Indie music and decline of musical miscegenation
I know it sounds a bit like a PhD thesis but does anyone out there read the New Yorker (thought not...) or more specifically Sasha Frere-Jones? I'm not sure if this is for discussion in Word magazine (!) but it's worth a read (and there's an associated podcast)
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/musical/2007/10/22/071022crmu_musi...
It's something I've had at the back of my mind for a while. Isn't most indie music coming from folk/white rock roots nowadays? Whatever happened? Where did the sexiness go? Are there any great black/white crossover acts left (Andre 2000?). Certainly not Arcade Fire or the Decemberists...
- More from Paul Thompson.
- Login or register to post comments








Miscegenation for the nation
The Go! Team are a multicultural gang who chuck everything in; old school hip-hop, indie guitar, Japanese pop, cheerleader chants, Charlie Brown piano etc, etc. It sounds like a GCSE music project on the verge of collapse, but it's done with such innocent, youthful gusto that you can't help but cheer them on. Their first album is highly recommended; it'll take years off you.
Interestingly...
There are probably more black people in indie than ever before: Kele from Bloc Party, Tunde from TV On The Radio, Murray Lightburn of The Dears, Lightspeed Champion. And while none of them make particularly black-influenced music, that's to miss the point of the article. Because, unlike 70s rock, indie's never been particularly black-influenced, taking most of its cues from the Velvets and the Byrds. And as for where the sexiness went: was it ever there in indie music?
Indie and MOBO
Sorry, I haven't read the article but... The only relationship between indie and MOBO that I can recall now was that in the 1980s former indie bands would embrace soul music as a way of displaying maturity and getting out of the indie rut they thought they were in. Examples: Orange Juice in their second album (having a black funky drummer helped), Scritti Politti and I suppose Paul Weller by disbanding The Jam (an indie-before-indie band) did by getting funky with the Style Council.
Sexiness exists in indie still, more than ever in fact, especially if you regard artists like Franz F, Interpol, Pete Doherty, Strokes as 'indie'.
White Liberal Guilt
We're seeing it again. Why take apart Indie music? Instead, let's take a long look at the creative, moral and social bankruptcy that the current "Black" music scene foists upon it's audience.
Who said it was Indie Musics responsibility to carry "soul" to their white audience? I don't hear many black artists espousing the ethos and political commitment of Fugazi!
And who says..
The Decemberists don't have "Soul"?
Haven't we progressed beyond this?
Arcade Fire are Hitlers Youth (joke joke joke)
You right! Huzzah! Here's a merit!
I often thought that ''Arcade Fire'' has something of the Nazis about them.
They are straight laced, puritanical Aryan folk. I know that they try to fabricate a heretic nature within there lyrics, but we know that behind closed doors there flying the Confederate flag with exultant pride.
Probably kiss each page of ''Mein Kampf'' too.
A few more logs on the fire
I thought Green of Scritti Politti summed up Arcade Fire quite well in the Guardian a couple of months ago:
"People who enjoy this album may think I'm cloth-eared and unperceptive, and I accept it's the result of my personal shortcomings, but what I hear in Arcade Fire is an agglomeration of mannerisms, cliches and devices. I find it solidly unattractive, texturally nasty, a bit harmonically and melodically dull, bombastic and melodramatic, and the rhythms are pedestrian. It's monotonous in its textures and in the old-fashioned, nasty, clunky 80s rhythms and eighth-note basslines. It isn't, as people are suggesting, richly rewarding and inventive. The melodies stick too closely to the chord changes. Win Butler's voice uses certain stylistic devices - it goes wobbly and shouty, then whispery - and I guess people like wobbly and shouty going to whispery, they think it signifies real feeling. It's some people's idea of unmediated emotion. I can imagine Jeremy Clarkson liking it; it's for people in cars. It's rather flat and unlovely. The album and the response to it represent a bunch of beliefs about expression and truth that I don't share. The battle against unreconstructed rock music continues."
That usually gets a reaction!
I agree and disagree
Even though I liked (not loved) both AF's albums, Green's argument is so well-put that it is hard to disagree... My problem with them is that they are so exhausting to listen to, I actually feel worn-down by the end of each album.
A split vote in our house
The response to Arcade Fire seems to hinge on how their unquestioned intensity strikes different people. I love it, myself, but I'm the sort of person who enjoys Peter Hammill's overwrought rock-operatics. Though I did smell a faint rat when Win smashed that glass panel on the Jonathan Ross show. It seemed a bit self-consciously staged. My wife, however, finds them rather wearing, summing it up as "They seem to be trying a bit *too* hard".
The all-consuming vocals can
The all-consuming vocals can get wearing on the ears, and prompt recollection of the beleaguered growl of Supremacist rallying.
Once attended one of these functions in days of yore, and the vehement crys are the same as Wins. Though, turning this round and relating to the original subject...Winehouse is an obvious cross-over artist, along with The Go! Team and Admin Franks. So black/white that there almost a grey baby.
P.s. Attended for observation, not advocation.
A discussion myself and Andrew Harrison have had in the past...
is about a (fairly drunken) theory of mine that all rock/pop music of worth has an audible Black root, whether it's blues, soul or jazz (excepting indigenous folk musics, obviously). Basically it has to swing to work (ducks head, and reaches for tin hat now).
Grant; hip hop (and Black music)'s moral bankruptcy is an interesting topic - the most popular hip hop at the moment is, by and large, lyrically bereft and musically moronic. But, I'd suggest that an awfully large amount of 50's and 60's R n B and early rock n roll was also fairly stupid ('Come on Let's Turkey Hop', anyone?) The hip hop that, in twenty years time, people will remember, artists like Little Brother, Kids In The Hall, Saigon, and yes, probably Kanye West, has a bit more substance than the latest gangsta shoot 'em up.
Well, it's a theory..
..but seeing as all pop/rock music wouldn't exist without black roots, even if it strays a million miles from that root, then it's fairly specious.
It's almost impossible to "swing" with programmed drums, so that rules out most rap/hip-hop (Except The Roots)I have no problem with the stupidity of hip-hop, more with the violence, worship of material gain and bullish sexuality that litters its output.
Rock music is itself in an equally parlous state, with lads and lasses pilfering their dad's record collections and bringing nothing new to the party.
A new musical revolution? At this late stage, I think not.
Thankfully there is still a plethora of great music being released and re-released.
By and large I'd agree
but I do believe that R' n R', like any artform was in its infancy during the 50's and early 60's, developing as (specifically) US society progressed - i.e. Civil Rights Movement, JFK, "Great Society", Vietnam, RFK.Increasingly it came to reflect the concerns and passions of it's audience and grow in cultural content as well as political / social commentary. That Black Music ( what term do we use now-it's all getting a bit confusing!)has failed to develop beyond Public Enemy in terms of content and created very few albums of lasting importance and relevance bears testimony to the shallowness of the music form. While Arcade Fire can be criticized for lack of invention (musically) it's difficult to not argue that they've touched upon the Zeitgeist lyrically.
Perhaps I'm just too closed off and in the words of South Park's Stan to Token "I don't get it".
Although I don't agree with
Although I don't agree with Jones's examples, I do think he's got a good point here. Black music has traditionally tended to be about the human voice. "Indie" (God, what a preposterous term that is) on the other hand is all about the attitude. You could swap the singers of most of the bands playing night time Radio One and it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference. And Green's very good, isn't he? Makes me realise why I like the Arcade Fire in short blasts.Â
I'd be more inclined..
..to support Green's criticisms if he wasn't responsible for some of the twinkiest music of the last 20 years..all sped-up vocals and crap drum machine patterns.
But as for The Arcade Fire, it's all a bit too much for me, busy and angst ridden.
..and let's be honest, much as we love 'em, The Decemberists are really this century's Caravan. Prog rock that's read a few smarter books.
Hadouken!
This same debate is raging in the NME office...but it has manifested itself in the form of ''grindie'' band Hadouken!. The lead singers grime star aspirations and inner city sensibilities (acquired from a copy of ''Haster Magazine'' borrowed from a boy he shares the Squash courts with) have made old milk-bottle arms a source of ridicule amongst ''yoofs''.
The new-rave equivalent of a death-metal ephemerist getting a Viking Warrior tattooed on his emaciated back.
Balding Rock Stars
Talk about bald(ing) rock stars reminded me of a quote from Brian Eno's diary of 1995 - A Year with Swollen Appendices:
21 December:
‘…At the party, Rob Partridge said to me, "You gave hope to other balding men." My new epitaph: "Co-wrote a couple of decent songs and went bald shamelessly."'
Wrong Thread
Sorry - posted this in the wrong thread. My apologies.