Entertainment For Lively Minds
Jagger At The Grammies
Posted by walker182 on 18 February 2011 - 2:57pm.
I'm still undecided as to whether this was very good or very bad. Please help...
- More from walker182.
- Login or register to post comments
Entertainment For Lively Minds
I'm still undecided as to whether this was very good or very bad. Please help...
No probs
It's very, very, bad.
..thanks... I thought so..
...just wasn't sure what with it being a tribute to Solomon Burke and all...
Happy to help
.
Neither
Just very funny.
Stone Alone
Now - if only Bill Wyman could have moved like that when he was in the Stones!
I never realised
there were so many syllables in 'everybody' or 'ev-AH-ree-bahh-a-dee-uh'.
That was cringe-makingly embarrassing.
It's a
standard issue Jagger performance these days, very choreographed, vey mannered and designed to show off that at 67 he can still strut his stuff, which in fairness he can. I'm a life long Stones fan so I will always have love in my heart for Mick and "the boys", but Jagger needs to loosen up a little and be a bit more y'know...spontaneous.
The only man
in the world that can find another way to say the word 'you'
Is this...
...another 'Monkeys Dressed as Famous People' thread?
Forgive me
but I originally misread this as 'Jagger at the Grannies'
About time too, I thought.
i also made a token effort to find...
... some WAGs in their jammies, but i failed
Dear, oh dear...
That is the most embarrassing thing I've seen for a long time. Dad dancing. Dad singing. Unbelievably dreadful.
Voices go, don't they?
His voice has had it, by the sounds of it.
Donovan, to name a chap of a similar vintage is the same. He used to sing nicely, but these days he sounds like a warbling pixie. Oddly similar to Jagger there.
It happens, doesn't it?
He had a good innings, didn't he? considering he's been repeating himself for the past 30 years. If not longer.
oh
dear
Does he do...
Let's Work?
When the backing band
is more interesting than the front man you know Jagger's had it.