Entertainment For Lively Minds
NME memories
So when did the NME lose it for you? I loved it from 1974 to about 1982 when it became horribly right-on even for my horribly right-on student self. It led me to a lot of things cultural I wouldn't have found otherwise, for which i am grateful - but it utterly lost it with the emergence of the following:
Paul Morley (and the whole "Ian Curtis died for you" thing).
Blue Rondo a la Turk and frigging COCKTAILS.
Snide sneering at the non-metropolitan tastes of the provinces (Black Sabbath and Hawkwind are as much the right stuff of rock music as The Stooges and MC5).
Over-rating the whole landfill Indie thing.
"Everything But the Girl" - Everything but a tune and some energy, more like.
In the crapper and later days, it weas only Danny Baker and Stepehn Wells that kept be going. It now looks like a dumbed-down "Smash Hits" without the commercial independence of "Metal Hammer".
- More from Mr Grimsdale.
- Login or register to post comments










Nothing wrong with Smash Hits...
Possibly the second greatest music paper this country has ever produced.
(Zigzag was, of course, the first ;-))
I always feel
that the once-great Kerrang! has turned into Smash Hits for Goths.
Where once there were proper bands like Iron Maiden on the front every week, we now have insipid, prepubescent chancers with bad hair and black nail varnish staring blankly from the cover.
new markets for that pocket
new markets for that pocket money, innit? At least they listen to loud guitars and believe in live music.
"Smash Hits" only works if
"Smash Hits" only works if you believe there was anything in the early 1980s "new pop" to start with. Though I will certainly state that Pet Shop Boys and Wham! knock "Birdland" and "The Fall" into a cocked hat (barring the wonderful Mr E Smith's ever amusing observations) it really was a load of coke-addled fluff. Unlike the sulph-addled student fluff of the NME.
I hated the majority of 1980's new pop
but Smash Hits had a sense of FUN! It understood that pop music isn't anything to be overanalysed and taken seriously. It's supposed to be F-U-N and the utterances of 99.9% of pop stars are worthy only of having the piss taken out of them.
I loved Smash Hits
14 in 1979, the perfect market for it. I bought it until I was 22. It still makes me laugh today. I never was into NME. It was Record Mirror for me. I was never right on enough.
Dr Volume and I
still communicate using Smash Hits phrases to this day.
No, we do, really.. where are you going? Come back....no don't hang u...click...brrr...
I do believe....
this is where I come in :-)
The wilderness years
When the NME was my bible - from '97 to around 2000 - there wasn't much of a 'scene' to write about. This was the post-Britpop wilderness years, pre-Strokes, pre-Libertines, pre-indie landfill, so instead it was covering the likes of Mercury Rev, the Beta Band and Bonnie Prince Billy. (Oh, and nu-metal too, but in a kind of despairing way.) There was a bit of a campaign to get Mick Head from Shack recognised as the UK's greatest living songwriter if I remember rightly. NME probably considers it an era best forgotten but I discovered so much great music through it, new and old.
For me it began dumbing down seriously from the early 00's onwards, with the garage rock revival or whatever it was called - but then again, that also happened to be when I hit my mid-20s, so I probably just outgrew it.
Looking back
at the old NMEs now, it's shocking how amateurish they seem. I've got copies dating back to the early 70s and the layout and standard of the journalism is little better than a badly written student magazine.
Sure we had Charlie Murray, Nick Kent, Burchill and Parsons, all of whom were clearly gifted writers, but the bulk of the paper was full of naff in-jokes and laboured topical references, many of which seem awkward, dated and all but unreadable now.
For example, a mid-70s issue I pulled out at random has the NME editor apologising for calling Rod Stewart "a big girl's blouse" in a previous issue.
Cutting edge stuff, or what?
NME's Best Writer Was Danny Baker.
Check out, if you can find it, his piece on the Jackson 5 and the press conference with Yoshi the Japanese journalist. Priceless.
You can find it...
