Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Michael Jackson does not appear to be joking

Sam Fiddian's picture

Vanity Fair currently have a piece about Michael Jackson’s aborted auction, with a gallery of some of the stuff that was due to go under the hammer:

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/culture/2009/05/01/dont-stop-til-you-ge...

With regards the content, I can’t do better than the description on the VF site. I assume I’m not the only one thinking, “You’ve got to be kidding.” Or something slightly more colourful.

Most things that appear in the media about Jackson seem to be somewhat disturbing – even the more pedestrian material (details of concert ticket sales, etc) is tinged with the feeling that there’s something wrong here. The power of history and all that.

I remember reading a report that said Jackson’s financial problems stemmed from the fact that he was a millionaire that lived like he was a billionaire. The stuff that was up for sale would suggest a more complex problem – a breathtaking self absorption with few parallels and no restraint. What drives a man to commission paintings like these?

My own take on Jackson is that he found himself surrounded by people telling him he was wonderful, he started believing them and eventually went on to get rid of anyone who didn’t tell him what he wanted to hear. Regardless of the truth of the molestation accusations, don’t you think there’d be someone in his organisation that might say, “Ah Michael, do really think having the kid in your bedroom is a great idea?” With no-one to keep him grounded and everyone protecting him from anything that might disturb Planet Jackson, he’s just spun off into another plane of reality.

But the basic question: How does someone (anyone?) get this way? Can we even pretend to analyse a man that is this far gone?

0

What a waste...

...is the overwhelming feeling about MJ. From late Jacksons to (just about) Bad he was absolutely electric - a genuine once in a generation talent. Some sporadic sparks since then but essentially a busted flush. Maybe, as DH mentioned in a recent column about our expectations of our heroes, it was too much to ask for him to repeat, or even surpass, his peak years. All that was left was the Howard Hughes show.

0
DougieJ | 4 May 2009 - 12:33am

Michael Jackson's big problem....

...is that unlike most people who ascend to that level of celebrity he never had a manager. He had people he employed to manage him but that's a different thing. As soon as they started to point to his bank statements he got rid of them. And he's also quite breathtakingly vain, even for a superstar.

0
David Hepworth | 4 May 2009 - 7:53am

Fame, eh?

0
Patrick Crowther | 4 May 2009 - 8:37am

Fame...

...and being a victim of child abuse.

0
Nick White | 4 May 2009 - 9:52am

An unbeatable combination...

for screwing someone up completely.

0
Patrick Crowther | 4 May 2009 - 12:36pm

It's just all so sad

a truly fucked-up story - weird, wondrous, beautiful,monstrous,seen, unseen, known, unknown.

All I know is - it was once like this. My jaw dropped, literally, when first I saw this. It still does.


0
Sheev | 4 May 2009 - 10:00am

He's miming

and waving his feet around. Oh, and apparently knocking out out through the pocket of his keks. Or is it just me?

0
Chris | 4 May 2009 - 11:29am

the crowd are miming too?

is it just me or do the sounds of amazement and abandonment from the crowd seem to start before the they actually start clapping. Good routine an' all that but this seems to have been the sum total of all his ideas which he has re-arranged ad naseum since.

0
Dan Edwards | 4 May 2009 - 12:00pm

He never bettered this...


0
stimpy | 4 May 2009 - 1:22pm
stimpy | 4 May 2009 - 1:25pm

One aspect of this

that intrigues me is how we the listeners "consume" people like MJ. All the while they're making popular music, we regard their odd behaviour as 'eccentric' with all its connotations of harmless silliness. As their popularity moves down the scale, their behaviour is increasingly seen as moving though 'bizarre' to downright 'Whacko Jacko' status.

It seems like a lot of people must have been aware that all was not well but no one wanted to rock the boat. And I suspect that in great part that's because a lot of those people wanted to get rich on his back and had little interest in jeopardising their big payday. Managers, press, record labels, promoters - none want to risk their piece of the action.

So now we've consumed MJ and seem to have emptied the well, all we've got left to do is to ridicule him and gloat at his predicament. Given his history of apparent abuse, given that he was turned into a money-making machine from an early age, given that he has had to live his life completely divorced from reality it's hardly surprising that he doesn't have the life skills we're all lucky enough to take for granted.

And of course, now MJ's old hat, it's Amy. And there'll be another after her. What price our fun and entertainment?

0
Mark JF | 4 May 2009 - 10:21am

The exact same thing

happened to Elvis .. he surrounded himself with 'yes' men : the so called "Memphis Mafia" ... he could have whatever he wanted with no restraints. A lot of it had to do with the death of his Mother. He was doomed from then on.

0
spinoza013 | 4 May 2009 - 11:14am

Vanity of the Bonfire*

Is having a huge oil triptych of yourself being crowned and knighted on your dining-room wall really any naffer or more deranged than having a bullfight poster from Torremolinos with your name on it, as half Britain's households probably do?

Isn't it just a question of scale?

* No, I'm not sure what it means, either. Good headline, though.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 4 May 2009 - 1:30pm
spinoza013 | 4 May 2009 - 3:37pm

Off the scale

One says I went on a cheap package holiday, drank too much and this seemed like a good idea at the time, bit of a larf really.

The other says I am an omnipotent deity armed only with a glove and an unfeasibly buffed up sword.

Jacko wins comfortably on both the naff and deranged scale for me. Unless the bullfighting poster is accompanied by one of those donkeys beloved of early 70s Carry On Up the Costa Brava type comedies.

0
Molesworth | 4 May 2009 - 7:28pm

I bought my bullfight poster from...

...the Vicarious Living catalogue that sometimes falls out of the weekend Guardian. It came with my face expertly Photoshopped onto the head of the bullfighter and is signed by a distant relative of Ernest Hemingway.

0
backwards7 | 5 May 2009 - 10:09am

Just

blame it on the boogie.

Sorry.

0
Black Type | 4 May 2009 - 6:56pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd