myself included), getting further and further off the plot, before David Hayman got the rights to the Lord Of The Rings and my project (amongst others) got sidebarred (FX: TOILET FLUSH). If it wasn't for the bloody Hobbits I'd be a millionaire by now, instead of just a bum, with a one-way ticket to Palookaville ...
You won't regret those few postage pennies. Unlike "Murmur", my third book which nobody liked (and fewer understood), "Helium" drew rave reviews from everyone who read it. Unfortunately, everyone who read it could hold a convention in a small family car. You might pick up "Godbox" while you're at it, if you can afford the stamp!
too harsh on yourself
From what you've written it would have to be at least a large family car...
Anyway you have done what millions of people haven't - written it, published it, optioned it, written more.
I suppose its like playing for Leyton Orient - not the fortunes of the big league, but a sure sign that you are way better than the rest of us.
Good luck with the future.
(292,857 on Amazon if I've got the right book).
This might not be the place to say that...
...I'm a serious Tolkien aficionado. Much more the books than the films, of course, but I suspect that won't much affect the insult/injury ratio...
Me too -
- and I still have my battered first paperback edition of LOTR, bought on publication. Difficult to imagine today that it was once a cult book ...
Indeed...
...I think these days there's a cult comprising the tiny amount of people who *haven't* read LOTR [...he said, fully expecting the vociferous I-hate-Tolkien members of the Massive to awaken from the slumber and express their wrath!]
I first read it in a paperback from a public library in the early 80s - the Pauline Baynes cover edition from the '70s. I bought a copy of that edition second hand a couple of years back, for the nostalgia factor. The deluxe edition (£50 or so) is actually a delight to have not just as an artefact but to read - the font and leading and acid free paper, etc, are sublime.
I'm looking forward to Verlyn Flieger's 'Green Suns On Faerie' collection of essays on Tolkien (due this month). Her previous three books, particularly 'Splintered Light' and 'A Question Of Time', are landmarks in Tolkien scholarship with a high readability aspect. Second only to the works of Tom Shippey...
For what it's worth,
I really enjoyed Helium. And I bought it and read it when you first put it out, so it must have been a people carrier at least.
'I was lucky to have a real publisher...
...one of the last, who went by gut feeling and not an eye for immediate profit.'
*Blush*
Message coming...
No. I'd love to be, but no.
I'm just a stupid sort-of-teacher who talks too much and types much as he talks (i.e. too much). I've tried to write properly - am still trying to write - but right now am stuck around 50,000 words on the first really concerted effort at a novel I've yet tried, and can't motivate myself to continue because I'm certain it's fucking shite.
But I like posting here. You lot are decent, and mostly you don't tell me to shut up even when I richly deserve it. Ta.
Bob.
Shut up.
Yeah.
Good idea.
If it's any consolation, Bob ...
... I'm sure your novel is fucking shite, too.
Thanks.
a modest proposal
I don't suppose you can finish it by saying "to be continued in part 2 of 17"? Seems to be very popular approach these days.
On that topic, obviously where Burt went wrong was by calling his first novel Helium, and not Hydrogen. To be followed by Helium. Then Lithium, Beryllium etc. Instant series (which also seem to be very popular these days).
True dat.
But beginning with "Helium" does leave open the sequence "Neon" (the sordid demise of a good country girl who came to the big city looking for fame), "Argon": (a contemporary re-imagining of the story of Jason and The Argonauts), "Krypton": (the tale of Marlon Brando's tempestuous stewardship during the planet's last days), "Xenon": (..er it's about how annoying the lights on other people's cars are..). *gives up*
Good idea.
Go for it.
It's much better to be a (preferably young) first-time novelist than one with a track record of poor sellers. Sales figures are all held on a database, and the first thing the marketing department does is find out how much revenue they can expect. Doesn't matter AT ALL how good your reviews are, how well you can write. This is the brutal truth. I spent two years writing a 600-page thriller that everyone loved (my agent said it was like discovering a "new Le Carré"), and every publisher looked at my sales figures and didn't want to take the risk. My "reviews" included "couldn't put it down" and, terribly, "writes too well for the genre", which gives you some indication of the pitiful state publishing's in. Nobody's prepared to attach their name (and therefore career) to something that's a risk in terms of sales, and everything's decided by group consensus, led by the marketing department, a bunch that (usually) prides itself on never reading books. Unless the sales team can see *exactly* what page of the next catalogue you'll be on - which two writers you'll sit between - they can't sell it in. If it's a "cross between Dan Brown and Nick Hornby" (whatever), it's something they can get behind. If they have to struggle to describe it (even I have difficulty describing Murmur), then it does, not, stand, a, chance.
So to all wannabee writers out there - be encouraged by the fact that nobody's heard of you, but bear in mind even if you're published, it means nothing unless your publisher makes a profit. If it just gets great reviews, then that's all you're going to get out of it. Time was when publishers took the long view and nurtured talent, but those days are gone, probably never to return.
