I thought it couldn't get much worse than the last series, but it has. The Amstell idiot manages to make the most gormless 'guest' look like a polymath renaissance genius, and the gormless 'guests' almost always have less to say than the jobbing actors in the line-up section. The show is waaaaaaay past its sell-by date, and long overdue the axe.

He's better than Lamarr who was just, clearly bored. It's alright - it's better than some stuff but not essential. Bob Mortimor is always welcome. Vegas' wit is correlated to his girth it would appear.

I thought he was fine. I suppose it depends on how you feel about the approach of getting laughs by picking on certain individuals who may sometimes be easy targets, but then although these targets can be a bit dim they are usually fair game since they often take themselves too seriously and Amstell tends to say what we are all thinking - ie x is a bit of a twat, not that that's his whole act. And I found it funny I have to say. Bill Bailey is great too. Not so keen on the Boosh guy - is he on it all the time now? Not sure.

The format is really tired though, the same old elements each week: the intros, the id parade - yawn. The thought of changing presenters each week sounds bad. I wonder is it all scripted the same as if nothing's changed - like on Have I Got News For You, where you realised that it had nothing to do with the presenter (Deakin) as he didn't really write it, he just read it? Amstell seemed pretty natural and spontaneous to me though, in fact I preferred him to Lamarr also. Lamarr was sometimes not funny but just nasty.