Intelligent Life On Planet Rock
Let sleeping gods lie
The increasing number of music legends who have had a visit from G. Reaper Esq. has got me thinking about the unchallenged orthodoxy surrounding the so-called 'rock gods' and the way death seems to enshrine their reputations to the extent that any meaningful critical reappraisal is nigh on impossible.
When McCartney, Dylan, Jagger and the remaining deities have passed away, their critical and commercial stock will be higher than ever. Nothing sets the cash registers ringing like a dead rock star. But I am increasingly coming to the conclusion that the artists that came to prominence in the 1960s and 1970s are a cultural millstone around the neck of every musician that has followed them.
Occasionally we are able to rid ourselves of this cumbersome, dewy-eyed reverence and look back and reevaluate a singer or musician's cultural stock with clarity. I would suggest that Janis Joplin is nowhere near as highly regarded nowadays as she was 30 or 40 years ago. Many people appreciate that her frenzied squawk was not particularly pleasant to listen to. But these examples are rare; most of our gods peer down at us from rock valhalla untroubled by the thought that someone might suggest they were a bit crap.
However we are aware that the list of legends needs some fresh blood, so there is a worrying trend that elevates dead young rock stars to 'greatness' without their really meriting it. Kurt Cobain, a man who made a couple of good records with a rock group called Nirvana, is now worshiped the world over as some kind of spokesperson for doomed youth. It's ludicrous.
So where are we heading? Will the next generation be as in thrall to these heroic figures as we have been over the past decades? Or will they finally let sleeping gods lie and move on?
- More from Patrick Crowther.
- Login or register to post comments







The advert
for Jeff Buckley's X-factor assisted Best Of is pretty awful. The record company pushing him as a messiah that ain't coming back.
Nirvana
Whether you like Kurt Cobain's music or not (I do as it happens), it is undeniable that Nirvana inspired a sea change in the music industry, opening the floodgates for 'alternative' bands to achieve mainstream popularity, marked by the moment that Nevermind took Michael Jackson's 'Dangerous' album off the top of the Billboard Chart.
Their anti-star attitude (while a rather whining, petulant and false act in itself) and way of presenting themselves was also revolutionary and Kurt Cobain was the figurehead of that.
They revitalised a stagnant rock scene (anyone remember Extreme, Mr Big?), but the undertow they brought with them were probably as bad as what went before.
They were a great, unpredictable, impulsive live band and brought danger and excitement back to rock music. I will always remember the first time I heard Smells Like Teen Spirit in the back of my Dad's car aged 13 and thinking 'what the FUCK was that?' and feeling rebellious and excited.
They arguably created the last great musical sea change, and that, coupled with the manner of Cobain's demise, will always make him an iconic figure.
From a personal point of view, they produced three great albums which have stood the test of time. Maybe their impact was disproportionate to the quality of their music - that's a matter of taste. But there's no denying that Cobain is an 'important' figure
I liked Nirvana's music back in the day...
but Cobain's status as deity is, in my opinion, based more upon his life story and suicide than on what is actually important, namely the music.
And I have to say I don't think Nirvana's music has stood the test of time particularly well. It's rather one-dimensional.
The music
Of course it's the most important thing. I was listening to the live album 'From the Muddy Banks of the River Wishkah' and the sheer raggedness of it made it sound fresh and exciting in an age where everything is pro-tooled to death.
In Utero remains their best album and I can't think of anything released since that rivals is for visceral power. I agree that Nevermind can sound a bit 2-D though
In Utero
I tend to agree. It's completely unlike any other rock record ever made.
Like a virgin
As is now notorious around these parts, I knowingly heard Nirvana for the first time only a few months ago. It sounded like bog-standard - if nice 'n' punchily produced - derivative rock to me.
I don't want to derail
....an very interesting thread topic by banging on about Nirvana, but I wouldn't call this bog standard, nicely produced or derivative.
Why. . .
are they miming to a 1978 Siouxsie and the Banshees rehearsal tape?
Each to his own and all that but. . . .
Ha ha ha ha ha
I like that
He
does look better than Thurston or Black, I'll give him that.
I've never
really understood the appeal of the Pixies or Sonic Youth.
I bought Doolittle but it left me cold really, apart from Here Comes Your Man.
Any tips on either band?
I was listening to Trompe Le Monde
last night but Doolittle is a good starting point. Doolittle works really well in terms of light & shade even with the Ringo number thrown in. They're a band that suffer from Best Ofs, try a whole album.
http://www.7digital.com/stores/7_1/artists/pixies/trompe-le-monde/
http://www.7digital.com/stores/7_1/artists/pixies/doolittle/
"Surfer Rosa" by Pixies
is my tip - it's a lot rawer than Doolittle, which I think suffers from a bit of a tinny production in places.
The Surfer Rosa CD had the first mini album "Come On Pilgrim" included too which is a cracker, some truly great songs.
Seconded.
Which is why I was chuffed to have the honour of adding it to the Atlas.
Maybe I'm just a boring old git...
but I lasted about 20 seconds into that clip. I feel like saying "There's a good chap... have a cup of tea and a biscuit. Life is difficult sometimes, but there's no need to make that godawful din."
No... I'm joking. They were good alright, but I just don't listen to much loud rock music anymore. Now where's my Steely Dan cd?
if you've got 'em in alphabetical order
it should be close enough to the Supertramp ones...
Normally they would be...
but I'm in Italy with only one CD at my disposal. The Dan's 'The Royal Scam'... "Turn up The Eagles, the neighbours are listening..."
Haven't they record shops out there, PC?
You've been listening to that one for weeks now.
Or is it like the UK?
I can't imagine the horror of being stuck without access to new music and old music being tantalisingly out of reach.
Yes they have (!)...
but I don't really have the money to go splashing out on CDs while I'm here. So 'The Royal Scam' will have to do. Although if I see a Dan best of cheap, I might stretch to that...
(I have decided that Steely Dan are, and probably always were, my favourite 'group'... so expect endless repetitive posts about them from now on...)
G'wan, skip a meal or 2
If the italian hypermarkets are anything like the french or spanish, you can unearth some really esoteric stuff in their bargain bins. And given the continent is at least a time warp away, it's still 1978 in much of mainland Europe, musically speaking.
Damn...
if it was 1976 I might have been interested...!
I did see a discounted 4 CD box set by the indescribably awful Pooh, legends in Italia. They've been going for 40 years and it bloody sounds like it...
Isn't that the nature of the beast?
You die young, and no-one will ever judge you purely on your music. See Nick Drake, Jeff Buckley, Jim Morrison, Elliott Smith...
And yet...
The first time I heard Nirvana I barely noticed it as it sounded like so much polished American 'pseudo punk'.
Maybe the fact you first heard it at age 13 was the key. That's the right age to be easily influenced. Hendrix and Clapton had the same effect on me at the same age but, of course, I'd argue they were doing something genuinely new and different.
I did, however, have a big "what the FUCK was that" moment at age 28 (-ish) the first time I heard Peel play 'The Adventures Of Grandmaster Flash On The Wheels Of Steel'. For the first time in years, someone was doing something other than mucking around with guitars/synths.
I was listening to 'Adventures' this morning...
and was alerted to the fact that a collegue had no idea who Flash and the Five where. Consider them now educated!
No offence Stimpy
but I think 'maybe the fact you first heard it at age 13 was the key' is a tiny bit patronising...!
I was into quite a lot of punk, hip hop and indie by then and they still made an impression. And not just on 13 year olds...
old person alert
I was 30 or so when Nirvana came along, and I loved them with a passion. Mind you I was already a Pixies fan. But whatever you loved when you were 13 to 19 does stick with you (in my case the Buzzcocks, Pistols and Joy Division).
Not at all patronising...
...but 13 is the exact age at which music tends to really hit home. It's all new and exciting and you're looking for something that's 'yours' rather than the older generations.
I was the same with Hendrix and Free when I was 13-ish
I'd forgotten about Extreme!
Saw them at Wembley Arena back when I had something of a money:sense imbalance. I recall my brother and I getting very giggly at the po-faced Tufnellesque guitar solo.
Turning the page: a 30-year rule?
I agree with Patrick about the decline in Janis Joplin's stock, but would add that Jim Morrison's, Jimi Hendrix's, Mama Cass's and even Otis Redding's has also slowly but steadily slid down over the years since their deaths.
However, John Lennon, John Bonham, Phil Lynott and Rory Gallagher still recline in splendour alongside Cobain on the summit of rock's Mount Olympus. But it's striking that they died in the Eighties or Nineties. This suggests that there may be some kind of 30-year moratorium (see what I did there?) after the death of rock gods, during which time they are immune from any objective reappraisal and page-turning.
If this hypothesis is sound, right now we should be seeing the until-now-minority view that Sid Vicious was no icon but just a talentless prannock who happened to be in the right place at the right time become the generally received opinion, since he's now stranded on the other side of the 30-year threshold.
Maybe you're right
Archie. It might be something to be with not being there at the time, but Hendrix and Redding? Maybe their albums don't come so high in all-time polls, but I think their reputations are still up there.
