even watching it, I can tell you it will be: heinous, bogus and extremely non-non-non awesome

Dude!

referring not to Axl but a former Autralian leader of the Labour Party was asked of the current Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard during the recent election campaign.

Her response was "some things are immeasurable"

now I've watched it and read the article, what the fu... was all that about?

back in 1991

which led to this

http://www.nme.com/news/guns-n-roses/52736

Amusingly, I note that if you look at the setlist 5 tracks consist of instrumental jams and extended solos from each band member including a piano solo from Axl....groooo!

How is this whining, irrelevant and tedious bunch of hasbeens anywhere near a headline spot at a major festival anyway?

That Axl Rose is actually an anagram. Of useless tosser.

fecking idiot. He has always treated his audience with disdain and this proves he hasn't changed. Good luck to those who have shelled out to see them later this year.

commit career suicide before they actually die?

...that a band capable of such monstrously good hard rock as "Appetite For Destruction" should a) piss every drop of their talent up a large wall (presumably built out of heroin-flavoured bricks) and b) squander all the goodwill still afforded them by people who remember what they used to be capable of.

I can live with them making exclusively shit records since their debut: nobody stays good for very long. I can't live with how dreadfully that little arsehole treats absolutely everybody else who has a stake in his career: band members, security guards, managers, even record companies - and most of all, fans.

What a prick.

how Guns 'n' Roses seem to have had such a critical rehabilitation, as theirs was the sort of rock that was surely best left in the 80s: huge hair, needless guitar solos and crap posturing.