Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Kasabian - the Zoolander of Rock

tim tunes's picture

Sorry but surely they are a joke - their performance on The Brits last night being a case in point.

1)The stage prop for 'Fire'? Some Fire
2)The song - its a joke pastiche 'classic rock' soul-rocker. Its just cringe-making if those horns and backing vocals are meant for real
3)The rawk posturing
4)But best of all...Serge's '..move on you gotta move on rap..' at 3:20 on the clip below

I rest my case

3

Last night confirmed

what an absolute shower they are. I'll probably sound like a horrible snob, but to my mind, Kasabian fans are the kind of people who think the wittiest man in the world is Tim Lovejoy

1
Joe R | 17 February 2010 - 9:11am

Hmm

Is it not enough to simply dislike the artist? I think it's unfair to brand those who like Kasabian in this way. I like their latest album, but dislike Tim Lovejoy.

0
Spartacus Mills | 17 February 2010 - 10:21am

I did warn you!

Yes, it's a crass generalisation and yes, I know it's not true in 100% of cases. It's just that's what their music and image symbolises to me.

No offence intended, Mr. Bounce, though I think a lot of the time, we make similar judgments about artists we strongly dislike (who are massively popular)

0
Joe R | 17 February 2010 - 10:30am

Fair point

Well made

0
Spartacus Mills | 17 February 2010 - 10:42am

Funniest thing

Ive read in ages

"Kasabian fans are the kind of people who think the wittiest man in the world is Tim Lovejoy"

and totally spot on

0
garspaceman | 18 February 2010 - 4:07pm

That was the point

where I switched over to the football. I can forgive all the little girls in their dressing-up-box finery, but this was thoroughly depressing.

That's possibly the limpest rock song ever. I'm on Fiiiiiahhh! And I've got some flames to prove it!

Kids are predisposed towards assuming that latest means best when it comes to music, but you have to feel sorry for the generation growing up with this as their yardstick. What a shit time to be young.

0
Captain Underpants | 17 February 2010 - 9:14am

Didn't see them on the Brits

last night, and am at work so cannot see clip you've posted, but I reckon Kasabian are developing quite nicely thank you, and their latest 'West Ryder...', is their best yet, a pleasing mixture of rock and psychedelia. They are apparently a cracking live act as well.

0
Mint | 17 February 2010 - 9:18am

I remember Steve Mason from The Beta Band

once saying in an interview that one of the reasons they were breaking up was that their albums were dying a death while the likes of Kasabian were doing really well.

The Brits this year have proved that I am now officially middle aged. I have only one song by anyone who actually won anything (Bonkers by Dizzee Rascal if you're interested). I have nothing by Kasabian, Lady Gaga, Lilly Allen, Robbie Williams, Florence and the Machine, JLS or any of the others. I've heard tunes by all of them, just never actual bought one.

I do think I care about music and am open to new things. But the evidence really is against me. And I'm only 35!

0
ganglesprocket | 17 February 2010 - 9:31am

I try to catch the Brits every year,

this year was the first time I didn't watch it for some time. I kind of enjoy watching it in a kind of 'State of the Nation' kind of way. This is, after all, the kind of music that many people are consuming now. And I do tend to forget, in my little music bubble, that many folk have never heard of and have no desire to listen to the likes of Fever Ray, Field Music, and heck even someone like Nick Cave. There is a reason why the likes of Kasabian or Snow Patrol or Kaiser Chiefs sell shed loads more than The Beta Band?

0
Mint | 17 February 2010 - 10:27am

I'm older than you and

I'm older than you and appreciate songs by most of the artists you mention. These are all great:

Dizzee Rascal - Holiday
Lady Gaga - Bad Romance
JLS - Beat Again
Lily Allen - plenty of songs
Robbie - plenty of songs

Kasabian... well they have a few good tunes. Florence don't appeal to me a great deal...

0
georgethe23rd | 18 February 2010 - 11:00pm

Point of order

Kids are predisposed towards assuming that latest means best when it comes to music.

I'm not sure that they are any more. The ones I come across like all sorts of things but they tend to be the first ones to tell you that the current stuff isn't as "authentic" as the old stuff.

0
David Hepworth | 17 February 2010 - 9:33am

I'm delighted

to stand corrected.

0
Captain Underpants | 17 February 2010 - 9:38am

They remind me..

..of Give Out But Don't Give Up era Primal Scream. I thought that record was great when it came out in my mid twenties, now it just looks and sounds like comical Rock n Roll posturing and I can't believe I fell for it. If I was 26 now I'd love Kasabian and think it was uncool to have a mortgage. It's just where you're at I guess.

1
Prestonia | 17 February 2010 - 9:35am

Give Out But Don't Give Up

Listen to it again and try and strip away preconceptions and images.

It's their best record IMO. The best album the Stones never recorded.

Excluding "Rocks" obviously.

Didn't catch the Brits last night, the allure of Milan v Man Utd was too great but I caught Kasabian at Wembley Arena in November. As a jaded 40 year old, I thought they were great. Certainly a cut above the usual landfill indie.

0
Six Dog | 17 February 2010 - 9:45am

The worst song titles on any album ever...

Jailbird, Rocks, (I'm Gonna) Cry Myself Blind, Funky Jam, Big Jet Plane, Free, Call On Me, Struttin', Sad And Blue, Give Out But Don't Give Up, I'll Be There For You, Everybody Needs Somebody.

You somehow know you're not going to get "Trout Mask Replica" when you pick that up.

By the way, a mortgage is only ever be cool when you've paid it off, and by that time you're be too old to be cool anyway.

0
Pax Romana | 17 February 2010 - 5:34pm

Actually I take that back..

..what I should have cited is Primal Scream's entire career.

1
Prestonia | 17 February 2010 - 9:37am

hmmm....

....surely "Higher Than The Sun", "Inner Flight", "Star" and "Burning Wheel" are in another league from Kasabian. The Scream do flit between the sublime and the ridiculous but when they're on form they really can be quite special.

1
walker182 | 17 February 2010 - 8:39pm

I'm confused

Who's this Serger chappie at 3'20"? I only saw Noel Fielding had done a Jarvis and jumped on stage to swipe the mike.

Not sure about his new look goatee though.

Was that Freddie Flintoff on lead vocal and does Jimmy Tarbuck know he's missing a jacket?

0
Ahh_Bisto | 17 February 2010 - 9:46am

I am so bored of rock spectacle...

Years ago I would go and see a band like Genesis or Pink Floyd and spend most of the gig going "Woooow" at the amaaazing lights and flying porkers. But then something changed in me (possibly at the same time as I started to develop rogue ear hair) and I started to long for entertainment that was presented in a more down-to-earth fashion. Rock n' roll needs to find a new visual language; the old one has become a bunch of meaningless cliches.

0
Patrick Crowther | 17 February 2010 - 9:50am

Maybe we just need to start

mining hitherto forgotten sets of cliches. I'd go for the "charity shop banghra wear with twin sax" look, myself if I wanted to stand out from the crowd...


0
Pax Romana | 17 February 2010 - 5:46pm

I like it.

This always get cranked up in the car when it comes on the radio. They'll have a crackin' greatest hits album in a few years time.
'A shit time to be young' ? When you can have instant access to your favourite songs and listen to them whenever you want, plus see your favourite bands live, a different one every day of the week it's seems AND you can watch their new video on your phone/home computer /telly as and when you want to, PLUS you have the whole of recorded history to explore and enjoy! Yeah, you're right, it sounds shit.

1
ChaosandMorphine | 17 February 2010 - 10:00am

It used to be all fields round here....

Them guitars are too loud. The empire was a better place on rationing, I can tell you. When's that Gracie Fields wax pressing out? Any chance of a gatefold 78 in heavyweight shellac?

0
Six Dog | 17 February 2010 - 10:19am

There's only new music

so there can be new ring tones. (and knowing where that comes from means I'm not completely opposed to relatively recent developments in music, I hope).

Kids today (yeah, I know) will never know what it's like to have everyone in their class gathered round the radio to see if Going Underground got to number one, or all rush out and buy Sgt Pepper on the same day (the delicious pleasure of waiting for your favorite bands new album, studying the sleeve on the bus home) and babble excitedly about it the next day.