Nail/head, Simon
I suspect their albums no longer come as high on those lists because hardly anybody listens to their music any more. Even I, a devoted Staxster, listen far more often to, say, Arthur Conley than I do to Otis - he's slowly lost his sheen over the years. Ditto Hendrix - in theory, fantastic, but when you go back and listen to the records, they all sound so.... messy and cymbally.*
[*Sorry Mitch, RIP.]
But the thing with both of them
and particularly Hendrix was that it wasn't just about the records. It was about the live performances, the image, their influence on others. I think Hendrix will still be on the front cover of Mojo in 2072.
Yes, the Che Effect
His reputation has largely been reduced to that unfortunate episode with a can of Ronsonol.
Arthur Conley
Isn't this one of the greatest things that you've ever heard?
http://redkelly2.blogspot.com/2006/09/arthur-conley-i-cant-stop-no-no-no...
One of my favourite blogs
along with his other one, The B Side http://redkelly.blogspot.com/
and Funky16corners http://funky16corners.wordpress.com/
Mine
too.
Spot on
about Sid Vicious - I never could understand why anyone would revre him at all. Genuinely perplexes me.
Interesting to think about contemporary comparisons... What about 2Pac and Biggie. For me, Biggie produced by far the better music (particularly on his first album) but doesn't get nearly the reverence (or t-shirt space) that 2Pac does, as the latter was good looking and iconic.
Sid Vicious was a nasty little man...
who had precisely zero talent. He once tried to slash Bob Harris with a broken bottle in a London club, but members of Procul Harum's road crew came to his rescue. One of them had to have several stitches in a wound inflicted by that moron.
That story is of particular resonance to me as I used to work for Bob, but the point I'm making is just what a pathetic little arsewipe this 'punk legend' actually was.
I love the story, possibly apocryphal,
that Freddie Mercury addressed him, at some random backstage meeting, as "Mister Ferocious".
Now there...
was a proper bloody rock star. God bless ya, Fred, wherever you are...
naw - a quick google
shows that it seems to be true. Vicious said something along the lines of 'ullo Fred, you bringing ballet to the masses' to which Fred responded 'Ah Mr Ferocious - well we're just doing our best, dear!'
I'd have given good money to have been a witness to that exchange, actually...
To be fair...
if Vicious did say that, then he was capable of being rather amusing.
Will Jagger, Dylan, etc.
sell a huge load of records when they die? I guess it depends when they die. There are difference with them and people like Buckley, Elliott Smith, Cobain, etc. Firstly, pretty much everyone has heard the Beatles and The Stones, yet the publicity around the deaths of the others led people to hear their music for the first time.
Secondly, if you are going to sell loads of records from being a dead rock star, I think it is much better to die young and leave a beautiful corpse than a gnarled 80 year-old one.
But the old gods
Are generally the pioneers and that's why we still respect or remember them. Nobody had done what the Beatles, Dylan, Led Zep and, to some extent, the Stones did before or, at least, on nothing like the same scale with the same impact on popular culture. Since then, give or take the odd Cobain or Lydon, we've pretty much been going round the same loop. The other factor is scarcity. There are now so many artists and, in general, their moment in the spotlight is much shorter before The Next Big Thing comes around.
There is an added interest when people die prematurely but as the members of less popular sixties and seventies bands die in their sixties, seventies and eighties I doubt if we'll see a sudden rise in the sales of Marmalade, Chicory Tip, Boney M or, Clapton excepted, the Yardbirds.
For 'Clapton excepted'...
...say "Clapton/Beck/Page" excepted and I'd agree with you
Blushes
Oops, I forgot about Page. Not sure that even Jeff Beck is famous enough to have huge posthumous sales - Hi Ho Silver Lining excepted of course.
I reckon that when Jeff hangs up his Strat
there'll be a huge number of people investigating 'Blow By Blow' and 'Wired' and realising, belatedly, what they've been missing out on all these years.
Eh?
Disregarding the media led herding of nostalgia, surely the longevity of an artist is part controlled by whether you (or I) liked 'em much in the first place. I would take issue with the idea of Phil Lynott or Rory Gallagher somehow being in an ascendancy whilst others, Jim Morrison and Jimi Hendrix, are sliding. Sure, re-appraisal is allowed, which may be a late realisation that someone previously noted but not necessarily enjoyed (Gallagher, Hendrix) is better than one allowed for at the time, but also that the hyperbole about others (Janis Joplin and Nick Drake, say) was indeed over-egged by bandwagoneers. Death is definitely good for sales, but some deaths are bigger cash cows than others.
