Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Michael Jackson (1958-2009)

David Hepworth's picture

I went to bed early last night and so it wasn't until this morning I heard the news about Michael Jackson. I just turned on my phone and as expected there's a bunch of messages from news organisations asking me to come in and fill air with cliches. I can't imagine a huge outpouring of general grief, but then again you never know. It's difficult to summon the usual feelings of affection that are normally called for in a case like this. And not just because of the scandals. There was something about Michael Jackson that struck you as jarringly cynical in the very instant he was making his greatest attempts to appear pure in heart. Even in his first national TV appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show they had to over-egg the pudding of his extraordinary singing by getting him to do a cute intro.


And then they had to pretend that Diana Ross had discovered him, so that a little of the light would reflect on Motown's biggest star. He was, more than any star before or since, the meal ticket for a whole family, most of whom have spent the last thirty years wondering when they can persuade him back on the road to recreate magic moments like this one.


But by then he'd gone out on his own and done what hardly anyone had done before, which was build a solo career bigger than the one he had in a group. Whether it's to your taste or not, records like this one sparked a whole new genre.


In the world out there, far beyond Western Europe and the United States, the territories that we like to think of as the known world in terms of beat music, he was the inventor of pop music and "Thriller" was Year Zero. In the back country of Ethiopia a few years ago I had to explain to an educated man who Elvis Presley was. I didn't have to do the same for Michael Jackson. And for the whole generation of performers who dominate the charts today his fusion of highly choreographed flash and self-dramatising sentiment is what pop is supposed to be.
As ever there will be ludicrous displays of bogus bereavement. As ever the grief should be left to his family. I'm going to make a cup of tea. But I'll tell you what. Somewhere Steven Wells will be laughing.

0

Always in threes

Jackson Saxon and Swells. I read of the latter last night then wondered who'd make the numbers up. Bit of a shock this morning though. Michael Jackson was not name that would be on the celebrity death sweep list in the office. No one can doubt his impact for all the failings. I remember my first ever holiday abroad in 1987. The room below was populated by five lads from Norway who invited us down to party with the classic line "hey you guys, we have beer, we have whiskey and we have Bad by Michael Jackson" How could you resist

0
Brianr | 26 June 2009 - 5:43am

Celebrity Same Day Deaths

It looks like it's time to resurrect my old Rocking Vicar thread: it's sad that Steven Wells, Sky Saxon and even Farrah Fawcett will lose out in the column inches stakes to Jackson. It was very sad when Lee Brilleaux lost his battle with cancer on the same day that Kurt Cobain lost his somewhat shorter battle with himself, and again when Mel Blanc (the voice of Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck and all the Warner Bros Cartoon characters) died the same day as Laurence Olivier. On both occasions it was difficult to find any coverage of the "lesser" act's contributions...

0
Val Jennings | 26 June 2009 - 8:34am

Not the same day, but...

... Mother Theresa's death (5th September 1997) was completely swamped by coverage of Princess Diana's 5 days earlier.

And Frankie Howerd & Benny Hill died within a day of each other, though Hill's body wasn't discovered 'til some days later...

0
Metal Mickey | 26 June 2009 - 9:16am

I was too young to understand...

...but didn't Aldous Huxley and Edith Piaf die within a day of JFK?

0
Ian McGillis | 26 June 2009 - 3:52pm

Benny Hill's agent released Hill's tribute to Frankie Howerd

to the press, not knowing that his client had died first. Michael Jackson was a fan of Benny Hill, or so I have read. Frankie Howerd performed a set at Sydney Opera House the week before its official opening ceremony. I'm just glad there's somewhere I can clear my head of this rubbish before bedtime.

0
Robin Clarke | 26 June 2009 - 10:56pm

As Jacko

was reportedly only contracted to appear onstage for 13 minutes a night at the O2 shows, maybe they could still go ahead, they'd just be 13 minutes shorter, no?

0
Futurenoir | 26 June 2009 - 5:59am

Thriller

Or maybe they do a 12" extended version of 'Thriller' and then he can still meet his 13 minute obligation.

0
chrisf | 26 June 2009 - 1:38pm

King of Pop dead

Was quite shocked when hearing sketchy news late last night, but it was true. Granted he may have been famous for many other things in his life, but theres no denying the massive impact he had in music over the years; Thriller is just an outstanding pinnacle which influenced so many other records afterwards and still sounds fantastic today!

Sad day for music, rest in peace MJ.

0
über-über | 26 June 2009 - 6:06am

Massive

I'm not a big fan, I think the only stuff of his I have is Motown era but he was a massive piece of the pop jigsaw and I think I'll probably remember where I was when I heard the news and how I heard it.

0
JohnW | 26 June 2009 - 6:16am

It is shocking

yet without surprise. Much the same age as me, OK a year younger, I recall the TOTPs with his brothers, Rocking Robin being the song running thru' my head this morning. I could never define myself as a fan, indeed, as he transmogrified from, if you forgive my old fashioned and unpolitically correct phraseology, delightful picaninny to awkward Frankensteins monster, he became increasingly ridiculous to my eyes. I couldn't stand the yelps and the crotch hugging yet couldn't look away, secretly adding all those golden period songs to my i-pod, Thriller, Billie Jean, Don't Stop etc etc etc. A ridiculous latterday figure, but yes, was so that other southern boy made good, alluded to above in Davids eulogy, alongside whom only the truly miserable would deny him a place.
Medication related heart attack they are today saying..... How much indemnity insurance must thease american showbiz medics have? If I killed as many patients as do they seem to with their medication...... Or is this, as I suspect, merely euphemism?
Maybe he did just stop when he had enough.

0
Retropath2 | 26 June 2009 - 6:43am

The media are thrilled

The media response has been predictably over-the-top.

When the news broke at about 10:45pm on Radio Five, excitable young radio pup Richard Bacon spent the next 2 hours engaging in the most absurd sweeping generalisations, exaggerations and purile comparisons.

This was, we were repeatedly told, a 'JFK' and/or 'Diana' moment. I suspect that if a caller had compared Jackson's death to 9/11 or the fall of the Berlin Wall, Bacon would have gone with it. (I suppose if you are going to dedicate over two hours of national public service broadcasting to tabloid exaggeration and sentimentality, you are going to be reluctant to talk the story down.)

The fact that Thriller has sold over 40 million copies was held to be 'very significant'. The lasting cultural significance of the album genuinely escapes me. The idea that high sales must (simply must!) be more than financially significant is widely asserted - but rarely argued.

When was the last time you read or heard a contemporary musician say they were inspired/influenced by Jackson? I can't think of any.

Elvis made black music for white kids and then middle-aged housewives. So did Jackson.

0
Melbourne Mike | 26 June 2009 - 6:45am

I'm a little surprised by this

Because I'm always amazed by how often Michael Jackson is mentioned as an influence, especially since all the legal shenanigans. In the world of dance, pop, modern R&B etc., he was the biggest influence, and always seemed to me to be duly credited by musicians.

0
Fraser Lewry | 26 June 2009 - 8:09am

Love him or loathe him,

but Michael Jackson was one of the biggest popstars ever. Hugely influential, in terms of music, presentation, the dancing, and the marketing. Just watch any number of chart/pop or RnB performers and see his influence there. The videos; and those sales of Thriller are important for a huge reason, that means there was a copy of Thriller in homes all over the world.

I can remember when it came out and everybody I knew had a copy.

In terms of music as an influence he's definitely up there with The Beatles. They pretty much defined the ideal for a singing songwriting guitar band and how that ideal is viewed in the world around it, and I'd say MJ did the same for the single performer.

I'm no fan, but anybody who thinks otherwise needs their brain checking. The Beach Boys more of an influence than Michael Jackson? You're completely off your tree.

0
SimonL | 26 June 2009 - 9:23am

No musicians influenced by MJ?

Well, there's Brian Harvey for starters, Peter Andre, Justin Timberlake, the Black eyed Peas - you know, the greats.

0
cathtrish | 26 June 2009 - 12:30pm

Is it possible that

a well-known figure in popular culture can die and not be eligible for instant canonisation?

I'm not disputing his talent, but there's no doubt he wasted what he had and became something far less than he should have been. For the most part, entirely by his own hand.

Tragically, he won't be the last to go down that path. I feel sorry for him, but not enough to hide my cynicism at the behaviour of most of the media - I think David got it about right. And the spectacle that will surround his death will be far more aawful than anything we could imagine.

0
Sam Fiddian | 26 June 2009 - 7:01am

rather harsh I reckon

I for one feel sorry for the bloke

Yes fame and stardom was his , he blew it all away ,health, money ,credibility ,morals probably etc.

Can't help thinking the only time he ever felt happy was dancing and singing and for so many years he never did that.

Reckon he was happy - from childhood onwards.Of course not. And now he is dead at a mere 50.

0
Junior Wells | 26 June 2009 - 7:09am

The cynicism storm

After the plastic surgery, the wives & kids, the oxygen chamber, the skeleton of the Elephant Man, the "allegations", the bankruptcy and the comeback-that-never-was, the media will be all over this like nothing since 9/11... be prepared for the tell-all biographies, the abused kids coming out of the woodwork, the re-release programme, the new album...

Me, I just hope that amazing little boy who sang "I Want You Back" is at peace.

0
Metal Mickey | 26 June 2009 - 7:09am

That last line

Is exactly how I feel. Maybe there are more important things in life than money and fame after all?

0
Ola Claesson | 26 June 2009 - 9:04am

Here Here

Some perspective in this. If you strip away all the melodrama and just listen to the songs. Just watch his performance. You have to admire the musician; mourn the man.

0
Stevenson | 26 June 2009 - 9:02pm

You summed my feelings up perfectly, David

He was undoubtedly a great singer with some classic musical moments. Some of the Jackson 5 and early solo stuff is perfect pop. For me, however, his music was overshadowed by his lifestyle. I know he wasn't convicted for anything he was accused of, but if you follow the old maxim "there's no smoke without fire", with Michael Jackson there was an awful lot of smoke.

0
Handsome.P.Wonderful | 26 June 2009 - 7:18am

It's almost a relief. . .

that he's dead, from a purely musical point of view. Because for me this morning, all the chaff about Bubbles and Bahrain and Berlin balconies and what-not has blown away, and I've just found myself remembering the last true Autotune-free voice in pop.

With luck, the legend will be all about this:


Schmaltz that sends the tackyometer off the scale? Check. Cynical audience manipulation? Check. But it's also the absolute antithesis of sucky singing, and you can't say that about many pop stars these days. About any, even.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 7:52am

Awesome!

Alliteration Archie.

0
Stuart Graham | 26 June 2009 - 7:59am

Who's this old hack..

..they've dragged onto radio 4?

0
Jim M | 26 June 2009 - 7:20am

Mark Ellen is in studio on Radio 4 now...

commenting on Michael Jackson

0
kbhr | 26 June 2009 - 7:21am

It's strange..

..hearing him talk seriously!

0
Jim M | 26 June 2009 - 7:23am

I can't say I ever "got" the adult Michael Jackson

But I guess I'm just too old. The people now in positions of power in the media, politics and generally were probably the age to have danced to Thriller in their teens and twenties. This is why we'll see staggeringly over-the-top coverage for the next few days.

I think it's who you grew up with. I was genuinely sad when Keith Moon died. And John Lennon (since a little reevaluated). Michael Jackson? Loved his work with the Jackson 5 and can see he turned out some good tunes later on. But, by and large, he passed me by.

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 26 June 2009 - 7:36am

Mark Ellen....come off it!!!

Mark Ellen has asserted on The Today Programme (in the 8:10 slot - what on earth is Radio 4 thinking of!!!) that Jackson is among the ten most significant recording artists of all time.

Ok Mark, which of the following ten would you remove from this list and replace with Michael Jackson?

1. Bob Dylan
2. Van Morrison
3. The Beatles
4. Frank Sinatra
5. The Beach Boys
6. Stevie Wonder
7. David Bowie
8. Bob Marley
9. Miles Davis
10. Bruce Springsteen

Let's all take a deep breath, calm down, and try to avoid saying things we will be embarrassed by in a few months time....

0
Melbourne Mike | 26 June 2009 - 7:36am

Van Morrison

Who he? And where's Bonio?

0
Beany | 26 June 2009 - 7:44am

Sorry Mike, he's actually completely right.

Maybe not significant to jaded musos like us, which, to be logging into this on a day by day basis, we clearly all are, to some degree or other. We are anything but typical, with our knowledge, tastes and, often, love for the arcane and obscure. The average punter, whether the mythical man on the clapham omnibus, the ethiopian mentioned by David or kids on the street in Shanghai, will all be familiar with "Wacko Jacko". He is one of the few musicians whose name will be known to both our parents and our children, for whatever the reason, sometimes even the music. Dylan, the Beatles and Sinatra may seem utterly ubiquitous icons to us and "our", if you are an averge demographic of this site, generation, perhaps even some of the other names, but ask some youngsters to hum one of their tunes or say something interesting about any of them and you may get a surprise.
Like him or loathe him, he was very very very well known.

0
Retropath2 | 26 June 2009 - 7:46am

significantly well-known

I was working in a crowded office in Westminster when I heard that Joe Strummer died. I was the only person present who had heard of The Clash.

This morning I walked into my office in North East Beijing and *everyone* asked me: "Have you heard the news? Michael Jackson is dead."

There just haven't been that many people, let alone music artists, who enjoyed the same kind of world-wide recognition as Michael Jackson. Maybe Madonna?

0
James EB | 26 June 2009 - 12:50pm

North East Beijing?

What's the weather like? Sunny & hot in North West Bolton...

Last night will turn out to be one of those "do you remember when you heard Michael Jackson died" moments, as with Elvis & John Lennon but not (sadly) with George Harrison & Kurt Cobain.

I was just getting excited because it was exactly 6 months to Christmas...

0
Beany | 26 June 2009 - 3:24pm

It may well be one of those moments

but, in a year's time, my answer will be

"No idea mate, sorry. To be honest I'd forgotten he'd died"

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 3:57pm

Hmmm

I'm trying to think of the contributions Bowie, Morrison, Springsteen and The Beach Boys have made to dance and black music, but I suspect it's negligible - whereas Jackson was probably the biggest influence on both in recent history. Flawed? Yes. Inconsistent? Sure. To my taste? Only occasionally. But significant? He's right up there, without any shadow of doubt.

0
Fraser Lewry | 26 June 2009 - 8:02am

Absolutely

Without his ballads, no boy bands. Without his stage shows, no Madge or Kylie. Without his rhythms, no dance music.

I'm finding it hard to think of anyone more influential over the last 30 years.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 8:11am

Come again?

What is this dance music that was influenced by Michael Jackson? Having a producer who was lagging way behind Kraftwerk hardly makes him a musical giant. Depeche Mode have had more influence on dance music than Michael Jackson.

0
Albert Edward | 26 June 2009 - 8:38am

Sorry...

That's just rubbish

0
Six Dog | 26 June 2009 - 9:33am

And?

That's it, is it? "Rubbish". At least I had the decency to show some working out. No, I'm sorry, but from disco to house and techno, dance music has happened without any significant contribution from Michael Jackson. To say that there would be "no dance music" without him is just piffle.

0
Albert Edward | 26 June 2009 - 9:54am

I genuinely believe it

After disco died, people didn't dance to "Autobahn" or "Trans-Europe Express", much as you might kid yourself they did; they danced to "Billie Jean" and "Wanna Be Starting Something".

MAW, for example, are inconceivable without the influence of the MJ/QJ albums of the Eighties. In interviews Louie Vega always says that "Off the Wall" was the first record he bought, and with good reason.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 10:08am

Yup........

I did start typing a long winded response with justification. But life's too short. You lost me, and presume most, with the words "Depeche Mode".

0
Six Dog | 26 June 2009 - 10:10am

I could be taking the wrong end of the stick

but I Flappy Mong was when I went. Lacking in taste I thought (although I'll retract if Mong is your given surname).

0
Leedsboy | 26 June 2009 - 10:23am

The name...

.. is extrapolated from a Mark E Smith quote. I apologise if it causes you offence, it's honestly not meant to.

Mr Waite, try this: http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:knfyxqqgldfe

Mr Valparaiso, I'll happily accept that MJ influenced MAW, but I think it's far too peripheral to support your original statement (which, incidentally, would work just fine if you substituted the word dance for pop).

0
Albert Edward | 26 June 2009 - 10:47am

But...but....but.....

The original DM "sound" was nicked lock stock and barrell from Kraftwerk. Then given a pop sheen by the Human League, Numan and Soft Cell who all, imo, did it better. DM's later influence, as far as I can see stretches to a little bit of Trent Reznor, Manson and MCR. Can't see Frankie Knuckles or Derrick May strutting in the Chicago Warehouses in 1985 to People Are People......!

Don't get me wrong, I like DM (esp Speak and Spell and Some Great Reward) but just cannot see a sphere of influence there in the same way that MJ (who I don't like as much as DM) did.

But, as ever, what's good for the goose is not always good for the gander!

0
Six Dog | 26 June 2009 - 11:37am

Thank you...

...for at least acknowledging that I might have a point, Mr Waite.
I wouldn’t imagine the influence of DM extended much beyond the initial spark of ‘what’s that sound coming out of our radio’, but it’s a fact that it was picked up on by the three Detroit originators, the Belleville trio of Juan Atkins, Kevin Saunderson and Derrick May. I’ve quoted this from a bio online: “With May having met Atkins and Saunderson at high school, the trio hung out in the early eighties and slowly begun developing their own scene. Influence and inspiration came from imported European electropop crystallised by the likes of Kraftwerk, Depeche Mode, New Order and Nitzer Ebb and a fascination with synthesisers… During this period Atkins had introduced May and Saunderson to AlvinToffler's book "The Third Wave", which tells of 'Techno Rebels as agents of the Third Wave', their assigment being to help advance new stages of civilisation by utilising the skills and characteristics of both man and machine with equal placing, but with man still in control. These are the roots of 'techno'.”
Meanwhile, in Chicago, in the early 1980s, “Underground club DJs like Ron Hardy and radio jocks The Hot Mix 5 played Italo Disco tracks like "Dirty Talk" and the "MBO Theme" by Klein M.B.O., Early B-Boy Hip Hop tracks such as Man Parrish's "Hip Hop, Be Bop (Don't Stop)" and Afrika Bambaataa and the Soul Sonic Force's Planet Rock and Looking for the Perfect Beat as well as electronic music by Kraftwerk; these genres were influential to the Chicago genre of House.”
I’m not saying that MJ has had NO influence on dance music, but it’s just not that profound, and to say it wouldn’t have happened without him is simply wrong. He is incidental to its evolution, a bit player, and I stick by my original statement that DM (not a band I especially like, by the way!) are more important to the explosion of dance music than he is, simply by virtue of being played by the Electrifying Mojo in Detroit in the early 1980s.

0
Albert Edward | 26 June 2009 - 12:13pm

I should define my terms

I didn't mean dance music per se, all of it, in any backwater. I meant the global phenomenon that it became 1995-2005. Without Michael Jackson's push, instead of the heavy-hitting mainstream genre it became, I think it would have faded away with the arse-end of disco and the closure of Studio 54. House and techno would have been limited to a local cult scene in Chicago, New York and Detroit. After disco, it was MJ - not Juan Atkins - who made 4/4 grooves okay to like again.

Yes, in purely musical terms, Prince, for one, has been just as influential on dance music as Michael Jackson. But in terms of getting people onto dancefloors the world over, he could never even come close to competing.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 12:37pm

For many

- read non-Caucasian parts of the world - Prince and Michael Jackson - are the equivalents of Beatles and Elvis.

Not sure who their equivalent of Depeche Mode is.

If your Depeche Mode "single biggest influence" on Dance music ever petition gets to court - you may need Johnny Cochrane to defend you

Oh wait - he's dead too

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 12:44pm

At least do me the courtesy

.. of reading my posts. That is not what I'm saying, is it?

0
Albert Edward | 26 June 2009 - 1:05pm

oh, I've read them alright...

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 3:22pm

But you thought you'd

misquote me anyway. For what purpose? To cause trouble?

0
Albert Edward | 27 June 2009 - 7:02am

Ok

You're like way cooler than me? I'm like you're right, I'm wrong?

You like The Fall *and* Depeche Mode? I don't? I'm like duh! As if!

Oh and I could make a compelling case that the first white artist to be truly accepted by the kind of minority audiences you allude to, and, by extension, the primary influence on the kind of "Dance" you mean as opposed to dancing, the progenitor of bringing together European motorik and Disco syncopation - which led to Techno and House and the other major achievements of mankind you mention - was David Bowie.

Oh and Depeche Mode are unimagineable without him too.

Ok? Mind if I leave you to a Fall/Mode megamix ?

I'm off to listen to The Four Tops

Cheers

0
Sheev | 27 June 2009 - 10:19am

I don't particularly like...

Depeche Mode. Sheesh.

0
Albert Edward | 27 June 2009 - 11:02am

It's 'Sheev'

0
ChaosandMorphine | 27 June 2009 - 1:10pm

Drugs and technology...

(This is in reply to Archie Valparaiso)

It wasn't a case of making it okay to like. MJ didn't have a hand in that and didn't need to. After all, House DJs weren't playing House at first, it was a music that developed on the fly, in the clubs, (Paradise Garage, Warehouse, The Loft) as clubs began using enhanced, bass-heavy sound systems and mixing up electro and The Clash with Sylvester. What took it out of the gay, black and Hispanic niche and to the dancer on the street was the fact that gays, blacks and Hispanics were having a better time because they were up all night listening to music that sounded great on amphetamines and LSD. Added to that you had the the availability of technology that made it possible to create tracks in your bedroom, creating a new generation of producers. All of this was taking place without Michael Jackson's involvement. He was doing something revolutionary, for sure -- the last thing I want to do is detract from his achievements -- but the fact is, his achievements were not in that particular field.

0
Albert Edward | 26 June 2009 - 1:10pm

Surely now.......

This all depends as to your personal taste and classification of "dance" music?

0
Six Dog | 26 June 2009 - 1:31pm

I took it to mean...

...those genres of dance music created since Michael Jackson has been musically active; those he might conceivably have had a hand in creating.

However, judging by Archie's post above about Michael Jackson "getting people on dancefloors", I think he may be referring to wedding discos.

0
Albert Edward | 26 June 2009 - 3:25pm

yeah those benighted fools at

wedding discos enjoying themselves what they need is some "proper dance music" as defined by bedroom dj's and too cool for skool crate botherers and white label dribblers. Can we get some sense of proportion here.

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 3:36pm

I explained what I was referring to

And I still maintain that the globalisation of dance into the whole clubbing/Ibiza/MOS/Pete-Tong-on-Radio-1 "thing" owed rather more to Michael Jackson than to Derrick May.

Where's Joe Muggs when we need him?

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 3:40pm

Oh come on, Archie

I've shown you where you're going wrong with actual evidence and facts and names and places and all you've done in return is surmise: 'I think', I 'maintain that'. Give me a bit more to go on!

0
Albert Edward | 26 June 2009 - 3:48pm

Danny Rampling.

It's his fault. Blame him!

NB - Years back - early 90's at Cream, Derrick May DID drop Don't Stop Til You Get Enough into the mix and the place went crazy. Livened things up after some Beltram bleeps and bongs.

0
Six Dog | 27 June 2009 - 11:36am

Oh come on

As I said above, he had very little affect on me but I can see that he had a huge influence on "music that you can dance to". You must either have a very narrow definition of "dance music" or you are being deliberately perverse.

And, Fraser, can we have another user name amnesty? I think someone needs to change.

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 26 June 2009 - 3:42pm

Influence

"There will never be another talent like Michael Jackson. He was the first live performer I ever saw. I got to see him at Madison Square Garden when I was eight. If not for him, I wouldn't be doing what I'm doing." - Lenny Kravitz

0
Beany | 26 June 2009 - 3:45pm

yes

his influence wasn't all good...

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 3:52pm

Let's remind ourselves...

...that MJ hardly produced a listenable note of music after he stopped working with Quincy Jones. So maybe it's Mr Q we should be holding up as the seminal influence here.

BTW, I've only ever had a middling interest in Depeche Mode, but I certainly do remember the Detroit techno crowd namechecking them with great frequency back in the day. Surprising then and odd-seeming now, sure, but it did happen.

0
Ian McGillis | 26 June 2009 - 5:53pm

He did indeed...

.. have a huge influence on "music that you can dance to" , in the sense that a lot of people have danced to his music. But then a lot of people have danced to the music of The Housemartins and their influence on dance music is negligible, too. It's hardly 'narrow' or 'perverse' to make a distinction. Remind me never to shop at a record shop where you're in charge of the categorisation, Mr M. "Do you have The Lady in Red?" "Yes, you'll find it over there in Dance..."

Anyway, Archie has made it clear that he's not referring to "music that you can dance to", but dance music, the lineage of which goes roughly thus: Disco-Chicago-Detroit-Ibiza-Shoom-Hacienda-The Second Summer of Love-Rave-Trance-Superclub-Peter Tong-Mainstream. I've demonstrated that this culture took place almost wholly without Jackson. So far all I've had to support the counter argument is that fact that Louie Vega likes Off The Wall. I guess there won't be any more evidence forthcoming so I'll leave it there. Thanks for a nice clean argument, chaps! (Sheevmaster excepted).

0
Albert Edward | 27 June 2009 - 7:03am

Cristiano Ronaldo's pink hotpants

Deep breath.

First, your "lineage" contradicts your own argument. If Chicago house and Detroit techno stemmed from disco, where do your bedroom 808s and the Mighty Mode fit in?

Second, I dispute that Atkins, May and Saunderson - the Triumvirate of Tedium[1] - made it all happen. The connections between those Detroit techno pioneers[2] and the mainstream "club scene" from the mid-Nineties to mid-Noughties is tenuous to say the least. The music they made and the scene whose soundtrack they originally provided was and is the equivalent of heavy metal for nerds. It has nothing to do with what most people mean by dancing or "clubbing". Where's their influence on what most clubbers in the Nineties and early Noughties would actually hear - "commercial" (spit, I assume) AKA handbag house? You might as well claim the seeds were sown by Chicory Tip.

The problem here is that you're talking about the development of the technique while I was referring to the development of the culture.

I can still remember the day that I realised the importance of the breakthrough that had been made by Michael Jackson, taking black dance music to places it had never been before. One day, a bloke I worked with came back from lunch with an HMV bag. Inside it was "Off The Wall". His musical tastes prior to this had been exclusively white and pretty mainstream - 10 c.c., later Floyd, Gerry Rafferty, stuff like that. He didn't like soul (Teddy and Marvin being its main exponents then), and he actively despised disco. But he bought "Off The Wall" because he'd heard it by accident and - equally by accident - loved it, purely on its own terms.

Yes, as you say, a club scene had always existed as a backwater (the Wigan Casino all-nighters and so on), but that single record - by a former child star and cartoon character, for crying out loud - made it okay for everybody, including pudgy Spurs supporters like my workmate, to move their bodies, shake their booties and get on down - with no shame, no irony, but simply because it felt good.

So where does this leave our discussion? Well, when it doubt, drag in a football analogy, I always say. If instead of "no MJ, no dance music" I'd said "No Becks, no CR7", your response would have been a litany of technical arguments to refute the claim. "Beckham never did a stepover in his life," you'd say. "Ronaldo is a predatory goalscorer, not a precision crosser". No doubt Puskas and Garrincha would be tossed into the pot somewhere along the line. But that's not what I'd been talking about. I'd been saying that Beckham had set up the figure of the footballer as a marketable brand, worth far more off the pitch than on it. And I'd have been right.

That's why I still reckon that without Michael Jackson, my old workmate would never in his life have got off his arse and danced with Real Girls but would still be nursing his pint, nodding his head sagely at David Gilmour's noodling.

Where is Joe Muggs when we need him?

1. I once went to a party where Juan Atkins was DJ-ing. If ever the concept of joylessness could be encapsulated in a single night, that was it. It'd have been easier to have fun in a bank queue. But I've also seen Frankie Knuckles, David Morales, Roger Sanchez and Laurent Garnier all drop (is that the correct technical term?) a Michael Jackson tune when they knew the time was right. We're talking about two different worlds.

2. Or their successors: Jeff Mills and Plastikman have never bothered the Ministry decks or Radio One playlist overmuch either.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 27 June 2009 - 9:58am

My last word on this...

My lineage doesn’t contradict my argument at all; I’ve explained why above.

The link between the early pioneers and the current club scene isn’t tenuous, it’s direct. Who had the first Techno hit? That would be Kevin Saunderson with Inner City --- the first techno artist to go mainstream. (You’ll find it on any number of Ministry of Sound Anthems or Club Classics albums if that place is your yardstick). At the same time Atkins and May were always staple DJs on the rave scene (it was years before I knew his name was spelled Derrick, because it was ALWAYS misspelled ‘Derek’ on the flyers!). And how many Hed Kandi (and, yes, Ministry of Sound) albums does Rhythim is Rhythim have to appear on before you’ll acknowledge May’s importance. Archie, I adore you, but that sentence is breathtaking in its sheer wrongness.

As for the Detroit second generation’s lack of profile, Jeff Mills has done more Radio 1 Essential Mixes than Laurent Garnier (who I really rate, by the way) and Richie Hawtin is headlining a stage at SW4. Hardly niche stuff.

The development of ‘handbag house’? Well, you’d trace that back to Chicago House and New Jersey garage, the Loft, the Warehouse, the Paradise Garage etc, you throw in the speed and MDMA rush of rave and… bingo! I’ve covered that above also, and no, it had nothing to do with Michael Jackson.

Which just leaves your rather anecdotal Michael Jackson taught the white man to dance argument. Anthony Wilson said the same thing about ecstasy. I agree with him.

By the way, don’t you think it’s strange that in two days and what must have been thousands upon thousands of words written about Michael Jackson, what comes up time and time again is his contribution to pop music, never his contribution to dance music culture? The reason? Because it’s nil. You’ve made a grand statement that’s baseless. You can’t support it, but you won’t stand down from it, which leaves us blowing in the wind, going round and round in circles. I bow out, for good. Next time you hear Strings of Life, think of me.

0
Albert Edward | 27 June 2009 - 11:00am

as summed up by this : (both!)

0
el hombre malo | 27 June 2009 - 11:04am

No, next time I think of

tedious technobabble pseudo one-upmanship spouted by someone with a gratuitously offensive alias, I'll think of you. But not for long.

0
Black Type | 27 June 2009 - 11:52am

In all fairness.

Explained above about the user name. Again, sorry for any offence caused, it's genuinely unintentional. As for the rest, it's called having a point of view, isn't it? Why be so hostile?

0
Albert Edward | 27 June 2009 - 12:20pm

But you don't

seem to be so keen on accepting others' equally valid points of view - and it looks like you're generating quite a bit of hostility all round.

0
Black Type | 27 June 2009 - 12:32pm

I don't know who's right here,

but I'm enjoying the debate.
Some of the comment towards Flappy Mong have been a little hostile - is it because he is new?

0
ChaosandMorphine | 27 June 2009 - 1:25pm

Thank you, it may well be...

..my ill-advised user name, which I chose a long time ago, and for which I've apologised.

Otherwise I hope I've simply argued my case, using examples, without resorting to ad hominem attacks or disparaging remarks.

0
Albert Edward | 27 June 2009 - 1:57pm
stimpy | 27 June 2009 - 2:07pm

Absolutely!

I've said my last on that issue.

I'm onto the 'Why have I generated so much hostility?' conundrum now.

0
Albert Edward | 27 June 2009 - 2:35pm

Oh dear Archie

"Without his ballads, no boy bands. Without his stage shows, no Madge or Kylie."

It seems a bit unfair to blame him for all that.

I thought you liked him?

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 26 June 2009 - 4:00pm

Ho ho

But there's a serious point there: why do we only take into consideration the music we personally like when appraising how influential people have been?

In the grand scheme of things, the influence of the Velvet Underground or The New York Dolls is absolutely bugger all. (Producer, to Lady Gaga: "Hey, Ga, why don't we try a kind of 'All Tomorrow's Parties' feel for this one?")

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 4:13pm

I'd remove....

Van definitely, and put Elvis P in there, I think that he might have made a bit of an impact when he first emerged. Jacko would be in before Bruce I'd say.

0
humphreym | 26 June 2009 - 8:11am

I'd replace Stevie Wonder

from that list.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 26 June 2009 - 8:15am

About half

say no.2 and from 6 down.

0
Leedsboy | 26 June 2009 - 8:32am

This one deserves a thread of its own.

...but for the moment I'd have said that MJ was way above everyone from 4 below (apart from maybe Bowie and, at a push,the Beach Boys).

I grew up with Jackson, loved and hated him in equal measure but always cared what he was up to. There will be very few people in the world who won't know about his death today, which must make him significant on some level...

0
Uncle Monty | 26 June 2009 - 8:43am

Mike he's right

Dont let your own personal preferences get in the way of objectivity. The word is significant - You cant deny that Mr Jackson made a huge contribution to music, even if you dont rate his music.

To answer you question id probably remove Van Morrison or Brucey

0
James Taylor | 26 June 2009 - 9:30am

Er..let's see....

Wonder, Davis, Springsteen, Beach Boys and Van.

0
eddie g | 26 June 2009 - 9:45am

Interesting

Not a woman to be seen...

0
itf | 26 June 2009 - 9:53am

So...

...do you care to nominate one?

0
Ian McGillis | 26 June 2009 - 5:59pm

So...

...do you care to nominate one?

0
Ian McGillis | 26 June 2009 - 5:59pm

Darn those double posts!

Can't figure out how to fix it, either. So while I'm here, a woman for the list, albeit based on a twenty-year projection into the future: Joanna Newsom. (Bet you never thought you'd see her on an MJ thread.)

0
Ian McGillis | 26 June 2009 - 6:04pm

Elvis !

Elvis would have to be on that list.

And if it is "of all time" then Bing Crosby would have a fair shout as the singer whose singing style was perfect for the modern microphones of the time.

0
el hombre malo | 26 June 2009 - 10:29am

but the habitues of this pub can, broadly speaking,

be caricatured as 'middle aged white boys with guitars'.

I suspect the equivalent forum on (say) the Blues & Soul magazine site would have a very different top 10.

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 2:10pm

new

Mike I would replace The Beach Boys with the Teletubbies. The most over rated band in the history of music. Shite of the highest order.All their songs sound the same

0
paintyface | 26 June 2009 - 11:24pm

Van Morrison would come out

Van Morrison would come out, not a fan of Jackson but he is more influential and important. Van, apart from Astral Weeks, not a lot there.

0
woodface | 27 June 2009 - 6:32am

In defence of Mark Ellen on Radio 4!

Melbourne Mike, you are joking right? Replace numbers 2, 5, 9 and 10 for starters from your list. I don't quite understand the appeal of Springsteen (although I like the rest), but you can't deny Jackson's influence and impact was far more important than many of the artists you mention. For large chunks of the world, particularly in the 1980s, Michael Jackson WAS popular music. Let's not forget he was probably the most famous man on the planet. Van Morrison may be the most famous grumpy man on the planet but that will not be deemed to be quite so significant when future historians look back upon the cultural life of the latter part of the twentieth century.

I think it should be said though that this rather spurious desire for validation of/for 'significance' which Radio 4 bases all its arts coverage on risks obscuring more simple (and worthwhile) pleasures that result from listening to Michael Jackson's music. First among these is that, with 'Off the Wall', he became, in my humble, one of only a handful of performers ever to have produced a 'perfect' album. As Peel said in relation to Teenage Kicks, there's nothing about that work that you would want to add to or subtract from.

Also I think the key reason why MJ is probably rightly regarded as the 'greatest entertainer' of his generation is not because of the dancing, the videos, the lifestyle, the songs (important though they all are) but because he was an absolutely fantastic pop singer. In the same way that Jackson's contemporary Prince is the best guitarist I've ever seen, but so good you barely notice it, so the same applies to Jackson's singing. He has that wonderful catch in his vocals (like Smokey Robinson has). It draws you into songs like 'Rock with You' and 'Human Nature'. It's sweet, engaging and matched to the music in a sublime way. There's such a lovely lightness to Jackson's voice; on a song like 'PYT' it bounces with joy in a way it just wouldn't if delivered by a technically superior (but duller) vocalist like, say, Luther Vandross.

Ignoring for the moment whatever real crimes Jackson may or may not have committed, his greatest musical 'crimes' were that (in his prime, and like Sinatra and Elvis before him) he made pop (not rock/jazz/folk), his music was accessible, he danced, he had a sense of humour, he could sing in tune, he paid attention to image, he sometimes sang other people's songs. All things guaranteed to royally get up the nose of music snobs!

My sense is that in 30 years time people in clubs/discos will still be dancing to 'ABC', 'I Want You Back', 'Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough', 'Working Day and Night'... These are fantastic, life affirming tunes. It's a challenge not to dance to them!

0
Kevin Milburn | 28 June 2009 - 10:19pm

Where are you now, Randy Philips?

"He's 50 but he's going to dance his ass off."

0
McKinley60 | 26 June 2009 - 7:41am

The scrpt was written

It was only going to end in tears. The industry will take over now.

Plans to turn Neverland into a museum of his life? Check. Disney to bring back the 3D film Captain Eo in Epcot? Hope so. Souvenir manufacturers on overtime? Check. Rumours about him faking his own death? Started last night. A real appreciation of his early musical talent will increase? Definitely.

Saddest part of it all for me is this is day that his young children will start to lose their own identities and any chance of a normal life - well as normal as could be expected as the children of Michael Jackson. Sure the lawyers are queueing up now to represent them and their mothers. Just keep them away from their grandparents...

0
Beany | 26 June 2009 - 7:42am

Thriller

Not surprisingly, his death was the talk of the tea room at 8am this morning and will be for the rest of the day. It is quite sad news, but I was more upset reading Steven Swell’s last few columns yesterday.Really schocked, he’s the kind of guy you think will be with us for ages. Back to Jacko though, the last time I was out in a club in Scarborough I was having a depressing night, listening to the dire music, until the night was saved and the DJ played “Thriller”, it still sounds great and the night was saved.

0
David Wright | 26 June 2009 - 7:44am

Chocks away in the marketing dept...

Universal/Sony to release a 2CD Best Of do you think? I give it a week...

0
Richie B | 26 June 2009 - 8:03am

Number 1's

is already at number 9 on the iTunes chart.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 26 June 2009 - 8:16am

Sales of single gloves

up by 200% this morning already.

0
Beany | 26 June 2009 - 8:29am

He was a megastar when

megastardom meant something and he filled the Presley/Lennon vacuum. Personally, I didn't care for the music, but having seen many a dance floor fill to 'Billie Jean' et al I guess the guy had something. Also I suspect also that he (or his artistic advisors) laid the foundations for the stadium spectaculars favoured by so many bands and artistes today.

He was never going to pop his clogs at 83 lolling in the corner of Aunt Mabel's Home for Aged Popstars so perhaps now is the best time to bow out. The O2 shows would have been picked over more as a freak-fest than contemporary entertainment and there would invariably have been more allegations of impropriety and financial mismanagement.

We are in for a collective media mope and some syrupy sentimentality (I've already had to turn off Nicky Campbell's sanctimonious waffle after about five minutes this morning), but beyond that let's just look at Jackson as someone with more talent than most of us could aspire to and who failed, as many others have, to withstand the trappings of fame without going totally off his trolly.

Will I rush out and buy some of his music? No. Do I feel sentimental? No. And will my life be affected by his demise? No. In the words of Patrick's post yesterday ... Gimme Shelter

0
Phil Pirrip | 26 June 2009 - 8:32am

Nicky Campbell

Didn't notice any increase in his sanctimonious waffle. Same as it ever was - too bloody much.

0
Leedsboy | 26 June 2009 - 8:50am

True

0
Phil Pirrip | 26 June 2009 - 8:55am

Probably the first comment from a true fan since childhood?

I'm 22 and Michael Jackson was my greatest idol as a child. I admired him so much and was a true fan. His death is impacting on me so much because I had this personal relationship with him in my own way as a child, I loved him and kept loving him as I grew up to be a lover of all music. His relevance in my life changed from a figure to admire to a fantastic musician. Only people who didn't have that respect for him feel the need to discuss his life to the bitter end. I'm just going to listen to Dangerous instead of all this fruitless debate.

0
Esther Terrestrial | 26 June 2009 - 8:34am

Personal relationship?

A figure to admire?
[and most bizarre of all] Dangerous!!!?
Crikey.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 26 June 2009 - 8:38am

Yes

Dangerous is my favourite Michael Jackson album. The problem with all this is, there is too much obligation to justify one's preferences. When I was a child, the music and the man were personal to me (maybe I was a deprived child, had learning difficulties, was abused, orphaned, disfigured, deaf, whatever handicap is required to be a fan of Jacko, you tell me!) and I admired him for reasons which you will contest.
That is is why I've decided I would rather listen to Dangerous than witness these low life people, the media and Uri Gellar feeding off this event in the hope it will give them a chance to bitch so someone will agree with them.
Michael Jackson is dead! Who cares? Get on with your life and let the family, friends and fans mourn.

0
Esther Terrestrial | 26 June 2009 - 9:30am

I'm not stopping anyone from mourning

You're interrupting your own sorrow.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 26 June 2009 - 9:39am

hmm, cross generational cool war?

being an old git, the demise of MJ means little to me - beyond the generalised sadness that he pegged out at 50 which seems way too young BUT i did ask a young mate about the devotion that MJ inspires (a mystery to me) and she said he was like a friend ... maybe this is dangerously Diana-ish, but for alienated, non cool kids growing up in the 1990s (ie born maybe in the back half of the 1980s), here was a child-like, straightforward, preternaturally innocent in his public persona, pop maestro who seemed as alienated and 'outside' as they did ... to an old bloke like me, he was a former pop star with lots of plastic surgery and freaky habits; to a different generation, to a certain strata of a different generation, he was Elvis and Diana all rolled into one (as well as being the first black star to achieve truly global crossover success?) ...

so i think the answer to a lot of the stuff being argued about here is - for the Word demographic - ask your kids

0
Glenbervie | 1 July 2009 - 8:19pm

It's easy to forget that...

... for people in their mid-20's, MJ occupies the same space in their lives as The Beatles do for people in their mid-40's (and I'm going to take a wild guess that's closer to The Word demographic), as in being just too young to appreciate the artist first-hand, but remembering them being everywhere when they/we were growing up, and our older brothers & sisters being mad for them. MJ might not be within Word's sphere of appreciation (all I own is the "Off The Wall" album and a battered 7" of "I Want You Back"), but it's senseless to deny his influence on the Justin Timberlake/Usher/Beyonce generation, even if we don't get it ourselves.

0
Metal Mickey | 26 June 2009 - 9:27am

True Fan

Use the phrase "True Fan" in an internet debate and you've already lost the argument.

0
itf | 26 June 2009 - 9:54am

Heeded

I'm a little new to this. I'm a mere 22 years old, and female to boot.

0
Esther Terrestrial | 26 June 2009 - 10:16am

Just a personal bugbear

I see it a lot and the connotation is "You just don't understand artist x because you're not a big enough fan"

0
itf | 26 June 2009 - 11:04am

I told my 10 year old...

the news when I woke her for school, and about an hour later she said to me,'when I first heard that Michael Jackson had died I was was glad because he won't be able to scare me anymore, but then I thought what if he comes back like one of the dancers from his Thriller video? That's even scarier'! Funny and sad. I prefer to remember him from one of my favourite Jackson 5 songs which also happens to include one of the best bass lines of all time!

0
humphreym | 26 June 2009 - 8:47am

It had to Happen - 1st one I've heard

Whats the difference between Michael Jackson & Sir Alex Ferguson ?

Fergie will be playing Giggs sometime this year....

0
Badlands | 26 June 2009 - 8:52am

I didn't want to be the first, but...

Reports are saying he tripped and fell over a pram.
But Police say it's too soon
to blame it on the buggy.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 26 June 2009 - 9:02am

Or...

Police are treating Michael Jackson's death as suspicious. Apparently they have ruled out the involvement of the sunshine, the moonlight and the good times.

The boogie is still helping them with their enquiries.

0
Paul Hewston | 26 June 2009 - 10:03am

That really is...

brilliant!

0
DougieJ | 26 June 2009 - 2:33pm

Too easy :-)

McDonald's are bringing out the Michael Jackson tribute burger.

50 year old meat between two 7 year old buns.

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 3:14pm

hmmmm

Baby, wash your mouth out...

0
man.of.soup | 26 June 2009 - 9:46pm

Lego

Apparently his family have agreed to donate his body to Lego. He will be melted down and made into blocks so that children the world over can continue to play with him.

0
chrisf | 26 June 2009 - 1:52pm

Good To See . . .

. . . our Foreign Secretary, that nice Mr Miliband, joining in on his Twitter feed re the death of the so-called King Of Pop. Has he really not got anything better to do? Like ordering gunboats or something? Still, good pub quiz detail for years to come. What links Seething Wells, Charlie's Angels and the moonwalk? Fingers on the buzzers etc.

0
barneytabasco | 26 June 2009 - 9:18am

Well said, David.

When so much hyperbole has already been written and said about Jackson, a level-headed appraisal is truly needed.

Fundamentally, Jackson's death is a far bigger loss to the world of celebrity than it ever could be to the world of music.

0
Paolo Meccano | 26 June 2009 - 9:23am

I'd go further, Paolo

I think his death comes as not a loss to the world of music at all, but as the release that was necessary to allow us to appraise it without all the interference from chimps, inappropriate sleepovers and prosthetic nose-tips.

In other words, the music sounds a lot fresher and, yes, better this morning than it did 24 hours ago. It's been nearly 20 years since he made a great record ("Black and White", if you're wondering), during which time he's been 100% celeb and 0% artist. Now, I hope, the tables can be turned.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 9:41am

Yes, I agree

well written David, probably the one and only sensible and balanced bit of writing we are going to see on the subject from now on.

I noticed Max Clifford has already appeared claiming some perverse and twisted link between Jacko and Jade Goody.
Jesus, does that man have no shame?

0
Retro Man | 26 June 2009 - 10:03am

i would debate Black Or White being a 'great' record.

It's good but not great. The Way You Make Me Feel would be my shout from 87 or maybe even Beat It - and I'm not sure they were actually 'great' either.

0
Mr Fade | 26 June 2009 - 10:34am

Listen to it again

I did this morning. It was a revelation. Really. Can you imagine a record like that appearing in the charts now? It'd be number one for 18 months.


(Embedding deactivated. But double-click and it works in a new window.)

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 10:49am

Michael Jackson has earnt his place amongst the greats.

Anyone who says otherwise is an idiot.

Archie's original comment struck me as quite profound.
The clutter has gone (sounds very flippant but not intended) and the songs now stand free and they just shine.

0
Blue Sky | 26 June 2009 - 11:26am

Amongst the greats in what field?

- A great musician - of course not

- A great writer - not at all

- A great singer - he made the best of a limited voice

- A great performer - I'll give him that - but, in his later solo years, he had more in common with West End/Broadway musical theatre than conventional pop/rock music.

- A great shifter of units - undoubtedly

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 3:22pm

Wrong thread

Elvis is over there.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 4:15pm

Indeed...

Did MJ do for black music what Elvis did for 'white music'?

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 4:20pm

Surely

They both did for black music?

0
Leedsboy | 26 June 2009 - 4:34pm

Black or white

It don't matter.

Diddle-iddle dee dee, diddle-iddle dee.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 4:37pm

Eeee...

heee.

0
Patrick Crowther | 26 June 2009 - 4:41pm

You know what I mean :-)

Elvis made black music accessible for a mainstream white audience. He invented white-boy rock-and-roll*

*Yes, I know that's a huge generalisation but that's the headline.

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 4:48pm

So, death not all bad then

'I think his death comes as not a loss to the world of music at all, but as the release that was necessary to allow us to appraise it without all the interference from chimps, inappropriate sleepovers and prosthetic nose-tips.'
Disagree about the music sounding fresher too, I enjoyed it more last time I heard it. Right now I can't separate the freakshow from the songs.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 26 June 2009 - 2:22pm

His death

purely on its own terms is no more or less of a loss than that of any middle-aged man of a heart attack. It happens thousands of times every day.

But we don't discuss those deaths here and nor should we. The loss of the entertainer is what concerns us, and I was just reporting my discovery that I felt "freed up" from all the clutter to be able to concentrate on the art rather than the artist for the first time in 20 years or more.

Maybe it's different where you are, but all the images here have been of moonwalking, not baby-dangling.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 3:21pm

It doesn't come as too much of a surprise

He was very frail and those shows were never going to happen anyway. I'm not a fan, though I don't mind things like Got To Be There, Ben and Rockin' Robin.

I'm not a disco fan.

Someone in our office is one of those queue overnight join in a vigil type of mad fan. Needless to say, he's not in today.

0
Five-Centres | 26 June 2009 - 10:10am

A cod psychologist writes

The interesting thing about the reaction to Michael Jackson‘s death is how some people don’t get what all the fuss is about. This is perfectly understandable. Michael Jackson made disco music. And unless you were going through the mating ritual at “discos” between, roughly, 1975 and 1995, it may be hard to understand why his records resonate so much.
And what weird records they are. Michael Jackson never did “I wanna put on my boogie shoes and boogie with you”. He didn’t do “Good Times”. His records are full of paranoia, insecurity, fear, guilt etc. They’re not much fun. Which may be why, subconsciously, they resonate with people for whom the mating ritual acted out at “discos” wasn’t as much fun as it was cracked up to be either.
Personally, I always breathed a sigh of relief when “Give It Up“ by KC came on.

0
Richard Lowe | 26 June 2009 - 10:14am

Nothing to do with Michael Jackson...

... but “Give It Up“ by KC & The Sunshine Band provides one of my favourite pieces of trivia - why is that record so significant in the UK? (CLUE: End of an era)

I'll give the answer later this afternoon (or confirm if someone gets it...)

0
Metal Mickey | 26 June 2009 - 10:50am

No takers?

OK, it was the last single to reach number 1 in the UK without a promo video being made for it... it was in July 1983, for those who need to know such things.

0
Metal Mickey | 26 June 2009 - 3:35pm

And I wasn't there...

But I can't imagine C.S. Lewis or Aldous Huxley (d. 22 November 1963) got much of a look-in either...

[edit: oops, should be a lot further up the thread]

0
Edward Randell | 26 June 2009 - 10:20am

Although Huxley's death was quoted in song

"She was born in November 1963, on the day Aldous Huxley died"

by Sheryl Crow

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 3:24pm

Cocker

Has anyone interviewed Jarvis yet?

0
McLongWhiteCloud | 26 June 2009 - 10:36am

He's out of our lives...

The news makes me think about John Updike's comment, that celebrity is a mask which eats into the face of the wearer - in Michael Jackson's case that's almost literally true. It seems like a wasted life if only because he showed how it was possible to be so talented, and yet lack any real wisdom, right up to the end. And is anybody really surprised it ended like this? You can't take painkillers like they're smarties and not expect to do some serious damage to yourself. In his own way, he's as much a rock and roll casualty as Elvis or Jim Morrison.

0
Kit Hogue | 26 June 2009 - 10:53am

Archie is spot on further up

Archie is spot on further up the thread - it's nice to see some appreciation of the music, rather than all the usual lurid celebrity nonsense. I loved the idea of all those fans dancing and Moonwalking in LA, because that's got to be a better response than moping around because someone they had no direct link to has passed on. The last thing we need is another Diana-style outpouring of grief.

0
Andrew F | 26 June 2009 - 10:59am

Two phenomenal albums

Thriller & Off The Wall. Let's hope he is remembered for them and not the sad freak show that followed.

A sad day for music, up there with the passing of Elvis & Lennon.

0
GunsOfBrixton | 26 June 2009 - 11:04am

and, for me, John Henry Bonham

He was the only musician whos death touched me at the time.

OK, possibly Jeff Buckley as well but not to the same extent. I was older and more cynical by then.

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 3:27pm

I'm wearing a black armband

It may change colour to a white one later in the day.

0
Vexed | 26 June 2009 - 11:04am

The latex-legged phenomenon

My favourite memories of Jacko as an artist, rather than a freak show, stem from that period when he went Imperial.

One was the legendary rubber-legged Motown Anniversary performance. Alright, he was miming but as soon as he did THAT dance move gobs were well and truly smacked. I remember calling my mum in to watch it. She curtly dismissed it with "Huh, Fred Astaire could do that".

Then there's the media event that was the release of the 'Thriller' video. I recall it being premiered late one Friday night on C4 and the rumours were that it was something special (remember this was in the days when a bit of a slow motion effect in a video was state-of-the-art). And of course, it was - instantly setting the benchmark against which all pop videos must be judged. The fact that they had Big Brother contestants trying to emulate the zombie dance 25 years later shows how much it has entered into folk memory.

That said, musically I don't think he ever topped 'Off The Wall'. Despite my advancing years (and no matter how light on your feet you were, when you get into your 40s you will dance like A Dad), 'Don't Stop' can still drag me onto the floor like I'm in the grip of a tractor beam. The whoop followed by Quincey's ecstatic string run must surely be one of the most perfect moments in pop music.

You could say that the whiter his skin became, the less essential his music was. But that would probably be simplistic.

0
CaptainBlack | 26 June 2009 - 11:10am

Before you comment,

please take my strong advice; remember to always think twice.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 26 June 2009 - 11:07am

Oh dear.

Sad to see him go I suppose. But I'm afraid neither he nor his music meant anything at all to me.

0
eddie g | 26 June 2009 - 11:07am

Did anyone

ever see him in concert? I did back in the 80s at Wembley and it was sublime. It was the first non-rock gig I'd been to and to be part of what was in essence a dance-floor packed with many thousands of people was pretty uplifting. He may have been a bit of a fuck-up but he was a great entertainer and one of the most gifted vocalists around. I also suspect he was one of the most manipulated and abused artists in the history of rock and pop.

0
McLongWhiteCloud | 26 June 2009 - 11:09am

hear hear

what he said

innocent , naive lamb to the slaughter and he and Mr Jones made exceptional music at times and he could dance like few could or will

who cares about the other shit

0
Junior Wells | 26 June 2009 - 11:13am

Is it possible that MJ reached a level of recognition..

..across the world greater than any other musician? I can only think of Bob Marley having a similar level of awareness pretty much wherever you travelled.

0
jimmymack | 26 June 2009 - 11:17am

According to one poster on here

I am 'completely off my tree' because The Beach Boys were more of an influence to me than Jacko was. Are we not allowed our own taste anymore? To set the record straight I have 2 Beach Boys albums and no Jacko albums. Let us be honest here Michael Jackson was as much noted for his entirely weird behaviour as for his music and dance. Witnessed by the fact that I have had 17 Michael Jackson jokes texted to me already this am but not one text mourning the death of this icon. Apparently Amazon top 15 music sales today are all Michael Jackson cd's. Why was this not the case yesterday? The nations fawning over someone who has tragically died prematurely is, to be quite honest,a joke. Someone on BBC today described this as 'The day the music died'. It is of course no such thing. I would also seriously contend that Michael Jackson never was a musician but was a performer. Two very different things. I accept that he was loved by millions but for those that do not count ourselves amongst those millions - are we not allowed a view? Our opinions muzzled for the sake of preserving the legend?

0
Steve Turner | 26 June 2009 - 11:36am

One by one

1. The "influence" was on other artists, including those we have no time for, not on ourselves.

2. If you normally got non-ironic texts from your friends mourning the death of celebs, I'd seriously suggest you replaced your social circle.

3. On Amazon sales. I was working at the HMV Shop when Elvis died. His record sales went overnight from a bagful a day to a truckful. In what way does that diminish his importance?

4. MJ's musicianship and vocal craftsmanship are beyond doubt, but even if they weren't, was Elvis a musician or more a performer, according to your distinction? What about Frank Sinatra? Or even, in the last 20-odd years of his life, Pavarotti? And so what if they were performers? Does that make them less valid as entertainers - or do you see musicians more as creative artists with "something to say" than as entertainers? (If so, it would explain a lot.)

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 11:54am

Off Your Tree

That was me. One of the biggest musical influences on me personally was an obscure Mod band from the mid 80s called The Moment. Moved me more than almost any other band or artist ever.

But Michael Jackson: I was, as Archie says talking about influence on other artists and on the music industry in general.

Before Michael Jackson the way the industry worked was completely different. Nothing had been marketed quite like Thriller was and almost everything was afterwards. He was pretty much the defining artist where the 'new' video culture was concerned, landmark video after landmark video. And before Thriller the album was released, in the States certainly, black artists weren't really allowed to crossover on radio or TV. MTV was mostly white artists, American mainstream radio ditto. It's almost definite that Hip Hop (and many Hip Hop artists/performers/fans agree) that without MJ's success the door would never have been opened to them.

I can name off the top of my head a multitude of performers and bands that are without doubt influenced by MJ. I would struggle to do the same with The Beach Boys, never mind his influence over the industry and his continued place on the world stage. I would stand by my belief that he was probably the most important performer/musician/phenomenon in music over the past 25 years.

The Beatles are always named as probably the best band ever. But a huge part of their continued influence was because of the place they held in the culture around them, the influence they had on the world and the music industry, an influence that continues. MJ was the same, like his music or not.

0
SimonL | 26 June 2009 - 12:20pm

Very well put sir

I concur

0
DougieJ | 26 June 2009 - 2:39pm

Some observations

The influence was not only directly artistic. He was the first black artist who REALLY crossed over into the mainstream proper and was a big influence on the black artists who came after. Others had hovered there, but still mainly appealed to the black audience and outside America.

There are few people I think who understand the level of adulation he received. The Beatles would understand, so would Muhammed Ali, simply becasue of the overwhelming global reach they had. Michael Jackson was the first non-white truly global superstar. for much of the world that was a BIG deal. He also benfitted from not having to endure the fragmentation we see now. for this reason, no other album is ever going to sell as many as Thriller has.

His best work may have been done by 1990. so what? The work was done all the same. It also applies to the Beatles and even the likes of Dylan. And the fact is he was indeed fantastically good at what he did, before the tics overtook the voice, which at its peak was a beautful instrument in itself.

The murkier parts of his life will probably never be fully understood, more about arrested dvelopment rather than malice. This was a man who never really had a proper childhood, performing from 5 and becoming such a huge star that he (or anyone) would struggle to cope with the psychological effects. In the end he couldn't cope and that's sad.

0
illuminatus | 26 June 2009 - 3:23pm

Just let the music speak...


0
Reno Dakota | 26 June 2009 - 11:41am

I Met Him Once

I was editing Smash Hits and he was in town for a dinner thrown by his record company to celebrate his all-round fabness. The Mansion House or somewhere like that, must have been around 87/88. We all had to line up like at a Royal Variety Show and he was then brought along the line and introduced to each and every one of us. He said hello to me in that familiar high-pitched tone and I remember that his handshake was predictably light. Er, that's it.

0
barneytabasco | 26 June 2009 - 11:48am

The life is over

and all the inventions, monstrosities, myths, visions, revisions, metaphors and allegories can all begin.

One thing that that tends to be overlooked is that he actually wrote many of his best and most well known songs.

Billie Jean, Don't Stop, Beat it to name only three. That puts him up there with the greatet writers of pop.

His phrasing, falsetto, vibrato, lightness and strength as required made him as good as a singer as there has ever been in pop.

He could dance with the grace of Fred Astaire and the athleticism of Michael Jordan.

And he commanded the world stage from the age of 8 to his death at 50.

Talented, it's fair to say

Michael - and Farah too, I feel like a part of me has died today

I'm going to have a blackcurrant Spangle and bounce around on my space hopper for a bit

And then wipe away a tear or two

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 12:08pm

Hear ya. Now hear this

This is MJ with his songwriter hat on, at a suitably jaunty angle. The original demo for Billie Jean.


To claim, as some do, that Quincy Jones deserves all the credit for MJ as a solo artist isn't just mean-spirited, it's palpably and provably false.

(A cap-doff to Jude Rogers for the heads-up on this.)

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 12:20pm

Hmmmm

Are you sure that's a demo and not just an early take? It sounds rather too complete to me, guitar lick and all.

0
CaptainBlack | 26 June 2009 - 12:40pm

I assume . . .

that when you're Michael Jackson, you don't have to do demos in your bedroom with your Bix-Bessell acoustic guitar and a Chad Valley cassette recorder.

I don't know, maybe you're right, but at that level, people do call in session musicians even for demos. And Michael Jackson wasn't Prince or Macca, able to program the drums and play all the parts himself. If Elvis used P.J. Proby to lay down his demo vocals during the soundtrack-album years, I see no reason why MJ shouldn't have hired a guitarist for his demos.

The song is, after all, credited to MJ alone, with no co-credit for QJ. He must have nailed it down in some form for QC to arrange before the final recording session, so a simple demo like this would make sense.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 1:30pm

I love the intro to " I want you back"

it's one of the happiest most engaging few bars of music I know. One the best teenage parties I ever went to was soundtracked by the thriller lp being played 2-3 times. including turning all the lights completely off for "thriller" it self and doing stupid scary dances and screaming the lyrics (we were only 12-13) it was truly joyful.
It was strange in the pub last night as someone put the telly on but we couldn't see the screen and I watched as one lass just started crying and the news spread round the room truly an odd moment.

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 12:39pm

Oh for crying out loud. This

Oh for crying out loud. This pathetic outpouring of grief from hysterical sheep. The bigger the name the more the hysteria. Unfortunately it's been like this for decades. Rudolph Valentino's death in 1926 provoked scenes of mass hysteria - I can't wait for the reported suicides of despondent fans - right through to the Royal Whore Diana, where unfortunately there were no reported suicides.
Let's hope there's such an outpouring of joy when Margaret Thatcher dies.

0
biggaboy | 26 June 2009 - 1:28pm

If only Thatcher had died yesterday

it would've been completely overshadowed by Jacko. Sigh.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 26 June 2009 - 1:45pm

Bloody hell

The biggest pop musician in the world dies and you're annoyed that there's a bit of 'hysteria' over it?
I think it's more pathetic to be complaining about it, whilst looking forward to suicides of fans. If you don't like the reaction, switch off for a few days and have some fun elsewhere :)

0
TIAL | 26 June 2009 - 2:04pm

Thanks Tial

I thought Biggaboys response above and below was a little over the top. I was merely reporting what I'd seen, wishing further death into the world is never a good thing to my mind .

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 2:07pm

As my sister said last night,

she was not particularly surprised or shocked to hear that he had died but similarly would not be particularly surprised or shocked to hear tomorrow that he hadn't.

He had become so much a media freak show that it is easy to lose sight of what he used to be, and what he achieved. I immediately think of the various videos from 'Thriller' - he really did open the door for black artists on MTV, and define an entire genre for those who came after.

At the moment an artists peaks he or she is by definition doomed to fail to repeat that success. That said, in the face of the pressure of the O2 gigs and comeback trail generally this starts to look like a tragically perfect end to a career.

0
Steven C | 26 June 2009 - 1:37pm

It certainly takes a "biggaboy"

to use such abroad brush to dismiss others peoples behaviour out of hand.

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 1:37pm

Go and weep into your

Go and weep into your Thriller pillowcase, but do it quietly. Or even better, use the pillowcase in another way...

0
biggaboy | 26 June 2009 - 1:46pm

Can't let this pass...

What other way would you use a pillowcase...? Parachute? Sleeping bag for kittens? Am I missing something?

0
Beany | 26 June 2009 - 3:37pm

We used to use them

For the distribution of Christmas presents. Perhaps that's what he meant. Unless it's a KKK reference.

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 26 June 2009 - 3:56pm

Baby delivery

by storks

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 3:57pm

My guess

is he meant pillow and meant him to smother himself. But I'm cynical like that.

0
Leedsboy | 26 June 2009 - 4:11pm

Let's not get maudlin

I've never been moved to tears by a pop star's death and never will. Closest I ever came was when Kirsty MacColl died. It's not like I knew these people.

Yes, he leave a legacy of some nice disco music, but really, wasn't it just all a bit showy and over-produced?

That said, I love the intros to Got To Be There and I'll Be There.

0
Five-Centres | 26 June 2009 - 1:55pm

"Pop"

n. & adj. (abbrev. "popular").

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 2:00pm

Pop, popular

Yes? What?

0
Five-Centres | 26 June 2009 - 2:09pm

Your second paragraph

It worked for more people all over the world than any other music in history. You may find it showy and over-produced - I do too, a good deal of it, especially the "watch me now" incitement to idolise of the live shows,* which opened the gates for the swarms of miming Madges, etc. - but hundreds of millions would disagree with us.

(*Although many others are also guilty of that - right, Bruce?)

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 3:18pm

Environmental waste hazard

Surely California's health and safety legislation would forbid burying or cremating Jackson's corpse? It would be an environmental disaster! As it can't possibly decompose by natural methods, the party who undertook to indemnify for losses of his O2 stint could exhibit it on stage for the contracted 13 minutes a night and try to recoup some of their losses.

0
titch | 26 June 2009 - 1:57pm

Danny Baker's...

...just started his radio show with Mr. Bojangles.

0
Paolo Meccano | 26 June 2009 - 2:07pm

it's good isn't it

:)

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 2:08pm

Very appropriate, I thought.

0
Paolo Meccano | 26 June 2009 - 2:26pm

To coin a phrase ...

Michael Jackson died when he went into the barmy.

0
Steven C | 26 June 2009 - 2:13pm

Sad to see anyone die at

Sad to see anyone die at aged 50.

Thought I'd tuned into the wrong station when I heard Jacko coming out of the speakers of BBC6 this morning at 7am!!

0
masked tortilla | 26 June 2009 - 2:30pm

Just out of interest..........

Is there any other musical figure still with us, whose passing could cause such a commotion on such a scale? Commanding the front page of every single newspaper from Sitka to Sydney and all points in between.

Macca? Maybe
Dylan? possibly the nearest thing to Jackson in the sense of how he impacted on populist culture...

That's it really isn't it? Wow.......!

0
Six Dog | 26 June 2009 - 2:23pm

McCartney possibly

I don't think anything would be comparable though because of the scale of MJ's fans.

I don't really know anyone in my generation (including myself) who knows much about Dylan, he just doesn't have as big a public profile.

0
TIAL | 26 June 2009 - 2:26pm

For the Baby Boomer generation.....

especially in the States, Dylan has (had) that power.

0
Six Dog | 26 June 2009 - 3:48pm

Hmm

I'm not even sure that's true without adding "college-educated". And that would leave out the many, many millions of Americans who'd be far more affected by the death of Garth Brooks than that of Bob Dylan. They'd probably assume "Bob Dillon" was Matt's dad.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 4:28pm

Bono?

?

0
Retro Man | 26 June 2009 - 3:31pm

Madge

I think her passing would elicit the same kind of kerfuffle, although not in my house.

0
torrential1 | 26 June 2009 - 4:02pm

Miley Cyrus

obviously

0
Black Type | 26 June 2009 - 7:55pm

O2 shows to go ahead

Michael Jackson's shows at London's 02 arena WILL go ahead, say promoters.

'Michael Jackson: Messiah' will celebrate the life of the People's Prince of Pop with MICHAEL's recorded VOICE playing over LIVE-ISH backing tracks while PROFESSIONAL dancer HAND-PICKED by MICHAEL before he was tragically murdered by the CIA will perform three hours of dance routines which the 50-year-old invalid would DEFINITELY have done himself if he hadn't been tragically poisoned by jealous rival promoters.

The show culminates with an exclusive NEW SONG, 'Bless you, My Children' EXCLUSIVELY CHANNELLED from beyond the grave by MICHAEL's 'friend' Uri Gellar.

Existing ticket sales will be honoured. No refunds. Read the small print, suckers. Bring your own glove.

0
Captain Underpants | 26 June 2009 - 2:24pm

That's not TOO far removed from the Elvis Live

spectacular that's touring the world. (Most of) the TCB band and Elvis on a big screen.

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 3:35pm

Get yourself a lawyer...

or copyright that quickly! In this day and age I can actually see some promoter nicking your idea and putting that show on.

Of course before it reaches the stage there would be the inevitable ITV auditions show search for a Jacko where the saddest lookalike fans battle it out over who has spent the most on plastic surgery to look like the victim of bad plastic surgery.

0
Retro Man | 26 June 2009 - 3:39pm

psst

It was the CIA, the FBI and a guy down the chip shop who swear he's Santo Trafficante

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 2:40pm

Interesting reading....

As I earlier said, I am no fan, tho' I have the roster of many of the massive hits between the Jackson 5 and up to mid or late 80s; Thriller, I suppose. Most of what I have read here has stuck in my craw with a bad taste, nasty mealy mouthed comments, by and large. All Archie is saying that to a wide section of a worldwide audience of all ages, Jackson was, OK long long before yesterday, a credible and enjoyable pop singer, giving pleasure. And, yes, he could write a tune, carry a note and dance very well, however irritatingly. And much as our pantheon of western gods is littered with Springsteens and Bowies, in the wider world they probably mean diddlysquat. It will really be Jackson and Madonna. however bitter a pill that may seem to be to swallow.
Now, that's my bit, I'm back to searching out more artists who mean nothing to no-one......

0
Retropath2 | 26 June 2009 - 3:44pm

Recorded legacy? Top ten?

Its worth stepping back and looking at the actual legacy.

The Motown stuff was as good/bad as Motown gets. The good stuff was astonishing but there was a lot of dross. None of it was written by MJ however, no surprise given his age but his contribution was as performer.

He wrote some stuff for the Jacksons including a couple of classics.

Then between 1979 and 2001 he releases 5 albums, roughly one very four years. Of these the first three are the most succesful commercially and the first two critically. His writing contribution to the first two is three tracks on Off The Wall and four on Thriller. When he ups the writing stakes on Bad the qualilty overall suffers. As to the cross fertilisation with rock dont forget the influence of Quincy Jones on all three of these albums.

This is not a terribly exciting contribution. I realise that the youngsters hate it when us old guys do this but compare this record to the Beatles or the Beach Boys in the sixties.

MJ deserves to be remembered as a performer first and foremost but any suggestion that his musical contribution is in the top ten doesnt bear close scrutiny.

0
doctor.nacko | 26 June 2009 - 3:52pm

Oh dear. Suddenly dawned on me....

...a scary face may be slapping on to my matt in about a week and a half. Word will be hard at work selecting one of MJ's faces for the front cover. How can they not ? But which face ? Hopefully from the Off The Wall period, before the madness kicked in. Otherwise it will put the sight of Iggy Pop on the cover before last into perspective.

0
Doods | 26 June 2009 - 3:52pm

Why not

break with the herd and use a 'different' MJ picture for next month's cover - one from the cartoon series, when he was at his best.

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 4:07pm

and Q

will probably have 10 different covers. A tribute you understand. Nothing at all to do with extra sales. No sirree.

0
Beany | 26 June 2009 - 4:09pm

except that

the cover of the August Q already seem to have MJ on the front. A weird piece of synchronicity (Michael Jackson Unmasked: Inside the mad, bad etc. blah). Could go either way for them there I think...

0
illuminatus | 27 June 2009 - 10:42pm

MJ made some of the best pop and disco records...

... of the '70's and '80's.

And he performed them superby whether in concert, in the studio or on television.

Not many people can claim that and it is right that he is celebrated for it.

I now hope to avoid reading and hearing about him over the next week. I'll keep the tv remote handy!

0
Nicodemus | 26 June 2009 - 3:58pm

UNEMPLOYED MAN DIES

Michael Jackson a 50 year old man who has done nothing for 10 years, except sample numerous plastic surgery procedures to maintain his theory of what a human being should look like, sadly passed away in his rented LA domicile last night.
Jackson had previously left a legacy of classic pop tunes with Motown, Epic and Sony Record Companies. It is believed that these will now be re-released to remind unborn children what they have missed in life.
A spokesman at Sony stated today that "Michael had single-handlely kept record pressing plants in worthwhile employment throughout the 80's". He went onto add that thanks to a new innovation of the digital age Sony were planning to extend Michael's work into a new listening format that would be called the 'Sony Thrilla'.
Members of the Jackson Family at this time are uncertain if they will be available for the next edition of 'Celebrity Big Brother'. Family spokesman Jermaine stated exclusively he had no plans to re-release 'Let's Get Serious' as a mark of respect.
Artists such as Bruce Springsteen and Neil Young, who have continued to release product and tour in the 10 years that Jackson has been unemployed,were unavailable for comment as their helicopters circled a field in Somerset that was a quagmire of mud and sewage.

0
CharlieB | 26 June 2009 - 4:06pm

Now, I've no wish to deny anyone their right to an opinion.

But, in all seriousness, I don't think I've ever seen so much wrong-headed, mean-spirited 'that don't impress me much' contrarianism posted anywhere on this board as there has been in this thread. And from people who consider themselves music fans as well. David Hepworth's original post is fairly characteristic of his 'let's not get too carried away, now' approach to topics like this, but I'm frankly staggered by the number of people who appear to be suggesting that Michael Jackson was really never all that much of a singer or a songwriter, whose influence on dance music extended no further than wedding discos, and whose influence on popular music as a whole was considerably less than that of Van bloody Morrison. I mean, I like Van and all, but for crying out loud. This shouldn't even be open for debate, least of all on here.

Fair enough if his music meant little or nothing to you. Personally, I feel much the same way about Kurt Cobain, but I've never felt the need to make a public show of it. To be perfectly honest, there's not an awful lot of Michael Jackson's music I especially care for from 1992 onwards, but before that? Different story. This rush to be the first to declare that you can't understand what all the fuss is about is schoolkid stuff. An American acquaintance of mine who travelled a lot as a kid told me in an email about how he still remembers the way kids in far-flung places who could barely speak English would say to him, "American? American? MICHAEL JACKSON!" In his words, "I never forgot how his music seemed to be the one thing around the world that EVERYONE knew. THE ONE THING."

I know it's the done thing these days to adopt a position whereby anything that is massively successful and enduringly popular is somehow assumed to be suspect. But it's really not that complicated. Sometimes, music becomes popular and successful because it connects with people, inspires them, allows them a brief escape from their troubles, lifts them out of what can sometimes be abject misery, makes them dance, sing, smile, laugh, cry, and generally feel good - all the things that remind us that we're alive. This is what music is really for, and this is what Michael Jackson's music did for people - millions upon millions of them. Fine if you don't happen to be one of them, but don't act as if that marks you out as someone special. It doesn't.

0
Joey Jones | 26 June 2009 - 4:11pm

What he said

sounds sensible to me.

0
Leedsboy | 26 June 2009 - 4:14pm

I agree

And I do think there's a bit of a tendency to imply that he was *only* a pop star - as if the calling followed by, say, Nick Cave was of a significantly higher order. Can I suggest that if were white and British the tone would be a bit different?

0
David Hepworth | 26 June 2009 - 4:21pm

here, here

JJ

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 4:32pm

As opposed to white and American?

But that wouldn't make it right.

If he was John Lee Hooker the tone would be different.

Or Miles Davis.

Or Smokey Robinson.

If he hadn't turned his life, and his appearance, into a bad joke the tone would be different.

And if he hadn't shared his bed with children, the tone would be different.

The reaction of many is nothing to do with his colour.

0
Lando Cakes | 26 June 2009 - 8:42pm

Miles Davis wasn't exactly a saint, either.

Misogynist, woman-beater, drug addict, not a particularly good father, didn't care too much for white people (perhaps understandably) unless they were good musicians. Yet, he changed the face of jazz, rock, funk and r&b, and right up until his death he was trying to expand his artistic range and move music forward.

There comes a point where we should at least try to separate the art from the artist. Here's a list of names; the aformentioned Miles, Alfred Hitchcock, Ike Turner, John Bonham, Marvin Gaye, John Lennon, James Brown, Pablo Picasso. All these people, if we're to believe the stories, behaved fairly reprehensibly in their personal lives, yet they all undeniably made a considerable contribution to the gaiety of nations. If we, the audience, insist on demanding more from artists than just their work, then we should consider the possibility that we may learn certain things about them that we'd perhaps rather not know.

Part of the reason that Michael Jackson was such an extraordinary talent is because he never had an ordinary upbringing. Again, if we're to believe the stories, his childhood (such as it was) mostly consisted of a punishing work schedule and regular beatings and tauntings from his father. There can be little doubt that this had a substantial effect on both the man and the artist. And I don't believe that celebrating the work of Michael Jackson the artist - work which, at its best, is the equal of anything in the realm of modern popular music (yes, I said it) - has to be read as an endorsement of the behaviour of Michael Jackson the man. Your mileage may vary.

0
Joey Jones | 27 June 2009 - 1:41pm

Gary Glitter?

0
ChaosandMorphine | 27 June 2009 - 1:45pm

Well, Gary Glitter's not dead yet.

Otherwise I'd have included both him and Phil Spector in that list. Nevertheless, I have no doubt that, when he does pop off, someone will attempt to make a case for Rock'n'Roll Part 2, I'm The Leader Of The Gang and numerous others being landmark moments of early 70s British pop. And you know what? I'll be right there, nodding in agreement. This doesn't mean that I don't think Gary Glitter, or rather the man behind the mask, as it were, is a loathsome human being. I can completely understand why, for some people, Gary Glitter's music (and that of Michael Jackson) is tainted beyond redemption, but that's a matter for them.

0
Joey Jones | 27 June 2009 - 2:44pm

That's right, he is still 'alive'

Sometimes it's difficult to separate the art from the artist.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 27 June 2009 - 2:57pm

Difficult, yes, but not impossible.

My point was that, in some cases, it's worth making the effort. Perhaps less so in Gary Glitter's case, but certainly all the others I listed.

0
Joey Jones | 27 June 2009 - 3:05pm

My mileage does indeed vary

The people you list did indeed have their unpleasant side. The difference is, I think, that Michael Jackson turned himself into an absurd joke. Can you imagine Miles Davis bleaching his skin to appear more 'white'?

Perhaps the pathetic can taint their art in a way that the merely unpleasant cannot?

Or perhaps my view is formed by the fact that I've never found his music anything other than vaguely irritating and plasticky.

0
Lando Cakes | 27 June 2009 - 3:27pm

(No subject)

0
torrential1 | 28 June 2009 - 2:47am

Thank You

The perfect summary. I encourage you to read it again whilst listening to "I Want You Back"...and smile.

0
ccpsl | 26 June 2009 - 4:28pm

Famous isnt the same as great........

MJ was famous because of Thriller, the all time best selling album which is unlikely to be displaced in the future.

Worth looking at the next few in the sales stakes.

AC/DC - Back in Black
Meatloaf - Bat Out of Hell
Eagles - Greatest Hits
VA - Dirty Dancing Soundtrack
VA - The Bodyguard Soundtrack

Does this mean that Meatloaf's music is more important than the Beatles or Bob Dylan?

0
doctor.nacko | 26 June 2009 - 5:01pm

No, he was famous long before that.

He just became enormously, globally famous after Thriller, the musical, cultural and social impact of which was a lot fucking bigger than that of The Smiths, believe me. I'm serious. Read up on it. But please, spare me the Wikipedia Best Selling Albums of All Time list you appear to be using as a crutch to prop up your strawman argument.

0
Joey Jones | 26 June 2009 - 5:23pm

But that doesn't change the point

that 'famous' doesn't equal 'great'. Neither does commercial success equal 'great'.

MJ was a world famous entertainer who shifted a vast number of units; does that necessarily make him a great singer, a great writer, a great artist? No.

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 5:47pm

No, but...

what's to say he didn't become a world famous entertainer who shifted a vast number of units because he was a great singer, a great writer* and, in his heyday, a great artist?

(* We all have our own opinions, but in a hypothetical worldwide survey, I'm confident that the writer of "Don't Stop Till You Get Enough", "Billie Jean", "Wanna Be Starting Something", "Beat It" and "Bad" would be ranked somewhat above the writer of "This Charming Man", "Heaven Knows I'm Miserable Now" and "Sheila Take A Bow".)

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 6:06pm

Well, that's not the point I'm trying to make

Nor is it one I agree with. And before I grudgingly concede that I'm in a minority here and withdraw accordingly, I'll just point out that you're the one who's blowing off the writer of Billie Jean (an instant classic), one of the most original and recognisable pop vocal stylists of the 20th century (up there with Elvis, Sinatra, Crosby and James Brown), and arguably one of the greatest, if not the greatest, creator of popular art since the Beatles.

0
Joey Jones | 26 June 2009 - 6:10pm

I grudgingly conceded

that I was in a minority first thing this morning, but that hasn't stopped me, nor should it stop you.

(A tip: Diss The Smiths; it keeps things lively.)

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 June 2009 - 6:17pm

I'm ignoring the bait

but Morrissey was a better lyricist than Jacko.

0
Leedsboy | 26 June 2009 - 8:54pm

Ahem

Bono is a better lyricist than Jacko

("over me and over you, held together with God's glue")

mind you, qua "a loo bop a woo bop a bop bam boom" lyrics are not central the the project

0
Glenbervie | 1 July 2009 - 8:46pm

And that's the big question.

Was he 'the greatest creator of popular art since the Beatles' or was he merely a good dancer with a half-way decent voice?

I tend to the latter.

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 7:49pm

hold your hand to your ear

can you hear the roar of the rest of the world changing their minds and agreeing with the nay sayers and grumpy trousers round here with their definitions of dance music and dancing critiques.
I'm not always with the big battalions on many issues, but the word massive i can safe say are the last people to judge anyone else's dancing! I think greatest,best and most popular have coalesced in MJ's case and you can rail against the tide if you like but well you may just be wrong on this occassion it's like trying to argue against man u or microsoft.

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 8:08pm

Man Utd

are just RUBBISH at dancing.

Pretty good at football though.

0
Black Type | 26 June 2009 - 8:24pm

What about

Ji Sung Park? He just cant, he just cant, he just cant control his feet.

0
Molesworth | 26 June 2009 - 8:32pm

Hee - hee

Very good.

Chamone :-)

0
Black Type | 26 June 2009 - 8:59pm

I prefer the original, meself:-

# Don't blame it on Biscan
Don't blame it on Finnan
Don't blame it on Hamann
Blame it on Traore #

0
Paolo Meccano | 27 June 2009 - 9:11am

I successfully manage to avoid using Microsoft products

and I wouldn't recognise Man U if they walked through my front door :-)

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 10:04pm

There'd be

11 of them, dressed in red. Unless it's a Father Christmas tribute band after your vintage synths.

0
Molesworth | 26 June 2009 - 10:08pm

And there would be a cross looking man

with a big red nose, chewing gum and a hairdryer.

0
Leedsboy | 26 June 2009 - 10:28pm

Why would he be

chewing a hairdryer? Tough lads these Glaswegians...

0
Molesworth | 26 June 2009 - 10:31pm

I agree

with you

0
man.of.soup | 26 June 2009 - 10:01pm

Nice one.

Thank you.

0
DanP | 27 June 2009 - 12:43am

Well put

I wanted to say something like that, but couldn't put it eloquently enough.

(that's in reply to Joey Jones' post, BTW. Silly me)

0
TIAL | 26 June 2009 - 4:21pm

LA Times

“As a child star, he was so talented he seemed lit from within; as a middle-aged man, he was viewed as something akin to a visiting alien who, like Tinkerbell, would cease to exist if the applause ever stopped.”

The applause did stop

And like that he was gone

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 4:20pm

Archie you missed the point of my posting

Firstly I didnt compare Michael Jackson with Elvis Presley you did. I have been saddened by the passing of John Martyn,John Lennon, Bob Marley and Johnny Cash. I was not particularly saddened by the deaths of Freddie Mercury, Kurt Cobain, Elvis Presley or Michael Jackson ONLY because they didnt play a big part in my musical upbringing. The point I made about the dramatic increase in sales after an artists Death is relevant. With John Martyn and Johnny Cash I didnt need to go out and buy their cds posthumously as I already owned an extensive wad of their catalogue. If these millions of Michael Jackson obsessives are so into the artist I assume they already have a collection of his cd's especially as the guy wasnt exactly prolific. It doesnt make sense then that real fans are snaffling up his cd's and I rather suspect that the majority are people on the periphery who are buying into the event. This may sound cynical but it is not my cynicism - I wont be buying the cd's. It has also been reported on here that he brought Black music into the mainstream. I am sorry but I have to argue the case that Stevie Wonder and Bob Marley should share as much credit for doing that and both stayed true to their Black roots. I am not even sure that Michaels music was even Black anyway as it was much more rock orientated.The fact is that Michael was an important part of Motowns equivalent of a boy band who went on to have 3 albums of exceptional success.His persona was exploited to create a media freakshow and this as much as any of his musical accomplishments has created the legacy that we will be left with. He is not alone in this. The guy did 3 albums in the last 20 years and nothing in the last 8 - his profile was resurrected by the prospect of 50 sell out shows in London that it is doubtful he would have ever completed. I feel deeply sorry that his recent life was so troubled and accept that millions throughout the world undoubtedly loved him. That is a legacy that his nearest and dearest should be proud of. That doesnt mean however that I should swallow the bullshit hook line and sinker nor does it mean that I have to revise my opinion of his music. Sadly, many have seen the need to do that.

0
Steve Turner | 26 June 2009 - 4:43pm

Why sadly?

Maybe the death of MJ has caused people to revist his music for the first time in some years. That's not a bad thing, surely?

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 4:56pm

"Not sure if his music was black"

Excuse me, but isn't 'rock' derived from black music by definition?
Some people need to get educated...

0
Black Type | 26 June 2009 - 8:05pm

I'm with Steve

very well put.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 27 June 2009 - 5:50am

Buying the event...

... *created* the 1960s ... you could have the mini skirt, the Kinks single and the cinema ticket to see Blow Up (or indeed watch Diana Rigg in rampaging leather on your mum's TV) ... all affordable!

1960s pop culture went hand in hand with a burgeoning consumerism

and on a different, non consumerist point, I don't know how much crossover there is with Word and b3ta, but the Ginger Fuhrer himself (Rob Manuel) accidentally created the Liverpool Street moonwalk

http://www.robmanuel.com/2009/06/27/how-i-started-the-jacko-flashmob-by-...

while here's the moment itself - deliciously pointless and self referential but loads of people did a singalongaBillieJean flashmob ...


Sadly, if Neil Young pegged out tomorrow I doubt that thousands of people would turn up in central London miming the solo on Cowgirl in the Sand...

0
Glenbervie | 1 July 2009 - 9:02pm

I hear

that as a tribute, Rolf Harris will be doing Two Little Boys during his Glasto appearance.

There has also been some dispute as to the cause of death, as, apparently, Jacko was seen having a stroke in the children's ward.

0
Futurenoir | 26 June 2009 - 4:56pm

ahh good old Paedophile jokes

crushing the life out of comedy since 2002.

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 5:01pm

There's plenty more

where those came from

0
Futurenoir | 26 June 2009 - 5:41pm

? Steve Turner's post

To quote your post

"I am sorry but I have to argue the case that Stevie Wonder and Bob Marley should share as much credit for doing that and both stayed true to their Black roots."

Do we talk in terms of artists staying true to their white roots?

Other than Oi bands where that sort of thing might be important

The implication that the artists you name have more "credibility" with non-Caucasian communities globally is questionable as some of the most "street" of hip-hop and rap stars' comments on his death have shown

The picture that tops the article attached demonstrates that for African-Americans the respect and love for him was huge

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/27/us/27Jackson.html?_r=1&src=twt&twt=nyt...

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 5:31pm

It didn't take long

Email received at 5:30 today - a taste of things to come?
Dear Alan,

the world of pop has lost one of its most striking and controversial personalities. The King of Pop is dead. This "t-shirt of the week" reminds us of all the great music he's created and of his grand early days with Motown.
We are still hopeful that he´s just mocking us and that he´s sitting on a tropical island with Jimi, Janis, Elvis, 2 Pac, Kurt this very moment.

I expect the top 40 this week will have a lot of new entries.

0
alankngal | 26 June 2009 - 5:08pm

Sunshine, Moonlight, Good Times

Boogie!

0
tkdmart | 26 June 2009 - 5:28pm

Quite...

so.

0
Patrick Crowther | 26 June 2009 - 5:30pm

let's not forget the moonwalk

Even if you couldn't understand a word he said - people all over the world were staring at it and saying what the ...?

Perhaps that is his defining characteristic. I lived in Africa in the 80s and there were 2 icons ,if I can use that term, Marley and Jackson.

The Elvis comparison is a strong one.

The devotion, the grief ,the victim of celebrity - the waste of talent the debate on artist v puppet as respective careers careered.

Another thing to consider s that Jackson died at 50 so that makes the bulk of his fans early early 30's - vocal , influential now .

0
Junior Wells | 26 June 2009 - 5:32pm

He wrote the songs

What always impressed me about Michael Jackson (and Madonna for that matter) is he wrote so many fantastic songs. I know he had talented writing partners but they all credit MJ with the ideas and inspiration. All the bullshit submerges this point.

And then he could perform like not many others too.

That's the legacy for me: yes he was a fuckin' weirdo but he was a top drawer songwriter.

0
kb | 26 June 2009 - 5:50pm

Reply to Sheevmaster

I didnt bring up the black argument - I responded to comments on this site. Makes no difference to me. I just hope the insinuation wasn't being made that I was being racist. Nothing could be further from my mind.

0
Steve Turner | 26 June 2009 - 5:51pm

No I wasn't implying racism on at all

just responding to your notion that somehow Wonder and Marley more "true to their black roots".

I'm not sure I know what being true to one's roots actually means - or what it has to do with implying greater worth.

And even if it did - Jackson was hugely admired by fellow black artists and fans alike as the reaction to his death shows

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 6:02pm

AGAIN

Elvis was broke when he died, but look at his estate now. There is even a link here with Lisa Marie.He was never a bona fide songwriter - just like Elvis!
Although Michael's 'Hits' became classic once Quincy Jones and Rod Templeman appeared on the scene.
The industry around Michael will never be the same primarily because he was black - just like Otis & Marvin.

0
CharlieB | 26 June 2009 - 5:52pm

huh?

"The industry around Michael will never be the same primarily because he was black - just like Otis & Marvin"

Not sure if you've noticed but things have moved on a tad since then. Many, if not most, of the biggest selling acts in the world are black. Many of the corporations behind these artists are run black entrepreneurs and executives.

But more to the point - Michael Jackson transcended race and national barriers unlike any other artist. From Beijing to Benares to Buenos Aires to Beyond and Back Again.

Everywhere. Everybody. That's his audience

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 8:44pm

Tupac

would have probably fared worse if he was white!

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 8:57pm

the brian wilson thing is interesting too

-family band
-over bearing abusive parental so many peers and management
-dramatic influence on so many artists and audience for whom the music was the soundtrack to a formative part of their lives
- goes completely off the rails
- little productive output for years
- and had the O2 shows gone ahead a resurrection, supported by a crack band where no doubt most of the work will be done by sidekicks with sheltered cameo appearances from the man in question

0
Junior Wells | 26 June 2009 - 6:17pm

The most famous person in the world?

Given Mr Hepworth's comment about the Ethiopian who hadn't heard of Springsteen but knew who MJ was, Joey's "American? American? MICHAEL JACKSON!" anecdote and James's colleagues' reactions in Beijing, I'd like to suggest that Michael Jackson was the most famous person in the world. (US presidents only last eight years, tops.)

Say what you like about his later career and his personal life, that's some achievement.

0
PaddyB | 26 June 2009 - 6:40pm

I was having exactly that conversation over dinner

we spanned 3 generations. The question was "Was Michael Jackson the most famous person in the world?"

I thought he was, but some people threw up suggestions such as Madonna, The Pope, David Beckham and The Queen.

0
TIAL | 26 June 2009 - 8:59pm

One of the tragic consequences

of this is that, despite nearly reaching double-ton status, my 'Least 'Rock' bloke's name' blog has been kept off the number one spot in the 'Hot Topics - Last 7 Days' chart.

Now there's some perspective for you.

0
Captain Underpants | 26 June 2009 - 6:41pm

I was thinking exactly the same thing, Captain...

my commiserations.

0
Patrick Crowther | 26 June 2009 - 7:53pm

And, ironically,

how more "least rock" can you get as a name than Michael Jackson?

I had no idea what tmz.com was until today. I just popped over to look. God it's abysmal. I won't be back. But viewers, look at what's coming:

"We're live at the press conference being held by the Los Angeles County Coroner, regarding Michael Jackson's autopsy. It starts at 1:30 PT -- stay tuned"

0
Molesworth | 26 June 2009 - 8:21pm

And now they've got Paul Morley on Newsnight

talking about him. What next, Ian Penman comparing MJ to Derrida and Roland Barthes?

0
stimpy | 26 June 2009 - 10:21pm

yeah and did you notice both he

and kwame had strange jumpers with epaulettes on them , it must have been a strange tribute to MJ or summat.

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 10:25pm

the vertigo

of undfifferentiated un-diference where difference is both itself and its not self as erased self in act or non-action of being its subversion and so finds resolution that is "resolution" in paradox or self unknown to self yet - paradoxically - does not cannot and

Sheev Penman: Perspective and Being in Michael Jackson's "Ben"

0
Sheev | 26 June 2009 - 10:38pm

how does this relate to the

dialectic meta-Jackson paradigm which to the end had been a will-o-wisp of a simulacrum haunting the edges of the zeitgeist......

0
Chris G | 26 June 2009 - 11:22pm

Shouldn't that be

Shitegeist ! ?

0
Badlands | 27 June 2009 - 5:52am

Paul Morley, the man who...

elevated talking out of one's arse to an art form.

0
Patrick Crowther | 27 June 2009 - 8:51am

The Presley Comparison

has been made a lot, but I also think there is a strong parallel with Judy Garland :-

Manipulated from a young age
Over-worked
Dependent on prescription pills - body constantly cycling (to paraphrase the Kursaals- 'Uppers to counteract the downers, and downers to counteract the uppers')

The pattern keeps repeating itself, as long as there is a buck to be made.

0