Entertainment For Lively Minds
My Name is Earl Slick. I Play Guitar.
Posted by Sheev on 18 September 2010 - 8:40am.
You can keep your Marrs and Greenwoods and Malmsteens.
Earl's the man. The numero uno axewrangler.
Sterling Campbell is a shit-hot skinsbeater. Gail Ann Dorsey is the coolest chick and the best bassist on the planet
Look, Station to Station is the best album ever and "Stay" the best track. Even Maconie thinks so.
As for old As Usual. He just is.
Put this on big screen. Put the cans on and play LOUD.
Enjoy
- More from Sheev.
- Login or register to post comments










Live at the BBC Radio Theatre?
Correct me if I'm wrong but this looks very like the Bowie at the Beeb gig from 2000 (is it really that long ago?) which I'm surprised was never made available on DVD.
For some reason, presumably commercial, two of the tracks on the CD were omitted from the live performance. I know because I went to the trouble of making a CD of it only to see its commercial release later!
Superb
Band are kicking.
A most un-American guitarist
I always felt that Earl Slick was a member of a very select group of "classic" American guitar players - Joe Walsh is in there too, as is Bruce Springsteen when he plays a solo - whose distinguishing feature is that they don't sound like Americans when they play.
Their "comfort zone" is right on the edge of control, and so just a whisker away from losing it completely - an approach I associate more with our side of the Pond than the Cousins'.* It's exciting. This is why, for example, I'll always opt for a drop of Rory over a chug of Stevie Ray.
There's quite possibly a sports analogy in here somewhere: their ultra-analysed, tightly planned, yard-at-a-time game versus our hit-the-ground-running-and-see-what-happens approach. And rather than the gridiron grind of most of his compatriots that has you nodding in admiration, Earl Slick's playing is more the mazy dribble that leaves you breathless.
[*Jimi Hendrix, of course, was perhaps the most anarchic of all of them, and he was American. Or was he?]
Spot on Arch
It's all about texture.
The guitar sounds like a swathe, a swash, a daub, A sheer schmeer kind of thing. Van Gogh as opposed to Franz Hals.
Although, that ability to play on the edge of madness is rooted in absolute technical mastery. Hendrix being a good parallel. Or Coltrane. Or Joyce as a writer. Or Maradona to give a sporting analogy.
this deserves its own thread
I want to ask several questions and get a consensus on where Todd Rundgren fits in all of this
Ask 'em, James,
ask 'em...
dunno where to start
title, question, belief etc...
An amazing performance...
The whole band is just so on top of things on that tune.
Why oh why
has he not been knighted yet? Or even a damehood. A national treasure.
Because
he refused it.
A great version of possibly
the greatest song ever recorded...
Not long for the deluxe version of StoS now!
Lovely performance...
but what was the Dame thinking about with that haircut?
So true, tronco
Who want’s an American guitar player who sounds ‘American’ when you can have one who sounds ‘classic’. Like that terrible Duane Allman, always sounding so ‘American’ and ‘planned out’ and ‘in control’. There he is teaching that Clapton feller about the guitar when Eric’s so good (and edgy) already.
I guess by extension an Engerlish guitar player who doesn’t sound Engerlish must be a very good thing, also? HJH had a good player, a bit quiet he was, who took all his licks from that rotten Perkins (but I’ve always considered HJH to be quite a good ‘American’ band so perhaps that cancels it out).
And what percentage of those american guitarists have passports? I think there’s the start of a whole new thread for you here, joven.
Are you EVER going to post something without
being snippy about another poster? Your sarcasm is becoming more than a little wearing.
Stimpers
I often post in an objective manner. You choosing not to acknowledge that is not something I can do anything about. The Bring Back Hanging post got me 6 up arrows. My parents are going to be so proud when I tell them. I just have a thing about waterbrained bigotry. Like some people have a thing about, ooh, I don't know, Phil Collins, say.
PS; you ought not SHOUT. It's really quite common.
sort it out
guys :(
Blimey.
You really do see bigotry in the most unlikely places, don't you, MAM? Life must be bloody exhausting.
"THAT GUY JUST SAID HE PREFERS SAUSAGES TO BURGERS! ANTI-AMERICANISM!"
"WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU FLY BRITISH AIRWAYS? WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH AMERICAN AIRLINES, YOU SWINE?"
"GAH! DON'T YOU PEOPLE REALISE THAT SHAKESPEARE WAS FROM DELAWARE?"
Chill. Saying Earl Slick plays in a British way isn't "bigotry". Nor is saying that you prefer British guitarists, a a rule, to American ones. Park yer bloody hobby horse.
Thanks, IB.
Thought it needed saying, but just couldn't be bothered...
Whatever you do...
...don't mention Lennon's "bigger than Jesus" debacle and the US reaction to it.
I mentioned it once, but I think I got away with it. ;-)
Crikey
You're missing my point, oso, and all caps exaggeration does little to further yours. I was replying to someone who had previously displayed unreconstructed bigotry (the clue’s in the passport). And in my far too many years here on this island it never ceases to amaze me the way it inevitably seems to come down to race. Maybe it should cease to amaze me but it doesn’t.
Bloody AmericanMates
going round acting like the world's policemen etc........
?
That makes no sense.
Gents
If you're going to start on the accusation/bickering/sarcasm/blame stuff again, please take it to e-mail.
Thanks.
"Unreconstructed bigotry"?
"Race"? "The clue's in the passport"?
Does anybody understand what he's on about?
Understand? Kinda
Didn't you once refer to the large proportion of US citizens without passports*? (Writes a British citizen without one himself. Mine expired a while back, and I haven't yet needed a new one. Don't get about much, me.)
I'm not sure how that simple statement of facts makes you a bigot, mind, reconstructed or otherwise. Nor indeed how any discussion of the differences between the US and other parts of the planet somehow equates to racism.
Seems it's just his little way...
*If I've mis-remembered this, sorry Archie...and I'm lost, too!
Rory rather than Stevie
Well, I think Archie's observation has struck a chord here - could that concern with control (rather than the expectation of unpredictability) be why I have always preferred Gallagher over Vaughan? There is much to think on here...
On another aspect: can anyone tell me to whom 'tronco' and 'joven' refer? And what they mean?
Yours in bafflement,
"Mate/buddy" and "young'un" respectively
(But I had to look them up.)
Something tells me MAM was being ironic in at least the first case. And I think he was addressing them to Archie V.
Excellent
I have to say that is a cracking band. Earl on fine form as you say in the OP. I saw him once with Ian Hunter back in the day and he was excellent then too. Who is the Nile Rogers-esque rhythm player? Carlos Alomar?
That's a mighty
pretty guitar.
According to
my ,erm,copy of the gig the band is this,Twangathon.
David Bowie: vocals and acoustic guitar;
Earl Slick: guitar;
Gail Ann Dorsey: bass;
Mark Plati: rhythm/acoustic guitar;
Mike Garson: keyboards;
Sterling Campbell: drums;
Holly Palmer: backing vocals;
Emm Gryner: backing vocals.
he knows how to pick em
Mike Garson alone is a stone cold genius
Mike Garson
Speaking as a ventriloquist, I loved his work in Madness*.
*I know, it's a joke.
I hate to throw...
...the virtuoso cat among the indie pigeons (or something), but those three names really don't belong in the same post code, let alone the same sentence. Compared to Yngwie Malmsteen and his otherworldly chops, Greenwood and Marr are but bedroom strummers and I'm sure they'd be the first to admit it.
Now, before I get lynched, let me say that I don't particularly enjoy Malmsteen's work, in fact I'd declare most of it to be as boring as bat shit. But like it or not, he is a total master of his instrument while the other two are virtually babes in arms by comparison.
While taking nothing away from the sterling work they have done with the Smiths and Radiohead respectively, neither men are great guitarists in the true sense of the word.
As for Earl Slick, he's a fine journeyman player and did some great work with Bowie and others, but perhaps the less said about Phantom, Rocker & Slick and their none-more-80s hit Men Without Shame the better.
(and check out the two dumbfucks introducing the clip!)
A total master of his instrument? Pah!
Sorry, mojo, but that's bumwash, is that. The ability to play hemi-demi-semiquaver runs at forty thousand beats per minute is indicative of being a master of the ability to play hemi-demi-semiquaver runs at forty thousand beats per minute. No more, no less. It would never occur to him to come up with How Soon Is Now? or Just. He couldn't do it. Ergo, he's not a master of his instrument.
Shredding is just musical cup stacking. (YouTube it). Malmsteen might be a useful technician, but Noel bleedin Gallagher is a better guitarist. It's all about the musicianship, not the technique. (Marr and Greenwood, btw, are great technicians too. What makes them great is that they CAN, but choose not to.)
Hey, I'm with you...
...regarding the utter pointlessness of shredding. In fact, virtually the only player of that entire genre to find a permanent home in my collection is Steve Vai, mainly because he clearly learned a lot during his time with Frank Zappa and it's reflected in his own albums.
Clapton knows, I'm not here to defend Malmsteen, but having seen him live, I can report that shredding is not all he does. Well, er, it's nearly all he does, but he can also turn his hand to regulation heavy rock and I can confirm he also does a mean blues.
By contrast I've witnessed Johnny Marr playing with both the Cribs and Bert Jansch and I have to say I was underwhelmed by his playing on both occasions. He's a great songwriter, but an exciting guitarist he's not.
Loth as I am to repeat myself
http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/content/my-name-earl-slick-i-play-guitar#c...
But surely playing an instrument and writing music
are two different things?
Very few of the orchestral musicians I know write anything but most of them can play the strings/mouthpieces off their instruments.
I consider myself a pretty good drummer but wouldn't know where to start with writing a structured piece of music.
Oh dear...
Everything about that clip is wrong. From the missing links introducing it to the questionable clothes and useless music. Truly horrible. I shall now excise it from my memory.
well...
I liked it
Damn you Massive!
you've made me listen to Station To Station again. I count it lucky it ain't a double album or I'd never get time to listen to anything else
Mike Garson
Stone cold genius?
Leaves me completely cold, his technique seems to be to the piano equivalent of shredding. It seemed to work on Aladdin Sane but he plays the same way thirty odd years later.
As for guitarists Mick Ronson did an excellent job of arranging some of Bowie's earlier stuff and was by no means a one trick pony.
What a band!
I don't have much of Bowie's stuff but if that's on Station to Station then that's where I'm going.
Isn't that what everyone wants to do? Play guitar like that in a band like that?
Cos I bloody well do.
Cameron Crowe
in Saturday's Times wrote:
"Decades later, S to S still feels like a message from the future."
He added
"Long behind now, S to S still resonates with purpose and delicacy. One of his most personal albums, it's a diary of a life saved, set to a soundtrack of vision and soul. A masterpiece disguised as a snapshot."
Take the trip to the station. You won't be disappointed Beezer.
Encouraged
I'll pop to Fopp this week and see if it's on the racks. I'm sure it will be (like some here I prefer the hard copy rather than the mp3 if I know I can get it cheap). I've had a brief Spotify and it's a cool and calculated sound.
In short, thanks for posting something so eye-opening.
Am I right in thinking this performance isn't commercially available on DVD? (chews tie in disbelief).