Ascendancy no, but a plateau, yes
I agree with you about Rory Gallagher. I remember that not long before he died Q ran a far-from-complimentary piece about him which pretty well summed up his image over the 20-year period between his heyday and his death - we could sum it up "heads-down, no-nonsense, mindless blues", "the same-old in a checked shirt" or perhaps "Status Quo but with interminable guitar solos". His death definitely made people realise that there was a lot more to him than that, and that he had been one of the finest instrumentalists the British Isles had ever produced.
Expect him to be forgotten again by 2025, when the tribute "relicked" Strat is no longer fashionable and the 30-years-dead deadline has been reached.
Rory Gallagher
Was always rumoured to be playing at some festival or other according to a video I have of OGWT. The presenters in question may have some connection with this site but I can't be sure.
Many new bands
are unhealthily in thrall to all past pop/rock to point where they are hampered by being too much aware of it surely, not just deified dead old rock gods. Hard to avoid this effect though.
At impressionable age one can be spellbound by stars, whether working in your own time or earlier. I know I was - it was Beatles, Stones, Hendrix, Morrison from earlier times and Bowie, Smiths from my own times, among others. So I guess youngsters can still fall for these people even now, especially when an early death adds to the allure - the magic spell not broken by ageing. When that infatuation diminishes in later years, maybe you can listen more clearly without distraction of mythology - hence we oldies wonder what the fuss is all about in some cases, but haven't you then lost something of the pleasure?
Burn out or fade away ...
Critical appraisal simply ebbs and flows. Death is largely irrelevant in this context other than providing a convenient point for the critic to re-assess. Wider, lasting public acclaim is a different thing entirely.
Die young and be forever cast as a tragic, glamorous figure. And by definition there will be a tragic aspect to the early demise – car accident, overdose, shooting. Some commercial success is required here - although even minimal chart action will be sufficient if death follows swiftly. It may help to have displayed some actual talent but again it’s not always necessary. Sid Vicious is a good example – no talent for anything other than outrage, dies, becomes enduring symbol of disaffected youth. John Lydon, survives, becomes middle-aged spokesperson for creamy dairy products.
It’s certainly not enough just to have invented rock’n’roll – Ike Turner, Bo Diddley, John Lee Hooker probably don’t mean anything to the general public, and I’m guessing that their commercial stock did not rise significantly on death. Eddie Cochrane and Buddy Holly on the other hand are probably pretty well known – in at the beginning, commercial success, and died young. Frankly, they’ve got it all.
But then again, survive, RE-INVENT, die old and you may be embraced as a bona fide media legend. Johnny Cash is an example of a stunning later life re-invention. If he had died before meeting Rick Rubin … well, maybe he would have been remembered only as one of the ‘also rans’, set against the commercial behemoth that is the Presley Estate.
Best of all, have a sufficient degree of initial commercial success however and you can transcend almost anything - middle age, dodgy hairstyles, artistic decline, and death - secure in the knowledge that your kids will reap the financial reward and you will ascend to the pantheon. And, joy of joys, it won’t be your old, embarrassing, broken voiced final incarnation that is remembered but your younger, creative former self. When the time comes you can be sure that no-one will be playing selections from ‘A Bigger Bang’.
The Behemoth
I seriously (well, not entirely, but I want people to read on) suspect that if Elvis had died immediately after the '68 comeback special, instead of in his pudgy rhinestoned-out-of-his-brain incarnartion ten years later, the entire history of popular music over the last 40 years may have been very different.
I was working at the HMV Shop when he died. Every other day for months a truckload of Elvis albums would be shipped in to feed the lip-curling (and all too often toe-curling) cravings of the masses for Official Commemorative Product. Although sales dwindled gradually as time went on, the dwindling was only relative - by the time I left 18 months later it was a still a vanload being delivered by RCA every couple of days, with Elvis shifting three or four times more records than even the Fabs. And that was smack-bang in the middle of The Whole Punk Thing - the time couldn't have been less propitious.
Now just imagine the broohah if he'd died before rock in its still-current post-Brian Jones Stones/Led Zep/Bowie sense had ever got off the ground. Would it have even got off the ground at all?
We might have had
the full-blown X Factor by 1976 - featuring Robert Plant singing Peter Sarstedt covers. Bowie stuck doing mime outside Hammersmith Tube Station. And John Lydon on TV advertising butter?
It's never occurred to me before but I guess that the whole late 60's, early 70's 'rock'n'roll revival' - Sha Na Na at Woodstock, Bill Hailey and Chuck Berry back in the charts etc - must have come off the back of the '68 Comeback Special.
Fonztastic!