On a brighter note, it seems I have a deal for the last novel I wrote. In terms of up-front money, it's almost derisory, but I don't write for the money. I write because I still believe I can write. And I enjoy it. And I have the time for it. Also, the first three are likely to be e-published. Both these deals are being thrashed out by my agent, who's worked her butt off for me without getting a cent out of it for four years now. So another bit of advice - don't even think about "getting a publisher". Get an agent.
I get the model, but I also know how knackered the
publishing industry is, suffering like the music industry (family connections in the biz). But my (largely uninformed and ignorant question) is : doesn't the Amazon Kindle channel offer a way out, going direct and removing the need for the printing bit ? Why not go paperless, like dream offices and 3rd world toilets ?
E-publishing ...
... is clearly on the way to replacing the paper book publishing business. As I said, it looks like my novels will be picked up by a publisher (an established print publisher) specifically for this market. There is no "advance" to speak of, but the royalties are far more generous. E-books are available printed-on-demand, so the paper book will never go away. The reason for still wanting a publisher is that they offer publicity and a business framework. Putting your own work out on the internet is do-able, and some have made a great success of it independently of the publishing business. In the same way that a few people have done very well out of self-publishing paper books. There will always be the publishing business in some form or other, but the medium is changing, perhaps faster than I can. I've always surrounded myself with books (they seem to silt up around me if I stay still long enough), and loved them for their own sake.
I've got one of those portable reading devices - it's amazing - you can carry it in your pocket, read it wherever you like, and it uses no power! It's called a "book".
"self-publishing paper books"
It's curious, isn't it, that - in spite of virtually all music releases being now essentially self-published (in a noble 'indie' tradition going right back to Joe Meek in the 60s, if not before) - the idea of self-publishing in the books world still has a kind of stigma attached to it?
Do you, Kokemeister, or the Massive in general feel that this snobbery/credibility issue will go away any time soon?
Group hug!
... not you, Bob ...
Ok.
Mostly decent.
Hey
the lady said can it, buddy!
Okay...
...I'll fess up: I'm a professional writer, although as Stick (above) notes, it's almost impossible to make a living from writing. Until recently, I supplemented the writing with teaching in two highly rated universities but I guess everyone has heard about the cuts in HE - one contract is okay, while the other has been terminated and like Stick, I'm signing on (hence the other thread regarding having to sell a beautiful guitar). I'd agree with Burt, too - good publishers are essential but hard to find. Mine - American - still has fact checkers and proof readers. Many don't and mine has cut its rates to the bone recently and my latest - still being researched - is being paid at half what I got for the last book.
I'd guide you toward Amazon but I got paid a flat rate. I wouldn't give it up, though: the moment when I saw the first book on Amazon was utterly wonderful
loads of books, no money
My mate Stuart writes business books on purchasing. He must have 20 books in print and on Amazon (and one on Kindle). He says he gets enough royalties each year to pay for Christmas lunch. He might be exaggerating, but certainly it is not a lot. A tough way to make a living. (OK for him because he is primarily a trainer and the books raise his profile and credibility).
The reviews were great and 11 years later...
...I got my first royalty cheque: £37 and a few pence.
Be in no doubt: if you read a load of good reviews on something, it's still unlikely the author's making any money.
I'm all for writing, for the reasons stated by Burt K and more besides, but frankly who can be bothered with the publishing industry? I can still recall an author event at the Edinburgh Book Festival 11 years ago which was hugely attended and went sensationally well. Alas, the publisher's representative - a posh girl with a silly name (they all seem to be) - hadn't bothered coming to it. Sooner or later a better model for publishing/e-publishing will bed in and the need for these 92.5% guys will ebb away. There still won't be many sales, but there'll be a whole lot less frustration.
Oh, and I forgot
Whaddya mean, Drakey - can't spell for toffphey? (Inserts smiley face...)
I think awards ceremonies
should be done online yearly, say Christmas with a big lead up and fanfare, and in the style of the person nominated by the group to dish them out that year. And rather like the name 'massive', as I understand done to be not 'cool' and exclusive, awards should have a 'blogger of the year' award that the winner is entitled to put as a signature on all their posts.
I say they're fun. Just don't do 'em in the name of the mag or by committee so as to avoid democratic debate and hard feelings.
Over the last 14 years...
... I have written bits of many, many guidebooks. In 2009/10 I finally got the chance to write the whole of a guidebook that was duly published last Oct and distributed via Waterstone's/Amazon etc. The publisher nearly went bust in autumn '10, I was scared I wouldn't get the last 50% of the flat fee (no royalties obviously) and now the publication is sitting at 247,733 on Amazon where it got two reviews from buyers. Choice quotes included, "This sad little book was not an asset on our holiday", "the literary style was tired and depressing" and "I'm afraid that I found this the least helpful guide I have ever bought..."
Two sales, yay!