...here - 'A Kid On The Edge' - Michael Jackson's Last Interview
Actually
I just checked again and in fact the Rod apology was because NME called him a "Nancy Boy" and not a "big girl's blouse" as I claimed earlier.
There is a distinction apparently and Rodders was quite right to demand a retraction. ;-)
Charles Shaar (Charlie?) Murray
I was reading a review, the other day, that was so pretentious that it reminded me of the 'rock press' of the 70's. Some of the words used were horribly mangled and, quite possibly, imaginary, and, as far as the writer being so petit bourgoise as to put his 'clever' writing into an intelligible sentence... no chance.
Blimey, I hadn't seen this sort of cobblers in years!
All became clear upon checking out who wrote it.
Oh yes, king of 70's buffoon journalism, Charles Shaar bloody Murray.
Charlie
was one of the "schoolkids" who created Issue #28 of Oz magazine aka the infamous Schoolkids' Edition.
He was actually 19 at the time, but here's how he got his start in rock journalism
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2001/aug/02/pressandpublishing.g2
Easy ...
Sigue Sigue Sputnik cover with headline 'Would you pay £4M for this cr*p?'
Airbrushing The Inconvenient Out of History
Of course, The Levellers could be annoying little twerps but let us not forget what an astonishing phenomenon they were. They progressed from grotty liitle pubs in New Cross to three-night stints in an Enormodome near you in little more than three years. All by word of mouth, no TV or radio to speak of, and the deserved reputation of one of the best live bands on the circuit.
In fact, there was hardly any press at all, and what there was tended towards the derogatory. The point is that 'Zeitgeist' was pipped to No.1 in first week of release by the Charlatans: to number one in the NME chart second week, and from there downwards. The NME amended the 'last week ' chart to show that they had in fact never been number 1 at all. They did 'fess up to this, but this sort of airbrushing out of history just about summed the NME up. This, and the sycophantic adulation of bands like the Charlatans and (gulp) Elastica did for me.
Did the Levellers ever play enormodomes?
Crikey, I always had them down as permanent habitues of the Odeon/City Hall/West Runton Pavilion circuit
Oh Yes.
Birmingham NEC, three sold out nights, 1994, I think. And also, they hold claim to the biggest audience ever for the Pyramid stage - not the year they headlined the Glastonbury Saturday night (yes, really), but the year before when they played on the Saturday afternoon. Some of it's on YouTube. It's an enormous crowd, going very scarily bonkers.
I know they're on record as saying that they thought they were lucky to have got as big as they did, but I think they had it in them to be truly huge, especially in America. They blew it. Or bottled it, depending on your point of view.
Didn't Jeremy from Ver Levellers
Send Andrew Collins a poo in a box once. I've always wondered about the mechanics of such an act. Is it done as a solitary act of scatological vandalism or in front of the rest of the group, Benjamin, Tarquin et al? Presumably one then had to shuffle to the restroom, trousers around one's ankles, to carry out the clean-up part of the project. Then there is the nervous wait in the queue at the Post Office to get it weighed and tricky decisions to be made about insurance and whether to insist on a signature.
Viva La Revolution!
Was either Collins or Maconie
either way, I believe they accidentally reviewed the stool, thinking it was the new Levs album and gave it 7/10 "a return to form".
I thought...
... the poo in question was sent because of a headline which read: "Levellers Give Fleas To Dog"
Ooh, bilious remarks above
Such bile! Like it or hate it, the NME was undoubtedly a core part of the music scene from the late 70's to the late 80's. Great writers - Burchill, Parsons, Barney Hoskyns, Ian Penman, Morley, Nick Kent - doesn't matter if you violently disagreed with them, but they all had a passion for music and championed their favourites. I enjoyed the ride myself, and it opened up many areas of music for me that I had never heard of. If you lived in a small town in the provinces it was an eagerly awaited despatch from somewhere far more exciting than we could possibly imagine. I don't care if it reads badly in retrospect, or if you have an aversion to some of the writers and the bands they championed. But it made the whole scene a lot more fun, and promoted bands who might never had made it otherwise - yes, some of them were good. NME and John Peel - a great combination and an education for those of us in our formative musical years.
Also
The thrill of getting it on a Tuesday night if you were at a gig in London.
I must confess – to having been a Melody Maker supporter
...in the early 90s.
A friend of mine used to buy the NME so I would read his copy and buy the Melody Maker for myself. Subsequently I’ve found it difficult to remember what I read in the NME and what I read in MM. Either way I’m guessing that for many of us, the inkies were at their most potent in our late teen years. For me they were a guiding light from 16 through to 18 (in my case about 1990 – 1992). Highlights were anything to do with Suede, Ride, The Roses or The Mondays. Oh and the highly amusing Mr Abusing / Mr Agreeable in the MM
During the Britpop era I got into House music and while some good records were made during the mid 90s, I’m not sure that Blur, Oasis, et al did anything then that hadn’t already been done by the bands I mentioned above??
The thing I remember most clearly is -
- from about 1978 - going into my (state) school and the NME readers all abruptly changing their appearance in unison every six months - and jesus christ the way they sneered at the rest of us for - in my case - still liking the Ruts for example. It was not very 'independent', in fact it seemed like capitalism in action to me, finding new ways to get into middle class pocket money. But there was a huge variety in the music at the time and even if the NME seemed to be written by miserable sods who patronised seven kinds of shit out of you, FOR miserable sods who patronised seven kinds of shit etc., it was still a part of it, and there weren't that many ways of finding out about music or hearing it.
Can't forgive them for the cow-punk nonsense and there were plenty of other ones like that, dead ends nobody else charged up... it was a badge of sorts and nothing wrong with that but a bit, well, joyless
Never read Smash Hits or Record Mirror because it seemed a bit like snidey gossip about the latest consumer products - like making smart remarks about the new spring fridge lineup - but I definitely subscribed to the idea that its supposed to be FUN then and now.
Also the bastard NME ink always came off all over you
I was a Sounds man myself
Couldn't stick Julie Burchill then or indeed now.
NME
finished with it when the front cover was a Bikini clad cleavage with the word Ibiza written across it in cocaine.
Mine is a similar story
I too was a Sounds man but took up the NME when Sounds folded. I stopped buying it the week their lead news story was 'The Strokes go Go-Karting'.
Ah!
I remember that cover. I bought NME, as usual, on a Wednesday morning and left it in the pocket of my coat at work, where somone pinched it.
I probably didn't miss much.
Ah! The memories.
I bought the NME every week from about late '75 until the summer of '85. I visited Los Angeles for the first time in '85. You could find the NME in LA if you looked hard enough, but it would be 2 weeks old and 5 times the price. By the time I got home in October I didn't really miss it any more.
I do remember looking forward to the Christmas edition and the giant crossword, though.
Aye, them were the days.
Ooh! Just thought of something else...
There were two bands that seemed to be in the NME gig guide every week back in those days, and for some strange reason they've stuck in my mind after all these years.
Juan Foot 'N' The Grave and the other one was The Entire Population Of China.
Not For Me
I've never bought a copy of NME, and have never felt the need to. The only reason I read it now is because it's at work.
lost its way big time
for a few years recently, but I'm going to stick my head above the parapet and say that the latest restyling is actually pretty good. Well, a lot better than it was under the previous editor (Conor someone). More content, more to read (still nothing I can't polish off on the average lunch break), and just generally less of the feel that it's a shillsheet for whatever label bought the coke in exchange for a cover
Some fond memories
I have fond memories of the NME. I bought it between about 1984 and 1999. It shaped not just my music tastes but politics and humor. I still occasionally buy a copy for old times sake but am quickly reminded why i don't get it every week as i used to. In fact Wednesday Mornings were greeted with excitement, which seems incredible when you see what it's become. I clung on way past it's best but the end seemed to roughly coincide with the shrinking of it's size and the on-set of nasty shiny paper. Also the tabloidisation of it's stars the Gallaghers, Albarn, Jarvis etc, brought that culture with it and the Alternative or Indie of old were no more.