According to an old cyberchum of mine, a mad professor from Brooklyn, the year 1968 - or more specifically the Tet Offensive - was a watershed in American popular culture in lots of other ways too. For instance, it marks when the pre-Tet word "cool" fell into full disfavour as soon as the Fonz started using it dozens of times a week, and it would take a full generation for it to recover its status as a cool - or, if you prefer, kewl - word.
I like that idea
of dividing the history of Western culture into pre-Tet and post-Tet, particularly as no-one under 30 would have any idea what you were talking about. It's very much a reference for the'Word Generation'.
(Note: This year Matthew I'll mostly be using 'Word Generation' as a more dignified alternative to the 'Massive')
I'm not sure about that...
The Beatles' Fats Domino-tribute Lady Madonna pre-dates Elvis' 'comeback', surely?
So what is that 4 Tet then?
Recommended to me in the electronica strand last week.
Well, you did ask
Under the professor's system, electronica would be a clear post-Tet phenomenon, and more specifically a post-Bicentennial one (July 4th, 1976, being a key sub-watershed within the post-Tet era). And he'd appear to be absolutely right, if we accept the birth of electronica to have been marked by Jean Michel Jarre's Oxygène, because it was indeed released in 1976.
Good grief
Was it that long ago? But surely "Son of My Father" by Chicory Tip predates it in the electronic stakes? Not to mention that ELP and others were doing sets based almost entirely on synths (even the drums) in 1974. And what about the "Switched on Bach", Wakeman's "Six Wives" and the soundtrack of "Clockwork Orange"? You're going to have to argue a bit more for JMJ, Archie.
Drum machines are required for electronica, I think
The Moog was demonstrated at Monterey Pop Festival in 1967 (i.e. the cusp of Tet), so synths predate electronica proper by a good 20 years or so. But Wakeman's very large array was backed up by the very human Bill Bruford, rather than sequencers and drum machines, so I'd hesitate to call synthy prog "electronica" proper.
Kraftwerk's Trans-Europe Express was released in 1976 too, by the way.
Tangerine Dream
Use of sequencers on hit album Phaedra in 1974 to make rhythm. Now that's what I call electronica. Kraftwerk Autobahn 1974 too, using electronic percussion, they started with home made dum pads in 1973. Pink Floyd On The Run 1973 experimented with sequencer too. There's this website I've found called Wiki something. All sorts of useful information there you know. I got the Tangerine Dream bit off top of my head though, no cheating.
Hey
All theories have unexplainable bits.
If there is a prog revival in 2009
I would put money on there actually being a band called 'The Cusp of Tet' ... and their album covers will be terrible. I can hardly wait!
Does this mean Anne-Margaret won't be visiting after all, sir ?
Interesting thing about Switched-on Bach is quite how early it was, 1968 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switched-On_Bach). The Bach-loving audience found the chance to hear clearly bits of counterpoint that are often v difficult to hear v appealing - and enough to offset the sheer meepiness of the tone ...
Tet is of course the cusp on which Kubrick's Full Metal jacket hangs (or should that be a peg ...). Before tet we have the Trashmen and surfin bird, after we have the Stones and paint it black ... a cusp well delineated imo (though with a lot of help from his daughter Vivian who was in charge of music iirc).
And the connection of the two is of course via a Clockwork Orange, in which Carlos' synth played an unforgettable role.
Sonic Youth
Recall someone wanting recommendation's for Sonic Youth. May i suggest 'daydream nation' and 'bad moon rising'. The former being their recognised classic, the latter an earlier offering, which captures a band at their most ferocious yet melodic.
For one reason or another, cannot imagine another Kurt Cobain occuring.In these days of games, mobile phones and file sharing, I dont believe that young people are as engaged with bands now, as they were in my day, or indeed at the time Cobain died.
Cannot imagine, if say Chris Martin or Alex Turner died, that there would be the same reaction as when Cobain died. There doesn't seem to be the same relationship between fan and artist as there was.
I can only really think of one artist who, if to die prematurely, would cause an outpouring of grief, and that would be Morrissey
Don't agree
If Alex Turner or Chris Martin died soonish, they would be heralded, especially Alex Turner as his music legacy is very strong and 'culty'.
On a general note, look how Edwyn Collins's stock has risen since his terrible illness. A reunited Orange Juice would practically headline Glastonbury now whereas prior to 2002 they'd have been 5pm on the Peel stage.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY ELVIS
Today is the 74th, or would have been, Birthday of the man who created the dead pop star eulogy thing. Strange to think he was about to go on his proverbial way to bankruptcy in 1977.
Then 'Hey Presto' he is today the richest dead pop star to ever have existed on this planet.
In fact he is a one man industry providing for his family and the city of Memphis.
No one will ever eclipse him in our lifetimes.......just a pity it wasn't Duster Bennett!