Nor will they walk through town on a sunny summer day and hear the same tune blasting out of every car window, so that whenever they hear it for the rest of their lives they remember the moment.

They won't see radically different acts, which might expand their musical taste, on the same TV show, which won't be watched by half the population.

Which of the songs performed on the Brits the other night will still be played in 30 years time? 10 years?

A different band every night? Oh, you must live in that London. £10 a ticket and £25 for the train doesn't work for me. I saw David Ford and Hannah Peel at The Haymakers in Cambridge last night but that's as near as they're coming to me. I live in Sussex.

I'll accept that they have the whole of recorded music to discover, but what a shame that it's a generation that doesn't have any music of its own to be proud of.

0
Captain Underpants | 18 February 2010 - 3:38pm

Another example of opinion

masquerading as fact, personal experience presented as the only true benchmark and the music of a generation damned by a David Ford fan.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 20 February 2010 - 4:19pm

Nope

Opinion expressed as opinion, like your views, the original post and every other comment on this site and pretty much the rest of the Internet. And other media. And conversations in the pub. Jeez.

As Hepworth said, kids are looking backwards for better music - now I'd draw from that that they're not convinced by manufactured pap like Kasabian. My inference, my opinion.

0
Captain Underpants | 20 February 2010 - 4:44pm

It's not an age thing

Coming into work this morning, the consensus was that Kasabian were really good last night. I was the only one to say I thought they were rubbish, and I'm the youngest in the office.

As pointed out on the Live Brits thread elsewhere, Kasabian are a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy of rock n' roll. In theory, they do everything right, but they're so devoid of charm, invention, spirit and ideas that it's disheartening. They're also really laddish - it's all "come on, let's 'ave it, lads, we're WELL mad for it".

Anyway, none of this means it's a bad time to be young and a fan of music. As pointed out in the mag before, the best time to be young is always now. While the music of 2010 isn't exactly stellar, there are some diamonds out there, plus there's the entire history of recorded music to catch up on, accessible 24/7 at the click of a few buttons. Sure, being young now means "you weren't there, man", but new music just means music that's new to you.

(EDIT: It appears the same point was made above as I was typing this. Great minds C&M, great minds)

Sorry, bit of a tangent there. Anyway, in summary, Kasabian are fucking dreadful.

3
Joe R | 17 February 2010 - 10:05am

A bit more

of the Pet Shop Boys in that woman's front room would have been good.

1
Prestonia | 17 February 2010 - 10:05am

Kasabian

are always going to split opinion. They're that kind of band. The fact that they can do this instead of provoking nothing more but quiet antipathy speaks volumes though.

For what it's worth, aside from 'Where Did All The Love Go', Kasabian - for me - died when Chris Karloff left. He is the Izzy Stradlin of Leicester.

... and I bought 'Give Out...' when I was 14 and thought it was pish. Except 'Funky Jam'. And R**ks. Of course.

0
Alex Gold | 17 February 2010 - 10:29am

Utter Arse Sir!

Everyone round here knows that it is Kev "Reverb" Bayliss and not "Johnny come lately" Chris Pratt, sorry, Karloff.

0
TedLoaf | 19 February 2010 - 12:19pm

I'm glad they exist

Because I find the skinny bloke very amusing. There's something about his NME-targeted look that clashes with the fact he's from Leicester.

It's a fun enough song, not really my cup of tea but it feels like a massive hit.

0
Mavis Diles | 17 February 2010 - 11:35am

Great point. Being from Leicester

was what made Englebert Humperdinck so tantalisingly incongruous.

1
Pax Romana | 17 February 2010 - 5:49pm

"The Look"

Is so Leicester.

0
TedLoaf | 19 February 2010 - 12:21pm

What would you like them to do?

They are a rock band in the noughties where instant success is demanded and time to grow not allowed. Despite that they have produced 3 successful albums and gathered a large live following and produce a great live show. They are on the Brits, why not, and they played a song they have written and performed it with a panache and a air of showmanship that was only bettered by Lady Gaga on the night.
Really, what would you have them do? What is so wrong that you can't even recognise their relevance to another generation? Please explain because if you can't even acknowledge Kasabians place in the world you might as well shut the door put on your latest box set and remain rooted in 1970 something when David Bowie sung songs about space dressed as a spaceman and was called a genius. (I have no problem with David Bowie by the way just the hypocrisy)

0
Dave Amitri | 17 February 2010 - 12:49pm

You took

the words right out of my mouth. They are hardly going to deconstruct "Fire" on mandolins and woodwind. Serge is great-looking (love the choice of a Rickenbacker) and, although the albums are patchy, the stand-out songs and singles always get turned up around Firefly Acres.

0
Rufus T Firefly | 17 February 2010 - 1:02pm

Errr

Not sure that pointing out the comic nature of their take on 'rawk' equates with being rooted in 1970.

Ironically, I actually think that their rock retreads with a modern, football terrace, post-Oasis swagger are an attempt to also appeal to the Dad-rock market. 'You know what son..they arent so bad..they remind me of Stones/Primal Scream/Arthur Brown [insert any other]'

Personally - I have all 3 albums and seen them live twice. I think that their desperation to succeed - nowt wrong with that, per se - is driving them creatively the wrong way.

1
tim tunes | 17 February 2010 - 3:58pm

Not quite sure where

the 70's thing came from myself actually I think it was a kind of generic dig at the people that can't accept that any new rock / guitar band is capable of having anything to offer. I still don't know what it is you expect from a noughties rock band and I will continue to wave Kasabians flag and wear my high waisted dad rock jeans with pride! My sons introduced me to Kasabian and already see them as yesterdays news.
Really surprised that you own the albums have seen them live and still see fit to call them a joke. What the hell I'm off to listen to some Lady gaga. "Can't read my, can't read my.........."

0
Dave Amitri | 17 February 2010 - 5:50pm

They have de-progressed

Liked first album, particularly those proggy tunes at the end like U-Boat

Second album was OK and saw them then. The second live performance was at a Festival - so a bit of a cheat. However, arranged to see them again with the third album coming around. Heard the third and just thought, good grief- that is too 'Spinal' for me - there are still loads of creative bands out there- in all genres, some mainstream/some niche. But not Kasabian. Theres no authenticity.

(LoveLady Gaga though :))

0
tim tunes | 17 February 2010 - 7:57pm

A curate’s egg of a band

They have the component parts of a good rock band, but something holds them back. They do have good tunes (Fast Fuse as shown below is a favourite of mine), and I sort of feel they are a band you could get behind – but they just stay as better than the average.

Remember reading a review of ”West Pauper…” and it was pointed out that one of the band saw the album as a narrative, and the other as just a collection of songs. Think that sums up why they won’t achieve greatness.

0
Reno Dakota | 17 February 2010 - 4:47pm

I liked their performance last night.

And I like Tim Lovejoy. That's him off Something For The Weekend, isn't it?

0
Iainso | 17 February 2010 - 5:56pm

I quite like Kasabian. My

I quite like Kasabian.

My wife and I were both students in 95-98 so we are lovers of the Britpop bands, though we don't really keep up with these modern young bands and my wife doesn't have a clue who Kasabian are!

They are the only youthful band I really keep up with. The live performances are generally electrifying and the lead singer (don't know his name) has a great rock n' roll swagger akin to a youthful Liam Gallagher. Kasabian entertain me and there's nowt wrong with that!

0
Carl Purkins | 17 February 2010 - 6:06pm

They have absolutely NOTHING

to say. That's their only problem. Aside from that they're okay. Ish.

0
Mr Fade | 17 February 2010 - 8:13pm

Something not quite right

I like some of their stuff but there's always a nagging suspicion that they do what they do painting-by-numbers style. I've never been able to shake this off.

1
ainsley009 | 17 February 2010 - 8:17pm

Kasabian: dull old bunch

Well I think Kasabian are a dull old bunch. But a friend of mine met them at a press shindig and said they were very nice boys. I do however like Tim Lovejoy and I am a regular viewer of Something for the Weekend.

0
RabbiRizzle | 18 February 2010 - 2:45pm

Once saw them

setting up for a lunchtime spot in Fopp in Nottingham. Made a fearful racket tuning up (if that's what bands do these days) so me, Mrs Preston 74 and junior in the pram beat a hasty retreat thus costing Fopp fifty quid or so which I probably spent in Selectadisc instead.
Brits, Awards - how meaningless have they become? Like the endless plethora of "Other team's coach's Man Of The Match" baubles that no nine-year-olds' footy match can be staged without dishing out a dozen or so of.
After the 60's when the NME had a Poll Winners' Party, say in the 70's, did anyone ever actually get a little plastic trophy for "Best Guitarist" etc, did anyone furthermore give a flying one?
One wonders whether, say, Rod, Tetsu and all the Faces have a little bloke with a guitar on a plinth for topping the "Thanks For The Live Album But You Needn't Have Bothered.." category with "Overtures and Beginners"
Far too much store set by these things
Oasis best album of last 30 years? Really? First one I've thought of off the top of my head - "Imperial Bedroom" - have Oasis ever really made a better album than that?

0
Preston74 | 18 February 2010 - 3:43pm

I wonder...

How many Kasabian fans actually know where they got their name from?

My housemate - quote 'best live band on the planet' *cough* *cough* didnt.

Loved the line about Jimmy Tarbuck missing a jacket

I notice that their first cd now competes for space with Travis, Killers and the last 4 Oasis albums in the pound section of my local 2nd hand record shop

Says it all really - music for indie kids who buy their cds in supermarkets, taken in by the lavish advertisments, a few listens and they realise its actually pretty crap, 2 singles and a load of filler.

See also Razorshite, Keane, Kooks, Fratellis etc etc

0
garspaceman | 18 February 2010 - 4:14pm

They always reminded me...

... of four blokes doing an impression of a rock band.

0
fist_of_onan | 18 February 2010 - 10:45pm

I watched that

with the feeling of waiting for something to start.

Nothing, for me, did. They had the riff, the drums and the hook. But none of them lit anything. Nothing about them sparked.

Rock music seems very flat these days and bands like Kasabian aren't doing enough to kick it. I don't wish to be negative about them - I want to like them. I enjoy that 'sound' but ultimately they just do not pull on anything inside me.

0
Beezer | 18 February 2010 - 11:11pm

I've been listening to rock music..

..since 1970, and I can put my hand on my heart and say that this is quite the dullest thing I've seen since the last British rock band I saw.
There hasn't been a truly great British band since The Smiths..been a couple of good ones mind.

0
shane pacey | 19 February 2010 - 12:28pm

I like them but

Serge banging on about how fanatstic they are takes the shine off.
Stop telling me how good you are.
The truly great bands do not tell you how good they are. They don't need to.

1
Blue Sky | 20 February 2010 - 11:54am

Derivative

I've always found them too derivative and uninspired. Have they had an original thought or tune? That said, they are much better live than they sound in the studio and I probably would've liked them 15 years ago as a Britpop band. Nowadays my favourite bands are The Felice Brothers, Conor Oberst and all things Americana. On a more general point, the Brits has never said nothing to me about my life!

0
pgknights | 20 February 2010 - 1:56pm

"1)The stage prop for

"1)The stage prop for 'Fire'? Some Fire"

Well, what would you have used?

0
Andy Lynes | 20 February 2010 - 2:18pm

Strip it down

No fire, no horn section, no backing singers - swap in back projections

Strip it down to show a hungry lean rock band - they would though also need a new tune

0
tim tunes | 20 February 2010 - 3:01pm

Nah.

They're just uninspired to the nth degree. I also strongly suspect of them being thick as two short planks. - nobody with any intelligence could write lyrics that pathetic. They're the musical equivalent of Scott Mills, completely lacking in wit, detail or anything whatsoever to say, and I don't care how good their live show is: if the music is this turgid and laddish, who cares how effectively they prance around a stage?

While I realise there are intelligent, clued-up people who like them, I don't understand it. They strike me as being for people who would like their friends to think of them as having credible taste, but buy two records a year, from the supermarket. Although I should clarify that buying two records a year, from the supermarket, doesn't make you a bad person unless you also have delusions of taste and like your mates to think of you as being all "indie". THEN you're a bad person. ;)

0
Bob | 20 February 2010 - 9:18pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd