Entertainment For Lively Minds
Oh, what's the point..?
I must point out at this early juncture that this is not a suicide thread!
And I know that we all get these days but I must say mine are becoming increasingly frequent. By this I mean days when everything is a right old effort. I plough my way into work which takes me a ridiculous two & a half hours to wade my way through a job I dislike. By the time I get back there's hardly any time to see my kids before their bedtime and I find that I'm too tired to do the things I actually enjoy doing.
There's an increasing ball of frustration building up that I can't find a way of actually achieving a satisfying existence. Don't get me wrong I love my family, that's the part that is rather wonderful but I've got books I want to read, music to listen to (a whole album, in one go, all the way through...oh the luxury!), take up painting again, sort the garage out. Okay, the last one can wait but I think you get the idea.
I feel there's a persistent barrier that I can't break down. I'm sure it's just a passing phase but it's a bloody long one.
There, that's better. Breathe...
As you were. Ignore the ageing fool in the corner.
- More from bamthwok.
- Login or register to post comments










I know how you feel.
The daily grind can get a bit much, and that's a genuine bastard of a commute you've got there.
If it helps, the FPO and I spent the weekend sorting out our girls' room. This involved chucking out the little 'un's toddler bed and moving her into the bottom bunk, building and painting some rather nice (and extremely cheap) solid pine chests of drawers from IKEA, moving some stuff around and generally sorting shit out. It was MASSIVELY therapeutic - actually getting something done. Sometimes I feel that my working life consists largely of starting things and then getting frustrated that they will never, ever finish. It was nice to finish something. Nice to have one room in our house that's not a complete fucking tip, too.
Now we're going to do the kitchen. I'm painting all the cupboards, ripping up the floor, laying underfloor heating and stone tiles, fitting a cheap-as-yer-like solid oak worktop and new sink. That's my half term sorted, right there.
Doing stuff. Finishing stuff. That's the one.
Work...
The wife and I cleaned out the attic at the weekend.
Filthy, dirty, covered in cobwebs.
Still, she's good with the kids!
(courtesy of Tommy Cooper)
There aren't enough hours in the day
and that's something I'm finding with increasing regularity. In fact, I'd be surprised if anyone said they always find time to do what they want to do.
Word of advice though, your commute sounds horrendous and if you dislike your job that much, do something about it. Easier said than done maybe (perhaps take some time off to do some proper job hunting if that's possible?), but that's more important than all the books, music, garages etc. in the world.
You spend a huge amount of your life at work. It's not worth doing something you hate. Life's too short
" It's not worth doing something you hate..."
...you're not wrong there. But I'd say the idea that "life's too short" IS wrong - it's too bloody long. The sooner it's over with the better. (No, not a suicide thread either - just a realisation that, to my mind, the game will never really be worth the candle.)
Don't get all existentialist on us now
You'll end up thinking like this:
"Man can will nothing unless he has first understood that he must count on no one but himself; that he is alone, abandoned on earth in the midst of his infinite responsibilities, without help, with no other aim than the one he sets himself, with no other destiny than the one he forges for himself on this earth.
N-Dubz?
...
In one!
gosh you ARE well-read
Ha ha ha ha ha!
Dear Mr Bervie, Please accept this humble up button in thanks for this response.
...and one
for you too, Mr Bob
Ta
but Mr Bervie deserves all the plaudits for that one.
No job is worth that commute.
No offense mate but two and a half hours? That's as long as the train journey from Glasgow to Newcastle. If you can't change your job then you badly need to move house. Work out which of the two is most doable then take action. If I did that I'd have gone postal years ago.
Job+Mortgage+Marriage+Kids=No more albums all the way through
I keep wondering this myself, how come in this age of convenience, technology and time saving gadgetry - why I seem to have so little time to relax nowadays? How come before the internet, before computers, I had time to go to gigs, go to the pub, write letters, write songs, go to gigs, perform gigs, go the pub, run a cassette label and fanzine, read books and listen to whole albums right the way through...and still have time to go the pub?
Then I realise that when I was doing all this I was on the dole and living at my mum and dad's...
Feel your pain
I commute to London from the West Country. I do 2 and a half hours door to door, two times a day. I have a 15 month old son who eats dinner with us when I get through the door then gets bathed and put to bed. He's not a keen sleeper so sometimes it's nearly ten o'clock when I sit down with the wife to watch some TV, drink a cup of tea and then it's time to bed to get up at 5am the next morning to start it all over again.
Weekends are no better thanks to the close proximity of my son's three grandparents. Unless of course we plan to fill our days so that we're not at home.
The commute allows me to listen to music, read books and write a blog. But I don't really get much time to do much else.
ganglesprocket, I don't know about bamthwok's reason for the long commute, but in my case the need for the wife to be nearer to her family following a difficult pregnancy and my job being specific to London meant somebody had to sacrifice something. Either the inlaws came to live with us or we went to live nearer to them. I can cope with a commute if it means I don't live with the in-laws. Bad enough having them within half an hours drive......
Flipside
I'd kill to have grandparents living nearby! Oh, the babysitting possibilities.
Babysitting...
Yeah, if my boy liked going to sleep. Only the wife and me can get him to sleep. So there's no need for babysitting unless we are going out in the afternoon so we can get home to put him to bed. Or putting him to bed and then going out. Which would mean about 9-10pm at night.....
Sleep
You may not want to hear this, but you REALLY need to sort that out.
Unless there are other problems which (naturally) you don't wish to share on here, you need to ensure that he goes to sleep without Mummy or Daddy soon, or it'll cause untold problems. Truly, work it out.
Sorry if you think this is sticking my nose in further than necessary/wanted.
If I may, I'll stick my nose i too
We struggled with getting our older daughter to go to sleep but it was a big step once we had gone through controlled crying to get her to go to sleep on her own. Very worthwhile. If we had let her, she would still have one of us holding her hand and singing her to sleep. She's 12 now.
I'm certainly not condemning him.
But he's plainly frayed to bits and on the evidence of his post he can either change jobs or move house. More than that I can't say or comment on.
If the epic commute works for you then genuinely more power to you. If I spent that long a day (5 hours? You're only meant to work four hours at a time) commuting I'd go completely mad myself.
Personally I'd live with the inlaws. I like my mother in law and if I had a child she'd come in blooming useful. I'd certainly not spend 25 hours a week on a train. I just couldn't.
My story
Hello, 2 year old and a six month old under our roof. Living in London, from Dublin originally and no grandparents/family living nearby. I hear what you're saying.
You can find the time, sometimes, but it takes planning. And the frustration arises from having to plan what you used to do spontaneously. I used to go to about a gig a week - not so anymore, but I did get to go to Glasto for three days thanks to a very generous MrsDrJ. So I got a year of gigs in a weekend. Fair nuff. I've developed a metaphorical camel's hump for the things I like, so that when I get to do them, it sustains me through the times when I can't get to do them.
Also this year, having hit my mid-thirties I was developing a BMI to equal my age so I finally bit the bullet to get in some kind of fitness. Since May, I've been jogging 2-3 mornings per week and loving it. I usually get up at 5.30 to do it and I can listen to music. Takes planning and effort but it's become very worthwhile for me. If you had told me last year that I'd be doing it I'd have told you I didn't have the time.
I use my commute (45 mins) to take in a book or music or a podcast - can you utilise any of your commute this way? To be honest, the biggest enemy of listening to new music is the enjoyment I get from podcasts: The Word, This American Life, Chris Moyles...
But I do like my job, that is important for sanity.
Empathise
Could have written quite a lot of that myself
I also have a bastard commute,1&3/4 hours each way if I am really lucky
Its a hell of an amount of time and it leaves me quite often coming home drained and grumpy, to go to bed and then start again. You then get to the weekend, want to collapse on the sofa before the treadmill calls again. The light in the darkness is the family supported by grazing over popular culture and gadgets. I often feel inadequate when I read of the Massive members having read X & Y tomes - my brain is too tired to do anything but surf and watch trashy TV with the family. I don't feel that I am achieving anything else - and hence I do think idiotbear's advice is very sage - make the gargantuan effort to do SOMETHING.
Draw up a "To Don't" list.
There's so much stuff we're expected to do, required to do and generally drawn into. Well, have a think about all those tasks and duties, think about the ones you can stop doing, make a "to don't" list and then just don't do them. Hopefully, you'll clear some space to do the things that do matter to you.
Three and Three Quarter Hours per day
for me, everyday for the last 12 twelve years! I leave at 6.15 and usually get home at 6.30/7pm, in time to drag my daughter away from Mylie Cyrus etc, put her in the bath and read her a story.I like my job, usually get on with colleagues and have got used to the drive. The only time I find it really frustrating is when I actually think of all the other things I could be doing if I worked closer to home i.e. trying to lessen the ever increasing ring that used to be a six pack, practicing more on the guitar or spending more time with the little'un.
Other than that I use the commute as ME time, I switch the phone off so can't be contacted and I listen to podcasts. Now the issue is that there are too many podcasts and not enough time to listen to all the music I've recently bought!
Petrol prices are really starting to bite now though, it's costing nearly £90 a week.
Sometimes I think I must be the only one to do stupid commutes so it's nice to know I'm not alone.
Modern Life Is Rubbish?
My commute is a reasonable 1hr 15 mins (although I know some will gasp at even that!) However, my *real* problem, was exercise and find the time to do some...
I can read on the train, and telly is only ever about a couple of hours a night..and has been since the youngest came along 10 yrs ago. BUT finding time to do exercise - to make me feel better, and it DOES release the endorphins, genuinely making me feel good - was a struggle.
Thanks to the tube strike (bizarre, but true) I decided to walk from London Bridge to Camden town and have now been doing it every day, approx 4 miles in about 55 mins, working up a bit of a lather, and I'm expecting to keep doing it, as it is only 15 mins longer than 'normal' and I arrive at the office feeling great (luckily we have a shower, not a good one, but it's there...)
*IF* you can fit in some exercise, it'll really help. A couple of years ago, I had a few problems, and the medication helped but long term the quack said exercise WILL be the thing that keeps your mood bright, and I have to say on the evidence of the last week, that has been true...
The Trap for 21st C Man (UK)
Achieve certain level of success (= certain level of income)
+
Conventional marriage & kids (ie arriving between 30-45, during career peak)
+
Desire to live in family house & good schools (= move out of City)
+
Wife's career affected or extra childcare costs = lower family income
=
Main breadwinner needs to stay in job whether an unacceptable distance or/and unfulfilling.
=
The Trap.
It isn't for everyone...
... but when my wife and I were in similar situation to yours, we decided to up sticks and leave the country. We were in our late 20s. Our commutes were only an hour each way, but involved packed trains, buses and long walks. We both disliked our jobs with slightly different degrees of intensity. Our daughter was only 6 months old, but we simply decided that we didn't want to spend the next 40 years living that life.
So, we decided to look for jobs abroad. My job is fairly specialised, as are my qualifications, but I managed to find a job in the Caribbean, where we have been for 3 years. Don't regret the move at all. We have a much higher quality of life - shorter commutes, better weather, more time together as a family.
who, exactly.....
is that NOT for?
Sounds like a top plan. Jealous. My Mrs would up sticks to Sweden in a flash. She's never been, or met anyone swedish, just has a thing about it...
State controlled alcohol alert...
if you like your booze, I'd have a serious think about it first.
Music's good though...
Comment in Saturday's Guardian:
related to the Scottish Government's consideration of minimum alcohol prices and/or increased taxation, and how this strategy is supposedly backed up Scandinavian statistics showing how alcohol consumption has fallen as a result.
The writer pointed out that Scandinavians (actually Norwegians, but I don't doubt the Swedes are much different) have simply perfected the art of making hooch, and there's just as much consumption (if not more) than ever: doesn't show up in Government statistics though!
Makes me proud to be (quarter) Norwegian ...
Damn! Should have asked Sid to bring some hooch
over for last Friday's get-together then...
The Swede I knew...
...said that they would just pop across to Denmark on the ferry for all their booze.
Go for it!
Some people have family commitments which make it difficult to move, so I sympathize with them. But everyone else should give it a go! We're moving to Sarajevo next, which will be interesting.
What about...
I agree with the people who say that exercise helps, I'm always trying but failing, and I know it will help if I can do it. But more important still is to exercise your soul, something I have done. Of course the majority of the massive have probably long since jettisoned the belief that there is a creator to whom we are all intended to relate, and who if he existed would transform us from the inside out. So we plod on, hoping that family, music and gadgets will provide the answer, and accept the received wisdom that there is no God, but still feel the hole is there that bamthwok has identified, with nothing to fill it.
Bummer, huh?
Well...
...I for one don't feel a "hole" at all. I just wish I had a bit more time for the stuff I love doing. It's not an existential crisis.
Interesting angle
As an atheist who was previously very religious for around 25 years, I can see both where you're coming from and also where (IMHO) you're going wrong.
Belief in God certainly does provide a sense of purpose, a meaning to life, a goal to always reach towards. It really does. But (and it's a big but) that sense is with you whether or not the god you believe in is real or not: it's the belief in (not the reality of) an eternal after-life and supreme being which helps to keep you going.
The problem is that you're in danger of doing some daft or harmful things, or missing out on some good things, in your perceived road to Him. Replace Him with something real and genuinely attainable and you can have the same feeling. It's more difficult (because as we all know, real life is messy and blurred), but it's also more real.
Just a thought.
Two points
There is no received wisdom that there is no god. I came to that conclusion all by myself after thinking about if for a long time.
I don't feel there is any hole in my life. What I do enjoy is not living with that old Catholic guilt that was laid on me for so many years.
Bummer? Not in the least.
Just trying to stir some comment
I don't like telling people what to think, but I am a christian and I get frustrated by the lack even of interest in the subject these days! I honestly think we all have a need to relate to a God who to me is much more likely to exist than not, all things considered. Let's face it it's a matter of faith because none of us can prove it one way or the other. My experience is that He's real.
I'm fascinated by this notion of Catholic guilt...
I say this as an Irishman who had a Catholic education (nuns/brothers/priests) from age 4 to 18 and I'm still at a loss about it? Did i really snooze through ALL those religion classes that - not only do I not have Catholic guilt but - I spent quite some time thinking it was something that existed only in Scorcese movies, although if pushed, I'd be hard pushed to point it out!
Is it one of those things that we didn't get over here?
School is only part of it
With my upbringing, attendance at Mass on Sundays and other Holy Days of Obligation was compulsory and non-negotiable. This was only the beginning as a whole raft of other obligations needed to be observed.
If these were not observed, or you showed reluctance - you are not only disappointing your parents but you are disappointing Our Lord - who sacrificed his life to save you.
From the age of 7, the First Holy Communion gives you your first opportunity to officially confess your sins! Woo hoo! I remember making these up because I really could not think of anything that bad.
The whole Catholic faith hinges on the fact that we are all sinners. Being a sinner, confessing your sins and knowing that He died on the cross to save us from our sins. Wash away my iniquity and cleanse me from my sin, says the priest.
It is heavy stuff when piled on relentlessly throughout childhood by home and school. Particularly when you decide to step away from it. I haven't told my parents I am not practicing. They sort of know but I haven't had the heart to be so brutal as to tell them that I fundamentally do not believe the things they brought me up to believe. I'm 44 and I have 5 kids.
The good side is that forgiveness and humility is drilled into most Catholics and I think the world could do with a lot more of that.
But the guilt - yes it is there, and for all the reasons expressed above.
Catholicism
Good to see one aspect of catholicism has rubbed off.
It sounds like it
I can still remember the run up to my first Easter as a primary school pupil.
We were told about the agony in the garden. We were told how Jesus sweated blood. We were told how every sin ever committed passed through his head. We were told that every sin WE had ever committed went through his mind. Oh yes, we made Jesus suffer and sweat blood. And this was only the start at age 5 or 6.
If something like that wouldn't make you feel guilty, you must be pretty bulletproof. If your schools didn't lay this sort of crap on you, you were very lucky.
Catholic guilt
Here too...
Mind you, once I decided it was all a load of old toss, and stopped going to mass, I felt the weight lift off my shoulders....
No point
I was not brought up in a religious household, we never went to church and religion was never discussed. I remember being asked what religion I was on my first day at senior school and I had no idea - I didn't even know what my options were!
Once we started to do proper RE lessons at school I soon realised that it was all a little bit odd (this wasn't multicultural stuff but lessons that seemed to based on the premise that everything in the bible is fact!). As a result I suppose that I've considered myself to be an atheist since I was about 12. I presume that it's as a result of that background that I don't have a hole in my life. Does there need to me a point in everything? I don't think so.
But
If God exists - 50/50 yes or no so it's very possible - is it not worth looking into the possibility that if it is true you need to act on it? Religion is something which has been created to fulfil the need to do something to reach a mistaken idea of what or who God is, and catholic guilt is one of the depressing spin offs of religion, as is boring ritual, forcing people to believe stuff that they don't, and trying to maintain that religious people are somehow a cut above everyone else. This is all rubbish and in total opposition to what Jesus was all about. If you actually look at what he said and did it's all a million miles from 'religion' and much more about fullness of life and freedom from guilt and not about power and control; that's a man made aberration.
Sorry...
...but it's not 50/50. The balance of probability hinges on the amount of evidence available for each hypothesis, at which point the purely philosophical yes/no, 50/50 question becomes something a bit more pragmatic.
As (sigh) Dawkins would say, 100% atheism is as logically untenable as 100% faith. The strongest atheists (that would be him, with me hot on his heels) are actually just at the upper end of the agnosticism scale, if they're honest - which he is, and which I try to be. Clearly we can't KNOW either way (except through a verified, unequivocal divine revelation, which would be the only thing capable of settling the matter utterly), but I'm persuaded enough by the evidence against the God hypothesis and the absence of evidence for, that he almost certainly ain't there. So I work on the basis that he's not, and Pascal can wager all he likes.
But that's enough from me. I'm very glad you derive comfort and meaning from your faith, genuinely I am. I hope you continue to do so. But my atheism (oh, alright, strongly atheist-tending agnosticism) isn't an absence: it's the cornerstone of en entire view of the universe which I find beautiful and enriching.
The trouble is
It's how you interpret the evidence available isn't it? There are plenty of highly intelligent scientists (I'm not one) who find the evidence for compelling. And either God exists or he doesn't, so in the end 'I don't know' doesnt help. It's not really about whether or not I derive comfort from faith, it's whether it's true that's the question that needs to be answered. I couldn't rest until I found the answer to that. Must admit though if you ask those who have stayed true to what Jesus taught and not what the religious hierarchy often (but not always) get away with, they will put comfort a long way down the list - witness Jesus' own experience. What is good is that we can talk about it openly - not the case everywhere, there are more people being persecuted for their faith now than there ever were.
OK, apparently I'm not done.
Sure, there are religious scientists, and good luck to them. I don't know quite how that works, but it seems to work for them. Generally, when I've heard them discuss the difficulty of reconciling the two approaches to thinking about the universe, it's been "oh, well, faith and science are two different things and explain different phenomena". That's fine - you know, whatever floats your boat. I'd struggle, I think, to devote my life to the cause of evidence-based scientific enquiry while reserving a little pocket of my brain for faith. To me, faith and evidence are close to mutually exclusive.
I'm definitely not an evangelical atheist. I'd prefer that everyone could think like me, but then, wouldn't we all? There will always be religious people, and I'm 100% fine with it as long as it doesn't hurt anyone. I get uppity when it *does*, but otherwise I'm fully "live and let live". I'm genuinely happy for people if they find faith to be a comforting way of understanding the world. I just have a bit of a faith allergy - it seems like the world's most overrated virtue. But I bet it's nice to have it.
Hmmm
You're thrashing me on the up arrows anyway...
Have one from me
For the calm and polite manner in which you express your view.
And from me too.
Is this the only place on t'internet where this conversation can be had without rancour on either side?
Possibly
I was into Buddhism for a bit. Meditation made me very peaceful and better able to negotiate lifes ups and downs, so I can see how faith and prayer, away from the dogma and hate of the extremists, can be good for us.
Having said that, I came to the eventual conclusion that the benefits of meditation, though very real, are physiological in nature. I'd nopw describe myself as an agnostic leaning towards atheism.
Hallelujah!
Try Ship of Fools...
I hope not
I would like to think that it's not but I have my doubts. I'm not sure why the subject normally raises such hackles. If someone believes in something strongly enough, I don't know why they have a problem with someone sees the world differently.
It depends on how the beliefs of one
are forced onto the other. See the Texas Textbook debacle over here for an example, though there are countless others.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/education/13texas.html
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/05/21/texas-cooks-the-textbooks.html
To answer your question
Set aside the question of whether or not god exists; I simply, genuinely don't care. I don't believe in god (or God, if you prefer), and if asked will generally tick the boax marked "atheist." If there is a god, he/she/it shouldn't give a toss whether I believe in him/her/it. How I live my life matters more, and that goes for every single human being on this planet.
I like what you say about the disconnect between faith and religion. It's vast, isn't it?
Really?
"If there is a god, he/she/it shouldn't give a toss whether I believe in him/her/it."
But what if he/she/it did give a toss? What then?
You're placing your own constraints on what God should or shouldn't be, but God might not conform at all to what you think. Why, if there's no God and therefore no ultimate purpose to all of it, does it matter how you live your life? Where did you get that idea from?
Polite disagreement attempted
Are you seriously asking me why it would matter to me how I live my life without my believing in god? If you are, then, I'm sorry, that's such a ludicrous question that I'm not going to bother answering it. And where, exactly, did I say there is "no ultimate purpose to it all"?
It's quite straightforward
It matters to me how I live my life and it matters to those I come into contact with how I live my life. Similarly it matters to me how people that I come into contact with live their lives (obviously to varying degrees). I have morals that hopefully allow me to rub along well with most others. I'm not sure how any of that has anything to do with any god.
So
What is the purpose to it all?
None
Well, as far as I'm concerned, there isn't any purpose. I don't have any sort of a problem with that although I fully understand that other people do. I simply can't see why there needs to be a purpose and as I'm quite content with that view I don't see the point in considering alternatives.
This.
I only have to think about what life is for the overwhelming majority of animals, and remember that we are no more or less special than the average gazelle or cockroach or lion. We're lucky in the extreme that we've evolved past the point where life isn't necessarily just a constant cycle of dealing with terror, cold and hunger.
So yeah. There's no PURPOSE. Life isn't FOR anything, except to try and live as well as possible, materially, ethically and interpersonally. That'll do me - I've got about 50 years tops left on the planet, and then I'm done. Might as well try to be good and have some fun.
So
Is the whole shebang purely a coincidence? In which case where do the moral imperatives we all seem to instinctively feel come from? *Why* must we live as well as possible? If we are all a collision of atoms, why does it matter how we behave? I think the Stephen Hawking model, which is basically that there is no need for a mind behind the universe, is fatally flawed because how could something so beautiful and enriching emerge by chance from nothing? If you look at, say, a Monet, you think 'what was the person like who made this?' But are you saying that when you look at a flower you think 'how amazing this beautiful thing emerged by chance?' I find this hard to reconcile!
Some answers
I don't think our morals are instinctive at all but learnt from being a member of whatever society and culture we take our influences from. My morals are different from other people in this country let alone from another culture or time.
Living "as well as possible" is a purely personal judgement and again would mean different things to different cultures and also depends upon the means at our disposal. The reason it matters how we behave is that a large number of our actions impinges on the lives of others who don't have a choice how we behave.
I don't think I've ever looked at a painting or a flower in the way you describe.
By chance.
Understandable but wrong interpretation of evolution there, JH.
Sure, the individual mutations happen "by chance", but their role in speciation is anything *but* chance. If an advantageous adaptation (better fins, sharper teeth, longer neck) appears, the animal with it is far more likely to survive to reproduce than another animal that doesn't. If you're a fish and you're born with slightly mutated, more efficient fins, those better-shaped fins help you escape predators more than the average. That means you and your descendants are going to get to pass on your genes than the next fish. Over evolutionary timescales, that solidifies into new species.
And we're talking evolution over MILLIONS of years here. It's hard to get our heads around the timescales, but if you bear in mind that these adaptations arise over millions of generations, and that they're TINY incremental changes which slowly intensify through natural selection over the millenia, it stops looking anything *like* chance.
The other thing to remember about evolution is that it's not *going* anywhere. It's tempting for us to think of humanity, or sharks, or orchids, as the *pinnacle* of their specific evolutionary path. Not at all: we're all on our way somewhere else. No purpose - just constant, constant adaptation.
...
"...when you look at a flower you think 'how amazing this beautiful thing emerged by chance?'"
Yep. I think that quite a lot.
I thought it looking at the orchids in Darwin's greenhouse at a few weeks ago.
And then I thought 'How amazing this beautiful human sought to explain why this beautiful thing might emerge by chance...'
There is a good reason why flowers evolved, and as far as I'm concerned the hand of a creator God isn't in the equation. Random mutation, adaptation, survival, competition are all good enough reasons for me. Animals that live in groups (us) need rules to survive collectively (call them moral imperatives if you like). Chimps live in social groups, cooperate, share, communicate, and defend each other; they also fight and kill when resources are scarce. Sound familiar? As far as I know they don't believe in God.
The entire Universe emerged by chance. No reason why our obscure and dusty corner, with all the life teeming on it, should be any different. I personally find that more awe-inspiring that the idea of God. I respect faith, I just don't share it.
Respecting faith
Excellent post Adman, I wish I could convey my thoughts so well.
Have an arrow.
...
Thanks, Jack.
You are a gent.
Morality and Religion
Sorry to butt in on someone else's argument, but when you say this:
are you suggesting that religion is the source of morality? Because there are numerous examples throughout history of religion being the cause of all sorts of immoral behaviour. Just a couple of random examples: the Ustase in Croatia and the "Rat Line" used to hide Nazis after WW2. The bible itself can is full of what we would call immoral behaviour; amongst other things, God approves of lying, racism, slavery, robbery, human sacrifice and adultery. Happy to provide the citations if you want them.
Now, 99% of Christians today wouldn't tolerate any of those things. So, where do we get that morality from? It ain't religion.
Sorry if I have misunderstood your argument.
Morals vs ethics
A commonly posed question is "if there is no god then where do our morals come from and how can we agree them?". Without wishing to stir up an argument, there is a factual aspect which helps clarify things, namely that morals and ethics are two different things.
Morals refer to an individual's own attitudes, values and beliefs. Morals can (and obviously do) vary from one person to the next. There is no need for people's morals to be the same, and they only even potentially become an issue when they influence the person's behaviour in public, which is where they become ethics.
Ethics relate to how we interact as a society and in communities and social gatherings (eg at work, on websites, etc). There, we do need to have some sort of agreement otherwise it falls apart.
So for instance I may employ robust Anglo Saxon language in the company of friends, but not in front of my children or mum: that doesn't mean I'm conflicted or have loose morals, it just means I appreciate the different ethical rules which apply in different situations.
No...
I was implying that God, not religion, ratbiter, is the source of morality, but I asked the question because I'm interested in other people's answers, not mine. You didn't give an answer, you just said it wasn't religion and repeated my question. I said further up that religion is something created by humans, so we can't expect it to be a wholly good thing, which it isn't. God, however is an entirely different proposition. The bible was written by humans and contains inconsistencies, but I don't dismiss it on that basis. Instead I wrestle with it and try to reach a deeper understanding. Much of what you shoot down in flames is in the old testament, and Jesus taught very differently. Although he was a Jew, he overturned a lot of what Jews believe. Christian understanding of God is filtered through him and not the admittedly strange (to modern ears) content of some of the OT.
Mainly the same argument
I understand your point but the problem with how you made it is that people that don't believe that gods exist would consider that any god mentioned is, along with religion, something created by humans. I can see how you make the distinction but if you don't believe in a god then the distinction becomes too blurred to notice in this context.
Woody
As the Max von Sydow character says in "Hannah and her Sisters":
"If Jesus came back to earth now and saw what was being done in his name, he wouldn't be able to stop throwing up..."
Quite tickled me, that one....
Work from home ?
At least 2 or 3 days a week. If that's a no go, talk to your employer about flexible working hours. An ex colleague of mine used to work 90%. He didn't work Wednesdays and stayed with a friend Mon and Thurs nights. Ok that meant 2 nights away from home, but worth it for the extra "quality time" with his family and only 4 long commutes a week instead of 10.
Bamthwok
I started to feel this way not long after our second child came along. She'll be 3 in November. I run my own business, have employees, many clients etc. and her arrival seemed to be a tipping point as regards juggling all those spinning plates.
So I let some of them fall. On the one hand I'm lucky in that I'm my own boss so I have a final say on the majority of work related issues but on the other hand I have commitments and responsibilities I can't walk away from. As an employee you perhaps feel that you also have commitments and responsibilities you can't walk away from. I'd ask though this question of yourself from the outset: if you don't feel any commitment and/or sense of responsibility then what is the point of doing the job you're doing? It's not enough, in my book, just to get along with the people you work with or to just tick along in your job unless you can view your job as giving you the money to pursue your real interests. But most of us don't have that kind of job, whatever money we make is swallowed up by the financial drain of our personal commitments and responsibilities.
This was where my barrier came up, the realisation that my personal life and work-life primarily revolved around commitment and responsibility. Where was the fun? Where was the time to do anything else without feeling guilty about not doing something out of commitment or responsibility? It is a mentally crippling situation to be caught up in and in all honesty there is no avoiding those commitments and responsibilities but there are ways of making them seem less onerous. The first thing is to check your behaviour and mood and act accordingly. I noticed myself getting an ever shorter fuse, often triggered by stupid unimportant things so I monitored that and made myself take some time out (just 5 minutes). The next thing I did was make some plans with my wife to do stuff either together or with the kids that went on the calendar. Again I'm not talking weekends away but perhaps 1 hour to play a game, go for a walk, look at old photos, talk!
Next, look at work. Can you ask for flexi-time? Is the 2.5 hour commute a factor of the time in which you travel? Can you do some of your work by starting a couple of hours earlier and leaving earlier or having 2-3 days when you work longer hours to free up time later in the week and be fresher for the weekend? Can you do some of your job at home? But whatever you discuss with your boss remember that you understand your commitments and responsibilities and make sure he/she knows you do as part of your discussion.
But I repeat let some things just fall. I can't tell you what those things are but I stopped doing a load of admin work and farmed it out to the accountant. I have to pay him more to do it and as a result take home less but I gained time with the family as a result. I have fewer meetings and expect better agendas for meetings I do have and better outcomes, I ignore emails until an allotted time of the day. I only worry about what I can do, not about what I can't. I have become a standard bearer for standardisation in the way I communicate with my staff and with my clients and this has helped everyone become more aware of their role and their importance in the process of work. I standardise where possible to free people to do what they're good at. I'm no good at admin but I'm good at identifying solutions to client problems.
And finally, yes, some of these barriers will naturally fall and some will pass more quickly than others. Humans are pretty adaptive and becoming a father for the second time around required a greater adaptive leap on my part because I think there was less adrenaline to get me through the difficult stages of adapting as there was with the first child. I knew where all the dull, repetitive stages were in the process.
Be careful
and be wary of that frustration, I tried to do everything, ignored the frustration and resentment and came apart one day in the bosses office. Luckily he was ok about it, sent me home for a week and after some readjustment in life and work and some professional help I got back on track. 4 kids, wife with issues of her own and job that kept me out of the house for 12 hours a day including travel is not sustainable and I cracked. When I look back on how I treated my wife in that time and how close I was to losing my job I realise how lucky I've been not to lose both. As Ahh_Bisto says, let some things fall, things will get better.
That was a few years ago, one son is living happily away from home, one is off to University this week and the other two are enjoying school with a good social life. Me and the wife have time to spend together, I spend far too much time on this blog which has helped enormously and I've started to listen to music other than Justin Currie's rather dour outlook on life. As someone who always thought stress was bollocks and who lived his life thinking I can do anything because of my dad's experiences in WW2, (if he dealt with that I can deal with...........fill in the gap) it comes as a real shock when the wheels do come off and it comes without warning.
I can sympathise with that one
particularly the bit about ploughing onward in the belief that as other people's experiences have been worse, then your own circumstances don't need attention, change, or just talking about.
Everyone has a breaking point,and it's better to pre-empt that before it's reached rather than try to put broken pieces back together afterwards.
"better to pre-empt that before it's reached"
...you're right DL, we all have breaking points. Even Mr Amitri! I've soldiered on in a job I'm very unhappy in for years, hardly a sick day at all, stiff upper lip attitude and all that, even throughout a past year which has been nothing but misery, lies and angst thanks to Human Resources and management scumbaggery.
And then I just knew it had to stop, for my sanity - that having done everything possible to try and bring the issues to a conclusion and being thwarted every time by the HR bastards, that I had to simply remove myself from the fray. I went to my doctor recently and received several weeks off on stress, and a weight lifted at once. It's not a permanent solution but when it gets to the point that much of your waking thought is taken up with an image of smashing a HR bastard's face in with a baseball bat, it's time to get a grip.
I'm volunteering one day a week, from October, as a Citizen's Advice Bureau advisor - as a direct effect of that year's (and ongoing) experience of jobsworths and unhappiness.
It's a case of taking control in some way - which is the message for everyone that seems to be coming out of this thread. Okay, I can't seem to get an alternative job in a hurry but I can (hopefully) just about deal with the loss of earnings of a 4 day week while (hopefully) having the satisfaction of helping other people. I'm sure that's a partial solution that won't be feasible for everyone, but the general message is identify the exact problem with the work/life thing (time? job satisfaction? prospects? etc) and try and think outside the box. Sometimes sideways or down in the short term can mean a sideways and up in the longer term.
This site/ blog/ thread
I dont want to sound like I am just repeating someones elses thoughts, but I went through a lot of heavy duty heartache (My wife died suddenly, lost my Dad after prolonged agonising illness, son almost killed in Iraq, divorce from an alchoholic , violent womean who had the face of an angel, & others)
These in turn all helped me climb into a whisky bottle for several years, work suffered,my health, friendships & family all suffered, not good.
Slowly turned a corner, now got a wonderful girlfriend who I adore, cut the drinking right back, slowly spending more time happy than unhappy, & beginning to feel optimistic again.
Fully aware that things can change, but enjoying feeling "better" while I am.
Without a doubt, the time I spend on here, (& its far too long, becoming part of my life !!) I think helps me enormously.
I have learned so much, not just music & movies, but, I dont know, just stuff really.
I cant imagine a day without going on this site, & commenting on something or other. It is to me, the not knowing where a discussion will go that I enjoy, that & the witty comments I wish I could think of.
Cheers Y,all.
Well I'm sure you feel better now
A problem shared and all that. I hope the advice and words above have made you feel better. I commuted for 2hrs each way for just over a year and that almost cost me my relationship that and a few other factors. I hope you find a way to change your current set up as it's not doing you much good. Best of luck doing it.
I have a slightly different problem
as I have a different daily rythm than most people; a creature of the night so to speak.
Many years ago I worked ordinary hours until I got health problems from going against my inner clock. I was always tired, no matter how much I slept, I got ill all the time, the flu, colds, any virus showing up within the nearest mile would pounce on me.
Finally I got so screwed up that I first slept for three days straight and after that I couldn't sleep at all without medication.
So I got myself different working hours that are more in tune with my personal rythm, and have been in great health since. Of course my choice of work is rather narrow so I don't necessarily love what I do, but I'm grateful that I don't have to get up early in the morning anymore, and my colleagues are nice. Not crazy about my boss, but thanks to my hours I don't see much of him!
So what's the problem now ? Well, I come home from work when other people go to bed, so I can't do things that makes too much noise ( use the washing machine, hoover etcetera ). I can sometimes get up an hour early to get something done before I go to work, but if I do that too often I collapse on my day off and get nothing done then.
I can't get together with friends and family before work, when they are at their work. I can't see them after work, when they are asleep.
So I have to do everything on my ( rather few ) days off. Washing, cleaning, washing up, cooking lots of food to bring to work for my "lunch" ( at your dinnertime ), go shopping and see my friends and family. And most of the time I work at the weekend and have a day off mid week instead, when it's difficult to meet up with friends.
Friends...I used to have lots of them, but after a great number of years working like this they are very few these days. People get tired of always getting the answer "sorry I can't, I'm working" or even worse; "I have to wash clothes" and finally they stop calling. And part of me is relieved when they do, then I don't have to feel guilty for not having the time to see them.
Now I just have to live with a guilty conscience towards my mother and siblings that I don't see as much as I would like to.
The positive side of the way I live is of course my health, but also that I have four to five hours every night when I can't do anything noisy, giving me the licence to read, watch TV ( headphones ), listen to music ( headphones ), writing long letters to my father ( who lives in another country ) and short stories, and of course this here interwebby thingumajig... [ it's my day off today of course, or I couldn't be here this early in the day! ]
So that's good, but sometimes I wonder who's going to come to my funeral...will I have any friends left by then ?
Ah well, I'll just have to get very socially busy when I hit retirement I guess!
"will I have any friends left by then ?"
...I sympathise Loc - I used to have an alternating day/night shift job, for a year in the early 90s. It was awful for my health and I missed out on friends/social stuff in the way you describe. I stuck it as long as I could, secured a first-time mortgage (in the days when you generally needed a 'permanent' job) and then got the hell out before it killed me.
Funny, though, I've been thinking about the friends thing recently - it's really important, I feel. And yet I seem to be finding that a number of long-standing friendships are drifting/decaying, perhaps for various reasons, perhaps just the ebb and flow of life. There's only so much you can do about it yourself - it really has to be a two-way thing or its not ultimately worth the bother (or is it...? after all, to give is often better than to receive, as I'm sure Jayhawk will agree).
I have one long-standing friend who had a significant birthday do recently, which several mutual friends were invited to and which one was performing at. The performing friend happened to ask the birthday girl if I'd been invited and was told 'No, I had to draw the line somewhere.' There were 70 people at that do. Maybe those are the 70 she wants at her funeral, who knows? But it made me think, and take a tough decision - maybe I'm right, maybe not - which was to effectively, but quietly write that person off my metaphorical Christmas card list. Not to be petulent, simply in recognition that being outside someone's Top 70 after 20-odd years of bonhomie, and having forgotten the last time they contacted me rather than vice-versa, means its time to put self-respect before time-wasting. Gives me no pleasure, only disappointment.
Life's a bummer, sometimes, isn't it?
Life's a bummer
It certainly can be. I have never been suicidal, but often wished I was dead. I was diagnosed some time ago with depression, & it took me at least 5 years before I could say it openly, but once I did, it slowly started to ease.
It still occasionally "turns dark", but it doesnt seem to happen so often, & doesnt seem to last as long.
Am I "getting better" ? - Fuck knows. But overall, I have optimism in my life, & that hasnt been there for a long long time, so I am enjoying being happy.
What do I do if / when the lights go out again ? I will cross that bridge as & when I get to it.
Hopefully
this doesn't sound corny but there's always a light on somewhere on this blog. That's why it's so good to come on here.
Word blog
I am going to seem like a total kissarse now, but as I said a few posts back, I genuinely do get strentgh from blogging here.
I dont want agreement, just informed comment, it does me nicely.
The odd bit of goss or bitchiness slips down a treat as well.
Word blog
I am going to seem like a total kissarse now, but as I said a few posts back, I genuinely do get strength from blogging here.
I dont want agreement, just informed comment, it does me nicely.
The odd bit of goss or bitchiness slips down a treat as well.
its the job
If you loved it the commute would be less of a grind. Well that's my view. But then again my commute is a minute long walk, and I work for myself - so if I hate it I only have myself to blame.
Being a Northerner, I don't understand London commutes. When I had a job, my commute was typically 15 to 20 miles and took 15 to 20 minutes. That would be, what, 90 minutes in London?
I proscribe a job in the north - less money, less culture, less commuting (usually).
I like my job too
I think you're probably right, I have to drive to work, I hate driving but the 30 minutes goes in a flash. It hit me a few weeks ago that I really like my job. These things must be correlated.
20 mins
Actually I think a 20 minute commute each way is probably perfect - allows you to gear up and wind down either side of the working day. My head is still often at work when my body is across the road at home.
I love this blog!
What started out as me flailing around in my everyday frustrations has splintered into a discourse on religious faith or the lack of. Who would have thought?!
Seriously, this is the first time I've 'reached out' (as I believe I would say if I was in a HBO production), and I appreciate your responses. Much appreciated, much consideration to be had and also a kick up my own backside that I'm actually a lucky bugger and I should stop this self-centred melancholy, target the affected area & take action. Hurrah!
I shall raise a glass to you all. Although one of the things I need to do is cut that down, so a mug of Earl Grey is brandished aloft.
The Word - a magazine, a podcast - save your life!
.
Another problem solved!
The Massive are very good source of practical advice if you're have an emotional crisis of some sort.
I refer the right honourable gentleman
to the posts I er, posted some time ago. Still unresolved ATOGTP ;-)
http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/content/life-changing-decisions-mid-life-c...
http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/content/mid-life-crisis-alert
Why thank you kind sir
I shall avail myself forthwith.
Er, not sure why I've adopted this writing style. May be something to do with the monocle & frock coat I've put on today.
Gene Vincent
Listen to singles, specifically rock 'n' roll singles, under two-and-a-half minutes long, they're shorter than albums.
Then you'll have more time to get to work.
I'll get me coat.....
A pleasure
Reading this thread has given me a half hour of very pleasurable thought and insight into how 'The Massive' help each other through life. I applaud you all. Not being religous myself, I admit that bit got a bit above me but I persevered and I'm glad I did. I commute by driving for about 2.5 hours a day but I'm lucky that I enjoy my job very much and have some great colleagues. One of my lifes ambitions though is to get a local(ish) job with little commute time as the older I get the harder the commute time becomes. In the meantime I trade this off with the fact I enjoy my work immensely. My father died from lung cancer when he was just 51 after a life spent working hard for his family. I want to last a bit longer than that hence the ambition to work closer to home and have more time for me and indeed my wife and family.