If he doesn't win, look out Letterman


That man just oozes charisma....

A witty and amusing speech that genuinely had me smiling in appreciation.

Scott Wilkinson | 17 October 2008 - 6:39am

Yes

I wonder who wrote it.

Archie Valparaiso | 17 October 2008 - 6:47am

Small point

I wish people would pronounce it FORmidable, rather than the ubiquitous forMIDable. But hey. I hope to God he wins. The planet Earth sure needs saving.

Lucas Hare | 17 October 2008 - 6:55am

There is a CONtroversy...

....about that pronunciation. Or is it a conTROVersy?

Retropath2 | 17 October 2008 - 9:20am

We'll

disTRIBute the options and see what's best.

Lucas Hare | 18 October 2008 - 7:21am

Obviously not Barack Obama but the fact he was prepared to

deliver it and in such style is impressive.

It's not too far fetched that Letterman did have something to do with it is it?

*A reply to Archie.

Scott Wilkinson | 17 October 2008 - 6:59am

Probably bits of a lot of people

With endorsements already in from everybody who's anybody in the smartass-one-liner business, from Woody Allen to Sarah Silverman, I suppose he's only a phone call away from any gag he needs.

McCain's face as the speech developed was a picture. From the forced smile at the start, by a few minutes in you could see him throw in the towel, face facts, and just enjoy listening to the next President of the United States like everyone else.

Archie Valparaiso | 17 October 2008 - 7:07am

I thought the same thing

Not sure if McCain had already spoken or was next up but I can imagine his next meeting with his staff:

"Give me jokes, I want jokes..."

Scott Wilkinson | 17 October 2008 - 7:15am

The other bloke

McCain was much funnier than I thought possible at the same event.

Fact: Obama's chief speechwriter is just 26 years old. Amazing.

Fraser Lewry | 17 October 2008 - 7:11am

I'm almost starting to feel sorry for McCain

Running against Dukakis, Mondale, Gore or Kerry, he'd have been a shoo-in.

Archie Valparaiso | 17 October 2008 - 7:22am

It's still anybody's election..

...but Obama, like Clinton, is at his most comfortable in front of crowds. Whereas McCain, like Bush and Brown, just isn't. You can have all the good lines in the world but if you can't deliver them with the required insouciance they don't work.

David Hepworth | 17 October 2008 - 7:20am

McCain

Is at his worst when he's in front of a crowd but the other guy is talking. Both at the Al Smith dinner and during the Presidential debates, Obama looked engaged and comfortable when he wasn't on the mic. McCain, on the other hand, tends to flit between bewilderment, irritation and impatience.

Fraser Lewry | 17 October 2008 - 8:08am

Test of a good actor

Can they look comfortable when they're not talking?

David Hepworth | 17 October 2008 - 8:18am

The same is true

of newsreaders when they work in pairs. Always watch the one who isn't speaking.

Fraser Lewry | 17 October 2008 - 8:27am

When I see....

...newreaders in pairs, I switch off (which explains why I rarely watch the news!). Why do we need them in pairs? Robert Dougall, Kenneth Kendall, Peter Woods, Richard Baker, Jan Leeming, even Peter bloody Sissons didn't need a partner. Please, lets go back to just reading the news!

Iain McKinney | 17 October 2008 - 9:19am

Dear old Peter Woods....

I looked on You tube for his classic removal mid programme for, um, "medication" related reasons, but couldn't find it.
Can anyone else post it from elsewhere?

Retropath2 | 17 October 2008 - 9:27am

It's not over till it's over

McCain's last ditch attempt to jazz up his presentation style might just pay off.


Fraser Lewry | 17 October 2008 - 10:18am

Fantastic

Only a couple of decades ago that would have been six months' work for Industrial Light and Magic. Now it's a throwaway visual gag on the Internet.

Archie Valparaiso | 17 October 2008 - 11:35am
Beany | 19 October 2008 - 9:58am