Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

In a world where all music is free...

Niks's picture

Having downloaded Spotify and got that small-boy-in-a-sweetshop feeling I'm wondering where all this is leading.
CD sale are falling, record shops are closing, music is being downloaded illegally everywhere and there's no way anyone can stop it. Add in a way anyone can stream any music for free (although, crucially, not yet on your ipod) and the inevitable conclusion is surely that all music will soon be free.
So how will this change the way we listen to music?
For me personally I'm worried that it will mean I never listen to the same album twice. As there's a gigantically enormous amount of albums I have access to I will stupidly actually try and listen to them all. This will eliminate that phenomenon whereby you download an album or buy a CD, listen to it once and decide it's not great and then rediscover it again a year later via shuffle or after a CD shelf clearout and find that it's amazing (some examples for me personally include The Shins, Bon Iver and Sufjan Stevens).
But it will also be a great leveller. All of a sudden the tiniest little obscure act will be just as accessible as Jay Z or Robbie Williams or Girls Aloud. And because it's all free there'll be no reason for record companies to spend money promoting any of it.
To be honest, it’s starting to make my brain hurt a bit just thinking about it.

0

Me Too!

It's a brave new world we are moving into. Non of us know where it will lead to next, or how it's gonna change things. Exciting though, isn't it?!

0
ChaosandMorphine | 21 January 2009 - 12:46pm

Too much music

There's too much choice in the world generally.

My wife and I don't argue about who gets who's way - we argue over whose turn it is to *decide* what to eat/ what to watch/ listen to etc etc

I feel the same about music. I'd rather go to the pub with one or two mates and have a really good chat than be forced into a massive party where I have to mingle and have about twenty really superficial, boring, quick chats which have enriched my life not a jot

0
Chimney Singing... | 21 January 2009 - 12:50pm

Saying

there is too much music is like saying there is too much air.
You don't have to take it all in at once.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 21 January 2009 - 1:18pm

No but...

...don't you miss that process of finding out about an album, going into town and hunting it down, bringing it home and living with it?
I think the problem lies in too much choice, it's all too throw-away now. There's no value on it.
The albums and songs that I've loved over the years are the ones I've learnt from track 1, side 1 and lived with. Grazing endless downloads and Spotify (I did sit and flick through about 60 songs last night, not really settling on anything) just engenders that browsing.

0
Mr Drayton | 21 January 2009 - 1:44pm

Absolutely...

I couldn't agree more. If something is free I feel it has less value than if I have to pay for it. That's why I will continue to buy CDs. And in my opinion there is too much music... these days one has to trawl through so much crap to get to the good stuff.

0
Patrick Crowther | 21 January 2009 - 1:56pm

You are...

...Sir Patrick Spends :-)

0
nicktf | 21 January 2009 - 4:48pm

The Mind Boggles

Combine Spotify with universal wireless broadband and mobile internet phone type device and you don't need ipod - you cut out the downloading part of the process, which is the inconvenient bit.

0
Sven Garlic | 21 January 2009 - 1:02pm

Indeed.

Although I would use it in a different way myself, more as another tool to augment rather than replace. But no doubt there are millions out there who will use it as you have described.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 21 January 2009 - 1:13pm

Spotify and an iPhone or ipod touch

would be, potentially, very interesting. Or get it to sit on a squeezebox, Then I would pay to subscribe.

0
Leedsboy | 21 January 2009 - 3:35pm

Nice In Niche

What I've noticed amongst myself and my friends is that we aren't investigating new music as much as we used to. Some of that is our age, but a lot of it is the amount of music that is available to us these days.

Greater availability of music, both by fair means and foul, means that I can hear songs that I only read about previously and investigating a particular genre takes you down a lot of long and winding roads. Those little avenues take up too much of my time to really bother with any other types of music at this point. For instance I'm a huge soul and reggae fan. But the huge amount of music produced over the years means there is a so much to listen to that it almost becomes impossible to be anything but a soul and reggae listener. That is if I want to listen to music properly, the way I always have and not just have it as background music.

So before I was a music fan. I considered my tastes to be wide ranging and I knew what was going on in the world of music. I knew who the new bands were, I knew what the old bands were doing. Now, I'm primarily a soul and reggae fan, and mostly of the 60s and 70s varieties. Occasionally I break out and go through a different phase: perhaps The Clash or The Kinks or a week of early 90s dance music. But I keep finding myself going back to the Motown, the Stax, the Trojan and the Studio One. Nice here!

0
SimonL | 21 January 2009 - 1:10pm

I'm impressed with Spotify

I'm impressed with Spotify but I'm trying to use it as an audition process for purchasing things on iTunes - sometimes it's so hard to judge a song on those 30 second snippets. Still, there's a nagging part of my brain that thinks this may be the beginning of turning music into the audio equivalent of the Weimar Republic's worthless, market-flooding currency.

0
Nick_Setchfield | 21 January 2009 - 1:46pm

Too much information

A person of my acquaintance downloads all of his music from illegal sites. He gains considerable satisfaction from the fact that he's getting all this stuff for free and has openly stated that he would not buy new music even if he really liked it and - by some fluke - couldn't get it through other means.

His iPod is stuffed with music that he has listened to briefly on the internet and then downloaded but because there is so much of it he has practically no idea what any of it is. It's just music, sounds, the thing that comes out of his iPod. On occasion he'll remember a song he really liked but can't remember who it is by or what it was called. I wonder if he even enjoys listening to music. I get the impression that he prefers the mild thrill of knowing he can get whatever music he wants, when he wants, for free to the activity of listening to it.

In other words, he doesn't care about the music he's downloading and so the overwhelming amount of choice is not a problem. Instead, the choice has become the point. Where it comes from, who is playing it and - out on a limb here - what it means, is utterly irrelevant.

0
Con Coleman | 21 January 2009 - 1:57pm

I used to know a similar type of person re. films...

... he was a professional programmer and hobby hacker, knew all the hidden sites where all the new films were available, downloading at least one a day, and this was about 8 years ago, so way before everybody was doing it... his biggest coup was getting the Tim Burton version of "Planet Of The Apes" 2 weeks before it was released in US cinemas, the point being that it was getting it first that was important, not the quality of the film.

And the thing was, I've never met anyone less interested in films than this guy - they were just ways to fill up 2 hours between chatroom sessions, or something to do while he was eating or on the 'phone... and yes, I can see this happening with music too. I'm an old git with a good old fashioned record collection, and use my iPod as I would a Walkman, except with the equivalent of a suitcase full of CDs, i.e. I still listen to albums repeatedly in their entirety (though I also love playlists and shuffling too.) Younger people who won't have that connection to the album format (as we understand it) will be wading through an endless compilation of free music, and I can never see it having that same resonance as it has for past generations...

0
Metal Mickey | 21 January 2009 - 3:24pm

I occasionally catch myself thinking like that...

For the last 2 or 3 years, I've had my iTunes jukebox on pretty much all the time when I'm at home and a few times recently I've caught myself thinking that maybe having music as a background is a bad thing.

There used to be a distinction between having Radio 4 on as aural wallpaper and actively *listening* to music but since the advent of digital music (irrespective of from where it's bought) it's become too easy to just leave it playing.

I think I miss that distinction - maybe I need to stop leaving iTunes playing all the time and use the off button, saving it for when I want to *listen* to the music.

After a few years of luxuriating in the quantity of instant music, maybe I'm coming back to the idea of it being an occasional pleasure, to be thought about before listening.

0
stimpy | 21 January 2009 - 3:55pm

I see your point but

Surely different music is for different moods. When I'm working or I have freinds round for dinner and want something pleasant but not too distracting I listen to a mix of jazz, soul, ska and funk whereas singer songwriter stuff, traditional folk or hip hop is usually much better suited to a time when I can concentrate on it a bit more.

0
Niks | 21 January 2009 - 4:37pm

Well yes, but...

sometimes I just stick itunes on random, if I want an 'atmosphere' I'll select a genre and randomise within that.

0
stimpy | 21 January 2009 - 4:58pm

Personally

I welcome the new technology. All of the above posts make valid and interesting points, but I look at it as a trade off. Would I give up all the benefits of the last 10 or so years, mp3/iTunes/iPod, downloading and all the gains that come with these changes, to go back to a time where I spent hours searching for a particular album and then spent hours listening to it, 12" sleeves, listening through giant headphones in my bedroom (all wonderful things that I miss) etc. I'd say no, every time. If you find yourself unhappy with the way you consume music these days all you have to do is change your behaviour. The great thing about all of this is that you have the choice. Whether to use the technology to serve you, or to frustrate you, or to shun it all together and do things 'Old School' . How can that be a bad thing?

0
ChaosandMorphine | 21 January 2009 - 4:25pm
Sour Crout | 22 January 2009 - 10:04am

I'll be the last person buying CDs at this rate

I download from iTunes only for my kids and have never ever illegally downloaded anything. Not for goody-goody reasons just cos I like the product in my hands. Seems more special somehow.

0
kb | 22 January 2009 - 5:01pm

I bought...

4 cds today. I still like a physical product, especially if it's vinyl. Also, I'm a bit paranoid that all my downloads will get wiped (I have two external HDs just in case!). I do like spotify though and, like Niks, I also got that 'small-boy-in-a-sweetshop' feeling when I first used it! However, I still think that I'll continue buying cds and vinyl, although the days of browsing for them where I live are coming to an end!

0
humphreym | 22 January 2009 - 6:34pm

I'm with Patrick and Metal Mickey

Sorry if the header sounds like a Disney Channel film.

I rip most of the cds to the ipod and it's a bit scary when you look at how long you would take to listen to it all.

The ipods for out and about and the Griffin adaptor thing opened up a whole new world while driving, particularly audio books / podcasts/ radio shows.

However, I never play the ipod at home and when you've got the 20th album from a band, you want to put it next to the other 19 and a hard drive doesn't display welf on a shelf.

0
anythingcanhappen | 22 January 2009 - 11:32pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd