Is Camille the most exciting thing in pop music just now?

She writes the most original songs in two languages, she can out-sing Mariah hilariously if she chooses, she can out-dance Kylie, she's weirder than Bjork and more natural than the lot of them. OK, I'm a fortysomething man and she's a 30-year old women possessed of a fine voice and an uncommon beauty, but let's get over that, she is a fine artiste.

But when you see her live - dancers, vocalists, beat-boxers - it all makes sense in a show that is funny, exciting, moving and exudes sheer joy like nothing I've seen for years - makes guitar-based rock bands look cynical and outdated.

Don't be put off by the 'French Bjork' comparisons. Or even the records for that matter, the early ones of which can take a little getting into, but they make a lot more sense when you see her live.

Fact is, no other act has seemed fresher or had me more optimistic about music for years.

Can I get a witness? Or if not, what, musically speaking, has got you genuinely excited of late?

She's certainly very talented

but I think she should stop trying to impress so much and get on with making decent records. As one reviewer put it; easy to admire, hard to love.

Simon Ford | 30 October 2008 - 10:16am

Confusion reigns

My mate booked to see her, only to find himself experiencing an Irish songstress of the same name. Surely time for a The London Suede type name change to avoid punter confusion?

itf | 30 October 2008 - 12:27pm

no..

she's pants!

Stevegc | 30 October 2008 - 7:14pm

Just me then

No accounting for taste!

Bigsby | 31 October 2008 - 10:59pm