Used to love the Christmas end of year review/piss-up, usually involved Mark E Smith, Shane McGowan and Nick Cave drinking each other under the table whilst slagging of the years highlights.
John Connolly, New Barnet
The NME was never the same after they stopped printing his letters every week.
Whatever happened to Adrian Thrills?
He was a regular in Record Mirror's Mailman, too
Styling himself "John Connolly, the Wit of New Barnet". Other regular RM correspondents: Paul Humphreys, the Least Famous Person in Stoke on Trent; and King of the Nosebleeds.
NME cassettes...............
1983 through to probably 1991 for me - anyone remember the 'Youth Suicide' cover?! Some articles have stayed with me - a 4 parter on record collecting and an interview with Tim Roth (1986?).
What I'll remember most fondly are the cassettes, usually around three quid a pop and introduced me to some great stuff. Loved and still play the Dept of Enjoyment compilation - Nick Cave, Smiths, Papa Levi, Night People was a great introduction to all things jazz and The Tape With No Name was as good a country compilation as any.
.........and haven't even mentioned C81 and C86.
Smile Jamaica
Brilliant Cassette.
I'm a sucker for a good pun
and no-one did them better than the NME. I remember loads of them but I was recently pleased to discover that the lovely Stuart Maconie penned my two absolute favourites:
"Hacienda That!" - when the famed nightclub closed and, when reviewing a Bruce Springsteen tribute competition - "You wait an hour for a Boss then three come along at once!"
Bloody marvellous.
I remember in one of the 'Thrills' columns...
... the article mentioned that someone had "flown off in a huff" which was followed by (what was its wingspan? - ed.)
Roogalator
Nick Kent talked them up in a big feature after he'd seemingly run out of excessive activities to report from the Stones' camp.
Think NME lost me about then.
But I always had a chuckle at the Lone Groover and even bought some T-shirts.
I started to sense something wasn't
quite right with some of the writers at the NME in the late 80's when I read the following sentence, in an article about Northern Ireland, which I was so shocked by I can still remember it word for word. If anyone can corroborate I'd be grateful.
"You can almost see the meanness of their thoughts on their pinched, protestant faces"
This from the right -on bible of the late '80s. Did I dream that? Can anyone really have been capable of such bigoted garbage and, even worse, have managed to get it published? I also dimly remember an interview with the Proclaimers which was one prolonged sneer at Scotland generally and the concept of devolution in particular.
I think the deeply sinister and totalitarian SWP were having a bit of an influence at the time through Steven Wells which may be one explanation. The other might be that it had turned into a fanzine for cunts.
I think it probably always was...
... I felt it was that even ten years previously (maybe its an age thing who knows) - but there was usually some good writing and some jokes in there. Just re-reading the Nick Kent 'Dark Stuff' anthology again - as a result of this thread - and when he's not pretending he's Hunter S Thompson he's wonderful and it used to be great to see his stuff hot off the press. Burchill was poison but funny but the one I hated and who seemed to exemplify the spirit of the thing was Parsons - mean, foul tempered, score settling, not really interested in music but in attempting to make the current definitive statement. Even PAul Morley - who I HATED at the time - had a sense of humour and could write (though much much MUCH too much)
NME
Lost me about 98, no particular reason, think I just got old.
I had been an avid reader from 74 - 85, an intermittent reader after that.
Dont think I have bought it in 10 years or more.
Is the lone groover still going ??
Sadly no
He grooves alone.
I used to buy it for the cartoons... The Lone Groover, but mainly the godlike genius of Ray Lowry.
I started in 1976ish with an issue with a poster of the 100 greatest singles. I stopped some time in the 90s (post Nirvana). But I think of it like Radio 1 - they should be targeting teenagers and they are doing something wrong if a 48 year old codger like me still "gets" them.
Radio 1
Good comment, if I get NME, then its time to send for Roger Bannister I think.
Have an up.
Roger Bannister
I err, meant Matthew Bannister.
Being told
Being told that bands like Tiger, Linoleum, Bis and Ultrasound were the next big thing when they were clearly pants.
I should never have given them a second chance after they'd told me S*M*A*S*H, These Animal Men, Combat and The Stupidz were the future of rock n roll a decade earlier.
74 - 81
Were my NME years. CSM, Nick Kent, Tony Tyler, Ian McDonald, Ray Carr, early Danny Baker etc al. these were the great writers and the classic NME years, though I think everyone thinks the era they were in was THE one. I lost interest with the Penman / Morley years, not, I think, because the writing was bad but rather the whole post punk thing (stiff, grooveless guys in shorts with silly haircuts) just passed me by.
HJH?
I was pretty addicted to NME 1977-1985ish… Yeah, Penman & Morely did get tiresome, but recall emergence of the great Barney Hoskyns early 80’s. In New Zealand, we’d get the surface mail editions 2-3 months after UK, but I recall NME being so cheap, it was easy to keep buying.
However, my favourite memory of the whole thing was the “Where is Beatles band?” in the letters page, I think. I’d love to read that again.
Funny you should say that
I remember the "where is Beatles Band?" saga with great affection and have been trying to track it down on the net, but there is very little to be found.
It was covered briefly on here I think, but all that could be gleaned was that the writer of the missives (Samuel K Ampong, Ghana) was possibly Danny Baker.
I'd love to see all the letters gathered together in one place.
Where is Beatle band?
I recall it as "Where is Beatle Band?", not Beatles. And I can't remember anything else about it except that it was long-running and endlessly amusing. Of course, to a teenager of the time, "long-running" may have been 6 weeks.
I'd forgotten the Ghana part, but "Samuel K. Ampong" has stuck firmly in the memory all these years.
And yes, it would be lovely to find that someone had saved some or all of the letters! I do have a bundle or two of cuttings somewhere that have remained unopened two continents and many homes later. I wonder if Mr. Ampong's correspondence is among them.
I know for sure that I have some Lowry and Lone Groover cuttings.
The great thing is
it's taken on a life of its own. I told my kids about the "Where is Beatles band" saga when they were little. They thought it was hugely funny and started saying it too.
The next generation
We're the same - our kids grew up hearing about Samuel K. It's one of our family catch phrases. I really must try and find those cuttings!
Similarly
much to the bemusment of visiting friends and relatives, my kids can (and often do) quote huge chunks of the Beatles' Christmas Records.
Ah, the perils/benefits of growing up in a rock & roll household.
I'm pretty sure it was Samuel K. Amphong
with an 'h'.
You could be right about the 'h'
I think you're right. Certainly a search for "Samuel K. Amphong" seems to generate more responses in Google than the k'less version. Someone seems to think it was Danny Baker, but I say, "citation needed".
And I presume this thing I found online is merely a parody but it captures my memory of Samuel quite well:
"Drowned In Sound! Where is Beatles band? This band who have not been as of late clear of circumstance. Beatles Band! Can we no longer hear there medolious throng? John! Paul! All in Beatles Band come forth! What question have we to put? Now? Arguments neccessary can begin with whole results expected for any return. Ringo! Here in Thailand Beatles band experience is long loved and can be hurt away from John, Paul etc. Please give any news to Samuel K. Amphong of address similar to above. yours as in rock! Samuel K Amphong."
Someday I will find my cuttings!
No longer of fan of The Beatles Band?
Or if he is, he's not sharing the love with his Facebook friends!
http://www.facebook.com/people/Samuel-K-Ampong/100000500648149
Smash Hits and NME
They complemented each other nicely throughout the 80s for me. I do recall a long and meandering Paul Morley NME interview of David Sylvian which I was struggling to get through. Then came the question: "What, then, is life?". Oh boy. I admire both gentlemen tremendously, but I do have a tosh threshhold.
It's actually getting better again
the recent overhaul and new editor have worked wonders - it's moved closer to what it used to be.
I think it does what it does pretty well these days.
I read it in the late 90's - early 2000's, when I was a teenager. Opened my eyes to some great bands, genres etc, including the aforementioned Mercury Rev, who I still love. It's hard to imagine these days that a Mercury Rev album was NME's album of the year a little over a decade ago.
I check the website for the latest news of Rock and Pop
but their website is so devoid of character, personality and wit it certainly doesn't encourage me to dip back into the paper. They ought to take a leaf out of the Word's book and have a site which truly reflects and compliments the publication.
Speaking as an oldie
I find the NME to be a bit like Radio 1 these days. Whenever I tune in or browse, both of them appear to be shouting at me
Read it for most of the 90s
I pretty much read it weekly between 1991 and 1998 - 14 to 21 and only if it looked like it had something interesting in it from 1998 to around 2006 - so increasingly less.
I think the day it dawned on me that I was only buying it for the excellent crossword was the day I stopped for good.
Regarding the new look - I did buy the first issue out of curiosity, but there wasn't that much in there to excite me. It's going to take a lot to help it recover from the pigs arse that Conor McNicholas made of it and, even though I have no wish to buy it, I don't want to see it lost from the newsstands.
The last-dated copy I had
of the cache of NMEs sold onto a kindly fellow who finds them useful for research had the cover strapline
"Voulex-vous dansez avec moi"
as a come-on for a survey of what they deemed Euro-rock or something similar in the early 80s.
I could live with creative abuse of the english language on a regular basis, but not pig-ignorance regarding the French language (though I'm sure it wasn't the reason for hanging up my NME-buying boots in the early 80s). Said cache (1973 - early 80s) was endlessly diverting to pull out from time, in both good and bad ways ...
Conor McNicolas, Paul Rees and Phil Alexander…
…have saved me a lot of money by making their respective journals unreadable.
McNicolas, as discussed turned NME into a flimsy gossip rag with sponsorship logos dominating every last inch of paper.
Rees has turned Q into something that looks more like a website than a friendly journal…
Meanwhile Alexander (formerly of Kerrang!) inevitably tipped the balance of Mojo way too far in the rock direction (so more a case of not being to my taste than an outright sabotage)
Doubtless all three have acted at the behest of so many focus groups and so much pressure from sponsors that the magazines have lost much of their character. I really hope Word can maintain its…
Mid 70s - 80s , it did at
Mid 70s - 80s , it did at least open me up to stuff thats now easily accessible via media/ internet ( independent American cinema , US TV, politics , obscure literature , European films- Herzog ,Wenders,)Also pretty supportive of decent soul/jazz .
Remember broadsheets didnt have multiple sections in those days - even sport had no more than a couple of pages - so any vaguelly intelligent writing on these subjects was limited .
Lost it for me once I realised I was fed up with being told how "important" or "essential" a band were - usually some self important , arty student mob who had one decent track and then obscurity .
The tapes were pretty good.The Northern Soul one still gets a spin.
Finally : I remember when Adrian Thrills loved the UK Subs .Hes actually a Daily Mail reviewer now .
NB:I hate the Mail but it appears as a freebie with Tesco shopping deliveries.We toyed with asking it to be witheld - but its useful on a Know Thy Enemy basis and is as bad / scaremongering as expected .
1994-2000
Started with Blur/Oasis/Pulp...I forget who it ended with.
There's no doubt that the NME was a signifier of who/what was cool, which is pretty important when you're 14, and it was also a way of liking bands no-one else had heard of. It seems quite embarrassing, looking back.
The thing I always remember is that there were two types of interview: the fawning and the piss-take. I recall one interview with Bobby Gillespie where they just denigrated everything he said, and I remember one with Oasis - at the time of Be Here Now - where they practically acted as Noel's own personal toilet roll, they'd ventured so far up his arse. You still see Noel on the cover now, 'cause they know the bugger sells.
A friend had a copy of the NME about a year ago, so I had a glance through. It seemed to be desperately craving some sort of coherent music scene, but the industry is so fractured, the mag just seemed to be dying on its arse.
1986 - 1996
C86 All Stars - Tallulah Ghosh, The Weddoes, Grebo, The New Wave of New Wave and Collins & Maconie editing the chortlesome Thrills! page. I lost interest with the arrival of Elastica and then Britpop.
I read it every week between
1980 and 1983. Then I went to Art School and had to economise my life.
Liked the 'Gasbag' letters page. There was a particularly nasty Gasbag spat between Robert Elms and Paolo Hewitt because, I think, the latter had called the former a 'Spandau Lickarse' in some article. Arf!
I remember the very first NME compilation cassette. It was called 'Dancin' Master' and you had to send away for it - I think I've still got it somewhere.
Those great christmas editions which had single page interpretations of various songs of the year. I particularly remember Serge Clerc's illustration of 'Stool pigeon'. Would love to see his work on the cover of Word.
Anton Corbjin's lovely photography, often on a single full page in that large format. I used to put them on my wall.
In '82 Paul Du Noyer wrote a brilliant and touching feature on Liverpool, my home city. I'd love to read that again.
Corbijn/du Noyer
1. Yes, you could pay 35p or whatever it was for the NME and see the most fantastic photographs, week after week.
Pete Townshend by Anton Corbijn
I was as pleased as punch to finally meet the tall Dutchman in 1982, and he signed my NME front cover of Ian McCulloch standing next to a white horse. Result!
2. I too remember Paul du Noyer's piece. I believe it was entitled "Liverpool - the North-West Affront". As far as I recall, the final sentence of the article was something like "... and I wonder, will the last person to leave the city please turn out the lights?". Superb piece.
What an extraordinary picture
I love everything about this. I hope it wasn't a set-piece. I imagine crossing the road and seeing PT loom from the darkness like a misunderstood fairytale baddie.
Set piece?
Bound to be. Who chooses to sit in the jump seat in a black cab?
Fondly remembered
The po-faced, pretentious, snobby side was there post-punk, but amidst that there was much to amuse. As Noel Gallagher has said, the Morrissey interviews were usually highly entertaining and often hilarious - due to his considerable wit. Danny Baker's singles reviews regularly championed the uncool, not indie-rock type releases, e.g. disco, and not just to be a contrarian but out of a genuine love for the record I felt. I tried the other rags but found them comparatively dull, lacking the mischevious fun of the NME. And of course there was no where else to read about this stuff, or even see it, back then (other than at a gig).
Sounds
Loved this cutting jibe from Ian McCulloch when some hapless hack from Sounds was sent backstage to interview him at a Bunnymen gig in the early 80's
"'Oo are you?" asked McCulloch.
"I'm from Sounds" replied the scribe.
"Sounds magazine?!!" chortled McCulloch, "Aren't they still printing centrepage posters of Brian Connolly of The Sweet ?"
Ouch.
Bland copyists The Stone Roses...
...on The cover of the 1989 Christmas edition: "On Top Of The World", it screamed - blind to the obvious irony - marking the end of the hip-hop wars and the beginning of an era in which British music became wilfully insular, backward-looking, and inexplicably self-important.
The NME completely lost their identity and any kind of critical distance in the rush to anilinguise the Roses, and they consequently spent the next 20 years flip-flopping from one fad to another in search of the next big thing. They never even bought into The Smiths that much.
Not sure about your closing assertion...
after all, it was known as the New Morrissey Express for a while :-)
They used him
and he shifted a lot of units when they stuck him on the cover, but he was not bathed in the same adulation by the writing staff that the Roses later had thrown at them. They were far more popular amongst NME readers than they were NME writers.
Their album reviews were at best complementary without ever being adulatory, they often received a pasting in the singles reviews, and they never really featured that highly in their end-of-years. If anyone, it was Prince, Bobby Womack and Public Enemy that received the brunt of the NME's bumlickery during this period, and it wasn't until Len Brown wrote his review of "Strangeways" that The Smiths received anything approaching the same level of acclaim.
The Queen Is Dead
had a rave review.
Charles Shaar Murray's
obituary for Alex Harvey, "The Faith Healer", from the NME is one of my favourite pieces of writing in any genre.
Re: Those NME tapes...
... I recently moved and found a box of NME tapes I thought had been lost. There must be at least a dozen of them. I even bought a used boombox so that I could play them again. Blimey! It took me back to what seemed like a former life. Fantastic!
The Lost Tapes
I had a whole box of cassettes including many an NME freebie and left it behind following a house move. One of my few big regrets.
A partial collection (about half) of the NME tapes
may or may not be available on a Demonoid torrent which may (or may not) be sloshing around the bit of Interweb that hides behind the wardrobe.
Mmm
What should one search (or not search) for?
Assuming such a torrent existed on Demonoid
it would probably be under something like 'NME cassette tapes'.
Perhaps.
the highs and lows
Those NME tapes were tremendous and broadened my listening palate profoundly - though there was always SOME student shouty bollocks to be found - hence the genre tapes were best (and still are, Word cover disc compiler note).
On the downside: who remembers "rockism" and "rockists"? PC appropriating popular music selectively is never pretty, and the berks who tried this one on needed a good slap.
The occasional bit by Robert Elms was enough to have me throw down the paper like my dad was reading somethign about trade unions. Was there ever a person more deservedly told "see you next Tuesday"?
Robert frickin' Elms
Has there ever been a more deluded twerp in music journalism than Elms?
Suggestor of possibly the worst pop band name ever in Spandau Ballet? Check.
Presenter of one of the most cringey amateurish Yoof tv shows in the Oxford Road Show? Check.
Editor of fashion-wank Face Magazine at it's most ludicrous and pretentious? Check.
Musical director for The Worst British Movie Ever in Absolute Beginners? Check.
Any one of the above "achievements" in your cv would make most sensible minded people cringe with terminal embarrasment now, but anyone who's listened to Elms' BBC London show will know the arrogant oaf still thinks he's some important significant fashion visionary from all his dubious 80's achievements (in between all the Sade records he still insists on playing)
Idiot.
The Face
Elms was a regular contributor, but he was never editor.
Leafing through
some NMEs from the early-mid 70s today, I was intrigued and charmed in equal measure by the small ads.
Everything from bootleg LPs (sold openly) to loon pants, army greatcoats (ideal for those chilly Wishbone Ash gigs) and all manner of drug paraphernalia was ready available to the young and impressionable NME reader back then.
Wallpaper
And ceiling tiles. My whole bedroom between the ages of 13 and 17 was covered with NME covers on the ceiling and posters and clippings on the walls. I usually salivated at the prospect of getting my mitts on the double bumper Christmas edition and read every copy from cover to cover. The Melody Maker was like my Daily Mail of the teenage years. I wouldn't touch it even if it had the Stuffies/ Kingmaker/ Thousand Yard stare on the cover. Don't know what the aversion was. Could have simply been the layout. Stroppy little opinionated brat I was.
Late 70's to Early 90's...
It has pretty much all been said already, but I lived for the weekly thrill that was my NME, and when I started working in London in 82, it meant I could get my inky fingers on a copy one evening earlier, and devour it on the train journey home. I would read from cover to cover, and used to keep every issue, until they yellowed and decayed. I wish I had kept a few select issues for nostalgia alone, especially those double Christmas issues.
The tapes were wonderful, and somewhere in my store room I have a box that must contain over 30 of them. I keep meaning to search them out and convert for iPod consumption, though I don't even have a tape deck that functions. I would buy every one indiscriminately, they were issued in batches, and compiled by Roy Carr if I remember correctly. There must be a Word article in these somewhere, they opened me up to so much music outside of the relatively narrow genre of the paper itself.
Of all the writers that ever graced the pages, Danny Baker will always be number one for me, he never ceased to bring a smile.
I still buy a copy once a year, to read about Glastonbury, and see how far the standards have fallen. This year I can even make out my hat in the full page photo of the Pyramid Stage crowd for Rolf! So after 5 decades I finally made it to the once revered pages!