Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Played it for a month

Anselm's picture

I'm in trouble with both the missus and 12-year old son, not so much about the music I listen to at home, but more about the way I choose to listen to it. Anyone else find this?

I have a habit of digging out a much-loved album from the depths of my music collection, then proceeding to play it non-stop around the house for an entire month before I get bored with it. It is duly returned to the CD pile from whence it came, to remain unplayed for the next five years or so, or until the whim takes me to pick the same one again. Am currently coming to the end of a month of Yes' 90125, much to the annoyance of said family members.

When I say "round the house", I mean the house stereo, bedside ipod dock, the kitchen, everywhere. There is no escape. Apparently I have the irritating habit of walking into a room, switching music on, walking out and forgetting I've left it on, sometimes for hours. Doesn't go down so well with the kid or the GLW. But if they dare turn it off, yours truly charges in and claims "I was listening to that!"...

Thoughts?

0

Do the same

it's totally normal, ignore the squares, and don't sweat it.

2
Slick | 2 August 2011 - 1:40pm

Music or the telly

I am incapable of entering a room without turning on some media delivery device.

Boiling the kettle? - clearly the task of making a cuppa - 3/4 minutes, requires an elpee being played in the dining room.

Enter bedroom, turn on telly, get whatever I needed, exit bedroom, leave telly on.

Wandering around the house listening to podcasts gets me shouted at. I cut the grass twice each weekend just for that permissible listening time.

1
latenitetellyvision | 2 August 2011 - 2:29pm

This is going to be controversial but

have you ever tried asking, "Does anyone mind if I play...?" It gives you a few clues as to whether what you're about to play would be well, badly or indifferently received and you can then consider retiring to another room or ploughing ahead anyway. (File under: "Getting along together.") :-)

2
Mark JF | 2 August 2011 - 2:43pm

That's a bit

radical.

How will the squares ever benefit from a musical education that way ?

0
Slick | 2 August 2011 - 3:45pm

If I said that...

...in our house, I'd never get to listen to anything.

2
ainsley009 | 2 August 2011 - 3:53pm

In this 'random' age.....

.....I like the idea of just angling in on one LP/CD for an extended amount of time.
I've slightly extended the concept at the moment to only listening to the four VU records so, English cricket wins aside, you can imagine it's a barrel of laughs round here just now.

0
ranger | 2 August 2011 - 2:52pm

I've been like that

This year there have been a few albums that have been tested almost to destruction chez Rosbif. The Mummers' mini-album Mink Hollow Road album was one such, and is top of my most-played list; the Pierces were next for the treatment, but have since been overtaken by Julia Johnson, whose album (I Am Not The Night, as some of you will already be wearily aware...) I've played a huge amount, and still can't get enough of.

The new Gemma Hayes is going to get the treatment next. Ah, to spend quality time in her company...

0
Rosbif | 2 August 2011 - 3:05pm

I think there are two types of music lovers ..

.. those for whom music is a welcoming background noise, a kind of wallpaper. And those who take music seriously enough that they think it should be given the respect of being absorbed with full attention. The latter type of person gets very irritated with the former, for using music in a "thump thump, distract me at all costs" type of way.

I think silence and peace is also a valuable thing.

0
Marky | 2 August 2011 - 3:29pm

Yes..

...I love music and have it on all the time. However, I cannot listen to the same thing time & again.

If you live with other people, you simply can't put the same thing on over & over.

I would KILL someone who listened to one thing a month in every room in the house. This may sound harsh, but I think you are being incredibly selfish. If you have to hear the same thing again and again, buy some headphones.

5
JoLean | 2 August 2011 - 3:33pm

I'm with you

on this one but daren't risk an 'up'.

0
happy harry | 2 August 2011 - 4:03pm

Oops

almost a double 'up'.

0
happy harry | 2 August 2011 - 4:04pm

Absolutely

Spot on.

0
Red Umpire | 2 August 2011 - 4:18pm

Have to agree

hearing the same album over and over for a month would drive me nuts.
I'm the opposite, I put something on and want to change it after three tracks...possibly equally annoying. I do tend to have radio silence on quite often as well though....

0
Dr Volume | 2 August 2011 - 4:40pm

Wholeheartedly Agree

And this is why I live a hermit-like existence.

I can play German Overalls on repeat as often as I wish, which is probably the epitome of selfishness...or madness...

0
James EB | 2 August 2011 - 6:24pm

Yes...

This is why that nice Japanese man invented the Walkman - so one can listen to music anywhere (and not bother anyone else with it). His original vision was to have the workers toiling in the paddy fields listening to the music of their choice to help alleviate the boredom of tending rice. Sweep forwards to the iPod age and the personal music concept is still the same. I am frequently reminded by Lady OF to use my expensive headphones from time to time! This is why she is designated the FPO (for our newer readers: Fun Prevention Officer).

0
Baskerville Old Face | 2 August 2011 - 5:11pm

I'm sorry....

....people with....erm....Walkmen....don't bother anyone else?
In East London, such contraptions have at the very least a 90% annoyance factor but if it's 0% where you live.......

0
ranger | 2 August 2011 - 6:27pm

Shit Earphones

The supplied iPod earphones are awful. For starters, the leakage is very high, which means half the sound isn't getting into your ears but radiating out into your surroundings. Added to that the noise-cancelling is poor, so extraneous noise gets past the earphones to your ears far too easily. Result: people turn the volume up to hear better over the external noise, causing noise pollution to everyone else nearby. Remedy: bin the supplied earphones and spend some money on a good set of in-ear phones, such as the excellent sonically-efficient Etymotic ER6i and you'll be able to turn the volume down and hear the music / podcast without extraneous noise and without annoying anyone else.

Just picture yourself listening to this heading home on the up Northern Line escalator at King's Cross in the rush hour, all extraneous hubbub banished... Bliss!

0
Mike_H | 2 August 2011 - 7:30pm

Thoughts?

Oh yes. Not least, forcing two innocent people to listen to Yes for a month is practically as bad as waterboarding.

0
mikethep | 2 August 2011 - 6:13pm

Playing 90125

For a month is much worse than waterboarding !!

0
Excitable Boy | 2 August 2011 - 6:53pm

Yep! Me, too

although I can get like that with single tracks, let alone albums. I do find myself punching repeat on songs and indulging myself in seriously forensic listening - did I hear that bassline right? What was that sound at 2.57? Etc.

And to echo some of the above posts, this is why I do an awful lot of listening on headphones.

If I tried to play some of the stuff I listen to aloud on repeat chez nous, then Mrs Specs_Beard would take my iPod, insert it in one end of my anatomy and no doubt remove it via the other.

0
Specs_Beard | 2 August 2011 - 8:47pm

Elliott Smith

He had this approach and would play only one album for several months at a time.

0
clivetemple | 2 August 2011 - 8:57pm

I love silence more than I love music...

but I love music.

0
Patrick Crowther | 3 August 2011 - 8:05am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd