Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

I don't understand adverts

Melville's picture

I was watching TV the other night and the advert with the Meerkat talking like Borat came on for the umpteenth time – and it occurred to me that I have never noticed what it is trying to sell. Not just the product – but the type of product. So I concentrated and worked out that it was for an insurance company.

I had realised that the Michael Winner adverts are also for insurance, but never noticed the name of the company, until, again, I paid attention.

Now, I might not be the sharpest knife in the box, but doesn’t that make me an ideal target for advertisers? Is the prime goal of adverts is to amuse and impress the other advertising agencies, rather than get across the name of the product and what it does? Perhaps I should be grateful they do that instead of persuading me to buy stuff.

0

I don´t advert understanding.

0
Ola Claesson | 21 August 2009 - 2:23pm

Meerkats

That ad would appear to be even more confusing than you claim - it's not for an insurance company at all, but for a website that compares insurance quotes made by lots of different companies.

I agree with you though - give me a "Ronseal. It does exactly what it says on the tin" any day.

0
Fraser Lewry | 21 August 2009 - 2:31pm

I agree

With most of my television viewing coming from a PVR these days I rarely see television adverts but with the ones I do see I think I would agree with you. If you described a car advert to me I doubt I would know what the car was or even the make. Don't shout too loudly though otherwise we might lose most of out television channels.

0
JohnW | 21 August 2009 - 2:33pm

Sadly

the golden age of advertising has long gone. Shake and Vac I can still sing the words to, and the 'Bum bum bum bum Esso Blue' one, although admittedly that doesn't have as many words to it.

0
chabsy | 21 August 2009 - 2:38pm

Less than half a crown

At work the other day when we were trying to decide on a good number to use as a constant in a bit of code suggested 1001... and followed the suggestion with "Cleans a big big carpet"!

0
JohnW | 21 August 2009 - 3:06pm

"Compare the Meerkat dot com"

'Tis one of the best ad campaigns for many a moon.

0
kb | 21 August 2009 - 2:43pm

Iggy Pop

Sitting here trying to think which insurance company he is representing.....and I can't, despite the ad being on every few seconds, seemingly.

0
renkadima | 21 August 2009 - 2:44pm

I'm shocked

You mean it's not Iggy's own insurance company? I thought if I signed up then Iggy himself would have a few "words" with whoever stole my car, or drove into it or whatever. You've got to admit that would be a deterent.

0
paulwright | 21 August 2009 - 2:47pm

that's why when the plaudits

at the time here and elsewhere for the Iggy ad came out I was perplexed we all know Iggy sold out and sold insurance but no one came remember which company it is ergo a bad advert.

0
Chris G | 21 August 2009 - 4:15pm

Oddest current ad

Can anyone explain the car ad where the guy reacts to being sacked by singing with a terrifying blank-eyed intensity as he drives past a lorryload of sheep on their way to slaughter?
Something about not being a sheep any more because he doesn't have a job? He might be a metaphorical sheep but real sheep get killed and eaten? He doesn't have a job, but, hey, he's got music, he's got rythm, who could ask for anything more (And look! There are some sheep!)?
It has clearly snagged my attention enough to make me watch closely but a) I've no idea which car is being advertised (but I don't drive so no loss to them) and b) The only conclusion I have come to is that this ad is just odd.

0
Gatz | 21 August 2009 - 2:53pm

"So, like,

it's about brand engagement across a range of vertical and non-vertical touchpoints providing holistic and resonant cross-platform synergies - okay?"

"Great - but will I sell more beans"

"Um...."

0
Sheev | 21 August 2009 - 3:02pm

Just one thing

I know what you mean about flashy advertising that you don't associate with a particular product but if you were in the market for that kind of product at that time you would probably register it.

0
David Hepworth | 21 August 2009 - 3:45pm

Advertising works best

when it subliminally influences buyer behaviour. For example, I was trying to remember the name of a high street computer retailer (I had one of those post-40 inexplicable memory losses where as soon as I tried to think of the name it went). The only way I could bring it to mind was to sing, to myself, the theme tune: #Where in the world? ...).

The idea is that you don't remember the product until you need to. For example, you're in the supermarket faced with near-endless choice of washing powder. Your brain attempts to make a decision and uses what it has stored to pick one, and this could be from adverts you've seen. The idea behind the meerkat ad is that you would remember compare the meerkat and translate that into compare the market. Similarly, if you were buying a car then you would remember the subtle brand values transmitted by an advert rather than the ad itself. Even if you think they don't work just think about how you perceive different brands - chances are those perceptions were formed by their advertising and other promotional activity.

0
ceepee | 21 August 2009 - 3:52pm

Yes, some adverts do work

For example, the 118 118 adverts, which attract your attention by looking amateur and cheap (but are probably neither) have managed to ensure that it is the number I would dial if I needed directory enquiries. And the old Carling Black Label adverts managed to work the product name into the punchline of quite good jokes - I bet he drinks Carling Black Label - so everyone knew it. The meerkat ad is too elaborate, for me anyway, and loses the company name.

I don't want to write a thesis, but it's interesting that the trend on insurance, which we all have and is completely dull, is to make the adverts whacky - Iggy, the meerkats, Michael Winner.

0
Melville | 21 August 2009 - 5:05pm

When Alan Sugar talks sense

In The Apprentice there's always a task that requires teams to create an advert for some spurious product and every year at least one of the teams fails to put the product properly into shot in the advert, which riles Surallan no end.

Much as it pains me to admit it, his approach of making sure people can see the name, what it does and, if relevant, what it costs big, bold and upfront does seem to be pretty obvious.

How many companies genuinely do that?

0
robram | 21 August 2009 - 3:57pm

That's why Allan Sugars

a successful property developer.

0
Chris G | 21 August 2009 - 4:18pm

And it's sometimes the actual product, not the ad

Is it just me, or does anyone else find it bemusing why so many washing machine and dishwasher tablet manufacturers seem very coy about actually putting the purpose of their product on the front of the box?

I was utterly confused the first time I tried to buy dishwasher tablets, as I was stupidly looking for a box which said "dishwasher tablets" on the front.

The travails of 21st century man ...

0
Douglas | 22 August 2009 - 8:07am

The same is true of fabric softener

Nowhere on a bottle of Lenor are the words "fabric softener" used. In fact, there's nothing on the packaging that tells you what the product is. What's the thinking behind that?

0
Fraser Lewry | 22 August 2009 - 9:40am

Plus all the confusing different flavours

It could easily be a new brand of soft drink. It's my round - crushed silk and jasmine anyone? How soon before it reverts to it's American name Downy? Bloody Snickers...

0
Beany | 22 August 2009 - 10:16am

Oi! Brussels! No!

It might be something to do with the strict standards and definitions that define "fabric softener".
In one episode of "Q.I.", they made the claim (apparently confirmed by "The Margarine and Spread Association") that margarine cannot be bought in the UK.
This started a big argument amongst over-leisured people. You can search for "margarine" on, say, the Sainsbury's website, but on a tub of Stork, "margarine" is not mentioned and in the small print it's described as vegetable fat spread.

0
Nick White | 22 August 2009 - 10:24am

I don't want to understand adverts sometimes

I'm particularly unimpressed with the new Halifax ads in which they sycophantically try and give the impression that they're helping some chap propose to his girlfriend by giving him a helping hand climbing up to her office window: all accompanied by a suitably understated little acoustic song to make it "real". That they have the audacity to give the impression that as a bank they have my interests at heart is frankly insulting and worthy of reintroducing the stocks. Bring back Howard, at least you had a target you could focus your ire towards. Now it's all touchy feely and 'ooh we're lovely really, just like you you lovely customer you..go on hug us please'.

I've noticed a few companies have brought back some old adverts (Persil springs to mind) which I presume is a crafty way of covering over the fact that they've no money to spend on new adverts but that it's reassuring for us to know in these troubled economic times that we can still get whites whiter than white. Yeah, but my blues are still blue.

0
Ahh_Bisto | 21 August 2009 - 4:00pm

Re:Halifax. Hopefully Shazam has produced...

...multiple sales of Bright Eyes' I'm Wide Awake it's Morning, one of the finest albums of the 21st century.

0
kb | 21 August 2009 - 4:38pm

Advertising

I've been a graphic designer working in ad agencies for over 20 years and I still shake my head in disbelief at some TV adverts and what on earth hey are trying to get across with their adverts (and trust me I used to oversee production of DFS ads, and they are completely billy bollox!).

Best ones for me were the mad Tango ads (crazy happy slapping bhudda guy) and the Pot Noodle is a slag ads, which showed how some clients were brave for thinking outside the TV box and letting an ad agency go feckin' wild with their products!

Wish there were more to be honest, instead of horrible logo'd companies (confused.com the worst offender on TV at the moment) plying their grubby trade!

I'm off to lie down with the honey monster now...

0
über-über | 21 August 2009 - 4:08pm

Try adverts

with no spoken message or catchy tune that reveals what the product is. If you are blind and trying to get the gist of what is going on you are snookered. More Barry Scott.

0
Beany | 21 August 2009 - 4:31pm

Wrongity wrong

That meerkat ad is wrong on so many levels. Meerkats are native to southern Africa, so why does he have an eastern European accent? Why is he wearing a smoking jacket? Why would you need to compare meerkats? I just don't get it.

I'd never use a price comparison website anyway, whether it's meerkats or markets, so I don't care that the ad's lost on me!

0
EricPodeOfCroydon | 21 August 2009 - 4:32pm

"Why would you need to compare meerkats?"

I refuse to believe that that's a serious question.

0
Fraser Lewry | 21 August 2009 - 4:34pm

The main problem these days

IMO is there's just too many adverts about. I'm more than happy when Alexandrei Meerkat pops up as at least he's well made and also damn amusing. Cilit Bang! is still my fave though.

0
James Blast | 21 August 2009 - 4:36pm

Three


I mean, seriously: what is that all about, eh?

I am just waiting for some ad agency to finally run out of ideas and go the 'Tesco Value' route - a white screen, with a few words in big black bold lettering:

BOLD. IT GETS YOUR CLOTHES CLEAN. IT'S CHEAP. BUY IT, PLEASE.

0
Mark Bell | 21 August 2009 - 5:14pm

Ah

But Tesco Value packaging is sneakily designed to advertise other products. The reason for the cheap, ugly design that screams "I'm cheap" is to goad you into buying more expensive versions of the same thing, products that won't mark you out as not having money to spend on the basics.

The difference between the contents of a Tesco Value tin of baked beans and a regularly priced one is slight, but the price difference is great - and so Tesco end up getting shoppers to pay much more for basically the same thing. If the Tesco Value brand was much more subtly designed, and didn't shout "cheap" so loudly, people would take advantage of the prices, and actually buy less of the more expensive goods - but they don't want that.

0
Fraser Lewry | 22 August 2009 - 10:11am

Clever...

However, I am cheap; there's nothing wrong with a nice bottle of 'VODKA'.

0
Mark Bell | 25 August 2009 - 2:00pm

Interestingly,

"Value" ranges and supermarket own brand goods are actually bought by a mid to high range social group as they consider themselves "above" advertising and brand loyalties

Also, the supermarkets have started to introduce discounted ranges that are less obvioulsy delineated and do not scream "cheap" as much as previously.

There are now a range of low, mid and upper pricing points to choose from spread throughout the general display - rather than grouped together.

Fiendishly clever these supermarket types. And ruthless too.

0
Sheev | 25 August 2009 - 2:36pm

We are talking about it...

...so the advert works. Job Done

0
Andrew2 | 21 August 2009 - 6:17pm

The power of suggestion

Near the end of term, my 11-12 year old pupils suddenly started quoting from adverts that hadn't been shown since they were born. I asked them where they'd got all this from, and they told me it was the Thinkbox advert, so we watched it together on YouTube:


They thought the man was just saying random, silly things. So I spent the best part of a maths lesson showing them all the original adverts from which it had quoted. All became clear.

0
Nick White | 21 August 2009 - 8:40pm

where's the

math?

0
James Blast | 21 August 2009 - 11:05pm

The maths?

Oh. Yeah, well, it's media studies innit? Far more relevant.

0
Nick White | 21 August 2009 - 11:31pm

That Homebase ( ? )

tune, with the creepy whistling is rather scary. It reminds me of a DIY based Night Of The Hunter.

0
RobertC | 22 August 2009 - 9:46am

On the subject of ads

I had an email from The Guardian about a survey for Panasonic Lumix cameras and one of the questions was "had I seen any online adverts for this brand?" I answered truthfully, no. Then, lo and behold, I come here and what do I see? So, in this instance, the ad hadn't worked, then I did a survey saying it didn't work, then it worked! So advertising is only piece of the jigsaw.

On the other hand, my interest piqued, I tried to click through to the Panasonic website, but couldn't, so the ad, in fact, didn't work after all.

Or is that a mistake?

0
ceepee | 25 August 2009 - 1:21pm

It works for me.

Do you get an error or something when you try?

0
Fraser Lewry | 25 August 2009 - 1:26pm

Nope

nothing happens. The cursor goes to point finger thing when I hover, but clicking does nothing. I've tried right-clicking and opening in new tab and new window but still nothing.

This is the address it's trying to open - http://ad.uk.doubleclick.net/jump/N2121.word/B3700814;sz=300x250;ord=[timestamp]? - if that's any help.

0
ceepee | 25 August 2009 - 3:04pm

Weird

If I click that link I see the page OK. Maybe you have some kind of ad-blocking software that blocks links from doubleclick.net?

Here's the final link, if you really want to see: http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/1567142/index.html

0
Fraser Lewry | 25 August 2009 - 3:12pm

Could well be

I didn't install it but I'm on a University network so the cyber nazis may have put it there.

Ta for the link - I'm actually thinking about buying a new camera so if I do get a Panasonic one I shall make sure I tell them it was all down to The Word.

0
ceepee | 25 August 2009 - 3:25pm

'We have noir'

The only downside of the Ashes coverage, apart from Nasser Hussain droning on and on and bloody ON! about something we'd all just seen, was the heavy rotation of the Peugoet 308 'Drive sexy' advert (case in point : I had to look up the variant). Apart from being a blatant attempt to make ownership of an end-of-life model with extra gizmos chucked in look like the height of metropolitan sophistication, isn't it aimed more at the ladies? Because I'd venture the vast majority of cricket viewers are male, Lily Allen being a rare exception.

0
Graham Johns | 25 August 2009 - 2:14pm

Fact me till I fart

Does anyone else always think of Chris Morris when they see that ad?

0
Gatz | 25 August 2009 - 2:56pm

Yes

Genius. Chris, that is.

0
RobertC | 25 August 2009 - 3:23pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd