Mixed reviews

The phrase 'mixed reviews' generally infers that an album is less than brilliant. The Guillemots new album Red had 'mixed reviews' - personally I think it is excellent and has a cutting edge somewhat lacking in most new stuff released these days. They dare to be different and maybe they have confused the critics because they havent stuck to the same formula as their last album.We rely on critics to point is in the right direction but they are known to retract their original comments from time to time - take for example Dexys Dont Stand me down - universally panned at the time of release, mysteriously it is now a masterpiece.
What other albums are out there that are significantly better than the 'mixed reviews' they received.

Exile On Main Street...

didn't exactly set the hacks running to their typewriters with superlatives aplenty upon release, but now it's regarded as an all-time classic by many.

Patrick Crowther | 22 April 2008 - 6:01pm

Replicas

By Gary Numan is a classic example. The music journos hated it but it's now enjoying a rennaissance of popularity thanks to Sugababes, Basement Jaxx etc and he's touring a show where he performs the whole thing.

Niks | 22 April 2008 - 6:36pm

Talk Talk's Spirit of Eden

Talk Talk's Spirit of Eden is slowly being realised as a classic - despite spending a lot of time in bargain bins the first time round thanks to mixed reviews.

Perversely Oasis's Be Here Now was largely applauded by all music press but then years later history was rewritten and everybody pretends they never liked it.

Me? I like it. Still do. It might even be my favourite Oasis album.

ourmanwhere | 22 April 2008 - 7:00pm

What's The Story

I can only agree. "Be Here Now" isn't that bad at all, I still listen to it now and again. What's The Story received pretty mixed reviews when it was released, if my memory serves me right.

David Wright | 22 April 2008 - 7:51pm

Morning Glory

was probably the one to get mixed reviews then be re-appraised more positively soon after, appearing in top tens of the year. I suppose the critics were trying to avoid it happening again with Be Here Now, and went too far the other way. You don't see so many 5 star reviews these days.

Sven | 22 April 2008 - 8:05pm

Magic

Arcade Fire's last album received a few five stars, but I think it's more of a four. Can only listen to them when in the mood. Springsteen's Magic scooped a few five stars as well.

David Wright | 22 April 2008 - 8:17pm

Red

I agree about Guillemot's latest - packed full of tunes and ideas. Reviews I read were good though, but then I've only read a few.

Other mixed reviews then re-appraised:

Bowie - Low. Now thought to be one of his best.

Lou Reed - Berlin. Initially maligned now supposedly classic. This is meant to explain his hostility to music press. Personaly I rate it but for me his best work was with Velvet Underground.

These two would be case of critics being thrown by changes of direction I guess.

Sven | 22 April 2008 - 8:28pm

Don't Stand Me Down

Was actually a masterpiece from day one. The mystery is why those who were paid to review music for us took their ears off the ball.
The great thing about Dexys was that those who knew, knew from the off.

Fetch the ladders I need to get off my high horse.

Mr Drayton | 22 April 2008 - 9:59pm

I seem to remember

"Don't Stand Me Down" getting quite good reviews. It was the public that gave it the bum's rush, not the critics. That would fit the pattern: it's more likely that critics overpraise lousy or average records than ignore or dismiss great ones.

Richard Lowe | 23 April 2008 - 6:20pm

Mezzanine

Massive Attack's mighty sonic cathedral of sound was greeted with some fairly indifferent reviews on its release, but within a few months the past was being hastily rewritten. Either Q or Mojo gave it a lukewarm reception, and three stars, but then gushingly included it in their "Best Of The Year" feature a few months later.

Paul Vincent | 23 April 2008 - 8:56am

'Be Here Now'...

...that's the all time classic example of reviewers back-tracking. Similar issues happened when Razorlight's second album was given 8/10 by NME when it came out then got voted 'worst album of the year' in the same year and Coldplay's 'X And Y' got near unanimous praise and yet now, it seems like few have got a good word to say about it.

I remember when Radiohead's 'Kid A' came out the reception wasn't exactly uniformly glowing at the time; Mojo's Jim Irvin was particularly unimpressed. This one has now been acclaimed to the high heavens but I still personally feel that it's nowhere near 'OK Computer' or 'The Bends'.

Magazine's 'Secondhand Daylight' got slagged by Garry Bushell for being something like 'a return to the 70s progressive lie' (because the Oi! stuff was so much more progressive, wasn't it Garry?) but I think it's a brilliant album- 'Permafrost', 'The Thin Air/Back To Nature' and 'Feed The Enemy' are still amazing to my ears.

I also sometimes wonder whether I'm the only person that genuinely thinks Yes' 'Tales From Topographic Oceans' is so much better than the endless battering it takes from music journalists; it's not even close to being Yes' weakest.

JJ | 23 April 2008 - 9:05am

OK Computer

is a reverse example for me. Critically lauded but I cant listen to it. For me Radiohead ceased to become important after The Bends - guess I had better put me tin hat on!!

Steve Turner | 23 April 2008 - 6:09pm

Films are exactly the same

I just finished reading "Rebels on the Backlot" about young film-makers at the end of the 90's.

The book tells in some detail the tortured process involved in getting a handful of movies to the screen.

One of them was "Fight Club" according to the book the initial reviews were almost universally hostile. However by the end of the year it appeared on most "Best of the year" lists. The appraisal went from "THIS is what society's come to?" to "This IS what society's come to."

I'm only guessing but I think some critics may have been shamed by the reaction their reviews got. People probably said to them, "You just did not get it, did you?"

No one wants to appear out of touch. Especially since it's their job to be in touch.

Critics are given way too much credit. If life is like one big school with principals, head teachers, committees, prefects, bullies, victims, concerned parents etc, then critics are just the lollipop ladies standing outside. Stop, go, stop, go.

Cookieboy | 23 April 2008 - 10:43pm