Entertainment For Lively Minds
Just finished reading One Day
Posted by Merv on 8 June 2010 - 2:08am.
Is anyone else really looking to the 364 sequels?
- More from Merv.
- Login or register to post comments
Entertainment For Lively Minds
Is anyone else really looking to the 364 sequels?
One day
I thought it was absolutely marvellous. Well written, funny, poignant. I have a theory that this book appeals more to males than it does to females and in particular will appeal to fans of high fidelity.
Top notch - a Word (Word of Mouth) success
It's a Word success for me. The first time I had heard of it was when I read Tracey Thorne on Word of Mouth saying how much she enjoyed it. I looked at it in Smiths and then couldn't put it down. My wife then put it on her list at Book Group as a light alternative and it was selected. Now there are 15 more copies sold - next week is judgement day but early comments are very favourable.
Excellent
Truly wonderful writing; so easy to read yet so full of detail and insight that you feel you actually know these characters. Dexter's character in particular is superbly written - he is introduced as such a superficial, obnoxious person that to make you care about his subsequent life takes incredible skill.
And there was one point (those who've read it will know what I'm talking about) where I had to simply stop, put the book down and draw breath before I could continue.
I'm afraid I can't confirm your High Fidelity theory, Steve - I've never got on with Nick Hornby's books. They seem to glorify male pettiness and obsession without really explaining it (though my opinions could be influenced by the fact that I have no interest in football yet everyone kept telling me I'd like Fever Pitch even so; they were wrong, and his description of his love of the game left me cold and uninvolved).
Interesting...
...because I don't like football, and yet love Nick Hornby. I've never bothered with Fever Pitch, though. Why would I?
On the male pettiness thing, I think he does explain it, but not very explicitly. His obsessed male characters are terrified of their own feelings, so they hide in the minutiae in the hope that the minutiae will express them better than they can themselves. My two favourite of his "silly boy" characters - Rob in "High Fidelity" and Duncan in "Juliet, Naked" - are both like that. All of their articulacy and passion is siphoned into pop music, because the stakes are so much lower. No-one's going to leave you for passionately and honestly expressing your feelings about Solomon Burke, but they might leave you for passionately and honestly expressing your feelings about the state of your relationship. So they stick to Solomon, or The Clash, or the fictional Tucker Crowe. Much safer.
If you haven't already, I can heartily recommend both "Slam" and "A Long Way Down". The former is written for teenagers, and it's about teenage pregnancy, but it's funny and warm and sweet and beautifully observed. The latter isn't quite like his other books: it's a multiple-narrator affair, and surprised me quite a lot.
FWIW, I'm not keen on "About A Boy" or "How To Be Good": I thought he was slightly running on autopilot there.
Maybe I've been harsh on him
You've made me think that I ought to give him another go. I've only read Fever Pitch and High Fidelity and found them quite similar in tone and justification of anal behaviours (ummm... Freudian as opposed to scatalogical meaning intended here). But perhaps I was harsh.
I like your interpretation of it all as displaced passion and fear of self-esposure; I probably read it at a surface level, perhaps because I found him annoying before I'd even started the books. Which makes me wonder why I bothered in the first place - he was never going to get a fair reading.
I shall look out for the two you recommend and give him a second chance (I bet Hornby's so grateful now).
Well....
...if you end up still disliking him, I'll look like a knob, but hey. That's the price of recommending stuff. Enjoy!
Actually, I thought it was a bit like a Big Mac
Very easy to get through and enjoyable at the time, but not of huge substance. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed reading it, just felt it was a superior airport novel; sort of an anglicized, straight version of Tales from the City. It is just not a work of great fiction, nothing wrong with that I suppose.
I also think that about Nick Hornby's work as well....but more so.
absolutely with you there
Took it with me on a flight to Oz, after recommendations in the mag.
Really enjoyed it, couldn't put it down, did indeed have a read and re-read moment when *that bit* happened, but...
...don't think it is a work of great fiction, or says too much to be about 'the human condition' (ahem). Ripping Yarn, describes it best, I think. And I say that as somone who has recommended it to a lot of people.
It holds a particularly special place for me because my family adore and visit Filey annually....
I loved it!
Couldn't put it down....finished it in 2 days.
I am currently reading
this as my 'in the glove compartment for waiting at the school gates' book. Reading it, therefore, in small chunks. All very easy to read, witty, and enjoyable but I can't help but feel it is written with one eye very firmly on the TV serialisation market. Just as much of Hornby's seems to be.
Opinion shared, one goes in search of one's overgarment.
I read it one go on the plane to Montreal
A real page turner, and so true about how lives go after leaving university.
I couldn't get past the main character being called Dexter though. No one British and born in the Sixties was called Dexter were they?
I can think of one
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexter_Fletcher
Not great literature
but no worse for that. I tried reading Sarah Walters Little Stranger but found she was far too ponderous in descriptive prose and it was clear she was straining to be literate. The best authors do it with ease. Ishiguro for example will draw you in with very detailed narrative of a time, place or person but never uses one word too many.
I enjoyed One Day because it was well written with a keen observation for the trends throughout the 20+ years of the story. It had humour and poignancy in abundance and not many people can manage that compellingly in the same novel. I agree that it is perfect for the screen but have no idea whether David Nicholls set out with that intention although given his employment history I suspect he did.
Loved it
I read this on my summer holiday last year and absolutely loved it. Like many others I devoured it in a couple of days. I was avoiding some typical August weather in Scotland at the time.
I feverishly recommended it to Mrs eddie who read it and ... errr .... moved on. So unimpressed was she that I found it on her bedside table several months later about to start it again - she had forgotten she had read it. Chances of a recommendation to her bookgroup look slight.
I then passed it on to a good friend of mine who offered a similar lukewarm review. What were these people thinking??
My copy is now with my sister in law. I fear I may have hyped it again and will be met with a similar reaction.
I'm not sure I agree with the casting of Anne Hathaway for the forthcoming film. But then again I kept thinking of Dexter Fletcher for Dex so what do I know.
Just finished reading this
and really enjoyed it. I found it really touching, but also laugh out loud funny in parts. It has stayed with me for a while, which for what is essentially 'popular fiction' is a great achievement.
Would highly recommend to anyone who is heading off somewhere to do nothing this summer. This will fill 2 days, and stay with you for a lot longer.
It's OK
and there are some laugh (and cry) out loud moments, but for me it was nowt special. Mrs L started to read it and gave up after a couple of chapters. Not a patch on Starter for Ten imho.
Finished it at lunchtime (started it on Saturday)
Loved it. Couldn't put it down. Repeatedly made me laugh out loud, think about my own life and Have Emotions.
For all that it's easy to read, it rang far truer than most bolted-together, prize-eyeing literary fiction...
Finished It a week or so ago.
It's a well written occasionally Poignant novel.As for a film treatment,well I believe It would work much better on Television.It's episodic structure seems to fit the latter rather than the former.
Is everyone in the massive reading this?
The same as the rest of you I guzzled this down in about two days a week ago. It's a touching, well written piece of popular literature which had me laughing and crying (a bit, I'm not a wuss you know). I'm also amazed that I empathized with a tosser like Dexter. Emma is quite possibly the loveliest creation in fiction for years.... Good recommendation Word people. That's why I subscribe, I'd probably never had picked this up otherwise...
eddie I agree
That's just atrocious! I know she can do a good English accent and has lots of merits.. but no way is she anything like Emma!
I've googled Jim Sturgess who's playing Dexter and he doesn't look right either. Surely Jude Law was born for this part?
Was really enjoying it until...SPOILER ALERT
Look away now if you've not read it....
...just near the end when you know what happened. It reminded me so much of the last series of Cold Feet that David Nicholls wrote that I thought it something of a cop-out and wondered if he'd recycled a few bits of rejected script from those days. I was hoping for a more intriguing finish to what was an interesting but undemanding holiday read.
Yes
I wondered if that might be a direction for him to take the story but thought that no way he'd do the same as Cold Feet. Made it all the more surprising, a double bluff.
Thanks again Massive
The FPO and myself really enjoyed this on our recent hols. It is always strange though when reading fiction set in your backdoor.